I try to look at this from different perspectives. Maybe with the communities and peer groups I have been in, I have been more accustomed to seeing women being dickmatized than what is normal, but I doubt it.

I am trying to empathize with women who make men who they deem as husband or boyfriend material wait for sex in order to build a connection or an emotional investment before sex.

As a redpill aware man, I have become jaded to the whole idea of waiting and shrug off a lack of somewhat immediate desire to have sex as a woman not being interested (which is true for many), and I see it as cheating a man by tricking him to pay (financially, time-wise, or otherwise) for what someone else has gotten free, but perhaps, it is just a strategy to secure a man, who has a natural inclination towards shying away from committing to "easy" women.

It is not honest, but it is perfectly understandable.

I understand that some women are able to separate their sexual needs and needs for companionship and have only sex with men who only bring sexual value to their loves. I also see that there are cases where women make casual sex strict with boundaries and do not get too close to him, but because I have seen many dickmatized women, I see women start off as casual and end up allowing the man to drive their cars, open them up deeply on a sexual and emotional level, eat their kids' snacks, cheat repeatedly, and many remain faithful to the man throughout this stint.

What I want to know is what do women (who make men wait), have to offer that man, that a man, who could have sex with her on that first night, not be privileged to have or experience?

I already do not believe in the myth of the prudish woman and nonsexual (sexual) women, but I feel that being offended by a woman desiring to wait is not necessarily helpful either.