There's a lot of disputes around here for figuring out which of the selective traits is most important for men. Height, being in shape, having a pretty face, social status, game, money, ambition.... The list goes on. This is further complicated by the fact that truly excelling in any one area will net a decent amount of success. 1% earners slay, very tall men do well, a super handsome face is easy, being absolutely shredded is enough to pull some girls by itself. And this is further complicated, again, by the fact that women have variations in preferences. So moving forward, we'll try and isolate out top 1% performers in any categories, and try and average out women's preferences so we can figure out what's most important.

I'm going to try and tweak some variables and see if we can make some conclusions. There's a lot of overlap in categories, but let's try and simplify them into as few as possible. I propose 5 main ones: charisma, social status, finances, face, and body. One could easily argue for more or less categories, but I won't spend too much time in defending these ones.

In order to try and isolate variables and avoid extremities, I'll propose using percentiles of 20 for an isolated variable and 60 for the others. We'll see how this all plays out

You can play out the scenarios in your head, but I think Intuitively we all know that being top 20th percentile in rizz will pay way more dividends than any other singular trait. This should confirm with our experience, we've all seen short, broke, kinda ugly guys pull with the gift of gab. There are too many instances of tall, handsome guys, even with money, striking out in the dating world.

So, excepting the affects of top 1% in any category... Any examples or evidence to the contrary?