Men are the most sociobiologically variable gender, the patriarchy was created by women to suit their relative gender rigidity.

Alright, this seems very obvious to me. Patriarchy wasn't made by men. It was the natural outgrowth from women's innate nature. They're far more socio-sexually rigid than men, and significantly less adaptable, their desire to be submissive has always transcended every facet of their life; its not compartmental like men's, where there's a more strong, evident split between various aspects of their behavior. This is largely due to the sociobiological variability of men, e.g, men have larger variances in personality, desire, behavior, achievement, than women, and they have a greater tendency of "splitting" or having different "selves" that aren't so consistent throughout every part of their life.

Women aren't like this. They desire, naturally, to be wanted, consoled, ultimately controlled; they're incapable of being socially or sexually dominant to any significant degree outside of a handful of outliers. "Patriarchy" was the ruleset they enforced to suit their desires, and to combat male variability, and force men into specific roles that ultimately benefited women by loading the struggle of maintaining society onto them while women got to enjoy the fruits of male labor and the benefits of conforming male sexuality to their desires e.g to be defiled, wanted, "werewolf" sexuality where men are supposed to be chivalrous, but controlling, in daily life, and monsters toward women in their sexual life.

The irony is liberal feminism is, on the merits of tautology, is totally right. The problem is that women don't have the sociobiological variability that men have, thus liberal feminism ultimately is unsustainable as they come to resent the kind of men it has the tendency of creating. If women had the same level of variability, this forum wouldn't exist.

Libfems will always refuse to see this, however, because with doing so they'd have to own up to some uncomfortable truths about women that would render the whole project of equal rights between genders circumspect. This would harm men just as much as women, though, so "traditional gender roles" conservatives solutions aren't very appealing to most.

The aim should still be the Blue Pill, the problem is trying to find a way to make it reality, because clearly feminism isn't enough; unlike men women don't possess the ability to change themselves.