TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

UK: A former Met Police deputy commissioner is being investigated after allegedly saying the "bulk" of rape complaints were "regretful sex".

furchfur

March 2, 2023
956 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64815863
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title UK: A former Met Police deputy commissioner is being investigated after allegedly saying the "bulk" of rape complaints were "regretful sex".
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 956
Comments 131
Date March 2, 2023 2:57 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11g4rp5/uk_a_former_met_police_deputy_commissioner_is/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uk-a-former-met-police-deputy-commissioner-is.1154751
https://theredarchive.com/post/1154751
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]odysseytree 398 points399 points400 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is how feminists keep false accusation weapon invincible, by making speaking about false accusations a taboo. UK pays £44,000 just for the police report which is being exploited by regretful sex complainers.

[–]No_Mercy_4_Potatoes 75 points76 points77 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This can't be real! People in the winter couldn't afford fuel and electricity, and here the gov is handing £44k just like that?

[–]odysseytree 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.advice.co.uk/how-to-claim/rape-victims-claims-how-much-compensation/

[–]Elterchet 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now that they even more want to decrease resources usage they need to tone down the reproduction even more!

[–]Main-Tiger8593 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

would like them to investigate the data on this topic if it is true that regretful sex is a major problem for the police...

[–]Aimless-Nomad 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I knew there was compensation but i never knew it was that fucking much. No wonder accusations are that high. They are literally paid to lie.

[–]Naru4odo 194 points195 points196 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

So telling the truth gets you investigated and possibly fired... This world we live in

[–]Elterchet 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

always have been

[–]SecTeff 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the article he is quoted making a strong denial and says he has never used the phrase - so why is it even reported until it’s investigated? Just the allegation he said it has damaged his career.

[–]Main-Tiger8593 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

what is the truth? that regretful sex exists or the statement of this officer IF he said this? tbh there is too much information missing and i would like them to investigate the data on this topic... reveal if regretful sex is a major problem for the police or not...

[+]Mitk0o0o -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Spoiler: it is not.

[–]Main-Tiger8593 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

prove it with facts to shut them up else it will never stop

[+]Mitk0o0o 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238713283_Home_Office_Research_Study_293_A_gap_or_a_chasm_Attrition_in_reported_rape_cases

Literally just googled it

[–]Main-Tiger8593 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good start!

i guess feminists would say it is not credible and defame the authors but we need more of that from various credible sources to shut down nonsense...

[+]Mitk0o0o -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No, the statement is wrong. Statistically 3% of rape allegations are false. And UK has a very poor record with regard to handling rape cases.

[–]operative87 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Those statistics are not accurate. It’s impossible to accurately gather such information.

[+]Mitk0o0o -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Only accurate if they support what you say

[–]operative87 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They’re never accurate.

If someone is willing to make a false allegation they’re willing to lie to a researcher too.

These statistics are gathered simply by accuser if the allegation is false or true.

[–]Merebankguy 186 points187 points188 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Met Police Deputy Commissioner Dame Lynne Owens said: "Rape is a horrific offence that has a devastating and lasting impact.

"The comments included in the Operation Soteria Bluestone report are wholly unacceptable.

"We recognise that they risk further undermining the confidence of victims to come forward and that is deeply regrettable.

"Having been made aware of an allegation that the comments were made by a senior Metropolitan Police officer, we have referred the matter to the Independent Office for Police Conduct."

Translation: We can't let this man ruin the false narrative that we have created that women are actually much safer then it seems and also to allow withdrawal of consent because of regret.

[–]needalife94 108 points109 points110 points 3 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

It's so wild to me that people think you can withdrawl consent AFTER sex. Before sex ? Yes. During sex ? Yes. But AFTER the act is done. NO. He was already acting within YOUR CONESNT. It makes absoulutley NO SENSE.

You made a bad decision and now want no consequences for it and also want to put it on the person who was acting within your consent. Shiiiiiit, I wish I could do that with my debt.

scrolls amazon "Oh that looks cool. Buy now, checkout, confirm order." gets item "Ohhhhhh I don't want this now. I'll just withdrawl my consent to them taking the money out of my account." Goes to court "Your honor, I withdrew my consent for them to take the money out of my account after I recieved my item." case gets thrown out of court

[–]Full-Bluebird385 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Just so I can keep up, withdrawal of consent after a sexual act is completed is not acceptable, legally speaking, is it? That doesn't make any sense.

[–]McSkittlefarts 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

in the UK it is yes, but yet in the USA. but that will change as well

[–]Full-Bluebird385 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That's insane. How can a person be held liable for engaging in a sexual act that was fully consensual at the time?

[–]SomeRespect 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Make them sign a contract. Some celebrities actually do that

[–]Full-Bluebird385 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, that would seem to be the only way to cover your ass. Plus maybe video recorded proof of affirmative consent to specific sex acts. But even then, consent can be withdrawn at any time so I'm not sure even this would hold up.

[–]bottleblank 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It could still be claimed, by the logic of some of these discussions, that such a contract was coercive and signed under conditions of fear, or blackmail, or threats, or bribery, or false pretences, or that the type of sex acts were out of the previously agreed scope, or whatever.

I think at that point you'd be well past the point of absurdity anyway though. No normal person wants or needs a wad of risk assessment, responsibility waiver, and consent forms in order to have sex.

Could you even imagine? What kind of a nutcase would you look like if you invited a regular woman back, pulled out a briefcase, and started pulling Sheldon Cooper level "roommate agreement" terms and conditions out of your ass?

I mean, jesus, it's sex, something people do, and have done, spontaneously and naturally, for... well, since literally forever. It would be ludicrous to suggest that the way it has to be, now, is to have a lawyer present and a tape recording of the negotiations.

Not that I don't understand the suggestion, I do see that men would feel the need to have legal protection, same as with prenuptial agreements, but that's no way for us to continue as a species, it would be incredibly sad for that to be the experience anybody has to have.

[–]SomeRespect 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Geez what's the point of contracts at all (in any context, not just sex) if anyone can claim they were forced to sign one by force, rendering the contract invalid?

[–]bottleblank -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In a business contract there are usually laws which govern how they're enforced, clauses which explain when and how it's acceptable to work with each other, and so on. It's a pretty hefty pile of legal history. But in terms of sexual contact? That's not a thing we really have a framework for, and it's based largely on subjective emotions.

It's not black and white printed factual corporate and financial law, when it's very clear, on paper, that Company X shafted Company Y by screwing them out of something material, like financial gains, or products, or intellectual property, or whatever. There are hard facts, numbers, objective measures, audit trails, there are predefined expectations, paths to get to the end goal, and ways to quantify success and adherence to the spirit and the word of the contract, things you can prove in a court of law.

Instead it's someone waking up the next morning and saying "well, that was shit, I'm sore, I'm hungover, this guy isn't half as attractive as he looked in the club, and now I have to go take a morning after pill... this is his fault, he came onto me, I didn't ask for this". You can't reasonably write that up into a contract.

[+]Obarak123 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

13 year old gives consent, parents find out, the consent is withdrawn and whoever slept with their child is charged with rape.

One or both parties are hammered, either through drugs or alcohol and gives consent. Consent is withdrawn once sober.

A superior in a hierarchical organisation uses their power to get consent from their subordinate. Consent is later withdrawn by the subordinate.

I think these are the situations that that law is trying to address. And even then, the victim will most likely not get any help from the courts. But it's not for two sober consenting adults.

[–]Full-Bluebird385 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Makes sense. What if 2 drunk adults have sex and the woman later argues she lacked the capacity for consent even though she happily went along with what was happening at the time? That's more what I envisioned.

[+]Obarak123 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. It gets a bit complex. This is just my opinion so you can refute it.

I guess it depends what you mean by "happily go with it" means. I've heard stories of men getting raped while drunk and the woman argued she recieved consent cause he was obviously aroused enough to penetrate her.

But I think you mean she gives verbal consent and is active during the process. In that case, I think her argument becomes weak, especially if the man is also drunk and therefore has impaired judgement.

These are stats not my opinion:

But I feel I need to repeat this, men are more likely to be raped than falsely accused. And most rape cases are withdrawn before their day in court. AND rape is one of the most under reported crimes for both men and women.

This is my opinion again:

So people posting false accusation posts don't really care about rape of women and I'd say especially rape of men and young boys. And the fact that they are so popular on a men's rights subreddit is annoying.

[–]needalife94 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't if it legally is. But women will use that and be backed up by feminist who think that is how consent works.

[+]AugustusM -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't listen to these guys. There is a lot of hyperbole being thrown around.

There is certainly a discussion to be had about regretful sex and I think it is an issue that is likely underreported and certainly underdiscussed. And I am also certain often times there are abuses of the system. And an accusation can often be just as damaging as a conviction to someone's life.

But, all that being said, UK law is still very clear that sex is only rape if you didn't have a reasonable belief that your partner was consenting when you penetrated them. Withdrawing of consent "after" is not a thing, legally speaking. Any attempt by someone trying to falsely accuse someone of rape would not be able to use this basis. They would have to lie and say something like "I said no" or "no reasonable person would have believed my consent was genuine because I was afraid for my life" etc. And they would have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.

[–]freeball_1 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

They would have to lie and say something like "I said no" or "no reasonable person would have believed my consent was genuine because I was afraid for my life" etc. And they would have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.

Given how biased the legal system is against men it's probably a lot easier to do than you think.

[–]AugustusM 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't practice criminal law, but I still have friends from school that do. While a lot of "progress" has been made by feminist activism to undermine legal protections for men in rape and sexual assault cases specifically it is still the case that rape convictions are really quite hard to obtain. Often times it really does come down to he said she said arguments and most juries aren't willing to convict on that.

A lot of problems that still creep in. Juries are more willing to convict when the accused just "feels creepy" for example, which is really worrisome trend that undermines the assumption of innocence. And of course, often times the simple allegation reaching the High Court/Crown Court can be enough to substantially mess up someone's life.

But I do take some issue with the way this sub approaches sex. The vast majority of sexual encounters will be fine and will not result in sexual assault charges. As long as you are genuinely respectful and choose your partners with a modicum of common sense. Sex is fun and I sometimes worry this sub can put a lot of guys off of it based on the language we use. And while actively choosing to not have sex is a perfectly valid choice that I respect, I don't think we should be fear mongering people into it. If they choose to do that they should know the honest, objective risks and that simple fact is that while the risk of false accusations is higher than I would like, it is not as extreme as this sub makes it out to be. And reasonable mitigation strategies will absolutely help you out legally.

[+]Mitk0o0o 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is a tiny minority of cases. Actually UK have a poor record of supporting rape victims and investigating rape

[–]needalife94 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My comment has nothing to do with the UK.

[+]Mitk0o0o 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well this post is related to UK and there rape is underreported.

[–]needalife94 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it is. I don't know. But my comment had to do with what other dude was saying about withdrawing consent AFTER the sex is done.

[–]m4RLA5INGER 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I’m (F37) in the US but, I once made friends with a radical feminist, I didn’t know she was when we first met she seemed fun and she drew me in with her love of video games and seemed like we had lots in common. As time went on she told me she had been raped by every boyfriend she ever had. I thought, if true this is very sad however I just didn’t think it possible. She explained one of the boyfriends and how essentially he was just bad at sex and she hated having sex with him. She somehow decided that he had assaulted her. She still said it was rape. I was absolutely flabbergasted.

[–]vegasmacguy 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most of feminism is based on what I call 'victimhood glorification' driven by narcissistic tendencies. Basically they need attention so they pretend to be victims of imagined crimes. Hence the evil patriarchy.

[–]excessive_autism23 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s like the entire leftist ideology summarised. By being a victim, they stand on a moral high ground that they must be helped, if not you’re the bad one for not helping them. In this case all women are raped so every man should pay the responsibility for it.

[–]bottleblank 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, and then they bring that to discussions online, where perfectly harmless men talk about struggling with these problems in dating, and these women fire back with "don't you know all women have been raped?", which you can't reasonably argue against without looking like an insensitive bastard.

Yes, I'm sure it does happen that women are legitimately victims of sexual assault and rape. Yes, obviously that's tragic and I would want the law to be applied appropriately in those cases. But it cannot be made an exception of in terms of being innocent until proven guilty, or retroactive consent withdrawal. To abuse the public care for those who have been truly harmed, to try and win feminism points or to justify/excuse a bad (but largely harmless) personal decision is sick, and it has so much potential to mess things up for so many innocent men and rape victims, who won't be believed, because society is arguing about whether "AMAB" or "AWALT".

Psychologically, if you're not one of the many out there who happen to be living a lucky life of moderate success and minimal serious drama, this is a rough time to be alive. All as a result of out of control ideological dogma and selfish demands, people abusing systems to criminalise entirely innocent, natural, and previously acceptable behaviours.

[–]furchfur[S] 187 points188 points189 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Even the police believe most allegations of rape in the UK are false allegations.

Now being investigated for saying the obvious.

[–]gintokireddit 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The police also believed underage teenagers in Yorkshire who were being prostituted out by gangs were just looking for attention or were sluts, so the police believing something is far from great evidence, if you combine a few brain cells together.

[–]sgt_oddball_17 227 points228 points229 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When speaking the truth is a crime, then you are living under tyranny.

[–]Alternative_Meal_904 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or in other words, a fascist dystopia... I mean "I never said the abhorrent and horriffic 'myth' that miacommunications in bed often result in false rape accusations!"

[–]RoryTate 65 points66 points67 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Notice how in the article the investigation is being initiated because of the perceived "harm" his statements "might" cause, but not because his claims were in any way incorrect or wrong due to contradictory evidence. The accusation of a provably wrong statement is never made in these cases, because that would open up the conversation to an objective consideration of the facts, and that would be playing a game where they can potentially lose, when reality presents a different existence. Instead, the attack always starts from within an emotional, moral framework, where reason is out the window, and name-calling is acceptable. My favourite rejoinder to this tactic is still to repeat the wise words of Steven Pinker: "The truth cannot be sexist".

[–]NPCBaiter 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Steven Pinker is/was a deluded feminist pussy himself.

It makes me feel all warm inside to see the feminazis coming after him.

[–]RoryTate 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pinker has had a target on him ever since he wrote The Blank Slate all the way back in 2002, so I don't understand what you mean by "coming after him" like it's something recent. He exposed and debunked all this nonsense over two decades ago, and while he is indeed left of center, and as an academic he is not immune to some of the delusions inherent in that particular echo chamber, I would caution you to not let "perfect" be the enemy of "good". Purity spirals like that are anathema to any chance at compromise and practical communication between groups, and we need all the support we can get in the fight against this modern irrationality and moral grandstanding.

[–]NPCBaiter 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you mostly

and i like his book on violence,
but in this book he constantly praised the feminist movement,
which made the otherwise great book annoying to read.

It was obvious he was trying to play to the leftard academic woke crowd,
so i have some pleasure seeing the appeasment back firing.

I don't think there is some way to stop this female narcissism train calling itself feminism by trying to placate the beast.

Academics should understand and behave in a way consistent with full on war on female narcissism aka feminism.

[+]sadisticfreak -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except he said that he never said that, and that he doesn't even believe it 🤷‍♀️

[–]Character_Pirate_618 84 points85 points86 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"No one is more hated that he who speaks the truth."

[–]Early-Department-234 67 points68 points69 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Since when are stating statistics a bad thing to do?
Feminism is just 2+2=5.

[–]Strigon_7 49 points50 points51 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2+2= You're mansplaining me.

[–]AvailableCandidate89 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn't you know math is sexist?

[–]1029384745612 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sic semper tyrannis

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 31 points32 points33 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's a he said she said case. She said he said it, he denies he said it. Just a flogging for even being accused of questioning the femocracy.

[–]DubsmanAz 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"femocracy" !!!

I'm stealing that one 😂

[–]enthusiasmunbridled 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You shouldn't be assuming anyone's gender with those pronouns.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Another woman accusing a man.

[–]MehowSri 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think we need a sexist potmanteau for it. Something like femcusing.

(/s for the feminists)

[–]RunInRunOn 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why does this get a cop under more heat than actual racism?

[–]Flaky-Illustrator-52 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haven't you heard? Being forced to live with your own poor choices and the consequences thereof is a bigger problem than racism

[–]Largest_Half 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In other words "met police deputy commissioner tells the truth which undermines the narrative of the fragile feminine victims and shows them to just not be able to take responsibility for their own actions"

[–]CharlesForbin 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I am an Australian Copper. I don't know about the UK, and I wouldn't say it was the bulk of complaints, but my anecdotal experience has it between 30-40%, provably untrue, or at least facts so inconsistent with the allegations that there is not even a reasonable cause to suspect an offence has occurred.

[–]matrixislife 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Would you get into bother from professional standards for saying that in public?

[–]CharlesForbin 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

I shouldn't but I was very careful with my wording so as to be clear and factual.

I'm only speaking on my experiences, and not the Department as a whole. For some investigators, they might find 100% of complaints validated by evidence, whereas others might find 100% refuted by evidence. For me, it's around 30-40%.

I could imagine being investigated for any number of disciplinary breaches: Bringing department into disrepute, unlawful release of information, acts to prejudice investigations, acts to prejudice victim rights, etc... None of the above apply to my comment, but that wouldn't stop an ideologue for making the complaint anyway.

[–]matrixislife 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, as a nurse I have to be careful what things I say, whether it has any relevance to areas I work in or not.
Thanks for your reply, it's appreciated especially knowing that even innocuous statements can be twisted by malicious interpretation.

[–]CharlesForbin 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly - and the most serious offence can be embarrasing the Department. There is no sense of humour about that.

[–]matrixislife 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh hell no, there's no worse offense. Though again to be fair, the UK police especially the London Met are going through a crisis of respect right now and it isn't pretty for them, so I can understand why senior police would be bothered about it.

[–]amazonallie -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Here is a woman's perspective who has been the victim of sexual assault that even the worst of the worst against women would agree is sexual assault..

If we don't feel like the police will believe us, it creates a barrier for us to report it. Even your own statement about 30 to 40% would make me afraid to report it to you because you seem to be biased against women reporting.

It is very hard to feel comfortable reporting something if the police retraumatize a legitimate victim.

Coercion is finally being taken seriously as many times men will not take no for an answer, and they push and push and push..

As far as removing consent AFTER the act, there could be legitimate reasons why. Yes coercion. But sex using deception is also a serious problem. Both men and women are guilty of this. It could be because someone doesn't disclose an STI, they lie about their intent to someone, they refuse to let a person leave or breaks a promise about getting them home unless they give in, etc.

Or they were too drunk to give actual consent. Like blackout drunk or were slipped something.

Or someone lied about their relationship status where consent would not have been given had the person been aware of the relationship.

Those are absolutely ways that post encounter consent could be withdrawn. That is not regret.

To have an officer take that lightly, is an absolute travesty.

[–]CharlesForbin 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Even your own statement about 30 to 40% would make me afraid to report it to you...

I take every report, and investigate every complaint. Those percentages are what, in my experience the rate of false allegations were in my investigations. I don't just decide whether to believe somebody or not. My job is to gather evidence and put it to Court. If you're afraid to report because of those numbers, blame the false reporters, not me.

For every 30% I found to be false, there was 70% I found to be true. About a third of those, in my cases resulted in convictions, and I was like a dog on a steak to get them. Those that I found to be true, but failed to convict, were substantiated at least by circumstantial evidence, but there was just not enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. I cannot give more specifics in this forum.

As far as removing consent AFTER the act, there could be legitimate reasons...

You are conflating consent obtained by deception, with the idea of unilateral withdrawal of consent after the fact. That is not a thing. Consent obtained by deception, is vitiated by the deception, and yes a class of rape or SA. I've worked those, too.

Or they were too drunk to give actual consent.

That's consent vitiated by lack of capacity. Most complainants are unaware that cuts both ways. If the male is equally intoxicated then the female is equally liable for his rape.

Like blackout drunk or were slipped something.

I've investigated many of these allegations, and mostly found CCTV or statements from their own witnesses showing the complainant enthusiastically participating in spiking themselves. Although rape activists often claim it is an epidemic, most studies in Australia have shown it almost never actually occurs.

Royal Perth Hospital Study (2004)

I have never once been able to come close to proving it.

Or someone lied about their relationship status where consent would not have been given had the person been aware of the relationship.

That's not a thing, either. The law does not criminalise the ethics between partners. If your partner is a liar, stop sleeping with them. They are a liar, not a rapist.

...To have an officer take that lightly, is an absolute travesty...

It would be. The only things I'm taking lightly here, are new classes of rape you've invented. Unethical, sure but not rape.

[–]pocketknifeMT 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

depends if the media or activist groups pick up on it.

[–]matrixislife 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Possibly, I was curious about the rationale for investigating the guy in the headline.

[–]ChicagoIndependent1 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is probably the vast majority of rape cases in India that people make a big deal about.

[–]Mammoth_Cut5134 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The rate isn't even that high. Its actually lesser than developed countries. I guess if you remove the false cases, rates will be very similar in every country.

[–]XoXSmotpokerXoX -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What are you talking about, their numbers are low because it doesnt get reported or filed. People make a big deal out of India because it is a rape culture and video comes out all the time of women being raped in beaten in the middle of the street during the middle of the day and no one does shit about it. Dont confuse cultures.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's also a country which arrests adolescent boys because the women who raped them fell pregnant in the act.

[–]LettuceBeGrateful -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, +1 to this. I'm not saying Indian men don't have their own issues, because in a lot of ways the courts/police are horribly sexist against men, but the blatant sex crimes that happen over there with no justice is appalling.

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Believe all women. Yeah, how about no. Trust but verify.

[–]Ceigeee 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I bet some of them are.

It's like these Twitlongers that come out about sexual assault claims. You read them and it's literally the girl being like "I said no but then I said yeah" and apparently that's sexual assault???????????? No, you just changed your mind.

There was loads of drama when a TFT competition was happening. People were calling for the head of some young streamer who was participating in it. A girl put out a twitlonger saying he sexually assaulted her. Only, all that happened was:

They kiss and cuddle for a few nights, but no sex. He asks if she wants to, she says no. They carry on as they were.

On the final night, they're kissing and cuddling in the same bed, he asks her if she wants to, and she says yeah this time, but then the lad can't get hard and they do nothing.

However long later, the lad is popular on his stream, he's competing in a tournament, and BOOM, sexual assault accusation.

Coming from a woman - If you are uncomfortable and are feeling a bit pressured, JUST LEAVE? STOP KISSING AND CUDDLING IN BED WITH HIM? Don't all of a sudden later on say you were sexually assaulted because you SAID YES?

[–]boundarychimps 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

twitlonger

a what now

[–]Ceigeee 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It lets you write long posts for twitter ^^

[–]bottleblank 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Well, that sure makes me feel totally excellent about the prospect of trying to date.

I'm only half joking. I don't believe it's prevalent enough that I should let the idea that it's basically guaranteed to happen stop me from trying to experience human connection, something I have drastically lacked my whole life.

But I'm not going to pretend it's a non-issue either, it is something that goes through my mind occasionally, because clearly it does happen, and I suspect with minimal experience I'd be the kind of guy who'd end up getting shafted by it, I'm not likely to be strong enough, agile enough, or socially cushioned enough to cope with that. My already dire self-esteem would suggest I'm the kind of guy that would get called a creep for trying or, if I was successful, ditched and accused afterwards. I am, realistically speaking, a vulnerable individual, in that sense.

Again, though, there's a tyre fire of other reasons I'm not out there trying to find a partner, and that particular one is somewhere buried underneath all of them. It's (relatively) low risk, low priority as a thing to worry about, and quite frankly if it did happen to me, I'd just die with my sense of moral righteousness validated, and happy to be rid of having to worry about any of it any more.

[–]QuerulousShark1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

stop me from trying to experience human connection, something I have drastically lacked my whole life

women are not capable of giving you that - they want YOU to take care of their emotions, they will never do the same for you

[–]Flavz_the_complainer 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Bro cmon.

Its comments like this which is why everyone says this sub is filled with Incels.

You cant paint all women with the same brush because there are some vocal nutters online and youve maybe had some bad experiences in your life.

We would argue vehemently that they are wrong if they said all men were rapists etc so lets not be hypocritical.

Preparing myself for downvotes.

[–]randomusername1934 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's a fair point. I'd argue that the comparison at the end there - while I can see what you're saying - isn't a fair comparison though. Looking back through the women I've met (other than the bulk of the ones related to me, thank goodness) the vast majority of them seem, at best, to be completely untrustworthy - with a worrying number that I can only describe as actively malicious. I'm perfectly happy to accept that that doesn't apply all of them, but it's increasingly getting to the point where it's just a bad bet for a man not to act on the assumption that they are; and I'd be surprised if a large number of the posters here didn't think we'd already crossed that line.

Making that decision is not the same thing as a man saying "Ugh, dude, they're just ALL ******* feminazis, amirite?". It's taking a rational look at the situation, based on the data, and accepting that it's not worth the actual risk to take the shot. After all, he's a man, nobody is going to protect him and there's a serious question about whether he can even rely on the impartiality of the law at this point - on top of that, if he's hit with a false accusation, he'll be lucky if even his family don't disown him.

[+]Flavz_the_complainer -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The women I associate with in my life are some of the best people I know. Both friends, family and ex lovers.

I understand that there are some horribly vindictive ones with their own agenda but thats not really the issue I was taking up.

I think you may think I was responding to the one above the one I was actually responding to because I am sympathetic to the former but the latter is making the claim that women are unable to make a human connection and be emotionally supportive and are infact just self entitled emotional leeches.

This is both equal parts untrue and deranged "incel" talk.

Women are people, even the bad ones. Not some kind of succubus demons out there to ruin the lives of men. If we allow talk like that to persist within the mens rights movement were just going to lose all mainstream credibility and all be written of as fringe incel nutjobs.

[–]randomusername1934 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not disagreeing with your point that women are human. That would be an idiotic position to argue against. Then again human beings are often entirely untrustworthy if not actively malicious. Considering that (at least) the bulk of women under retirement age at the moment were brought up in an environment where they were trained from birth to believe that you, as a man, are evil, dangerous, powerful, and bigoted - and that whatever they decide to do with you will be justified due to an oppression narrative - I think that the fact that men are increasingly trying to distance themselves from women is entirely understandable and reasonable.

Again, I'm not saying that every single woman you ever meet is the kind of psychotic hatemonger who would scream rape the moment you breathed a little too loudly in the same room as her; I repeat - that is NOT what I am saying. What I am saying is that as the number of women who will be happy hurting, abusing, misleading, or using the law as a weapon against you is large and rising. We should also acknowledge that if she does decide to do that to you - unless she's doing the sort of thing that would make the Marquis de Sade feel queasy - almost everyone will be on her side. Even if she is doing something horrific enough to lose the automatic support of the majority of the population and institutions there are still endless individuals and groups who will happily invent justifications for what she was/is doing to try to shift the discussion to how he deserved it or was directly responsible for it. Given these points it is reasonable for a man in the modern first world to act on the assumption that the majority of women he meets are part of that group, as it is the only way he can keep himself safe.

I do not consider myself an 'incel'. To be blunt the word appears to be nothing more than another dehumanising insult and thought terminating cliché.

[–]Flavz_the_complainer -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

women are not capable of giving you that - they want YOU to take care of their emotions, they will never do the same for you

To reiterate i'm calling out comments like this. Dehumanising women and trying to perpetuate the us vs them mentality.

I am not calling you or anyone, even the comment i'm responding to an incel. I agree its an easy buzzword used by opponents generally to silence good debate and dissenting point of view.
I'm saying that is what people who want to discredit this movement will say we all are when they see comments like this.

I agree there has been a worrying trend of women using the laws sympathy towards them to persecute certain men and i'm here arent I? I clearly think that like women's issues there are separate men's issues which we need advocates for such as the men's rights movement.

I just want us as a movement to stay focussed on the issues at hand and not turn into a women hating group. Which again, comments like that make it seem like we are.

[–]randomusername1934 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that the line you quoted there is overstated, but that's a long way from it being false. It's barely a controversial point these days to say that many if not most women seem to see men as little more than an object to be used, and discarded when she has no more use for him. Saying that is not a sign of hatred, that's not dehumanising anyone, that's not inciting anything. It's recognising what the overwhelming majority of men have seen in modern dating and relationships. Are there women out there who are not like that? I'm sure there are. Given the relative distribution and size of those two groups it's a far better bet to run the cost/benefit analysis and assume that the particular woman in front of you is from the unpleasant group of women (who are still people even if they are malicious) until proven otherwise, as that limits the damage and risk you're exposed to, and the 'payoff' that you get if you win that bet is increasingly not worth the odds.

There is an absolutely huge gap between disapproving of a person and dehumanising them. Humans can do and be almost anything after all. Every single one of the most disgusting and flat out evil people, groups, beliefs, and actions in human history - including the ones who were evil on a level that is several orders of magnitude beyond the worst feminist who ever lived - were all still humans. If anything that's what makes their hate, cruelty, lies, and malice worse; it's not as if they have the excuse of being some demonic or sub-human evil. They're just people who decided to believe and do that sort of thing.

[–]DavIantt 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of us are used to the name-calling. It is said that you get attacked more as you close in on the target.

[–]bottleblank 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a difficult thing to balance.

I agree with you, we shouldn't stoop to making massive, divisive, accusatory generalisations, and despite my immense difficulties with socialising throughout my life, and absolute lack of romantic or intimate contact, I really do try to keep my head above water in that regard.

But the flip side of that is there are women/feminists out there who are more than willing to watch the world burn, throwing fuel on the fire left and right, as long as they get to feel superior and invent themselves some "equality" "consulting" jobs or Guardian article clicks. This is seen by men who struggle, words from the horses' mouths, so to speak, direct from women, who accuse men of being creeps and perverts and rapists, when there's no basis in fact for saying that.

These extremist women can get away with saying things men would be crucified for saying. I really can't blame people who have struggled like I've struggled who can't keep denying the existence of these women, these campaigns, these laws and legal processes. I mean, I can't pretend it's not there, I wouldn't consider myself honest if I told guys like that "eh, you're overreacting, it's nothing, just a few loud women getting ideas above their station, crazy man-haters, they're exceptions and not the rule".

Because although, yes, that's true, those women are high level government advisors and police officials. You can't get much more official than that, unless you throw a judge in there too. These people have power, lots of it, and I wouldn't feel right trying to brush that under the carpet, I can't pretend reality isn't existing when I know these guys know what's up, they're not stupid, and they would rightly consider any attempt on my part to tell them that it's "nothing" to be patronising extreme feminist apologia.

You are right. There are women out there who are kind, compassionate, understanding, who want to be with a normal decent guy. Knowing that is one of the few things that keeps me sane. But they're not the ones we hear about, they're not the ones committing horrendous power grabs, skewing society to breaking point with dogmatic demands and officially-backed propaganda. They're not even the ones all over YouTube and TikTok spewing braindead takes about expecting a man to make a quarter mil a year to be "worth it". The women getting in everybody's faces right now are just shovelling boxes of ammo into the hands of those incels, and I don't see that changing any time soon.

[–]freeball_1 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they're not the ones we hear about, they're not the ones committing horrendous power grabs, skewing society to breaking point with dogmatic demands and officially-backed propaganda. They're not even the ones all over YouTube and TikTok spewing braindead takes about expecting a man to make a quarter mil a year to be "worth it".

I have myself said close to 50% of the women that I've met in my life (who aren't directly related to me and a good portion who are related) aren't really even was talking too. Having said that those type of women identified themselves really fast, which makes it really easy to stop engaging with them.

I've also noticed that a large percentage of them end up single childless bitter and alone. Which is great because it means they've removed themselves from the breeding pool. After one generation they and their opinions will die problem solved.

[+]SupaButt 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is refreshing to see in this sub. Thank you for this. Upvote given. I think we as men need to work on lifting each other up and helping each other rather than belittling women. We all want a happy, healthy, and fulfilling life. Let’s start focusing on what we have in common rather than our differences.

Sorry, I’ll step off my soapbox now. Lol

[–]boundarychimps -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

women are not capable of... they want... they will never

Women are the same as every other group of people -- they're all different and all want different things.

[–]Scandi_Navy 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Man caught trying to smuggle illegal statistics into government agency. More latest news on statistics prohibition at eight. Back to you Karen.

[–]Black-Patrick 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How dare him for articulating a perceived pattern.

[–]Key-Point9934 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, are they?

[–]DesertVeteran_PA-C 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But does he have a reason to have that opinion? If he has experience that leads him to believe that is true, what’s the problem?

[–]Redstatesrock 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It’s a thought crime, and Orwell warned us about that. England is screwed. They arrest people for “wrong thinking” in England these days.

[–]DesertVeteran_PA-C 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He’s been in charge of a lot of rape investigations. If in the end, most are found not to be rape, but regretful sex, that would be an evaluation of a pattern using the past, not the future.

How is fraudulently claiming rape a thought crime?

[–]Redstatesrock 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The policeman is being accused of a thought crime, a term coined by George Orwell to refer to thinking wrong ideas, I agree with the policeman. He has the right to state whatever the hell he wants to! Even if he’s wrong!

[–]DesertVeteran_PA-C 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, I think I get it now.

[–]larrykeithfrick 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a VERY commonly occurrence. Consensual sex turning into rape for whatever reason. Kinda like “buyer’s remorse”. Really really f’kd up.

[–]Spare_Development615 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone with the brains of a 5 year old knows he's correct.

[–]Flaky_Green_3722 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He’s most likely not wrong some bitches just be like that it happens in America often

[–]adam-l 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Feminist Reich has really picked up steam.

[–]bigbouncingbanana 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't be surprised if he's onto something.

[–]Run_By_Snowflakes 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

How can you be investigated for saying a truth?

This pisses me off:

"We recognise that they risk further undermining the confidence of victims to come forward and that is deeply regrettable.

Dude... if they have evidence, they can come forward. If all they have is their say-so, and nothing else to support it, then no, we want to encourage those people to stop lying... not all of them lie, but enough do to where men's lives are destroyed because rape accusations are a weapon.

[–]XMaster65 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

bro is LITERALLY telling people the truth from actual life experience, he would fucking know, yet apparently he's not allowed to talk about it, the truth is slowly becoming taboo, what is wrong with the world these days

edit: just wanna say from personal experience, this is 100% true, my 15 year old little brother was falsely accused by some girl he hooked up with once months prior, by the time these accusations came in he already had a girlfriend so that should show u the gap in time, it's attention seeking or jealousy alot of the time, and that's not to discredit real rape cases which are despicable, but it's hard to simply ignore false accusations when they are so common and with the amount of men that have been imprisoned for years because some woman was jealous, and then they get let off Scott free, the off duty type officer that came to our house to discuss the accusations with us basically told us they get shit like this multiple times a week and almost never is it legit, that is so shameful, and sure we're talking about young teens but adults aren't much better, this is just as much of a problem as rape but gets infinitely less attention, the amount of false accusations is also rising as women see the movement to "always believe the woman first without proof", they're being "empowered" to fuck over these men who likely already have enough bullshit to deal with, my little brother was actually extremely stressed out about the situation, it was all he could talk about for weeks and I mean can u blame him? that's his whole reputation let alone possible legal reprocussions on the line, now imagine how many young men are currently going thru the same thing my brother did, it's horrendous, thank god he had a gf to help him thru it bc idk if the kid would've trusted women after that without her

edit 2: forgot to mention we found out her friends had apparently convinced her she was raped and that she should make these accusations, it's that same toxic women supporting each other shit that's happening rn, it could be used positively but it's not, there needs to be more sanctions put in place to assure this shit doesn't happen, but knowing the attitude towards rape in today's climate, no laws are gonna get passed relating to rape unless they benefit the woman, know how many men are making false accusations? likely close to nil because half the time even when it is real rape they won't get taken seriously because "he's a man he probably wanted it"

[–]boundarychimps 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What is the likely breakdown, anyway? I know there were some studies a while back that put "blatantly false" at a single-digit percentage that roughly matched the conviction rate, but is there anything vaguely solid that tries to categorize the middle 80-plus percent?

[+]harmonica2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's he being investigated for exactly though? It says the comment, but how does the police 'investigate a comment'? Are they hoping to dig up some dirt crime dirt on him or something?

[–]secret_tiger101 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I assume the statement was based on his factual knowledge?

[–]TheNerdWonder 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And this is why "believe women" is dumb and not something we should take as seriously. It's an affront to due process.

[–]borderline--barbie 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

regret does not equal rape. i've been saying this for years.

[+]Digger_is_taken 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Anyone actually read the article?

"These are not words I have ever used in relation to rape or sexual assault and the reason I am so certain that I did not say this is because I simply do not believe it; I find the phrase abhorrent.

"I find this characterisation of me to be deeply upsetting, and colleagues who know me know how untrue it is."

[–]bottleblank 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But it does refer to "comments included in the Operation Soteria Bluestone report", which suggests there's some kind of written content somewhere which is being interpreted as saying something similar (though not necessarily by the guy accused), and it (this case/article) is clearly an attack on people in the force who may be somewhat sceptical of the approach being taken. Rightly or wrongly.

[–]February272023 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Three truths can exist at the same time:

  1. Police can mishandle legitimate rape complaints.
  2. Women can lie about rape to get back at a guy.
  3. If neither #1 or #2 will face any punishment, then they'll keep on doing it.

[–]XoXSmotpokerXoX 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

its not always to "get back at a guy", sometimes they go out and party, get drunk, have fun, cheat on their boyfriend/husband, wake up embarrassed and worry about getting caught cheating. Just like that case where you see nerds go for internet points talking about Brock the rapist, that was just a dumb kid with a cheater.

[–]The_Silent_Manic 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. Saw a story a while back of this girl who cheated on her boyfriend, claimed she was raped to cover her tracks. Her boyfriend rounds up his friends, finds the guy his girlfriend falsely accused and beat the man TO DEATH!!!

[–]angryearth -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cops in UK need to stop embrassing themselves around grooming gangs and rapist cops then they can gain the trust of women to say things like this. Without women thinking it’s self serving.

[–]Alternative_Meal_904 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More accurately, based on what I think happened, the police deputy commissioner said that that the 'bulk' (which is a plurality but NOT necessarily a majority) of rape accusations were regretful sex, and then took it back and used the usual fake words like "horrific" and "abhorrent" like as if he was forced by Joseph Stalin or some other fascist dystopia.

I assume this includes miscommunications in bed as well as retroactively taking back consent after the sex finished. This is very true, as he was only saying that false rape accusations were too common and that false rape accusations are comparable in severity to rape. At least that's the vibe I'm getting.

My point is that the police deputy commissioner is a coward and should have stood up for the truth, which is that false rape accusations are severe AND that they are way too common. After all, that is all his "regretful" sex quote was saying.

The government really loves projecting its lack of care for actual rape victims. They show this by defining miscommunications as rape, thereby equating miscommunications in bed to the most severe cases (involving knives or guns). Is it one of the biggest disservices to both the falsely accused and to the rape victims.

[+]SupaButt -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It seems like most commenters here agree with this alleged sentiment. But in the article, the commissioner in question himself denies saying “regretful sex” and that "these are not words I have ever used in relation to rape or sexual assault and the reason I am so certain that I did not say this is because I simply do not believe it; I find the phrase abhorrent”

May I ask, if you do agree that “the bulk of rape complaints are regretful sex”, what is your definition of “regretful sex”? Do you think people file a rape accusation to the police just in an attempt to get that person in trouble?

I very much disagree with this but the reason I joined this sub is I want to hear your perspective bc I don’t understand it. I am not coming from a place of judgment but just a place of confusion. Thanks!

[–]bottleblank 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

May I ask, if you do agree that “the bulk of rape complaints are regretful sex”, what is your definition of “regretful sex”? Do you think people file a rape accusation to the police just in an attempt to get that person in trouble?

I haven't made a judgement either way, and I don't know what the guy may or may not have said, but it would be unreasonable to deny that some rape allegations are malicious and untrue. Do I think it's the "bulk" of reports? I would very much hope not. But in this era of "believe everything women say and ignore that they're human/capable of cynicism, manipulation, malice, and violence"? I can't guarantee that.

As for the definition of regretful sex, I would've thought that was fairly self-explanatory, even to me as a person who doesn't get any sex, never mind the chance to find it regretful or not. To me it plainly means sex which in the moment seemed like a good idea but, in the harsh morning light, perhaps blurred by a fearful hangover, those who indulged may not enjoy the decisions their previously enthusiastic selves made.

Or perhaps they were sober, but had sex with the person before they got to know them, and discovered that the person they had sex with was actually not a very nice person (but not necessarily criminally so), so they felt "tricked" into having sex with someone they might not have if they'd known more about them first.

Or perhaps their mental state is questionable, they assumed something about the situation which wasn't communicated, they became angry that all was not as they thought it might be (for example, the guy may not have been interested in anything more than one-off sex, but the woman thought he was sticking around for the long haul), and wanted payback.

[+]Mitk0o0o 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally just googled it

[–]KrazyJazz 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists are looking more and more like bolchevik political commissars who do not hesitate to ruin the career, even life, of anybody not following the script to a T.

Remember the sketch 'Are we the baddies'? So...question: Are we really the 'goodies' here? The 'beacon of freedom' of a dark world full of tyrants?

[–]blaizken_420 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He should be investigated for never charging sex offender women with rape.

[+]Nihi1986 -12 points-11 points-10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure regretful sex exists and some women are stupid enough to turn it into a rape experiencie, though some men are also stupid enough to make them feel that way😑

[+]matrixislife -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't matter what he believes, it matters how he conducts an inquiry, part of which is a requirement to take an accusation at face value when it's made. Sure there's a ton of false accusations made, but he can't turn round to someone making an accusation and say that. His job is to collect evidence, not deny it exists to the complainant.

The problem for me with this article is not that he would be investigated after saying that in a private conversation. He should be, to make sure he is doing his job and not convincing people to retract accusations. The problem is that that it is made public by the bbc. Then they'll say "the public don't have much faith in the police nowadays".

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter