TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Road side assistance is sexist. Her car broke down & AA said they can't prioritise lone women as 'it's equality'

RealStarkey

January 21, 2022
1203 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.the-sun.com/news/4506117/aa-women-risk-lone-female-motorists/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Road side assistance is sexist. Her car broke down & AA said they can't prioritise lone women as 'it's equality'
Author

RealStarkey

Upvotes 1203
Comments 125
Date January 21, 2022 1:36 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s9awfx/road_side_assistance_is_sexist_her_car_broke_down/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/road-side-assistance-is-sexist-her-car-broke-down.1098398
https://theredarchive.com/post/1098398
Top posts by RealStarkey

Woman who accused the three Duke lacrosse players of rape, now says she lied, made it all up.

1742 upvotes
December 13, 2024
/r/MensRights

To the scared, angry women who lurk here, can I just gently but firmly remind you that male empowerment does not mean female disenfranchisement ? It’s not a zero-sum game. We can both succeed.

1607 upvotes
February 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

Female teachers discriminate against boys when grading, give girls unfairly higher grades than boys.

1354 upvotes
September 2, 2024
/r/MensRights

Lesbians divorce at higher rates than heterosexual couples and more than six times more than gay men.

1308 upvotes
October 1, 2024
/r/MensRights

Netflix drama demonstrates that smartphones are poison for boys’ minds. Only boys minds.

1141 upvotes
March 24, 2025
/r/MensRights

A reminder that men in America are 93 % of work place fatalities, start 81% of businesses, receive less college education but still make up 73 % in STEM fields. If they become millionaires half get taken to the cleaners by a wife. Don’t let feminists tell you that we live under the patriarchy.

1028 upvotes
March 9, 2022
/r/MensRights

My dad was an 'idiot' and was never really there growing up. He just built a life for me where I can live in a real castle. Now I get to shame him publicly.

860 upvotes
January 11, 2025
/r/MensRights

Gen Z men with college degrees now have higher unemployment than women and the same unemployment rate as non-grads.

771 upvotes
July 28, 2025
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]63daddy 294 points295 points296 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Funny she twists this: AA is being non discriminatory and responding equally. She simply feels she should be given preferential treatment: a true Karen attitude. In expecting preferential treatment due to her sex, she’s the one being sexist.

Also, men are at greater risk of being murdered than women.

[–]kiaeej 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When preferential treatment is the norm, equality feels like discrimination.

[–]DodgeDemon2 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

AA ended up being discriminatory, as later in the article, AA’s PRESIDENT was quoted as saying, “We use common sense and prioritise women but by the letter of the law we can’t say that.”

[–]63daddy 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Prioritizing women isn’t common sense, it’s just discriminatory and gynocentric.

[–]Antanarau 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"common sense" means what most of the populace agrees on , and thus is being seen as true. In a way, gynocentrism IS common sense.
After all, is it not common sense that man cannot hit a woman and etc.?

[–]valspare 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

She simply feels she should be given preferential treatment: a true Karen attitude.

I completely disagree here. A Karen is a very specific type of entitled woman. Female feminists on the other hand, are all different sizes, colors, races, ethnicities, and now even different genders, that hail from all over modern societies that fight for "Equal Rights", which we all know is a smoke screen for special treatment because of "feelings" or some crap like that.

​

In expecting preferential treatment due to her sex, she’s the one being sexist.

I agree with you here. But I think the "entitled female feminist" if you will, just can't see that.

[–]63daddy 33 points34 points35 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She feels she deserves assistance above others. That entitlement attitude is very much a Karen attitude. Being a Karen and being a feminist are not exclusive. I find they often go together. Feminism is a very entitlement oriented movement.

[+]valspare -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

True, a Karen has an entitled attitude.

From what I understand the "Karen" is a white, mid aged, entitled woman.

In today's society, I'm sure the term "woman" now applies to Transgenders as well.

[–]ZS_1171 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

stereotypically, yes, but its not restricted to race.

[–]Input_output_error 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Female feminists on the other hand, are all different sizes, colors, races, ethnicities, and now even different genders, that hail from all over modern societies that fight for "Equal Rights", which we all know is a smoke screen for special treatment because of "feelings" or some crap like that.

Those colors are the thing that always seem a dead giveaway. Green hair, blue hair, grey (painted) hair, hair with glitters, purple hair the list goes on and on!

[–]valspare 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Those colors are the thing that always seem a dead giveaway. Green hair, blue hair, grey (painted) hair, hair with glitters, purple hair the list goes on and on!

Ahhhh, great point. I have to admit that this wasn't what I was thinking when I said colors.

[–]Input_output_error 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, well i thought that was covered by ethnicity :P But still, those hair colors are a very good indicator.

[–]n8ivco1 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aposematism.

[–]demonz_in_my_soul 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

STFU

[–]valspare 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

STFU

Glad you could articulate your point concisely. However, that's probably a bit to concise for anyone to understand your point.

[–]SporkTornado 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are the overwhelming majority of victims of stranger violence.

[–]ZS_1171 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i'm not one to say one has it worse than the other, but this is statistically and factually true.

[–]63daddy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. My point wasn’t to say how poor men have it. My point is simply that the claim women should be helped first because they are at greater risk, is an argument that simply isn’t true as shown by actual safety data.

[–]imAlreadyBanned8 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For modern feminists, equality isn't the goal.

In their mind they suffered all these centuries, so now it's their time to shine.

[–]Idiodyssey87 201 points202 points203 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"I got exactly what I said I wanted, and that pisses me off! -Women

[–]JustSomeGuy2008 50 points51 points52 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women: "Men are privileged!!!"

Women: get treated like men

Women: "This sucks"

[–]_wrong_ad_ 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Giving me exactly what I asked for is a tool of the patriarchy!

[–]Lasttoflinch 429 points430 points431 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Sophie Francis-Cansfield, of Women’s Aid, said: “One woman is murdered by a man every three days in the UK. Priority must be given to ensuring women’s safety.”

Blatantly ignoring the fact that men are almost 3 times more likely to be victims of homicide.

[–][deleted] 137 points138 points139 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That and at least one guy has been accused of sexual assault by a woman after he *gasp* dared to try to help her with a roadside emergency.

Craftsman toolsets exist.

Invest, ladies.

You're on your own.

[–]_wrong_ad_ 68 points69 points70 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I thought they needed men like fish need bicycles? Now I hear they actually DO need men to rescue them when their cars breakdown.

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Much as George Washington and Abraham Lincoln could not tell a lie. I cannot give a Fuck.

[–]VicisSubsisto 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, when the fish's car breaks down, it needs a bicycle to get around...

[–]RealStarkey[S] 183 points184 points185 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You are using logic. Shame on you.

[–]Lasttoflinch 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My bad

[–]OliveBoobs 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And think of the wives of all those men who get murdered. They’re the real victims.

[–]tieredbeard 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dont forget the mother and daughters

[–]iGhostEdd 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're killing their wives now too?! OMG, where?

[–]PM_ME_ASSPUSSY 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

bUt iT's mEn KiLLiNg tHeSe mEN!!!

[–]YourPillsAintWorkin 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're really saying that men deserve to be murdered by other men because all men are guilty. Never forget that feminists are collectivists who believe in collective guilt and collective virtue.

[–]neoalfa 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Not just that. Violence against women is largely at the hand of people they already know and often live with. Former or current lovers, as well as other family members.

Despite the general feeling of fear, a lone woman on the streets is several orders of magnitude safer than a man in the same position.

EDIT: For the sake of intellectual honesty I feel I should make a clarification. Women are less likely to be victims of violence outside of the home also because, due to their heightened feeling of fear, they are less likely to be out alone at night. Women's aversion ro risk is one of the many reasons they are a minority in many other categories both good (higher paying jobs/careers) and bad (homelessness, jail victims of violence).

Still the point remains that there is zero tangible data saying that women are more at risk than men. In fact, considering several social experiments that havebeen performed over the years, women in distress are far more likely to receive help than men.

[–]aigars2 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If it's a call and a man is in trouble we should first choose to save them I guess

[–]Lasttoflinch 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My stand is that there should be no default position with regards to gender, and each case should be evaluated as objectively as reasonably practicable.

[–]plsgivemepokemon 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You also have to remember that in most prisons/jails a majority of prisoners that are male treat women beaters/rapists as scum. Most criminals rarely touch women when it comes to random acts of violence. That’s why most victims of violence are usually men. Men are the disposable sex and I’ll never think otherwise. We must protect men/boys no matter what.

[–]SkippyMcHugsLots 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What happened in 03 to get a spine like that?

[–]My_Other_Name_Rocks 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

States underneath, it includes the 43 male victims and the 130 female victims of Dr Harold Shipman, he targeted the elderly and killed them via overdose I believe, they were all old so he managed to go fairly undetected for a long time.

I assume 2003 was when he was convicted so all the deaths attributed to natural causes got reclassified as murder.

[–]SkippyMcHugsLots 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So dismissing the statistical anomaly that can be accounted for, men are murdered at three times the rate women are, on average, per year in the UK.

[–]sizzler 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now do young black men in London.

[–]handybh89 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Genuinely asking don't flame me too hard as I am a fellow guy, but these male victims of homicides, what is the gender split for the perpetrators of these homicides?

[–]pdoherty972 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's mostly men. How is that relevant?

[–]dingoperson2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Genuine question don't freak out and have a psychological breakdown or try to come to my house or something but how do you think the question you ask is relevant?

[–]handybh89 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because I feel like it would be more useful to fix the root of the problem which is that men are the ones actually commiting the homicides against other men.

So if you care that men are usually the victims of homicide have the awareness to identify that men are also the problem.

It's like when men say "men are way more at risk for being raped in jail, this is a big problem and not something to joke about, like don't drop the soap.. etc". Uhhh who do you think are the ones doing the raping???

[–]dingoperson2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is your plan to stop homicides written down anywhere? How long do you estimate it will take until your plan causes homicides to be eliminated, or nearly eliminated?

Has anyone else tried following your plan to eliminate homicides? It seems surprising that something as horrifying as homicides could be ended with your plan, but somehow it has just never been carried out in any country in the world?

In the interim years, the years from now until the time you estimate your plan will have succeeded, why would equal or additional protection for the greatest victims of homicide be something we shouldn't do at the same time? You say you would rather do one than the other - why not both?

[–]mcmur 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The level of self-importance these women have is truly staggering.

[–]Pr0X_JoshiGuy 93 points94 points95 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

From now on equality is sexist apparently. Didn't see that one coming.

[–]HyperJCT 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because they don’t want to be treated equal, they want to be treated superior by throwing a fit until they get it.

[–]AirSailer 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Megan Rapinoe explained it perfectly when asked about the women's soccer team actually getting paid more than the men's team. "Equal pay isn't about getting paid the same, it's about equity." Women want to be treated the same as long as it benefits them, when it doesn't they want a boost (equity) of something to make sure the outcome is equal to the best a man can get. In this case equity means getting preferential treatment (extra than what a man would receive) due to the perceived unequal threat they face.

[–]sleepyJoeBidet 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where have you been the last decade ?

[–]Pr0X_JoshiGuy 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was a child then, i didn’t know better then

[–]gunpackingcrocheter 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s why they quietly changed the word from equality to equity in the last year or so.

[–]Daman_1985 72 points73 points74 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Equality only when it's an advantage. Classic story of the last decade.

[–]ralphswanson 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep. The honest feminist mantra is 'Equality when convenient, special privileges the rest of the time'. Oddly, traditionalist agree with them on that point.

[–]mouldysandals 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

girl smacks big guy repeatedly

guy finally snaps and lightly slaps her

whole crowd swarms guy calling him a sexist pig

[–]sakura_drop 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Classic story of the last century.

[–]aigars2 91 points92 points93 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Titanic all over again. Society deeply rooted in.. matriarchy? First save women because reasons..

[–]Bowlnk 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With childeren they mean girls btw.

On some sinking ships boys as young as 12 were left to die along side the men.

[–]Tre_Walker 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

cause gina

[–]Simple-Dimension3806 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are right. It should always be women first. . . . . . . . . . Women first on my cock lol.

[–]Kinexity 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They only remember facts about men being more often victims of violent crimes when they need to counter the argument by saying that it's perpetrated by men but immediately forget about it in case of getting a privilege.

[–]EmceeHammer1 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They're doing jobs correctly by prioritizing motorways. I broke down on a busy motorway and made the mistake of going to work and deciding to deal with it afterwards. In the meantime a drunk driver hit my truck so hard that it completely sheared the back axle off on the driver's side. The drunk driver then proceeded to flee the scene. Had I stayed and got it towed immediately I never would have had that happen. Motorways are sketchy af. but no ima girl so play favorites is just too common of a thing. My Equality < My Priorities

[–]gnuban 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So how do you know they were drunk?

[–]EmceeHammer1 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

so I started calling tow truck companies explaining my situation about how I'd been hit and run and where at. After about ten or so calls I found a towing company who said they had towed someone from there who'd been in a collision. They happily gave me his address. I showed up to his trailer with his passenger side mirror in hand that I'd found by my truck. When the police got there and questioned him he admitted to hitting me and to being drunk @ the time of the accident. When the police asked him what he was doing he said he was out looking for a prostitute. Real awesome fella! The police also told me a few hours earlier there was nothing they could do and nobody would ever find the guy. Great police work guys! 👏

edit sorry I keep leaving stuff out - I wanted to say that absolutely no charges were brought against the guy even though he admitted to all of it.

[–]_wrong_ad_ 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or you would’ve been in the car when it happened and be dead.

[–]EmceeHammer1 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

whiplashsure but not dead. The cab of the truck was completely untouched.

edit - I forgot to mention I saw the guy blocking traffic then pull over as I was walking back to my vehicle from the nearest exit. so it happened not long after I got done with my shift. That's how I knew I could have avoided the accident if I had it towed immediately.

[–]reikert45 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

”I am pretty sure that is not equality. I will now wait alone in the dark for 90 minutes or more, something which as a lone woman nowhere near home is far more anxiety-provoking than it would be for a man”

This sort of “group-think” really gets me every time. Who is she to discern what an entire group “feels”. Being a woman has nothing to do with proximate fear.

Commodity services are typically prioritized on a FIFO basis. It makes no sense to prioritize “lone women”. You’d have 50% of your callers being constantly and persistently deprioritized on no other basis than having an outie instead of an innie.

Give me a break!

[–]McFeely_Smackup 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“I asked the call handler why they treated men and women the same...

Feminism in a nutshell.

Equality when it suits them, damsel in distress when equality is a burden

[–]camkos101 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep it dissapear when times get hard

[–]Punder_man 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So what happens if the AA decide to charge women more for the privilege of being prioritized?
I'm fairly sure the feminists would shriek about how 'sexist' that would be.. but they would still expect to keep the privilege of being prioritized if their car breaks down.

It's disgusting..

[–]TRDPaul 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the actual fuck? I thought this story would be making fun if the woman for not understanding equality but it was just about people agreeing with her and the company apologising and saying it does prioritise women

[–]missinglynx61 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/homicideinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020
This link , 2020 stats showing the rate of murder for men is 17 per million of population and women at 6 per million. Men are murdered at three times the rate of women. And yet women should still get priority? WTF is wrong with this picture?

[–]TheFyree 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pretty sure women pay less for their insurance in the first place...you know, because they’re “better and safer drivers” 🥴

[–]HenryCGk 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Europe (I think this is Luxembourg so EU28) they can't use gender directly they have to use job title or other clues

[–]AngryTrucker 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists don't want equality, they want superiority.

[–]djc_tech 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you want equality or special treatment? Which one is it?

[–]IncitefulInsights 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Special treatment of course.

[–]MotherAce 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Sophie Francis-Cansfield, of Women’s Aid, said: “One woman is murdered by a man every three days in the UK. Priority must be given to ensuring women’s safety.”

Quickly doing an estimate on the math in my head, using statistics for England and Wales from 2019/20, there's almost 2 men murdered every day. Seems to me if you are gonna prioritise...

I just hate how feminism skews the numbers, and leaves out the fact that they are almost always the more sheltered and prioritised gender by default. Fuck those irrational actors.

[–]Punder_man 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why let a simple thing like FACTS get in the way of your narrative?
Or if the facts don't add up.. lie about the facts and do everything you can to push the true facts under the rug..

Feminism only cares about 'facts' when the facts back up what they are trying to preach.. if the facts go against what they are saying then its all because of 'dodgy research / studies' or the facts are just 'wrong'

As they say... if it weren't for double standards, feminism would have no standards.

[–]cosmiccelestialnova 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Any LONE person with no way of defense should be prioritized.

[–]DigitalisEdible 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They prioritise location, so someone stuck on the side of a motorway is prioritised ahead of someone whose car has broken down in an Asda car park. Which makes complete sense.

[+]cosmiccelestialnova -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That makes absolute sense! Unless someone feels they’re in actual danger there’s no reason for them to be prioritized. Now if the female in the story had said there were people harassing her or something then I could see why they’d be upset. Although If they said that specifically without any reason I’d also see why someone would be upset.

[–]Cortinagt1966 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If somebody is 'harassing you', get into the car, lock the doors and call the police. They would come and sort it out, the AA aren't your personal protection squad. She is more annoyed she had to wait 90 mins than about her safety, 90 mins is also not that long. She was also safe enough to be on twitter.

[+]cosmiccelestialnova -20 points-19 points-18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think you’re really comprehending what I’m saying so you can just run along bud.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All women are entitled and expect preferential treatment. Nothing to see here.

[–]MarBitt 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why is prioritising women a common sense, even if it is against the law?

AA president Edmund King said: “We use common sense and prioritise women but by the letter of the law we can’t say that.”

[–]MyFatThumb 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AA president Edmund King said: “We use common sense and prioritise women but by the letter of the law we can’t say that.”

In the article they openly admit they break the law in a national newspaper without fear of prosecution.

[–]Goats_vs_Aliens 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So in fact they DO prioritize women.

[–]aigars2 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who doesn't really? Even gay men?

[–]HyperJCT 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao, sexist because they won’t give women special treatment. That’s rich.

[–]thoh_motif 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She should call her fucking husband.

[–]WeakEmu8 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Brutal.jpg

[–]Bone-Juice 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dear Dr Mott, you wanted equality, now fucking live with it.

[–]GoneWithTheZen 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Joker meme: you get what you fucking deserve!

[–]Archangel1313 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol! Equality is sexist?

[–]gotagoodusername 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So misandry is equality now?

[–]needalife94 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I going to channel my inner bill burr here. "Feminist women say that they want equality but when you actually listen to what they say , they don't".

[–]sheridan658 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha these feminist really only want equality when it suits them.

Men are more likely to be murdered than women, statistically more likely to be killed sat in her car after a breakdown due to collision but rejected the advice to leave the vehicle.

Really really thick people, probably why they are radicals.

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pussy Pass: DENIED!

[–]luke-n-goode 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s always the ugly ones isn’t it? Away and take yer face for a shite!

[–]ChaosOpen 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The mum tweeted about it, provoking... an AA apology.

They completely deserve the ensuing hate mob that is coming their way far worse than anything that lady could have drummed up herself. An apology is not actually an apology to twitter, on twitter if you tell some random yahoo claiming you aren't SJWing correctly, it is essentially an admission of guilt. AA basically told the entire internet "it was my fault and any harassment is completely justified."

[–]pdoherty972 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sad thing is they changed their correct position 180 degrees after mostly women made comments about how they should give them preference.

[–]isthebuffetopenyet 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that's fair but of course the AA mechanic must also be a woman.

[–]stackshockprism 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being in a dangerous situation always makes it a priority if someone doesn't feel safe.

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the reverse of a pink tax. Women get better service for the same money. I'm sure they don't charge women more to get prioritized.

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she doesn’t like equality she should create a roadside service company that caters exclusively to women. As an added plus, the company should only hire female mechanics and tow truck drivers. The company symbol can be a fish riding a bicycle.

[–]Jimmy5772 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Good on the AA 👍🏻. Hope more companies follow suit. For once, equality means actual equality and not to benefit the latest “ fashionably oppressed group”.

[–]C20H25N3O-C21H30O2 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They went back on it, publicly apologized and are updating the rules in women's favour so she did reach her goals.

[–]Jimmy5772 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow. There is no hope.

[–]sneedchuckfuck 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely ridiculous

[–]sleepyJoeBidet -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Real lesson.

Dont pay for a shitty autoclub that doesnt contract with enough wreckers to keep up.

[–]gumpton 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They wrote a “news” article about literally one tweet. This is hardly the mens rights scoop of the century

[–]hottake_toothache 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Talk about entitlement!

[–]IllustriousPiano7300 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They want equal outcomes not equal inputs. That's not equality.

And that's only assuming women are indeed more at risk.

[–]cobracoral 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AA just said they prioritize by call time and location…

[–]worthrone11160606 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didnt AA say they looked at it and didn't do it becuase she was in a grocery store parking lot or did I not read that somewhere.

[–]LW_YT 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

based

[–]Disastrous_Pangolin3 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They think the preferential treatment part of sexism, isn't sexism but their basic right as women, the rest is misogyny.

[–]NicholasCapsicum 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did they really use male on female violence as an excuse as to why they need to be helped first? Wait till they see some male on male violence stats. We are at more of risk than them anyway.

[–]Simple-Dimension3806 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What these bitches can do is jump on my cock. They'll get all the special treatment they crave alright. Oh no wait I'm not gonna stick my dick in crazy. Gonna Dodge them from a mile away even if they try jumping on it. Keep your filthy pussies away from me noobs.

[–]CRCampbell11 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We all know this is ridiculous. How many times will it be shared on this sub? So far 3.

[–]elonsmusketer 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

its almost like it needs to be called out

[–]CRCampbell11 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just get tired of seeing the same shit over and over and over... Gah!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter