TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Rational Male
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Mass circumcision event.

TheConsoleGeek

May 2, 2022
1229 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.imgur.com/3oxazlf.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Mass circumcision event.
Author

TheConsoleGeek

Upvotes 1229
Comments 355
Date May 2, 2022 5:17 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ugi9zk/mass_circumcision_event/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/mass-circumcision-event.1115911
https://theredarchive.com/post/1115911
Top posts by TheConsoleGeek

Remember, it's ok to mock men on something they have zero control over but don't you dare say anything about women!

4126 upvotes
November 23, 2022
/r/MensRights

Haha, fail.

390 upvotes
July 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[โ€“]Superb-Locksmith-228 323 points324 points325 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Annual foreskin harvest.

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]Heterodynist 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the strongest arguments for the existence of Reddit as a medium Iโ€™ve ever seen. Where else do you get classic comments like this?!!

Epsteinโ€™s Own Moisturizing Skin Cream

[โ€“]IdentifiesAsAnOnion 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Periodic bamboo trimming.

[โ€“]Sinnaatraa 455 points456 points457 points 4 years ago (104 children) | Copy Link

This is fucking gross, how is this legal again??

[โ€“]Retromind 128 points129 points130 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Muh culture

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]xcheshirecatxx 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nah

If only Muslims did it, it would be illegal

[โ€“]Conscious_Hair_5472 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100%

[โ€“]YesYesYesVeryGood 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Christians also. They look like Asians who are Christians. I can easily imagine this being the Phillipines.

[โ€“]Mikeferdy 279 points280 points281 points 4 years ago (88 children) | Copy Link

Some dude in the desert over 2000 years ago says its cool and people still believed him

[โ€“]FeierInMeinHose 58 points59 points60 points 4 years ago (61 children) | Copy Link

Thatโ€™s how it first came about. It actually makes a little sense when youโ€™re bathing once a month, but cleanliness has been the same for both intact and circumcised penises for a while.

The reason itโ€™s so popular in modern times is because the king of cereal decided he would do anything to get little boys not to touch themselves, even mutilating their penises.

[โ€“]OctaviaPinfold 72 points73 points74 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

"Cleanliness" has nothing to do with this, the foreskin evolved as a protective layer much earlier than humans had any concept of being clean. That couldn't have happened if it was enabling infections left and right.

[+]matrixislife -20 points-19 points-18 points 4 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

Depends where you are living, getting a load of sand down between the foreskin and glans is never going to be pleasant.

[โ€“]Sininenn 50 points51 points52 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

As opposed to the pure extasy of sand rubbing against an exposed glans...

[โ€“]Temporary_Spend_3111 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I love that outlook of it๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“]Sininenn 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who doesn't love getting their dick sanded...

Especially when the protective foreskin is cut off, the sand can now enter the urethra way easier! Absolute bliss...

[+]matrixislife -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Oh neither is good, but having sand be unable to get out is considerably worse imo, especially if you're not able to clean it out properly later on. I think that might have been the reason for routine circumcision in the first place. Nowadays of course, no justification for it at all.

[โ€“]Sininenn 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You're acting as if underwear wasn't invented until 10 years ago...

The reason for circumcision was as a substitute for blood sacrifice of the firstborn male, and to cripple male sexuality.

It has absolutely nothing to do with sand in the foreskin. If that were true, nobody would be able to survive in sandy areas for more than a generation, yet we have thousand years old civilizations who do not genitally mutilate having done just fine.

[โ€“]Conscious_Hair_5472 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not correct in any way...

[+]matrixislife -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm aware of the Abraham tale, usually things are done for a good reason then gets converted into a spiritual one to support religious doctrine.

Afaik it wasn't done to affect male sexuality until Kellogs got in on the act, a few thousand years later.
I do love how definite you are, how certain that you are correct. And how willing you are to project something that might affect one or two men a year into a society-killing epidemic.

[โ€“]Sininenn 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I was not referencing any tale, but Eric Clopper's historical research on circumcision, which he presented in his play - sex and Circumcision, an American Love Story.

Wait, what exactly are you accusing me here of? Your argument was that getting sand into the foreskin is unpleasant, and leads to further problems, therefore, cultures living in sandy areas - which is where the two religions outright demanding, or practicing MGM come from, would cut the foreskin off to avoid sand accumulation - which you say is an issue.

My argument was that people have used underwear for ages to prevent debris entering their genital areas, and that sand will rub way more against an exposed glans in the first place, and that there were and still are other cultures, who live in arid areas that do not mutilate male genitalia - who seem to have been fine surviving for centuries without their genitals rotting away due to infections from sand buildup.

Something you, at first, claim would be a big issue requiring widespread societal amputation of the foreskin to prevent such issue, and then switch to arguing that the very same issue is not as prevalent.

Does that sound right at all to you? And I am not saying all this to judge you or anything. I have heard the argument you used before. However I have never actually critically though about it until now - and it made me realize how it just does not make any sense - and it is yet another one of those myths regarding circumcision that cycle around...

[–]matrixislife0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm saying that a problem that could affect a few men a year to the point where the society might say "let's find a way to deal with this" is not something where

nobody would be able to survive in sandy areas for more than a generation,

Going over the top and exaggerating a claim for the sake of winning an argument you aren't even having is a little weird. I'm not trying to argue against a ban on circumcision, I was considering the way it came to be widespread in the first place.

[–]Sininenn2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Something which would affect a few men a year would not result in society saying 'let's start cutting all men's foreskins'

It is not exaggerating to claim that a society in which the entire male population has to get cut or have infected genitals impossible to reproduce with would not survive without said cutting.

Remember, it was you who claimed that it was plausibly necessary because of sand - which, as I already explained makes no sense.

[–]matrixislife1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Then what would?

[–]Sininenn2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I already told you what the reasons were, which you completely ignored. I also named the source of my information more than once.

[–]matrixislife2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Substitute blood sacrifice. Really? I think sand makes much more sense than that.

[–]Sininenn2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Okay, then. If you want to play it that way - I have taken your uninformed opinion into consideration, and weighted it against a Harvard Student's well-reaearched lecture, as well as common sense and logic, and my decision is that your opinion is not true.

[–]Conscious_Hair_54720 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your decision on his opinion is a reflection of your stupidity, you are entitled to have an opinion and so is he, "my decision is you are wrong" is not an argument...

[–]Sininenn0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Right, trusting a well researched argument over one dude's inconsistent and illogical argument is 'my stupidity'.

Please, keep your opinion to yourself next time.

[–]Conscious_Hair_54720 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I said that deciding that someone is wrong because you disagree with them is your stupidity, i wont keep my opinion to myself because people like you don't keep their opinions to themselves.

[โ€“]CedarWolf 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

I have to ask: do you actually have foreskin, or are you just making assumptions? Because you seem to have no idea how a foreskin actually works.

I can run around all day with a bit of toilet tissue in my foreskin by accident and never notice it, and cleaning it out is laughably easy. Furthermore, I used to live on the coast and have been to the beach or played in the sand hundreds of times, yet never once have I accidentally gotten sand in my foreskin. The only time I've ever really gotten anything besides toilet tissue caught in my foreskin is because I intentionally put it there, and most things will just rub into a little ball or oval which you can remove later.

It's not like people are shoving bits of glass in there.


Edit: I should note here that the foreskin naturally lubricates itself, and if something does happen to get caught in it, the thing just rubs into a little ball and falls right out. It's not like the foreskin is hungrily eating up all the dust and pocket lint it can find, it works to protect the glans by keeping it shielded.

All these people who freak out about 'but what if something gets caught under there?' have clearly never had a foreskin or read about how they function.

[+]matrixislife -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

It's terrible when you make assumptions about other people, you can be so so wrong. Answers are yes, no, and it's actually part of my job.

You're showing a lack of understanding there, at the beach you're in and out of water a lot. In the middle of a desert in a sandstorm pre BC you couldn't stop to get something out of your underwear, assuming you had any, so it's quite likely to stay there for a few hours or even days. More than enough time to start off an infection, back in the time when there were no antibiotics available.

It's funny you say

It's not like people are shoving bits of glass in there.

when we are talking about sand.

[โ€“]michaelbleu 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Its terrible the way youโ€™re talking to people

[โ€“]matrixislife -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In between getting called an idiot and being downvoted for a reasonable pov, it can get irritating. I haven't resorted to name calling, yet I'm the one who gets told off for the way I'm talking to people?

[โ€“]michaelbleu -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Youโ€™re passing off your experience as the only way and ignoring concensus, just because you experience things a certain way doesnโ€™t mean you can throw all opposing points of view out the window, very arrogant

[–]matrixislife1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'll happily ignore concensus opinions when they are flat wrong. The opinion the earth was flat, or the moon was made of cheese, or the sun revolves around the earth are examples of incorrect concensus opinions. This is by no means as significant as those, but then again I'm not an astronomer, I'm a nurse, so this falls into my area of work.

Btw, do you know what the main composition of sand is?

[โ€“]CedarWolf 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It's terrible when you make assumptions about other people, you can be so so wrong.

Which is how I feel about your comments when you lie about foreskins and sand and other detritus.

it's quite likely to stay there for a few hours or even days.

Lol, what? Dude, cleaning out your foreskin is not difficult. The foreskin naturally lubricates itself and anything inside it will roll around until it falls out. That's how foreskins work. Did you break yours somehow?

Even when I've been deployed somewhere or I've been away camping or I've been somewhere I don't have ready access to a shower, the foreskin generally takes care of itself. And when it doesn't, you just slide it back, wipe it off, and you're fine.

Hell, in a pinch, you can pinch the tip closed, pee into it like a little balloon, and then release it, letting your own urine wash it out. Literally everyone with a foreskin figures this stuff out in grade school. A foreskin is so easy to maintain, you can forget about it for years at a time.

For example, the last time I ever intentionally put anything in my foreskin was over two decades ago, when I put a little cinnamon in it to see how it felt. It started as a pleasant tingling and became unpleasant very quickly, so I went and rinsed off with water and I was fine. No itching, no burning, no bullshit.

[โ€“]matrixislife -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In the middle of a desert in a sandstorm pre BC

Sorry, but if you cba to read what's written and just reply to what you think is there, then there's no point trying to talk to you.

[โ€“]CedarWolf 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're showing a lack of understanding of basic biology, which is why I suspect you don't have a foreskin and are just making shit up.

[–]matrixislife0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes, I have a foreskin, yes I have had a previous operation on it due to an infection, and yes, I've been a registered nurse for over 30 years dealing with a hell of a lot of foreskin problems over that time.

That's what I meant about you making assumptions.

[–]CedarWolf0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Then how do you not understand how a foreskin functions?

[–]matrixislife0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Why do you assume I don't? Actually, never mind. You can continue on with your baseless assumptions, you aren't hearing what I'm trying to say so off you go.

[โ€“]Imightbenormal6 points 4 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

I have never had sand between my head and foreskin.

Idiot.

[โ€“]matrixislife -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You're lucky then, it isn't pleasant. Almost as bad as grit under the eyelid.

[โ€“]Sininenn 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That's why our eyes have eyelids, to prevent grit entering into the eye, as well as tear ducts, which flush out small debris.

Similarly, the foreskin prevents small debris from entering and rubbing against the glans, and produces mucus which also flushes out dead skin cells, bacteria, dust and small debris.

The body evolved both for a reason...

[โ€“]matrixislife -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's not very good at it's job then, especially considering the variety of lengths it comes in.
Doesn't matter though, the point is that it can still trap irritants, which could have been part of the reason for the invention of circumcision in the first place considering that environment.

If you don't agree that's fine. But feel free to explain why a society would come up with the idea to chop off an incredibly sensitive part of their body otherwise.

[โ€“]Sininenn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Eyelids can, amd often do trap irritants, yet we don't cut those off.

Please watch the show I mentioned, before you make any other remarks which are factually incorrect. Once you do so, you will have all the answers to your question - which I already said in one of my first replies to your comments.

[–]matrixislife1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Ok, question for you. Where have I ever argued that we should circumcise anyone? Very simple question.

[–]Sininenn1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You are arguing that it is justified to do so, when it isn't.

You're reading things I am not saying.

[–]matrixislife1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Since when? I'm attempting to discuss where the idea came from originally, but I've certainly never tried to justify it in modern times.

[–]Sininenn2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Since your continuous efforts to justify the procedure. Even moreso, you're trying to discuss something without bothering to inform yourself on the subject, despite me providing you both the information and its source, which you continue to ignore, while all your arguments come from hearsay.

A propos point 2: Since you're asking me when you said we should circumcise anyone - as if I ever, ever claimed you did so...

[–]matrixislife1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Bullshit. You obviously started commenting on this thread without reading the post itself or realising the perspective I was talking from. I've been talking this whole time about where the practise originated from, the possible reasons it might have come into existence. That you seem to think I'm trying to justify it nowadays just speaks to your failure to read in the first place.

[–]Sininenn2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I started commenting in response to your comments being factually incorrect, by correcting them.

I definitely considered your perspective, as you can read in my lengthy comment entertaining it to the point of showing how it makes zero sense. If I didn't consider it at all, I would not be bringing up relevant arguments against it...

"I've been talking this whole time about where the practise originated from, the possible reasons it might have come into existence."

Yet despite me telling you you are wrong, and showing you proof why you are, you continued to defend and justify your position, hence, defending the argument you made, which, in turn, supports the procedure.

[+]FeierInMeinHose -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The appendix hasn't been bred out of us despite it causing infections and death. The human body isn't perfect.

[โ€“]OctaviaPinfold 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The appendix used to have a purpose but even today it doesn't cause more harm than anything else in the human body when it misbehaves. The foreskin on the other hand still has its main purpose: to protect the most sensitive body part, and it never causes infections. Really, the only way for the foreskin to contribute to an infection is if you put your dick into things it's not supposed to be in. The human body is very adept at cleaning itself from its own secretions and those are the only internal factor people with a foreskin are more exposed to.

[โ€“]Sininenn 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The appendix still has a purpose - even if we're scientifically unaware of it.

Some hypothesise that it is a sort of breeding ground, a safe space, if you will, for gut bacteria.

[โ€“]intactisnormal 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dr. Guest discusses through examples of the ape family how the trend of heavily innervated foreskin is a sign of evolutionary advancement from the lower primate species. It contributes to pair bonding, evolutionarily important for the male to stay and care for offspring.

[โ€“]xcheshirecatxx 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At that moment circumcision was only cutting what was longer than the glans.

So not changing hygiene

[โ€“]Heterodynist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ew, I wouldnโ€™t want to bathe more than once a monthโ€ฆcanโ€™t you just mutilate my penis instead?

(-Said no young man everโ€ฆ)

[โ€“]uno_reversoo -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

the reason in my religion (judaism) is because both males and females arent supposed to have a wank. (Sin of onan which is mentioned later in the torah but is explained to be the reason of male circumcision as it shows a male's willingness to accept G*D's first abrahamic covenant with them as a jew.)

[โ€“]Accomplished_Eye_463 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision never stopped me from touching myself.

[+]sammexp -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes it does because you need lubes, you donโ€™t need it with a foreskin

[โ€“]Busy-Argument3680 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ever heard of dry rubbing?

[โ€“]sammexp 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All the people downvote me, but I know because I was masturbating myself with another guy and we were talking about that. Yโ€™all just have a harder time to come.

I am a guy friend that tried also with a circumcised guy and we agree

[โ€“]Busy-Argument3680 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would post this to r/iHaveSex, but youโ€™re talking about masturbation

[โ€“]Sininenn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I once read an analysis of that tale, and its author explained that the reason was not that he masturbated, but that he did not impregnate his brother's widow.

Turns out, what he actually did was pull out, in order not to impregnate her.

"When Onan had sex with Tamar, he withdrew before he ejaculated and 'spilled his seed on the ground' "

"Onan's death was retribution for being "evil in the sight of the Lord" and disobeying a direct order from the Lord by being unwilling to father a child by his widowed sister-in-law."

Quick google sauce: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan

[โ€“]uno_reversoo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ah ok gotcha its just on Rabbi Sack's commentary he notes that masturbation is a repeated offence in the Torah (Onan from memory MAY have done it?) And G*D says it goes against the original covenant which is i believe the BASIS to the argument. I could however be wrong.

[โ€“]Heterodynist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think if I was to be circumcised with a sharp stone, the way they did in ancient Jewish times, I would be MORE likely to rub my penis, rather than less likelyโ€ฆif only to try to feel something through the unevenly healed scar tissue.

I know Iโ€™m exaggerating a bit, and Iโ€™m actually a non-Jewish fan of Judaism as a religion. I see many of its finer points. My only complaint is that the traditional rules of Judaism sort of went through a period of being debated and formalized and then set down in โ€œthe book,โ€ but why is that not a process that can ever be repeated? Why canโ€™t rabbis of many international synagogues come together and have a conference, just as they did in so-called Biblical Times, to create new rules?

Iโ€™m not suggesting they would vote to do this, but it seems many people I know who are current dedicated members of the Jewish faith, are nonetheless not Orthodox. I think the feeling of many of them is that the ancient rules of Judaism were established at a time when much of their contemporary life wasnโ€™t as it is today. Judaism can be a very practical religion, from my understanding, and it seems like Jews might consider having a set of modernized rules. Given that the rules were made at the time with the thought of being practical, rather than religiously correct.

[โ€“]Jethr0Paladin -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where does it say that in the old testament?

[โ€“]Sininenn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't, read my reply to OP's comment

[โ€“]deljogamer1200 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Nah jesus didn't say that or ill be circumcised it was the guy who started Judaism

[โ€“]hifi3xx 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So some guy 4000 years ago

[โ€“]deljogamer1200 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ye probably might even be a lil bit longer

[โ€“]wonderfulcupofbleach -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wtf...

[โ€“]deljogamer1200 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

??

[โ€“]hifi3xx 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah after that Jesus guy came God said you didn't have to trim the eyelid of the one eyed monster anymore

[+]vodoko1 -58 points-57 points-56 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Think 10-15 thousand years ago, or about 1000 years after Noah was born.

[โ€“]dependency_injector 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's still over 2000 years ago

[โ€“]plainwalk 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Almost right.It was Abraham, not Jesus like the other guy claimed. Both Noah and Abraham are entirely fictional, and were supposed to be about 4000-5000 BCE, I think.

[+]Kinexity -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Abraham is plausible and would live around 1700BCE. IIRC oldest parts of the Bible are dated at 1300BCE so 400 years of spoken propagation is not impossible. The Flood story is assumed false with closest similar event would be the flooding of Black Sea through Bosporus strait but it's a stretch by far.

[โ€“]LinkCandid6104 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Literally no one cares whatโ€™s real or fake from the Bible no matter what tf that book says this is not ok

[โ€“]xsplizzle 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i think we can safely assume that everything in the old testament and the majority of the new are all just fictional stories

[โ€“]Kinexity -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Who said it's okay? Also there is a lot of people interested in what in the Bible is true and what isn't.

[โ€“]LinkCandid6104 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Blah blah blah Bible Bible Bible are u done yet ??? The post is about male genital mutilation /mass circumcision not the dam book of fair tales called

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘„๐Ÿ‘tHe bIBle

[โ€“]Kinexity -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you don't car about the Bible then why did you bother to answer my comment? I just corrected someone because I saw something which by my knowledge is incorrect. Go engage in threads you're interested in and stop bothering people in threads you're not interested in.

[โ€“]LinkCandid6104 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Blah blah blah again are u done ??

[โ€“]SerialSection 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Far Far more areas in the world got flooded after the most recent ice age ended. Significant past areas which were once inhabited are now under water.

[โ€“]Kinexity -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's true but not many of them are in the Middle East and even less were significant enough to survive as stories to the moment when they could have been written down.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IIRC the flood matches the description of the tsunamis that washed over Greece after a large scale volcanic explosion that was more violent than Pompeii.

[+]ProPlayer1558 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/destroyerdaddy

[+]Ambitious-Producer -50 points-49 points-48 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I mean if the Quran hasnโ€™t been changed and there is evidence that the Quran wasnโ€™t changed, then why shouldnโ€™t Muslims believe?

[โ€“]Mikeferdy 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For one thing, baby pee pee cutting is not in the Quran in the first place. Its in a hadith.

[โ€“]KYZ123 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So what if the Quran hasn't been changed? Being unchanged doesn't turn a work of fiction into a work of fact.

But as another commenter has mentioned, "circumcision" isn't in the Quran anyway.

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean if the Quran hasnโ€™t been changed and there is evidence that the Quran wasnโ€™t changed

Bhaahahahahaha ! Tell me you are joking. You are blatantly wrong and invalid

[+]Ambitious-Producer -33 points-32 points-31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How am I wrong? There evidence and the Quran is put in order.

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How am I wrong? There evidence

There really is not evidence! Literally the opposite ! There is counter evidence !

All the caliphates proactively revisioned and edited the quran !

[โ€“]DaftDolphin 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because, no-one cares about men's issues. It is a sad world.

[โ€“]Business_Music2221 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's more disgusting when it happens to you . And see it happen in front of your eyes

[+]AkatsukiGaara -41 points-40 points-39 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Its circumcison bruh. Should be done by doctors tho. They say theres health benefits to it. Religious obligations too in islam, judaism and christianity. Is what it is. Id rather be circusized as a child and not know or remember the pain then to have to go thru it as a teen or adult lmao. Im cirvumsized myself. I dont really care.

[โ€“]16car 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not Christianity at all.

[โ€“]k0bra3eak 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They say theres health benefits to it

A thousand years ago yes, in present day no unless there are other medical complications which can be dealt with when they arise.

[โ€“]Sininenn 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you certain that performing open surgery had health benefits with an, at best, if at all, a rustically sharpened stone or metal knife put on fire, in an environment likely devoid of the knowledge of sanitation and antibiotics, to prevent or properly treat infections occuring as a result the surery, both out and inside the body?

[โ€“]16car 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You replied to the wrong person.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Catholic Church abolished the practice, itโ€™s optional

[โ€“]Neat_Zookeepergame99 458 points459 points460 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Mass male genital mutilation event.

FTFY

[โ€“]Shadowdragon409 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I posted this exact comment on the two subreddits it was posted to before this lol

[โ€“]Neat_Zookeepergame99 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Something something great minds something something

[โ€“]BrickDaddyShark 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You typed 4 words to omit twoโ€ฆ

[โ€“]Final_Collection_515 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

FTFY?

[โ€“]Neat_Zookeepergame99 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fixed that for you

[โ€“]Final_Collection_515 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh thanks lol

[โ€“]TAPriceCTR 131 points132 points133 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

๐Ÿคฎ

[โ€“]Superb_Drummer_9839 112 points113 points114 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the SICKEST THING is, they have GODDAMN RECORDS FOR THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN A MASS CIRCUMCISION (WHICH THEY TRY TO BEAT) 'CEREMONY'

[โ€“]JoinTheAstleyCult 239 points240 points241 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Fucking. what. These kids must be at max 10. They're going to feel very real pain. What the fucking fuck. someone really needs to do something about this, this is on the FUCKING INTERNET AND NO ONE GIVES A DAMN. THEY'RE MUTILATING THEM.

god i hate this fucking world so much

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]Bascome 76 points77 points78 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Put girl faces on the boys, repost, and watch it be the lead story on CNN tomorrow.

[โ€“]Sininenn 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hm, deep faking it as am awareness campaign could be extremely successful

[โ€“]disayle32 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"BUT BUT BUT HURR DURR FGM IS WORSE CHECKM8 INCELS" --Probably

[โ€“]milkmanRymor 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, it hurts real hard and my meat never been the same again.i consider foreskin restoration but im not sure will it work :(

[โ€“]QZip 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It used to be believed that babies, not having memories of that age, wouldn't be affected by pain coming from events of that age. They are. It has noticeable detrimental effects and isn't necessary unless a man has phimosis which the vast majority of men do not have.

[+]critical-thoughts -94 points-93 points-92 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

your hate is your path to the darkside

[โ€“]Echo_XB3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

-Makes a joke about star wars

-Gets downvoted to hell

[โ€“]gmanex 59 points60 points61 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This what they call priorities?

[โ€“]DivyanshPanwari 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bring in the feminist media. They care about gender equality amirite.

[โ€“]Sudden_Difference500 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting

[โ€“]patxiku93 56 points57 points58 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The dude in the bottom seems to consent a lot, he can't hide his enthusiasm /s

[โ€“]riodeorospainball 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I bet the children didnt even accept in mutilating their own bodies

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their slave master / serf lord-baron 'parents' (!) or breeders ~ essentially force them to do anything, from working to death to their annual scarification and trauma events

[โ€“]Intergalacticio 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

๐Ÿคข

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

*Mass Male Genital Mutilation | and scarification ' ritual ' event, and it is horrid, even repulsive.

​

Which country is this ?

[โ€“]Drakin5 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to the Philippines. We have dictators, North Korean embassies Iglesia ni Christo churches, thieves in the government, power hungry celebrities, tyranny of majority, and gaslighting everywhere. May 9th is when the Filipino sheeple gets to vote on their new slave master president for the next 6 years. Enjoy your stay.

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

​

Wait; its actually philliphines ?! :o

That explains quite a lot. Although I didn't know mass male genital scarification and mutilation rituals are held high there.

[โ€“]Enigmatic-Euphoria 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What. The. Fuck.

Imagine if this was a table stacked with young girls.

[โ€“]vwatchrepair 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We all know the issues with the actual circumcision. Burz just imagine the reactions a row of girls laying there like that without the genital mutilation. ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“]mykoiy 72 points73 points74 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Pls take this post down blur the faces of the children and re-upload

[โ€“]The_Adm0n 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. Humanity has a face, and we all need to see it.

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]ImAddictedToOranges 59 points60 points61 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

When I remember your mother gave birth to you i think

"Omg why ๐Ÿ™„"

[โ€“]Jezz_ah_bells 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pls-

[โ€“]Harbinger0fdeathIVXX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hahahHHHhahahahHhaHh

[โ€“]Final_Collection_515 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is disturbing

[โ€“]DaftDolphin 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is deeply disturbing. A childs health and safety should come before any religion/practice/tradition. They should be able to reach an age where they can consent without pressure from parents or anything else.

[โ€“]antgamingx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And what's the matter with their penises being circumcised or not?? I don't want my kid to be circumcised, also the old people look not very good at their job

[โ€“]DaftDolphin 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As long as they are old enough to consent without being pressured.

[โ€“]TheDwiin 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I have no problem with circumcision.

I have problems with the routine and systemic circumcision of minors before they can consent to the procedure as adults.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I donโ€™t like removing such a vital piece of skin but it should always be optional, not required, not impossible, and only by a consenting adult or if the child has health problems because of it.

[โ€“]Jethr0Paladin -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If it was a vital piece of skin, it wouldn't be removed.

It's clearly not vital. Try again, antisemitic.

[โ€“]CptSandbag73 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

antisemitic

What a ridiculous assumption and accusation.

http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Jewish_Circumcision

Do some reading. The original Hebrew practice of circumcision, โ€œMilah,โ€ was decidedly NOT the same as it is today in the West. It used to be just the removal of the tip of the foreskin, leaving plenty of protection for the glans while preventing the rare symptom of phimosis (an inability to retract the foreskin from around the glans.)

The current practice, โ€œPeri'ah,โ€ from which the Western medical practice was modeled, was instituted much more recently (1800 years ago, ish) as a vindictive practice to prevent Jewish men from being able to look like their Gentile peers in public baths and sporting settings by restoring their foreskins.

vital

Also, the foreskin is vital to preserve the sensitivity of the glans. The original Torah practice still retained enough skin to protect the glans, but when a man is missing the entire foreskin, fully exposing the glans, the glans keratinizes over time, which negatively affects sensitivity and pleasure during sex. So not literally vital for life, but itโ€™s pretty darn nice to have if you want your penis to work the way it was designed.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever had teeth pulled?

[โ€“]Jethr0Paladin -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Apples to potatoes. Not a remotely fruitful comparison.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was using a more common example and I know it is different, however some places encourage female genital mutulation, which is extremely similar.

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By your standard, any anatomy cut from a girl's genitals wasn't vital?

[โ€“]sparetosser2018 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100% this. If an adult wants to get it done, or it's deemed medically necessary, then fine, but it should not be done to a minor, and should not be done without that person's permission.

[โ€“]ApplezMan2 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What on earth...

[โ€“]ShubNiggurath20 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Child abuse is being celebrated like a festival ๐Ÿคฎ.

[โ€“]KickedSharf798 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

What even is this?

[โ€“]KickedSharf798 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Ok nvm i googled

WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? EVEN TO CHILDREN WHO CAN'T MAKE A DECISION ABOUT IT???

[โ€“]milkmanRymor 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

because of parentsโ€™ fucking religion.and no thatโ€™s happening more than you think.my country has over 80 million people and 90% percent of them mutiluated, including me :/

[โ€“]ItsVinn 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also the added stigma that in the Philippines if youโ€™re not circumcised, you will be teased by your peers and think youโ€™re not man enough.

[โ€“]KickedSharf798 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it should be the childs decision to follow the religion or not, and to do this decision alone at 18 But idk

[โ€“]milkmanRymor 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yeah that would be so รถuch better

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Itโ€™s even more insane as the Catholic church has abolished it as a practice, being only optional.

[โ€“]darwinevo 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's downright barbaric. Gross violation of human rights

[โ€“]Man_of_culture_112 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Must be the Filipino male privilege.

[โ€“]LocalNative141 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision is the most pointless fucking thing ever! It serves ZERO purpose. Aside from rEliGIoUs ReAsOnS, I struggle to understand why its still done

[โ€“]CaleThomason 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

An outright evil system; repugnant barbarians mimicking the blood ritual of a sociopathic cult.

May the day come when the victims hold their tools, be it gavel or weapon, over the fates of their persecutors.

[โ€“]Slow-Brush 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy fuck ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ

[โ€“]Fern-ando 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only good thing about catholic countries is that they are against this, well with the big exception of Filipinas.

[โ€“]helliot98 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking insane

[โ€“]Thevoidawaits_u 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No anesthesia, out in the open and no medical justification, this will not have passed medical ethical board.

[โ€“]omegaphallic 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is sick and morally repugnant,akin to raping little boys, I want to puke.

[โ€“]wifiragist 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lemme guess, the Philippines?

[โ€“]zogins 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting, cruel and macabre

[โ€“]A_GIANT_PAIN_AGP 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking disgusting

[โ€“]Vegetable-Ad-8224 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i love it how no one gives a fuck about boys getting circumsised but when a girl happens to get circumsised the whole country and regime is gonna pay for that. yes thats equal rights brother, they cut my foreskin and no one cared to stop it. im a victim too

[โ€“]McFeely_Smackup 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If there were a single "mass labioplasty" event for young girls, the entire world would hear about it and lose their collective minds.

[โ€“]mrs-weeniehutjr 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel kind this is a good way for the boys to get a infection or something. Ugh absolutely terrible.

[โ€“]TomsRedditAccount1 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mass genital mutilation event.

FTFY.

[โ€“]Working-Zucchini1205 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

High eunuchs

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hence they cannot off with the whole P anymore ~ hence illegal [except india and nepal] ~ these monsters and brutes adapted to enact this

[โ€“]jmcsquared 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck. How the fuck. Why the fuck.

Everything the fuck.

[โ€“]GodBirb 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I fucking hate this image. Thanks for sharing it though.

[โ€“]Britavit 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would be outcry and commercials raising awareness of this if it was girls, boys, nahhh nothing.

[โ€“]JimE902 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Personally I donโ€™t mind that it happened to me but I can imagine others caring

[โ€“]HappyAtheist3 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just leave the penis as it is. Teach your kids how to clean themselves.

[โ€“]rainbow_bro_bot 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Philippines.

The same country where the police are ordered by the president Duterte (who himself apparently likes Fentanyl) to shoot suspected users of recreational drug users dead (without trial). What a messed-up country.

[โ€“]flowercatt 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck

[โ€“]Amnsia 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Vile. Canโ€™t imagine doing this to your kid.

[โ€“]Kryptic_Tron 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People get so pissed when they get their clitoris mutilated, bruh society just makes sense

[โ€“]Great-Flan-5896 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is fucking evil on so many levels these people don't deserve to live.

[โ€“]Tall6ft7Guy4you 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

what the fuck

[โ€“]AspirationsOfFreedom 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For some reason, someone decided that they wanted to see a fokkin line of underage penises being mutulated...

Time to buy that cabin deep in the yukon and never see people again.

[โ€“]Mavgrim 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aberrant!

[โ€“]lordoftheblazeing 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf

[โ€“]SnooMarzipans5669 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Philippines. Fuctd.

[โ€“]Aguywholikespiggy 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is disgusting.

[โ€“]princesssbrooklynn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why tf Is this a thing itโ€™s disgusting

[โ€“]Jezz_ah_bells 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fucking hell?

[โ€“]yeetmemer4life 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why didn't you mark it NSFW you coward

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally the opposite of cowardly but yes it definitely should have been marked from the beginning.

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]iainmf[M] 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've marked it.

[โ€“]LinkCandid6104 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

๐Ÿ˜ง๐Ÿ˜งโ˜น๏ธthis makes me sick

[โ€“]Hefffallump 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Creator gave males a foreskin for a reason, not for adults to cutoff for money. ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฟ

[โ€“]sammexp 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Circumcision is the same as Clitoris ablation. It does reduce pleasure and increase pain during sex

That should be banned

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The more homologous practice is cliltoral hood ablation.

[โ€“]TL_TRIBUNAL 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

I was circumsized at 11 i am not aware it was bad. can some fellow bros explain why it is bad

[โ€“]plainwalk 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

It serves no purpose, damages the functioning of the penis, can cause major issues (like any surgery can) including death by infection and/or blood loss, is non-consenual and irreversable.

[โ€“]jadedyoungster 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

This isnโ€™t true, I had to have a circumcision due to repeat urinary tract issues, and my for skin was too tightly wound and I would suffer from inflammation as a child.

Source: https://www.gulfcoast-urology.com/blog/what-to-know-if-youre-considering-adult-circumcision

That being said, just mutilating kids without consent and for the sake of tradition is beyond egregious.

[โ€“]Sininenn 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Except that tight foreskin can be stretched, and infections cured with antibiotics and proper hygiene...

[+]jadedyoungster -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Who the fuck are you to judge what several Drs and surgeons came to a conclusion on.

Are you a DR? Did you go to medical school for 10 plus years? Are you a professional on anything besides sitting on Reddit for 8 hrs?

Fuck off moron.

u/Great-Flan-5896 you can block me all you want, youโ€™re still a dumb ass which is why you blocked me in the first place.

Criticism on NOTHING THEY KNOW ABOUT. Lol I swear yโ€™all think people wanna hear your stupid ass opinions because you have the right to.

Learn some nuance and read the room.

NOBODY CARES.

[โ€“]LettuceBeGrateful 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not saying the doctors were wrong in your case, but there are cases in America where doctors prescribe circumcision too soon, or even try to forcibly retract the foreskin and cause the damage that leads to inflammation and UTIs.

Again, not saying that happened in your case specifically, but given that we hear about those cases a fair bit, that might be where the commenters are coming from when they disagree with you.

[โ€“]Great-Flan-5896 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The person you are responding to thinks certain people are above criticism he is mistaken.

[โ€“]Great-Flan-5896 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are people and subject to criticism just like everybody else get over it.

[โ€“][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. Im usually onboard with this sub, but there are people entirely denying the proven health benefits (less infections and taking less antibiotics) from an emotional, fact-less base.

[โ€“]shofofosho 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The studies behind those claims have literally been debunked, that's why they are refuting it. Besides, the incorrect health benefits claimed are not substantial enough to warrant mutilating babies, the percentage changes are miniscule. giving all girls double mascectomies would help prevent breast cancer, but we don't do that now do we?

[โ€“]Great-Flan-5896 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People are people not all knowing creatures doctors can be wrong just like any body else. Btw I agree with you just saying.

[โ€“]shofofosho 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They absolutely can be wrong, you are right. It just hurts to see this practice continue.

[โ€“]Great-Flan-5896 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't block you and arguements can be used against ANYBODY! It doesn't matter who you are. Fuck off.

[โ€“]k0bra3eak 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's different if circumcision is performed due to medical necessity, a majority of male children do not need their foreskin removed for any reason and it's more likely to cause issues than it would've been to have left it alone until they are old enough to decide for themselves if they wish to be circumcised or not.

[โ€“]jadedyoungster 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I just said that. Did you read what I said?

My original point is that itโ€™s not a senseless. As the original commenter said.

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It shouldn't have to be spelled out that they weren't referring to rare situations like yours of males born with defective anatomy that couldn't respond normal treatment or prevention.

[โ€“][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Preventative healthcare is standard practice and the most effective form of healthcare. It's true the child cant consent, but since they cant consent to any medical procedures before 17, I dont see a problem with parents making a decision with proven health benefits in the long term, yet zero proven negative side effects.

[โ€“]shofofosho 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except it isn't preventing much of anything, just mutilating. Not only are the health benefits spurious or outright lies, but they are also irrelevant. "Reduces transmission of STDs". Cool. Babies don't have sex so there's no reason they can't choose to get the procedure when they are adults. I don't know how dumb you have to be to think that ripping off skin, which is full of nerves and protects the glans, fused to the head of the penis won'thave negative side effects. See Europe as a continental example of why you are wrong about it being necessary.

[โ€“]basefx 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would there be negative side effects if you nonconsensually touched and severed the prepuce from a healthy 30 year old person's genitals?

[โ€“]plainwalk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toenails can become ingrown and infected. Would you claim that pulling out all toenails (without anesthetics) is valid preventative medicine? Mammographies on all newborn girls to prevent breast cancer?

There has been no comprehensive study on the number of complications caused by routine circumcision and the number of issues from having a foreskin versus not to even begin to say if there is possibly enough benefit to justify all the deaths caused by infant MGM.

[โ€“]GiveBackMyRidgedBand 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Loss of highly erogenous tissue.

[+]24x7cumpump -16 points-15 points-14 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't cause any problems. Cry babies just wanna cry about it. Old wives tales about reduced sensation have never been scientificly proven. And it's much more hygenic. I was circumcised when I was a baby. No painful memory. No problems at all.

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh yeah. That large amount of nerves and skin that provides a safer natural lubricant, letโ€™s remove that in an irreversible procedure that could cause a deadly infection, often not even using anesthesia. Definitely wonโ€™t cause any problems at all.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

And it's much more hygenic

​

have never been scientificly proven

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

Here you go kid: https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/MC-for-HIV-Prevention-Fact-Sheet_508.pdf

"Circumcised men compared with uncircumcised men have also been shown in clinical trials to be less likely to acquire new infections with syphilis (by 42 percent), genital ulcer disease (by 48 percent), genital herpes (by 28 - 45 percent), and high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated with cancer (by 24 ..."

And it goes on. Happy to educate you, but try doing it yourself before making a fool out of yourself on social media. But i guess that's actually the point of trolling

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

This has been debunked multiple times, still idiots like you keep posting it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/hxmbpn/refutations_of_the_alleged_benefits_of_infant/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271841897\_A\_CDC-requested\_Evidence-based\_Critique\_of\_the\_Centers\_for\_Disease\_Control\_and\_Prevention\_2014\_Draft\_on\_Male\_Circumcision\_How\_Ideology\_and\_Selective\_Science\_Lead\_to\_Superficial\_Culturally-biased\_Recom

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Try getting a masters in a science before arguing that a single-author paper that is a technical report (not a peer review) is somehow more credible than a widely accepted peer reviewed report.

Thereโ€™s always a few outlying researchers for every topic, thatโ€™s how the scientific method and peer review works.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

You have cited 0 peer reviewed report, so much for a master in science.

Also nice that you dodged my first link, perhaps it has too many peer reviewed citations for a "master in science" like yourself.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I did ignore a Reddit post, yes. Why wouldnโ€™t I? Shouldโ€™ve said it linked to other things or posted the actual links.

But like the Reddit post, you can track down the peer reviewed papers that were summarized in the CDC report.

If there is true scientific debate on the topic, so be it. Iโ€™ll still trust peer review that simply monitored case studies vs peer review that attempts to prove its own hypothesis (usually a taboo practice).

The CDC isnโ€™t perfect, every scientific authority is prone to mistakes and they got weirdly political with Covid. But I donโ€™t see the politics here. There is a reason they chose the research I linked over yours, and I am going to assert that their opinion on the topic is better than either of ours.

My masters is in geology, so Iโ€™ll listen to the far more educated scientists over either of us. Youโ€™re arguing with the CDC in the end; Iโ€™m arguing with a kid on Reddit who thinks he is more medically informed than literal career medical experts with decades of experience.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I did ignore a Reddit post, yes. Why wouldnโ€™t I? Shouldโ€™ve said it linked to other things or posted the actual links.

If you clicked on it you would have known.

The CDC isnโ€™t perfect, every scientific authority is prone to mistakes and they got weirdly political with Covid. But I donโ€™t see the politics here.

Circumcision is more political than Covid. It has been for decades.

My masters is in geology, so Iโ€™ll listen to the far more educated scientists over either of us. Youโ€™re arguing with the CDC in the end; Iโ€™m arguing with a kid on Reddit who thinks he is more medically informed than literal career medical experts with decades of experience.

Nice example of appeal to authority fallacy.

BTW you are not arguing with me, you are arguing with plethora of scientific literature against circumcision. And almost every reputable non-US medical agency:

Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when โ€œmedical necessity is not established, โ€ฆinterventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.โ€
Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states โ€œthere is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene.โ€ It regards the non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors as a violation of physical integrity, and argues that boys should be able to make their own decisions about circumcision.
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) (2010) The RACP states that routine infant circumcision is not warranted in Australia and New Zealand. It argues that, since cutting children involves physical risks which are undertaken for the sake of merely psychosocial benefits or debatable medical benefits, it is ethically questionable whether parents ought to be able to make such a decision for a child.
British Medical Association (BMA) (2006) The BMA considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient as a justification for doing it. It suggests that it is โ€œunethical and inappropriateโ€ to circumcise for therapeutic reasons when effective and less invasive alternatives exist.
Expert statement from the German Association of Pediatricians (BVKJ) (2012) In testimony to the German legislature, the President of the BVKJ has stated, โ€œthere is no reason from a medical point of view to remove an intact foreskin from โ€ฆboys unable to give their consent.โ€ It asserts that boys have the same right to physical integrity as girls in German law, and, regarding non-therapeutic circumcision, that parentsโ€™ right to freedom of religion ends at the point where the childโ€™s right to physical integrity is infringed upon.
Danish Medical Association (DMA) (2020) Citing lack of consent of the child and his right to self-determination, along with a lack of health benefits which thus does not justify the risks of complications, pain, and loss of normal anatomy, the DMA concludes: โ€œFrom a medical and medical ethics perspective, the Danish Medical Association believes that the current practice of circumcising boys without a medical indication should cease.โ€

​

You might have a masters degree in science but you are no better than some illiterate when discussing science.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I donโ€™t have time to read medical journals all day. 3 peer reviewed papers is enough and 2/3 felt it helpful though unnecessary. But as far as governments go: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_Europe

And we know who runs European hospitals in majority. If you really want to make it political. Maybe I havenโ€™t been paying attention to the right prejudice.

[–]Fearless-File-36253 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Ahh yes here comes the antisemitism allegation, as if it doesn't exist in USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_United_States.

Also I don't see the relation between antisemitism in Europe and Canadian and Australian medical agencies being against circumcision. Last time I checked Canada and Australia were not in Europe. I guess geography works differently for someone with masters in geology.

[–]WikiSummarizerBot1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Antisemitism in the United States

Antisemitism in the United States has existed for centuries. In the United States, most Jewish community relations agencies draw distinctions between antisemitism, which is measured in terms of attitudes and behaviors, and the security and status of American Jews, which are both measured by the occurrence of specific incidents. FBI data shows that in every year since 1991, Jews were the most frequent victims of religiously motivated hate crimes, according to a report which was published by the Anti-Defamation League in 2019. Evidence suggests that the true number of hate crimes against Jews is underreported, as is the case for many other targeted groups.

<sup>[ </sup><sup>F.A.Q</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>Opt Out</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>Opt Out Of Subreddit</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>GitHub</sup><sup> ] Downvote to remove | v1.5</sup>

[–]WikiSummarizerBot1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Antisemitism in Europe

Antisemitism (also spelled anti-Semitism)โ€”prejudice, hatred of, or discrimination against Jews has experienced a long history of expression since the days of ancient civilizations, with most of it having originated in the Christian and pre-Christian civilizations of Europe.

<sup>[ </sup><sup>F.A.Q</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>Opt Out</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>Opt Out Of Subreddit</sup><sup> | </sup><sup>GitHub</sup><sup> ] Downvote to remove | v1.5</sup>

[โ€“][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL you found it. Yep, just pure reddit action here. Passionate claims followed by insulting people who are more informed for being just that. Isn't there a "reddit moment" sub we can immortalize this on?

[โ€“]GiveBackMyRidgedBand 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you still reach orgasm by stimulating your ridged band?

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What frame of reference are you using to say there are no problems at all when you had your prepuce removed before you even started puberty?

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These guys here crying "aaah genital amputation aahhh baaaad, me victim" are the male version.

Quite the opposite, literal genital mutilation fetishist flood / brigade the sub almost every month here

[โ€“]intactisnormal 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. (Full study.)

Also watch Dr. Guest discussing how the foreskin is heavily innervated, the mechanical function of the foreskin and its role in lubrication during sex, and the likelihood of decreased sexual pleasure for both male and partner.(for ~15 min)

[โ€“][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Look I like not having to deal with foreskin tbh

[โ€“]shofofosho 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If this procedure was done to you as a baby you literally have no point of reference on what it's like to "deal with foreskin"

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]shofofosho 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok. Just try and use empathy, for just a second. You are happy being cut. I am not. If they instead let us choose when we got older, you would still end up happily cut, and I would remain happy with a natural penis. If they cut us as babies, I get fucked over for no reason. Btw cutting your genitals to appease women isn't great, and women in Europe are the opposite, so it's a learned behaviour. Also you are missing out on one of the most sensitive parts of your penis, less sensation. It'd be like losing the ability to see red.

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How lucky that your doctor predicted you would want to be with shallow and toxic women who have a scarification fetish. Many aren't, especially if they wound up with complications from cutting including keloids, meatal stenosis/urethral stricturing, glans dehiscence, peyronie's disease, or amputation.

[โ€“]No-Satisfaction-2320 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Redditor pretends women see his cock

[โ€“][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Usually followed by a restrainer order

[โ€“]DarbyTilidin 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They are probably not even on pain killers or anything

[โ€“]wifiragist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If this is the Philippines (I'm not sure) then it's highly dependent on which region/building they are in, some people they got nailed in their foreskin with no anesthesia those are usually in places like basketball courts, some say, they got circumcised in hospitals and they get anesthesia and it's just a simple cut and stitch. Some say they got lasers.

(source: I'm a Filipino and these are some of the stories my peers and friends told me)

[โ€“]nebojssha 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is thi some SCP type of thing. I really dislike this timeline...

[โ€“]Heterodynist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

See, how could anyone be against this (he said JOKINGLY!!!)??

So this is what they are doing in Shanghai these days?

[โ€“]KR152A 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This makes me hate my mother so much more. My body my choice, right Mom? Thanks for mutilating my fucking body.

[+]Jacksonorlady -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

Iโ€™m not on the โ€œcircumcision is evilโ€ train. Maybe a hair misguided, but itโ€™s really not important.

[โ€“]Sininenn 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Okay, then why are you even here commenting on it?

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Leaving an opinion on a mens rights sub concerning a mens rights subreddit? Sounds rhetorical.

You seem to be saying that this sub should have entirely tribalistic, homogeneous views on everything. Iโ€™m here because I faced a false accusation. Im also a circumcised male.

Think itโ€™s safe to say Iโ€™m in the majority of men who see it as a nonissue. You can get heated at me on Reddit for that, but Iโ€™m not sure itโ€™s worth feeling anger just cause someone doesnโ€™t feel how you feel about it.

[โ€“]Sininenn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

If it's not important, why bother commenting on it then?

That is what I mean.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Like a said, just leaving the opinion of a circumcised male on a post about circumcision. I dont exactly use reddit for some purpose that matters; hope no one does. Gonna find emptiness if searching for meaning here.

it was just my first hand opinion of something that directly involves me, being circumcised and all. Thanks for not getting all hostile. Feel like the hostile trolls in here are burning accounts from FDS trying to make us look worse than we are.

Both accounts "harassing" me (trolls gonna troll) are 2 days and 11 days old. Sus to say the least

[โ€“]Sininenn 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Your opinion was that it isn't important to care about this issue...

Which was not an opinion regarding circumcision itself, but an option about what others find important - which is what I called you out on.

If you do not think that there is purpose in men discussing male genital mutilation, then, as I said, why bother commenting at all?

Maybe leaving an open mind, you might listen to those who care about it, and learn why they do so - and maybe even reconsider your opinion.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/MC-for-HIV-Prevention-Fact-Sheet_508.pdf

My opinion is that preventive care is the best kind of care. The nuance is that some cultures are sloppy.

[โ€“]Sininenn 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

And the reality is that condoms protect against HIV way better than medically unethically cutting off a piece of flesh based on flawed and ideologically tainted studies.

Besides, the foreskin contains cells designed to neutralize the HIV virus. How does cutting the foreskin help prevent HIV, when it removes these cells, as well as jncreases friction leading to higher risk of exposure?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langerhans_cell

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Itโ€™s not just HIV but a whole host of infections. Also, Id get circumcised weekly if it meant not using condoms anymore lol

Last part is a joke obviously (married, condoms are out), but I actually would take the preventive care over having to use a tool every time I have sex to achieve the same purpose.

[โ€“]Sininenn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No, circumcision definitely does not prevent HIV, nor any other virus or bacteria.

You can, and do contract HIV during unprotected sex even when circumcised, as is evident by the rates of HIV and circumcisions being higher in US populations, and in Africa, than in Europe.

There is preventative care which protects you from contracting HIV, which does not require you to mutilate your genitalia - which, like I said, does not prevent you from contracting HIV anyway. That care is called PrEP, and it actually protects you from HIV.

[–]Jacksonorlady0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You are really focused on HIV and ignoring all the other things. There is a Redditer commenting in here how he got an infection and seems pretty irritated people donโ€™t believe him.

Either way, Iโ€™m gonna take peer reviewed studies that were implemented into CDC policy over a Reddit comment section. Nothing on here has lead me to believe that the CDC is dead wrong on this.

They get weird over politicized topics like Covid, but in general medical advice they are pretty sound. These is an abundance of evidence that says it does prevent some of the other bacterial infections you seem to completely deny

[–]Sininenn1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Like I said before, infections can and should be treated with antibiotics.

For comparison, women get way more UTIs, and no health organization recommends cutting off their genitals to prevent them.

You might want to look at what European health organizations recommend, instead of taking my word for it. Or, at the very least, read some criticism of thr CDCs guidelines, of which there are many, as they are definitely not the ultimate, infallible authority.

Well, circumcision may prevent infections of the foreskin... Just like beheading prevents migraines and lobotomies prevent using the brain fully...

[–]Jacksonorlady0 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Antibiotics are terrible for you and only for use when symptoms are severe enough. They kill people every day. So preventive measures still seem better to me. Didnโ€™t we start this convo with someone who had to do it for medical reasons?

Iโ€™d rather get it over with than run into that or take more antibiotics in my life then a otherwise would have.

And come on with that last analogy. Both of those would kill your ass (lobotomy worse than death). Itโ€™d be more like cutting out a tumor rather than shrinking it chemically. Or amputating an infection

[–]shofofosho2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Except it isn't preventing much of anything, just mutilating. Not only are the health benefits spurious or outright lies, but they are also irrelevant. "Reduces transmission of STDs". Cool. Babies don't have sex so there's no reason they can't choose to get the procedure when they are adults. I don't know how dumb you have to be to think that ripping off skin, which is full of nerves and protects the glans, fused to the head of the penis won'thave negative side effects. See Europe as a continental example of why you are wrong about it being necessary.

[–]Sininenn1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Antibiotics are terrible for you and kill? As opposed to chopping off part of your dick, which actually doesn't help you, and can - and often does kill infant boys?

As I said before, circumcision does not prevent HIV, or infections. Condoms and proper hygiene do...

No, we didn't. We started it because you came here to claim It is not an issue, yet you continue to argue with me...

You're acting like antibiotics are worse than literally mutilating your genitals. Besides, you don't eat them like tic tacs and you only use them when you have a bacterial infection. There are even creams which don't flush your entire body...

The foreskin is not a tumor, though..It is a functional and important human body part.

I tried to give you the benefit of being uninformed, but you're being willfully ignorant. Have a great life.

[–]girraween1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

How is mutilating the genitals of a child a preventative measure??

[โ€“]Greg_W_Allan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The individual concerned wasn't commenting in good faith. It came here looking for a fight.

[โ€“]matrixislife 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

For some men the difference between having and not having a foreskin might be minor. It doesn't matter, the real point is that it's done without your consent. Body integrity is a human right that is inviolate quite rightly in little girls, no one can give permission for FGM, but little boys get treated completely differently. That's not ok, especially with all the potential harm caused by circumcisions.

[+]Jacksonorlady -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I didnโ€™t consent to existence either, which is inherently unfair from start to finish. This is a โ€œpick your battlesโ€ issue for me. Thatโ€™s all.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Is the best response you can think of ?

Do you also go around telling rape victims to get over it because "I didnโ€™t consent to existence either" ?

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

False equivalence. As someone who has been falsely accused, had a far larger impact on my life than Depp, discrimination in courts is what brought me to this sub.

If you think cutting off foreskin before you can form a memory of it is the same as rape, you might be a serious pos

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

False equivalence.

No it's not. In both case the person didn't give the consent to the action performed on their body.

Not a hard concept to grasp.

If you think cutting off foreskin before you can form a memory of it is the same as rape, you might be a serious pos

I didn't compare rape and circumcision, I compared the nature of consent in them.

[โ€“][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

As if the context of what you are consenting to doesnt matter. Complete strawman argument. You got upset that he compared one area where a man cant consent (circumcision) to another (birth), and then you immediately did the exact same thing.

At least in his comparison, the unborn and newborn genuinely dont have the ability to consent one way or another.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

you immediately did the exact same thing.

Yeah I did the same thing to show him how he is wrong.

You being so triggered on my comparison just proves my point.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

โ€œI was a hypocrite to make a pointโ€. So a straw man. You just keep admitting it lol. Genius level stuff from the middleschooler

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just because you can't understand doesn't mean it is a strawman.

[โ€“]Jacksonorlady -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

No point arguing with a straw man/kid.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Quite a nice way to describe yourself.

[โ€“][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This child is so self-diluted, it'd be funny if it wasnt so pathetic.

Elsewhere, someone brought up how loss of sensation isnt proven, but then immediately followed it with how it is more sanitary (scientifically proven to reduce infections). This kid pull his strawman card so hard that he pretended like the commenter said BOTH werent scientifically proven. Imagine being so dense that you cant even differentiate between two entirely separate claims - on proven while another isnt. His profile is young enough to where i assume hes just a troll. His name looks autogenerated. He'll respond to this within a few minutes to prove my point

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Lmao idiot, keep being triggered. Stop seething so much, you might make some sense.

[–][deleted]1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You used triggered like a translesbian pedo lol. No one is seething but you, think we are just having fun with a very naive child. I replied to you cause when I make fun of people, I prefer to do it to there face and want that other guy to get a good chuckle out of your hilarious profile.

It's brand new and exclusively for trolling. But you wasted your incel trolling time on us! ugh feels fucking gooooooood. Like keeping a telemarketer on the phone longer than they want.

[–]Fearless-File-36251 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Bro you wrote two full comments and not made an ounce of sense.

Looks like the doctor performed a lobotomy instead of circumcision on you.

[–]Jacksonorlady1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Says the bot with zero substance in their comments. All you have is baseless insults. You show your hand by not addressing the topic. Silly bot accounts, theyre all the same

[–]Fearless-File-36251 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

All you have is baseless insults.

Irony here is quite delicious.

[–]Jacksonorlady1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Perfect ๐Ÿ™Œ

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You consent to existence by staying alive, you're not as clever as you think you are.

[โ€“]SCP_foundation08 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the philippines everyone expects you to be circumsized if you're not circumsized you're made fun of once you'ce reached a certain age

[+]goatee_ -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

honestlyโ€ฆi donโ€™t see whatโ€™s wrong with thisโ€ฆ Iโ€™m from an asian country and when I was 6, 7 years old I got circumcised the same way. Itโ€™s good for your health, is it???

[โ€“]hailtotheking999 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's not good for your health. Pretty much all of Europe thinks circumcision is bad and in the United States doctors make extra money for doing the circumcision and then sell the clippings to skin care companies.

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would it be considered wrong for someone to nonconsensually touch and sever the prepuce from a healthy 30 year old person's genitals?

[โ€“]nacho-chonky 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope the so called โ€œbenefitsโ€ are basically itโ€™s easier to keep clean... if your not cleaning your penis then thatโ€™s a personal hygiene problem not a foreskin problem.... not to mention the laundry list of risks associated with circumcising. And the issue with the complete lack of consent on an extremely violating surgical procedure

[+]Ambitious-Producer -45 points-44 points-43 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I have 2 questions.

  1. Where is this located?

  2. Whatโ€™s bad about circumcising?

[โ€“]GiveBackMyRidgedBand 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Loss of erogenous tissue

[โ€“]YoGGi_Le_Tulpa 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Performing mutilation on (not consenting) children is usually considered "bad" by sane people

[โ€“]DecimatingDarkDeceit 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. Almost everyone knows the answers about that. I am sure some mod could post you the answers

[โ€“]Mikeferdy 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. Removal of healthy tissue from a pre-pubescent boy who doesn't understand the implication of such surgery is generally a big no-no.

The foreskin acts as a mechanical lubricant during intercourse/masturbation, thus allowing safer intercourse/masturbation in the absence of lubrication.

The foreskin is also a sensitive dermal organ that is similar to the tips of fingers. Removal of those deprive a person of the full experience of sexual intercourse/masturbation. Imagine having hands but the skin of your fingertips removed.

And all these are done before the boy is capable of understanding what he will be missing thus can be considered exploitative.

Believing in big daddy in the sky is no excuse.

[โ€“]intactisnormal 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. (Full study.)ย 

Also watch Dr. Guest discussing how the foreskin is heavily innervated, the mechanical function of the foreskin and its role in lubrication during sex, and the likelihood of decreased sexual pleasure for both male and partner.(for ~15 min)

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's bad about unneccisarily touching and cutting a healthy nonconsenting 30 year old's person's genitals that couldn't be applied to this situation?

[โ€“]No-Satisfaction-2320 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. It rarely has any health benefits, it can lead to serious issues (people have actually died from the procedure) and the worst thing is that they're doing it to children who can't consent to it.

[+]OkAccountant2598 -61 points-60 points-59 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why couldn't they have done this when the kid was a baby. I'm sure those kids in the picture were born in hospitals, even in China.

[โ€“]03Randomguy 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is never ok to cuts childrenโ€™s genitals. Also this is most likely the Philippines not china.

[โ€“]GiveBackMyRidgedBand 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like they mutilate girls in Malaysia and Indonesia, at the hospital, as newborns so they donโ€™t remember.

[+]JordanLeeT -35 points-34 points-33 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

To everyone says this is disgusting .. itโ€™s better than living with bacteria around ur penis

[โ€“]k0bra3eak 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for telling everyone you don't clean your penis

[โ€“]Sininenn 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You literally have bacteria everywhere in and on your body.

Your mouth is full of them, so is your belly button, your ears, your nose, your anus, your skin and its creases and the entire digestive tract is full of bacteria.

[โ€“]YoGGi_Le_Tulpa 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh no! I have to have basic hygiene and wash my junk when I'm showering, what an awful price for having good sensations!

[โ€“]Potato-with-guns 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you not understand how bacteria works? Itโ€™s literally everywhere, tons of it in your mouth and guts and all over your skin, not to mention the mites.

[โ€“]GiveBackMyRidgedBand 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You still have bacteria in your penis. What you donโ€™t have is all the nerve endings that were located in the foreskin.

[โ€“]Significant-Error545 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Soap, water and one figure my friend its not hard

[โ€“]shofofosho 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pro genital mutilation, doesn't understand basic science. No surprise.

[โ€“]girraween 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why donโ€™t you clean your penis? Thatโ€™s disgusting.

[โ€“]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is having one's genitals cut in a nonsterile environment and doing genital wound care not counterproductive?

[+]Jethr0Paladin -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

ITT: this sub shows, once again, that it's a front for antisemitism.

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anti circumcision is not antisemitic but that is too nuanced for you to understand.

[โ€“]disayle32 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Any religion that requires babies of either gender to be mutilated in order to be "saved" is barbaric, backwards, and has no place in modern society.

[โ€“]shofofosho 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Think. Hard. All Jewish men are supposed to be circumcised, but not all circumcised people are Jewish. Not anti Semitic as it's not a Jewish only practice. Try again.

[โ€“]No-Satisfaction-2320 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Quick question, do you support FGM? If not, why are you so Islamophobic?

[โ€“]Jethr0Paladin -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, Islam has made it their mission to destroy Israel. I couldn't care less about them or their practices.

[โ€“]No-Satisfaction-2320 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel the same about Israel.

[โ€“]Jethr0Paladin 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As expected, fascist incel in the incel sub.

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]Neat_Zookeepergame99 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Babies can't choose to get mutilated. Most mutilations are done to boys, so it is a men's rights issue.

[โ€“][deleted] 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[โ€“]Neat_Zookeepergame99 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The infant isn't making the choice.

And if you think male genital mutilation is a good thing, then I invite you to watch this lecture https://youtu.be/FCuy163srRc

[โ€“]Greg_W_Allan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With a lotta anesthetics to help with the pain.

Wrong.

[โ€“]shofofosho 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is a men's rights issue. Where was my right to bodily integrity when this was performed?

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is not a choice if parents make it.

[โ€“]bahdboi -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Parents' make most decisions for their children. Kids can't make serious decisions. So relax about that. Enjoy your foreskin, and leave those who want to cut theirs off

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kids are not little slaves to their parents, they can't whatever they want with their kids. Parents have to have decisions that is in the best interest of the kid, circumcision is clearly not.

By your logic, parents should be allowed to amputate the limbs of their newborns.

​

leave those who want to cut theirs off

"those" never had the choice to choose whether they want to cut or not.

[โ€“]shofofosho 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think you are hearing yourself. You say leave those who want to cut theirs off. The baby isn't CHOOSING to cut its foreskin off, that's the problem. They literally cannot choose to "enjoy their foreskin" because the parents chose to mutilate them.

[โ€“]intactisnormal 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

or put your child through it

The standard to intervene on someone else's body is medical necessity. The Canadian Paediatrics Society puts it well:

โ€œNeonatal circumcision is a contentious issue in Canada. The procedure often raises ethical and legal considerations, in part because it has lifelong consequences and is performed on a child who cannot give consent. Infants need a substitute decision maker โ€“ usually their parents โ€“ to act in their best interests. Yet the authority of substitute decision makers is not absolute. In most jurisdictions, authority is limited only to interventions deemed to be medically necessary. In cases in which medical necessity is not established or a proposed treatment is based on personal preference, interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices. With newborn circumcision, medical necessity has not been clearly established.โ€

To override someone's body autonomy rights the standard is medical necessity. Without necessity the decision goes to the patient themself, later in life. Circumcision is very far from being medically necessary.

If an adult wants to circumcise themself, they are absolutely free to do so.

[โ€“]Neppy_sama 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can blame Abraham for circum his own son as for sacrifice to the God. When he could've done on himself to prove his loyalty to God.

[โ€“]ForeignSatisfaction0 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Anybody have a backstory for this?

[โ€“]LettuceBeGrateful 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably a mass event done in the Philippines. They circumcise boys in early puberty.

[โ€“]moonfanatic95 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel bad for whoever had to censor this

[โ€“]_Renardeau 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What. The. Fuck.

[โ€“]GreatBayTemple 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fucking evil.

[โ€“]TheRealRansomz 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What country?

[โ€“]Fearless-File-3625 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Philippines.

[โ€“]AngryErrandBoy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Traumatic and humiliating

[โ€“]Enaatisha 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay what the fly fuck is this shit. That's right fucked

[โ€“]theAliasOfAlias 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting

[โ€“]xX_avocadoman_Xx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that looks clean

[โ€“]Harbinger0fdeathIVXX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Excuse me? What the fuck.

[โ€“]Chikia12187 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WTH

[โ€“]wonderfulcupofbleach 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision is wrong...but this is some odd justification...not that you need any other than full body autonomy...

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

ยฉ TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter