It seems to me that this is the logical conclusion of all the shaming of creeps, niceguys, douchey nerds,...

When I read stuff that blue pillers write, I get the impression that they honestly believe that men don't get laid because they are 'bad', that they are misogynist, that they don't respect women, that they are entitled jerks who want only sex, that they only pretend to be nice in order to get into girls' pants and lash out when they don't, and so on.....In other words, not getting laid is a sign of moral deficiency for men!

This is one thing that immediately strikes me when reading blue pill and feminist thought here and elsewhere.

I personally would never use that logic with women. I would never say that a good woman is the one that gets laid more easily. I would never say that getting laid a lot or being able to get sexual partners more easily is a proof of that woman's personal growth and moral quality. I would never say that a woman gets laid a lot because she respects and appreciates men, and that not getting laid is a proof of her misandry. I would never connect getting laid and sexual success with goodness, as far as women are concerned. (And I doubt many people would.)

And yet blue pillers constantly apply this logic to men. This is one pervasive idea on blue pill subreddit, jezebel, feminist blogs, feminist articles in msm,...

Is this perhaps because blue pill believes in Just World Fallacy?

Is this perhaps because men are expected to work and improve themselves in order to get laid? But this indirectly acknowledges that sexual success is harder for men, ie. that men and women are different. This goes contrary to blue pill philosophy.