Sugar dating is generally different from direct sex work as it's generally based on long term arrangements but it has the same basic concept of being an option for men that have extra money to spend on their dating life and women who want to date more strategically and get paid for it.

I've read a lot of the sugar dating subs as its interesting to read dating strategy from another angle as just the basic Red pill/blue pill one.

I think if you're a man with disposable income($1500+/monthly) that is interested in dating woman that are younger/hotter than he is than this is a great option for you. A lot of sugar relationships either work as good win-win trades for both parties or do actually often times end up in regular romantic monogamous relationships overtime as people genenuinelly start to enjoy eachother without the sugar aspect needing to be directly there.

If you're a woman that is at least average in attractiveness or above who perhaps doesn't want to settle down right away and would like to date one or a few men over the next few years of your life and get dinners/trips/gifts paid then this is a great option for you too.

I like the codependence/independence/interdependence model of relationships and I would consider sugar dating an independent modern version of trad-con dating where the man provides for a woman who instead of tying himself down to him still provides him with feminine caregiving(sex, feminine energy, w/e he wants really) but just on a shorter term and non permanent basis.

It's really just bad for men who can't afford it(80-90% of men, let's be real) and the men who can afford it but want to just organically date for marriage and women who don't want to take part in any directly transactional arrangement.

Thoughts?