A somewhat common refrain in regards to single mothers is that single mothers should just "put their kids up for adoption" instead of raising their kids in a single parent household. Presumably, this is because being raised in a one-parent household greatly increases a child's likelihood of adverse life outcomes.

If putting a kid up for adoption is so much better, then, single mothers should put their kids up for adoption en masse.

Would this go off without a hitch? Well, kids in the foster care system are more likely to have adverse childhood experiences than kids raised by single mothers. Is this unfortunate? Yes. Will putting more kids in the foster care system somehow change this? Probably not. But will those kids be out of the hands of single mothers? Yes.

And if single mothers really are the problem, then separating their children from them (EDIT: MEANING THE SINGLE MOTHERS GIVING UP THEIR KIDS AS THEIR OWN IDEA - WITH NO COERCION ON THE PART OF THE GOVERNMENT) should make the world a better place, right?