• Both are facsimiles of women.
  • Both have appendages that serve no reproductive function.
  • Both can fool a man’s naked eye.
  • Both can superficially look more feminine than some women.
  • Both can look superficially more attractive than some women.
  • Both have artificial vaginas for recreational sex.
  • Both in theory are a more accessible sexual alternative to some women.

If the above is correct then a post-op M2F transexual is effectively the closest real world example to a substitute sexual outlet for heterosexual men. And it's a foreshadowing of how the world will react to hyper realistic gynoids. Since both a robot and a post-op M2F are both sterile their fertility is irrelevant. In both cases sex is purely recreational.

Yet while most men will entertain the idea of masturbating with something like The Handy, a Tantaly or a Real Doll, it would be considered taboo to have recreational sex with a post-op M2F. But the only physical difference between the facsimile anatomy is that one uses human cells and one uses foreign materials (silicone).

I personally am open to having sex with a sex robot but not a post-op M2F transexual. And I’m not exactly sure why I'm open to one but not the other. Most men have a similar view. Yet they are both facsimiles. And by post-op M2F transexual I mean someone who can genuinely fool a man into thinking they’re a hot female, just google “thai lady boy”.

And for those who will make an insinuation, no I did not have sex with a transexual and I have no interest in doing so.