~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
live_full
[+]Ransom_Stoddard 11 years ago [recovered] (30 children) | Copy Link
"... but it's different when it's a woman ...", says most women.
[+]I-Cut-Myself 11 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
I get a twitch when someone says that
[–]Ctrl_Alt_Del_Esc 50 points51 points52 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh no make sure it's not a wink because you'll get charged with sexual harassment
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
My wife tells me about different things all the time. We make the same mistake, somehow it's different when I do it.
BEST EXAMPLE EVER: I wanted a cookie. Asked her: Where are the cookies. "I ate it". 10 minutes later I see the cookies out of coincidence. "Hey, you lied about the cookies!" She: "Do you see what you made me do? You made me lie about the cookies".
Because she wanted to keep them (which wouldn't have been a problem. Being the good beta that I am, I'm always less important) she lied. Correction. She HAD to lie to me.
I made her lie
ISN'T THIS FUCKING GREAT?
[–]WisdomModifier 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Did you set the cookies on fire?
[–]jvardrake 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
...and then eat the flaming cookies.
That would be such an awesome display of how hardcore you are about cookies. Ain't nothing going to stop you from getting them! Not her lying about their f'ing existence! Not even them being on goddamn FIRE!
ArRRRHHGGHH!
[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'd rather have a dollar
[–]farkface 45 points46 points47 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You see confinement takes privilege plus power, and since women have no privilege they are incapable of truly confining a man. Even when the man is locked in a room, he is still locked in there with his privilege so he is still in a better situation than a free woman.
[–]Old_Army90 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not if he's locked in there with his privilege. Then his privilege overwhelms him and he collapses on himself like a star.
We are all victims of da patriarkey
[–]Kdawg493 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pay-tree-R-key
[–]avantvernacular 78 points79 points80 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Most men say that. We got a long ways to go.
[–]Ransom_Stoddard42 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Most people say that. I agree, we got a long way to go.
[–]Erociter 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Men have been told by many women, that they must care for and protect those women above other concerns.
Of course some men say this, because to show concern for other men is not to put their concern for women above all else.
They feel what they've been taught a 'real man' (as defined by those women) does.
Yeah, we do have a long ways to go.
[–]AdvocateForTulkas 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We're far past that. This is clearly an issue perpetuated by both genders, it's not even close to having a visible origin point.
[–]thingamabobby 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Didn't this sort of mentality exist before feminism, though? It's just that the mindset of 'protect women' stayed while everything else changed.
[–]Erociter 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, it did definitely exist before feminism.
Feminism's just a modified riff on a very old song.
[–]Kdawg493 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Misogyny declined, but the benefits of chivalry which is also sexist but benefits some stayed. Both genders share the blame for chivalry not being standard for both genders.
[–]benjimann91 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In my experience, men say this more than women do. And both say it too much.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Damn I know you didn't mean that but that grates a nerve so fucking much.
[–]TheMer0vingian 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"But it's different when it's a woman" is a phrase that only applies in reference to a woman being asked to be held accountable for her actions. If it's something where men are perceived to have any advantage because of their difference in gender, either real or imagined, it then suddenly becomes "Men and women are exactly the same, gender is a mere construct of the patriarchy. Any advantage ever given to a man is sexism and disgusting bigotry!"
Feminists not only want to keep the privileges that are inherent to women, but they want to have all the privileges that are inherent to men as well, except without any of the male responsibility. They want to be viewed as equals only when it comes to things that benefit their circumstance, but then treated as delicate little flowers who should be granted special treatment because of their gender when it comes to anything that doesn't benefit them.
[–]ghosttrainhobo 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Why don't people realize that there are no differences between men and women?
[–]Kdawg493 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Except for genetalia, bone structure, periods, maturity rates...
Just kidding. I get what you mean.
[–]Phoxxent 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Eh, screw that maturity rates nonsense. The only way females mature faster is as far as reproduction goes. To just say general "maturity" gives the wrong impression.
[–]jacob8015 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Men and women are very different though. Their brains are wired differently and the hormones that influence their thoughts are different.
Neither is really better but they are both different.
[–]cl3ft 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
And due to this, men are more violent and also put themselves at risk of violence by more risk taking behaviours.
[–]_RAPE_RAPE_RAPE 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
bitches be crazy, though
[–]skabbo 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Mmhm, conversely due to this women are more likely to kill their own children.
[–]cl3ft -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the first year yes. After that it reverses. And can be largely overcome by allowing them reproductive rights in the first place.
[–]Kdawg493 -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Maybe I'm becoming like the feminazi landwhales, but saying stuff so blatantly sexist like that triggers me.
[–]PaintAndPlastic 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are not "triggered". Triggering is what happens when you have a legitimate case of PTSD.
[–]hork23 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They leave out the part explaining that it's different because of the way we react to it. That would be honest though and wouldn't treat women special.
[+]Aidyyyy 11 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
Is there a video for this? I'd like to see it.
[–]ilikecigarettes 69 points70 points71 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PR5ryhnYtQ
[–]digglez 76 points77 points78 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What a nightmare, they are talking about black eyes and shes sitting there nodding like shes proud of it... roles switched feminists would castrate a guy.
[–]Dr_Merkwurdigliebe 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"She used to say I was the bad one because I used to put my fist through walls and punch doors, but I'd rather do that than hit her."
Staying the bigger person.
[–]Cheesemacher 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The audience's reaction must have been at least partly nervous laughter. When someone casually and suddenly says something so shocking you might just involuntarily let out a laugh - and then immediately feel bad.
[–]Aidyyyy 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Cheers!
[–]ILoveCheers 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I love that show!
[–]outcastded 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Comments are disabled for this video.
Fuck that shit. That's what you see on Anita Sarkeesian videos.
[–]euclagarcia -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Did anyone else have an incredibly hard time understanding what the guest was saying lol
[–]PigEqualsBakon 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not really, most of what he said was in the post.
[–]Nikolaibr 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Aidyyyy 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks!
[–]tallwheel 48 points49 points50 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How many times do we have to say it? Just try reversing the genders. So much more compassion could be had if people would just try really truly reversing the genders in their heads and considering how they would react with the genders reversed. If it wouldn't be the same, then you need to ask why not? Ideally, you should be equally compassionate toward both genders.
[–]hork23 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What's the most common response when someone says reverse the genders? It's either ignoring that part or special pleading. It's not the same since we don't react to it the same, otherwise the same event occurred just to different people. People will lie to themselves to try to remain consistent, they hate the cognitive dissonance when their hypocrisy is exposed but it's hard work to fix it in a logical and moral manner. I don't think many people will even try that hard.
[–]Raunien 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"But it's not the same!"
How? How is it not the same? If are to assume that, at the most basic level, men and women are essentially equal, then please tell me why it is wrong to swap them. Please tell me how 2/2 = 1, but x + 2/2 =/= x + 1
Last I checked, when you swap two equivalent things, the result should be the same!
This kind of hypocrisy REALLY fucks me off.
[–]zyguy 28 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I thought the same thing in the ant-man trailer when Paul Rudd asks Evangeline Lilly to show him how to punch, implying her to punch his hand. She punches him square in the face, theaters laugh. They'd gasp if it was gender swapped. Like even if she shook it off like he did, the audience would still see her as this weaker sex and it would demonize the male character.
[–]greatestbass 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's the catch 22. They say they are equal, but then female violence is okay because they are the weaker sex.
[–]greatestbass 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Jeremy Kyle is like Jerry Springer except he doesn't let women throw punches at men. Great show if you've never watched it and love white trash TV.
[+]Akasha20 -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It's about as white trash as you get in a country with no white trash.
[–]Fallout 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There are definitely white trash here.
[–]Enzemo 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure that I would classify as white trash
[–]Akasha20 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah what I mean is that's not a phrase we use here.
[–]Fallout 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True, we just call them chavs :)
[–]kingwaller99 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
chavs = U.K white trash
[–]cynicalsimon 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
PRAISE THIS MAN
[–]killinblow 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Not really.. hes a dick, but hes right on this one.
[–]cynicalsimon 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I know nothing about him. I just like that post and what he said in it allot
[–]itsamealex 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What's an allot?
[–]TheBuzwell 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
meh
[–]Deimos_F 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh boy, that was a stern remark.
I hope no one in the audience felt... triggered.
[–]JoanneKerlot 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's a cunt, but he makes a very valid point.
[–]Vanriel 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow. For the first time i find myself agreeing with jeremy kyle...
[–]PerfectHair 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As much as I hate the Jeremy Kyle show, I will forever give him props for this moment.
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
He tell's the story - Audience is laughing - Moderator gives them shit - Audience is clapping.
I PROMISE you that we hear the same people clapping that have laughed before.
It's like there are no brains inside. You put "Feelz" inside and you get a reaction. And that reaction has no context whatsoever.
[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know that these card-guys are there. But there should be some free will left anyway.
[–]Headchopperz 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
they usually do that but jeremy kyle doesnt
[–]Tdeuce16 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why are there captions underneath the other captions?
[–]romulusnr 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why is there another set of subtitles under the captions that say things like "You're a violent cheat" and "I hope the baby's mine" ? o_o
[–]PerfectHair 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's the heading for that section of the episode. The episode would most likely have been "You're a violent cheat but I hope the baby's mine" indicating that, as much as he hates his ex, he wants to be there for the kid, which frankly I respect.
[–]pupunoob 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The worst part was the audience had the audacity to clap after that. Loke seriously?
[–]sizzletron 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Every indication exists that the modern human is stupider than ever. The majority is plain dull. Flouncing about in a bit of science trivia is all most people attempt. I've given up on humanity. Fucking amber the place.
[–]S-BRO 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Jezza always slams his audiences for this.
[–]shameless8914 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
God.. I cant help but feel like the feminists are winning at times.. is there any proof that we are making progress? I am genuinely concerned.
[–]MR_Movement -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
We have been at war for a long time but only one side has known it. Unfortunately, we have awoken to find our asses being handed to us. Yes, the feminists are winning. Once we organize and start fighting back though the tides will change quickly.
[–]Kurwasaki12 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Kenji who let you back on the internet.
[–]MR_Movement -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How about make sense when you are in public.
[–]Kurwasaki12 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Im referencing a visual novel character.
[+]Spurnout -20 points-19 points-18 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Maybe I'm just a dick but I find it funny whether it's a guy or girl.
[–]IlleFacitFinem 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Unfortunately you are a sociopath.
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
No, I don't think so.
[–]IlleFacitFinem -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
you lack a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. you are a sociopath.
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Based on one example, you are incorrect and making a logical fallacy. But go on, continue to explain how you know me so well.
[–]IlleFacitFinem -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
My bad, I was making an assumption that you are a consistent person.
Your behavior in this case is in line with that of a person who has little regard or concern for other people.
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Shows how little your world is.
[–]KRosen333 -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
low effort post.
[+][deleted] 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mekisteus 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not even close. It's because Tom's ultimate goal is to eat Jerry, while Jerry is just trying to survive.
[–]Dr_Merkwurdigliebe 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men's ultimate goal is to rape and enslave all women and women just want to survive.
/s
[–]HaroldOfTheRocks 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because all men are at least x strong.
And all women are <x strong.
And that's bullshit. How about "People shouldn't hit people, and the people who do should be punished equally"?
[–]60for30 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Those are cartoons, not battered humans.
Grow some empathy.
[–]hork23 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"You can't reverse these roles because men and women aren't interchangeable."
Agreed, anyone can see this all over the place just by looking at the reaction to men being hurt. Women are treated like children while men are tolerated at best.
"People view woman-on-man violence differently because men are more physically powerful than women."
Not the sole or main reason but I think one of the most given explanations because it's so shallow and people don't think deeper into why women are special compared to men.
"It's funny when Jerry beats Tom because Tom is bigger."
Have to disagree. Fuck that cunt, Jerry.
[–]shameless8914 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Feel better now? You've proven nothing. The fact is, this man had to jump out of a fucking building to escape the cage she placed him in. Physiological attributes are no longer in play. The fact is, if a man had done this to a woman, he wouldn't see the outside of prison bars for years. This is our point, the system is clearly in favor of women. Men's struggle is literally "laughable" in today's society. Even when we have to jump out of buildings, it is laughable. But according to you, since he was stronger it shouldn't matter as much. So what? He breaks down the door, thats probably damage to property along with additional jail time. Hell, maybe he even shoves his way out since he is stronger. This is MORE jail time. Get the picture?
[–]remotaholic 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your logic is flawed. If a man is stronger than a woman, and the woman attacks him, she is likely to use weapons such as shoes or household items that can inflict a lot of pain. However the man is not allowed to fight back, because he is stronger than her..?
[–]Raunien 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ah, Poe, we meet again.
[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Poe's law:
Poe's law is an internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extremism are indistinguishable from sincere expressions of extremism. Poe's Law implies that parody will often be mistaken for sincere belief, and sincere beliefs for parody.
Poe's law is an internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extremism are indistinguishable from
sincere expressions of extremism. Poe's Law implies that parody will often be mistaken for sincere belief, and sincere beliefs for parody.
Interesting: UFO Phil | Christwire | Landover Baptist Church
Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words
[+]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -73 points-72 points-71 points 11 years ago* (64 children) | Copy Link
reddit sucks. ya'll are cunts.
[–]garbledcluster 37 points38 points39 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
This is from a British TV show though. Not the biggest fan of Jeremy Kyle but I'm glad to see him standing up for the abused man.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Well, I guess my statement applies to the entire planet, not just the USA.
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Brazilian here. Yes, it applies to us too.
[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cool, thanks, but I'm straight bro. Cheers.
[–]CttCJim 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I was about to say "Western Society", but I guess South America is in on the fun as well. Lovely. Or are you considered part of "the west"? I'm never clear on that.
[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I want to say "the west" mostly refers to like the US, Canada, and most of Europe. Maybe parts of the Middle East and Egypt. But I'm not sure at all.
[–]CttCJim 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Google says:
west
noun the western part of the world or of a specified country, region, or town. "it will become windy in the west" Europe and its culture seen in contrast to other civilizations. noun: the West historical the noncommunist states of Europe and North America, contrasted with the former communist states of eastern Europe.
noun: the West synonyms: Occident, Western nations "commercialism in the West"
[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So there you go. I guess I was pretty close.
[–]60for30 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
South America is considered to be part of the Western world and society, yeah.
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Being in São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro feels just like being in any other major violent western city.
[–]friskybadger 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I'm curious to see how shitty and stupid your original comment was that you got this many downvotes
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I pointed out the current state of absurdity in the US/world, and worded it very poorly. Reddit loves to downvote people for speaking the truth if they don't say it in the right way.
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I'm scared to ask what absurdity you were referring to
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Just current problems that we should be dealing with.
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
What problems?
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't remember everything I listed. Men's rights, fat acceptance, police brutality, the war on drugs, war in general, its all absurd. That's all I was saying.
[–]friskybadger 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Whats wrong with men's rights? The are certain areas of our society that grant lenience to people just because they are women (primarily the justice system). Just like women should be treated the same as men in politics and academia, women should be trialed and sentenced the same as men.
Those other things are absolutely absurd.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
lol, see what I mean about poorly worded? It is absurd that more and more people are forgetting that men and women have equal rights, regardless of the situation. That's what I meant.
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
oh ok
[–]Anathema_Redditus 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
Police brutality is waay overblown, actually.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link
How so? Even though it doesn't happen as often as people claim, it still flat out shouldn't happen. Ever. I bet if someone close to you got terrorized by the police you would think differently.
[–]Anathema_Redditus 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
It shouldn't, I agree. But sometimes police brutaliy HAS to happen in order to subdue a violent suspect or protect the public.
To illustrate how much police brutality actually happens, see this (copypasta'ed from /u/ItwasDumblydore)
Sheer number of murders, Do you know how many cops we have in the world, lets just get an estimate of USA which out of the first world nations has the most (but also has a giant population).
401 cops per 100,000 people
USA's population is 319,000,000/100,000 = 3190 x 401.
1,279,190 Million Cops
1100~ Cases of Cops killing people in USA in 2014 (this includes people who where armed / police brutality/ect). But lets say these where all brutality cases.
1100/1,279,190 = 0.00085991916
0.086% of cops have killed a civilian.
And of right now USA is currently at 1/2 of what we had in 2014 and close to 2013/2012/2011/2010? And out of those 1100, a lot of them didn't go without consequence if they where a crime.
I am not saying there isn't corruption and shitty things happen, but when this shit happens it's cops putting cops on trial, if you where in the jury and the person on trial was a friend or a nice work colleague, etc. Without substantial proof you will find it hard to believe, the cop is going to say his side of the story that will make him look good. Or are you going to punish your friend/work colleague off people trying to start media attention?
Also 600 gun accidents happen a year, I guess everyone in USA should get rid of their guns? (As a Canadian I'm not going to touch gun control subject)
Fuck Vending machines kill more then sharks do, we have to get rid of those too.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link
This mentality is toxic. "It doesn't happen that much, so its not so bad." These things are symptoms of a much deeper issue. Do we or do we not need to nip it in the bud?
[–]Anathema_Redditus 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
How is it toxic? Police brutality IS very rare.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link
The fact that it is rare doesn't make it okay! I'm sure if you were the victim of police brutality you would be thinking differently.
[–]Anathema_Redditus 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
IF I were brutalized by the police, it would depend on the situation in which I was brutalized.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
Okay. Put yourself in this womans shoes. Now how do you feel?
[–]ItWasDumblydore 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (26 children) | Copy Link
That comment was to someone finding alright to say kill cops because of what 0.089% do. So you agree we should slump 0.089% of the cops with the 99.911% of the cops who try to uphold the law.
None of these things are alright, but people and the media are trying to make it seem like Cops are just this..
By overblown it means, it's being exaggerated and it is, why haven't people cared about police brutality in the previous years where the cops have killed (armed and non armed civilians) (2015/2013-2010) But it wasn't the biggest issue 2014 where it was at a record twice as higher then usual? But now in 2015 we suddenly care so much because of a few cases where they didn't get in trouble... how about the good chunk over the years who have been punished that never see the day of news?
What about the over 1100 cases of murder on homicide between civilians with fire arms?
What about the over 1100 cases of murder on homicide between civilians with weapons? (knifes/ect/ect)
Or what about the 1.3% of women and 0.9% who get physically abused in relationships?
These are all issues to oh and that's 2.2% out of 319,000,000 versus 0.086% of 1,279,190.
All the things are issues but now we have a bunch of people think death to the cops because of what 0.086% do. They should be taken seriously but don't fucking propagandize cops into being horrible human beings, when the majority who do commit the acts shown do get in trouble, but because the news wants to pick cases where they don't get in trouble, boom cops are suddenly Hitler! Wait... wait Doctors accidently kill people at a higher rate... GUYS GUYS DOCTORS ARE HITLER TOO NOW DON'T TRUST DOCTOR- WAIT A NURSE MURDERED SOMEONE DON'T TRUST NURSES EITHER!
TLDR: Dont paint a broad brush over anyone, it doesn't solve the problem you just sound like a fucker who says all blacks are criminals.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
http://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/38k7i0/shocking_new_video_shows_unarmed_utah_man_was/
There must be nothing we can do to prevent things like this from happening, huh?
idiot.
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Thanks for not paying attention.
I'm saying it's not as big as the media and people are making it doesn't mean it isn't a problem.
Oh great video by the way
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=31772096
Someone called saying someone had a gun
Police asks him to stop walking and put his hands down on the ground
Turns around says "No fool and looks like he is pulling something out"
Figures out he doesn't have a gun and starts giving him first aid, saying "Stay with me, Stay with me buddy". Fuck that monster seriously fuck him and his family and his children for a civilian that possibly could've had a gun, when there has been a report of a gun. Where is his sense of humanity with his battle cry as he tries to give him first aid "stay with me buddy" this is Hitler shit.
Well thanks for shooting yourself in the foot.
I sincerely hope you don't have an altercation with the police.
Well good thing i wont disagree with the police and just listen to him/her? And if it was unjust get the commonly 100k to millions those cases can get?
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
... what if you don't get the chance?
Then I'm up to what ever he does? I'm not going to worry about a 0.08% (not 8% but 0.08%) chance that happens and out of those 1100 cases about 400 cases of reported police brutality, lets be an asshole and say 200 of them where kills that 0.08% just got a lot smaller going down to 0.015%) and then we compare that to living in Canada is 75 (Innocent or guilty) people last year out of 35,160,000, for every 100,000 there is 206 officers making it 73k cops, that further reduced my chances to 0.0102. And that would be stating if all 75 cops where unjustified. At that point should I worry about food because of the 10x the people who die to food related instances like choking/raw meat/ect?
Jesus christ, you are thick.
Right I should worry about a 0.01% chance of something happening.
If he shoots I'm dead and what ever i want really doesn't matter if I don't live. I'm an Ex-Person, I am no more. Sure it sucks but guess what it's not like i have control of it, if he's some murderous cop?
Putting someone in a situation like that makes no sense? You put me in the situation of the outcome has happened and I got shot? What else am I supposed to do, wish on the also maybe possible 0.01% chance I become super man? Oh oh no that I was wearing bullet proof Kevlar at the time! Or it wasn't actually me it was my evil twin?
There you go there is my response to what I would do if I don't get a chance and get shot and die. I would die
What the fuck are you talking about?
All I was ever saying is that abuse of authority is not okay and should be prevented at all costs. If you disagree, you must not care about your fellow man. The fact that the cops who do these horrible things get away with them is a growing problem. Ignoring it is not the way to go.
You said what happens if they don't give me the chance and just shoot, then I'm fucking dead. All of them get away? because three things on the news saying oh a cop shot someone and he wasn't convicted?
2012: Ramarley Graham, 18, was fatally shot in the chest by NYPD Officer Richard Haste in a bathroom of his home. Haste claimed Graham had a weapon although none were found on Graham's body. In 2015, Graham's family received a $3.9 million lawsuit settlement from the NYPD.
April 2013: In Marion, mentally disabled 40-year-old Melissa Davis was stopped when walking from one house to another. Officers Franklin Brown and Eric Walters unnecessarily shocked her 8 times with a taser, even after she was already in handcuffs. On April 27, 2015, both were sentenced to over a year in prison (Brown to 18 months) after pleading guilty to deprivation of rights under color of law. As of that time, a civil suit was still pending.
September 3, 2014: In Columbia, 35-year-old Levar Jones was wounded after being shot once and missed three times by Trooper Sean Groubert. Groubert stopped Jones for a seatbelt violation and asked Jones for his driver's license. After Jones walked to his car to retrieve his license, Groubert fired four shots at Jones, with at least one of the rounds being fired as Jones raised his hands in the air. Later that month, Groubert was fired from his job and charged with assault and battery of high nature. In February 2015, Jones was awarded $250,000 from a lawsuit settlement.
Ignoring it isn't the way to go, if you where paying attention I agreed with it. But blowing the problem up make it sound like every cop is a fucking murderer with no soul or humanity left in him, calling out to kill cops and their families, putting up bounties on cops aren't going to make the situation better as people paint the broad brush over all the cops because of the 0.08% isn't the god damn fucking solution either. Was the point I was making when I said that and adding clarification where that quote came from when he quoted me.
Or are you arguing the fact we should do all the above and harass all the cops because of the 99.92% who do their job and have nothing to do with the person who did shoot at the innocent person and put the blame on all of them?
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Dude, holy fucking shit. I know that sometimes cops get punished for their wrongdoing, as they should. You are literally choosing to be as ignorant as possible about this. It is a legitimate problem, you are acting like it isn't. Denial is unhealthy.
Your walls of text are chock full of syntax error and typos, it is very hard to take you seriously.
Right, so you agree we should also harass the 99.92% of cops who don't do these things? (two can play at not reading everything someone says, also it's hard to take you seriously with all the logic fallacies you manage to push out but guess what I still do.) But lets make this clear to you
My comment he quoted was posted because someone said cops are pretty much all murderous ass holes. That quote instead shows only 0.08% of them actually fatally shoot someone.
I said we shouldn't ignore this issue, but WE also shouldn't blow it up to the issue it isn't (aka the majority of cops are taken as soulless murderers doesn't help either) especially when the media pushes it to the point it causes civilians to now harass the 99.92% of cops who don't do this shit?
Extra: The Fallacies committed
Strawman/Special Pleading: "This mentality is toxic. "It doesn't happen that much, so its not so bad." These things are symptoms of a much deeper issue. Do we or do we not need to nip it in the bud?". This mentality is toxic, if it doesn't happen that much so it's not so bad.
Your trying to make a guy who's point saying police brutality is overblown not that it isn't a issue into something related to the argument. Your also moving the goal posts so your argument which has no basis on the argument of how often police brutality actually happens vs should it happen is two different subjects
Ad Hominems: "Jesus christ, you are thick" ". You are literally choosing to be as ignorant as possible about this. It is a legitimate problem, you are acting like it isn't. Denial is unhealthy." "idiot."
Why does your thoughts of how intelligent I am, or calling me ignorant for saying that it is a problem that has to be dealt with but we don't need to blow it up to the situation that people think all cops are murders is any good?. Denial is unhealthy then why did you deny my argument that police brutality doesn't happen as often as people think it does? Unhealthy because of how I think, are you just saying I'm not right in the head and how does that push my argument from being true... if a serial killer told you not to kill, it's alright to kill because it's someone who isn't mentally healthy in the head?
Loaded Question/Ancedotal: "Okay. Put yourself in this womans shoes. Now how do you feel?"
If anyone said anything other then horrible. They would look like they where in the wrong. What's the point of this other then to push your point across that it's a serious issue that no-one is saying it isn't? Also your cherry picking situations where people didn't get punished, in which I showed cops do indeed get punished.
Appeal to Emotion: Your points pretty much, Cops murdering people is bad, this has nothing to do with how often it happens and how much people blow it out of proportion.
No True Scotsman: "You are literally choosing to be as ignorant as possible about this. It is a legitimate problem, you are acting like it isn't. Denial is unhealthy.",
Don't fucking act like your better then someone ever... how I think isn't up for you to judge. Your not perfect person by name calling me which would be something you think the police do too I bet bullying everyone? And here you are trying to act better then me instead of putting a counter point too by insulting me.
Cop Brutality isn't as high as people think.
Cop Brutality is a problem, but it isn't going to be solved by treating them all like shit and soulless serial killers.
Cherry picking: All your links, keep finding sources that prove your point not that is a collection of things that go with and against your point.
Personal Incredulity: "Your walls of text are chock full of syntax error and typos, it is very hard to take you seriously."
So my arguments aren't to be taken seriously because of the errors? I guess since you made errors too I shouldn't take you seriously... no that's just pure fucking stupidity.
So you know what instead of trying to deal with your stupid argument of it's bad trying to appeal to nature and emotion, yes we all know a cop murdering someone is bad and we should try to solve the problem but that isn't the argument.
THE ARGUMENT IN BOLD SO YOU CAN READ IT
Do you think cops murdering people is being blown out of proportion when random cops are being killed and harassed for trying to do their job based of the 0.08% who might have abused their situation of power. Versus the 99.92% who haven't even killed another person? That is the argument... fight that and stop trying to push the argument elsewhere. I've answered your little sidetracked argument time after time but you just chose to ignore it.
No, I don't agree with that. You seriously have the biggest stick up your ass about this.
Seriously, what the fuck are you on? Pass me what you're smoking.
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Alright then so the 99.92% who are also getting targeted by harassment and also murdered because of this is alright and are all part of the problem too? So if a small majority of people do something wrong the majority should be blamed too?
Hey. Guy. You're talkin' nonsense.
How am I talking nonsense?
You are spitting out statistics. Statistics have nothing to do with whether someones actions are right or wrong. Police Brutality, no matter how rare, is always wrong.
/u/friskybadger put it eloquently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1UjKqzVDCw&feature=youtu.be[1] How can you justify an act such as this through numbers alone? This also went down as a "Justifiable Homicide". If THIS is justifiable, how many other cases that just say "Justifiable Homicide" on paper occurred like this or similarly to this?
You're a numbers guy, here's a site you should like http://www.killedbypolice.net/[2] up-to-date spreadsheet with all murders, containing sources, starting in 2013.
That is not the argument, but thanks for putting my 1100 in 2014 correct as "(1100) December 31, 2014" So guess what surprise surprise the numbers add up. And that video is justified if you get more then a fucking edited clip with all the facts which I showed you
Again the argument isn't about if it's wrong or not, stop trying to appeal to nature and emotions. Is it alright that the 99.92% of the cops are being harassed and murdered for something the 0.08% do?
I live in a pretty bad area, Aurora, IL to be specific. Just an hour ago my entire street was filled with cop cars, someone was getting arrested. No one harassed the officers, everything went smoothly.
Where are all of these stories of cops being harassed and murdered just for being cops? If you are a cop and do your job properly, you don't catch any flak other than what comes along with the job.
My original statement was that the Police Brutality situation is absurd. You are having an argument with yourself. Have fun with that.
http://nypost.com/2015/05/10/subway-faces-backlash-after-worker-cheers-deaths-of-2-cops/
http://nypost.com/2014/12/21/there-is-blood-on-hands-of-those-who-demanded-dead-cops/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/23/who-started-new-york-s-dead-cops-chant.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/two-uniformed-police-officers-ambushed-and-killed-in-new-york-amid-mood-of-growing-public-anger-9938071.html
Are you fucking SERIOUS? You're gonna send me four links after spewing all of that statistic garbage at me? Why don't you calculate the teeny tiny percent of a chance that a cop will be killed in such a manner and apply that to your ridiculous logic?
Are you a cop or something? Why are you so delusional about this?
You have a toxic mentality and the only way you will learn is through direct experience. I hope that never happens to you.
I've dealt with cops before, and oddly doing what they said resulted in me not being shot or getting a ticket. I mean fuck respecting people instead of trying to demonize them. Oh yeah fuck those teeny tiny percent of a huge group of people bigger then the number of cops who murder within a year chanting out to " Dead cops, when do we want them, NOW!" and people on twitter praising someone who revenge killed two police?
Again there you go attacking my character calling my mentality toxic where your in no way a better person when you try to down talk me, call me an idiot, and just insult me to make yourself feel better about the point you want to push while not pushing out any useful content.
Useful content? No one is looking at these comments. I have dealt with cops before too. Lots of times. I've also been harassed by cops for minding my own business.
I'm not trying to make myself feel better dude. I'm simply trying to help you realize the error in your mind. It's all good though.
Useful content doesn't equal people looking at it, useful content would actually be answering is it alright to harass cops based off the 0.08%? I don't care if people read this isn't you tube where i get money of views, but in an argument i want people to actually put out an answer and not dance around the subject
Also do you even read what I was actually saying U/Anathema_Redditus was in the wrong for saying since it's a issue that has a 0.08% it isn't a big deal, I was saying your post was right and how he used my post to say it isn't a problem because it's rare is wrong let's look at the original post.
None of these things are alright
All the things are issues but now we have a bunch of people think death to the cops because of what 0.086% do.
My quote he took was an argument based around the first thing I quoted there, not that it's alright because it's such a small issue, in which I said wasn't correct people getting shot by police is an issue, and the police getting harassed is also an issue.
Edit: Also for some odd reason
has a +1 this whole time... it's almost like I was agreeing with you on that statement, and still do. I mean I can remove my +1 to show you how someone is obviously down voting you down to 0.
[–]friskybadger -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1UjKqzVDCw&feature=youtu.be
How can you justify an act such as this through numbers alone? This also went down as a "Justifiable Homicide". If THIS is justifiable, how many other cases that just say "Justifiable Homicide" on paper occurred like this or similarly to this?
You're a numbers guy, here's a site you should like
http://www.killedbypolice.net/
up-to-date spreadsheet with all murders, containing sources, starting in 2013.
[–]ItWasDumblydore 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
1100, was the number of people who got shot by a cop in 2014, which is the number I put up there.
Also that link doesn't tell you a few things.
That cop was responding to a call with a man with a gun in the area.
The cop quickly proceeded to administer first aid after shooting and realizing he had no weapon and called for an ambulance, while giving first aid he said "Stay with me, Stay with me buddy"
If a cop has his gun out it seems the worst thing to do is tell him "No, fool" and proceed to quickly pull your hands out of your pockets facing him. That cop had a one second choice to shoot, with the information of someone having a gun in the area.
Again stop trying to appeal to emotion and nature by saying whether it's right or wrong. That isn't the argument and do you agree with the fact that 99.92% of cops in USA who don't do these things should be killed and harassed over the 0.08%?
[–]friskybadger -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Did I say that any cops should be killed or harassed? No, I didn't. But something needs to change.
Also, if you watched the video, the cop doesn't administer first aid. He puts and gloves and starts going through the man's pockets. If you listen, the cop sounds audibly annoyed that this man is dying.
I'm honestly aghast that you defend these portly trained policemen so vehemently. Do you not agree that the killing of an innocent and unarmed individual by a peace officer is an abhorrent act? Do you not agree that it is a police officer's job to protect the people, instead of acting paranoid and suspicious around them?
It's easy to spout statistics and say "it's uncommon for this to happen" when a police murder hasn't affected you personally.
The fact is, the standards for becoming a police officer have been greatly lowered as America's population grows, and the "cops protect cops" mentality prevents those who screw up from being properly prosecuted. A cop with such a hair-trigger such as the one in the above video should never have been given a badge and gun in the first place.
[–]ItWasDumblydore 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Then you don't understand the argument of what I said, this isn't an argument of should it happen in which your trying to appeal to emotions and nature. We all agree it shouldn't happen cops shouldn't have to kill people. But I said that argument was about how often it happens, that it isn't a common thing happening every day the news makes it out to be and now cops are being harassed / killed / mocked.
Not all the cops who shoot at people are bad cops, they're people too and they want to live. So what are they going to think of the when someones not listening turn around and pulls his hands out of his shorts, when he matches the description of a guy wielding a gun in the area he was called in for?
There is many problems with being a cop.
Cops are constantly put into situations where they might have to make a life changing situation, and often can suffer from mental issues themselves. Cops have one of the highest suicide rates and kills more of them then felons do. (They have suicide rates close to doctors and dentists.)
Cops kill on average in the cases where they wrongfully do 42% are mentally ill. Possibly cops don't have access to training of what to do with mentally ill people and should get training on how to deal with common illnesses.
Cops protect cops isn't 100% true, cops will be taken to a court of law and be interviewed by his fellow workers. We see a few cases where they don't, but when on the news have you heard the names of people who got shot by the police? Once... Twice? A lot of the people where sued and a lot of them do go to prison. Usually for manslaughter instead of first degree murder. But I agree Cops should only have control of his job, the justice system will see if he commuted a crime.
I don't know if you guys are reading. I'm saying that this is a problem but not the problem it's overblown and have people mock and treat like shit because of something the 0.08% do. It would be like going through the mindset of a criminals listens to metal, ergo all people who listen to metal are criminals. I was putting what my argument was about when he copied and pasted it. As the person who used my comment said this.
So my response was
That comment was to someone finding alright to say kill cops because of what 0.089% do. So you agree we should slump 0.089% of the cops with the 99.911% of the cops who try to uphold the law. None of these things are alright, but people and the media are trying to make it seem like Cops are just this. All the things are issues but now we have a bunch of people think death to the cops because of what 0.086% do.
None of these things are alright, but people and the media are trying to make it seem like Cops are just this.
My argument was based off cops being harrassed/ mocked/ and even in rare situations killed over the 0.086%. Not that it's alright because it's rare, not that we shouldn't deal with it, but it is to think not every cop you walk by is going to want to shoot you.
TLDR:
Cops seem to have a high chance of suicide, and also developing mental health issues?
We now have cops (who might have developed a mental health issue), who don't understand mental health issues and how to deal with them because 42% of victims of being shot by a police is someone with mental health issues.
I was putting my stats into context and it wasn't to support that "How is it Toxic? It isn't very rare" wasn't the point of my quote but "how we're harassing the majority based off what 0.09% of cops do." was the context for my quote.
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=31772096 >Look at this video<
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
but but but don't you have all the cunts?
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
no one ever pms me cunts... :(
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There ya go. Don't say I never gave ya anything.
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
but thats not a PM!
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What was I thinking?
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[+]Ransom_Stoddard [recovered] (30 children) | Copy Link
"... but it's different when it's a woman ...", says most women.
[+]I-Cut-Myself [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
I get a twitch when someone says that
[–]Ctrl_Alt_Del_Esc 50 points51 points52 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]WisdomModifier 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jvardrake 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]farkface 45 points46 points47 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Army90 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Kdawg493 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]avantvernacular 78 points79 points80 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ransom_Stoddard42 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Erociter 23 points24 points25 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdvocateForTulkas 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thingamabobby 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Erociter 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kdawg493 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]benjimann91 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheMer0vingian 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghosttrainhobo 5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kdawg493 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Phoxxent 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jacob8015 8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]cl3ft 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]_RAPE_RAPE_RAPE 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]skabbo 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cl3ft -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kdawg493 -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PaintAndPlastic 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hork23 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Aidyyyy [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
Is there a video for this? I'd like to see it.
[–]ilikecigarettes 69 points70 points71 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]digglez 76 points77 points78 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dr_Merkwurdigliebe 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cheesemacher 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aidyyyy 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ILoveCheers 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]outcastded 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]euclagarcia -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PigEqualsBakon 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nikolaibr 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Aidyyyy 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 48 points49 points50 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hork23 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Raunien 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zyguy 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]greatestbass 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]greatestbass 11 points12 points13 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]Akasha20 -8 points-7 points-6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fallout 10 points11 points12 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Enzemo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Akasha20 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Fallout 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kingwaller99 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cynicalsimon 8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]killinblow 17 points18 points19 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]cynicalsimon 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]itsamealex 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheBuzwell 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Deimos_F 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoanneKerlot 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vanriel 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PerfectHair 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Cross_of_Coronado 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Headchopperz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tdeuce16 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]romulusnr 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PerfectHair 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pupunoob 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sizzletron 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]S-BRO 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shameless8914 -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MR_Movement -4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kurwasaki12 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MR_Movement -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Kurwasaki12 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Spurnout -20 points-19 points-18 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]IlleFacitFinem 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]IlleFacitFinem -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]IlleFacitFinem -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Spurnout 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KRosen333 -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Mekisteus 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dr_Merkwurdigliebe 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HaroldOfTheRocks 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]60for30 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hork23 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shameless8914 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]remotaholic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Raunien 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -73 points-72 points-71 points (64 children) | Copy Link
[–]garbledcluster 37 points38 points39 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 9 points10 points11 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CttCJim 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CttCJim 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]60for30 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Watermelon_Salesman 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger 3 points4 points5 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anathema_Redditus 7 points8 points9 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -5 points-4 points-3 points (37 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anathema_Redditus 4 points5 points6 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -2 points-1 points0 points (31 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anathema_Redditus 6 points7 points8 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anathema_Redditus 1 point2 points3 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT -3 points-2 points-1 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore 2 points3 points4 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]friskybadger -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ItWasDumblydore 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YER_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link