TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicide

NerdGuyLol

December 3, 2019

3315 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicide
Author	NerdGuyLol
Upvotes	3315
Comments	239
Date	December 3, 2019 3:20 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e5ikbp/holy_fuck_this_is_a_book_about_teaching_women_to/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/holy-fuck-this-is-a-book-about-teaching-women-to.863650 https://theredarchive.com/post/863650

Comments

[–]The_Great_Sarcasmo 450 points451 points452 points 6 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

An insightful extract from this book :

Kathy Clique was a new hire. A recent graduate with a master's degree in marketing, she was happy to finally leave the academic world and hit the ground running at her first "real" job. Socially outgoing and chatty, Kathy related to her colleagues as though they were personal friends. She started a company bowling team, went to happy hour with coworkers, and was devilishly excited to engage in office gossip.

Upper management liked her energy, initiative, and "people-person" personality. It wasn't long before she developed a close-knit group of followers at work.

Eric Introvert, however, tended to keep to himself. True to the many stereotypes about engineers, he was more comfortable working with data and things than with people. A longtime employee of the company, he had worked his way up over the years from an entry-level position to senior engineer.

It didn't take Kathy long to discover that she disliked Eric. He was reserved, had few friends, and did not participate in company social activities. Likewise, he consistently declined Kathy's invitations to join the bowling team and other such things. Worse, when she expressed new ideas about how to market the company's products, he often criticized her for "overselling" the products' technical capabilities.

In sum, Eric got in her way and made her look bad. So, true to her nature, Kathy began to communicate her dismay to her large circle of friends at work. She complained that Eric stifled her ideas by interrupting and criticizing her during meetings.

She said Eric discounted her perspectives because she was female. To be supportive, her work friends echoed her sentiments and reinforced her negative views of Eric. Empowered, Kathy then took her complaints to human resources. She stated that Eric did not acknowledge her contributions because she was a woman. She said that he spoke "aggressively" and that she did not "feel safe" during meetings with him.

"When HR asked if there was anything else about Eric that made her feel uncomfortable, Kathy added that perhaps he didn't listen to her ideas because he was sexually attracted to her. And now that she thought more deeply about it, she recalled instances when he stared at her breasts rather than making eye contact while she was speaking. Further, when asked if there were any witnesses, Kathy said she had been sharing her concerns with coworkers for quite some time, they agreed with her, and they would vouch for her.

HR confronted Eric. Blindsided, he said that he had no idea what Kathy or her friends at work were talking about and that he related to her no differently than any other employee. He also said he had not violated any company policies, no one else had ever complained about him during his years with the company, and HR had no tangible evidence to support allegations of sex discrimination.

Nevertheless, in order to maintain a safe work environment, promote diversity, and avoid further complications, HR mandated that Eric formally apologize to Kathy and refrain from criticizing her. They also threatened to terminate Eric if he did not comply, informed his manager of what had occurred, and added documentation about the incident to Eric's permanent personnel file.

Rumors traveled fast around the company about Eric's apology and about his disrespect for women. Fearing termination, he no longer voiced his opinions during meetings and retracted his views whenever female coworkers took issue with them. He was eventually passed over for promotion. Kathy was applauded for having the bravery to voice her concerns and stand up to sexual discrimination. She advanced quickly in her career with the company.

[–]Taco-Time 254 points255 points256 points 6 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

[–]The_Great_Sarcasmo 142 points143 points144 points 6 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Having read the book I would suspect that it is actually carefully crafted satire.

Here's another extract.

In a word, these DAMN methods work because women are winning! Moreover, we're doing it by turning male oppressors' own patriarchy against them. Women have gained more power than men while society still operates like we are powerless victims. In this way, women benefit from both the virtues of victimhood and the power of the oppressor. We also do it openly, hidden in plain sight by patriarchy's selective blindness to women.

It's patriarchal society that forever views us as damsels in distress. It's patriarchal society that laughs at the thought of a man being a victim of a woman. It's patriarchal society that defines violence as physical, in terms of beatings and broken bones, but never in terms of allegations and broken lives. Even when studies show that women are just as violent as men when "violence" includes things such as verbal abuse, reputation ravaging, and emotional abuse, patriarchal society still cannot perceive women as aggressors.

Despite men being far more likely than women to be the victims of violent crimes like homicide, men are still perceived as less deserving of protection. Even present-day federal law still requires men, but not women, to register for selective service-the military draft. In other words, with women gaining power in politics, we can send men to die for us in war without ever having to go ourselves! Patriarchy's persistent perception of women as weak is so deeply ingrained in society that it's embedded in law.

So, rather than trying to change patriarchy, women have mastered "societal judo" by leveraging the principles of patriarchy against men. We're defeating our oppressors by turning the captain's command of "women and children first" into "men last" while we sink their ship. In 2017 alone, the number of men we've dethroned from high-level jobs in the entertainment industry, politics, and other positions of power is testimony to how well we're winning. Moreover, we're destroying men's reputations as men so they can never regain power. The word men has become synonymous with rapists, pedophiles, predators, harassers, and the like.

Women are also winning because certain aspects of modern society have evolved in our favor. Especially with the emergence of information technology, typical female advantages such as communication, social networking, and emotional intelligence have become more important than typical male advantages such as physical strength, size, and emotional detachment. As Richard Whitmire (2010, 28) states in Why Boys Fail, "The world has gotten more verbal; boys haven't."

Similarly, education is now key to financial success and power, and it's apparent that school is better suited for women. According to The End of Men and the Rise of Women, by Hanna Rosin (2013), thousands more women than men graduate from college each year, with women earning about 60 percent of all bachelor's degrees. Likewise, women earn 60 percent of master's degrees and earn more PhDs than men (Rosin 2013). Even more uplifting, trends like these are continuing, and nothing is being done to stop them. Along with patriarchal society turning a blind eye, Mary Media ensures public condemnation for anyone who even tries to advocate for "men's rights"-even women!

And why? Because destroying a man now is profitable. As we've discussed, mainstream media profits mightily from scandalous allegations against men. Complaint websites make untold sums of money from the "legal extortion" they levy. Lawyers siphon ridiculous amounts of money from men who are trying to defend themselves against allegations. And women profit from scandalous allegations against men in the form of legal settlements, career advancement opportunities, and the like. Clearly, women's power to destroy a man is stronger than ever, and our time is now!

[–]JamesBCrazy 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]Walaylali 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]UnexplainedShadowban 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]peripeti 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]peripeti 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]peripeti -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Convenient how you didn't quote the full sentence:

Why did they go that far to recognize how women have gained social power...

You're making it look like I implied the author was female, while I actually said, that they (as in neutral pronoun) recognized that women have gained social power.

You don't use "almost self-aware" if you don't assume the writer is a woman.

I meant self-aware as a feminist, not a woman aware about her own social power. If that had been my point, it would have not been almost self-aware, but fully self-aware, because the author has no trouble realizing that. What he or she has trouble realizing is that this power is not caused by patriarchy or toxic masculinity. And that's why it's only almost, regardless whether the author is male or female.

fair and rational open discussion

so mentally twisted

Sure you did.

If you hadn't started your whole argument with "something something brainwashed", I might have given you the benefit of the doubt, but like this it's hard to take you seriously. You're not even making an effort to properly read/quote what I've said.

[–]skgody 40 points41 points42 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]xRisingSunx 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]cyberdecks-and-neon 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]xRisingSunx 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Valariel_Dawn 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Shawn411 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Pirate_Chicken 17 points18 points19 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]meeselbon573 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]peripeti 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Bletchlypark1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Or they just flat out get you fired for no reason but rumors.

Source: that happened to me.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+]Bletchlypark1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Allowed? I mean they can’t stop me. Would taking about it publicly bring me any good, probably not.

[–]Negative_Yesterday 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucius_Martius 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If someone does that to you, then you have no reason not to absolutely destroy their business and personal reputation. It all depends on how much effort you are willing to put into doing it.

If you are able to manipulate your social environment in that way, you wouldn't get in this type of situation in the first place.

I am an introverted engineer myself, so I could empathize with this Eric character. However knowing what I know (that an apology is only a validation of their claims and starts a social downward spiral), I would not have apologized and instead have quit the job right then and there.

As a good engineer, you can pick up at any company, usually even earn a lot more than at your old employer. And an employer giving in to unsubstantiated claims like that is not deserving of my abilities.

[–]PMmepicsofyourtits 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]awkwardtouching1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

The book is obviously satire, but IMO it's meant to illustrate simply why mixing politics with HR policies is dangerous. You are effectively giving two supposedly equal people imbalanced tools at their disposal to handle what would otherwise be average office politics.

Which is a point I bring up a lot to those when trying to explain that feminism is not inherently bad but that it's extremely easy to abuse in situations that have nothing to do with feminism.

[–]galkatokk 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]empatheticapathetic 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]meeselbon573 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]PeacefullyFighting 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

In this situation how would asking to have another male co-worker attend every meeting with her work out, possibly directly from HR be received? Women can ask for this and is often a promoted a promoted action in the workplace workplace for male on female meetings. If they refuse he has a pretty clear cut discrimination case against the company. This is doubled if they refuse the request and he starts documenting the minutes of the meeting and immediately handing it over to his boss after the meeting. Also do everything to prevent the attacker from getting ahold of them while making sure your boss trusts your notes. For example, she claims the meeting/event happened on x day and time but you have documents and your bosses word it was on day y. Those notes taken immediately about the meeting will be used against anything she claims and you've already proven your notes are better than her memory. In some cases I would recommend contacting a lawyer and asking having them help with it. Who knows, they might even do it for a percentage of the payout. Yes, it's a tough spot and will make HR think quick and hard about what they're doing.

PS: It oesn't help that HR is a female dominated industry and those drawn to the job love to get others in trouble. We all know the personality. I'm sure this plays into what we're seeing with the recent corporate assault on men in the workplace.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]xRisingSunx 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TimothyThotDestroyer 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Apolopolo99 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]illCodeYouABrain 97 points98 points99 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]xNOM 29 points30 points31 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]JayPlaysBeamNG 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ithinkoutloudtoo 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]WarOfNoise 29 points30 points31 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]JayPlaysBeamNG 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Kierran169 124 points125 points126 points 6 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

[–]2113iksose3 68 points69 points70 points 6 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[+]1984wasaninsideplot1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (18 children) | Copy Link

I dated a girl for a little bit in college who was a psychology major. Total nut job. Just because they're in mental health doesn't mean they're perfectly sane.

[–]BassBeerNBabes 61 points62 points63 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mar_Ci 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Combatmedic2-47 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]GiJoe0202 -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]2113iksose3 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mar_Ci 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]GiJoe0202 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]BassBeerNBabes 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]skgody 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]GiJoe0202 -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]skgody 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]GiJoe0202 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm currently using my phone so I'm not able to provide a statistical source. Annectodatly, I've worked as a School Psychologst in three separate counties with 10-18 psychologists each and it appears as though 1 of them had a mental health problem (her ex had recently committed suicide on her property...so yeah most people would probably not handle that easily). We deal with other people's trauma on a regular basis. We help with crisis management. Yes those things are stressful but we are mental health providers and that's our job, and it's rather rare. 95% of our job is actually handling things related to special education like IQ testing or designing education plans. While our state's legislation related to special education law might be rage inducing, I wouldn't consider it an overly stressful job.

In both graduate school programs I attended there were not any students in those programs suffering from publicly notacable mental illnesses. I was in a counseling class with a polyamorous pansexual girl for a semester who was struggling with her personal relationships (not to be judgemental but obviously that kind of lifestyle comes with complicated relationships). All and all I'd say of the approxametly 100 practicing professional psychologists that I've personally known, about 2 of them seemed 'mentally ill'. There is probably quite a few who have mental illness that I didn't know well enough to identify myself or be shared to. Let's be generous and say 5 times as many. So that's what 10%? Perhaps that is higher than the general population...but would that warrant me concluding "psychologists tend to have mental illness." I'm not sure.

All I'm saying is that a term like "psychologist" isn't a very effective or reasonable way to generalize personality type the same way using race or sex isnt a very effective way to generalize people. There are usually equal or more within group differences than there are between group differences when comparing large groups of people. I'm open minded, that's not always true. If I find evidence tomorrow supporting either opinion I'll post it. After all anectodal experiences are not great ways to formulate opinions about large or ambiguous groups.

[–]skgody 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lil-Rupees 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+]1984wasaninsideplot1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

tamer story but should have stopped me from going on date 2 with her 6 months later:

she insisted we cook at my place on the first date. we cook, all seems good. we go to the living room to eat and watch a movie. she sees I have a van wilder dvd and freaks out yelling at me and insisting on being taken home right now because I'm a "typical male douchebag". 15 minute drive where she doesn't say one word, gets out, slams the door, and I don't hear from her again for 6 months when she calls to apologize.

2 more fun stories:

"date" 5-6ish, she calls me one morning and asks for me to come over because she's not feeling good. she jumps me, we hook up, etc. Then she tells me how her friend set her up on a blind date the night before, she hooked up with him in the bathroom and after the date, he told her he didn't want to see her again. I'm not happy so I leave.

a couple of days later, she calls at 1 am insisting I meet her at a bar. I decline and get told I'm "the worst boyfriend ever" ...right...

[–]Lil-Rupees 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]1984wasaninsideplot 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Lil-Rupees 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]-Noxxy- 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]GiJoe0202 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]-Noxxy- 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd disagree considering how less than a few decades ago psychologists were adamant that surgeries and treatments reminiscent of Nazi medical warcrimes were the cure and solution to mental illness. Scientific rigor really needs to pushed harder in the psychology field akin to drug trial standards to help prevent the further damaging, mistreatment and abuse of folk with mental illnesses.

Within recent years mental health has been undeniably politicised by left wing interest groups and parties that want mental health identification and treatment to fit into their agenda. Gender dysphoria being unidentified as a mental illness is an example of this. The justification of self destructive behaviour, sexual mutilation, sterilisation of children and the justification of the politicisation of gender without scientific value are some core issues.

Mental health identification and treatment is essential. I don't want innocent folk getting misdiagnosed and hurt because some people with a larger platform than they are deserving of have decided that their agenda comes before the protection and treatment of vulnerable people with mental illnesses. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem, telling people their dysphoria is natural and healthy is only hurting them and preventing them from constructive progress and treatment. I have a handful of friends with diagnosed gender dysphoria at various stages of transitioning, hormone therapy or treatment and let me tell you, I wouldn't wish gender dysphoria on my worst enemy, the shit they go through and the suffering they have internally over their own identity is awful.

[–]GiJoe0202 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a lot to unpack here and I think you raise some very valid criticisms of the field. I'll be back tomorrow with a more substantial response because I think this is a very interesting conversation topic if you wouldn't mind continuing!

Basically I agree with many if your premises but don't necessarily come to the conclusion "therefore psychology is bad." Pragmaticly it provides quite a lot of help for quite a lot of people and therefore I find it beneficial. The same way that while I'm not religious and I recognize there are serious and severe issues that surround organized religion, I also recognize many people are so uncomfortable with death that it is a primarily net benefit on their well being to believe in some afterlife. (Bonus points for community and shared resources and what not). That's basically an anology I'd draw to the way we handle mental health. Lots of problems but it's doing a lot of good for some people.

[–]GiJoe0202 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]skgody 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]GiJoe0202 -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]skgody 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]KaydenD101 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Who is she?

[–]smariroach 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]banana_wagon 139 points140 points141 points 6 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 84 points85 points86 points 6 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 28 points29 points30 points 6 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[+]EverGlow89 -8 points-7 points-6 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 22 points23 points24 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[+]EverGlow89 -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Good Lord this is bad.

Selling (retail) is not the same as publishing. And Amazon isn't even selling it.. when it was for sale, it was through a seller using Amazon as you or I would use eBay.

What's more is that Amazon's listing has the name of the Publisher on the very page.

Lemons to Lemonade Publishing, LLC

Google that - established in 01/18

And then go back to that same Amazon page that says this book was published 02/18

Wanna guess how many books Lemons To Lemonade has published? Correct, just one.

I mean yikes, dude.

I'll really.. simplify it for you.

Write book that makes your opposition look like monsters -> pretend to be one of them writing it -> create Publishing company -> publish the propaganda book -> list on Amazon -> make some popcorn.

Jesus Christ, you can even buy fucking Mein Kampf on Amazon. That doesn't mean anything.

[–]DeanerDean 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]_Last_Man_Standing_ 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+]JustXisting1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what you mean. It is available on Amazon for $2.99. I refuse to buy it myself, but I think we all know that many of the things the OP claims the book teaches are absolutely possible for a woman to do to man with no evidence required. I've seen similar things happen to friends. In this sub, during this week, there have been posts about these kinds of things happening. In the news there are countless examples of men being destroyed by false accusations from women. That is the real problem.

[–]EverGlow89 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]thefilthyhermit 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Im_Justin_Cider 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]McFeely_Smackup 102 points103 points104 points 6 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

[+]ChitankHD1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

Is it really? All the reviews seem to speak otherwise

[–]McFeely_Smackup 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[+]ChitankHD1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

That's good. I'm no longer disgusted

[+]Negative_Yesterday -11 points-10 points-9 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+]ChitankHD1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

You don’t know me. At all. Maybe you shouldn’t judge someone’s entire character based on a couple of reddit comments

[+]Negative_Yesterday -9 points-8 points-7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]BlahBlahSunglasses 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]VicisSubsisto 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]camletoejoe 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]McFeely_Smackup 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Odonata_Anisoptera 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cloudmarshal_ 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]camletoejoe 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]whyserenity 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]motherfailure 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]yeehawdolphins 69 points70 points71 points 6 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]othergabe 64 points65 points66 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[+]DelScipio1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Choose well. Better alone than with crazy...

[–]yeehawdolphins 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]othergabe 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]yeehawdolphins 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]whyserenity 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]yeehawdolphins 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]whyserenity 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]othergabe 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]alvijay 20 points21 points22 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]citerunner 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]othergabe 30 points31 points32 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]thealleycatking 20 points21 points22 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Hirudin 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]GingerRazz 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Hirudin 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]1984wasaninsideplot 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]someone-farted 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pixelies 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DaVinciofDeath 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't know where some of you fellow rights activists are from, but here in the United States things are going downhill fast. If you say the wrong thing in a liberal state, you can suddenly be attacked or a mob shouts slurs at you. The wrong thing that you said/did was something so incredibly petty and stupid. They perceive that opening doors for women means you think they are weak, and they think that simple compliments are catcalling. Meanwhile the overall quality of women has went from at least having some people who aren't toxic, to a bunch of lying, snowflake, sjw, hypergamists that can do whatever they want, and get lesser consequences than men for the same crime. This thing is also worldwide. In Russia, I heard of women throwing ACID at the crotches of people they perceive as manspreaders. This is getting bad, and we need to turn the tables on these villains.

[–]NerdGuyLol[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]rwp80 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]alclarkey 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]XyZ_MaN 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]phracea -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+]anonymous3589791 points 6 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

have you read it? pretty sure it is.

[–]phracea -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Tkx421 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]WarOfNoise 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]genkernels 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]azazelcrowley -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverGlow89 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]azazelcrowley 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Around 20% of them are women (but when you get into the leaders of the movement and the activists you start approaching around 50%.) None are incels, because the ideologies are not compatible. 60% are in relationships, in line with population norms. (See the MRA demographic survey as opposed to the paranoid ravings and stereotypes anti-MRAs have about us.).

You sound like you're a brainwashed lunatic mate, if you honestly don't understand the difference between Incels and MRAs, that's either laziness, stupidity, or propaganda doing its work on you.

Moreover you're conflating anti-feminism and being an MRA, further insight into the jumbled mess your head is, and probably good insight into why you think incels and MRAs are the same. To you it's feminism and The Other, the big uniform group of evil people who are all the same.

When it comes to anti-feminism, it's around 5 to 2 men and women, at around 20% of the overall population of both, about as many people identify as explicit anti-feminists as explicit feminists.

You're not being educated, you're revealing your ignorance and prejudice. You don't know the statistics and you don't know what you're talking about. All you know is you've had your head filled with ideas on how you should suspect the evil menz are behind this, despite having no evidence of it. You confuse indoctrination for education.

[–]EverGlow89 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]vlad0202 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]XyZ_MaN 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DaVinciofDeath 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]CaliFloridaMan 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]GrumpyGayGuy 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I am sorry but I am nowhere near convinced that this is satire. The people stating that it is are probably feminist or feminist supporters. I have seen way too many times that women use many of these tactics to attack the men around them. I myself am working on a Master's Degree in Creative Non-Fiction, and one of the first thing that is taught is to make sure the characters in your book are non-descript and that no real names are given. That is what this book does. It takes real scenarios, removes names and general descriptions of the characters so that no one can retort and say "This character is based on me" and sue.

What is most infuriating is that when men do come forward and share their experiences being targeted like this, it is quickly laughed off and revered as nothing more than satire. I am convinced that men are more oppressed than women in today's society and people are just laughing it off.

[–]n3miD 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Brentobot 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]n3miD 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]deanie1970 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EphemeralWitness 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bitdom8 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]dialecticwizard 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]LockedPages 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AspiringGuru 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Shayde505 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]phracea 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]racerfree 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]SpeedTuberYT 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]deville05 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]racerfree 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]deville05 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]NoBodySpecial51 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]racerfree 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]IdiomMalicious 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Hauntde 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]A5TRON4UT 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[+]Space_Cowboy811 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you should tell that to all the feminists I know who on one hand think men should be more vulnerable then on the other hand make fun of them for male fragility.

[–]A5TRON4UT 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ifreew 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]A5TRON4UT -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ifreew 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]smariroach -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]No_Potential60405 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]InformalCriticism 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]kingkenton 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]InformalCriticism -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]xRisingSunx 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]RedOrbPikachu 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]skgody 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]odiegh 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Silentwes -10 points-9 points-8 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[+]mikesteane1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

The fact that it is not obvious that it is satire tells you why the MRM is necessary.

[+]Silentwes -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]NerdGuyLol[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silentwes -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]NerdGuyLol[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silentwes -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]NerdGuyLol[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Silentwes 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]GermanShepherdAMA 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Silentwes -5 points-4 points-3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]FatherGregoreeee -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Evilcon211 points 6 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Shame we just can’t simply get it banned

[–]camletoejoe 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DanteLivra -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]GlassDeviant 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lethn -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]dilfybro -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[+]mikesteane1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

I never ponder statistics without knowing how they were arrived at? Where does your number com from?

[–]dilfybro -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+]mikesteane1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Not an unbiased source and no information on how they made up their statistics.

[–]dilfybro 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]Mindraker -14 points-13 points-12 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]NerdGuyLol[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter