If you remember, I recently did a post on how most divorced ‘jaded’ women I know caught STIs in ‘committed’ longterm relationships with a cheating low value spouse, as opposed to being ‘wreckless whores’ having casual sex with different men. This is because men rarely get tested or have the decency to wear condoms when cheating- and often the man was serial cheating on them for a while with various women (a huge reason why we’re pro-snooping here, quick to cut off men at the sign of red flags and totally advise against taking them back or forgiving them).

We’ve had a quite few FDSers who work in sex clinics echo similar here - that most women who come through their doors caught one off their cheating partners by surprise as opposed to ‘riding the cock carousel’ single. According to these women- the single female patients are usually sleeping with one guy at the same time and regularly get tested if they’re concerned ....however the single men seem to rely on their new partners (however many) telling them they’re clean and some are only getting their first test done at 30 years old🙃 . Wow don’t your ovaries just leap with joy at the sound of that!!

They also tell us the single men are often sleeping with ridiculous numbers of women from dating apps in one year, having condom free sex with multiple at a time - whereas the single women have normally been having a casual thing with just the one dude for a set amount of months and then possibly a new one later on. So essentially the single women are pacing themselves out & testing more frequently than the single men. Surprise...

So much for all these poor innocent sexless men seeking longterm genuine companionship! Ohhhhhh let me get out my tissues for them and their degenerate x rated porn histories 🥲. That’s not what the women who work at sex clinics are telling us. They tell us that most women in LTR’s are catching STIs from men serial cheating on them behind their backs on dating apps. They’re telling us men are coming in to get tested for the FIRST time at 30 years old after sleeping with stupid amounts of women that year- with no protection.

But Medusa - where are these men finding so many women to have casual sex with at the same time? Surely the women are being just as bad then? Not really. That’s the manosphere’s confirmation biased theory- where they conveniently leave out the part where they knowingly & frequently go to extreme lengths to deceive several women seeking stable longterm relationships at a time. A small portion are behaving wild - most are being scammed by degenerate lying men.

Most men lie about their intentions /personalities- which is why women are forced to cut them off and have to start all over again. How the fuck is that women’s problem? Men have much much lower standards for casual sex than women do- they are also more porn fried. It’s not in most women’s incentive to seek constant casual sex partners (too many risks)- even if they have the opportunity . But it is in men’s. And they will lie, frequently, to get it.

And that brings me to ....the wonderful ‘dating’ apps that give them access to 100s of single women in a 50 mile radius. He can easily find 3 single liberal feminist ‘sex pozzy ‘ types / 50/50 Pickmeisha’s to sleep with fast that month. ‘Dating’ apps were designed for men.....to cater to the overspill of pornsick low value men hunting for casual sex often as they mostly see women as interchangeable sexual objects. It’s easy cheap and free.

So what I can gather from that is...even if the women are engaging in casual sex....they’re probably waiting out a good amount of time between partners b4 jumping to a new one and find it easier to find an ongoing casual sex partner however the (desperate) men are just bouncing from woman to woman on dating apps because they receive far more rejection and have MUCH lower standards for casual sex than women do (less risk of violence /rape) - and those apps give them a much bigger pool to fish from in terms of casual sex.

This would make sense to me as women find it easy to keep a man on their tail for ongoing casual sex, then men do with women. The lowest of low scrotes tend to get axed faster and have to bounce from woman to woman because no one will tolerate them long. Women don’t need to do that - they can easily hookup with an old flame - they don’t have to constantly seek fresh supply like low value men do.

A man will gladly keep a casual sex arrangement with an ex or woman he doesn’t even like much for as long as he can - but women are quicker to discard of a casual sex arrangement if the guy turns out to be too much of a dick (risk of violence/rape etc) . Which means low value men are repeatedly put back on the conveyer belt scouting for sex- where women will wait out longer until they try again. Or they will just strike up with an ex.

For example in real life, it is much harder for men to rock up to a woman and see if she’s down for casual sex. She might have a boyfriend. She might be with hostile friends. She might be too busy. She might not have any interest in him at all. There’s lots of what ifs in his way. There is also far more competition anxiety in real life and less women will bite. There is more potential for public rejection and men are complete porn fried sissies who need instant ego stroking now- so they prefer the safety net of dating apps where they can save face. Also because they’re in public - if they’re zooming in on one woman trying to get her into bed and chatting to her for hours - it makes it harder for them to approach others.

Which moves me onto the central reason why low value scrotes LOVE dating apps and why they don’t benefit high value women at all. They can lie about themselves much easier- even their name and ages. You can’t snoop out their friends/reputations unless they give you their social media. It’s harder to sniff them out.

They can talk to several at a time that they KNOW are single and all ready to mingle . There’s no friends in the way - there’s no public rejection putting them off- just a bunch of randomers on an easy app (hence why they get far more brave on there with the audacity- less real life consequences).

They can get opportunities with women they normally wouldn’t bump into or would get rejected by. These women know little about them or them or their tempers. They can have them meet up at spots where he can’t bump into x y z plate. It’s all very casual, in their favour and low effort/potential high reward. He can attempt to get them drunk and fast track them into bed without them knowing who they are. And it’s set up in his favour. He could do that a lot if he has the gift of the gab & finds enough eager 50/50 Pickmeisha’s.

Again I would like to highlight how much cheap ‘coffee’ ‘walk’ dates aid such men. It is barely any effort at all. Most men offering such cheap dates are going on several failed ones at a time in a bid to score casual sex. You’re naive if you think otherwise. A cheap low effort man doesn’t care who the legs belong to as long as it’s cheap and low effort access. That’s his only concern.

Dating apps pull up 100s of potential single candidates in a 50 mile radius that they normally wouldn’t ever bump into- younger naive women , all kinds. Which despite what they claim - gives them far better odds for casual sex than real life. A good portion of those single women might of came out of relationships or got bored of waiting out and now be more privvy to a fling.

Or they go on an online date, get too drunk and end up sleeping with him fast and it turns casual. So essentially dating apps are a cheating scrotes wet dream. They can easily scout out a few casual women to cheat on their SO with and often, without it getting back to them. And it’s why so many men on dating apps are low value disappointments. They never leave them- even in relationships. It’s too tempting for scrotes . They stay on that conveyer belt - because it suits them. Which is why I think high value women should boycott them and leave those men to the streets. Men on dating apps have already been eating their cake - do not believe their lies. And most of them, had you met them naturally first hand - would of never given them a chance...let’s be honest.