Here is the local news report & audio.
The report tries to say she tried to used her job to threaten the man, but really she threatened him by calling the cops, attempting to ruin a totally innocent man, when all he did was drive her home.
She claims in her press conference there was more to the story (yeah right), that he tried to make a pass at her, that she didn't recognize the route he was taking and that it made her FEEL uneasy by doing his JOB, fortunately he was wise enough to not be emotional, pull out his phone and record the interaction or his life could be ruined for doing nothing. Just have to wonder how many bodies she left in her track, especially being an assistant District Attorney.
Also, much respect to him for saying he didn't want her to be fired, but to have an HONEST apology from her. This is the way to treat women and especially manipulative ones, his demands about how she should be punished is not by losing her job (the way a feminist treats situations is to have the man's life ruined) but to apologize honestly for her behavior. Respect.
There is a critical lesson here, the need to record more and more interactions with women, quickly and subtly too. Especially when dealing with women in your life who you know in advance are extremely manipulative. They will try and ruin your life to get their way, even try to ruin your life just to save face even AFTER the situation is proven to be 100% in the wrong in her actions.
You are guilty until proven innocent in 2017. Record your interactions, you need evidence in this world to survive. We must all adapt.
If this man hadn't recorded the conversation, given her status, very good chance he's not only without work, but in jail for doing nothing but keep his head down, work hard, and mind his own damn business.
The speech of this ex-prosecutor during press conference is some mighty hamstering on display. Mind blowing to see that in action. 'Did I avoid a potentially danger situation? I guess, we will never know' and other gems.
The news coverage is an absolute trainwreck, the amount of soft language is maddening. "Happened to" "as a result of."
That soft language is the convoluted legalese that most law schools beat out of aspiring attorneys who want to “sound like a lawyer when they talk even if they don’t know what they are talking about.”
She is low energy. Her words are hollow. He bar status should be revoked. She should be disciplined by the bar at least.
The more concise terms for her penny-per-word approach to language are “did” and “because,” respectively.
Edit: there is a really good chart on amazon that has a whole list of words to avoid when briefing a case. It also applies to everyday speech. Be concise when possible.
Guy is a black knight genius, asking for an honest apology knowing she'll never admit fault. Hope her convictions are challenged.
Sounds like every relationship I've ever had. Women will never admit when they're wrong or at fault.
Punish them harder if they refuse to do so. Another guy posted about the power of silence. Read that article. Either she will reflect what she did or you can ghost her permanently. In both situations you will win
I have a theory that they are constantly reflecting on what they did, so that they can shape and spin the memory into one that absolves them of all blame and responsibility. Once they have crafted the perfect narrative, they repeat it to themselves until they have wholly internalized it.
This is what is meant by "living my truth."
You are correct on a few points here, here's an article I think you might like:
search "Why You Shouldn't Explain Female Nature to Women" - RedPillDoctor
Silent treatment to my wife is like delivering the poison apple. I swear if I ghost for even one afternoon she dreads like there's no tomorrow. But the minute I try to argue with her or disprove her utter nonsense, she salivates like a hound. Just walk away, gentlemen.
It's her own crazy mind that defeats her. They crave attention.
It's so enlightening living with a woman for a long period of time. I mean this as objectively as possible - they're truly fucking crazy.
Read my username loud and slowly. The best words are those never said
Attention, de-nail? De-nail what?
Why not just tell women about trp? Shouldn't any honest women recognize her own tendency not to want to admit fault and the importance of ignoring that tendency and look to agree to fault ?
I think you forgot your /s ahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahshhaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bless. You cannot have ANY narrative or discourse about gender if it makes women look even slightly bad. How dare you suggest women are x even though there is a mountain of evidence. It's all about feels, which was appropriately bolded in the op
But not all women operate this way. Some women can accept reality.
Should. Yeah. Shouldn't every man recognise his specific behaviour? If you could, you wouldn't do any mistakes. Let me give you an example. A women comes to you with a problem and is complaining about it. Your first natural reflex is, that you want to solve her problem. Cause we always want to solve problems. That's a mistake on your side, because she is going to feel useless. Most men don't get this right. Asking for help and venting are two things
This was one of the largest red pills discovery that I learned was that they don't actually want a solution to the problem. It's in mens nature to solve problems logically. What they really want is an emotional tampon to listen to her emotions, not to actually fix the issues.
Well what I'm saying is any woman who doesn't agree to be a hypoagent would be willing to introspect and admit to fault.
I don't know if my comment went through, reddit seems to delete links all the time,
There's a great article on that topic and why you shouldn't explain female nature to them. They won't get it and any perceived attack against them will make the hamster start spinning to absolve them of any blame. Women would never act on something that would give them a disadvantage:
Search for "Why You Shouldn't Explain Female Nature to Women - RedPillDoctor
This isn't true. This is just vitriol salt.
Fear off loss is more powerful than their reputation. Be a RP man and they will beg for your understanding and forgiveness.
Comments like this make you no different than a militant feminist.
If this reflects all of your relationships, than maybe you need to reflect on yourself. The common denominator here is not the females.
Of course- but they will NOT admit specific fault because they are unable to recognize or acknowledge specific fault.
They will beg a desirable man for forgiveness in order to get him back on the plantation. They will NOT be able to see or acknowledge what they did was wrong. To a woman, apologizing is a tool to deepen their control and power and has nothing to do with honor, or improving themselves except to the extent they learn how to be better liars next time.
When a woman is sorry it is NOT for what she did- it is that she got caught. Women laugh shamelessly with their boyfriends and lovers about how their husband is so weak and works so many hours that he doesn't even know she is cheating. They have NO shame except their public reputation and they are more than happy to lie, cheat, and blame shift to keep the dominate position or to keep her Alpha lover blasting in her holes.
Men cheat too, all the time. Don't hang out in bitchy angry phase just because woman are fundamentally different. You are taking their behavior personal, instead of understanding it is biological.
You have a really hard time admitting that the nature of women is generally shitty don't you? Sure men cheat, but that's not the topic at hand here, it's women not admitting mistakes.
BluepillProfessor is correct, When a woman is sorry it is NOT for what she did- it is that she got caught.
Okay so here's the situation. My GF at the time went out camping with me and my family. I find her phone one night with messages from some other guy and their romantic exchange of replies "I miss you can't wait to see you" was her reply... so obviously something is going on.
I confront her about it and she tries to flip the script to blame me for looking at her phone! Nevermind the fact that she's been cheating on me with some guy for a while. She completely ignores this fact and makes it out that I am the bad guy for looking at her phone. Yes I know it's shitty and untrusting to look at the phone but that doesn't excuse her for cheating on a person in a relationship! She absolutely denied it all.
Next week they're in a relationship, funny.
So after that is when I started my Red pill journey. I went farther and farther down the hole to realize that they aren't sugar spice and everything nice.... what a complete lie.
So yeah, I deserve to be salty for that shit. What would you have done in your RP wisdom? Huh? If being a nice person and not cheating on my partner is my fault then that's ridiculous.... I'm absolutely MGTOW now, there's no way in hell I'm going to put up with women who can't be adults and speak truth.
Its hard, but don't confront if you find yourself in that situation again. Just walk.
Take your time and go through the phases. Just realize that all this wasted negative energy could be spent in bed with a fun girl or the progression of your life mission.
The "can't speak truth" comment means you still have some reflecting to do. You are mad that a rock isn't water. You are mad because she chose not to participate in your fantasy.
She was weak, but so were you.
Yeah, I went MGTOW. I have now walked away from all of it. Enough of the bullshit, emotional rollercoasters and PUA games just to be able to get a woman. The juice is not worth the squeeze.
I'm confused what you mean by "can't speak truth" are you saying women shouldn't be honest? I really do not understand your angle here. My point remains, females will never admit truth and your solution of walking away means it will never be addressed and they will always continue to act as such. It's a no-win scenario.
This article proves it: search "Why You Shouldn't Explain Female Nature to Women" - RedPillDoctor
OT. But have you heard of an app that removes women's makeup. Quite the shitstorm it is generating?
Hilarious, it doesn't even have to work properly to do it's job. Imagine the widespread panic when dudes are putting their pics through a filter that makes them look uglier.
Do you have a link or know of any investing options?
Although it was tried on men and men didn't look much different. Because they don't use makeup on the whole.
The only place I use makeup is on the hole. -_-
MakeApp, I believe it's called. Costs 0.99
Oh look, an app worth paying for
This guy is a fuckin genius. How's THAT for plausible deniability hahah
// , I think we're going to see more and more of this done in good faith, though.
If he hadn't made it, someone else with even nobler motives would have.
Some scientists recently trained an AI to detect homosexuality from face photos, as part of an experiment to prove that it couldn't be done.
They weren't too pleased with the moral implications, but science is science.
Fucking genius. Reminds me of those times I've bitten back in arguments on sensitive political or social issues. My replies are so walled-in with PD that I have to hold back a shit-eating grin with every ounce of my being.
What a boss.
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/makeapp-ai-based-editor/id1236717369?mt=8
Funny story about this app. I asked my sister and girlfriend both "Have you heard about this app I think it's called Makeapp or something?" Immediately without hesitating, both of them absolutely went insane on a 5 minute rant about how horrible it was and degrading and shameful and all of these things. I didn't even say anything about it, just asked if they had heard of it.
With my sister I kept pressing her on WHY it made her mad, and she couldn't actually give me a reason but kept bringing up how it relates to "it's wrong to want to see women without makeup."
This is the source of women's in group preference.
Anything that threatens female power and control is dealt with unanimously and with extreme hatred by all means and by allwomen. They have all read Sun Tzu and all of them know:
Intersex relationships are WAR.
All warfare is deception!
Thus whatever exposes the lies is the enemy.
This is why they hate trp and makeup outing aps.
While deception is big in warfare, building better weapons is huge as well. That is why we say to lift.
The much stronger weapon to build is a DNGAF attitude with options instead of oneitis.
Would you be willing to make a post on that?
Holy cow. That's too funny.
The shitstorm is being called "The Haggening" hahahhahhahaha! It's so fucking awesome! This will totally show nervous kids that the princess they've elevated to goddess status is really a fucking toad.
Maybe write a post about it?
Come to think of it, I've been seeing some before/after pictures that could be from this app, though I didn't care enough to look at what it actually was at that time. Have not heard any outrage about this in my part of the world, so a write up could be nice.
A TRP post about the app called 'Makeapp' was posted here less than a day ago but the text from the post has since been deleted. Google image makeapp and you can see what it does. Remember a few months back when already attractive women were posting pics of themselves without makeup for 'empowerment'? We some have been having a very different reaction to this app, calling it sexist and mysogynistic.
I do not believe I am qualified enough on the subject.
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/makeapp-ai-based-editor/id1236717369?mt=8
Empirical evidence of how powerful a women's projected social narrative to the outside world is to them, in this case she willfully chases it right off the cliff of her career and smacks down into the valley below, Wile E. Coyote-style. Holding onto her digital evidence-refuted hamster to tell others (especially other women) was more important to her than rationally hanging onto her career and future income potential.
The best part for her is she'll find some Billy Beta that buys into her sob story, and to fall back upon even if her career is turned into wreckage. Underestimate the primacy of a woman's hamster-spun narrative over rationality at your peril.
Meh. Lots of men have said "do you know who I am" as well. That isn't a female construct
Yeah, but not alot of men continue that level of hamstering when met with clear evidence of what they did. Men would be more concerned with saving that career than maintaining the narrative for what I can only assume is social validation.
I'm 35 soon and not a single woman I've ever been in contact with so far in life (including my own mother and sister) has ever, EVER admitted fault in anything. I'm starting to think it's impossible for women to see their own errors. I've done a lot of messed up things that I've upon reflection have realized "Wow, that was really fucked up of me" but I've always (if it's been bad enough) talked to the person in question face to face to apologize for whatever I did.
Hypoagency is a foundation concept of TRP that will wake most dudes up. It did for me too. Pet theory, but women who are in optimal relationships seem to act slightly different. Working on that thought.
Make her pussy tingle, and she will beg for forgiveness.
Be better than her.
Humans in general never apologize to humans in a lower caste.
sorry to hear that. I've met good women or men and and not-so-good, I just think it varies with the person, I don't think this depends on gender.
// , It does depend on gender, but like most stereotypes, there's always a chance that it won't affect one person as much as another.
Try working in IT. Those ladies in the human resource, legal and marketing department will blame all their failures on the IT guys.
Didn't get something turned in. IT guys fucked the servers up (happened to me quite often).
Their computer is fucked up somehow, blame the IT guy.
They sent a document to the wrong queue, blame the design of the workflow the IT fixed.
I can keep going. Don't even get me started on the request that these people wanted. Literally wanted us to do their jobs for them. Guys that work in It know what I mean. Thank god I'm no longer working there no more.
Yeah. When my marriage was ending my ex kept blaming me for the "decision" she was making.
// , Don't you know it's men's fault that women are usually the ones filing for divorce?
// , I've met one woman who was super apologetic if I had enough proof that she was incorrect.
But it is rarer among their kind, even to each other, I suspect.
I don't know, my gf is pretty reflective and self aware. But I do see your point, there are very few women who are being honest to themselves.
lol this chick cried and tried to play the victim in her apology speech
That's because it isn't an apology speech.
Yeah..it's a "change the narrative and implant suspicions" narrative. "I'm the real victim here...or could have been!"
This is very good audio to listen for the cues of a woman building a case in her head. As man you need to be aware of how and when this starts to happen so you can fight against it. Her manipulation in all of this is that she was basically threatening this guy with the various false claims she was going to make when the cops showed up.
I lost one of my jobs after matching on tinder with a girl who was related to my work. It didn't work out between us. Lo and behold she even complained about me and I resigned. I didn't lose that much by losing that temporary job. I like to think I even gained by picking up that truth.
A positive way to look at it. And yeah you learned something.
It sounds weak to resign. There must be more to this story.
Yeah, getting fired is worse because thats harder to explain to future employers.
Why would future employers even know? Since they were so eager to throw you under the bus, they were already planning to get rid of you. I've resigned from jobs when I've perceived that they don't want to keep me, but it I'd newer resign over a false accusation as that is about the same thing as admitting guilt.
That's actually a really good point.
How would you explain a resignation?
you don't? who the fuck volunteers that info
just omit it for fuck sake
"How did you lose your old job"
"Why is there a gap on your resume"
who are these people who put their failings on a resume?
here's a pro tip in life: don't.
LOL
its not the fucking FBI, its a corporation, you can omit all kinds of shit from a resume without any consequence whatsoever.
what, you also gonna put that you had an illegal side biz as a kid selling lemonade and evaded taxes on you earnings? get the fuck out of here
quit. say that time was a family member being ill or that you worked for yourself in your field. this shit is not that hard guys
You didn't lose your job after matching on tinder, you resigned after you dated her and it didn't work out.
Don't hamster.
Can you give us the whole story? You're being a woman about this. Important details are missing. Did you know you worked with us? And if so, the tinder point is moot. Then you just dipped your pen in company ink.
This is why, this is exactly why, I refuse to budge on whether or not I will record my sexual encounters. Any woman who makes a false rape claim against me will be met with video evidence of how much she enjoyed it at the time and a countersuit for defamation of character, as well as probable criminal charges for filing a false police report.
This bullshit is not going to stop until we men begin hitting back. Any woman filing a false charge needs to be hammered with the law.
I recommend carrying a voice recorder at all times. They're cheap and easy to use, and can be used to save your ass. Remember amused mastery! Do not let them make you angry. Keep control of your emotions and let them be the angry and emotional fool on record.
Yes and always remember:
Maybe taping someone else is illegal wherever you are.
Would you rather be an alleged wiretapper or an alleged rapist?
Just note that there are States where it can't be admissible as evidence in court. So, it can't solve all problems.
Of course, if you spread it online or the news after you've been convicted - you could probably get out of a conviction and get an appeal (or even a pardon?).
I am not saying that it is a get out of jail free card.
It is just an avoid social ostracization card.
https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/LAWS-ON-RECORDING-CONVERSATIONS-CHART.pdf
In the USA if you live in a one party consent state, record always.
If you don't, you need to look up your state law. You might get into legal trouble if you get caught just by recording without consent.
Even if you are in a two/all party consent state, when you're in altercation like this, ask permission to record the conversation. "Ma'am, do I have your permission to record our conversation?" Ask before AND after you hit record. "So we are now recording, ma'am, once again, you have given me permission to record our conversation, correct?"
Also, in two party consent states, it's legal to record in public places (no expectation of privacy) or your place of residence (i.e. security cameras/recorders are cool) in a majority of them. So, there's some contradictory laws on the books that can be fought in court.
Overall, recording devices should be used to protect yourself. The laws are generally used to protect people or to stop people from blackmail. You can hire a lawyer later, in any respect as long as you don't flash it around and try to fuck someone over with the recording.
you leak that shit before the trial bro. lol.
just say you are recording yourself, catching her was incidental. you're recording proves your own behavior with your consent even if it is inadmissible regarding her behavior.
It's not as if anyone would know you recorded the encounter UNTIL after you defend yourself from a false rape accusation anyways. Just be smart about it guys, keep the recordings to yourselves until they're needed in court.
Have you ever had to use a voice recording or video evidence to prove your innocence? Interested to hear more on this.
I have not. I have spoken before about a friend of mine who had a chick take her engagement ring off to flirt with him who then accused him of harassment when her fiance discovered it. Since then, I carry a nine dollar voice recorder in my pocket all the time. I use it for mental notes, but also it's easy to hide and hit record if I think something unusual is happening.
Better to have it and not need it and all that I guess.
You're not considering getting caught in the act though... If a woman catches you recording her without consent during sex, you're in for a shit storm.
I think having the voice recorder ready is a good idea, but recording everything by default is going to get you in a lot of trouble some day. It doesn't matter at all what your intentions are, you're gonna be fucked if you're caught. Plus, it is pretty sketchy and morally wrong to record someone during sex without their consent... If you're that worried about false rape claims, maybe you should just stop taking chances.
I don't record without consent, although I don't need it since I live in a one-party notification state. Nothing I said indicated that I do so. I simply walk over and turn on the camera and that's the end of it. If she wants to argue, she can leave. It's non-negotiable.
Lol I find it very hard to believe that any woman would ever agree to this. If you aren't just full of shit, you're weird and paranoid and I doubt you have their consent.
Theatrical laughter is an intellectually dishonest debate technique.
I don't give a shit what you believe.
If you aren't just stupid and foolish, you're puerile and confused about reality, and I doubt your pretention equals your frame.
Bro put down the thesaurus, you're not fooling anyone
Her name needs to appear at least once ITT. Here. Dallas prosecutor Jody Warner was fired for attempting to ruin a man's life for no reason.
Also, Jody Warner is 32 years old but looks 45.
Come'on OP, you'd jizz on her face. She's pretty worn out lookin' but she'd get the job done. I mean she'd claim you raped her... but she'd get it done.
Was basing my estimate on the picture but I have to admit that she looks in her (mid to late) thirties in the video. Which is too old for my taste.
Lol. There should be a false rape accusator registery, so that we can know whom not to get any contact with whatsoever.
I was expecting someone with less baby fat around the face, based off the picture. Would still bang.
Hard drinking, masculinized lawyer women age more quickly than beach bunnies. By 44 they have to start shaving their menopausal mustache face.
nah. 32 is bout right. what I noticed the most were that woman's crazy eyes. in every photo, in every recording, even when crying on camera, always the same expression
32 minus 6 (number of years at the office for the District Attorney) equals 26. Subtract 3 more years for law school. 23. Subtract undergrad plus an up to year of doing nothing and we are at about 18.
Maybe birthdays and academic terms add up a certain way and the BAR plus waiting for results and getting admitted, this lady has been on one track her entire life as an “adult.”
That means the DA’s office was probably the only real job Jody Warner had in her life. Let that sink in. She threw away her career, possibly destroyed all reputation, over being drunk and childish.
Damn. Women like that have no concept of accountability.
As an owner of a newer car, who's considering driving for Uber/Lyft, this is my fear. If I do pull the trigger (so to speak) and drive for either company, my front and rear dash cams will be joined by one pointed towards the interior of my vehicle. There's the recent video of an Uber drivers riparian being emptied, now this, the risk is there and I won't be a victim
It doesn’t pay. It isn’t upwardly mobile, and its putting extreme wear-n-tear on your capital while the company profits while teaching you no skills. The only good thing about it is that you can log in and out at will. The only thing I would consider it for a day or two was if I was new to the area and was driving around for a day anyway.
At least with some service sector jobs like landscaping or window cleaning, you don’t bring your own supplies, and after being in a crew for a while, can hope to open your own business. Even McDonalds will pay some college tuition.
Even eBay, you can build a brand/following with niche merchandise and hope to do sales offsite. Uber has nothing as far as I can tell.
Actually, you can get a clone of the Uber app made for a couple hundred bucks and many jurisdictions have a permitting process in place for app-based delivery services. It is entirely possible to build a small cult following on Uber and then have them download your app, to call your car, and eventually your drivers.
For sure would install at least a recording device and as you say cameras. But of course you need to consult the local law.
In some areas you will need to put stickers on your doors disclosing the fact you are recording.
The current split for Uber is about 60/40, meaning you as the driver get to keep ~60% of your fare.
If you're just taking a drunk to another bar a mile or two away, you've just let a stranger in your car for a fare of as little as $3 sometimes.
Like any driving job, the longer routes are what you want since they'll pay the most. It's pretty random what you'll get though.
I drove a taxi for many years, what are the best jobs depends on how busy it is. If it's busy, you want short fares because they keep you where the action is, so less dead miles.
If you do get a dash cam that looks inside and out. I think these uber drivers picking up drunk girls are fucking ludicrous for not recording their interactions with riders by default.
In my state, you can carry a firearm in your glove box without CCW permit. I recommend this tool, in case your cameras don't dissuade ruffians.
In the evolved scheme of things men’s reproductive best interest involves sacrifices. When a man commits to parental investment with a woman he takes on sunk cost risks. The time he spends investing himself committed to one woman and the children they produce comes at the cost of reproductive opportunities with other women. Women’s sexual strategy necessitates he compromise or abandon his biological imperative. Naturally, both men and women have adapted ways to circumvent monogamy to optimize their sexual strategies (infidelity, short-term breeding schema), but the basic equation is the same; if a man is invested in one woman it limits him from seeking other (potentially better) reproductive opportunities. If you want to know why Plate Theory irks women so much look no further.
The only way this compromise of sexual strategy can be advantageous to men is if he can be relatively assured that the child he’s raising is his own. This is where men’s Existential Fear of paternity fraud begins. He cedes his own strategy and the sunk opportunity cost for reproduction in exchange for the certainty that he’s invested in a child that bears his name and his blood.
I call this men’s Existential Fear because denying men the certainty of paternity presents the same existential anxieties as a woman’s control of Hypergamous doubt taken from her. Women fear the idea of being forced to birth and raise the child of a suboptimal man not of her choosing, while men fear the idea of being deceived into raising a child not of their own genetic lineage. And until the advent of DNA testing only a woman could be certain that the child was her own.
This is root level stuff here. So important was the determination of paternity for men that an obsessive concern for it was written into our mental firmware. The risks of falling for paternity deception was that important, and the men who evolved this compulsion were selected-for. The reason we Mate Guard, the reason our hindbrains default to jealous suspicions, the reason we cannot bear the thought of another man mating with our woman is rooted in the fear of investing ourselves in a child not our own.
In the previous essay I mentioned the natural revulsion response humans have towards things that are inherently harmful to us. A reservation or revulsion of snakes, spiders, feces, rot and necrosis are part of the evolved firmware we’re born with. I would also argue that the revulsion women feel towards “creepy” (low SMV, Beta) men and the revulsion men feel towards “slutty” women is part of this. Both these revulsions are adaptational protections against our respective Existential Fears. Each represents our Instinctual Interpretive Process letting us know what our ancestors had to avoid.
The Mentor
I get this response a lot when I discuss this, and yes, it absolutely can be when the choice to do so is of your own making. In fact, the reason adoption/mentoring seems such a noble undertaking is exactly because it requires a man to repress his natural concern for his ow paternity. Kinship affinity will always play a role in men and women’s relationships with the next generation. Human beings are innately tribal and familial because tribalism promotes the advancement of selected genes. So repressing this innate predisposition is exceptional, maybe even noble depending on the social context, but it is so because it requires a man to ignore his natural wiring. For what it’s worth, I think multi-generational mentorship in Red Pill awareness is going to be a new imperative in the coming decades.
It’s just this pushing past our natural, evolved, concerns about paternity that’s been the operative dynamic of the Feminine Imperative in consolidating power. The human revulsion response can be molded. Usually this is through some form of operant conditioning. Revulsion can even be conditioned to be associated with pleasure. The Feminine Imperative has been remolding men’s evolved need for paternity to its own ends for some time now.
The popularization of ‘Poly Relationships‘ is one of the more recent redirects of men’s paternity need. As I mentioned above, the goal state of the Feminine Imperative is ensuring that women’s sexual strategy – and anything that foments it – is the socially ‘correct‘ imperative. Men must become more like women if they want to be accepted by a social order defined by women’s experiences. Men’s sexual strategy is only acceptable when it serves a woman’s purpose, so men’s existential imperative of ensuring paternity is always going to be in conflict with women’s strategy. A man insisting on his own paternity and the perpetuation of his name is in direct conflict with women ensuring she chooses to breed with the best specimen and be provided for by the best male she can lock down.
This being the mechanics of it, it comes as no surprise that the social conventions of this era encourage men to abandon that evolved need. We make “heroes” of men who marry the single mother and assume the parental investment costs of the man she chose to breed with. A fem-centric society makes this a noble responsibility – “He Manned Up for the loser who wouldn’t take that responsibility” – all while ignoring the simple fact that this ‘hero’ is only completing women’s Hypergamous imperative. And it’s come to the point that a man abandoning his sexual strategy is part of women’s expectations and entitlements of Beta men.
For the men who insist on their own strategy, the message is one of shame. Only a man who’s “insecure in his masculinity” would think that a child would need to be his own. In fact, the very title of “father” is offensive to a social order based fulfilling women’s imperatives. Father’s Day must become, ‘special persons’ day‘. Men should never insist that a wife assume his last name. And of course, DNA testing to determine paternity (even in light of life threatening illness) is to be discouraged if not outlawed.
This whole Hollywood Metoo bullshit is just ambitious floozies covering their tracks.
The only way to stop this is to equal the penalty for accusation as for crime.
In my opinion actual rape should be punishable by serving a life sentence. These women with false accusations deserve to rot in jail as well.
I would support execution over a life sentence.
Did you put this one three times for emphasis ?
So basically for selfish reasons.
Ken Molestina is probably not the best name to have these days...
Seriously thought this was a joke. Nope. Dude's name literally is...ken molestina.
My fucking sides.
I personally know Kenny Molestina. Last time I saw him, he was a reporter for a TV station near where Roosh V originally resided.
He already knows all the jokes surrounding his name. Spanish surnames can be a bit hilarious.
In his case, "Molestar" is Spanish for "to bother". Sound normal in Spanish but has a more negative connotation in English.
Dudes name was Shaun platt
And the reporters name was.....
Yeah, was just clarifying bro
If you are an Uber driver having a always-on voice recorder is probably the least you should do if not having a camera there too.
Given his looks and hers I rather suspect he turned her down and this is what happened afterwards.
Also all the manipulative bitches have this weird kind of gesturing to them. How she holds her head up in an arrogant way and this very specific controlled arm/hand movements. Creeps me out.
Follow the GPS: Omg he must not know where the fuck he's going Doesn't follow gps: Omg he must be trying to rape me
I worked for Lyft for about two months in a large American city before my rating tanked. If nothing else, that kind of job teaches you how to handle entitled women who believe that you, her male driver, were placed on this earth for the sole purpose of carting her ass to her destination and to do it as quickly and efficiently as possible. Let's just say that if you're in my car and you show the slightest hint of disrespect while I'm doing you a service, you will be booted right the fuck out, even if we're on a highway.
they had to fire her.
one of the news stations had a video of them talking about it... when the cops got there, she told them one story that basically said all this shit about him. then they asked him what happened, he pulled out an audio recording that proved much of what she just told the cops was false.
you can't have a DA who is on record making false statements to a police officer.
Yes they definitely make sure their false statements are not recorded. Cops, criminals, women, proesecutors, all of them are the same. All of them lie all the time and without shame.
Her: ‘Who are they gonna believe, you or me?’
Right there is the arrogance that feminism / society has taught women they can get away with even when they know they are totally in the wrong.
Him: And I said, ‘You know what, you’re kind of right,’ ” Platt told ABC News. “So I took out my phone and I recorded it.”
Guy is a fucking genius.
And the real sting for her? She got owned by a blue collar Uber driver who she thought was beneath her.
Agree. If people can't see the problem with that statement then I don't know what else to do. That's exactly what should be pointed out.
In most situations, I would agree, but in her case: 1. She used her position to threaten him, 2. She made a false allegation and 3. her job is a DA. Such a person should not hold such a position.
Can Uber drivers refuse to drive drunk people home? I think I would pass on driving drunk women.
Don't think so, often the point of Uber is not having to drive. Perhaps if you find the client threatening or with generally inappropriate behavior, but just because a person is drunk it's kind of a dick move.
Uber can actually deny people if they are too drunk, so that they don't risk having a passenger who throws up in their car.
All the accusations being thrown around of late is really bothering me. As a mother to a daughter that actually was sexually assaulted at 14, these fake allegations really cast a light on the actual victims and the actual person assaulting. My husband refuses to have a conversation with any of his female subordinates without another female in the room to cover his ass. Since in this day and age, in situations in regards to any type of sexual assault or harassment, it is character assassination and a weapon.
The penalty of the false accusation should be the same as the crime itself. Because by destroying the credibility of actual rape victims they are perpetuating rape.
Exactly. I never understood why that's not a law. It's common sense. If a woman was found to have been lying about rape, punish her. It won't prevent people who have truly been raped from coming forward. It will prevent the women looking for a paycheck
My cousin got falsely accused. I'll never forget this. He lost his football scholarship and got kicked out of the school. Not to mention he spent some time in jail before his actual trial. Plus that shit stuck on his record.
Overtime it was proven the chick was lying (had multiple semen samples in her panties on the night of).
Asked him why didn't he try and get her thrown in jail. He said at that point he spent so much time through the process, legal fees, and all that, that he just felt it wasn't worth pursing.
I truly believe they should serve the same time punishment. I don't know why they don't. We really need to stop catering to women.
Yeah....we are actually upset about this too. Rape is a serious thing and so is sexual assault--when all these shitheads are using it to try to gain some advantage for themselves it destroys the credibility of women who really have been hurt. It's fucked. It's bad for men and women.
This comment times 1000. This is exactly why I had such a huge issue with the whole "meToo" movement.
Because whether these ladies realize it or not, they are negatively affecting the REAL rape/sexAssualt victims.
It makes it twice as hard for me to take that shit serious when I see attention whores claiming they been assaulted.
So in reality they are doing more damage then good. They are pretty much mocking sexual assault and rape and not even realizing it.
Not going to report this post (unless this comment is downvoted), but FYI it is a rule here to post sexless. Any point that needs "as a mother" that wouldn't stand on its own would be removed. This point would stand on its own, so I'm not reporting it. But again, it's a rule for a reason.
Glad you're here to learn.
My apologies, I didnt realize that was a rule.
No. No respect for white knights that vouch for pussy pass. This is beta behavior. She should be shit canned and he should also demand an apology.
Fuck that.
Bitch tries to ruin his life-she SHOULD be fired.
Your comparison to feminist's actions is irrelevant.
If a man tries to falsely ruin a woman's life-he deserves to be fired too.
Get your head out of your ass.
It seems like a huge ethical breach, something the bar association wouldn't look at too favorably. She really should be disbarred, I mean, considering her behavior here, who knows what other malfeasance she's been up to in regards to her previous cases?
fuck dude. solid reminder/eye opener. upvoted
Reminds me of a post a few weeks ago on here about treating women like your daughters. You don't express anger at them. You express disappointment so they feel bad about what they did and "want to make daddy proud".
Also kudos to the driver for not being sadistic and being reasonable about the whole thing.. ironically more reasonable than this psycho who works in the legal system.
Why Uber is so popular among sluts? I mean, I live in Ukraine and even here Uber's TV ad shows a bunch of drunken cunts who need to get to the night club. It's not as popular as regular taxis here, however.
Don't watch TV but I'm curious, is Uklon (the Ukrainian version of Uber for those unaware) advertising in a similar fashion?
Never saw their ads. In fact, I never heard about it. I don't watch TV often, but my mom does, and she never heard about it too. Uber had appeared on Ukrainian market about a year ago. Their TV ads always feature a bunch of women who want to "have fun" but cannot have it at home so they take an Uber taxi. Kinda strange, since there are many kinds of people who use taxi.
Good points.
I thought her tears were crocodile tears too.... when she realises she's actually going to be held responsible for her actions ...
Stories like this are why I spend more time over at MGTOW.
Sounded like a drunk entitled cunt.
First of all, she's extremely unnatractive, who'd want anything to do with that? Add that with her personality and you have one hell of a monster.
[Edited] phone fucked up.
I'm glad she lost her job. She clearly demonstrated that she is incapable of working in law/public service. But it's a good call on the drivers part to ask for a genuine apology.
I hope this serves as a warning for anyone else who tries to pull this shit. We get it, your sad and need that adrenaline rush in your life.
If you're alone with someone you don't know, be careful.
I hope he gets compensated for this.
I've been debating posting this here! That guy is one of my good friends from school. The guy is doing his best to better himself. He seems to have bad luck that follows him around. This is not the kind of attention he was looking for because he's gotten so many threats from random people who doesn't know a damn thing about what kind of guy he is.
Also there were no reprocussions for him other than dealing with her and having everyone in the world talking about it.
"I'm sorry she lost her job, but you dont treat people like that"
We are on the verge of a dark, even melancholic days. Brace yourselves.
I'm definitely adding "honest apology" to my vocabulary thanks to that guy
Everything with women is about sex. Had that man not recorded that incident authorities would have easily sided with her. She'll take being the victim to her grave.
She apologized to the DA but not to the Uber driver and attempts to paint herself as the victim. My career is over waaah waaaah, it's not my fault, I didn't feel safe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chO7aVaCcUU
She said "That's not me." They all say that. Every woman caught misbehaving while drunk says that. Listen for it.
Problem is, it IS her. "In wine, there is truth," is a profound statement.
She cried during the press conference after she got fired... so cringe
For the life of me I can't figure out why on earth this woman was so angry? What would make you treat a uber driver so awful? What in your life is that bad? Women like this make other women look bad.
"manipulative" is my trigger word. I propose we use the more active term - womanipulative
Wow, what a fucking cunt. You can tell from her body language and words the ONLY thing she regrets is getting CAUGHT. No remorse whatsoever that she could have decimated this guy's life forever.
When they said she was fired I got a justice semi.
Other news report says she has already got job offers from other counties and has other DA's defending her. Lets be honest here, given the excuse she gave in her press conference about how she did not feel safe and was scared. If that recording was not there he would be in jail for some sex crime.
Look men, in payment for all the oppression that males have given females through history, we are being marginalized in Western society. We need to stop participating in our own demise. Had I found these groups prior to this marriage, I would still be single (and I so deeply regret that, but whatever).
If you can't change the rules to make things even, don't play the game. It's really the only option (create your own game).
What oppression???
Paying for them, supporting them, dying for them. While they sat around at home, play with the kids (the smart ones make the kids play with each other or the dog), maybe iron a shirt, and claim they are doing "the hardest job in the world". A job that 99% of women manage to do just fine.
The only "oppression" we've inflicted on women is asking for a little sexual fidelity in exchange for our support, and that's so we know our children are our own.
Instead look at how women have treated men in history - sexual lies, teasing, passive aggressiveness.... even going so far as to pretend that "women don't enjoy sex" in order to secure payment for their meagre services.
Don't believe the myth of millennia of female oppression. Men have contributed more than women throughout history.
The myth of female oppression exists to justify claiming present day resources from us. Make us feel guilty so we will accept repayment to them. Despite these alleged/manufactured crimes not even having been perpetrated by us.
Any woman claiming she's been oppressed for millions of years should be countered with "men have died to support you, it's your turn to take on the burden of risk".
Women were "oppressed" throughout history, that is true. But it is only one side of the story.
While women were being "oppressed" (e.g., not allowed to vote, no legal rights, utter disgrace in divorce, etc.), men were being "oppressed" as well: dying in wars, sacrificing their own comfort for the good of their tribe/town/country, shouldering all the heavy lifting (literally and figuratively), building empires, etc (paying, supporting, dying, like you said).
So sure, women were not "equal" to men. But if women can force men to pay for that, then I want repatriation for all my ancestors who died on the battlefield or while hunting the saber tooth while all the women folk were safe at home knitting.
In order for the world to right itself, we must go back to the old imbalance. Because the new imbalance is tearing our society apart. No actual balance, or equality, is possible.
"For one sexual strategy to succeed, the other sexual strategy must fail or compromise."
Superior, in most ways. Having an easy life with no risk handed to you hardly makes you in an inferior position.
Exactly.
I'm going to adopt your phrasing from now on :)
The factors tearing the new balance apart aren't going to end anytime soon, sadly.
The old way kinda sucked too. One woman for life and not much sex.
I prefer the new way, although I wish it was better for children.
Right. And sadly this has to also extend to laws and social constructs.
Agreed. Out of the spotlight, but also out of harm's way.
Not accurate. If you read about sex in history, even lower- to middle-class men typically had more than one wife or concubines and saw prostitutes as needed. It was only in the last 500 years, and mostly in Europe, where non-monogamous or pleasure-based sex was demonized (thank you Christianity). For the vast majority of history, sex has been viewed not as an evil but a need, and every culture has dealt with it in their own way.
So there were more women than men? Or did lots of men go without?
This is what happens in atheist driven society. Rejection of religious values leads to divergence of relations in men and women.
Religion is typically promoted by atheists as the worst thing in the world, just important for all the atheists out there (I'm more agnostic-atheist, don't hate religious people just don't believe any of it) that religion does play a role in setting gender roles and behaviors, which otherwise turns to gender anarchy with a loss of values.
Disagree. Religion forces certain sexual behaviors, patterns, and rules. Without religion a society turns either to hedonism or finds balance.
The best societies honored sex of all kinds as a religious practice.
Why didn’t he take her home? They mentioned he picked her up from the bar but refused to take her home. Why?
He was, but he used a different route that princess didn’t approve of..,
She is a DA. Of course she knows the roads better than a driver /s