TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Student has grade docked for using 'mankind' in English paper instead of a gender-neutral alternative

JohnKimble111

March 31, 2017
2510 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=8986
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Student has grade docked for using 'mankind' in English paper instead of a gender-neutral alternative
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 2510
Comments 199
Date March 31, 2017 5:53 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/62jhay/student_has_grade_docked_for_using_mankind_in/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/student-has-grade-docked-for-using-mankind-in.927319
https://theredarchive.com/post/927319
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]mcavvacm 254 points255 points256 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

I'm an aspiring English teacher, and I will NEVER enforce such ridiculous rules as banning the word mankind for being sexist. Mankind IS gender neutral just to put some icing on this cake.

How absurd.

[–]Psychic42 125 points126 points127 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I had an anthro teacher that gave me an F on my final paper because I wasn't gender neutral enough. Like seriously, I know my paper wasn't good, but using that as the reason. No male in that class got higher than a C on that paper except for the gay kid

[–]mcavvacm 107 points108 points109 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That says so much more about that teacher than it does about you. :/

[–]Psychic42 57 points58 points59 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah she was a raging misandrist. Happened first semester in college and k moped the fuck out of continuing with any class in anthropology, which was luckily not my major

[–]tigrn914 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Shit. Should have gone to the Dean. If there's legit evidence you should make their time as a professor just as miserable as they made your time as a student under them.

[–]pocketknifeMT 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol. The dean has a working relationship with this tenured professor.

Students are merely the regretable drawback to running a school. These jobs would be great without all the fucking students around the place.

Unless your proof is ironclad, shit isn't going to go your way, and then you have new enemies.

[–]WadeTheWilson 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And lawsuits are the drawback of having sexist teachers. They would have not done much to the teacher, but they would have changed your grade. I had issues like this, and that's how it happened. On every assignment. I had to go to the higher up in that department and complain.

[–]Hasmond 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the dean doesn't respond wouldn't it be possible to contact local newspapers?

[–]Psychic42 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She was tenured, I am lazy and I passed with a C cause she couldn't fuck with me on a multiple choice test.

[–]twodogsfighting 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tenure doesn't make you invulnerable from lawyers.

[–]fgejoiwnfgewijkobnew 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd write to the dean and have your paper published in the local newspaper.

Headline: Prof Gives Student F on Paper for Using Word 'Mankind'

Public embarrassment is an effective tool.

Even if the paper was a few years old I would still try to do this. Think of all the poor students getting screwed over by her right now...

[–]Seventh_______ 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm gay and I'd rather fail with the rest of the men so I have reason to fight it...

[–]pocketknifeMT 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I have had professors mark words they didn't know as 'wrong' instead of taking 2 sec to google it. English professors.

[–]mcavvacm 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

When I see words I don't know I do indeed google them.

More often than not it's just an extreme typo.

[–]machinerer 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hell half the time I do that with words I already know, but rarely use, just to double check the meaning and relevant synonyms.

[–]mcavvacm 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah me too. Just to make sure I'm using them correctly.

[–]MomoYaseen 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting! Considering the form of the word, can you please explain the linguistics behind why "Mankind" is gender neutral?

I am really interested in under why.

[–]mcavvacm 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Revoran in this thread explained it quite thoroughly. I'll recommend reading what he posted.

[–]Joshuages 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Thank you. Globalism and hysterical feminism found it's roots in hiding academics. You will help the resistance.

[–]twomillcities 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Globalism =/= hysterical feminism. I'm not even sure why you mentioned that. It's like your begging for MRA to become another right-wing safespace. Go over to the infowars comment section if you want to whine about globalism.

This sub was so much better before all the altright subs got banned. Now a bunch of ultra conservatives are steering us the wrong way.

[+]Joshuages -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Do you get called a whiney cunt often? "anyone who disagrees with me is an alt right nazi". I don't know what infowars is, but you and your company are the reason nobody takes your activism seriously.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He's right in that it's a weird thing to link together. Plus, the leftists in academia aren't exactly fans of globalism either. It's the economists who advocate for that, and for good reason too.

[–]Joshuages -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's pitched in all levels of curriculum. The idea being that resources balance out. They shouldn't like it because it serves the global elite better.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's pitched in economics classes, because free trade and immigration are hugely beneficial on the net. I'm not a huge fan of the global governance aspect, but otherwise it's great. There's a reason for why free trade and open markets are one of the few things just about every economist agrees on.

[–]twomillcities 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"you and your company are the reason no one takes your activism seriously" and there it is folks. Dude doesn't take MRA seriously and only wants to advance an altright / anti-liberal agenda.

What's your problem with globalism? you need a safe space from minorities and world peace or something you poor snowflake?

[–]Joshuages -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Addendum to this, this user is a self proclaimed SJW by their comment history and they are very pro-pronoun. Why he or she is in here could be attributed to some shilling behaviour.

[–]twomillcities 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

link to where i'm saying i'm an SJW in my comment history rofl.

i'm a leftist. i want equality. it's why i support MRA. men have it fucked with domestic abuse, homelessness, myths about the pay gap, child custody, alimony, and the list goes on and on and on.

i don't think we can solve this problem from the right. the right says "stop changing shit, feminism is changing shit" and i'm saying that feminism did change shit and it was fine in the beginning. women got the right to vote, and then they started getting a fair shot at education and a fair chance at the same careers as men. and once we had that, and women started getting paid fairly, that should have been it. but it didn't stop there, it kept going, and now the pendulum has swung too far. we don't need to stop the pendulum where it is. the right says "leave shit as-is". leaving shit as-is means we'll still have males making up the majority of homeless people. we'll still have men being arrested 9 out of 10 times the cops come to respond to a domestic dispute. we'll still have women getting away with murder when men get the book thrown at them.

that's not what we need. we need to swing the pendulum the other way. we need to use that energy, the same energy that propelled women to equality (and beyond), and help the men that need it now. men that are more worried about seeing their children, or keeping half of their paycheck from their ex-wives, than they're worried about stupid fucking gender pronouns or your phobia of globalism / peace

[–]Joshuages 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, so me assuming your entire belief system based on one reddit interaction isn't rational? Ok, got it.

[–]Joshuages -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not at all.

[–]SenorTrumper -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Take a Midol and get a good night's sleep. We don't need you going FULL RETARD SJW on us.

[–]Revoran 471 points472 points473 points 9 years ago* (36 children) | Copy Link

'Mankind' is gender neutral. Fucking morons.

For starters, it comes from the Old English 'man' meaning humans/people and 'cynde', which had a similar meaning to modern words like 'species' or 'race' (hence "the human race").

The word 'human' did not exist back then. It is a combination of 'hue' and 'man' meaning colour/appearance of a person. So 'human' came from 'man', not the other way around (and so by their logic, it is just as sexist as 'mankind'). from Latin.

In Old English, male people were called 'wereman' and female people 'wifman'. At some point the 'were' was dropped (it still survives in 'werewolf' - literally man-wolf), while 'wifman' was shortened over time to 'wimman' and now 'woman'. 'Wif' still survives in the word 'wife'.

I can see an argument that other words derived from 'man' could cause confusion. For instance to avoid confusion we now say 'layperson' instead of 'layman'. This is not the case with 'mankind'. Only a moron would think that referred to males (perhaps the same sort of moron who would refer to 'womankind').

Certainly fucking English professors should know better than this.

So when you read Lord of the Rings and Tolkien talks about the "race of Men", it's because he was a linguistics professor and actually knew his shit, unlike these ignoramuses. He was also a bit sexist, but that's just incidental - the guy was born in the 19th century and all.

[–]redheadedalex 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In Swedish, (Germanic in origin, as is English) "man" still means "one", or like, an individual. ie 'man kan inte' is "one can not" hopefully this explanation makes sense. It's still used in the original form.

[–]super_franzs 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I though "Man kan inte" meant more like "a man can not"

[–]redheadedalex 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Just think of it as "one" in a more formal version of English, that's how it's used.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Spoonwood 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the Indo-European languages, man has always ment male human.

you can easily look them up on sites like wiktionary or etymology online, if you can spare the five minutes of your life.

No, it hasn't.

"Old English man, mann "human being, person (male or female [emphasis added]); brave man, hero; servant, vassal," from Proto-Germanic *manwaz (source also of Old Saxon, Swedish, Dutch, Old High German man, German Mann, Old Norse maðr, Danish mand, Gothic manna "man"), from PIE root *man- (1) "man" (source also of Sanskrit manuh, Avestan manu-, Old Church Slavonic mozi, Russian muzh "man, male")."

http://archive.is/AJ8ua

[–]ModernApothecary 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Words including the syllable man don't come with a "This syllable man is not derived from the word man as you know it but another gender-neutral word that just happened to evolve to sound the same" warning, and it's very easy to just assume that there might be a relation.

I get that, but we're talking about an assumption. There aren't any words that come with a warning phrase explaining them, that's up to the person who is using the words. The word bears no responsibility to define itself to the person using it, that's... silly. The teacher making the assumption is the one who deserves criticism. Moron might be a strong word, but when a person of authority puts their sexist agenda before being technically correct, as a teacher, that strikes me as an overstep. Shelve your personal agenda, and teach your subject properly. If they're docking marks for the use of non-gender-neutral words, that in itself is appalling, but it stands to reason that this teacher is intentionally imbuing their subject material with feminist propaganda, including but not limited to censorship of any word even remotely (or in this case, not even actually connected) attached to masculinity. To be doing it based on a mistaken assumption, now we're talking about a moron, fair is fair.

And the phrase that gave my 9th grade science teacher a huge smile every time someone gave him a reason to proclaim it: When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME!

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Etymologist checking in. I'm under the impression that this "human" word was originally an adjective--akin to AmericAN--where the root "hum" refers to the EARTH from which "god" made the first one. Related word: humus (e.g. soil).

Regarding the "man" portion as referring to the male gender is a mistake of the feminazi persuasion.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I was going to upvote you for appearing educated and correct with your assessment but then you decided to be an asshole.

[+]Kildigs -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Your comment reminded me that upvotes are for people that add value to the conversation instead of a "like" button. So i downvoted you and upvoted them for you since they actually put effort into their comment. No one here cares that you got all butthurt.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

So i downvoted you and upvoted them for you since... blah blah blah

What's it like living a life so pathetic that you place value on fake internet points?

[–]Manny_Kant 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't he responding to you explaining your allocation of fake internet points?

Calling his life pathetic seems a bit hypocritical, no? Or is that the joke?

[–]Kildigs 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't know. Why not tell me?

[–]meh613 -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm downvoting me because I'm exhibiting faux education by using big(ly?) words and I invite other denizens to join suit and make this the most downvoted comment in reddit history, muhaha! :)

[–]speedisavirus 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bigly is a real word. Use it correctly.

[–]meh613 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope you downvoted the comment, /u/speedisavirus ?

[–]psilorder 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She doesn't care what it actually came from, she only cares that there are people who think it came from man.

[–]Revoran 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Human comes from Latin humanus, "of mankind", ultimately from the Proto.-Indo-European word for earth. At no point has there been an "only males" connotation to it.

Yeah that's why that section was stuck-through with the explanation added. Thanks for the further clarification.

wer and man both were and have always been separate words, one wasn't dropped from the other. But even still, in the Indo-European languages, man has always ment male human.

It seems like you're correct that they have been different words.

However, all the sources online I can find indicate that man still primarily meant humans in Old English, with the sense of adult males only coming on later, while wer meant adult males before falling out of use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_(word)

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=man

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/man#Etymology

Wifman is literally wife man, as far back as the words can be traced.

It seems like that's not the case:

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=wife

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wif#Etymology_3

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=woman


In any case, it should be clear to any English professor reading a student's paper that mankind is not a sexist term designed to exclude women. It's unreasonable to demand that students stop using it or face losing marks. The whole thing reeks of pushing an agenda not with good intentions but just to be persnickety.

dont' make up shit just to prove a point. The origin of English words is pretty well documented and you can easily look them up on sites like wiktionary or etymology online, if you can spare the five minutes of your life.

Lol, maybe next time, before you accuse me of making shit up, you should take 5 minutes out of your life to look shit up on wiktionary or etymology online.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PmYourWittyAnecdote 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You read wrong,

Comes from the Latin for 'earth'.

[–]lestratege27 points 9 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

The word 'human' did not exist back then. It is a combination of 'hue' and 'man' meaning colour/appearance of a person.

That's a funny one, but completely off.

[–]Revoran 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah shit, my bad. What's the actual etymology?

Edit: Apparently from Latin via Old French.

[–]KingRobotPrince 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That pretty much blew my mind. Genna go and look this up now.

Thank you.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]chortle-guffaw 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Professor: "Words mean what I say they mean, not what the dictionary says they mean."

[–]Cragnous 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

lol, I'll take things you've forgotten for $500.

Seriously, what you are saying is that feminists should try and bring back wereman to balance things out again.

So this sub is also all wrong and should be The Wereman's Rights. Then people coming here would except some half-man/half-man creature.

[–]Revoran 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

What I'm saying is that any English professor reading an English paper should understand that the word 'mankind' is inclusive of all humans, and not a sexist gendered term designed to exclude women.

It's not like 'fireman' which refers to men only (which is why we say firefighter to be inclusive).

[–]Raisin_Cane 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said. This professor is an idiot. As an English teacher myself (not a professor), I find this type of ignorance to be absolutely inexcusable. She's teaching English, for Christ's sake!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=man

[–]DrippingHotButter 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This comment deserves multiple gold stars and all of the upvotes

[–]PmYourWittyAnecdote -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No it doesn't, it's factually incorrect bollocks

[–]Revoran -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What part of what I said is factually incorrect bollocks?

[–]PmYourWittyAnecdote 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The origins of the word mankind?

The origins of human?

Basically everything.

[–]DieselFuel1 47 points48 points49 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

No more 'evolution of man'. It's now 'evolution of man, woman, intersex, and non binary.'

[–]TankVet 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

-1 for Darwin

[–]jostler57 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Rolling in his/her/their grave.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

it's

[–]Scarbane 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Its*

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks! I need to review before I submit.

[–]Revoran 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Biologists usually say "evolution of humans" or they use scientific words with specific meanings like "anatomically modern humans" "behaviourally modern humans" "homo sapiens" etc. This is to avoid confusion.

But no one is going to be confused by the use of "mankind" in an English paper. This is just moronic.

[–]Spoonwood 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Darwin's book was called:

The Descent of Man.

Creationists aren't saying "but he was only talking about men... he left out the women!"

[–]zaisoke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

first you would have to get laid, and procreate to "evolve" on a species level, these people cant get laid, let alone procreate. Plus, their genes are probably as weak an old man dying of cancer.

[–]manukoleth 104 points105 points106 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

He should have used "assholes" instead of mankind. That's pretty much gender neutral. I don't understand where's the world upto these days.

[–]Manny_Kant 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's pretty much gender neutral.

And the professor would know she wasn't left out.

[–]Swiss_Cheese9797 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"And god created an asshole out of clay, and from his rib he created yet some other asshole. And lo, did a reptilian asshole say unto them' hey assholes, eat this apple' And god declared the garden was not for assholes"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They would still say thats men based.

[–]manukoleth 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But there isn't many words. If we use human they would say there is man in that. If we use Homosapien they would say there is a Homo in that.

[–]TankVet 42 points43 points44 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's amazing that professors are allowed to enforce a political agenda through grading policies. I am shocked to find that aggressive political strategies are allowed to be inflicted on the captive and paying audience of students. Education being used to more than literally "teach you a lesson."

This isn't liberalism, this isn't open-mindedness, this isn't anything but coercion.

[–]Darmok-on-the-Ocean 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I feel like English departments are the most SJW-infested. I studied history and it was pretty politically neutral. And even the SJWish stuff (like having to say CE and BCE instead of AD and BC) was handled pretty casually by the professors. None of this reeeeeeee bullshit.

EDIT: I saw this in my feed and assumed it was TumblrInAction. Just noticed it was MensRights, lol.

[–]KingRobotPrince 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like English departments are the most SJW-infested.

They have very, very little impact in the world. I guess everyone needs to feel like they are achieving something.

[–]metachor 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Saying BCE/CE instead of BC/AD has nothing to do with social justice. That's something that historians themselves have been trying to reform for decades because it doesn't make sense to refer to eras of historical events by way of reference to one particular culture's fiction.

[–]Youwokethewrongdog 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But yet the dates still stay the same.

[–]Darmok-on-the-Ocean 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whether you call it social justice is a matter of perspective. And to be fair you seem like a fairly typical Internet atheist so you're probably biased.

[–]diabeetusboy 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm my feminist professor will dock points for not using "inclusive language"

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

We will conclude this essay, by listing the points I have made.

That's not inclusive.

Why?

"We" doesn't include Women, LGBTQIALMNOP, and Otherkin.

It does include them.

You offended me with more use of noninclusive language! RAPE!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Is LGBT seriously now LGBTQIALMNOP? And does the OP part stand for Original Poster?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It is not, but as far as I know, the designations have gone further than my made up one.

Also, yes, OP is original poster.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Haha I was also implying that Original Poster's get lumped into it too.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/4chan:

OP is a Faggot

[–]Kalcipher 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Will probably get downvoted for this, 'cause politics, but whatever.

I'm mostly up to date on TT language I think. LGBTQ is usually considered all inclusive, because 'queer' is a catchall, but some people prefer LGBT+ because of the former word's historic usage as a slur. A longer abbreviation that's more exhaustive (arguably in both senses of the word, heh) is LGBTQIPA+, respectively lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex (somebody born with ambiguous genitals) pansexual and polysexual, asexual and aromantic, '+' for everything else.

Alternatively you can skip all this mess with the much more sensible 'GSM', short for gender and sexual minorities.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The more letters in your alphabet soup, the less seriously I take you. That goes for everything.

[–]Kalcipher 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The most common ones are LGBT and LGBTQ. Not all that many letters. As for "that goes for everything", I suspect that is an excuse. I think you're being ad hoc.

[–]zer0nix 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Take out to the fucking Dean, unless you're making it up like the vast majority of these reports.

Edit: take out to the Dean after passing her class.

[–]diabeetusboy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Private university, social justice is the schools. Mission statement. I done goofed.

[–]OryxsLoveChild 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The second she said that I would have let her know I'm reporting her to the Dean and then walked out.

[–]Termintaux -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've just had this happen on two term papers in my final year. Using "an author", or "an agent" as the noun in a general point and then "he" as the pronoun - as is the custom for assumed gender of words. Both teachers circled every use and wrote sexist. Worst mark I've ever had in an essay by far as well.

I'm sorry but "their" or "they" is strictly and technically plural. Good job language teachers.

[–]speedisavirus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry but their and they are not implicitly plural. There are perfectly grammatically correct sentences that use them in singular reference

[–]diabeetusboy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is even more retarded than I ever thought possible. My bad marks are usually uses of mankind instead of humankind. I would be livid if I was you.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Mankind is the fucking guy's name, how the hell are you supposed to refer to him? Fucking cactus jack?

[–]fickle_fuck 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gotta use a gender neutral name... Maybe Cactus Pat?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself? Basically, it's made up of two separate words — "mank" and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.

[–]hashtagwindbag 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's been a long time since I've seen such a Deep Thought.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/Iam14andthisisdeep

[–]EduBA 47 points48 points49 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

the NAU English department, as well as the Modern Language Association, are pushing for gender-neutral language, and all students must abide by this

It seems that Big Sister doesn't abide by the First Amendment.

[–]eskamobob1 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Enforcing specific vernacular for a course of study has nothing to do with the first amendment. If you were reading an engineering lab report and came across "long bendy pipe thing", even if it told you exactly what it was talking about, you would still expect that to loose points. Now that doesn't change how stupid this is, but it isn't a freedom of speech issue.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

However, if you were writing an engineering paper and used the proper terminology, you wouldn't expect to lose points because the teacher has an unrelated ideological reason to dislike that terminology.

[–]EduBA 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Some words connote ideology. "Electron" does not but "Proletariat" does. Universities should be neutral on those issues.

[–]philthrow123456 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't be so ignorant, "electron" has connotation to the patiarchy and all of western imperial science. You need to decolonize your mind, and start science all over from an African perspective!

[–]EduBA 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right, I'm a pinhead who never will grasp Newspeak!

[–]Mclovinn6 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This happened to me in English they said it was sexist

[–]Satansyngel 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

ask my students to respect the need for gender-neutral language

There is no "need" for such thing, just your stupid opinion, stop forcing it on your students

She proceeded to tell me that the NAU English department, as well as the Modern Language Association, are pushing for gender-neutral language, and all students must abide by this,”

Burn it with fire. Who the fuck is "the Modern Language Association" and who the fuck has given them authority to institute new speech!? Absolutely disgusting.

[–]iAMADisposableAcc 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you not familiar with the MLA? If you want to be published in an actual humanities journal, good luck getting by without knowing their standards.

[–]Satansyngel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I am not. Why does it exist?

[–]iAMADisposableAcc 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So that all humanities papers are written in one distinct style with an at least partially enforced objective voice. It just ensures uniformity between papers so that people who read them aren't bogged down with the personal idiosyncrasies of every author.

I don't agree with enforced gender neutrality, but it's obviously a good thing to have a uniform style guideline, which is why literally every academic stream follows one of them (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, Legal, etc.)

[–]aokusman 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I am an adult, a veteran going back to school in the fall. I'm a minority and will challenge every SJW infraction I come across.

[–]OutsideGroove 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Be careful. I am an adult student, hell, I am older them a lot of the teachers. I have learned that you are better off biting your tongue or using your smarts to confuse them as if you come out as against their belief or leaning to the right , your grades will suffer. I went from an A to speaking out about how skewed the data was on welfare cheating, to all of a sudden my work is C work, I had to bust my ass to get my grade back up to a B.

I do take great pleasure in the confusing them though. You can right something about an evil left topic and then toss in some conservative facts that can't be argued and then make it like they think the left thought of it so they agree and love your work. Small victories. I can't wait to graduate and if not so close to the end, I would probably just quit as I really have not learned anything I didn't already know or couldn't find just by Googling something.

[–]aokusman 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Let me add that I'm also a Muslim and an immigrant so I tick several of their "victim" boxes. I won't be quiet when someone spews obvious propaganda that I can clearly and factually challenge.

[–]redheadedalex 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

jimmies will be rustled. snowflakes will be triggered. I wish I could be in class with you!

[–]helloiisclay 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For what it's worth, I have had a lot of luck escalating things. Young students aren't willing to go over their professors' heads, but as an adult, I have no qualms about it. Teacher not working out? Go to department chair. That doesn't work? Go to dean level. That doesn't work? Go to President level. Still nothing? Go to accreditation boards, and other government agencies. The caveat to this is that you have to be "technically correct" (best correct) and make a valid and well thought out argument. Going with "professor is wrong and I'm right" isn't going to get anything. Going with "professor is wrong for reasons a)...b)...c)..." will get you the result you want.

If you're an adult student who is also on the GI Bill, it gives you a lot of unseen power as well. The GI Bill is a guaranteed money maker for schools, and the VA has the ability to pull funding. If a student is being discriminated against (points marked off for not using a "gender neutral" noun, when that noun is, in fact, gender neutral can be argued as discrimination.) Escalating to the VA rep at the school, then writing to the VA itself can get things moving. An email to the VA rep stating that you are being discriminated against, and why you feel you are, with the chain of department chair, dean, etc CC'd will get things moving extremely quickly.

All of this has to be done in order. Going straight to the president's office or emailing the VA rep cancels out anything you could have done because then it appears you are trying to blackmail the school, invalidating your concerns. It puts the school immediately in "legal defense" mode. Going through the proper steps of escalation gives the school time to correct the issue and work with you, before going over their head. Just make sure everything is documented through emails during the process.

[–]flyingfox12 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You may find many of the professors really dislike the SJW tone as well. Prof's are just people.

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude, you are there for a specific goal. It's safer for you to just play the game, rather than getting caught up in the bullshit. If you do get caught up in trying to buck a professor over this nonsense, you'll ultimately lose because they have the weight of the institution behind them. It's one thing if you are doing "A" work and the feminist professor won't grade you above a "B" because of sexism...fight that shit all the way to the university BoD. But 1 point off for doing what the sexist feminist professor said not to do is playing a fool's game.

Choose your battles, man...get in there, get the paper, and get out.

[–]CriminalMacabre 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

but mankind was thrown 9ft by the undertaker from the top of the cage in hell in a cell

[–]bishamuesmus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

18 feet bud. It's a day one can never forget. Thought they broke that man in half!

[–]Mumakata 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That man has a family!

[–]bishamuesmus 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly this will never not make me laugh.

[–]neuromancer1987 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is what I came here for.

[–]timeslider 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a George Sink commercial.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People are getting so sick of this shit that the backlash is going to move things in the opposite direction of what these people want.

[–]ridemooses 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do they still learn History or was that banned too?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I remember at first I was all for feminism and considered myself a feminist. Boy, has this movement gotten out of control ever since then. I went a full 180 after constantly seeing shit like this.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

when did you start? because feminism has been going after so-called "gendered" language for a long time now; see: "womyn"

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't it illegal for educators and people of the sort to instill their personal beliefs?

[–]Choreboy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't that be nice?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, aren't I just so proud of my university. This doesn't surprise me though, this place is full of Tumblr warriors and dyed-hair students wanting safe spaces from the world.

[–]serial_crusher 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why is the word "humanity" a better choice? Shouldn't we have to say hufemity or personity or something?

[–]Gambizzle 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And hertory... not history. :P

[–]TimothyDRiel 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

“After our first essay we were given a list of ‘do’s and don’ts’ based off of errors my professor found in our essays... she said we had to be sure to use ‘gender-neutral language,’” Jeffers told Campus Reform. “Included with this rule were several examples of what was and wasn’t okay to use. In one of these examples she stated that we could not use the word ‘mankind.’

Although I agree that this rule is dumb, the student was advised ahead of time that the points would be taken off in this circumstance. The student deserves to have the points removed.

As for the Teachers opinion that

‘mankind’ does not refer to all people, only males.

That statement is as absurd as saying "Feminism means everybody". If the argument is that the prefix is gender specific in the first case, then it must be the same in the second.

So, the teacher is dumb, but the student went out of their way to lose the points, so she should lose them.

[–]GilbertHamilton2 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

So, the teacher is dumb, but the student went out of their way to lose the points, so she should lose them.

Or, take this hit (in points) as an opportunity to point out how dumb the teacher is, hoping the teacher changes his/her tune.

[–]TimothyDRiel 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The teacher gave her that option:

I will respect your choice to leave your diction choices ‘as is’ and to make whatever political and linguistic statement you want to make by doing so,” the professor wrote.

[–]GilbertHamilton4 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

to make whatever political and linguistic statement you want to make by doing so,

Which is funny, because this is exactly what the professor is doing by having such silly rules/needs/attention-gathering nonsense in her class.

Professors should not be using students as political/linguistic statements.

[–]TimothyDRiel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think the class is actually BASED on political statements...

At the very least, the teacher believes, or was instructed to believe, that this was the case:

“I would be negligent, as a professor who is running a class about the human condition and the assumptions we make about being ‘human,’ if I did not also raise this issue of gendered language and ask my students to respect the need for gender-neutral language,” Scott explained. “The words we use matter very much, or else teachers would not be making an issue of this at all, and the MLA would not be making recommendations for gender-neutral language at the national level.”

It appears that the course curriculum is focused on exactly this type of thing:

In a class such as this, wherein the course goals, discussions, readings, and assignments are all focused on what makes us ‘human’ and the assumptions we make about such a concept, it is crucial that we also understand what our word choices mean a great deal and have consequences in terms of what we reveal about our assumptions about ourselves and others, and the world generally.

Again, I disagree with this professor and wouldn't continue to participate in this class If this were my situation, but it has been made abundantly clear to this student that this is the point of the class and the way it will be graded.

[–]GilbertHamilton0 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you, don't want to sound like I'm trolling. I appreciate your replies.

[–]TimothyDRiel 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I also have enjoyed yours. These types of discussions are how I learn and mold my own opinions.

[–]GilbertHamilton0 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep!

It would seem that joining that class and then bitching about it would be like going to school for diving and then complaining that you are afraid of water.

[–]TimothyDRiel 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha, Yes!

[–]EduBA 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Suppose I teach Physics and don't like Newton. I advise my students that Newton's Laws will be called Laws of Dynamics, else points will be taken.

Would you agree with the removal of points?

[–]TimothyDRiel 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the phrase "Laws of Dynamics" is also correct, then yes. You, as the teacher, have given me guidelines. I, if I wish to stay in your class, would benefit from doing so.

[–]JustaPonder 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

As for the Teachers opinion that

‘mankind’ does not refer to all people, only males.

That statement is as absurd as saying "Feminism means everybody".

So, really now, isn't this just both sides calling one another out on the same difference of opinion?

[–]TimothyDRiel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No this is the THIRD side pointing out that everyone is being ridiculous.

[–]JustaPonder 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No this is the THIRD side pointing out that everyone is being ridiculous.

I don't disagree.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

For those trying to write neutral papers out there; here is your list. God Speed. Is the word "God" gender neutral? http://www.writinghelp-central.com/gender-neutral.html

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How the fuck is "brewmaster" NOT gender-neutral?

[–]iAMADisposableAcc 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

... Did you not see the rest of them, including 'master's degree'?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

haha, as someone in grad school I didn't have time to scroll through them

[–]iAMADisposableAcc 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As someone in the last month of undergrad - I really should have learned by now.

[–]JustaPonder 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Master, meister, magister, and mister (Mr.) share language roots.

[–]Gambizzle 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“I would be negligent, as a professor who is running a class about the human condition and the assumptions we make about being ‘human,’ if I did not also raise this issue of gendered language and ask my students to respect the need for gender-neutral language,” Scott explained. “The words we use matter very much, or else teachers would not be making an issue of this at all, and the MLA would not be making recommendations for gender-neutral language at the national level.”

Scott then offered to let Jeffers revise the paper to earn additional points in five categories, including diction, but noted that she is under no obligation to do so.

Lol is this a real uni?!?!? What a farce, it sounds like a primary school.

[–]BurkeyTurger 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Alternate Title: "Student ignores guidelines for paper, loses points"

[–]Choreboy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

She didn't ignore the guidelines.

Mankind isn't a gendered word. "Man" didn't even mean "male" until about a thousand years ago, and the word mankind is much older than that.

Before that you had wermann (male human) and wifmann (female human). Wifmann eventually morphed into woman and wermann just dropped the wer. It was only retained for werewolf (man wolf).

[–]BurkeyTurger 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

From the article:

“After our first essay we were given a list of ‘do’s and don’ts’ based off of errors my professor found in our essays. Most of them make sense, just things like ‘make sure you’re numbering your pages’ and ‘cite in proper MLA format,’ but she said we had to be sure to use ‘gender-neutral language,’” Jeffers told Campus Reform. “Included with this rule were several examples of what was and wasn’t okay to use. In one of these examples she stated that we could not use the word ‘mankind.’ Instead, we should use ‘humankind.’ I thought this was absurd, and I wasn’t sure if she was serious.”

Jeffers decided to test the policy on her next paper by including two instances of the word “mankind,” and when the paper came back with the requisite points taken off, she requested a meeting with Scott.

[–]Choreboy -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I read the article. It's not a gendered word, so she didn't break the guidelines.

[–]BurkeyTurger 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

The professor literally said not to use mankind.

In one of these examples she stated that we could not use the word ‘mankind.’ Instead, we should use ‘humankind.’ I thought this was absurd, and I wasn’t sure if she was serious.”

[–]Choreboy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

So the professor was wrong gave an incorrect example. Professors aren't infallible. The guidelines said don't use gendered words and she didn't, even if that was her intent.

[–]BurkeyTurger 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Or the professor accepts that the connotations and denotations of a word can shift over time and wants to use a more neutral word.

Saying that someone looks queer today means something very different than it did in the past.

[–]Choreboy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Sure that definitely can happen, but it hasn't happened. A vocal minority of SJWs don't just get to decide the meaning or connotation of a word has suddenly/recently changed. That requires time + a majority of the population using it in that context.

[–]BurkeyTurger 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Every shift does have to start somewhere though, at some point before the majority of the population is using it in a particular context a minority is.

[–]Choreboy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

True, but until the shift happens, it's wrong for the minority to use whatever power they have to punish someone else for not falling in line with what they want.

Skeet used to mean shooting a clay pigeon.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Choreboy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It really doesn't matter what words used to mean when it comes to communicating today

The meaning hasn't changed. It still refers to everybody. When have you ever heard someone say something like "one giant leap for mankind" and they meant only males?

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Choreboy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right on. Per one of my other comments, it also takes time + a majority of people using a word in a certain context for it to be accepted that the word is now different. A vocal minority can't just decide that suddenly a word means something different because they said so.

[–]Jethr0Paladin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alternative alternative title: "Professor proves that allowing women to become professors was a bad choice"

[–]twomillcities 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, because this has something to do with men's rights?? Wasn't it a woman who got her paper docked?

Keep your problems with gender pronouns on the kotaku / redpill / anti-sjw subs please. Let's talk about men's rights on this one.

Is it stupid that this happened? Yes. Should the teacher / school be publicly humiliated for it? Yes. Do we (MRA) need to fight back against gender neutral terms? No, because no one gives a fuck, and the people that claim to care have way too much time on their hands and not enough actual problems, much like the morons docking papers for not using gender neutral terms.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shut the fuck up

[–]ghastlyactions 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is gender neutral.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A dastardly display of penhumanship.

[–]Chromatoph 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn't even register that 'man' was in it. Dunno if that says something.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You used to pay to get an education at school, now you're just paying to be brainwashed

[–]rogue780 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's all learn the etymology of the word "mankind"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always thought the most sensible solution was to use as the default gender the gender of the author.

[–]Sqtrevives 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had the same thing happen to me in college. Same professor docked me a year later using a gender specific adage after he used it in class...some men/women just love to watch the world burn.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are schools enforcing "Latinx" too?

[–]CptFizz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://nau.edu/cal/english/directory/anne-scott/
You can find her contact information here. Give her a call or write her an email. She can't keep getting away with this. Home address can be googled in 10 seconds.

Rate her:
http://www.ratemyteachers.com/anne-scott/2565021-t
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1192199

Husband bit the dust in a freak accident http://azdailysun.com/news/local/freak-bike-crash-kills-professor/article_def8eb1a-d281-5405-bafe-de2727f9a3d2.html

[–]LarryLove 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Northern Arizona University. I rest my case

[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder how this teacher would handle a paper on Bangkok.

[–]Baconbitsthrowaway 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the type of thing you don't let go. Straight to the principal / dean / headmaster. The word is fucking gender neutral. There has to be a limit to the SJW crap.

[–]funkyguy09 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mankind noun 1. human beings considered collectively; the human race. "research for the benefit of all mankind" synonyms: the human race, man, humanity, human beings, humans, Homo sapiens, humankind, the human species, people, men and women

Ok let's go against all reason and logic and believe the complete opposite of how the dictionary defines a word because i have to be right because im a good little liberal!

[–]adamscus 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How nice teacher!

[–]speedisavirus 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking disgusting. It's a gender neutral term.

[–]AspiringGuru 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've long wondered how many of my english teachers docked marks because they disagreed with my writing on other than grammatical and storytelling issues.

[–]snoozeflu 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess from now on we are supposed to use "personkind" so we don't trigger or offend anyone.

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit, this is my school. I knew the liberal arts departments here were bad, but I didn't realize it was THIS bad.

Reminds me of one of my GEs here. Every paper I wrote for most the semester the professor loved, and I got over a hundred percent. I participated in class, and I generally just did fabulous; I also happened to agree with the professor in all those instances. We finally reach a new topic in which I disagree with the narrative the professor is pushing, and suddenly my "fantastic" writing, which was entirely unchanged, drops from an A+ to a C-, despite it being the same quality as always. I figured it was just an isolated case, but this is really too far. Thanks Empress Chang, I knew you'd find a way to make NAU worse than Hagar did.

[–]theDukesofSwagger 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The definition is: "all people thought of as one group"

How is that sexist?

[–]OnTheSlope 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

$100 says in under five years it'll be "student docked for using woman in English paper instead of womyn"

[–]ISOanexplanation 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure in 203 comments a few have already mentioned the offensiveness of hu-MAN-ity but I'm throwing it in just in case.

I suggest hupersonity. Just for the lumbering lack of euphony if nothing else.

[–]dukunt 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_(word) It is gender neutral

[–]CardMechanic -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shit, I read this and was imagining the kid told the story about Hell in a cell, and falling 16 stories through an announcers table.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HAhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahhhahahhahhahahahahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaa

[–]awtr50 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://peopleint.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/screenshot_37.png

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter