TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Pushing Kids Into Transgenderism Is Medical Malpractice

DougDante

September 23, 2016
1121 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/21/pushing-kids-transgenderism-medical-malpractice/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Pushing Kids Into Transgenderism Is Medical Malpractice
Author

DougDante

Upvotes 1121
Comments 215
Date September 23, 2016 3:32 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/542vhm/pushing_kids_into_transgenderism_is_medical/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/pushing-kids-into-transgenderism-is-medical.941120
https://theredarchive.com/post/941120
Top posts by DougDante

Father who beat man to death for raping his five year old daughter faces no charges in Texas: Fathers have a natural right to defend their children.

14016 upvotes
March 15, 2017
/r/MensRights

Penn State will pay $2.4 million for not disclosing crime statistics: They didn't consider boys raped on campus "real" rape victims.

7858 upvotes
March 19, 2017
/r/MensRights

I Changed "Men" to "Black People" in an Everyday Feminism Post, And Here's What Happened. It's unfair to feminist misandrists to decontextualize their hatred. It should be enjoyed in its original form.

6281 upvotes
November 24, 2016
/r/MensRights

'Game Of Thrones' Star Forced To Apologize For Saying Men Can Be Victims Of Sexism

5090 upvotes
November 3, 2017
/r/MensRights

College student who lied about getting raped begs to dodge jail

5088 upvotes
September 10, 2017
/r/MensRights

Court finally stops trying to make Detroit man pay child support for child that isn't his: Thank you attorney Cherika Harris, who took on this case with probably little personal financial reward

4365 upvotes
December 9, 2016
/r/MensRights

The demonisation of boys in our school system. This photo was taken by a young man in an Australian school.

3991 upvotes
October 20, 2016
/r/MensRights

Campaign to remove Clementine Ford as the speaker of a Lifeline event for tweeting 'Kill all men'

3799 upvotes
April 30, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (83 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]NapkinZhangy 45 points46 points47 points 9 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link

Med student here. The only time I've seen a doctor do anything gender-related on kids is if the kid was born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia or true hermaphroditism. And even then, the goal is to do karytyping, electrolyte testing, imaging, whatever tests you can do STAT to assign the kid a gender associated with the external genitalia that is most likely to be unnoticeable different if correctable.

Basically if the kid is a true hermaphrodite, you give the kid a gender based on whether a vagina or penis is more likely to be made without noticeable difference.

Of course that's only the "exam" answer and real life may differ a bit. However, I don't think any doctor would take a healthy child and transition them. That just sounds awful.

[–]pacmatt27 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

As an aside... What does STAT actually mean?

[–]Delixcroix 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Latin for instantly I believe. Roughly translates into. Do this binder of paperwork before the other binders.

Source: Am a Unit Clerk

[–]Phototoxin 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Statim - latin for immediately.

[–]pacmatt27 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ahh, fancy... What happens if you get more than one stat binder?

[–]Delixcroix 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then we do what is called Triage level order. Most life threatening stat orders are prioritised.

The Triage order is what is used in emergency departments too.

Respritory and heart failure tend to be highest priority. Then your going to see stuff like Gunshot wounds and cuts and burns the things that are painful that you don't die from. Then we tend to prioritise the sick usually most infectious to least. Lastly at the bottom you do comfort care such as Rashes and weird feelings in your tummy. and almost Satiricallly lowest is perscription refills. Don't go to emergency departments to refill your cholesterol meds.

Also you are gonna notice sometimes Doctors will put a stat on something because they want a lab result right away so bare minimum you need to look at every STAT doctors order. Even though some doctors just write every single one of their orders as STAT because they are impatient. Which is a dick move because it slows down how fast I can deal with life changing paperwork.

[–]pacmatt27 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks for the response! Interesting to know the risk hierarchy (I have to manage risk for my job but it's mental health, so rarely "This guy is about to die").

[–]Delixcroix 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like to think the more people that know about Triage order the less people that come to ER with a sore back knowing its not first come first serve and you won't be doing your back any favors sitting in a waiting room for 7 hours if the nurses and doctors have literrally anything else to do.

I jump around units but the only job I have done in mental health was a Staffing clerk position.... Which is almost entirely calling nurses to check their availability on days off.

[–]koomapotilas 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That is an awful way to treat hermaphrodite children. The idea of quickly assigning a gender based on the external characteristics is an idea heavily based on highly politicized and completely deprecated theories cobbled together about half a century ago. We have learned much, much more about the psychology of gender identity since those days.

It would be a much better policy to leave as much as possible of the original tissues intact until the child is old enough to decide which gender they wants to be.

[–]NapkinZhangy 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not saying it's the best way. It's the way things are done because it's considered a psychosocial emergency. Say you let the child wait. Do you think letting him have ambiguous genitalia for years is good for his mental health? What about the trauma of surgery when they can remember stuff?

It's a hard issue. For every person who wished the doctor left him/her alone until he/she was old enough to decide, there's a person who the doctor let decide who wishes that some procedure was done earlier due to the mental and physical stress of growing up with ambiguous genitalia.

I agree it's not perfect. It's just a case of being between a rock and a hard spot.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True hermaphrodites don't really exist in humans. There's lots of inbetween conditions, though.

[–]franklindeer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It happens more that you apparently are aware. It's increasingly common to prescribe hormone therapy or give puberty blocking drugs as a pre-surgery treatment. It's not millions of kids a year, but it's easily thousands and there are hundreds of documented cases in the media. It's definitely happening. Though I'd agree it's probably a small minority of doctors willing to involve themselves in this. But it only takes a small minority and people with resources in a private system will seek them out.

[–]SwiggityStag 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I had to turn 18 before they'd offer me anything. I'm 19 now and still waiting.

[–]Darin10 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good

[–]skywreckdemon 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm transgender, FTM. Puberty blockers are highly effective in giving children more time to know whether they truly are trans without making them go through their natural puberty (which can be extremely bad for a trans child's mental health). There are mostly no long term side effects to these medications. Children who show considerable levels of gender dysphoria should be given the option of delaying puberty.

That being said, pressuring or indoctrinating children into thinking that they are transgender is an absolutely awful thing to do. Let children be children and play with the toys they like and wear whatever they want. Medications should only get involved once a child's well-being is affected by dysphoria.

[–]franklindeer 74 points75 points76 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

That's not usually the purpose of these drugs (which are untested in children that age btw). The typical purpose is to block the physical changes that are caused by puberty until it's ethical to perform surgery. This is really limited to boys who will develop masculine features that aren't easily altered. It's got little to do with commitment, you just can't perform sex reassignment surgery on an 11 year old.

The problem with doing this, beyond the fact that the long term effects of these drugs are almost entirely unknown, is that gender identity disorder in children disappears on its own after puberty in 75% of boys and more than 80% of girls. Most GID in children is really just pre-pubescent confusion about sexual orientation. So giving them untested drugs that at minimum cause major interruptions to normal development when the vast majority have no need for them is IMO highly unethical and should be stopped altogether.

[–]scruffist 59 points60 points61 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Most GID in children is really just pre-pubescent confusion about sexual orientation.

More than that, it's just growing up. I hate that it's like this, but people seem absolutely unable to remember their own childhoods when they try to legislate the childhood of others. I remember hating the hair growing on my legs more than anything around age 12-13. I also felt terrible about having a high voice that then suddenly became one of the lowest voices in school choir. Everything was awkward and terrible. And it was all perfectly fucking normal. If you're 13 and you're not about to cry over the changes going on in your body, I'd say that's the kid with the mental problem. It's all perfectly normal and adults are pathologizing it. And to bring it back to MR, this will primarily affect boys, because our society already champions girls and denigrates boys. This is just another brick in that wall. I'm really worried about the suicide spike that might come from these mtf boys in 10-15 years who have stunted growth, health problems, mental problems, and physical deformities because of this social experiment.

[–]SigmundFloyd76 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

just another brick in that wall

"...Hey teacher.....leave those kids alone..."

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I know when I was like 6 I wanted to be a girl so bad. I'm 19 now and I definitely don't want that. I love being a dude (triggered right?) now I'm a hetero gun loving guy that watches sports and Im glad it's that way.

[–]BaronVonWasteland 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's very interesting. If you don't mind my asking, what were your reasons for wanting to be a girl at that age? And was there anything in particular that made those feelings go away?

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly because girls got treated so much nicer than boys. And it just went away lol I really don't kbow.

[–]Temperfuelmma 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it may be because of a child's attachment to its mother but our attachment probably shift from mother to father as we mature so in the place of wanting to desperately be just like the mother we shift to wanting to be like our father.

[–]geminia999 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If you're 13 and you're not about to cry over the changes going on in your body, I'd say that's the kid with the mental problem.

I don't remember ever really having any issues with puberty >_>

[–]Phototoxin 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was scared shitless because SRE basically told me I'd be a sex mad rapist.

[–]MagicTampon1 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

What's SRE?

[–]Phototoxin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex and relationships education. It gets called loads of different stuff - pshe - personal social and health ed or just health ed etc

[–]Imdabreast 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Me neither, but all my friends in public schools did. My sister took a knife from one of my buddies so he wouldn't kill himself. Guess we're crazy ;)

[–]Tarsen1 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same boat for me. Puberty as a guy was almost like a treat for me. It was all positive changes but I guess I was lucky. It is perfectly normal for each gender to envy the other because.. society. Hell I look at women and say "damn what life could have been like if I was a girl", but I am so happy that I was never influenced to change. The danger of all of this is making sex changes is that they are trying to alter the norm so that it is normal for kids to have sex changes. Just like every child now has a cell phone and this is just America now, we will see kids having Gender Picking Parties once they reach the age of medical consent.

The funny thing is that transgender advocates preach that doctors shouldn't be allowed to choose a gender for an infant because it is that human being's choice and their choice alone. But we have these parents trying to shove untested drugs and narratives into these kids, ultimately playing the role of the doctor. I haven't met a liberal that wasn't a hypocrite.

[–]7576576657 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At 13 you can tell whether or not you should kill youself based on how others respond to your hormonal changes.

Go figure someone making faces on the internet does well. It was never about intelligence...

[–]Samniss_Arandeen 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most of the people advocating this social experiment are anti-male, and project their disappointment and hatred of male characteristics onto boys going into puberty.

[–]Temperfuelmma 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's all perfectly normal and adults are pathologizing it.

No, multi million corporations that's got a lot of money to reap is pathologizing it.

[–]captain_craptain -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm really worried about the suicide spike that might come from these mtf boys in 10-15 years who have stunted growth, health problems, mental problems, and physical deformities because of this social experiment.

But isn't the Transgenderism a mental problem in and of itself? I get that more mental problems can result directly from it, but it also appears to be a mental problem on it own.

Edit: It so odd that someone would downvote a comment with an honest question to clarify, when it is painfully clear that transgenderism is a mental illness based on the fact that they are so deluded they think they are another sex when they are not. This is like downvoting someone for asking on clarification if the guy who thinks he is Superman or Jesus is suffering from a mental illness, or the person who mangles their arm to force a Dr to amputate it (Transabled, look it up) suffers from a mental illness. These are all essentially the same thing in that they are delusions suffered from someone who has had a break with reality/common sense/any kind of rational thought.

[–]MagicTampon1 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure. Maybe that just depends on how you look at it.

Certainly, before sex reassignment surgery was a possibility it was uniformly considered a psychiatric disorder. And probably for good reason.

If options change as time goes on, can that change how psychiatric disorder is defined?

I guess it can.

[–]captain_craptain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It still is a mental illness but no one wants to say it for fear of offending one of them or their army of SJW shills who will jump down your throat for suggesting these people are not mentally stable or even capable of rational thought on the subject.

If options change as time goes on, can that change how psychiatric disorder is defined?

No the condition remains a mental illness but the better options, like rebalancing brain chemistry that causes these delusions, will make their lives easier.

It is listed and defined in the mental health diagnostic materials the DSM-V etc, yet psychologists tiptoe around calling it a mental illness I think because it's become (forced really) so mainstream and so many cheerleaders out there today trying to normalize this bizzare and unhealthy behavior.

The shittiest part is they are indoctrinating this false normalcy in public school curriculum and now record number of adolescents are claiming they are transgender, getting the surgery and hormones, all while these feelings are normal for an adolescent and when the present typically go away for the vast majority of kids. The problem with that is that we've got sick Drs getting them surgeries and hormones, these kids will be a suicide epidemic years down the road when they find out they can never really go back to their true gender.

Innate gender cannot be changed, only representative gender which doesn't really mean shit. Your genes will still show you as your true gender no matter what you do to your body.

[–]blynng 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's not usually the purpose of these drugs (which are untested in children that age btw).

That's completely false. GnRH analogs are approved by the FDA and other governmental health organizations for conditions that require blocking puberty. They have undergone multiple year clinical trials and there are studies to attest to the safety and efficacy of these drugs.

The typical purpose is to block the physical changes that are caused by puberty until it's ethical to perform surgery.

No, the main purpose is to wait until the child can choose to consent to further hormone therapy.

[–]Tarsen1 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They have done these tests in the past decade or so. Watched the effects on prepubescent children and their progress for the next several years. That's great and all except there is no study that has any trials that follows the subject from age 10 to age 50 and see the effects of disabling puberty and how they are 40 years later. There is plenty enough evidence that points to health problems that has been created when a human delays healthy development during puberty. Mental disarray, chronic bone and joint issues, reduced muscular output, genital distinction, on and on. IMO it is tragic that there are parents that are forcing these gender assignments on their children to push their social narrative.

[–]blynng 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's useful for any drug to have long term studies. That doesn't mean the drug should not be used in the mean time.

There is plenty enough evidence that points to health problems that has been created when a human delays healthy development during puberty. Mental disarray, chronic bone and joint issues, reduced muscular output, genital distinction, on and on.

What evidence? All of the medical sources I've read say that delayed puberty is not harmful.

IMO it is tragic that there are parents that are forcing these gender assignments on their children to push their social narrative.

That's a huge distortion of reality. Parents aren't "forcing a gender assignment". They are letting gender non-conforming children express themselves as they wish and delaying puberty when there is an issue of physical gender dysphoria.

[–]GurkleGurkle -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Theres definitely a lot of parents that want a trendy kid.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem with doing this, beyond the fact that the long term effects of these drugs are almost entirely unknown, is that gender identity disorder in children disappears on its own after puberty in 75% of boys and more than 80% of girls.

Wrong. The tl;dr version is that the study counts all children who dropped out of the study as desisting. If you don't immediately see what is wrong with that, imagine if a study of a new cancer treatment had 50% of participants drop out of the study. Now imagine that instead of just adjusting the numbers to not count them as part of the final tally the study counts every one of those people who dropped out as having had successful treatments. It is deceptive manipulation of the data, grossly negligent if accidental and extraordinarily unethical if done deliberately.

[–]stealth9799 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...gender identity disorder in children disappears on its own after puberty in 75% of boys and more than 80% of girls.

Can I get a source on that? Seems like great ammo to use against SJWs

[–]ruler_gurl 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it true that beginning hormone treatment before puberty gives more satisfactory results with less surgery needed?

It's absolutely true that less surgery is needed. If a trans man doesn't grow breasts he shouldn't require painful chest reconstruction surgery. If a trans woman doesn't grow a beard she can avoid 80 hours of toe curling painful electrolysis. If she doesn't grow a brow ridge due to testosterone she won't feel the need to seek out a $50K extremely invasive surgical procedure to literally reshape her skull. There are many other benefits like never having your voice drop.

satisfactory results is a largely subjective assessment based on the fact that people who start younger are more difficult to identify as having a transgender history. If one thinks being transgender is undesirable then the results can be termed more satisfactory. What is less subjective is that due to society's long standing tradition of stigmatizing transgender people, then not appearing transgender can easily be argued to be the path of least resistance.

There is almost nothing on the other side of this that makes it sound like a bad idea to administer blockers. If a child desists, then the blockers are removed and they go through their normally scheduled puberty. In the worst case scenario they might need to take same sex hormones for a short while to jump start their own production. Blockers have been used for decades for other indications besides a transgender condition which is an off label usage. No one argued they were a problem until they were used for transgender care.

Cross hormone therapy never happens prior to 16, and in the US surgery never happens (or hasn't happened) prior to 18.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm neither TG or a doctor, but I work in health care in the Bronx and we have a lot of transgender MTF.

There are a lot of them that will never, ever pass as female. Money is a big reason - how much did Caitlin Jenner pay to cut her balls off? More than most of us could afford.

Blocking puberty and the effects of testosterone probably makes it much easier (cheaper) to transition later on, putting the ability to pass within reach of more people.

That's not what the article is really about though - it is about pushing an elective procedure on minors. This is already malpractice. More commonly pushed elective procedures are circumcision, tonsilectomies, appendectomies, eyelid modification (for Asians, almost every hot Asian you see had it done) and wisdom tooth extraction.

The most similar, though, in my opinion, are braces. They are much easier to do in adolescence, pretty much permanent and completely unnessecary. A lot of adults, myself included, have a problem with teeth grinding (bruxism) as adults because our teeth don't line up - there is not one stable way to clench our jaws, but two or more, and people slide their jaw between them, waring down their teeth. I will probably need a full set of crowns by 45.

If I had waited until 2016 to get braces, I would have the benefit of modern technology: invisible braces, computer modelling of the teeth, x rays and general collected knowledge. My teeth would probably be much better and I might not grind them.

I would also have to pay for them out of pocket. $5,000 that would be covered by my insurance if I was under 18.

Would I have been better off waiting to get braces? My natural teeth were pretty fucked. I had a natural overbite, but I played the clarinet, which pushed my two front teeth inward. Also, my teeth would be a lot better if I had one removed, creating space to line up the rest without impacting them. The orthodontist didn't do this - pulling a 14 year old's tooth for cosmetic reasons is pretty extreme. perhaps he should have, though.

How would waiting to have braces have affected my sex life, or my social life? Heck, even my ability to do well in a job interview?

I'm 28 now and I can't afford the $5k. How old would I be before I could afford it?

Tldr; can hormone therapy be malpractice? Absolutely. Always? I don't think so.

[–]franklindeer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tldr; can hormone therapy be malpractice? Absolutely. Always? I don't think so.

I disagree just because puberty itself resolves the vast majority of cases of GID in children. Which ones will be in that small percentage that continue to experience GID and might have benefited from early hormone treatment seems impossible to know.

[–]BlueDoorFour 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They are much easier to do in adolescence, pretty much permanent and completely unnessecary.

It's odd that you follow this up by a description of problems caused by misaligned teeth.

Though I agree that it can definitely make a difference to start HRT before puberty, I don't agree that orthodontics is a fair comparison. Say you get braces in middle school. First and foremost, you can give informed consent to it at that age. That is, someone can explain what it will do exactly and how it will benefit you. Worst case -- the orthodontist screws up and causes some problems. But that can happen at any age. Best case -- your teeth look better and have fewer problems when you're older. If it's done right, which it almost always is, then there's nothing to regret except maybe the expense.

For sex-reassignment, you're addressing a psychological condition with physical treatment. How do you properly diagnose gender dysphoria in a 9 year old? Best case scenario, you get it right and the child grows up passing as his/her gender. Worst case scenario, you fuck up a child's hormones and they grow up miserable with a bunch of other health problems.

I'd say it's definitely worth much more research.

[–]Murgie 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For sex-reassignment, you're addressing a psychological condition with physical treatment. How do you properly diagnose gender dysphoria in a 9 year old? Best case scenario, you get it right and the child grows up passing as his/her gender. Worst case scenario, you fuck up a child's hormones and they grow up miserable with a bunch of other health problems.

I'd say it's definitely worth much more research.

You know what? You're absolutely not wrong.

Dealing with a problem in which the practitioner's understanding of the patient's condition is almost entirely dependent on psychological symptoms being self-reported by a child? That's a risky business.
However, there are two factors which serve to severely limit the number of cases with negative results.

The first, as pointed out above, is that the overwhelming majority of doctors will never prescribe a child anywhere near as young as 9 hormone replacement therapy. Instead, they'll prescribe hormone suppressants, which delay the onset of natural puberty for as long as they're taken, and they'll wait until the child is old enough to make a more informed decision.

The second factor is actually the nature of gender dysphoria itself, as a neurological condition.

I don't really have the time to go into the current working theories on why this is the way it is, but what is currently known as concrete fact is that in a healthy neurotypical individual, the introduction of the opposite sexes sex hormones almost invariably results in symptoms very similar to depression.

If you or I, for example, were to begin to transition through HRT -even if we weren't aware of it- we would begin to experience depressive symptoms within a matter of months, though well before any permanent physical changes began to take place as a result.

Currently it's a matter of contention in the medical community if this is what gender dysphoria is, whether it's simply a component of it, or whether GD is a different thing altogether, but that's a bit of a tangent. My point is that, in patients who pass the psychological vetting which most doctors require before they'll consider prescribing HRT, this adverse reaction typically serves to clue them (or their doctor, who will immediately cease treatment if they're informed of it) in to the fact that gender dysphoria probably isn't their issue.

As a final note: actual sex reassignment is never preformed on children. I'm pretty sure you actually intended to refer to HRT, but just in case you didn't, here's a clarification. It's a procedure which simply can't safely be done until the patient has entirely finished growing (including the 'second puberty' brought about by HRT, which takes a matter of years, just like a natural one), because of the potential shifting of the skin that the grafts are attached to could jeopardize the structural integrity of the sculpted organ.

[–]BlueDoorFour 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for this response; I learned quite a bit. A few comments though:

. I'm pretty sure you actually intended to refer to HRT

I was using "sex-reassignment" as a shorthand for the entire process, to whatever extent it's taken. That first sentence wasn't referring to children specifically. I understand that nobody would dare perform SRS on a growing child.

My point is that, in patients who pass the psychological vetting which most doctors require before they'll consider prescribing HRT, this adverse reaction typically serves to clue them (or their doctor, who will immediately cease treatment if they're informed of it) in to the fact that gender dysphoria probably isn't their issue.

That's very interesting! I suppose it makes sense that you can see if the treatment's working before it has any lasting impacts, since it involves such a drastic change to the body. As long as there's a well-researched process of psychological vetting and the effects are closely monitored, I don't see the problem with giving HRT to trans youth.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a poor comparison as the health benefits and risks are massive in gender reassignment.

[+]oO0-__-0Oo -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The vast majority (over 90%) of "transgender" people never have any kind of genital surgery.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

This should be super illegal for a doctor

[–]TallTonyH 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they have lots of years of training and don't make these decisions lightly. More than a shooting from the hip comment.

[–]Matt_da_Penguin 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it's specifically an endocrinologist that would prescribe these meds. The child also has to go through psychiatric evaluations and get signed off from a psychiatrist, if not multiple. The laws may very by state, and iirc it's not exactly an easy process even for a transgender adult to get hormonal therapy today as there are more laws and regulations in place than there were in the past.

The application of training and ethics of any doctor will of course vary greatly, but what's new? My guess is most doctors don't want to carry the ethical burden of prescribing altering medication to any child without assurance that this is the right course, though you can't account for every one. It would be nice to see if this treatment provided more ultimately positive or negative experiences for those who were prescribed it.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Matt_da_Penguin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've heard some conflicting things on how easy/difficult it is to gain treatment, so that makes much more sense! Thank you! So are you in transition now then?

[–]franklindeer -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Puberty blocking drugs are actually designed to shrink the prostate in cancer patients pre surgery, they're totally untested in children as puberty blockers. So the idea that the medical community is being super cautious about this is total bullshit IMO. If this were any other treatment for something that wasn't an immediate threat to one's life there is no way they'd be so haphazard about it.

[–]Matt_da_Penguin 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

While the drug is not FDA approved, it was first prescribed in this way 2007, and has been recommended by endocrinologists since 2009. The drug itself has been in use for 30 years. It's also recommended that a patient undergo a full year of psychological therapy to rule out the possibility that this is a phase as best they can. Can we say for certain that there's been no testing or that the side effects are unknown? Furthermore, there are also risks associated with growing up transgender without options to consider and weigh including higher rates of violence, murder, and suicide as well as other psychological harms. Some of this is unavoidable, but this is a situation that really has to come down to the judgement of the parents, children, doctors, and psychologist in these situations on a case by case basis. Gender is not an easy field of study as of yet, and as of now there very few options available for anyone experiencing this.

[–]blynng 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

While the drug is not FDA approved, it was first prescribed in this way 2007, and has been recommended by endocrinologists since 2009.

Which drug? There are many ways to block puberty. Leupron Depot-Ped was made to prevent precocious puberty and was approved in 1993. The active ingredient was used since 1985.

[–]Matt_da_Penguin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I mispoke and should've been clearer. As I understand it the use of GnHR analogues for this purpose has not been not been approved by the FDA. Though they have been in use for other treatments for quite some time.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The person who cut the penis off a young boy and forced them to transition to female before they committed suicide was a trained doctor.

[–]twishart -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Source? I've heard of this (likely on reddit), never researched it.

[–]BlueDoorFour 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Probably referring to the David Reimer case, though I don't remember offhand if he committed suicide.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The kid did.

[–]kireol 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

well, the parent. The doctor wouldn't do this without an adult signing off without big liability.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Even then, it is unethical to do such experiments to a minor.

We have no idea what kind of damage these drugs do long term.

Also, the potential for abuse is much too large. There will be much more harm done overall by parents pushing for this, than by the tiny minority of children it might actually help.

In fact, there is no evidence that it will actually help anyone. Even complete sex changes are not shown to be very effective. The suicide rate afterwards is abysmal.

[–]blynng 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even complete sex changes are not shown to be very effective. The suicide rate afterwards is abysmal.

In fact, gender confirming medical procedures are very effective. There is overwhelming evidence that sex reassignment surgery improves a transgender person's wellbeing.

The "fact" that SRS is not helpful comes from a misreading of handful of papers that deal with lifetime rates (rather than comparing pre- and post-operation) and from studies that compare transgender people to the general population.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

None of it is really very well understood at all.

There is such a tiny minority of people that legitimately have this problem, there is a very tiny base for research.

Science really doesn't know yet what's really up, if nature or nurture.

In either case, such extreme alterations in chemistry, as well as physical mods, potentially create much larger problems than they are trying to fix.

On topic: The child cannot realistically consent to such extreme (and still experimental) treatments any more than they can to elective surgery. To force it on them is unethical and inhumane.

[–]monty93 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The physical damage aren't even that important, they are been changed (or forbidden to naturally change in this case) against their will just becase the parents think the child is potentially transgender. Think about psycological damage just for being different to everybody else. An ethical doctor mustn't allow that.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yah, that alone is reason enough.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it should be illegal for the doctor. The exception should be court approved emancipation.

If you can be legally proven to be an adult, then you can consent to biological altering medical treatment.

[–]Murgie 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not trans myself, but over the years I've been inspired by a friend who is to learn a fair bit about the medical and biological aspects of transgenderism.

From what I know, I can tell you unequivocally that the use of hormone suppressants in minors who believe themselves to suffer from gender dysphoria is far more than a potential; these days it's standard practice in such cases.

The international standard on these matters, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, is called the Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People, or WPATH-SOC. In past versions of the WPATH-SOC, minors in this situation typically didn't even receive suppressants, and hormone replacement therapy was completely out of the question.

Alright, I've said my bit about frequency, now let's answer your actual question:

Absolutely, without any question whatsoever. If a patient does not experience puberty as their biological sex, they will be virtually indistinguishable from any other member of their transitioned sex once they have undergone hormone replacement therapy, barring an examination of their genitals. Sex hormones genuinely are that powerful, they're just short of being the end-all be-all in determining male or female phenotype expression.

Personally, what really drove home just how powerful the hormones alone are in the expression of sexual characteristics was reading up on androgen insensitivity syndrome. Specifically, complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.
If a person's body doesn't ever receive (or is totally insensitive to) androgens (male sex hormones, the counterpart to estrogens), they will physically develop as a woman outright, right down to the genitalia. The only physical difference is the lack of the strictly reproductive organs (ovaries, uterus, fallopian tubes, etc), and the fact that they're 100% XY on a genetic level, though are often entirely unaware of it theirself.

[–]MarcieMarie12 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, they only use puberty blockers at the onset of puberty. They will not start hormones until they are age 16 or 18. If the kid decides that this was not right for them, they can stop and normal puberty begins. This helps avoid development of unwanted secondary sex characteristics (facial hair for male to female, breasts for female to male for example).

BTW-the author of the article is an anti-trans activist and thinks everyone is making the same mistake he did. Are there regrets, sure, but they are an extreme minority of cases. Usually because they weren't honest with themselves or their therapists/doctors. It is so full of factual errors, and of course shows a couple of Drag queens for shock value instead of what transgender people really look like.

Here is a well known transgender actress (Laverna Cox) and actor (Buck Angel):

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiz9_Wu36XPAhUGdj4KHYRwA7kQjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwebapp2.wright.edu%2Fweb1%2Fnewsroom%2F2014%2F11%2F25%2Ftv-star-transgender-advocate-laverne-cox-to-give-presidential-lecture-at-wright-state%2F&psig=AFQjCNFixLCv6Np_CcOoQ5vfci6FwlOFVQ&ust=1474728874561496

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjdiKTX36XPAhUIOz4KHaICBF8QjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.com%2Fpin%2F405746247659354535%2F&psig=AFQjCNHVrpsgj5a3MyVtuPWv3i4Iu2XHGg&ust=1474728963256649

[–]Kafke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Trans here.

Is it true that beginning hormone treatment before puberty gives more satisfactory results with less surgery needed?

That's definitely true. Hormones have some permanent changes (voice drop, for guys, as an example or breast growth for girls) that you have to take care of if you've already gone through puberty. Teens/kids have it good since, for instance, trans girls who transition before puberty don't have to train their voice or get vocal surgery.

That's why puberty blockers are great. They just delay puberty so that people who aren't sure have some more time to figure it out. Or they can delay it until they're 18 if their parents aren't okay with it.

[–]carbonnanotube 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The changes from hormones aren't just physical though.

How can you make an informed decision if you haven't let your mind develop along its natural path?

[–]Kafke 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because gender identity is formed before the age of 8? It's not exactly something that changes at certain ages.

To run some numbers: 100% of people who have gender dysphoria but are untreated remain having gender dysphoria both before and after puberty. In people who are diagnosed before puberty, often times dysphoria worsens. 80-90% of transitioners are satisfied with their transition. Rates of regret are below 1% and are only a few cases, and are mostly those which did not report gender dysphoria, nor a strong desire to physically be the opposite sex.

There's not really a case for "what if they choose wrong?". The reality is that anyone who's seeking medical help is almost certainly trans. For minors who may still be questioning whether transition is right for them, there's puberty blockers as mentioned. On top of all that, regret and detransitioning happens within the first few months of hormones, once gender dysphoria sets in for those who aren't actually trans. Which is well before any permanent changes take effect.


And to flip it on it's head: You're essentially saying: "let's force kids to take hormones they don't want, because how can they really be sure they don't want them?" That's fucked up, right?

[–]sillymod[M] [score hidden] 9 years ago stickied comment (6 children) | Copy Link

As always, controversial issues get heavily reported.

I want to remind people that the PRESENCE OF IDEAS YOU DISAGREE WITH IS NOT A VALID REASON TO REMOVE THOSE IDEAS FROM YOUR PRESENCE.

You can remove them if you don't want to see them by clicking the HIDE link.

But controversial issues need to be discussed, and if you disagree with a perspective THEN YOUR VOICE MATTERS.

Convince people that they are wrong for believing a certain way, rather than try to silence them.

[–]stealth9799 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

When do these retarders learn. It seems like every controversial post gets this exact comment from a mod.

Reporting does nothing but make you look like a dumbass

[–]prodiver 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm offended by the word "retard."

You've been reported.

[–]CaptainRandus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm offended by the word "reported". Have a tea

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Have a tea

Did you just assume my nationality?

[–]CaptainRandus 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you offended by Nationality?

[–]TejrnarG 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hear hear! I wish everyone would think like you! Well spoken!

[–]Underwater_Karma 25 points26 points27 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems like we're being told "genitals don't define you" and simultaneously "genitals so thoroughly define you that surgery is the only answer".

[–]PyroSpark 83 points84 points85 points 9 years ago* (31 children) | Copy Link

Okay are they really "pushing" the thought that kids might be trans, or just teaching them about it?...

[–]BCSteve 50 points51 points52 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. This is the exact same thing as when people claim that schools are "indoctrinating children into homosexuality" simply because they're teaching them that gay people are (gasp) normal.

No one is "pushing" kids to be trans, just like no one is "pushing" them to be gay. It's just transphobic "think of the children!" BS and it's a shame it's been upvoted as much as it has.

[–]PavementBlues 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I have to say, as an egalitarian trans woman who has seen up front a lot of the issues that the men's rights movement is trying to address and is sympathetic to the cause, I'm really proud to read the discussion happening in this thread.

Nornally when this topic pops up on the non-trans subs, it devolves into baseless speculation and insults. This might be the best discussion of trans issues I've ever seen outside of our little bubble.

Thank you. It means a lot more than you realize.

[–]MotherFuckin-Oedipus 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

it devolves into baseless speculation and insults

People are afraid of what they don't understand. It's just a defense mechanism; not that I support it in any way. The key to preventing that is to educate them.

[–]PavementBlues 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's where much of the trans community struggles. The process of realizing that you're trans and coming to accept yourself and transitioning and dealing with the fallout and trying to piece your life back together despite experiencing so much hatred from so many sources is incredibly hard, and it leaves a lot of us either exhausted and frustrated or outright bitter and angry. So we see those conversations going off a cliff and we react emotionally. We vent. We get upset at the person, because they represent this amorphous entity that makes our life far more difficult than it needs to be.

It's not constructive, which is why I try to go out of my way to help calmly and respectfully educate when I see those kinds of comments on reddit. Doing so can be difficult at times, but it is the only way that we can make things better. Yelling at and shaming others only polarizes people. We need to reach out and start a conversation, not shut it down.

[–]Nergaal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

"The state’s [WA] health education glossary defines gender as “A social construct based on emotional, behavioral, and cultural characteristics attached to a person’s assigned biological sex.” Gender expression, meanwhile, is defined as “The way someone outwardly expresses their gender.”"

[–]PavementBlues 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I still don't get why the queer community has fought so hard to convince people that gender is a social construct, and for the life of me I can't figure out how ANY trans person can get behind the idea.

I've summed up some of the current research here and here, but a growing body of evidence indicates specific volumetric differences between men and women in certain regions of the brain, as well as certain patterns of activation in places like the hypothalamus that have been found to be completely independent of and unable to be influenced by any kind of training or conditioning. In trans people, it is often noted that the size and/or activation patterns of these areas match more closely the identified gender than the natal gender.

Gender roles are a social construct. Unfortunately, there is so much bickering about definitions in our own community that it muddies the waters and makes progress difficult.

[–]Nergaal -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My point is that the state of WA has this definition as part of its K12 teaching standard: http://www.k12.wa.us/HealthFitness/Standards/HPE-Standards.pdf

To me this implies that gender is a social construct is part of the curriculum that they are teaching there. They are already messing with the kid's minds.

[–]PavementBlues 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I looked deeper into it, and they seem to be using "gender" as a strange combination of gender expression, gender identity, and gender roles. Their definitions of each of the three components seem pretty solid, though the idea of combining them doesn't make sense to me and I agree that it's not appropriate.

That being said, I actually looked farther into the curriculum to see what this is all about. Here is their outline:

  • Kindergarten: Understand there are many ways to express gender.
  • Grade 1: Explain that there are many ways to express gender.
  • Grade 2: Understand that there are a range of gender roles and expression. Understand the importance of treating others with respect regarding gender expression.
  • Grade 3: Explain that gender roles can vary considerably. Understand importance of treating others with respect regarding gender identity.
  • Grade 4: Identify how friends and family can influence ideas regarding gender roles, identity, and expression. Demonstrate ways to show respect for all people.
  • Grade 5: Describe how media, society, and culture can influence ideas regarding gender roles, identity, and expression. Promote ways to show respect for all people. Identify trusted adults to ask questions about gender identity and sexual orientation.

This doesn't seem like messing with kids' minds to me. The focus appears to be on recognizing that this is a part of some people's experience and teaching kids to respect that it's not wrong or bad. Having experienced the deep-seated discomfort that so many people (even allies) have with transgender people, I appreciate that they're trying to teach a new generation to live and let live.

Also, this stuff would have been great to hear as a kid myself, since I might have been able to avoid fifteen years of shame and self-hatred that prevented me from acknowledging the problem until my late-twenties. That's pretty common with trans folk, because we're raised early on without any context for understanding how we're feeling and repress it so that we can be like everyone else.

As I said, though, I agree that their definition of gender itself is bad and I would be curious to see how this outline is taught in practice.

[–]Nergaal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I have absolutely no idea what your experiences have been. However, starting kids' education with a definition of a gender that has been scientifically shown repeatedly to be wrong should make anybody that is honest feel very uncomfortable. And I don't mean that in a let's-break-barriers way.

Most people don't bother to go beyond what they are being fed in the classroom. So teaching something that reads more like an agenda than an misguided let's-all-hold-hands attitude cannot possibly end up with good results for the society.

[–]PavementBlues 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you, and I think where we see things differently is that since their definitions of the three sub-components of gender are solid and scientifically validated, and since the curriculum itself references only those in each lesson plan, I remain on the fence and curious as to how it's actually taught. If the general definition of gender is used, I would absolutely challenge it.

[–]OneWayFuck 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. Just like we keep church and religion out of public schools we need to keep politics out as well. We are sending our children to school to learn history, maths and english. Leave the parenting to the parents.

[–]youwontguessthisname 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not so much transphobic...as it is surprising. Transexuals are rare in the grand scheme of things. As in ~0.3% of the population rare.

[–]purpleblossom 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There have been some instances (and usually ones that make the news) where parents assume their child is transgender because they are gender nonconforming and happen to lean more towards things typical of the opposite gender without actually saying anything OR if the kid (usually an only child) does say they are the opposide gender, they immediately go to doesn't to have start transition but most of those in the last 5-10 years aren't heard from again because 1) the kid was GNC or 2) the kid wasn't trans.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes we call them "Tom Boys"

[–]purpleblossom 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tom boy is a term for girls, what do you call a gender nonconforming boy? My comment is referring to how it's mostly boys being treated this way even though some girls are as well.

[–]Nergaal 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Part of the curriculum is to teach them that "gender is a social construct". What do you think that means?

[–]PyroSpark -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I highly doubt that's part of ANY curriculum. That's not even a thought, outside of batshit tumblr folk afaik.

[–]Nergaal 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Until 30 mins ago thought the same. Check page 49 on the WA State Learning Standard in the glossary:

http://www.k12.wa.us/HealthFitness/Standards/HPE-Standards.pdf

[–]PyroSpark -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Okay, it states it as a social construct in the actual definition, BUT making that a point of the curriculum doesn't seem to be a major part. The majority of gender studies in that file, seems to be about basically saying "you can do whatever you want and still be a guy/girl."

But you're right that it does say that. Just gotta hope for the best it seems.

[–]Nergaal 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is all funny tumblr shiet until it becomes reality...

[–]guy_guyerson -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

What do you mean by trans? Whenever this issue comes up people seem to want to jump between diagnosed cases of gender dysphoria and self diagnosed cases of 'feeling like a girl' and pretend as though they're both equally valid.

I'm no saying you've done this, but your context prompts me to ask.

Rates of gender dysphoria are about 1 in 65,000. Why would we spend class time 'teaching them about it' and not, say, OCD/schizophrenia/pica/take you pick?

If, on the other hand, you're referring to 'cases' of transgenderism in the absence of gender dysphoria (or similar and even more rare conditions), then even acting as though it's a legitimate phenomena is pretty controversial. It becomes a case of 'teaching the controversy'.

Gender naturally occurs along a spectrum. Some men more strongly embody statistically masculine characteristics. Some men naturally demonstrate statistically feminine characteristics. That doesn't make them women. They have XY chromosomes. Vice versa for women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You're mixing up gender and sex. Yes, gender is a spectrum and yes, chromosomes makes up your biological sex, but those two things are unrelated. (And as a side note, what of those people without xx or xy? Are they nonexistent?)

[–]guy_guyerson -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I am not. You're mistaking your preference in usage as being absolute definitions. Even the Oxford English (which I believe is a more prestigious source than the one I linked) refers to the distinction you're making as one of typical usage, not definition.

Gender and sex are often taken as synonyms unless clearly stated to be used distinctly at the time.

Are they nonexistent?

No, they're sufferers of "similar and even more rare conditions".

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ah, I think I've found the issue here. You're using a dictionary. Dictionaries do not do what you think they do. It appears that you believe that a dictionary (Merriam-Webster and Oxford included) are the definitive authority on words and their correct meaning. That is not the case. Dictionaries define words as the public believes them to be defined. That's why you'll find words like pwn, bromance, etc. in the dictionary, including your prestigious Oxford English Dictionary. For the actual meaning of specific words, you should refer to other sources. Take the World Health Organization (WHO) for example. The WHO, a specialized agency of the United Nations focused on international public health, defines sex and gender pretty much the same way I did, as would most credible, medical professionals.

[–]guy_guyerson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It appears that you believe that a dictionary (Merriam-Webster and Oxford included) are the definitive authority on words and their correct meaning.

Not definitive, no such thing exists, but objective and well researched enough to be relied upon for casual conversation. My usage was fine, my meaning unambiguous (you correctly understood it, after all). But you saw the opportunity to pretend I was objectively wrong and took it. Well done.

You could find highly specialized working definitions for just about anything if you poured through every technical field that uses them and then critique common usage, but why would you?

Dictionaries define words as the public believes them to be defined

Yeah, living language and all.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

From a medical standpoint, your definition of the words sex and gender are objectively wrong. We're taking about medical and psychological issues here, I don't believe casual definitions have any weight in these kinds of conversations.

[–]guy_guyerson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It remains unclear if those issues are, indeed, being discussed. There has been very little distinction about whether these cases of transgenderism cross into the clinical realm or are merely children being children.

Not for lack of trying on my part, mind you.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about this comment you made:

Gender naturally occurs along a spectrum. Some men more strongly embody statistically masculine characteristics. Some men naturally demonstrate statistically feminine characteristics. That doesn't make them women. They have XY chromosomes. Vice versa for women.

That was comment about trans in general, was it not?

[–]guy_guyerson 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The only liberty I'm taking here is using male/men and female/women interchangeably. I don't consider this comment to have been medical in nature so much as biological. I appreciate your precision with language, genuinely, though I disagree with your conclusions. However I won't be pursuing this further.

[–]moxiebaseball 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

There was a case of identical twin boys and one had a botched circumcision (also a men's rights issue) that mutilated his genitals. There was a doctor who felt it was the ideal experiment to test his theory that gender is learned. Needless to say the boy raised as a girl had real issues and eventually was able to live as the male he was but tragically ended up committing suicide. That's the most outrageous malpractice.

edit: for those curious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer Also truthfully gender dysphoria does exist with some kids and those individuals should have the right to appropriate treatment.

[–]PavementBlues 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Extremely sad story, particularly the sorts of abuse that he was subjected to in order to force him to develop a female gender identity.

The being said, it does support the idea that whatever physical body you inhabit, your gender identity can't just be switched like that.

Edit: Fair call-out that it's a lot more complicated than that in this situation. There are way too many confounding variables that could have led to his depression and suicide.

[–]moxiebaseball 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The truth is almost certainly more complicated than that. This case shows that what was done was horrible for this individual and also that conclusion driven science is at best unethical. Also not addressed at all in the discussion are things like androgen hyposensitivity, hermaphroditism, chimeras, etc.

[–]PavementBlues 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The truth almost always is. While I think that it supports the idea, I don't think that it's the strongest evidence in favor (modern neurobiological research offers much better and more interesting evidence), particularly due to how absolutely horrific the abuse that he sustained at the hands of his doctor was. It's sickening what they did to him.

The reason I bring it up in the first place is that I often see this case used as evidence against the idea of neurobiological gender identity, which doesn't really make sense to me.

[–]moxiebaseball 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right. My point is this particular case is pretty clear cut, however, it should not be used as evidence that there isn't clear gender dysphoria in other cases that merit treatment.

[–]purpleblossom 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel there is a big difference between pushing a kid into being trans and helping kids who, like myself, are trans into medically transitioning at the onset of puberty, never before of course.

For myself, I know I would have wanted to medically transition, even if that only meant hormone blockers at first, but not before puberty, and with those treatments even more accessible than when I was young, it's even more important to not let that accessibility blind anyone to thinking that it means those treatments need to be used. With my case, I was experiencing gender dysphoria before puberty because I knew what would happen, but that didn't mean I needed treatment until it actually happened.

To do these things to kids before they have reached puberty, the time in which is clearest on if said kid is or isn't trans, is wrong, and even then, should wait at least a year or so into puberty just to be sure.

[–]heimdahl81 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We have known changing genders leads to suicides from reports in the late 1970s that provide a telltale glimpse into the consequences of ignoring the science. Endocrinologist Dr. Charles Ihlenfeld warned about the suicides and unhappiness of transgender clients based on his experience treating more than 500 transgender patients with hormones over a six-year period at colleague Dr. Harry Benjamin’s gender clinic.

The author is confusing cause and effect here. Suicide rates for transgender people are higher when they are not allowed to transition than when they are. In either case it is higher than the baseline population rates, but the former is definitively worse.

But really put yourself in their shoes for a minute. Imagine your brain is screaming at you that your body is wrong. Modern medicine and psychotherapy cannot change this fact. There is no treatment for the brain, only the body. So you take hormones and get surgeries trying to make your body match the way your brain feels it should. Trying to reach what feels normal to you. Maybe you make it after years of trying and you can finally feel content just being in your own body. Then again maybe you don't "pass" well enough and you have people constantly reminding you that you are a failure at being the gender your brain tells you to be. Maybe you lose hope that you ever will and decide a lifetime of living in the wrong body is too much and decide to end it.

Getting a doctor to agree to transitioning isn't easy, especially with younger people. It takes a lot of therapy sessions to narrow down the problem and get the doctor to agree to a solution. Some people lie to themselves and their doctors and take this path when it is not right for them, but that is the minority. Past sexual abuse in particular complicates things as this can cause serious body issues and intense discomfort surrounding your sexuality. It should be no secret that this country desperately needs a better mental healthcare system and some people transitioning when it is not the best for them is a symptom of this. For most though, it is the option that does the least harm.

[–]blkarcher77 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Remember that time where they did a social experiment, and raised a boy as a girl, and then he later blew his goddamn brains out?

Good times

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't this go both ways, not just men?

[–]themattpete3 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I hate that there are people out there that think their genitals decide who they are. Fuck anyone who tells insecure people that they need to take drugs and cut their wiener off to "fix" a body that is "wrong" for them.

[–]skywreckdemon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. However, transgender people aren't insecure (some are, of course, but not all). Kids shouldn't be pressured into thinking that they are transgender but those that truly are deserve treatment.

[–]Trash_Golem 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know this is kind of a fringe piece, but it does give you a look into the other side of the trans rights issue. At this point, if I were a doctor, I'd be tempted to just turn away young transgendered patients. It seems like a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" type situation.

Give out hormones or perform surgeries, and I'm doing unneeded, permanently damaging work while enabling a false political movement. Don't do it, and I'm cruelly turning away somebody with a legitimate medical need out of personal bigotry.

I really respect doctors, not only for their expertise, but also for having to regularly make and live with these types of decisions. They often seem to find themselves at the focal point of our society's most divisive and nasty issues.

[–]ruler_gurl 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

If it's such a problem why aren't there small armies of disaffected, angry, ex-transgender people out there locking arms with Walt Heyer against the transgender medical complex? Instead it's just this sad sack who is still unable to fess up to the fact that he shortchanged himself by failing to be honest with his Drs so that they would have addressed his other undiagnosed mental problems. No one is pushing people into transition. If anything the opposite is typically true.

The first medically assisted transition in the US was 1952 and many thousands have walked down the same road as this guy. If his dire predictions had a grain of truth behind them, then he'd have a lot more company on his bully pulpit. Where are they?

[–]bioemerl -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

It takes years for the results of abusive teaching to render in the population.

It will be silent as the people who were pushed into these situations kill themselves or live lives of depression because their educators didn't take basic precaution and used politics to determine how kids should act.

[–]ruler_gurl 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

politics to determine how kids should act.

Instead we should use "tradition" and bigotry to teach transgender kids to hate what they are and either begrudgingly conform, or jump out into traffic? Sorry but we've tried it that way. We tried it that way for a long, long time.

No one is teaching kids to be transgender. It's a truly foolish thing to imagine. At best there is a movement afoot to allow kids the room to act on their feelings and if those feelings consistently persist, literally for years, then they can get access to medical care. Denying them that opportunity is the true act of cruelty. I wonder how proud and happy this child's parents are at having denied appropriate care?

[–]bioemerl -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

No, we should rely on study and fact to determine how and when to teach kids about gender identity.

to teach transgender kids

That's the point, half of these "transgender" kids aren't transgender, they are delusional, autistic, or have faced some form of abuse that, combined with this "escape" they attributed their constant sadness to and use to call themselves transgender.

Then, the actual problem goes unfixed, the person transitions.

After some time, they finally realize what's going on in their life, fix the real issue, and now they really are trans, all thanks to contributors like you!

[–]ruler_gurl 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

You're making up a slippery slope argument based on your feelings with zero supportive evidence. The whole point of getting people into therapy is to help separate out persisters from desisters. You are grossly misinformed if you believe that some evil doctors are out there trying to convince kids they are trangender. It's conspiracy theory of the highest order.

[–]bioemerl -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

Where's the slippery slope? I'm not arguing that X is here so Y will happen.

I'm arguing that if you teach kids, before they have reached an age of appropriate maturity to understand what they feel about themselves on a good level, they will pick up the things you teach them about and attribute those to the way they feel.

In this case, any kid who is sad or depressed, has issues from any source, and falls along the opposite "end" of the spectrum of being masculine or feminine may begin to blame their sadness on body disphoria.

Once you do that, it reinforces itself, much like the way you learn to be angry at people disrespecting the flag, or going against the political topics of right and wrong you are taught as a kid. Their sadness becomes a thought of revulsion when they look at themselves, self condifence issues, and all sorts of other things, because they were told that these were symptoms not because they naturally have them.

The human mind is a powerful explaining tool, and it will explain using the facts it is given. Giving kids without understanding of the world lessons on how "you might be trans" will cause them to use incorrect facts and judgement, and that will go badly in the long run.

I'll give you a broad/personal example. I'm about to leave college, and even today I do not understand what it means to feel lonely. I've never felt it. It took until middle school for me to learn what it meant to feel nervous because I was getting chills before I had to go to a boy scouts camp the next day.

Do you think I would be equipped to make judgement on if I were or were not trans when I didn't even understand what it meant to feel nervous or lonely? Do you really think it's a good idea to go and ask kids to judge their own identity when we can't even trust them to walk down a street while alone?

Kids who show signs of being trans should be told ONLY after they naturally show those signs, not before. Secondly, they should only be informed by people who are not biased, and really do have honest intent for the good of the person they are talking to rather than some idea of fairness of representing "the idea of trans people being represented" in schools.

You have no idea how greatly you can twist and bend people's minds into thinking and behaving certain ways, do you? There are people out there who have convinced others that they were cannibals, abusing their kids, abused by their parents, and all other sorts of things along those lines. This isn't a nice little innocent thing where all you can do with your words is inform others, you can actively change who they are and the way they think even if you do not intend to.

The whole point of getting people into therapy is to help

I do not care what the intent is, I care about the results. All great evil actions have come from good intents.

You are grossly misinformed if you believe that some evil doctors are out there trying to convince kids they are trangender.

I did not say this.

[–]ruler_gurl 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm arguing that if you teach kids,

Who in the world do you imagine is teaching kids they are transgender? It's a completely unsupportable assertion. Allowing people the room to express their gender in a judgement free environment is not teaching them to do it. It's only teaching them that it's not wrong to do it so that they won't end up being repressive and self loathing to the point that they self harm.

I'm not arguing that X is here so Y will happen.

That's literally all you've done. You've argued that there are no transgender young (which is ludicrous if you talk to adults who knew from a very young age) You've argued that they all just have other problems (which is false, only some do) You've argued that if you give them the room to consider whether they are transgender then their other issue will go untreated and they will be convinced they are transgender instead (this is provably false because kids desist at published rates. At the same time the regret rate among those that don't desist is very low).

[–]bioemerl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Who in the world do you imagine is teaching kids they are transgender

Teachers in elementary schools, according to the article?

Secondly, you don't need to teach them that they are trans, only that "if you feel sad about your body, or feel like a boy/girl, you might be trans" which is what young kids are going to hear when they hear discussion on gender identity.

Allowing people the room to express their gender in a judgement free environment is not teaching them to do it

Absolutely, and I don't disagree with things like doing away with restrictions based on gender inside of elementary schools. There shouldn't be a time where a kid is doing things "as a boy" or "as a girl" in the first place. The only real time I can think of is when using a bathroom, and my experience of elementary school was that we had a single bathroom in every room.

That's literally all you've done

No, I've argued that as a direct consequence of teaching kids about being transgender from an early age, kids will attributed things like abuse to being trans.

A slippery slope argument is when I say that "because teachers are doing this minor thing now, some major and out of control thing will necessarily come out of it". What I am saying is the scope of behavior and result, not behavior leading to further more extreme behavior.

You've argued that if you give them the room to consider whether they are transgender

What exactly do you mean by "giving room"?

I think that when you, as a teacher, create an environment where some idea is common, kids will pick up on that idea as a tool with which to explain their internal state. Kids do not have the appropriate knowledge to do this, and we should not trust the things they say from such an early age as a statement on their actual or long-term identity. Secondly, where these misattributions exist, they can end up being abused or doing harm, so it is better to not bring up any topic or statement about identity that is assumed kids will begin learning about on their own.

What I am saying is that the word "trans" should never be heard by kids. Instead, the kids who begin saying "I feel like a (girl/boy)" and persist with this over a long period of time should be a) allowed to move forward with these statements without correction, and b) informed about what it means to be trans only after they have exited middle school or reached whatever age is considered appropriate for self-judgement on such topics.

This can be the case with anything you teach kids, not just being transgender, but that is the hot topic of the age.

then their other issue will go untreated

I think it probably would end up untreated either way, we aren't exactly great at mental health in the modern age.

this is provably false because kids desist at published rates

You aren't giving enough information for me to really get at what you are referring to here.

At the same time the regret rate among those that don't desist is very low

low != nonexistent. If I can choose the option where few mistake their identity to the options where fewer mistake their identity, I'm going to choose the latter.

[–]ruler_gurl 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Teachers in elementary schools, according to the article?

So according to the bitter old guy's editorial, teachers are now acting as licensed therapists and are diagnosing their students as transgender? If you buy this (and I guess you have since you've argued it several times), I have a super nice bridge in Brooklyn that I just can't afford to take care of any longer. I'd be happy to sell it to you for a great price. It has tremendous upside potential.

"if you feel sad about your body, or feel like a boy/girl, you might be trans" which is what young kids are going to hear when they hear discussion on gender identity.

And where did you hear that line uttered, a late night commercial from big pharma pushing estrogen? Is teaching kids that gay people exist, going to turn them gay too? It isn't up to teachers to diagnose kids. They aren't empowered to either diagnose kids, or to treat them. Getting transgender treatment for kids under 18 is a rat's nest of complexity and checks and balances. If you doubt me, I suggest you go lurk in a forum where parents of trans kids offer support and guidance. It's not remotely easy.

No, I've argued that as a direct consequence of teaching kids about being transgender from an early age, kids will attributed things like abuse to being trans. A slippery slope argument is when I say that "because teachers are doing this minor thing now, some major and out of control thing will necessarily come out of it".

You've argued that there will be a spate of kids with underlying mental conditions who will go undiagnosed and will instead be convinced they are transgender. As a result, you posit that they will have their lives ruined and commit suicide. You have zero data to support this assertion. How much more extreme do you figure it needs to be to qualify as a slippery slope argument? Would you have to argue that the space time continuum will be disrupted?

What exactly do you mean by "giving room"?

Allowing them to express their gender in a judgement free environment. It means using their preferred pronouns and name, rather than keep causing them anxiety and shame. It means getting them help from qualified gender therapists who can start to track their commitment to living in a different gender. It means not putting them in the same room with some fundamentalist hack who tries to shame them into conformity by telling them it's just all in your head or worse, it's Satan talking to you.

I think that when you, as a teacher, create an environment where some idea is common,

Being transgender isn't common, but that doesn't mean it should be stigmatized or be called out as some undesirable abnormality. You're making the same argument fundies make about same sex marriage. If you normalize it then everyone will get same sex married cause that will be the new normal!.

What I am saying is that the word "trans" should never be heard by kids. Instead, the kids who begin saying "I feel like a (girl/boy)" and persist with this over a long period of time should be a) allowed to move forward with these statements without correction, and b) informed about what it means to be trans only after they have exited middle school or reached whatever age is considered appropriate for self-judgement on such topics.

Having a word for something doesn't make people want to be that thing. The very legitimate reason for teaching kids what transgender means is so they have a context for understanding their fellow student who may be transgender. It's no different that the book about two mommies. Do you believe that a child reading a book about two mommies will cause them to want to grow up lesbian? It has only two potential effects, (1) If a child is lesbian/gay they'll be less likely to grow up hating themselves and (2) kids who aren't gay will be more likely to treat those who are with increased sensitivity and acceptance.

I think it probably would end up untreated either way, we aren't exactly great at mental health in the modern age

If you've sought out a qualified therapist, then there is a far higher probability that it actually will get treated rather than kicked down the road.

You aren't giving enough information for me to really get at what you are referring to here.

Kids who are allowed to start down the road to transition go through intensive therapy to ensure they have been consistent in their cross gender identification for years. The first step is hormone blockers to allow them to have 4 more years of doctor monitored therapy to ensure they are on the right track. During these intervening years they are monitored to determine the extent to which their transgender feelings persist, or desist. Those that want to stop, stop and some absolutely do. Those who don't request stopping but give ambiguous indications as to their commitment to transition aren't allowed to proceed.

Among those that do persist however, most continue to persist all the way through with extremely low rates of regret. None of this could possibly be true if the dire predictions of Walt Heyer were true. He's bitter; he's exceptionally biased; he's not a medical professional; and he's wrong.

low != nonexistent. If I can choose the option where few mistake their identity to the options where fewer mistake their identity, I'm going to choose the latter.

That is irrelevant. If you believe that the treatment can only be condoned if it is 100% successful then you are stating without ambiguity that transgender people matter so little that if there is any possible chance of a negative outcome for anyone, then transition must not be permitted for anyone. No treatment including cancer treatment has 100% success rates. You may be able to condone transgender kids committing suicide due to lack of treatment but I can't.

[–]bioemerl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

So according to the bitter old guy's editorial, teachers are now acting as licensed therapists and are diagnosing their students as transgender?

I did not say this.

Is teaching kids that gay people exist, going to turn them gay too?

I think it will lead to a slightly increased number of people who decide that they are gay or bi rather than straight. However, being gay isn't connected or able to be confused with the results of abuse, or connected to a person feeling dissatisfied or unhappy, so the benefits are well worth it, especially in an era where happy productive people is better than unhappy people who end up having kids which was the focus in the past.

You've argued that there will be a spate of kids with underlying mental conditions who will go undiagnosed and will instead be convinced they are transgender. As a result, you posit that they will have their lives ruined and commit suicide. You have zero data to support this assertion

Hey, we're done claiming fallacies, progress!

You are correct that I do not have much data to back up my points. However, I don't think there is any data on the subject at all, and where a possibility exists we should take care to consider it and avoid any possible consequences until data actually does exist. We are dealing with people's lives here, not something you take risks with.

As to your definition of "giving room" than you seem to have a very different idea of what I am talking about than what I am actually talking about. I will say that, while I am okay with the concept of using preferred genders, I am not okay with the concept of having kids go to a therapist at such an early age to "help" them deal with any sort of transition. That's exactly the sort of situation I want to avoid until the person in question has reached a point of maturity enough to challenge that authority and really have some measure of accurate introspection of themselves.

What I am discussing is only the idea that teachers go up and "teach" as one might teach math or science, the idea of gender identities or the ability to be transgender. Nothing more, nothing less.

but that doesn't mean it should be stigmatized or be called out as some undesirable abnormality.

It is an undesirable abnormality, people who are trans should have been born with a body of the opposite gender and people who exist in that state should not exist at all, if we had the power to make that so.

However, the state of being trans is the state of having issues with your mind/body, not a state of being an undesirable person, only of being a person with an undesirable condition that should be fixed down the line.

The very legitimate reason for teaching kids what transgender means is so they have a context for understanding their fellow student who may be transgender.

This seems to be a relatively minor issue from my point of view. I can't see kids being any more or less hostile to someone who acts as a different gender in their youth based on what their teachers say. This seems one of those cases like solving a minor issue with a massive hammer and breaking things in the process.

You're making the same argument fundies make about same sex marriage. If you normalize it then everyone will get same sex married cause that will be the new normal!.

The use of terms like "fundies" shows how little you pay attention and humanize those who disagree with you.

Secondly, this argument is not the one I am making. It may be similar, yes, but that similarity ends at quite a few very important areas. This statement is little more than an attempt at guilt by association.

Having a word for something doesn't make people want to be that thing.

Being explicitly told that X thing exists and signs Y Z W mean you have X will cause people to see situations of Y Z W and attribute it to X when they may not have if they had a good amount of information. Again, if we are going to teach kids about being trans, we should also teach them about all the different symptoms and signs of mental illness and abuse, and doing such a thing is absolutely impossible for kids to really have a good grasp on.

It's no different that the book about two mommies.

It's like having a book that says "if you ever feel attraction to a person of your gender, than you are a lesbian."

People, naturally, are very weird in what they are attracted to, without real context you are going to get a lot of people who read an example like my own and go "oh, I feel attraction when I look at people of my own sex". This will result in many people self-identifying as lesbians without understanding that having some level attraction to physical fitness and looks is natural for almost everyone. Very few people are "truly" straight.

Kids cannot understand that nuance, so it's dangerous to tell them about situations that simplify that nuance and lead them to false conclusions.

If you've sought out a qualified therapist

Let me just pull the huge amount of money out of my ass so that every kid in the nation can have easy access to therapy when half of their parents can't even afford to purchase their lunches.

Kids who are allowed to start down the road to transition go through intensive therapy to ensure they have been consistent in their cross gender identification for years.

I'm not saying how it's done today with doctors is a bad thing.

If you believe that the treatment can only be condoned if it is 100% successful

I did not say that treatments can only be condoned if it is 100% successful.

Again and again and again you keep putting your own fucking opinions and ideals of who you think I am onto me.

[–]nolongertrans -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

fucking transcultists. makes me so god damn mad.

[–]bioemerl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Do you think anyone is going to ever take you seriously using a term like "transcultists"?

[–]nolongertrans 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

good point. forgive me for getting emotional. it just makes me so angry to see the people that caused me and others so much pain up to their bullshit tricks.

[–]acthrowawayab 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What did they do, force-transition you?

[–]VoxVirilis -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If it's such a problem why aren't there small armies of disaffected, angry, ex-transgender people out there locking arms with Walt Heyer against the transgender medical complex?

Because a lot of them committed suicide. Read the damn article.

[–]ruler_gurl 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I suggest you get your information regarding transgender suicide rates from a researcher who studied it rather than from a bitter old ideologue who wants to abuse the data for political reasons. The suicide rate among those who aren't treated is roughly 400% higher than among those that do. The prime drivers behind self harm after treatment are social stigmatization, poverty abuse etc.

Or you could just go ahead and believe the lone ideologue if you wish.

[+]nolongertrans -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

people are being coerced every day on /r/asktransgender. why are there so few ex transgender people pissed off? it's a belief system that is as powerful as a religion. and so few people get into it there just aren't many detransitioners.

[–]ruler_gurl 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

there just aren't many detransitioners.

At least you made one correct observation.

[–]nolongertrans -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

thanks for the downvote. but both are true. i lived it, and it's cunts like you that propagated the garbage that got to me when i was in a very vulnerable state.

[–]ruler_gurl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't downvote you. Sorry you made a mistake too.

But what in the world would make you decide that it was a great idea to act upon the "diagnosis" of an anonymous person on the internet? Taking personal responsibility for the mistakes we make in life is an important part of the growth process. It's how we move forward. Don't be like the jackass who wrote this puff piece who wants to blame everyone but himself for his actions.

[–]MycenaeanGal 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Coerced?! So the mean trannies held your family hostage if you didn't take your estradiol? Those fiends.

[–]nolongertrans -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

they prop up an ideology that is over-inclusive and cultish.

[–]MycenaeanGal 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What you are calling "cultish" is just a simple ingroup-outgroup mentality. Much more tame. When you have a small group that is othered, this is a natural consequence.

The other aspects of a cult certainly aren't there, and I think you know that.

Look, I'm sorry transition did not work out for you. Truly I am. Dealing with the aftermath of that must be incredibly hard, but it was very much a decision you made, and one that you made repeatedly every time you took your medication. No one forced you. What's the term in these parts? Don't be a cuck?

[–]nolongertrans 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no, no one forced me. but they did convince me. once you think you might be trans you are trans. and trans people who don't transition either end up transitioning later or killing themselves.

[–]MycenaeanGal 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

once you think you might be trans you are trans.

That's not a position I see often on that sub. I see "Once you think you might be trans you should seriously consider visiting a therapist."

I always urge caution whenever I respond to those topics. I think others do as well.

[–]myevillaugh 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Seriously? That is such a homophobic article. “LGBT agenda"? If this is where this sub is headed, I'm getting off ASAP.

[+]GoodScumBagBrian -13 points-12 points-11 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

so ignore a serious problem because of a word you don't agree with?

[–]myevillaugh 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was on mobile. Now that I'm on desktop, let's go into details.

Socially indoctrinating young children toward accepting transgenderism is rampant today in public schools.

Acceptance just means don't be a dick to transgenders. This article makes it sound like a bad thing.

By infiltrating the curriculum in our nation’s public schools, LGBT activists can groom the next generation of participants.

Infiltrating? Yes, so secret that they want to do it in public schools. No one will ever find out! /s

Grooming? Just like those PSAs from the 50s, where all gay men were grooming boys into the gay lifestyle.

Now children in Washington state will be taught starting in kindergarten about the normalcy of wanting to be the other sex.

See point 1.

An August 2016 review of the scientific literature finds no definitive evidence in research to suggest that transgender people are born that way.

Oooo, the New Atlantis? That's published by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, which is a conservative advocacy group. One might say they have an agenda they would like to push. I'll wait until the AMA issues guidance on it.

I was a kid who started cross-dressing with my grandmother at the age of four. I can tell you from first-hand knowledge that cross-dressing is a psychological indoctrination.

Larger sample needed. He seems to have had personal issues, had some surgery done, and not happy with the results. That's sad and unfortunate, but he can tell his story without all the hateful language. He has an ax to grid.

Let's top it off that this author has no medical background. He has no qualifications to call it malpractice.

I'm disturbed that 618 people from this sub upvoted this bullshit.

[–]guy_guyerson 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no definitive evidence

Not just a questionable source, but a laughable standard for most medical/psychiatric research.

I'm disturbed that 618 people from this sub upvoted this bullshit.

I was surprised by that myself.

[–]grahamvinyl 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The article was written with a very negative tone toward homosexuality. It's obvious bias that taints any point trying to be made.

[+]GoodScumBagBrian -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

well honestly what's positive about it? It points out facts is what I took from it.

[–]PyroSpark 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

None of the things mentioned are facts at all though.

[–]ExpendableOne -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You realize that the "LGBT community" doesn't really represent all gay people, right? You realize that the "LGBT community" has also largely been co-opted by the "trans community"(or, at the very least, the trans movement has exploited their popularity and political position)? The 'T' in LGBT has literally nothing to do with sexual freedom/rights, and yet these two movements still operate under the same umbrella/label. If the LGBT movement didn't exist as it is and this person was wrongfully bunching up both movements, then maybe you could of had a point, but that's not really the case now is it.

[+]James32015 -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With the way things are going it does suspiciously look like an agenda.

[+]guy_guyerson -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

LGBT Agenda

I agree about the tone of the article, but I don't think this is the best example. GLSEN is an advocacy group and, pretty much be definition, has an agenda it's pursuing. There own site describes their efforts to " to affect positive change in schools".

Actually, the vast majority of the time I encounter anything describing its self as LGBT offline, it's some kind of pressure/lobby/advocacy group.

[–]myevillaugh 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See my other comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/542vhm/pushing_kids_into_transgenderism_is_medical/d7yxnvi

[–]franklindeer 31 points32 points33 points 9 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Not really a men's rights issue.

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I may be wrong but the only times I've heard of this happening was to young boys so it is a bit.

[–]franklindeer 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Not really. It's a problem for both boys and girls. For girls they start hormone therapy at puberty to create a more masculine appearance and for boys they will often use puberty blocking drugs. In both cases it's unethical because puberty itself seems to resolve the vast majority of childhood gender identity disorder. In any case so far as I can see it's not a uniquely male problem. The only thing I can see that might be a male specific issue is the acceptability of Tom boys vs feminine males.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hypersapien 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

One of the biggest problems we have is when feminists take non-gendered issues and focus only on how they affect women. Let's not start acting the same way.

[–]Temperfuelmma 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

How will us taking non gendered issues and not focusing only on how it affects men stop feminists from taking non gendered issues and focusing on how it only affects women?

[–]Hypersapien 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm saying we shouldn't be doing that.

[–]Temperfuelmma 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Right, I'm on mobile, I've re edited my post, I forgot to add a "not"

[–]Hypersapien -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't. It makes us not like them.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't exactly lead to better understanding of Men's Issues either.

Look at Warren Farrell, one of the nicest most neutral advocates for men whom once sat on the board of N.O.W. Now supporting Hillary Clinton and thinking free copies of his "The Myth Of Male Power" will ever convince a "Woman Card" player like her that men and boys face serious problems that shouldn't be ignored.

Sinking to their level doesn't work, you're right. But neither does playing the saint.

[–]Temperfuelmma 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And what does not being like them accomplish? Enough of this being the bigger man ego bullshit might as well help men than sit over the corner with your dick in your hands.

[–]Kafke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In both cases it's unethical because puberty itself seems to resolve the vast majority of childhood gender identity disorder. I

No. "Gender identity disorder" is never resolved. There's no known way to alter this. What you're thinking of is a study about gender nonconforming kids below the age of 12. Roughly 40% of gnc kids drop the non-conformity. Trans kids are trans for life and generally it gets worse with puberty, not better. It's why most trans people end up transitioning right after the peak or right at the peak of puberty and hormonal changes: 18-21.

But you're indeed right. It's not just a male problem.

[–]ChromeWeasel 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was interesting as hell though. I'm glad the article was posted somewhere that it popped up on my Reddit.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]1st_transit_of_venus 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

These kids insist on their genders from young ages, persist with symptoms of gender dysphoria for years, and as puberty begins experience great distress. If untreated, the symptoms worsen and continue into adulthood. It sounds like that was not your experience at all. They don't just put young boys on estrogen the minute they pick up a doll or put on a dress.

...or because they really wanted a girl...

This is a serious issue. I know parents who are going through this with their children, and while it may be difficult to understand that's no excuse to demonize the parents.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ruler_gurl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If one of the child's parents was a turtle whether mutant or not then I'd be willing to consider the possibility. However since there is no current way for a turtle, or a unicorn, or a dolphin, or an attack helicopter to give birth to a human child, I'm going to say that's a foolish comparison and leave it at that.

[–]1st_transit_of_venus -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You make a good point. Teenage mutant ninja turtles was not about pizza, or ninjutsu, or talking brains with tentacles controlling robots - it was about gender. The two concepts are practically indistinguishable. Changing gender should be seen as no less ridiculous than having cosmetic surgery to look like a turtle.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ExpendableOne 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It is and it isn't. Gender Dysphoria is, first and foremost, a mental health issue that affects both genders(in that sense, not really a men's rights issue) but, realistically, you also can't really ignore the possibility that a lot of boys develop gender dysphoria as a result of the way boys are treated compared to girls(which is to say, rather poorly with boys generally facing greater levels of physical/psychological abuse, social/sexual isolation and vilification and gender specific expectations/stress). Boys who grow up being subjected to identity politics or told that they have a female brain because they feel excluded by women otherwise, are victims of a misandric system and that is a men's rights issue.

There's a reason why gender dysphoria cases tends to be predominantly MtF, and it is cultural. And, culturally speaking, we are also far less capable to identify these causes because of the predominant feminist narrative of "girls are oppressed and boys are oppressing them", "girls are disadvantaged and boys are privileged in all ways", "girls are powerless and boys control everything" and/or "women are victims and men are perpetrator"(which, besides being completely untrue, also means these narratives are not only contributing to the mental health issues in boys but actively impeding in providing proper assessments/treatment as well). This also makes it a men's rights issue.

The "trans-community" is also a movement that has piggy-backed itself onto other movements like the LGB movement(which is about sexual freedom) and feminism(which is incredibly biased against men, and toxic to men in every regards). That movement essentially getting to promote incredibly unhealthy ideology/propaganda under the protection of those other movements(where questioning their delusions becomes politically incorrect because feminists say so), also makes it an ethical issue that coincides with anti-feminism and men's rights.

[–]sagetrainee -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right -- why is this posted here?

[–]WhatIsTheMaximumLeng-9 points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

This sub isn't really about men's rights, more about yelling bullshit. Its like the male version of feminazis.

There is a real and moderate mens' rights sub on Reddit, but of course it isn't linked from the sidebar.

[–]franklindeer 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As much as this sub has gone down hill over the past few months, I still can't guess at what sub you're talking about it's OneY which has very few users and very little content. If you're talking about menslib then you're full of shit.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There ought to be a classification of crime parallel to malpractice, but for teachers who cause harm in their practice.

[–]romulusnr 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aside from being patently traditionalist pap, I fail to see how it is even remotely relevant to the topic of this sub... And moreover, how it continues to taint egalitarianism just by promoting it within here. It smacks rather redpilly.

[–]zutonofgoth 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I friends child is transitioning from boy to girl. They are the perfect family, a family just like any oyher family you know. When i first met her she behaved like a girl and it was just strange. The way she carried herself and the way she played. It almost made sence when she went to her parents and discussed it with them trasitioning. She new more than her parents about it. Now i gaurentee you would never pick her past life. The kids at her school are very accepting. It is not malpractice... it is just life. Now we can do something about it.

[–]OneWayFuck 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Except for as the medical evidence shows there is an 80% chance t he GID he suffers from will go away by the time he has gone through puberty and by then th e damage his parents have aloud to be done to his body can cause a multitude of other problems both mentally and physicaly

[–]Kafke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Otherway around. 100% of people with GID have dysphoria that worsens at puberty. Since it's a hormonal disorder.

What you're thinking of is kids under the age of 12 who are gender nonconforming. 40-80% of them grow out of it.

[–]Sup909 -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So, your trying to say your unsourced fact and personal opinion is more important than that of the family and child going through the process?

[–]OneWayFuck 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Desisting and persisting gender dysphoria after childhood: a qualitative follow-up study. Steensma TD1, Biemond R, de Boer F, Cohen-Kettenis PT.

The studies the authors cite followed a total of 246 children; only 39 of them had gender dysphoria after puberty, thus the overall persistence rate for the dysphoria was 16%. The persistence rate varied among the different studies from 2% to 27% (i.e. 73%-98% of the children stopped having gender dysphoria).

there is also medical evidence that GID can be caused by Aspergers and that before even considering gender reassignment treatment of any kind especially in a minor they should be tested for autism. there was even a study where two males suffering from GID that had aspergers once treated for the aspergers no longer had GID. \

edit: also it has very little to do with personal opinion but since you brought it up here are my opinions on the matter. Its a fact your brain does not finish developing until your mid 20s. From the time you are born till youre in your 20s youre going to keep changing and wanting different things. Its irresponsible to allow such drastic treatments especially in children when they are not even fully matured yet and will most likely change their mind. Also the main point of the article was the pushing kids into transgenderism through state sponsered education systems. Just like we keep church out of public schools we need to keep politics out as well. Not to mention in my opinion it is horribly financially irresponsible. The amount of time, money and energy going to be wasted on such an irrelevant program could be better spent else where such as arts or sports. This is more unfounded and personal opinion here but in my highschool there were almost 2000 students. Of those there was only one openly transgendered student. Now we are supposed to force the other 1999 students and staff to undergo training and classes or watever else this program entails for the sake of .05 percent of the population.

[–]mikebong64 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is it unsourced and unfounded? He may not have cited any source but I'm willing to wager in his favor that he's right. As a child I think everybody wonders what is like to switch to the other sex. To actually make the switch over is something that I don't agree with. People should try behavior therapy to get adjusted to the body they were born into. Because you can't give a man ovaries and you can't give a woman testicles. If someone wants to give up on what they where born with so be it but don't try to cover up the facts .

[–]guy_guyerson 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

This is a genuine question: what distinguishes him from being an effeminate boy? Or is that what we're calling 'trans' now?

Edit: Seriously? Downvotes? It's seems like an obvious question. Did I strike some kind of nerve here?

[–]Kafke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

what distinguishes him from being an effeminate boy?

Well to start, she's a girl. Neurologically, psychologically, and presumably now hormonally. But perhaps the answer your looking for is: there can be and often are masculine trans women. Femininity/masculinity is often irrelevant, because the issue isn't beheavior/mannerisms/etc. The issue is that the sex of the body diverges from the person's neurological sex.

[–]guy_guyerson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well to start, she's a girl.

That's not helpful. Unless they have XX chromosomes, I'm more than comfortable referring to them as a boy. Words have meanings, we have scientific definitions, and anything else borders on creationism level 'ignore the facts because some people find them uncomfortable'.

from the person's neurological sex.

Is there any empirical data to suggest this is solidified prior to neurological maturity in their 20's?

[–]Kafke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's not helpful.

Except it is. It's pretty common sense unless you've literally never met a trans person. This is a dude. And this is a girl. It's pretty straight forward to anyone with eyes.

Unless they have XX chromosomes, I'm more than comfortable referring to them as a boy.

What about those with XX male syndrome? Or those with androgen insensitivity? Or people with XXY chromosomes? On top of that, chromosomes are almost entirely unable to be deduced when given a person's biological makeup. How do you know she doesn't have XX chromosomes? Certainly she could have XX chromosomes, some hormonal or chromosomal disorder that lead to masculine development, and the she transitioned to be female? Why the fuck are you assuming people's medical history? Simply because you're transphobic?

Words have meanings, we have scientific definitions, and anything else borders on creationism level 'ignore the facts because some people find them uncomfortable'.

Well yes, words have meanings, and you're intentionally rejecting the meaning of words in favor of an obscure definition that literally no one (and I mean no one) uses. The goverment doesn't use it. Doctors don't use it. Scientists/researchers don't use it. The average person doesn't use it. No one. No one except those trying to invalidate trans identities by failing to grasp that people's chromosomes do not match their sex in all cases.

Is there any empirical data to suggest this is solidified prior to neurological maturity in their 20's?

Certainly. You'd basically have to ignore the stereotypical trans narrative, the experiences of many trans people, the diagnosis of tons of kids, many medical doctors, the DSM, every health organization, and tons of research, in order to say otherwise.

From what I can see, gender identity (the neurological sex) forms in the womb. And being aware of your gender identity happens by the age of 8. It'd be safe to bump that limit up to 12, to eliminate cis kids who are gender non-conforming. It seems silly that this is the point you're trying to argue. It's pretty much the one with the most stuff backing it.

[–]guy_guyerson -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure why you provided that link, it leads to what appears to be diagnostic criteria, not an analysis that refutes the idea that the vast majority of cases of prepubescent feelings of gender incongruence disappear naturally after puberty.

That 'dude' has vagina. I've seen it in action. To pretend he's a clear cut case of what 'men' are is bizarre. To call it common sense is disingenuous.

What about those with XX male syndrome?

Every hundred thousand people or so I'll get it wrong. I'll probably apologize.

Why the fuck are you assuming people's medical history?

I'm playing the odds. They're really comfortable odds.

neurological sex

There is no medical consensus that this even exists. There is some statistical evidence that hints in this direction and that's about all.

[–]nolongertrans -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you are getting downvoted because the tranny brigade is out in full force in this thread. they are a bunch of cultists and they will use any means necessary to silence any opposing ideas.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is trans in quotation marks?

[–]guy_guyerson 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Edit: sorry, I mistook the context of you question. I'm deleting what I had here because I thought I was answering something else.

I quoted it because I'm asking if this is what the parent comment meant by the term. I'm quoting them, in a sense.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If they want to be laughed at, then let them.

[–]Kizrock94 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm fine with people being who they are, but pushing for who they are not is way out of line now

[–]WhatIsTheMaximumLeng-3 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Its bullshit articles like this being upvoted, that this sub has such a trashy reputation.

Tried it for a few days, hasn't improved a bit. I'm out (again).

[–]LiteraryIdiot -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm really glad to see this article with support. I feel as if it boils down to the topic of "over-diagnosis" which is already commonly debated in the medical field - but somehow a taboo topic when it comes to transgender matters.

As for my story - I am a female, but spent most of my teen years wishing I was a boy - even dressing the part and using makeshift 'prosthetics' in private. My parents didn't scold me or discourage it - they somewhat ignored it (not in a dismissive way, but in a 'nothing odd here' way). Now (from a selfish standpoint), I am frequently grateful that transgender was not a widely accepted concept when I was a teen. Even a well meaning, overly supportive Dr. may have pushed me (very susceptible to suggestion) into a decision I was not ready to make; and would have regretted. I worry about teens like myself, and how they will be effected by this in another 5-10 years. (Don't get me wrong, I support the trans community, I just want to be sure people are making the right choice)

Now, for the MRA aspect of this - I really do think that this effects males more often. I remember watching a Docu on trans kids. If I recall right, it involved Jazz. Now even though she made her decision so young, it seems to fit her. What concerned me was another child, born male that it didn't seem to fit (in my opinion). His father was deployed(?)- Basically he only had female role models, and a baby sister. His pediatrician "diagnosed" him transgender after he was observed trying to breastfeed a baby doll. Seeing this kid living as a girl, nearing her teen years... I don't know, The poor child didn't have the conviction that many have but was still being pushed to live this way (Even when asked it was more of a shrug and 'I guess so'). It felt like a subtle brainwashing was going on from a young age. Really - do you think at the age of 3 or so he understood only females breastfeed? Just because a young boy wants to copy mom and wear her heels/jewelry/makeup or whatnot doesn't mean jack squat. So what if a boy love glitter or tutus? That stuff is fun, and its not until adults assign genders to that stuff that it means anything. If girls turn to "masculint" things its because they'er strong, diversified, or a tomboy - which is cool.

I'll try to find the link after work, but I feel as if that childs experience is a good example of the topic at hand. (Granted, you never know the hidden agenda of any documentary so I treat most of them more as anecdotes than fact.)

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Check out r/genderqueer, alot of confused kids there complain about making mistakes of transitioning

[–]zach_chris12 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for posting this!

[+][deleted] -31 points-30 points-29 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

transgender people pay taxes and vote, so their agenda can be represented in schools as a part of sex education. proportionally to the people who are not transgender. so out of the sex ed classes, they should dedicate about half a second to the topic to proportionally represent the minority. just long enough to say "faggot" - and by that I don't mean gay.

[–]predalienmack 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You do realize you are talking about children, right? It's not any more right to talk about adults in such a way, either, but at least adults can make their own decisions and you can choose to disagree with their decisions. Most children with GID who receive some sort of hormone therapy or a puberty-delaying treatment have minimal real say in the matter as they are mostly not in charge of their own well being and the medical decisions made pertaining to them. You're saying confused children with minimal self agency and adults who have committed to a life altering decision that will make them socially ostracized for the rest of their lives should be burned? Maybe you should spend some time (more than the second you feel should be dedicated to teaching about trans people) self-critiquing and mulling over such a barbaric viewpoint.

[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

damn the stupid is strong with this one.

[–]orcscorper -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is shit. The author claims he was indoctrinated into cross-dressing at the age of four, with his grandmother? Maaaybe not the best person to comment on transgender issues. I think he may have some issues of his own to work out, and this is not the best way to go about it. Then he went on an extended rant against lobotomies, apparently to show that surgical solutions to mental disorders are very bad.

[+]Phototoxin -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Next week I start in an all girls school... oh sorry all-pupil school. That makes no sense though..... dragged away by the PC police

[–]xCAPTAINxTEXASx -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, just stupid

[+]oO0-__-0Oo -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I 100% agree, and it has become startlingly common for both greedy doctors (mostly surgeons) to do this, and for laypeople to pressure children into it (and "transgenderism" in general).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

By the looks of it most people seem to simply say "You are transgender." The criteria on most sources regarding finding out your gender identity is in general very ambiguous and seem to almost tell you you're trans if you question your identity. Whether you have Clear dysphoria due to your gender, but also if you don't have such clear dysphoria. Its a little tough to explain but if you looked it up you'd see it.

Source: Questioning my gender. Everything points at every possible conclusion. Have decided I'll just do what I feel like and see where that takes me.

[–]oO0-__-0Oo 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well put.

Most people who experience gender dysphoria simply resolve on their own without any clinical intervention and a lot of them end up gay. No big deal. That's just by the stats.

Take care.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps, while we cannot deny the existence of trans people, but considering the way things go and keep telling you you're trans in just about every way, there's bound to be some fault.

Could you give me said stats/links please?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter