I always see women saying they want men to be "Traditional" when it comes to dating.
Saying how its a mans job to ask a woman out. If he ask then he pays. And stuff like that.

But..... Dating is not traditional. Dating in itself literally broke the traditions. Dating was looked at as prostitution. Women traditionally lived at home for longer. This helped keep her body count lower.
And if a man wanted to be with her, he had to be serious up front. Go back another step there were dowerys to be paid. Fast forward to today women are leaving the home, living on their own. But are expecting men to pay as if they are husbands. Paying for dates as almost a rental. There are women who expect men to pay her rent after a few weeks of meeting her.

Again, forcing men to be "traditional" while women demand to be progressive. And men who are progressive are either looked over ( broke and expecting 50/50. ) Or are shamed to be traditional ( where are all the good men ). The only men who are "allowed" to be Progressive are the top % of men. And by progressive I mean not act traditional and exercise "Options". Because those men have the power to do so.

Its 2024, society ( in the west ) cant be "traditional". and its very unfair to men to push that idea of being a "provider" on them when women are in the workforce. Imagine the workforce being 1000 gold coins.
Women not working allowed men to go out and work to bring that 1000 gold coins home to the women.
But now women are working. Now that 1000 gold coins is 400 gold coins available for men. Now All men have to work and fight over a smaller amount of coins to bring home to all the women. Women now have gold coins of their own but still expect the men to provide all the gold coins as if he even has access to 1000 still.
This at its very core is unsustainable. Instead of helping to bring home 1000 gold coins, the women have turned around and shrank the supply and overwork the men. And it's held against the men for not being "Traditional" when its women themselves that make it impossible.