~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link
There's a difference between slutty and over-emotional, tbh, that I don't think RP makes often enough. I am absolutely ''crazy'' (in the clinical sense) -- but my kind of crazy is not what RPers seem to be talking about from what I've picked up.
I'm cold and distant rather than overly-emotional. Under-emotional rather than fiery, with a tendency to disappear when it comes to relationships due to commitment issues.
Tbh, a lot of this behaviour is classic ''masculine'' crazy -- commitment issues, overly distant, workaholic, values ''freedom'' too much to pay proper attention to partner etc I find that many of the ''slutty'' women I encounter are much like me.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
I'm cold and distant
Somehow that's actually ten times worse. I dated a girl like that and couldn't get her riled up at all..
The ones that throw shit are way more entertaining.
Both are pretty slutty tho.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Somehow that's actually ten times worse.
Yeah, I agree. I prefer people who get angry and who are emotional. But it's really just not my style.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Drama is pretty fun, ain't it? Lol, we've created the performing arts because life has no meaning and the only way for us to find meaning is to be crowned with an endless parade of drama <3
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link
"Both are pretty slutty" so basically a cold woman and an emotional woman are slutty.. So ALL women are slutty, to you? Maybe they're not slutty but just like.. humans with a sex drive? This speaks more about you than them.. You feeling the need to attach a negative label to every woman you're involved with.
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Nah, there are different reasons for sluttiness. Cold and slutty is usually emotionally damaged where she's shut off. Warm and slutty is damaged where she's constantly seeking approval through sex. There's more variance than this, but just an example.
A healthy woman may have some casual sex here and there, but for the most part will only have sex in monogamous relationships because that best benefits her, does not waste her power and dilute the sexual market(the main cause of slut shaming by women).
Cold and slutty is usually emotionally damaged where she's shut off
I think people have misinterpreted me and assumed that I'm just cold and aloof when it comes to my sexual partners. Nope. I'm cold and aloof when it comes to conflict and/or other people's drama in all situations.
I'm warm towards my sexual partners. Until they start acting like drama queens and I'm like, ''whatever, with your bullshit, meh''. Raising legitimate issues and just trying to get into an ''emotional'' fight or have some ''drama'' with me are different.
[–]Boobear3-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The majority of women seek approval through sex or just male attention because society has taught them to do so. To act as if it's the woman's problem and that only "damaged" women do this.. shows you don't understand societal pressures.
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It is true that our society exacerbates this need for validation and male attention. But this is a constant around the world across all cultures.
Society utilizes your biological responses against you.
Not that men are spared. Our society is hyper sexual and hyper violent, and then men are condemned for being sexual and violent.
Our society is insane and breeds insanity. A beautiful creation of misery.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ok. So can we agree there's plenty normal women who seek male approval and it doesn't mean anything is mentally wrong with them? or do you still think the only women who seek it are crazy sluts.
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Healthy women require and seek male approval. Most women have a pretty strong need to feel desired.
Many sluts tend to seek it more in hopes of fulfilling some pain or void.
But, there's also the type of slut that just likes sex and isn't really indiscriminate either.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Well, since the conversion was about mental health issues I thought that was the group of women were were discussing
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I also know many women with mental health issues who are not slutty. This isn't really a thing.
Depression kills your sex drive, tbh.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
That's true. But sometimes I think depressed girls look to sex as a way to feel love
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
Doubt it. It's more likely a way to try and feel something. Anhedonia can make you do all kinds of crazy things just to feel anything. But it also tends to kill your sex drive like woah, so I imagine that this would be rare-ish.
If I want to feel ''love'' buying a puppy seems like a better bet than a ONS, tbh. And it's not like I can ''love'' any schmuck that's there and willing to date me -- I have to actually be keen.
I have casual sex to feel physical pleasure, because it's fun as all hell, not to experience ''love''.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Actually buying a puppy isn't a bad idea. Dogs make great companions.
I've always had problems with high risk behavior. Adrenaline junkies is probably a good description. Fast cars, fast bikes, and crazy girls.
And it's not that I could never get normal girls. I did, and i should've stayed with them.. they were very stable
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It's not. I would do it if I wanted to feel loved -- but I already do, so I'm all good on that front. It's just always been my ''tragically lonely and in need of comfort'' game plan -- puppy, not ONS.
I've always had problems with high risk behavior.
Is it a problem, though? So have I. I think it's made my life more interesting and enjoyable, although there have been downsides as well.
it's not that I could never get normal girls.
Go for someone who's interesting but normal. It's a thing.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
is that a problem tho?
It almost bit me in the ass big time. So I freaked out and settled down. These days I'm not sure which path in going to take. My friend passed away today so leaning towards just saying fuck it. Live life there's no tomorrow
[–]TutankhansetamunBlue Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Cold and distant reads more as dangerous than crazy, to be honest. Like, if a girl isn't showing emotion, you can call her crazy, but only in the sense that you don't know if she's going to stab you.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I do read as dangerous, tbh -- it's not that I seem like I'm unhinged enough to stab you, but that I seem like I won't tolerate any bullshittery.
To clarify, I am only cold and distant in response to men getting petty and dramatic about shit. I am cold in response to this with everyone in my life -- parents, friends etc.
[–]TutankhansetamunBlue Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nah, I get it. I've been accused of the same. I just wouldn't call your behavior crazy.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And most men who've dated me would agree. I'm bloodless, not ''crazy'' in the sense that men mean when they use this word to describe women.
But RP would insist that I behave like a crazy person in a relationship because I have bipolar.
[–]Offhisgame0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
My gf is legit crazy. She actually doesnt mind when i call her it since she knows it to be true. Shes just out there alot...
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link
I'd like to see a man who doesn't think his girlfriend is crazy. Seems pretty rare. Maybe they're not that crazy and it's more that those men just have low tolerance and low patience for normal emotional female behaviors because they lack the ability to empathize? Hmm.
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Everyone's crazy. The trick is finding a man who's crazy matches with a woman's crazy.
But, men call women crazy often because feelings are irrational and seem crazy when viewed logically.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Yeah but there seem to be a good amount of men who call most women crazy. Like there are men who will call literally all their exes crazy in some form. Leading me to believe maybe these women are not that crazy and Maybe it is actually the man's issue - emotionally immature and unable to foster empathy for someone.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The specific men who say all their ex's are crazy are probably also crazy themselves. Like attracts like.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Their exes generally aren't crazy. They're just stupid and think she's obviously ''nuts'' because she got mad at them for breaking up with her, or whatever. Like there are a lot of dudes who peg normal emotional reactions as ''crazy'' in order to avoid acknowledging their role in causing those emotions. It's immature.
It's different with the crazies who attract other crazies. They don't say all my exes are ''crazy'' in that ''but why would I attract drama?! Me? I, who am perfectly sane!!!'' tone. They talk about how crazy people are the interesting ones and quote Kerouac on that point or whatever.
The first is a red flag for me, the second is endearing if slightly worrying.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Like there are a lot of dudes who peg normal emotional reactions as ''crazy'' in order to avoid acknowledging their role in causing those emotions. It's immature.
Yes, this is what I think. mild gaslighting also comes into play, a basic example would be a guy breaks up with a girl and tells her she's ugly, boring, basically just says a bunch of terrible things about her appearance and personality, then the girl is rightly overcome with intense sadness and anger and she yells at him, then guy goes, "wow my ex is crazy, she just completely yelled at me for telling the truth". Like no shit she's going to yell at you, you just insulted nearly everything about her. Some guys have no self awareness.
A real life example I can give when some guy called me crazy was when this guy wrote something vaguely mean about me on Twitter (they apparently call it sub tweeting) and I brought it up and then he deleted it and then said there's nothing there and he didn't know what I was talking about. Then I got mad. And he literally said to me "this is why I don't like girls, they're crazy!" Like wtf is that? You just said something rude about me on social media and deleted it and won't even apologize and I'm the crazy one? Lol. Weird immature bullshit.
The same guy contacted me like 2 years later and wanted to see me again. No thanks buddy.
Some guys have no self awareness
And, tbh, some guys are manipulative and lash out at people, as well.
The person in that situation who is crazy isn't the woman, but the man. Being vindictive enough to say all of that to someone instead of just breaking up with them gracefully says a lot about you.
But then he'll turn it around, make her seem ''overly emotional'' and because we've always thought women are more crazy, wider society is likely to believe him.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
But.. Say there's a guy who had 3 relationships. 1 was 3 years, others were less than 6 months. He thinks the one of 3 years was crazy. Maybe he just didn't get to know the shorter term gf's well enough to realize he would've thought they were crazy too. Maybe he just needed a little more time and information. Hence my theory that many guys think 90% of women are crazy Even when they're just being women.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What even is your argument here? All men think all women are crazy all the time?
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They see relatively normal female behavior as crazy
Its more like, when men and women breakup, women often do crazy shit.
So there's a lot of stories of crazy exs.
Women can act crazy on desire, kind of how women can choose to cry when they want to too.
Of course there are different degrees of craziness.
Smartness, education, race, upbringing don't matter.
You'll take it negatively most likely, but all women being able to be crazy comes with the nature of being emotional creatures.
A woman that never acts crazy would be quite an odd woman.
Empathy, haha, don't even get me started on empathy.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
QFT
[–]LSTW12341 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Some men appear to want/expect to date men in women's bodies as opposed to women.
Yeah because ultimately they don't like women
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
'd like to see a man who doesn't think his girlfriend is crazy.
I am actually crazy, but my husband regularly tells me how freakishly not-crazy he finds me to be. Like, when I'm ''good'', my mood is almost always at ''content'' and he finds me insanely easy to get along with. He's also really low-hassle, for the most part.
[–]bonerdude42011 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
i wouldnt recommend a woman date a drug addict, drunk, violet or criminal man. Whats the problem?
Both men and women have rights to screen or reject people for whatever reasons we want, 'fair' or not.
[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Let's say there would be a female TRP and let's take sports as an analogy.
"no woman wants to date men who watch sports. men who like sports are violent alcoholics. Sports are violent by nature and the more sports they watch the more violent they become. I've been to a bar when they watched the super bowl and they ended up fighting: AMALT. They are broken because no sports team wanted them and normal men that watch sports are total outliers."
The problem here isn't telling women that they shouldn't date drug dealers, criminals, violent men or addicts. The problem is pretending that having sex is the issue, but not that the actual problems are the issue.
"I don't want to date sluts because I don't want no irresponsible partner" so screen for that instead, "but I don't want her to be an addict" so screen for that as well, "but STDs" but tests, "but she will cheat" so could a virgin.
One problem here is that TRPers pretend as if broken sluts are the norm and normal ones total outliers, but that's just because they either lack experience with women or because of confirmation and selection bias.
Promiscuity also correlates with higher self esteem, but somehow those kinds of sluts don't exist in TRP-world. It supposedly works on all kinds of women yet they primarily find low self esteem sluts with BPD and the self fulfilling prophecy of TRP wins again.
[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So you are claiming that it's just chance that some women end up with a n count of 50 and they are just the same psychologically, emotionally and have the same values as a woman that ends up with a n count of 5?
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I basically addressed this argument of yours earlier in the week, twice, and you ignored it.
Its your main quip with TRP, and implicitly you're saying TRP is just made of stupid men who never interact or are successful with normal women and never adjust TRP for normal women.
You also completely ignore the existence of married rp, most of those girls are on the normal side too.
I wonder if you have any other contentions with rp.
[–]TheScamr2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
The promiscuous are literal disease vectors.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Not really. promiscuous girls take better care of their sexual health. its the nice girl that fucks a chad once or twice a year that doesn't bother to check if she has stds LOL
[–]TheScamr2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Yeah no. Damn near all the guys I know in the game love hitting it raw. And therefor the women they are fucking are getting hit up raw.
They are disease vectors. The both the dudes and the chicks are not really not screening their partners.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Do you see them fuck the girls raw or do you hear telling you that they fuck the girls raw? LOL
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
They are top men.
I trust them.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
They are top men. I trust them.
That doesn't mean what they say is worth shit LOL
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Fine. Just ignore condom usage is generally is below 50%.
haha. condoms do suck.
Seriously that low? Fuck I hate condoms.
most std's have symptoms and are very treatable. Google is your friend.
[–]SexyMcSexingtonThe Alpha and the Omega0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
All the sluts I banged got regular STD testing.
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because they probably got burned once before.
"They primarily find low self esteem sluts with BPD"
Honestly... Seems like many Trps are just inexperienced or just have naturally low tolerance for any type of emotional behavior from women, so they label all normally emotional women with low self esteem or BPD.
i wouldnt recommend a woman date a drug addict, drunk,
Why not? What's wrong with any of that? I don't deserve love?
😭
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Well, the manosphere isn't ever really going to address this because most things you'll find in that arena are pushing a "men are wonderful" narrative (supposedly to counteract feminism but that's a different topic for another day) rather than anything "fair and balanced".
you'll find in that arena are pushing a "men are wonderful" narrative
Nah, I'm a pretty shitty human being. I wouldn't date me if I was a girl 😅
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You'll have a difficulty finding any "Fair and balance" discussion in any gendered-community, however at least most of the Manosphere subs won't ban you for expressing them.
Perhaps it's my bias, but i see a lot more "To be fair"-objections in the male-dominated communities.
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, it's your bias.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Totally. If you visit the askwomen sub and you don't spend every minute there praising every below and average chick who's alive, you get banned haha.
[–]kunlangeta points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Few things.
First, what do men have to do with anything? TRP is for men, who pursue women. Therefore, it is not concerned with avoiding bad male partners for romantic relationships.
Second, all those women who are called crazy, but aren't by your definition, know how to behave. "Crazy" doesn't come at first date, or anything near it. It comes out later, when she got her hooks in a man and feels more comfortable. It is, more often than not, bait and switch.
Third, those "overly emotional" women treat "alphas" really great. Now, since hitting the gym and changing my behavior, I had women drive me around (cause I was drunk/high) or buy me beer (even though I make more than them), which was honestly something I never experienced earlier.
And finally, when woman is "overly emotional" people call her crazy cause she acts insane. No amount of logical reasoning will convince her, much better thing to do is ignore her and feed her or change her emotional state somehow. Call it however you want, but a lot of men aren't equipped to deal with that behavior (and honestly, with equal, rational human being, you shouldn't have to deal with that shit) and that is why they are called crazy.
[–]SmurfESmurferson2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
TRP is for men, who pursue women
PPD is for men and women, some of whom pursue men.
Fair enough, but original complaint was directed at manosphere, which does not (to my knowledge) concern itself with female dating issues.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Why the fuck would we concern ourselves with female dating issues? What female dating issues? There is no such thing. Don't be fat. Shower daily. Don't be a fucking nag. Pretend to care about what he says. There you go, good game, now every woman in the world has no ''female dating issues.''
GIMME A SECOND.
I'm going to ask the future Prince of Sweden about his issues getting a job.
ROFL.
I don't mean issue of woman getting laid, that shit is easy. I was thinking of something more long term, hypergamy and all.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
its also easy for women to get a relationship, just not with a 25 year old brad pitt.
Ok, its not easy for women to be happy in relationship. Or single. I don't envy them at all. As a guy, with a plate or two, just doing my thing, I think I am more content than most women.
lol i'm pretty content too, even when I have dry spells. It must suck to be short, weak, and to depend on men for everything.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You actually don't have to deal with that shit so saying you shouldn't have to is redundant
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
First, what do men crazy have to do with anything? TRP is for men, who pursue women. Therefore, it is not concerned with avoiding bad male partners for romantic relationships.
Wait, I thought women didn't pursue men? That its up to men to approach and to pursue women? HAHA, finally, the blue pillers come clean with the reality that women only approach chads.
I wonder why there would be women on PPD who are here to learn how to pursue men.
Step 1.
Take a shower.
Step 2.
Approach a man.
Step 3.
Say, ''wanna fuck?''
There you go, that's all women need to do to pursue men. Blue pill women should trade places with men who aren't chad to see how different both our worlds are lolol.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Pursuing men for sex is easy, but getting an attractive boyfriend is hard.
that's what happens when women only want chads, deal with it 😅
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
But you said it was easy, when clearly it's not. "Deal with it" is probably the worst piece of advice known to man, by the way.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
But you said it was easy, when clearly it's not.
Of course its easy. Women just make it hard. Have harems where women share Chads as boyfriends, problem solved. The problem with women is how selfish and arrogant they are, expecting a chad to commit to them. What's so special about any given girl anyway
Deal with it" is probably the worst piece of advice known to man, by the way.
Its what the blue pillers are famous for lolol
selfish and arrogant they are, expecting a chad to commit to them.
Our innate desire for pair-bonding is related to the well-being of our young, therefor it's not selfish at all.
What's so special about any given girl anyway
Individual personality traits, obviously. They impact the way she interacts with you, the feelings she evokes, and how much chemistry you have.
I know, but they're usually telling it to fugly neckbeards whose only other option is plastic surgery.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Our innate desire for pair-bonding
What pair-bonding desire dude, if women had a pair-bond desire they'd want to bond as early as possible with non-chads instead of chasing chad dick until they can't do it anymore. Funny how that Pair-bonding is doublespeak for following's one wet clit.
s related to the well-being of our young, therefor it's not selfish at all
Ah, so everything a woman does she can excuse it as caring about their young'(which women aren't having while young, funninly enough) children so its not selfish 😂
You mean how good she sucks dick and how much she does it? So what makes her special anyway as most girls start sucking dick at 15 and younger?
They're actualyl saying it to every guy who isn't a chad
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
if women had a pair-bond desire they'd want to bond as early as possible with non-chads instead of chasing chad dick until they can't do it anymore
That would make no sense, biologically. Non-Chads are not attractive, so there's no desire for any kind of bonding with them. Most teenage girls DO want to bond as early as possible (with a guy who's attractive to them). But, they learn quickly that teenage boys do not want the same thing.
Funny how that Pair-bonding is doublespeak for following's one wet clit
The clit knows what makes strong, healthy, pretty babies that will in turn create more babies.
so everything a woman does she can excuse it as caring about their young
Nearly everything a woman is instinctually driven to do is to ensure the survival and health of both her and her children, yes. Those instincts wouldn't exist if they did not serve this purpose.
Haha, maybe she knows how to stimulate a prostate while doing it? :P That's a new trick. And, a girl with a good personality can talk to you on end about your favorite topics (after she swallows, of course).
Exactly, the guys with no hope of being physically attractive. They can either "deal with it", or get plastic surgery and testosterone.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
That would make no sense, biologically. Non-Chads are not attractive, so there's no desire for any kind of bonding with them.
Ah, so since non-chads are not attractive to women, that means that every woman in the world is tricking every man they are in a relationship with, using them and manipulating them and stealing away from them, because women are only attracted to chads.
And you think chads would want to commit to women when even a woman admits how shitty and how trashy women as a whole are?
👌🏻
Oh, so you are advocating for eugenics? Does that mean that every woman who isn't 6 feet tall, naturally beautiful, natural blonde with blue eyes and huge tits has no right to reproduce, or is this only a ''i want i want i want '' womanly thing?
😂
Nearly everything a woman is instinctually driven to do is to ensure the survival and health of both her and her children, yes. The instincts wouldn't exist if they did not serve this purpose.
There you have it, folks. Her children. Children never belong to men. Men should just drop out and not pay for the children women have.
Haha, maybe she knows how to stimulate a prostate while doing it? :P
As if its hard for any girl to learn how to do that.
And a girl with a good personality can talk to you on end about your favorite topics (after she swallows, of course).
Women have good personalities? Since when?
Women are only as good as their looks go.
Exactly, the guys with no hope of being physically attractive. They can either "deal with it" or get plastic surgery and testosterone.
Lol, you know that not everyone can grow to become 6 feet tall + and that's essential for a woman to consider a guy attractive right?
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What percentage of attractive women do you find to be "rational" and not crazy? Hmm
I have no idea. In general, humans suck at intuitive statistical thinking, so I really could not tell you. On top of that, as I mentioned, "crazy" often doesn't rear its ugly head until later in a relationship, so I can't even try to approximate it at first glance.
I do know, however, that there are a lot of women who have enough respect for both themselves and their partner to not act "crazy".
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It's obviously common enough for there to be shitloads of memes and men talking about it online, so.. I would say the average man thinks "a lot" of women are crazy.
And that is reasonable assumption to make. Thing is, both men and women have "crazy" impulses. I can't count a number of times when I wanted to just go off on someone for some stupid shit, sometimes even just existing, sometimes with violence. Men are just better at suppressing it, probably because they are socialized that way since they were kids, while that "crazy" behavior is excused, even normalized for women - just look at your post "normal, average, hormonal", words that you use to describe extremely irrational behavior.
Your conclusion is that men who want to be treated normally and with respect from (presumably) their partners don't like women, or else they would put up with that shit with smiles on their faces.
If you can't put up with a little crazy then I suggest to date a man
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link
I just think many men have decided they don't like or want to deal with women, so they just exaggerate a normal woman's emotions and call her "insane", when actually she is just an average woman with average unstable hormones and they have very low patience or tolerance for it because ultimately they just don't like women and don't want to deal with them.
Do you have any idea how sexist this is?
I've been involved with female mentally ill relatives and friends for a long time, And the sad fact is, IMO, if they don't face their issues with drugs/therapy, if they don't start being honest with themselves, they do end up alone. Whether we want them to or not.
25 year old men want the challenge and glory of being the guy that heals their attractive 25 year old mentally ill girlfriend. 45 year old men don't - they just want to relax and move on from the craziness of youth.
There's a huge problem in the mentally ill female community of telling each other that they are actually just normal women who had the bad luck of being born into intolerant families who can't handle normal female emotion. It's denial.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Yeah the OP is dangerously sexist, brushing mentally ill behavior under the rug as "normal female behavior" I hate that shit. Hold women to a higher standard and stop excusing shitty behavior as just what women do.
[–]Wumpus1Gran daddy purps2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If only more people encouraged accountability for your own actions in society things would very likely be much better.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's just as retarded as saying men can't help but cheat because it's in their nature. Own up to your actions and don't use your gender as a justification to be a crazy asshole.
Own up to your actions and don't use your gender as a justification to be a crazy asshole.
But yeah, also this.
There's a difference between standard emotion and being a crazy asshole. If these people are genuinely behaving in a ''crazy'' way then they might want to get themselves checked out by a psychiatrist, tbh.
It's not ''normal'' female behaviour to act like a total nutcase.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think the OP is talking about actual standard stuff, though.
Like when someone gets upset over their break-up and gets angry at their ex in a proportionate way & people pathologise that.
I understand that women need to be held to a standard of rationality. But we do live in a context where our culture/society makes it easy to view a woman as ''crazy''. And that makes sense, because we're coming out of a fairly recent history of women being institutionalised on a spouse/parent's say so for really, really petty shit (often infidelity) & a more distant history of women being treated for ''hysteria'' when they weren't hysterical.
I know posters here tell me I'm being ''overly emotional'' quite often, when I really feel no emotion at all in the situation. And then they keep going and going with that line -- it's a really easy way to discredit someone's viewpoint, thoughts or feelings.
I acknowledge a few times in this thread that men are way too quick to say "she's crazy" when she's not being crazy at all. One of the easiest ways for a guy to dismiss a woman's behavior is by saying "oh she's just on her period," or something similar.
I have been on my period like, SO many times. It hasn't made me do the dumb silly shit that TRP claims women do. No more than your average male who is also prone to hormonal/emotional changes.
When posters accuse you of being emotional it is because of female stereotypes of women being overly emotional - which is exactly what the OP is trying to say is normal for women.
If we excuse women being emotional for no reason than it basically gives leeway to dismissing all female emotions as unreasonable.
overly emotional - which is exactly what the OP is trying to say is normal for women.
I agree that she kind of comes off like that in OP, but having read her comments throughout, she seems to be saying that men project ''over emotional'' onto standard issue emotional.
She's saying that they do this because they ''don't get women''. I think they just do it because it makes it easy to dismiss women, like you.
The point was a bit muddled. Also yeah, totally agree on the period thing. My period is extremely painful (endometriosis) and it makes me moody like how a sick person gets moody -- ie a touch irritable. If your period turns you into a raging, moody bitch you might have PMDD and you should try and fix that!
25 year old men want the challenge and glory of being the guy that heals their attractive 25 year old mentally ill girlfriend
lol to tell you the truth, I dated this 19 year old girl years back who was a complete fucking nutcase. Bipolar, severe body issues, tried to kill herself, saw her dad kill himself, was raped several times and all of that and much more, and she thought she was ugly despite the fact that she was legit 9/10 and had had more dick in her than there are stars in the universe. She was completelyyyyyyy fucking lost. Last I heard of her she almost died.
Anyway, I dealt with her for two reasons and two reasons only. She was so good in bed(and she was hot af) and her several, severe mental illness made sure I was never bored lol.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Meh. A lot of even legitimately crazy women will have settled down by 45. Many mental disorders peak in the 20's. Even women who have legit BPD or bipolar. Female hormones change age 40 and up and it affects a woman's mental health usually for the better. That's why you don't see many middle aged women being arrested for throwing shit at their boyfriend or taken to mental hospitals and put on holds. Women in their 20's have far higher rates of those things.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
r bipolar. Female hormones change age 40 and up and it affects a woman's mental health usually for the better.
Bipolar is not affected by your hormones (BPD is -- BPD and bipolar are really not the same thing, although rare cases of rapid cycling bipolar might look a bit like BPD). You take lithium until you die.
It also does not cause you to behave in an interpersonally ''crazy'' manner. It creates euphoria and depression. How you act when you're disinhibited tends to be a reflection of what's already there.
Bipolar won't, for example, make you worried a spouse is going to abandon you or make you act insecure, or make you possessive of your boyfriend (unless you're having a psychotic break and you think aliens are trying to kidnpap him from the park).
It's not ''crazy'' in an ongoing, daily way in the sense that men here mean, ime. It's short flares of craziness -- like the time I ran away to a different state without a word and didn't contact my partner for several weeks -- than it is prolonged, interpersonal shit.
[–]AloneOnTheStrange0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You call it "settled down". More likely they learn how to hide it, and only use their destructive behaviour in more covert and socially acceptable ways.
Not really..it has been shown to improve as they near middle age.
However, in the 90% who do not kill themselves, borderline pathology tends to "burn out" in middle age, and most patients function significantly better by the ages of thirty-five to forty. The mechanism for this improvement is unknown. However, other disorders associated with impulsivity, such as antisocial personality and substance abuse, also tend to burn out around the same age.
http://www.jwoodphd.com/BPD.htm
[–]AloneOnTheStrange0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are confusing the way they present themselves to others as an internal improvement. Try telling the people at r/raisedbyborderlines or r/BPDlovedones that BPDs in their 40s aren't so bad (that's rhetorical, don't actually tell them that). Almost everyone there has or has had a BPD in their lives who would act totally normal in public, to therapists, to cops ect. but become shrieking harpies when alone. They continue this behaviour their whole lives and show no signs of stopping.
Even if you can rationalise that as an improvement to the more public displays of crazy in their teens and 20s, such as suicide attempts and anorexia, it's still crazy enough to justify running the fuck away and never looking back.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
that's great news. wish it had happened for pia zadora though.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
When men give relationship advice to other men they tend to focus on negative female traits simply because that is the target audience.. there is plenty of female advice outlets that tell women all about what kind of men to avoid.
As a man that had to call the police 6 times on one ex, and almost was shot over the next one, I find myself cautious of girls that are to crazy
[–]TRP_Hoplite points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Was she your ex before or after you called the police 6 times?
She didn't take the breakup very well
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But how did you come into contact with her after the breakup enough to call the cops 6 times? Me thinks you should've stayed far away from her if she was that crazy and not hung out with her again.
This was over a decade ago, but she knew where I lived and where I worked. She knew my number and somehow magically got a hold of my new number when I got it changed.
Never underestimate crazy
Hey for what it's worth I love crazy girls, they're my kryptonite.
the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!
Kerouac knows your feels.
Crazy men and women keep life interesting.
HIGH FIVE YOU CRAZY BRIT. I, too, love crazy girls lololol.
they're my kryptonite.
They are the only girls in the world my dick gets instantly hard just from smelling their perfume from miles away lolol.
[–]borisisacatNon-Red Pill Man3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link
"Crazy" gets tossed around way too easily. In my honest opinion, it's an excuse for dudes who can't hold their own in a relationship to deflect the blame onto their partner/ex-partner.
very relevant
[–]borisisacatNon-Red Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This! Aziz killing it like always.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
I still remember reading this from /r/askmen ages ago, a lot of the time a guy will use crazy to mean abusive because it's frowned upon for a man to outright admit he was abused by a woman.
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Maybe but I've seen plenty men say his girlfriend was crazy because she got upset he flirted with other women or leered at other women. So they're not always abusive some men just have low tolerances for any type of female emotion.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
she got upset he flirted with other women or leered at other women.
Not abusive but definitely possessive, potentially needy, and a certain red flag for crazy. Would not say crazy based on that alone mind, but a red flag yes.
I think mild flirtation and mild perving are okay.
But leering is never okay. It's socially inappropriate. And if a guy's with me and he's doing that, god am I going to be embarrassed and a bit disrespected.
I feel sorry for other women when I see their husbands doing this. I'm like, ''oh, you got saddled with that guy''.
It's not an overly-possessive or needy thing, imo. I do open relationships well -- I tend not to care if my partners sleep with other people. But this behaviour is inappropriate.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Like 90% of women will get upset or show some negative reaction to that behavior so ..
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
You got a low opinion of women then, I don't think most would get mad just because a guy looks at another women, only the possessive ones will.
Imagine if a man went nuts at his girlfriend for looking at other men... shit that'd already be labelled "emotional abuse."
I'm going pretty light here really.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
guy looks at another women,
She said leering and you turned it into ''looks at another woman''. There's a world of difference between those two things.
We all look at pretty people. But the kind of guy who gawps at some chick's boobs for a long period of time while holding his gf's hand is not a keeper.
I look at a nice set of boobs as a girl walks past just like 100% of the straight male population jfc.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Look vs gawp. The distinction is important.
I look at nice sets of boobs, too.
The distinction is mostly "how much do I feel like judging someone for noticing beauty?" lol.
Not mad but she will express upset or annoyance at least. If not to her guy, she will go complain online or to her girlfriends. Google "my boyfriend looks at other women" see how many are upset over it. Pages and pages of women writing into advice columns and forums about how it's hurtful. It's pretty common for women to react negatively to it.
Google "my boyfriend looks at other women" see how many are upset over it.
All you're doing is proving that bitches be crazy haha.
And all you're doing is proving that you think all women are crazy bitches. If you don't get why women would be upset their boyfriend is looking at someone else, then maybe you just lack the ability to empathize with the opposite sex..which isn't a very good quality. Men that seek to actually understand women do better in relationships and have more fulfilling lives all around. All these men who claim they deal with women only for sex are the same ones who seem to be depressed or have unfulfilled careers, like a majority of trp. You can just feel the sadness.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lol if a girl is gonna get all upset just because I looked at another girl she can go back to her dildo. I'll be honest even the legitimate BPD girls (meaning they have an actual diagnosis) I've been with have not been that bad. So yeah if I'm with a girl and she gets mad over something so petty that's a red flag. She's probably a possessive, needy, crazy bitch. The bad kinda crazy that's no fun.
I like the good kinda crazy girls who instead of getting mad would cut my name into their thigh to show how much they love me ;)
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I think just as often it's an easy cop out - see the link I posted above
It's a funny sitcom clip but in real life I've found there's usually some basis for it, and I'm willing to believe it because you can believe me when I tell you my dating history is full of legit gold plated crazy.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
In my life I've seen it thrown around very casually, and when the guy is asked for specifics you realize he usually doesn't have anything to back it up.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Ask me for specifics bet you I can back it up haha.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I know you can! I never said I don't believe you.
Haha all I'm saying is when a guy says that to me and we talk about it, he can usually back it up as well as I can. So we have different experiences.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I know we have different experiences lol I thought that was clear when I told you about mine. It's an easy way to avoid owning up to mistakes he made as well
Sorry I am super high.
It's an easy way to avoid owning up to mistakes he made as well
True and everyone does this, like when a girl says "oh that guy was just an asshole whatever."
Like attracts like. If you're constantly with crazy women then maybe your mental stability is a bit off yourself. You just wrote that you're high so I wonder if that falls in line with men with substance abuse issues. I knew some men when I was young who smoked weed daily to cover up severe depression or anger issues. Hmm. Weed isn't a terribly bad drug but ingesting a mind altering substance everyday still usually points to mental issues.
Like attracts like. If you're constantly with crazy women then maybe your mental stability is a bit off yourself.
Correct! I literally already said this myself, to you in fact, ITT.
You just wrote that you're high so I wonder if that falls in line with men with substance abuse issues.
Lol you must be new here.
ingesting a mind altering substance everyday still usually points to mental issues.
Of course I have mental issues, the only reason you are acting like this is some ace in the hole is because you don't know this community haha. Anyone who frequents PPD knows this already.
Yes, the reason most of my ex-girlfriends are crazy is because I am also crazy.
However, because I have had experiences with actual crazy girls, I know very well how to pinpoint the signs. I can tell that shit a mile off.
You're giving off many red flags...
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
Men are far more likely to be drug addicts, drunks, fatally violent, or criminals.
How about women not dating these guys (or just rewarding their behavior by spreading their legs for them)? From one of my favorite blogposts of all time...
I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determinism again!) was able to predict number of sexual partners pretty well using a scale with such delightful items as “have you been in a gang”, “have you used a weapon in a fight”, et cetera. An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women. If you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history – then you are the population most at risk of being miserable and alone. “At risk” doesn’t mean “for sure”, any more than every single smoker gets lung cancer and every single nonsmoker lives to a ripe old age – but your odds get worse. In other words, everything that “nice guys” complain of is pretty darned accurate. But that shouldn’t be too hard to guess…
I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determinism again!) was able to predict number of sexual partners pretty well using a scale with such delightful items as “have you been in a gang”, “have you used a weapon in a fight”, et cetera. An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women.
If you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history – then you are the population most at risk of being miserable and alone. “At risk” doesn’t mean “for sure”, any more than every single smoker gets lung cancer and every single nonsmoker lives to a ripe old age – but your odds get worse. In other words, everything that “nice guys” complain of is pretty darned accurate. But that shouldn’t be too hard to guess…
Whoops.
You know what's a fairly good draw for TRP? The fact that this doesn't happen. That you have guys who have cultivated the "stable & dependable nice guy"-persona, which included what Scott mentioned above ("if you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history"), i.e. they're what men - according to women - should be like, yet their love life consists of a long string of failures.
Believe me, I women really agreed on a dating/sex boycott for guys like that and also pulled that through, and broadcast their opinion far and wide, I would really like that.
[–]SmurfESmurferson7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
It's interesting you read the stats that way. There are some red flags buried in those stats:
each extra IQ point MIT grad students men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less
each extra IQ point
MIT grad students
men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less
Looking at those stats, the picture that is painted is that the people who are more likely to be male virgins are also more likely to be STEM nerds who don't enjoy socializing/partying, and/or are preachy religious types.
Those qualities aren't exactly pantie droppers, and they're definitely not what women want.
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Oh, we're aware of that.
But if women complain that all they get is fuckboys and guys who are just plain dysfunctional, then maybe they should reassess their dating criteria.
You get what you incentivize; aka play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
[–]SmurfESmurferson7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
play stupid games, win stupid prizes
I preach that to my single girl friends all the time.
That said, there's a whole range of men between spergy nerd and fuckboi. It's not an either/or.
(Although, if it was an either/or, most women would go for the fuckboi. Women like fun, and we like fun guys.)
[–][deleted] points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women like fun, and we like fun guys.)
hence why all your 'advice' for your girlfriends was just words. play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
[–]SmurfESmurferson4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
hence why all your 'advice' for your girlfriends was just words. play stupid games, win stupid prizes, because reason and logic follow your emotions.
There's a big difference between playing stupid games, and just having fun.
One cries afterwards to her betabux
[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
They don't have beta bux. They're single.
Emotional tampons count
[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Such a weird phrase to use to refer to friends.
Just having fun
😂😂😂
Yeah, that's what they do. I remember this one chick who was trying to beta bux me by trying to come across as a girl who was a nice girl, when everyone knew that chick had had more dick in her than Sasha gray.
I want a man to grow old with and to have a family with - Girl from my past
Who cares what you want LOL this dude ain't no sucker bye bye
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
lol. Here's the thing. Women like to play the higher ground when it comes to morality.
They know how women are but they want to keep men going after them, to commit to them, to listen to them, treat them nice etc etc. Its nothing we can blame them for. Its a man's world, they have make it through somehow.
Now, its up to guys to listen to the advice of women who aren't red pill and to laugh at it because its hella hilarious. They have absolutely no idea what they are talking about 😂
Women love thugs. Women love drug dealers. Women love men they don't have much a future with, so become that sort of guy or don't. Doesn't really matter 😂
Didnt you say you dont give a fuck about rp?
i am a complicated man.
Talk with the chicks, im not a fan of your bulkshit
Muahahaa
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Women should NOT date the cool, fun guys, rather.. they should date "nice" men who call every woman a "slut" with an N above 3.
lol, STEM guys are boring. Women want to have fun and forget they have rent to pay, family weddings to attend - why wouldn't they want a fun guy to get their mind out of things?
Yep. A very religious, teetotaler man who lives for mathematics and has few friends isn't gonna be super attractive.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
How about women not dating these guys (or just rewarding their behavior by spreading their legs for them)?
Sex isn't a cookie that women give to men to reward them, jesus. It's about mutual pleasure.
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Hey, OP complained about male substance abuse and violence.
I just made a statement: if doing so would seriously impede a man's ability to get laid, men would stop doing it. We're really that simple.
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
if doing so would seriously impede a man's ability to get laid, men would stop doing it.
Men need to stop making women responsible for their problems. There is enough social reward, already, for not being a criminal and/or an addict. You don't go to jail! You get to keep your health and your teeth!
We don't need to teach you how to behave via sexual reward, ffs. Women don't need to mother men with their collective sexuality. This is such a strange line of thinking.
(Also idk if you've hung out with a lot of criminal types and/or drug addicts? I have, and no, not because I was fucking them. They would probably still be doing this shit even if they weren't getting laid/women stopped putting out. There's a genetics of addiction and criminal types are often brought up in environments that necessitate that kind of behaviour).
There's a genetics of addiction and criminal types are often brought up in environments that necessitate that kind of behaviour).
My grandfather was a raging alcoholic, my uncles, that dude's sons were complete druggies, bad boys, fucbois, and they went to jail several times, and they were drug dealers. I'm white trash 😂😂😂
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Obviously you're not that simple or men would stop going to church and studying and staying away from drugs.
Men are gonna do what they're gonna do. The alcoholic and the violent offender are not motivated by pussy when they pick up the bottle or a gun.
I think you're just thinking of the guys who are visibly fucked up all the time, and going "duh don't date or sleep With those guys". You don't understand that many functioning addicts and criminals are good at hiding their issues and they just look like normal, sober, law abiding men. You don't realize their issues until you date a while. There is a correlation with functioning addicts/ covert criminals and intelligence, so these men can be very intelligent, manipulative and good at hiding their bad shit.
I don't do drugs to get laid I do drugs because they feel fucking awesome. Getting laid is just occasionally a nice side effect.
How come women here will claim that casual sex isn't pleasurable and that the sex they have with their boyfriends and husbands is much better than the sex they ever had with any other men who didn't commit to them?
[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The fact that this doesn't happen.
But still the majority of them do get laid. Only focusing on them being nice is a bit too simplified (especially considering that being a boring nerd doesn't mean that you are also a nice person)
Don't you think that there might be more reasons for their virginity than just being nice and studying STEM? I'd say the typical engineer personality is a way bigger problem. They are boring elitists without extroverted interests and free time.
That you have guys who have cultivated the "stable & dependable nice guy"-persona, which included what Scott mentioned above ("if you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history"), i.e. they're what men - according to women - should be like, yet their love life consists of a long string of failures.
Ah good old "all women are the same person" logic.
Don't you think that the women that primarily sleep with drug dealers and badass dudes would agree that STEM nerds are too boring and that a man should be daring and confident?
Sure your mother might have said that women like nice guys, but she's not the spokesperson for all women.
Sweet jesus
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/d4/14/b9/d414b9dfd59a23f3f548ab31d9215ba0.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/3f/20/9b/3f209bd3bbd1b5513fa32fd888b28ee1.jpg
😍😍😍
35% of MIT grad students have never had sex,
But those guys are ugly and fat, and lack any capacity to be fun. Why would a girl bother having sex with a guy like that? Lol, you think intelligent men never fucked pussy? Einstein was a total dog, fucking hot chicks from left to right. The fucker had charisma and knew how to make a chick laugh, both which MIT dudes lack lol.
That you have guys who have cultivated the "stable & dependable nice guy"-persona
Dude, seriously. Do you get hard talking to nice girls? That doesn't do it for me. I remember these girls in college who were hot, but they never talked to anyone either than a girl or two, were shy as fuck, couldn't look me in the eye without blushing and were overall so annoying to deal with because you would have to put a lot of work into fucking them, only to discover they are virgins.
Who wants a nice girl? Who wants a nice guy? ITS BORING. I crave excitement. I want to be teased. I want to be denied. I want the chick to throw me a bone. I want her to treat me like shit at the beginning and to treat me better and better the longer she gets to kknow me. I want to woo that chick off her feet and make her snort coke with me under a bridge while everyone else is fast asleep to go to work the next morning 😍
("if you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history")
Really now? Who says that? Their priest? My father never told me that. All he told me when I was a kid was to not be a fucking orbiter(his own words lol) and to not get married early in life, to instead enjoy my life.
He also said son, ''if you ever fuck a fat chick you are no son of mine and you can forget ever coming back home''
legit 😂 Well dad, I'm not that much of a loser so HURRAY 😎
should be like, yet their love life consists of a long string of failures.
Tell those guys to hit the gym, get tattoos, drive drunk while at night, go to jail for awhile then come back and be swimming in pussy. They don't want to work for pussy? TOO BAD.
nooooooooooooo
[–]CarkudoThe original opinionated omega2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
there is a portion of men who think overly emotional women (which are a lot of women..) are somehow awful and need to be shunned and remain single forever?
I think you're conflating an unwillingness to date someone with a wish that that someone should remain single forever.
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I've seen a lot of hate towards these women though, basically with this hateful sentiment that she'll "stay single" even though it's not true and plenty of men are still interested in "crazy" women.
[–]CarkudoThe original opinionated omega2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I've seen a lot of hate towards these women though
No, you haven't. There is not nearly as much hate directed toward such women and their opinions, as there is towards this sub and unsexy men in general.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Assuming the OP is a woman, and you're a man, isn't this a pretty clear-cut case of "I have it worse!" " No i have it worse!"
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Women do have it better in this regard.. if they're attractive. there are plenty men who will date a "crazy" woman if she's good looking. I just find it silly that men on here act as if these attractive "crazy" women will end up single.. frankly it's baloney, probably just saying it to try to make themselves feel better about their own struggle with women and their inability to tolerate anything related to a woman other than internet porn and talking with them online.
I don't know. I think most men date one or two crazy women and then learn to stay far, far away from them.
[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hottest girl I ever dated was BPD
Would not do it again
I would bang her tho
as there is towards this sub and unsexy men in general.
Do you know why? Because those men make women suffer. How can women be happy when men are too lazy to take care of themselves? Why would women want to be unhappy with trash-tier men?
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Towards this sub?
t's not true and plenty of men are still interested in "crazy" women.
That's what i live for, lol. Crazy girls that will hurt me, burn me, make me suffer, break me, destroy me, and then I will rise from the shadows like the motherfucking phoenix
Lmao. This is funny, I have to say.
I'm a funny guy :] It masks severe self-esteem issues and borderline dependence on drugs to make it through the day ;D
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link
Uh when it comes to drunks women are almost as likely to be so. And criminally, women have a higher rate of going to prison than that of men and about damn time too.
I find this is a bit sexist that the manosphere won't acknowledge that a woman simply being an emotional person does not equal "damaged", "unstable", or unfit for a relationship.
Because there's a point where one is too emotional and such is "damaged" or unstable to considered dating.
when actually she is just an average woman with average unstable hormones
I do like how you call the manosphere sexist and you make a sexist remark yourself.
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I work in substance abuse. I'd like to see the data backing up your claims.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5mjj7y/gendered_differences_in_crazy/dc5hxew/
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
WRT the links you provided:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/29/health/women-drinking-more/
Nowhere does it actually state men and women drink at the same amounts, only that the rate of women drinking is outpacing men.
http://www.inquisitr.com/2820041/binge-drinking-rising-rapidly-among-women/
Yes, this outlines significant differences between the drinking habits of men and women. It still does not suggest women are almost as likely to be drunks.
http://www.newsweek.com/alcohol-consumption-drunk-women-men-study-gender-gap-516277
This is the only article that makes the claim that younger women now drink as much as men, and across age demographs men still outpace women in all but the youngest groups.
So, going back to your statement that "Uh when it comes to drunks women are almost as likely to be so." Your phrasing is incorrect--when taken on an average of adult humans, men are still more likely to be drunk. If you would like to restrict this to only include young women--it only further backs up the claim that TRPrs literally do not see unattractive or old women when making their broadstroke claims.
You do realize those articles where from studies that where conducted right?
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Your sentence is grammatically incorrect and the intention is completely obscured.
Nope.
[–]Boobear35 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nope. Statistics say men are far more likely to be drunks.
Recent numbers say otherwise.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
And criminally, women have a higher rate of going to prison than that of men and about damn time too.
TIL. Source?
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If this is true I'll eat my phone
Better start eating.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Did you provide the numbers?
Yes.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Women do not have a higher rate of going to prison, can you read? The already way smaller rate of women who go to prison GREW MORE and the MUCH GREATER male rate grew less. Many multiples more of men go to prison than women still.
In 2016, 6.7% of the prison population was female and 93.3% was male. An increase in the female RATE relative to the male from such a low starting point in no way means more women are being jailed
Women do not have a higher rate of going to prison, can you read?
Too bad they do.
In 2016, 6.7% of the prison population was female and 93.3% was male.
Not talking about total population but of rate.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_incarceration_rate#/media/File%3AU.S._incarceration_rates_1925_onwards.png
Rates
You are comparing the higher INCREASE of the already miniscule female rate to the SMALLER increase in the overwhelmingly higher male rate. The male incarceration rate DWARFS the female rate by many multiples
[–]HelperBot_0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_incarceration_rate#/media/File%3AU.S._incarceration_rates_1925_onwards.png
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 15276
Nope. Read what I posted again. Also get a better source than wiki.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
the source doesnt provide the actual incarceration RATES of men and women
you made the claim that women ar enow being incarcerated at a higher RATE than men. Please provide ALTERNATE incarceration RATES to the ones I PROVIDED. your link says NOTHING about the RATE at which men and women are incarcerated, it says that "Since 2010, the female jail population has been the fastest growing correctional population, increasing by an average annual rate of 3.4 percent. " which is RATE of increase, not actual RATE and "Female prisoners sentenced to more than a year in-state or federal prison grew by almost 3% (2,800 inmates) between 2012 and 2013, while male prisoners increased 0.2% (2,500)." which still doesnt tell us the ACTUAL rate, but only the INCREASE. both rates INCREASED, the male rat eincreased LESS.
THE ORIGINAL male rate is orders of magnitude higher than the female rate, your enumbers do NOT show that women are being incarcerated at a HIGHE RATE than men, but that the RATE at which women ARE being incarcerated GREW more than the RATE at which men are incarcerated
the male incarceration RATE is almost 900/100000 and the female RATE is around 100/100000
the female RATE would have to increase astronomically to get ahead of the male rate
you are confusing RATE of CHANGE with RATE
[–]Frensel0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is this a better source?
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Ok the rate of female incarceration increased while the rate of male incarceration decreased.
But overall men still go to prison at a higher rate than women do - which is why there are more men in jail than women.
EDIT https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=kfdetail&iid=493 this link shows a definition of incarceration rate.
EDIT2: Thanks to u/Frensel for the link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Can you link e to women going to prison at a higher rate? In the US? This seems insane
[–]dakruNeither4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
The only thing I can think would be that this is a reference to the female prison population growing at a faster rate than the male prison population, which I've heard before. But obviously women's proportion of the prison population and likelihood of going to jail are substantially lower than men's, and all this does is make the gap slightly not as large.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
if thats what he meant he is REALLY inarticulate. im going for dumb and wrong instead
lol nope.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
All you showed was a relative increase in the female rate and decrease in the male rate. The male rate is still wildly higher than the female rate from the outset, like many multiples of the female rate
Nope. Wanna try again?
Not really insane when you think about it. Society is holding women more responsible for their actions and that more importantly viewing them more able to commit crimes like men.
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
You said women have a higher rate of going to jail than men. This is not born out by the numbers you provided.
In 2016 12768 women wore incarcerated and 177438 men we're incarcerated. Men are incerated at a rate that is many multiples of the female rate to begin with, and arrested many multiples of a rate than women
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You do understanding what rate as in percentage means right? I am not talking total numbers, but rate here, which women do have a higher rate here.
[–]AliceOxalis points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You're completely off the mark here. Atlas is discussing the rate of prison entrance by gender, you are discussing the rate of change of the rate of prison entrance by gender. You're confusing d/dt for d, #MATH.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I am not off the mark here. Absolute number wise men go to prison more than women, the rate women go to prison is higher as already shown.
the rate women go to prison is higher
False. The rate at which women go to prison is lower than the rate at which men go to prison. The rate of change of the rate at which women go to prison is higher than the rate of change of the rate at which men go to prison. These are two entirely separate concepts. Have you ever taken calculus?
Have you ever taken calculus?
No only algebra/trig.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Where did you get the alcoholism and incarceration statistics?
Incarceration:
Female prisoners sentenced to more than a year in-state or federal prison grew by almost 3% (2,800 inmates) between 2012 and 2013, while male prisoners increased 0.2% (2,500).
The female jail inmate population increased 10.9 percent (up 10,000 inmates) between midyear 2010 and 2013, while the male population declined 4.2 percent (down 27,500 inmates). The female jail population grew by an average of about 1 percent each year between 2005 and 2013. In comparison, the male jail population declined an annual average of less than 1 percent every year since 2005.
http://www.csosa.gov/reentry/news/statistics-on-women-offenders-2015.pdf
alcoholism:
Nationwide over the course of the decade, the rate of binge drinking among women increased more than seven times the rate among men.
Women live with more alcohol [than men], they pre-drink, they have a habit of purging and starting again.
What we found was that the gap between the sexes has narrowed over time. Among people born in the early 1900s, men were more than two times more likely than women to drink, three times more likely to drink problematically and three-and-a-half times more likely to experience alcohol-related harm. Among those born in the late 1900s, the differences had all but disappeared. This means that by the end of the last century, men and women were drinking at almost the same rate.
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
And criminally, women have a higher rate of going to prison than that of men Female prisoners sentenced to more than a year in-state or federal prison grew by almost 3% (2,800 inmates) between 2012 and 2013, while male prisoners increased 0.2% (2,500).
And criminally, women have a higher rate of going to prison than that of men
Do you realize that your sentence makes it sound like there are actually more women going to prison than men? Those are just the numbers that their population grew by from the previous year's number, they are not absolutes.
Here is some more recent data:
The male imprisonment rate in 2014 (1,169 per 100,000 adult males) was lower than in 2013 (1,189 per 100,000). While the imprisonment rate for females was lower (65 per 100,000 female residents of all ages and 84 per 100,000 adult females), the rates for women increased from 2013.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p14.pdf
So even though the numbers are technically getting closer, they are still pretty far apart.
Nothing from even the titles of those articles suggests that there is any real info to show women are more likely to become alcoholics or addicts than men are. It also seems you keep comparing rates instead of absolute figures.
Do you realize that your sentence makes it sound like there are actually more women going to prison than men?
Yes because per rate wise there are. As total population far more men are put in prison then women, but rate wise women have a higher rate.
It also seems you keep comparing rates instead of absolute figures.
Ya because I am talking about rates, not absolute figures here.
Preach it, brother! what's up with these chicks coming here and calling me a drug-addict, raging alcohohlic, huge ass loser?!
I am all that but I also have a name! Call me Julian! LOL
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Maybe because you are one?
I'm more than just that, you know. I'm sweet as sugar 😅
[–]ppdthrowawaiRed Pill1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Mental illness is statistically gendered. Specific illnesses plague each gender at different rates.
[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Depends what kind of emotional Some kinds are OK for a relationship. Other kinds of crazy you don't want to touch with a teen foot pole.
It also depends how much you have to lose. If you are a prole with a criminal record and a dead end job you can have the luxury of getting with crazy emotional women. On the other hand if you have a creer, a business and a UMC lifestyle you simply can't afford do get involved with an overly emotional woman these days because she could bring your whole carefully constructed life down in one moment of emotional rage.
Anyone without tempered virtue is crazy. Both genders should select for eternal positives like loyalty, honor, bravery, strength, restraint, hope, joy and humility. No one will possess all at once but the more the better.
[–]italkiesomuch points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
From what I've gathered, it's a matter of personal responsibility and how one allows the "crazy" to affect others, especially their partner.
There's a huge difference between a woman who recognizes she is being over-emotional and is simply dealing with it versus a woman who feels others should simply have to deal with that because "if you can't handle me at my worst..."
For example, I have a good friend from freshman year of college who deals with anxiety as I do (and has similar symptoms, such as major panic attacks). She does terrible in relationships because she identifies this anxiety as part of her personality, so if someone loves her, in her view they have to deal with her anxiety as much as she does. This also makes her less proactive in dealing with her anxiety. I'm not going to sit here and pretend like my SO has never dealt with me panicking, but I also don't make it his issue to deal with, and I make sure that I am capable of handling these things myself if need be.
TRP unfortunately fails to make distinctions a lot of the time which makes them sound like they paint women with the same brush more-or-less. And some do perhaps! But I think nearly every man at TRP would agree that a woman who proactively addresses her emotional issues is far different than one who does not, even if they both are "overly emotional."
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Meh. If someone has anxiety it kind of does become something your significant other will have to deal with, especially if you're living together. It's not always something people can deal with on their own. Any mental issue or physical issue someone has that affects everyday life is something Your partner needs to be willingly to handle and help you with sometimes, imo. That's just what a good partner does. I wouldn't date a guy if he was unwilling to help me through a panic attack or unwilling to help calm me down sometimes. I'd rather be single than be with someone who just leaves me alone when I'm going through a stressful event. It's almost like a test. If a guy can't help me through a panic attack once in a while (I have them probably 2-3 times a year) then he sure as fuck isn't going to be a good, attentive, caring father. Best to weed them out. I don't want some guy who can't handle some stress once in a blue moon. If he just dips and shuts off and leaves you alonenwhen something stressful happens, do you think he will help raise a child properly? I don't want a deadbeat dad.
Anyway, being with someone who has anxiety usually comes with pros though, and that's why people date them. Anxious people are more likely to be intelligent and even funny. I think it's even been studied. All of the people I knew who has anxiety issues were also very funny. So maybe her boyfriend doesn't mind dealing with it because he gets some other interesting personality traits that he might not get with a non-anxious girl. Personally I'd rather date an anxious guy who's intelligent and hilarious over a calm guy who's boring and kinda stupid.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
.
But how exactly do you know these people have made no efforts to better themselves? What if they have made efforts but it just didn't help? What if their partner is the only thing that helps them calm down? Certain people can come into your life and have a very healing effect.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I think you're not giving the people in your group enough credit. Taking the time to go to a group shows they made an effort. What else do you want them to do to "better themselves"? Quit their jobs and devote their lives to anxiety therapy? Some people also just have worse anxiety than others. There's varying degrees. So maybe the people with very high anxiety have tried different things but it just didn't work, so all they can really do is just deal with it the best they can. And this may include relying on someone else for help. Why's it so bad to let someone else help get you through something stressful? I still don't get it. Self reliance is great and all but if someone cares about me enough to help, then I'll take it. I'm not going to die or anything if I have to go through a panic attack alone, but I would prefer my partner to help me and I don't see why it's an unreasonable expectation of a grown man.
[–]SexyMcSexingtonThe Alpha and the Omega1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I’m not a manospherian. (Is that even a word? Let’s make it a word!) But all I can say is: yeah…so what’s your point?
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I hope to god it's a word because I've sure as hell used it A LOT :3.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They add new words to the dictionary all the time.. It is now
lol
[–]dottywineA Normal Person1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
When they say "crazy" they just mean "My emotional intelligence is that of a goldfish and my SO is very inconvenient for me"
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes.. And They say "crazy" women are illogical, but life isn't perfectly logical.. So what's their point? Sometimes it's chaotic and unpredictable. Their aversion to "crazy" shows they can't handle anything in life unless it's extremely predictable, which means they're weak men who are easily frazzled by any change in routine. Sad. Only confident, truly masculine men can handle it.
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Attention!
You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair, just press Flair under your post!
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]drok007 points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There are plenty of reasons men don't want to date women. Slutty, fat, and crazy are all reasons, you need to get over that and work on yourself.
[–]dakruNeither[M] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This post was reported, perhaps because it sounds like an insult to OP, but I read it as a "generic you" rather than using "you" to refer to OP, so I'm approving it.
He directly called me fat in another thread yesterday so I'm assuming it was directed at me..
[–]dakruNeither[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's a valid reason to interpret this as a personal attack, so I've removed his comment here. Thanks for letting me know.
. Slutty
I'd date slutty.
crazy
Sign me up.
fat
NO THANKS
[–]drok007Not white enough to be blue pill0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, I mean some of that is going to limiting to a lot of people anyway.
haha yeah xD
[–]Candy_Kittens0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The word crazy can mean a lot of things.
[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll give a woman a couple passes on emotionality a month
Hell there's typically one or two days per month where my girlfriend is a total mess, I am okay with that, that's what women do, I've learned to handle it
[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It can be tough for some men to deal with women and it can be tough for some women to deal with men. That's why you see so many men calling women crazy and why you see so many women staying away from duller, more stable men, sleeping with bad boys, or getting married to men who they think are a good fit and filing for divorce eventually. I don't think either gender is inherently better than the other when it comes to dealing with the opposite sex, and some men and women are just better at doing it than other men and women.
In my experience women are better at dealing with relationship difficulties because women are social by nature. They just understand more how to navigate things.
[–]Subway_Bernie_Goetz0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don't know if this is true but the consensus seems to be that women are more likely to have cluster B personality disorders than men, especially borderline p.d. Men are more likely to have dark triad traits, which doesn't really seem "crazy" as much as just evil. Not having a conscience doesn't make you insane.
dark triad traits fall under the umbrella of mental Illness so those men are insane by definition. Not having a conscience is a mental illness and can lead to harming or even killing others.
Seems like men seem to love to point out crazy women and how "unstable"/ "slutty" women are unfit for relationships.
What? What do you mean men love to point out crazy women and how bad slutty women are for relationships? Who says that? Only the old rpers, and those dudes are mormon, boring, irritating, exasperating(you know who you are, dude) and want to go back to the age before feminism.
Nah, brah. I'm good.
Relationships are by design boring. There's nothing in it except fucking the same girl and listening to her prattle about her day and about jennie from the block is a total bitch, and there you are looking at the chick you are dating, noding your head from time to time wondering to yourself when is she going to finally shut her pie hole up so you can go back to playing 60 more hours in a row of Doom. Really, who wants that?
Party girls 😍
Slutty girls 😍
Party girls that are slutty 😍
Sluts!
That's what we want, lol.
Well, let's look at male instability. Men are far more likely to be drug addicts
Guilty of charge https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSdBLAMbpzdvfOMm4VZxd0xYZ5MjndmujAKHUT6hpBATLDDYJH7bw
I drink so much I wonder when they are going to start calling alcoholism my birth name, lolol. Drugs make my life a lot easier to bare.
, fatally violent,
I am hyper-aggressive but only torwards other men. I like to get into bar fights just to see if I can get guys to try and kill me lololol. I also drive my friend's car while drunk, and I like to get into completely dark places with the hope that someone will try to mug me and kill me.
et there is a portion of men who think overly emotional women (which are a lot of women..) are somehow awful and need to be shunned and remain single forever? Odd.
No, the fat, ugly crazy chicks. The hot ones can be sent my way ;D
I find this is a bit sexist
Its a man's world, get used to it LOL
that a woman simply being an emotional person does not equal "damaged", "unstable", or unfit for a relationship
No, it doesn't make her damaged. It just makes her a brat. And I don't put up with brats unless they are so hot my hand gets burned touching that ass!
I just think many men have decided they don't like or want to deal with women,
lol, tell me about it. I really don't like to deal with women. The whole process of getting to know a girl, building something, or simply just trying to fuck a girl is so endlessly exhausting, bothersome and boring. Like, put out or don't talk to me, what's the point?
See, that's not my problem. The fuck I care that she's pmi'sing? She treated me like shit, so why should I bother with her ever again?
and they have very low patience or tolerance for it because ultimately they just don't like women and don't want to deal with them.
Oh, I like women, alright. I just have very low patience or tolerance to deal with women because I see my friends who can be complete douchebags to women and not only do they get that pussy instantly, but girls don't make shit for them to deal.
Whereas, this dude >OncleJulian< has dealt with emotional nuclear warheads from chicks who were having a meltdown, either because their dad used to beat them up as kids, or because they lost their fucking grandma. So... gonna fuck me or not? Lol, when I was young(15-22) I would put up with this shit, even if I wasn't fucking the girl because you know.. guys go through a lot of inane crap to get the pussy or to keep getting the pussy.
Complete waste of emotions, energy, and effort.
Sure. I love women. But guess the fuck what.
I love drugs and booze more than I love women, and drugs have never rejected me or said, ''not tonight I am on my period''
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbm6GXllBiw
HAHA
[–]trpobservereats ass0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Men are far more likely to be drug addicts, drunks, fatally violent, or criminals
For the most part, these are relatively quiet, silent, depressive behaviors that occasionally result in explosive violence and noise.
Men just don't have the "screetchy" crazy that girls have, with the exception of very effeminate men. Men are just typically more calm and quiet. I mean, what do they always say about male serial killers and mass shooters? "He was quiet, mostly kept to himself".
woman simply being an emotional person
I agree, they aren't crazy, they're just being emotional women. I'm surprised you don't consider yourself sexist for thinking so.
I'm an intelligent person who understands the biological differences in the hormones of males and females. These hormones have been studied and there's information all over the Internet about them. If that makes me sexist then so be it. I'd rather be sexist than moronic.
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I find this is a bit sexist that the manosphere won't acknowledge that a woman simply being an emotional person does not equal "damaged", "unstable", or unfit for a relationship. I just think many men have decided they don't like or want to deal with women, so they just exaggerate a normal woman's emotions and call her "insane", when actually she is just an average woman with average unstable hormones and they have very low patience or tolerance for it because ultimately they just don't like women and don't want to deal with them.
And I find that statement abysmally sexist against both men and women.
Basically, you're saying that women are naturally irrationally emotional, and that this is inherent to femininity. And thus any man who does not want to spend his entire life catering to and soothing hysteria is a misogynist. You're presuming men have a duty to be a woman's "rock" and do so without complaint; you're demanding men fit into the role of parent-protector for a giant child.
This worldview is straight out of Carol Gilligan and Cultural Feminism. Its gender essentialist and sexist to the core. You are both misogynist and misandrist for reducing women to hysterical children and commanding men to live up to those traditional gender roles feminists claim to oppose.
I bet you probably criticize TRP for believing that women are "the most responsible teenager in the house," yet your argument explicitly endorses the TRP viewpoint that women are emotionally unstable and need men to protect them.
Of course merely having emotions doesn't render a woman insane, damaged, unstable or unfit for relationships. But some men actually want a relationship with a woman as opposed to one with a little girl and despite what certain fetish sites or (ironically enough) TRP will claim, not all men want to be your Daddy. There is a point where "having emotions" becomes "being a rampant emotionalist who demands all of reality change to accomodate one's feelings."
As many feminists argue, hating "toxic masculinity" doesn't make one a misandrist. I may be an opponent of Radical, Cultural and Third Wave feminism, but I agree with this. By the same token, hating the "toxic femininity" of emotionalism doesn't make one a misogynist.
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Women are inherently more emotional than men due to hormones. I believe in men needing to be stronger than women and being their protectors in relationships. Part of a man's job in a relationship is to be useful to his woman and helping her calm down sometimes. I think many strong men get joy out of this, but maybe not all admit it because some other idiot insecure men will call them "pussy whipped" or some stupid nonsense. But, unfortunately many men are too weak to adequately protect women and calm them down. So they just piss and moan about women being crazy and not wanting to deal with it. This describes many trp's. They're basically just insecure, weak betas who don't have the strength to handle women. Men that have that strength are far superior.
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So in other words, you're a sexist.
You disapprovingly talk about TRPers "hating women" for not putting up with emotionalism, yet your worldview hates women by basically saying they're stupid hysterics.
It hates men too, for treating them as utilities who exist to serve and protect the opposite sex. You demand men "man up" and be "useful to his woman."
Maybe you don't call yourself a feminist; you're certainly a gender-traditionalist and demand the maintenance of female privilege.
I think many strong men get joy out of this.
Men are socialized to shut up and never complain, to be stoic and not express emotions, so how would you know if strong men do get joy out of it? Are you a strong man? Maybe you shouldn't make the awfully convenient presumption that a strong man would feel true happiness from loving and taking care of you.
I think many strong men get joy out of this. Unfortunately many men are too weak to adequately protect women
Misandrist shaming tactic; "any man who won't protect and provide for me is weak, ergo not a real man."
Attitudes like yours drive many men to go MGTOW. Good.
Pretty sure most men are driven to mgtow partly or mainly because they're unattractive. Just search it on YouTube you'll see how these people look. I recall seeing some video of a hideous ginger guy who was really awkward. I'm most likely not going to date a below average, awkward beta man because I myself am not below average, so why would I even care if they're mgtow when i don't want them in the first place?
If a man can have expectations that women should be girly, have long beautiful thick hair, beautiful breasts, be nurturing to men and children.. then why can't I expect that a man be masculine and protective when I need it? I have a right to my own standards, especially if i meet the standards of said masculine and protective man. I don't see why this is sexist, because I don't expect EVERY single man to be protective and masculine. It's fine that some men are weaker or won't protect me.. I just don't want to date them. I'm sure there are men who wouldn't want to date me too, even though I'm called beautiful often, because they want a different type of woman or some other trait I cannot provide. Should I call those men sexist?
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty sure most men are driven to mgtow partly or mainly because they're unattractive.
So? Just because they aren't traditionally attractive doesn't mean they have no right or no legitimate reason to criticize traditional gender norms. Indeed, being one of those maligned by common norms means one is more likely to see problems in those norms.
If a man can have expectations that women should be girly, have long beautiful thick hair, beautiful breasts, be nurturing to men and children.. then why can't I expect that a man be masculine and protective when I need it? I have a right to my own standards, especially if i meet the standards of said masculine and protective man.
Of course you have the right to your own personal standards and preferences, as does everyone else.
Yet you started this debate by saying that Red Pillers must hate women because they have limits in terms of how much emotionalism and hysteria they're willing to tolerate in a mate. Why aren't they allowed to have their own personal preferences?
If your statements about how men 'should be' are merely your own personal preferences, you're entitled to them (that said, you never clearly specified that they were merely your personal tastes). But you should extend the same courtesy to everyone else's personal preferences, and also realize that your personal preferences aren't some moral law that all of society should be structured around.
[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No one likes to deal with instability. Not even women.
It is a different matter that they love drama.
As to unstable men, they would get shunted out of the human race quite quickly but many are alphas, the most prized men as far as women are concerned.
[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Except, men who are drug addicts, drunks, fatally violent or criminals are shunned. Women aren't going around saying that men with these qualities are fit for relationships. If anything, women are doing the opposite. They are not only treating extreme negative behaviours like these as an indicator of a "damaged" man, but are also treating completely normal masculine behaviour as behaviour that is unfit for relationships (ie. "toxic masculinity").
Men and women are different. Their version of "crazy" is different. A man who is overly violent or a drug addict or whatever is likely using those types of behaviours as a means of burying their problems. The idea that men need to bury their problems was, I would argue, created by women. Women are unattractive to men who talk about their feelings or talk about their problems. They see men who ask for help as weak. They say they don't, but actions speak louder than words. Men show that they want "strength" every step of the way. They want confidence (which can be a form of strength) since they require men to approach. They want financial strength since they require men to pay for dates. I can go on and on and on. But essentially they want men who solve their problems and who know how to deal with those emotions. Except, there are problems that can't be solved easily. People often feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. Men are expected to move the rock or the hard place on their own, but often, men aren't emotionally strong enough to move them, so, instead, they accept being trapped and try to forget about it via drugs/violence or other negative behaviours (eg. playing video games 24/7).
Men go through similar problems that women go through, but they are expected to not be emotional. They are expected to keep their mouths shut and either fix the problem or live with it without complaining. Therefore, when a woman is emotional, and when she behaves illogically, men notice it and point it out. Let me give you an example. One time, we went to this friend's birthday party. A guy and his girlfriend came, and the girlfriend decided that she wanted to order 10 appetisers for everyone. No one wanted those appetisers, but she ordered them anyway. Most of them ended up not being touched. When the bill came, she turned to her boyfriend and said "hey, can you pay?". He looked at her and said "babe, I don't have a job right now and money is a little tight. You are working, and you ordered the appetisers, so doesn't it make sense for you to cover it? I'll pay for my and your drinks, but you get the aps, I'll make it up to you later". Her response was "oh, don't worry, I looked at your credit card balance, you have like $200 available, just use that card". We were all watching this happen and looked at each other like "fuck, this bitch is crazy". You see, a man in that position, would not have ordered the appetisers, or if he did, he would have paid for it himself as opposed to forcing his unemployed girlfriend to pay for it.
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
Unstable men are (or at least ought to have been) sorted out from relationships by female hypergamy. Go for the man with a good job, not the drug addicts, drunks or criminals.
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
There are men with good jobs who are also functioning drunks. You wouldn't even know these men are alcoholics unless you lived with them.
But I'm a fun drunk. Not all drunks are angry drunks
yeah, i'm a pretty fun drunk too, lol hahaha.
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Yes, and sometimes hoes make good hausfraus. But not at a statistical relevant rate.
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
The drug addicts and alcoholics you see who are unfunctioning are only ones who have hit rock bottom. There are a good amount of drug addicts and alcoholics who live pretty normal lives.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Yep.
Not that I would know or anything... but like... hypothetically if I did a load of drugs all the time I'd also be able to hold down a job perfectly fine.
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
'Better living through chemicals!'
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Yep yep! That's why I just ordered ten tabs of acid ;)
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
I know someone who microdoses every day. It's an interesting concept...
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
I've read into microdosing, apparently Hofmann himself used to do it and believed LSD was superior to amphetamine for ADHD. Since I can get tabs at £2 each now I might try it and see for myself.
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I do know that the right strain and the right dose (trickier than it sounds sometimes) of MJ can actually help my ADD more than my adderall. I've been thinking I need to try harder to perfect that recipe to help me get more done in a day, lol.
I should look into the LSD thing for ADD more, too.
But life without flavored chemicals uhh.. would be so bland and dark lolol.
m. There are a good amount of drug addicts and alcoholics who live pretty normal lives.
I can't really hold down a job for long, but then again most dudes who are sober can't either LOL.
You wouldn't even know these men are alcoholics unless you lived with them.
Or you seen and dealt with enough drunks to notice one.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link
Why are you pointing out "instability" in males if the post is about crazy people? That's 2 different topics
Most men call women crazy in a very specific situation. That situation is when she is looking for a certain thing out of paranoia and twists little things to fit that view. Like you say a literal, simple statement and she finds a way to complicate what you say as if there is some hidden meaning to it.
I like real crazy girls(most of us do), but not the kind that men often refer to as crazy
I'm actually dealing with a coworker who is one of these people right now, she is on another fucking level. It feels like she actually changes the definition of the words we use to fit whatever she wants. Like I told her that im not interested in a gf at all, she kept bothering me so I decided to fuckzone her and told her that we couldn't be friends because im horny and if we hang out I would try to fuck her. I was thinking this is a win-win, either I got a new fling OR I scare her off and don't have to deal with her anymore. Somehow she twisted this and said she wanted to be my FWB(but said she was gonna bring pepper spray with her??? are u dumb?), I thought in my head "ok but were not actually friends" but w/e. Next thing I know shes tlaking about meeting up at red fucking lobster and i'm like ???. She just uses the word fuck buddy to try and plan a date, as if I would go anywhere with her that didn't have a bed. I swear everything I say to this girl is 100% direct and clear, she not only tries to swing everything to her own desire but she confuses her self and has to ask me all these stupid ass hypotheticals as a result
Men complain about women being overly emotional, but we are complaining because those specific emotional changes aren't based in reality. They are a result of paranoia and overthinking. No man(hopefully) is complaining about emotions that have legitimate reasoning behind them. Men just want women to understand that we do not think about shit, there are no hidden meanings in our sentences, do not jump to any conclusions, all were thinking about is pussy(general pussy, not your best friends pussy) and our next meal
I'm not saying men don't lie, but there's a big difference between looking for lies and taking everything a person says and treating it like it has multiple meanings behind it
[–]IamTheWalkingMenu points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You should prob not do that kind of thing with people you work with esp if it is a good job. I think it's a good rule to have. There's a couple guys in my office that are def good boyfriend material one in particular who is a real winner with a capital W but I consider them off limits because we work in the same firm.
If something goes wrong then it's hard to keep it secret and I don't want everyone knowing all about my life. I guess unless it's not a job you care about.
Just do something to get those guys fired and then you can date them with peace on your mind 😂
Lolol!! I'll pass on that tho. Low drama. That's my goal!
A girl that isn't into drama? 😵
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude, stop shitting where you eat.
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
This comment seems unhinged. The second paragraph specifically makes your mind seem just as complicated as the woman you're talking about. Hmm
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
You can call it complicated(its only complicated because I described predicting outcomes), but its still accurate. God knows what she thinks is going on
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
If you're just looking for sex, it shouldn't be so complicated. Maybe part of you enjoys the drama.
I'm not the one making things complicated
Yes she is making things complicated but you're putting up with it so really you're part of the problem and I think you secretly may enjoy drama. I bet you find yourself in similar situations in the past.
Nope I have never been in this situation or anything like it. Its tough, shes one of those super nice, spineless girls who you are just naturally nice too since they are so nice to you. That and when she sends me semi nudes(hand bras, side booties) she gets to chat with ~horny me~ who doesn't give a shit about anything but cumming.
I got a fanclub of coworkers who also wont leave me alone, telling me I gotta fuck her, I gotta get that dark skin under my belt to prove im not racist etc etc. You know, dude shit
Wow.. You can't just fuck a woman of another race and suddenly claim you're not racist..that's just not how racism works. That's not just "dude shit" that's messed up. In fact I know a man who has been with a black woman and he is actually still very racist against black people. Frankly that person is extremely uneducated and ignorant to say something so crude like that. And I would be absolutely disgusted if I was another race and someone said that about me. Yuck. I hope she never hears that
They aren't being serious. I cant explain this, but men always push other males to fuck as many women as they can, like they live vicariously through you, or maybe they use it as motivation for themselves to pursue more women. I cant really say why, but men have always been this way to me
You might not think its "dude shit", but that's because you don't know how common this is. Men will give others or themselves any excuse to get laid, even if it doesn't really make sense. I can walk into any group of males and somebody is gonna say some shit like that
Maybe its just the way that I look that attracts this type of comment or behavior, but as far as I know any male who looks like he can fuck a chunk of women will hear this type of stuff regularly
This is the way dumb men act. I cannot see any extremely intelligent man saying such a stupid thing. Either dumb, lower class, or both. I guess it's not surprising because there are many stupid people in the world who believe themselves to be smart, for some odd reason.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
. Somehow she twisted this and said she wanted to be my FWB(but said she was gonna bring pepper spray with her??? are u dumb?), I thought in my head "ok but were not actually friends" but w/e. Next thing I know shes tlaking about meeting up at red fucking lobster and i'm like ???. She just uses the word fuck buddy to try and plan a date, as if I would go anywhere with her that didn't have a bed. I swear everything I say to this girl is 100% direct and clear, she not only tries to swing everything to her own desire but she confuses her self and has to ask me all these stupid ass hypotheticals as a result
lol she's legit cray cray, not crazy bro. You need to stay away from that chick, she's trying to lasso you into a relationship lmao.
Yeah this is not normal haha good luck to the fellow
Lol, you just need a dude with balls of steel, try super man :p
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter13 points14 points15 points (40 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming4 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear3-1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TutankhansetamunBlue Pill Man0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TutankhansetamunBlue Pill Man0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Offhisgame0 points1 point2 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LSTW12341 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bonerdude42011 points12 points13 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia8 points9 points10 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheScamr2 points3 points4 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheScamr2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SexyMcSexingtonThe Alpha and the Omega0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheScamr0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑17 points18 points19 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]kunlangeta points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wumpus1Gran daddy purps2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AloneOnTheStrange0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AloneOnTheStrange0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TRP_Hoplite points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]borisisacatNon-Red Pill Man3 points4 points5 points (33 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]borisisacatNon-Red Pill Man1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS4 points5 points6 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson7 points8 points9 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS3 points4 points5 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson7 points8 points9 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson4 points5 points6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter6 points7 points8 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CarkudoThe original opinionated omega2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]CarkudoThe original opinionated omega2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (42 children) | Copy Link
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.7 points8 points9 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]planejaneThree Trench Coats in a Trench Coat.2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear35 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]HelperBot_0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Frensel0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]dakruNeither4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]AliceOxalis points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AliceOxalis points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ppdthrowawaiRed Pill1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]italkiesomuch points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SexyMcSexingtonThe Alpha and the Omega1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dottywineA Normal Person1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear31 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]drok007 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dakruNeither[M] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dakruNeither[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]drok007Not white enough to be blue pill0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Candy_Kittens0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Subway_Bernie_Goetz0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trpobservereats ass0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]IamTheWalkingMenu points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]IamTheWalkingMenu points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lollygagyoSociopathic Fake Flirter3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear32 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boobear30 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link