TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Utah Teacher Who Had Sex with Students and Tearfully Cited ‘Extreme Self-Esteem Issues’ Is Denied Parole

ismyroofright

February 4, 2017
6592 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://www.yahoo.com/news/utah-teacher-had-sex-students-222557923.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Utah Teacher Who Had Sex with Students and Tearfully Cited ‘Extreme Self-Esteem Issues’ Is Denied Parole
Author

ismyroofright

Upvotes 6592
Comments 452
Date February 4, 2017 8:58 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/5s32d6/utah_teacher_who_had_sex_with_students_and/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/utah-teacher-who-had-sex-with-students-and.932671
https://theredarchive.com/post/932671
Top posts by ismyroofright

Omaha mom throws her newborn out the window, killing it. Lied about not knowing she was pregnant. Tells boyfriend about it: "It was a girl, by the way." Down to juvie court and no jail.

258 upvotes
February 17, 2017
/r/PussyPass

Can we take over T_D? It's a total cuckfest over there now. How would this happen?

1 upvotes
April 25, 2017
/r/PussyPass

Comments

[–]darwinsaves 796 points797 points798 points 9 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

Guys, she was just "romping" with them. I'm sure they wouldn't jail a male teacher for romping with three underaged girls, right?

[–]trolloc1 102 points103 points104 points 9 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

If they were girls they'd be legal. Kinda. Not really since shes over 10 years older though just legal for a 26 year old teacher.

[–]HankBeMoody 140 points141 points142 points 9 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

Serious question, does the US not have laws about people in a position of a power? In canada consent is 16 but people like doctors and teachers who are in a position of power are still charged with statutory until someone's 18 (Even after 18 you can still be expected to be fired and discredited from your profession if you hold a position of power)

[–]trolloc1 104 points105 points106 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Apparently each state is different. Mormons make it weird.

[–]HankBeMoody 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ah that makes sense, I forgot how much power individual states had to set criminal laws; up here that's all at a federal level.

[–]StrokeGameHusky 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think it should be federal, and I like the Canadian rules, makes much more sense then 50 different rules. Religion should not be a factor at all.

Canada really seems to handle social issues better than the US 🤔

[–]K1ngFiasco 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Religion should not be a factor at all

Personally I agree with you. But the US was colonized by those seeking religious freedom, so it is very much a core concept of our government. I'm not familiar with Mormonism but if a law could make one of their practices illegal that would violate the Constitution.

[–]HankBeMoody 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't kid yourself; we still have a tonne of social issues, mostly in regards to our native population. What makes us a little better than the US is that we don't think we're the best and constantly strive to become the best while knowing we never will be. A white canadian born citizen just shot up one of our mosques; Canadians are just less reactionary.

[–]assface421He wanted to be assface420... 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's a real trail blazer he is.

[–]prinzklaus 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. Mormons are very anti-sex. So I'd be surprised if the book weren't thrown at her.

Source: ex-mormon

[–]Thehulk666 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, Texas you can goto jail even if the student is 18 or older.

[–]HankBeMoody 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

good

[–]Thehulk666 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you have probably jerked off to worse things.

[–]grodon909 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In terms of age, each state is different, most states have the age of consent at 16-17. Doctors are under regulations and cannot (or should not, but some do anyway) be in a romantic relationship with anyone currently under their care. Psychiatrists are not allowed to be in a relationship with anyone that was ever under their care. Not sure about teachers or other "positions of power" though.

[–]BannedFromImzy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

France has a super low age of consent for instance (15, but in practice it's not really even enforced and you see a lot of 12yo and up fucking older guys), but if someone is under 18 we have very strict laws about anyone who might have some kind of authority (teacher, family, coach...). There's not even a set list of professions : the law states that if someone can be considered having some authority, it automaticaly becomes rape if the victim is a minor.

And even for people over 18, or someone found not guilty in court, if you have authority and have sex with someone under your care, you're probably breaking the rules for your job.

[–]nkei0 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Florida and a few other states, you can have consensual sex with someone under the age of 18 (some legal means exist here) and even though the people involved consented, the parents can press statutory rape charges.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

guy below is right. in my state our laws are similar to what you described

[–]djsumdog 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I remember reading about a UK story that was similar. A teacher had sex with a 17 year old, which was legal as far as age of consent goes, but illegal because the teacher was in a position of authority (specific laws about teachers).

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The girls would have been legal at 16. Wouldn't have been rape. That's what makes this so fucked up.

[–]fraac 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Knew this would be the top comment. What is this nutty movement that thinks men and women are the same? You're applauding ruining people's lives for making each other happy, you dumb chimps.

edit: look at her picture! 100% of the straight boys in her class would've been jizzing GALLONS over her, and you know this or you're deranged liars.

[–]unlasheddeer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not sure this is the smartest way to look at this.... i for one wouldn't want hot teachers discouraged from having sex with their students... It's always a fantasy of every guy

Sure, in some cases male teachers would get unduly labelled rapists even though female students might've seduced them, but this doesn't seem like a male vs female problem.

[–]darwinsaves 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about nobody take advantage of children by abusing the privelege that their taxpayer-funded position gives them? I'm not paying for scumbags to prey on vulnerable teens. Want to fuck kids? Fine. I find it revolting, but if it's legal, you can do it on your own time and your own dime.

[–]CaresLessEveryday 1543 points1544 points1545 points 9 years ago (191 children) | Copy Link

Misspelled "raped"

[–][deleted] 385 points386 points387 points 9 years ago (51 children) | Copy Link

...Holy shit I didn't even notice that glaring omission until I read your comment.

[–]GrahamSaysNO 161 points162 points163 points 9 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

It goes without saying in most cases that when a teacher has sex with students it is rape....most cases don't have that in the headlines.

[–]SadCritters 169 points170 points171 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It goes without saying in most cases that when a teacher has sex with students it is rape....most cases don't have that in the headlines.

Almost all the male ones do though. A quick Google search shows the vast difference between how they handle the headlines.

The male teachers are immediately labeled rapists. The female teachers are labeled "abusers" or "sex scandals".

[–][deleted] 84 points85 points86 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So double standards. Hence the entire point of this sub.

[–]happilydamaged 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She was in a position of power, and trust. She fucked with the minds of young, impressionable kids, for her own sexual gratification. Whether its by physical force, or mind games, it's rape. Fuck that bitch.

[–]fraac 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Their sexual gratification too, c'mon.

[–]jbaum517 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niceee

[–]RampartRange 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]Cryhavok101 55 points56 points57 points 9 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

It shouldn't go without saying.

[–]GrahamSaysNO 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

I'm saying no matter the case, the kid is almost always underage so even if it was "consensual" it was still rape.

[–]Cryhavok101 32 points33 points34 points 9 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

And I am saying that new media shouldn't be deliberately downplaying it by always leaving that word out of their headlines. It should be there, because that is what it is.

[–]buttaholic 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

So what it should really say is "teacher statutory raped student" or maybe even "consensual ly statutory raped"

Because just "teacher raped student" kinda over-plays it

[–]Harvey-Specter 32 points33 points34 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

"Consensual statutory rape" is redundant. Statutory rape is sex with a person who is not legally able to consent.

[–]buttaholic 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

Right but they can still consent to it in a non-legal way, like "yeah let's have sex!" As opposed to the teacher forcing them to have sex while they're all like "noooo!"

[–]OMGROTFLMAO 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

RAPE = RAPE

There is no rape that's ok, no rape that's "not so bad."

RAPE = RAPE

[–]Harvey-Specter 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what? The point is that headlines should say it's statutory rape, because statutory rape is not the same as "having sex with a student".

[–]Cryhavok101 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would probably look more professional as "Teacher found guilty of three counts of statutory rape of students" but yeah, I would be fine with that.

[–]Stunt_Banana 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not really... If we as a society have deemed that it is rape to have consensual sex with an underage person, then we should call people who do this "rapists".

[–]buttaholic 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then why differentiate rape with "statutory" at all?

[–]Stunt_Banana 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fine, drop statutory too, no skin off my dick

[–]fancyleggs 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's just to make it sound worse, then that increases the ability to punish and makes it so you associate violent non consenting rape - like how everyone is a racist nazi lately

[–]ThatLunchBox 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape is forceful sex without consent. Stat rape in this case is consentual sex with someone who happens to be under 18. Regardless of what your moral position is on the issue, they are not the same thing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that's true. At least here in PA, you need to be under 16 for it to be statutory rape. 16 is the age of consent, 18 is the age of legality.

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

what cases are exceptions?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Incorrect.

[–]x2040 202 points203 points204 points 9 years ago (65 children) | Copy Link

30 years in prison for having sex with a 17 year old. If she did it a couple hundred miles west she would be fine (disregarding the very immoral act of sex with a student which deserves unique charges).

I know a guy that murdered someone and got 7 years.

[–][deleted] 125 points126 points127 points 9 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

When I was in 7th grade, a good friend of my BFF's family that used to babysit us and give us rides to the mall and skating rink in her IROC Z28 (this was 1994), was shot and killed by her ex-boyfriend, and we had the privilege of finding her body.

It was totally premeditated. He sat in the driveway of an abandoned house that my dad had an appt. to see that same day because my dad was thinking about buying it as a fixer-upper. That's how we found her because me and my BFF wanted to get there before my dad so we could explore this creepy old house and barn.

He waited for her to leave my BFF's house, ran her off the road when she drove by, got out of his car and shot her in the head. He got a plea bargain that reduced the charge to 2nd degree murder and did about 11 years in jail.

Meanwhile in Utah, obviously mentally ill teacher gets 30 years for banging three students, two of which are of legal age here in Illinois and wouldn't even have been criminal. Fired? For sure. Lose her teaching license? Yes, most definitely. 30 years in the joint? Uh...WTF???

[–]ravageritual points 9 years ago [recovered] (44 children) | Copy Link

Despite what much of the public perception of a "hot" teacher banging her 16/17 year old students is, she abused a trusted position of power and may have irrevocably changed the lives of those children (by law, they're still kids) forever. Thirty years seems just fine from where I'm sitting.

[–][deleted] 76 points77 points78 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

she abused a trusted position of power and may have irrevocably changed the lives of those children (by law, they're still kids) forever

An abuse of power doesn't, especially when the "kids," may have been willing participants, doesn't warrant 30 years.

They may have been minors but whether or not they were willing participants in this should hugely factor into the sentencing. Assuming they were willing participants, 30 years is obscene.

[–]ravageritual points 9 years ago [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link

Well, that's where the Judge and I disagree with you.

[–]bullsi 81 points82 points83 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No its where the rest of the logical world disagrees with you and the judge....

[–]digitag 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, right. It's not that she is innocent, just a desire for proportionality. 30 years in prison would be a sadistic punishment, for someone sleeping with 16/17 year olds. Even if they're students and regardless of gender. Though I'm sure she won't serve that.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the judge who was elected in the ultra conservative state of Utah.

Again, we don't know the impact of what happened has had on those kids (who would be of legal age in many other states), but 30 years is disgusting.

[–]gryts points 9 years ago* [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

If you don't want to go to jail for 30 years, just don't have sex with your schoolchildren. What's disgusting about that?

[–]GullibleGilbert 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you don't want to go to jail for 30 years, just don't steal candy from the store. What's disgusting about that?

[–]digitag 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's crazy that somebody could essentially lose their whole life for sleeping with three 16/17 year old students. Yes she abused her position and yes what she did was wrong. She will never work as a teacher again, she has been shamed and already had her life ruined. It's not like the choice is "she goes free or gets 30 years". Just pick a more reasonable sentence.

Some people seem so keen to punish people beyond what is necessary because, y'know fuck them right. It's sadistic and a complete waste of public funds.

[–]gryts points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

It's crazy that somebody could essentially lose their whole life for sleeping with three 16/17 year old students.

No it isn't.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you don't want to go to jail for 30 years, just don't have sex with your schoolchildren. What's disgusting about that?

This is a perfect example of a strawman/loaded question argument.

Strawman definition: misrepresenting a person's argument to make it easier to attack.

Loaded question definition: asking a question that has an assumption built into it, and can't be answered without appearing guilty.

  1. These are not "children." These are people who would be of legal age in the majority of states. They are minors, but saying a 16 year old is the same as a toddler is simply not true.

  2. They are her students, which is why she should be fired and forbidden from ever working with minors again. There's a number of ways a teacher could interact with students that would lead to their deserving to be fired and never work with minors again, without requiring or deserving any prison, much less a 30 year sentence.

She is absolutely guilty of a crime, but manslaughter doesn't even carry a sentence for as long as she got. This was basically statutory rape and an abuse of power by a teacher. To say that statutory rape is the same as a violent rape with an unwilling victim is disingenuous.

[–]gryts 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They are children, sorry. Just because a state says 16 year olds can have sex doesn't mean they are fully matured human beings. Every teacher knows that they can't have relationships with students or else you are fired and will go to jail, it's not a surprise. So when they do it anyway, that's their choice.

[–]boondockspank 62 points63 points64 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Are you female? Because most males, myself included, would not be fucking scarred for life if we had sex with an attractive teacher when we were 17. 30 years is pretty ridiculous for this when fucking pedos who fuck CHILDREN get less time.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Nonsense. Most males, including myself would be scarred for life as much as the 16-year old girl who gets scarred for life. Get the drift? Double standards is a very insidious thing indeed.

[–]CactusCustard 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

From the picture I'm seeing, I'd totally fuck this teacher. 3 years ago, I'd definitely fuck this teacher. In high school, I would want to fuck this teacher. In fact I'd go as far as to say that intercourse this woman in high school would've made me feel like a baller. Now I'm not saying these boys are the same as me, but the sex was consensual. They wanted it to happen and actively particiapted. These boys are not too young to make their own decisions, and i find it VERY hard to believe they view this as any sort of trauma. 30 years in this case is definitely overkill in my opinion.

[–]Aint_not_a_dorkus 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I was one of the dudes she fucked it would scar me more knowing that she's in prison for thirty years... Its honestly a ridiculous sentence. Less for murder.

[–]Glitsh 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of this

[–]boondockspank 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure if you're sarcastic or not. There should be different standards for men and women bc they are different beings. Not to say one is better than the other but they have very unique attributes. This situation would be much more emotionally damaging to a female than it would to a male. I get sick of this "We must treat men and women exactly the same!" bullshit. Men and women aren't the same and it's not a bad thing to admit it.

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait are you actually arguing for pussy passes to be ingrained into law on /r/pussypassdenied? Like, really?

[–]alarumba 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I disagree that such a situation would be more damaging to a female than a male. There are emotionally weak boys that can easily be manipulated into situations they want to take no part in that can leave them scarred, and there are confident and/or naive girls that would be quite excited by the idea of sleeping with an attractive teacher. We're suitably precious about girls as we should be, but boys don't really matter since the teacher saved them from jackin it. Boys will always be horny boys, the female teacher clearly wasn't thinking straight and needs a second chance. Male teacher? Abuse of power, off with his head.

It's not a bad thing to admit men and women are different, it's just unfair when we're allowed to think this way. Choosing between understanding biological differences versus uncompromising equality seems to change depending on the agenda.

From the article:

“I think she took advantage of each of the boys and what issues they may have had, whether it was their family or drugs or that sort of thing,” Ortega said. “I think she took advantage of that and she made their problems even worse. And on top of that, they had to deal with the public scrutiny of a lot of people saying, ‘You are not a victim because you are a boy.’ I think she layered on the impact with these boys.”

‘You are not a victim because you are a boy.’

[–]Jimbeamblack 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed only if we pull that along into what men/women pay for health insurance as men don't go as often or cost as much

[–]Alphonso_Mango 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're talking shit. If you can't understand why, i suggest you are not male or you dont have any mates.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well everyone can only speak for themselves, But I actually somewhat DO believe in the double standard. I'm 29 and don't feel significantly mentally different than I did in my late teens.

I somewhat do believe in the double standard. Perhaps I would regret the fallout and drama of this situation after it blew up, but the sex alone would come nowhere near "scarring me"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You appear to have missed the whole subtext of my comment - men and women are different, and that's just plain biology. The double standard lies in the fact that people are more willing to accept that male children will just enjoy it whereas female children are scarred for life. Well, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Society is fucked if it assumes that only one sex is affected by sexual abuse (yes, this is sexual abuse of a minor by an adult). It's more a reflection of the ridiculous duplicity when it comes to the law and its societal interpretation by people.

If you say that you feel no differently from how you felt when you were a teenager, I'd say that either you are indeed at the same emotional/mental level, or perhaps you just have not noticed the difference- it's all a continuum after all. There are always exceptions, of course.

[–]stationhollow 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And you think girls just dont like sex so they would be scarred?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thirty years seems just fine from where I'm sitting.

Covered in Cheeto dust on a big ass soapbox?

It's an abuse of power, but not one that deserves a life sentence, especially when people who actually murder people do less time than that. They are minors but in over half of states in the US they are at or above the age of consent. There are more than twice as many states in the US where the age of consent is 16 as there are states where it's 18. Get off your fucking soapbox, fake ass moral crusader.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but everything is relative, would you agree? She may have altered their lives, and sure a punishment is probably deserved, but to get more jail time than someone who committed premeditated murder? That's a bit ridiculous. That's a life ended on purpose, vs someone who gave in to temptation.

Let's also be clear, it was 16/17 year olds. Not 10/11 year olds. There are many places in the world where a 30 year old can fuck a 16/17 year old and it's perfectly reasonable barring the whole power dynamic of a student/teacher thing.

Did she do something wrong? Yeah, I'd say she abused a position of power. Did she do something absolutely heinous? No, not really. What if the kid's were 18 and still in high school? Does 1-2 years really make that huge of a difference? Honestly, the most life altering part of that is the attention brought to it via legal action if people knew who the students were who reported her.

And this isn't really something I'd say is gender specific. If a 30 year old male teacher banged a 16 to 18 year old girl I'd say the same thing. As long as there is consent then it's not a really big deal, although they should lose their ability to teach.

[–]bullsi 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yea she changed their lives forever....those 17 year Olds are getting non stop high fives from here on out, you're right lol

[–]keystorm 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I suspect having sent her to jail for live was more live scarring than the sex.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Found the village idiot.

[–]kylenigga 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

....mentally ill? U serious faqqot

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feels so bizarre for me since 16 is legal here. The whole abuse of a position of authority thing comes into it bit Is not worth anything near 30 years.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She will NEVER DO 30 years!!!!! It said 2-30 years do you understand how badly she'd need to fuck up in prison to stay the max of her sentence? She'll be out in 2 guaranteed.

[–]The7thNomad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The issue there is inconsistency in American states

[–]Logicalrighty 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To me it's the other way.

Her getting 30 years is fine. However your babysitter's killer should have gotten life/gas chamber.

[–]ha7on 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or you could say friend. Reading bff I just think your 13 old girl.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, Friend of mine ran over a drunk on the road while drunk at 4:30 in the morning back in 1981 and it didn't even go to trial.

30 years is steep. Get real, maybe two years. Where the two boys traumatized and turn into cowering sissies. Same as for men, really 10-15 years for screwing a 17 year old.

Canada gives about a year maybe two usually for such a naughty offence where it was consensual and probably made both smile.

[–]Deadpuddle36 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Flip the genders and see how your comment sounds

[–]DynamicDK 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At 16 or 17 years old, even flipping the genders it is insane. 30 years? Fuck no. Sure, a couple of years, MAYBE...but it isn't like they were 12.

[–]OniTan 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Age of consent in Canada is 16, but 18 for a teacher to bang their student. Maybe it's lenient because it would be legal if they banged a random 16 year old who didn't go to their school so they're only being punished for abusing a position of power. Sentences are also fairly lenient in Canada in general.

[–]cros5bones 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Happened at my high school. The teacher in question quit her job. Student got high fives all round- teacher was fine as. The age of consent here in NZ is 16 so it broke no laws but it was a definite violation of the school's policies toward the student-teacher relationship.

[–]mrcaptncrunch 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

who pleaded guilty two years ago to sexual abuse after having sex with three underage students

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok but his range for years in prison was probably something like 5-25. (Completely bullshitting). But hers is 2-30 years. She will NOT do more than 2 bet your life on it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How on earth did you get upvoted in this subreddit where literally no punishment is too harsh if the person has a vagina?

[–]Cyrodiil 38 points39 points40 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Hijacking your comment.

From the article:

Altice, 36, pleaded guilty to three counts of forcible sex abuse in April 2015. In exchange, 11 charges were dropped, including three first-degree felony rape charges, according to local reports.

Looks like rape charges were dropped. Not saying she didn't rape them (she did) - just explaining why that word probably wasn't used in the headline.

[–]AthenaOverAres 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Honestly. People bitch about others, nearly always men, getting called rapists before conviction. The same standards should apply.

Yes, I understand the difference between 'alleged' and charges being dropped due to lack of evidence. The point still stands. It's dumb to argue for only calling somone a rapist after the court has decided and ignoring the legal outcome for a man versus a woman.

[–]Cyrodiil 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like I stated above, she clearly did rape them (making her a rapist). I was merely pointing out why that word (most likely) wasn't used in the headline.

[–]supercatus points 9 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

My rapist pled guilty to 2 felonies, 2nd degree sex abuse, in order to have the 3 1st degree rape charges dropped. He was sentenced to 30 days, and only served 27.still a felony because I was a minor and he was in his 30s, but not rape, because he said I wanted it and that he was sorry. This shit happens all the time.

[–]nidrach 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Were you two in a relationship at the time? 30 days doesn't sound like the dark alley kind of rape but more like the "30 year old boyfriend I seeing at 17 with parental consent" kind of one.

[–]MrEctomy 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Was it though? I expect a torrent of downvotes for even suggesting such an insane thing of course, but why do we feel this way? Have we really already forgotten what it feels like to be a 15-17 year old boy? Because I sure as hell haven't - and I sure as hell fantasized about several of my teachers, not all of whom were as attractive as this one.

[–]patrickkcassells 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this.

IMO its not rape if the student is completely into it and testifies as such.

however, in the light that it is an adult taking advantage of a young person, it should still be illegal

it kind of confuses me why people think its rape. its not legal, and its not right, but its also not rape.

[–]lordlicorice 79 points80 points81 points 9 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

I mean, come on. They were 16 and 17. I doubt she had to do much to persuade them to have sex.

I'm not saying it wasn't (statutory) rape but at the same time it's understandable that they didn't use that word.

[–]Doristocrat points 9 years ago [recovered] (17 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever read a story of a male teacher just "having sex" with a 16 or 17 year old female student? Teenage chicks are just as horny as teenage dudes, it's up to the teachers to not take advantage of that.

[–]Megneous 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem isn't that people are glossing over the "rape" of a high school boy. The problem is that people consider consensual statutory "rape" to be anywhere near comparable to the actual victimization of someone unwilling to have sex.

Like seriously. Legally, my first girlfriend raped me. Did she actually rape me? Of course not. And comparing that kind of consensual situation with actual rape victims/survivors is really disrespectful to those people.

People are capable of deciding for themselves if they were victimized without others telling them they were in order to advance their own agendas. Statutory rape is often a victimless crime.

[–]Trigger_Me_Harder 38 points39 points40 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever read a story of a male teacher just "having sex" with a 16 or 17 year old female student?

Yes

[–]_pulsar 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Link one...

[–]hobozombie 40 points41 points42 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Link one...

Yawn...

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/ccsd-teacher-accused-of-having-sex-with-a-student/472244136

http://www.wafb.com/story/29974396/broadmoor-high-school-teacher-accused-of-having-sex-with-student-released-on-bond

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/former-rancho-teacher-sentenced-for-sex-with-student/459886387

http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/210385925-story

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/2016/10/26/ex-teacher-sentenced-jail-sex-assault/92727060/

[–]_pulsar 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you.

[–]Ryuubu 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are stories not in the internet

[–]-Badger2- 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://triblive.com/local/allegheny/11878702-74/cinefra-sex-guilty

http://6abc.com/news/fmr-north-penn-teacher-accused-sex-with-student/1696597/

I was curious, so I did some searching, and it actually looks like most of them just say "having sex" rather than "raped"

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In b4 u/doristicrat asks for a link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. The funny part is that these imbeciles who come to such discussions and trivialise the whole matter need to be shut down.

The whole point is that equality means equality for men and women. If a 16 year old girl gets her male teacher in trouble while she herself is absolutely absolved of any responsibility in it, so should the same apply for the boys and the female teacher who raped them (well, as per the law).

In fact, these apologists remind me of "moderate muslims" - never say a word against ISIS, but question the religion behind the terrorists, and they instantly get defensive. Ridiculous, really.

[–]Iwillnotreplytoyou 50 points51 points52 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

You wouldn't let male teachers have sex with 16 year old girls. Maybe I am wrong and you might be a parent who would let a grown man fuck rape your 16 year old daughter the same way you would let a grown woman rape your 16 year old son.

[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 50 points51 points52 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I know you're right.

But I just can't see it that way. I can remember being 16 and I'd have gladly fucked the shit out of that teacher. I tried on multiple occasions to fuck my dance and Spanish teachers.

Bruh I just can't view it as a rape.

[–]Chinaroos 35 points36 points37 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You're right. It's not forcible rape.

This is not a case of two consenting adults in love. Teachers are authority figures. There is a power imbalance that can impact not just that student but other students as well.

"Yeah you failed that test, but eat me out tonight and I'll bump you up to a C. Maybe a B if you do a good job."

Maybe the kid dosen't want to eat anything. But maybe (s)he will--not because they want to, but because of the implication.

Would it be OK for a boss to do this?

Or a caregiver?

That's why this kind of shit is illegal.

[–]TeHSaNdMaNS 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree that it should be illegal. But I'm not aware of any mandatory minimum sentencing and in cases like this the judge should be able to take into account the circumstances. I don't think sex with a 16-17 year old(even a student) is worth up to 30 years. I'd be interested to hear from the victims. Especially since I don't know a single friend from Highschool who would have felt victimized by her sleeping with them. Though the fact that she had sex with one of the boys after already being arrested and bailed out is out of this world stupid.

[–]Iwillnotreplytoyou 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think sex with a 16-17 year old(even a student) is worth up to 30 years. I'd be interested to hear from the victims.

Did you even read the article? After she was arrested and relased on bail for having sex with a 16 year old kid, she went out and got caught fucking a 16 year old kid. That is sexual predator status right there. That is why she got 30 years and that is why she isn't out on parole.

tl;dr read the article, not just the headline

[–]jeegte12 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

it's not illegal for a boss to have sex with a worker. that's not why this is illegal.

[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is illegal if you have a dangerous job. And having or not having sex with you could result in them being safe or unsafe.

But that's the only instance in which I can think of it being illegal.

[–]jeegte12 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Could you give an example?

[–]-Badger2- 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Okay, I'll call those cases when that actually happens "rape." But is that what happened here?

For the rest of the time when it's somebody asking "wanna have sex? Sure." it's pretty difficult for me to categorize as rape.

[–]Chinaroos 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Arguments about the age of consent aside, a sexual relationship ruins the student-teacher relationship, as well as the student teacher relationship of other students.

My favorite teacher was arrested my senior year in high school for exactly this. He was one of the most passionate, effective teachers I have ever had. He also had a little cult following of girls who hung on his every word and would often stay after class to discuss books and stuff.

Eventually it was discovered he had sex with one of his admirers.. She was 18 or just about so as far as she was concerned everything was OK.

It wasn't.

When the allegations first came out, classes basically stopped. We could talk about nothing else. This guy was everyones favorite teacher and he was accused of what? With who? It was inconceivable.

A lot of students blamed the girl. Her friends blamed her for sleeping with their idol. His students blamed her for getting her arrested. It was an ugly time at my school and for a while nobody could concentrate on anything else.

This happened right before graduation. The teacher who inspired me more than any other could not shake my hand when I graduated because he was in jail.

Imagine the gossip that would follow this girl for years because she fucked one of the schools best teachers. The relentless teasing. The bitterness from other girls who were jealous that she got to him first. The loss of a great teacher who probably had to deal with lawsuits from an angry parent while in jail. The hours of education lost because teenagers love a good scandal.

All because they (and I say they because she was 18 and technically an adult) couldn't wait a few more months until graduation when nobody would care about who fucked who.

You are totally correct that this is not raping someone at knifepoint in their car. Or slipping them drugs so they can't say no. But there's a reason why students and teachers having sex is just plain wrong regardless.

[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know and I get that, really I do.

But still it's hard for me to view it as bad.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's because you're an idiot.

[–]Megneous 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Yeah you failed that test, but eat me out tonight and I'll bump you up to a C. Maybe a B if you do a good job."

Maybe the kid dosen't want to eat anything. But maybe (s)he will--not because they want to, but because of the implication.

Would it be OK for a boss to do this?

Or a caregiver?

Is there any evidence that that's what happened in this situation? Because if not, then you're being disingenuous and purposefully misleading by bringing it up.

[–]Iwillnotreplytoyou 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are 13, 14, 15, 16 year old girls that want to and try to fuck teachers too. Statutory rape is not violent rape, it is having sex with someone who is below the age of consent.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are an idiot. Just because women show their sexuality differently does not mean that they're any less hornier. In fact, having been in co-ed schools my whole life, I can safely say that teenage girls are exponentially more hornier than boys, just displayed in different ways. Does that mean that fucking a 16-year old girl is not rape? Well, it's considered so. Therefore, if the law is indeed equal for all, fucking a 16-year old boy should also be considered rape. Don't be facetious.

[–]MrEctomy 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Call me crazy, but maybe the sexes are biologically and sexually distinct from one another and the dynamic between a male student/female teacher and female student/male teacher are vastly and obviously different. But I guess that goes against our contemporary societal narrative.

[–]Iwillnotreplytoyou 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you not understand how it is unethical for a teacher to fuck a student? College professors will get fired for fucking a student because people in authority shouldn't fuck people they have power over.

[–]Megneous 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You wouldn't let male teachers have sex with 16 year old girls.

Yeah, I would, as long as that sex is consensual. Gender is irrelevant, and you're a bad person for thinking that it should be relevant.

Statutory rape is sometimes traumatic for the younger person, especially in situations involving coercion (in which case it is technically no longer consensual), but it is very often a victimless crime. Legally speaking, my first girlfriend raped me. Did she actually rape me? Of course not. And I'm fully capable of deciding if I was victimized or not, as are all the other high schoolers you see in the news. Other people demanding that they be victims even if they don't consider themselves victims is seriously fucked up.

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I would likely call for those teachers to be fired, maybe even struck off the teachers register. I wouldn't expect them to serve 30 years in jail.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I mean shit, I would've been ecstatic having sex with a hot teacher even at 15. Even if you wouldn't, is 30 years in prison a just punishment for fucking someone who'd be legal just a few months later. Hell, in 31 states, both kids would've been legal. The 17 year old would've been legal in 39. 30 years in prison for that??

[–]ismyroofright[S] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Think of deep shit the guy in this case is in. She was only a few "months away" from legal.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know you already know it, but don't feed the trolls. These same cunts would be planning to murder a man just because he slept with a 16 year old girl, and yet here they are trying to divert attention from the issue.

[–]-Lo_Mein_Kampf- 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Victims"

[–]Cityman 608 points609 points610 points 9 years ago* (69 children) | Copy Link

This is kind of sketchy and grey. I say that because, although she should definitely lose her job and be barred from teaching ever again, the age of consent in Utah is 16 for a girl and 18 for a guy.

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/utah-age-of-consent-lawyers.html

So while she did commit statutory rape, it was only statutory rape because they were boys and not girls.

EDIT: Turns out it is rape because the teacher is 36. And in Utah if you're more than ten years older than the minor, it statutory rape regardless.

[–]HeavyMetalSauce 330 points331 points332 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Wow. That is strange.

[–]ridik_ulass 129 points130 points131 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That is hugely strange, I have never seen age restrictions that way around.

[–]jest3rxD 116 points117 points118 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I live in Utah and I had never heard of this. Super fucking weird. Probably tied to weird early Mormon marriages.

[–]d0dgerrabbit 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen a few areas where there is a difference based on gender.

[–]SibilantSounds 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's probably for religious reasons or stems from some ancient pioneering rule where population was needed.

Or good old fashioned irl patriarchy.

I know that some states in the south have even bigger gaps between ages of consent between boys/girls, where boys are allowed to have sex younger than girls, and vice versa.

Along a different line, sodomy/anal sex is/was outlawed in some southern states basically to make life more difficult for gay people.

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points46 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Mormons dude.

[–]in-site 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Utah is kind of full of weirdos regardless of their religion. I don't see any relationship between this weird statutory rape system and the Mormon church

[–]tslime 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's weird that there's two different ages of consent, that doesn't seem right to me.

[–]avenged24 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So while she did commit statutory rape, it was only statutory rape because they were boys and not girls.

Actually according to your source the gender does not matter since it says anyone under 18 cannot consent to someone more than 10 years older than them.

[–]Cityman 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. Good point. Didn't catch that.

[–]Provaporous points 9 years ago* [recovered] (27 children) | Copy Link

Why is the are of consent lower for girls? The only reason I can think is that girls mature faster than boys on average but still...

[–]sinkephelopathy 260 points261 points262 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Mormons like em young.

[–]quackkhead 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

BYU - Bring'em Young University

[–]glqalo 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Genuinely thought this is what it was the first time I heard it from a kid in my school (UK), he was heavily into rap so I thought it was some rap thing. Turns out he was a Mormon and it was a Mormon thing.

[–]terminalthree 88 points89 points90 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Utah has a lot of Mormons, you know the religious folk who have a history of polygamy and lots of religious other laws that make little sense.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I'm still not sure if soaking is a thing or not but that's mostly due to me being too lazy to Google it

[–]TEE_EN_GEE 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

WTF does soaking mean?

[–]chaos_nebula 53 points54 points55 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Here is a visual

[–]TEE_EN_GEE 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

OMG how did I not know this was a thing? Thanks for the laugh, I needed that. Back in my day we just used God's blind spot.

[–]Cryhavok101 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a mormon and I didn't even know about that. I know people who would rationalize that though, so I'd believe it.

[–]NewYorkCityGent 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean God's Loophole?

[–]iamafanofsecretriver 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Grew up LDS and now live in Utah, never heard of that. Smells like bullshit honestly.

[–]ShowALK32 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Where even did they get that? As a Lutheran I don't recall ever seeing that verse in... anywhere at all.

[–]Kayakingtheredriver 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If you didn't know, even though the new testament says this is the last book or somesuch and their will be no others, and even though the mormons proclaim to be christians, they wrote a new book, and it is the real last one, not the other one that thought it was the last. Oh, and they could totally prove it too, but decided to destroy the sweet golden tablets, because when you have ancient holy relics that can absolutely prove the veracity of your beliefs, it makes sense to destroy that evidence. I mean, it is about faith, not proof, after all!

[–]SpiritofJames 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it is the real last one

ex mormon here. This part isn't right

[–]Kayakingtheredriver 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Umm, since you don't see any other people purporting to be christians, writing a new book, then yeah, it really kinda is. I am not saying it proclaims to be, I am saying by default, it would be, because no one else is stupid enough to try that and claim to be christian.

Not a christian btw, if that matters.

[–]ShowALK32 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Mormons be craycray.

...Note to self: don't say "X be craycray" ever again.

Also, I speak this from experience. I "dated" a Mormon girl in 6th grade who was a year older than me. She gave me a Book of Mormon for... some occasion. I had no idea what it was so I started reading it and was like... "wat." It reads like some kind of bad Bible fanfiction.

She has since unfriended me on Facebook because she just couldn't believe I was saying somebody could vote for Trump for reasons other than racism etc.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's like steeping a tea bag in some hot water. except instead of a tea bag it's a penis and instead of hot water it's a vagina. it's not sex if you don't move in and out!

[–]in-site 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is 100% false, like saying Christians believe "God hates fags." like no one thinks that, no one ever thought this was ok

[–]in-site 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that's so offensive and ignorant

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I had to guess, some lawmaker or other important person's son got arrested/convicted of statutorially raping his girlfriend, so the lawmaker(s) went on a crusade to protect their sons from impractical rape laws.

I think it's practical to make the age of consent 16 as long as the partner is within 10 years of them; it's just weird that the age of consent is 18 for males in Utah.

[–]Casteroftroy 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

My reference guide: http://cdn.niketalk.com/1/16/16d2a3ab_know-your-ages-of-consent.jpeg

[–]MickeymousetitdirtTop score holder at meatspin.fr 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The fact you even have such a thing that you call "my reference guide" makes me feel you really need to start dating people your own age.

[–]Auszi 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you just assume his age? Maybe he's in that age group and wants to be safe.

[–]wannabepizza 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Se you new to the Internet? This chart is always posted on these threads lol

[–]Casteroftroy 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's meant as a joke

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoa there bucko.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right, because I'm sure he made it and has it hanging on his wall and didn't just google it and post the link to it as a joke for karma.

[–]aakksshhaayy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

haha california 18 what a backwards state

[–]spyson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You understand that even if they say 16, it doesn't mean that at 25 you can have sex with a 16 year old and it won't be against the law right?

Most of those 16 states have different rules where if you're over a certain age than it's against the law.

[–]ql3 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

30 years is insanity for something that will have absolutely no lasting impact on the boys involved. The articles says that the prosecutor said the sex had a “really substantial impact” on the boys, but doesn't give a single example. I mean, what could the effect be? "Because I banged my hot teacher, I fell into a deep depression"? What a joke.

The solution to insane sentences against men isn't insane sentences against women. The boys consented, but the law chooses to ignore their consent. It is a legal fiction that minors cannot consent. Of course they can, the law just says, oh, you're 2 weeks shy of 18, so we're going to pretend that you're unable to give consent.

Anyone who thinks this warrants the woman essentially forfeiting the rest of her life has no business being in a courtroom except as a defendant.

[–]shadowkhas 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The boys consented, but the law chooses to ignore their consent. It is a legal fiction that minors cannot consent. Of course they can, the law just says, oh, you're 2 weeks shy of 18, so we're going to pretend that you're unable to give consent.

Well, as a society, we draw lines where people at certain ages get certain rights/allowances granted to them by the law. You may not agree with it, but the laws are there and created by our elected representatives. The answer is not "give them a few weeks grace period" on something that has a cutoff point of 18 years old, for example. The answer would be to change the law to say that the cutoff point would be 17 years and 48 weeks of age.

[–]MemoryLapse 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't disagree with the jail time, but regardless of the gender, 30 years seems like a really long time for statutory rape with a 16 year old. The minor wasn't 8; nor was it forcible.

[–]Doctor__Butts 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, as a society, we draw lines where people at certain ages get certain rights/allowances granted to them by the law. You may not agree with it, but the laws are there and created by our elected representatives.

Ah, the ol' it's-okay-because-it's-against-law

[–]ql3 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

52 weeks in a year, mate, not 50.

[–]x0y0z0 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least someone makes sense in this thread.

[–]DoktorSleepless 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now I kind of feel like this is an injustice, not a pussypassdenied.

[–]Unsure_if_Relevant 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also when it a position of teacher over a student there is another level of advantage taking goingon

[–]the_unseen_one 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think most rational people can agree that American statutory rape laws are retarded. Although I am happy this woman got punished in a similar fashion to how a man would have been punished in a similar scenario, ideally I think neither should be punished. The age of consent should be much lower, arguably as low as 13.

[–]shadowkhas 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The age of consent should be much lower, arguably as low as 13.

Go ahead and lobby your state representatives, then.

(You won't get far)

[–]spyd3rweb 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think adults, particularly the religious conservative types, refuse to accept that teenagers are normally sexually active, so they enact these zero-tolerance laws to as a form of burying their heads in the sand by making the problem go away and to enforce their morality on society.

I was a teenager once, and can definitely say that most people, even as early as 8th grade (13 years old) were having oral and penetrative sex. The state should stay the fuck out of peoples lives unless an actual victim presses charges.

[–]aarghj 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, persons in utah cannot consent to sex with persons in position of authority or special trust over them. That applies to any age.

[–]SkinBintin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How weird. The bit I find odd is the claim of significant issued caused to the victims during her offending. Here in NZ, age of Consent is 16. I actually lost my virginity at 16 to a 28 year old teacher I met on Yahoo! Chat from a town an hour or so away. Definitely didn't cause me any issues, and I very much wanted that result and went out of my way to tempt her into it. Would be kind of fucked up if it was in a part of the world where that would have been illegal and she'd have been locked up for it.

And yeah yeah, I know. I was a manipulative cunt back then.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she is a rapist there, but is she was 150 miles East (Nevada) it would have been okay. Now that is some grade A bullshit, just get it together and make the age of consent a federal law!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]oh_no_aliens 139 points140 points141 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Female teacher to underage students: "She had sex with them"

Male teacher to underage students: "HE raped them".

[–]eouaoe 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

in this case, the teacher is guilty of "forcible sex abuse". The rape charges were dropped. hence, the article cannot say she raped them.

Altice, 36, pleaded guilty to three counts of forcible sex abuse in April 2015. In exchange, 11 charges were dropped, including three first-degree felony rape charges, according to local reports.

[–]IUsedToBeGoodAtThis 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Eh, brock Turner is still discribed as a rapist everywhere. IIRC, he wasn't charged with rape.

[–]eouaoe 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you are correct. he's not guilty of rape. he is convicted of "three counts of felony sexual assault" instead

Brock Turner was charged initially with rape, but that charge was withdrawn by prosecution.

1.) Rape of an intoxicated person. (withdrawn).
2.) Rape of an unconscious person. (withdrawn).
3.) Assault with intent to rape an intoxicated woman. (guilty).
4.) Sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object. (guilty).
5.) Sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object. (guilty).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Turner

[–]gimpwiz 140 points141 points142 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Obviously she has self esteem issues - who the fuck wants to have sex with high school kids?

I don't think "self esteem issues" get you out of jail, though.

[–]fuckinwhitepeople 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fuck.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Shit.

[–]Unidangoofed 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Stack.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you.

[–]Blurry12yo 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure she does have self-esteem issues, she's earned them. She's a shitty person. We all hold her in low esteem.

[–]Honorable_Sasuke 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Idk, I've fucked many highschoolers (in hs) and they all made me feel like shit about myself smh

[–]jspliff1 points 9 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

"I was having self esteem issues and they made me feel good"

"Had sex after being arrested"

Bitch wtf

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's trying to sound like she is is the victim

[–]Wignation666 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk the statement she admits fault and says she wasn't healthy mentally. It's no excuse but it's a reason.

[–]stationhollow 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Low self esteem is not a mental illness. Its like saying you tried heroin and it made you feel good thus you're mentally ill. (Not talking about addiction)

[–]drugsuser 58 points59 points60 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

i understand statutory rape, and do not think this woman's actions are excusable, but even still I always wonder why the underaged party's pov is never even touched upon in these articles. I wonder how the kids feel about these things in retrospect.

[–]IUsedToBeGoodAtThis 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You can convince 5 year olds to think hating Trump or Hillary is their opinion.

That is the fundamental reason kids are treated differently than adults. It doesn't matter what they think they think or know. A mature human can convince them anything was their idea.

It's why so many child abuse victims are so fucked up and conflicted.

[–]Syagrius 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You can convince 5 year olds to think hating Trump or Hillary is their opinion.

I wonder what the threshold for this kind of inception is? How easily could someone manipulate a fully grown adult into particular political views.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on brain development, and that's not fully completed until early 20s.

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see what you did there. Changed the subject. Brilliant!

[–]jspikeball123 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apparently in America there is no upper limit

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny that that has to be explained to someone that is presumably an adult.

[–]resinis 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"You can convince 5 year olds to think hating Trump..."

Most 5 year olds can tell if other 5 year olds are assholes.

[–]SexistFlyingPig 30 points31 points32 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Pretend that it's a 12 year old girl and her beloved uncle. He rapes her. It's statutory and she doesn't say no. She loves him. She testifies to this in court. But then, when she's 20, she looks back on it and realizes that he emotionally manipulated her. That by abusing his position of power over her, he made her think things that she knew weren't true.

That's why the opinions of the child aren't taken into consideration.

[–][deleted] 62 points63 points64 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

These weren't 12 year olds being groomed by an uncle though. I knew a girl in high school who told us in explicit terms what she wanted to do to our basketball coach. I also had an ex GF who told me how she tried to seduce her music tutor in HS, and it was NOT subtle. In both cases the men were smart enough to not take the bait, but if they had I agree they deserve to get in some trouble. On the other hand I'd hardly see those girls as victims if they'd gotten what they very deliberately set out to get. Both were otherwise sexually active at the time and in no way coerced into doing what thy did.

[–]Kirstae 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I think /u/SexistFlyingPig is correct. I remember when I was 16/17, horny as fuck, doing stupid things I shouldn't have but back then I didn't see an issue with it. Now I look back and cringe at my vulnerability, how easy I was manipulated, just like those boys have been. They might laugh at it now and enjoy it but they probably won't in the future. In the future they may remember the slimy teacher who manipulated them into sex or took their virginity. Just because they are physically ready for sex doesn't mean emotionally and mentally they are.

This woman also continued to have underage sex after she was arrested. She knew she was doing the wrong thing but continued to do it? That ain't clever.

[–]Puttah 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We don't suddenly stop making regretful decisions at 18 though.

[–]Kirstae 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course not, but the law is there to help protect those under 18.

[–]shamwoahh 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But you are graduated and she is no longer a teacher holding a position of power over you.

[–]Megneous 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pretend that it's a 12 year old girl

First of all, the gender is irrelevant.

Second of all, the story is not about 12 year old children being groomed by a family member. They're about high school students having consensual sex with a hot teacher.

I would have had sex with a hot high school teacher when I was a student.

I have a few friends who did.

My first girlfriend was over the age of consent and I under.

None of us were raped. It was consensual, and we're almost 30 now and stand by those decisions. The idea that because some kids can be coerced into sex, therefore all are coerced into sex is blatantly wrong.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Girlfriend =/= teacher with authority

[–]Minitell 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look at the before picture of her in the article. I would imagine they are pretty chuffed with themselves, I sure as hell would be if I banged her at 16.

[–]OneHundredBigMacs 300 points301 points302 points 9 years ago* (44 children) | Copy Link

You people are heartless. Even if this is rape it's statutory rape. While I don't agree with he actions and I belive she should be pushed, 30 years in pretty excessive.

Might I remind everyone that both parties consented to this act. They were practically adults too.

You guys are saying this woman should have the same punishment for what she did as someone who forcibly raped some 12 year old kid. That's not right.

You guys are so hell bent on equality that you're not even considering if the punishment is fair.

Also for the record I'd argue the same defense if the teacher was a dude.

Edit: All you guys are missing my point entirely, i completely understand how the courts are biased and all the shit, which I don't agree with.

My point is that the punishment doesn't at all fit the crime. I'd argue the same is the teacher had been a male and the "victims" female. I belive some punishment and a bar from teaching is in order but 30 years is way over what I would consider justifiable considering the "victims" were practically adults and it was consensual.

Also for the record u/rekabis ,I'm a dude.

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, her criminal behavior was excessive. Prosecutors dismissed 11 felony counts which included 3 first-degree felony rape charges (life sentences!). And while you're inclined to relax because of the statutory aspect, I'll remind you that the three counts she pled gulity to were forcible sex abuse which are second degree felonies with sentences of 1-15 years each. So she could have gotten 45 years. And let's not forget that this chick, while out on bail awaiting trial, bangs one of them a couple more times and texts her titties. Oh, and let's not forget that she also tried to get the cases dismissed by claiming she was the victim. She may be decent looking, but she's an incredibly stupid and bad person. Any idea what her kids and husband have had to put up with since mommy has been in the news?

Considering she's already up for parole after 2 years, she's highly unlikely to serve anything beyond 4-6. For this train wreck, that would be getting off light.

I hope you'd hold me to the same standard if I'm the handsome 35 year old teacher banging your fifteen year old daughters in a forcible way (and, of course, they'd secretly like it) including hooking up with them some more when I'm out on bail, claiming it's their fault, and crying at my parole hearing two years later.

I don't think there is a legal definition of 'practically an adult.' And, teenage girls consent too, and that is rarely brought up as a mitigating factor.

You guys are saying this woman should have the same punishment for what she did as someone who forcibly raped some 12 year old kid. That's not right.

Forcibly raping a 12 year old can get you a life sentence, so nobody is saying that.

You guys are so hell bent on equality that you're not even considering if the punishment is fair.

I'll never apologize for being hell bent on equality. It's the right thing to do. But there are things I just can't personally do. For example, for equality to work the laws would have to be exactly the same in every state. For equality to work the laws would need to be enforced and tried equally in every state. For equality to work, people have to actually try to achieve equality without making excuses for gender or how attractive someone is or how much the 'victim' wanted it or that the 'victim' was practically an adult. In this story, at list this woman is actually being held accountable in a way that is approximately what we would expect to happen with a man. Contrast that to the Haeli Wey case where she was banging one kid for sure (multiple times), another kid in all likelihood (at least playing around). She just agreed to a plea deal of 10 years probation with deferred adjudication (which means if she successfully completes probation, the conviction will be removed from her record), and will not have to register as a sex offender. Her sentencing hasn't actually happened yet, so the judge may surprise us with some jail/prison time, but it seems highly unlikely at this point. How often do we read about male teachers getting that kind of nonsense sentence? Unfortunately, with women, it's common place.

If this woman is truly remorseful and actually figures out what she did wrong and is committed to never doing it again, then I would agree that 30 years would be extreme. But she seems to act like an adult child (which isn't rare in women, btw), so I'm not sure her mental faculties will ever allow her to get anywhere beyond feeling sorry for herself. So who knows. All I know for sure is that before she was incarcerated she acted like she could do anything and get away with it.

I feel much worse for her husband and kids than I do for her.

[–]eouaoe 46 points47 points48 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

she got convicted with 3 counts of "forcible sex abuse" with multiple students. each count is 10 years.

compound it with the fact that she "also confessed to having sexual encounters with one victim, a 17-year-old boy, after she was arrested and out on bail." - the court ain't gonna look kindly on that.

[–]OneHundredBigMacs 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I highly doubt it was forced. if you read the article it says one of the boys was bragging about it to his friends.

[–]shamwoahh 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When I was in highschool all the girls liked one of the young science teachers and probably wanted to fuck him. Had the teacher actually had sex with one of the 16-17 year old girls you would probably call for blood.

[–]DerangedDesperado 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You people are you so sheltered that you couldn't possibly think someone could be fair and balanced? Sometimes it's hard not to believe the average redditeur has poor understanding of other people and poor social skills.

[–]Megneous 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It wasn't actually forced. She merely pled to 3 counts of forced because 3 counts of forced comes with less jail time than 11 counts of statutory or whatever she was charged with.

It's an issue of minimizing time in jail, not actual guilt.

[–]chchCheese points 9 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

Most of the people in the sub are just bitter neckbeards that get satisfaction everytime something bad happens to a woman.

[–]Domin8rDutt 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's what literally this sub is devoted to lmao

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No it's not. It's about women being held to the standard they rightfully demand. You're apparently too stupid to know that lmao

[–]maeschder 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It devolves into that most of the tine though.

In this case for example, people shouldnt advocate for her to be called a rapist, because thats a gross exaggeration no matter the sex of the teacher.

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It devolves into that most of the tine though.

Okay. I'll take your word for it. That isn't what the sub is about though.

In this case for example, people shouldnt advocate for her to be called a rapist, because thats a gross exaggeration

We disagree. There is a difference between forced and non-forced rape. And most people seem to think if someone is a 'rapist' that it was automatically forced rape. But technically that's not true. But even in the statutory rape case, the age difference here is pathetic. Worse, while she was on the hook for multiple felony first degree rape charges she pled to 3 forcible sexual abuse charges. I don't know what, if anything, was forced. But it's pretty clear this woman was way out of control. And I have no problem calling her a rapist. Because she is whether you agree with the law or not.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but a lot of us are just sane people who want the law to be equal. Biased apologist cunts like yourself are wont to turn anything into a sexism issue, so we don't really give a flying fuck about what you think. Perhaps this really is not the right sub for you - you must be getting triggered day in and day out.

[–]lordjigglypuff 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You sound a lot more triggered than the op. Just because your alone doesn't mean you have to take your frustrations on random internet strangers.

[–]Furl_1 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]__TheSillyRabbit__ 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A 15 year old is not practically an adult. They can't even have a license to drive at that age. And their 'consent' really isn't a consideration. And while 30 years may sound excessive (and I agree that it does suck) it really isn't out of line in my view: they eliminated many first degree felony rape charges and other charges; it was possible she would have four separate trials; her behavior before incarceration was despicable; and her sentence starts with 'at least 2 and up to 30 years'; so stop with the 30 year claim as if that's all there is to it. My view is that if she had been contrite and cooperated she would have either gotten smaller sentences or the same sentence with a number of years suspended. I believe it's her own despicable behavior that had the judge sentence on the harsh side while opening up parole very early. That way, if she continues to be an idiot, they just keep denying parole for 30 years. That's a much better incentive that suspending a large amount and then having to bring her back in if she continues to be a sexual predator.

[–]rekabis 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Also for the record I'd argue the same defense if the teacher was a dude.

Unfortunately the courts do not. Having a female’s sentence set to the same standards as a man’s sentence (for the same crime) is very, very rare, hence the shock at this news.

You guys are so hell bent on equality that you're not even considering if the punishment is fair.

Third wave feminism is pounding the drum of female equality as hard as they can, without any regard for men’s side of the equation. Is it really any wonder that some of us will be heartened when the Law Of Unintended Consequences strikes like a sledgehammer to implement true equality?

Even if this is rape it's statutory rape.

You seem to know very little of how the courts utterly destroy the lives of men who have been convicted of statutory rape. Not that I condone rape of any kind, just that your blatantly sexist double standards are bleeding out like Marie Antoinette after the guillotine took her head. Rape is rape, the sex of the perp should never factor into the sentencing, however men are convicted by far much more severely for the exact same crime. Up until the last decade or two, women typically weren’t even arrested, much less charged for rape of any kind - the male victim was invariably laughed clear out of the court rooms and police stations as being “not a man”. This post is notable for the very reason that a woman is actually coming close to achieving the same sentence as a man for the exact same crime.

And for true equality between the sexes, this is a very positive thing. With true equality should always come equal responsibility -- and here we have one of the early shining examples of it.

[–]OneHundredBigMacs 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For starters, I've said multiple times my stance would be the same if the teacher were a male.

Secondly,, if you honestly belive all rape is equal than you're a fucking dumbass. Pardon my language but honestly. Compare these two.

Teacher, 36 has consensual sex with male, 17.

Predator, 50 has forcible sex with child, 12.

So rape is rape? They should get the same punishment.

Read my edit for info on what my whole point was, that you clearly missed.

[–]snpaa 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Teacher, 36 has consensual sex with male, 17.

Predator, 50 has forcible sex with child, 12.

See this is why people think you have a gender bias(and you do). Why did mention the gender for your first example and then decided to be gender neutral for your second example?

Also who decides if it's forcible sex or consensual sex ? The courts or the victims?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh, go fuck yourself, you hypocritical bleeding heart.

[–]rekabis 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I share the same sentiment, but nothing is gained by attacking the speaker. The problem we have here is the speaker has a severely misguided idea of how the legal system actually works or is currently working, and we need to correct her on that point. Simply calling her a hypocrite is not going to change anything, as she just doesn’t understand how she’s being so blatantly hypocritical and sexist. See my post as an example of attacking the message and not the speaker.

[–]OneHundredBigMacs 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm being hypocritical when I've said multiple times I would keep my stance if the teacher was guy. I'm not sure you know what hypocritical means. Also I'm sexist, again with the whole if the teacher was a guy thing...

Do you even comprehend what you read?

[–]0owatch_meo0 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Spot on, the contents here are not about fairness and justice, they're a weird kind of revenge.

Feminists continually fall into the same trap.

[–]Bestialman 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Might I remind everyone that both parties consented to this act. They were practically adults too.

Underage cant give consent. Plus, she was a teacher in a position of power. This is unnaceptable, that's it.

[–]OneHundredBigMacs 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They cannot give consent in the eyes of the law. In all other senses of the word they consented.

[–]NMEChachi 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

As satisfying as it is to watch the female perpetrator getting equal justice to a male one (thus far) this story more than most of them really highlights how utterly absurd our age of consent is. All three of those teenagers are legal in almost every Western country, and it's not America having it correct and all the others being "immoral." When you say a 13 year old can be tricked into wanting something he actually so strongly doesn't want that it'll be traumatic later, I'm a bit skeptical, but in some cases, sure. 14, you're taking cases to an extreme rarity. No 14 year old I've ever met, let alone myself at that age, is so reserved, manipulable and blissfully unaware of what's going on with themselves and the world that they could not under any circumstances confidently state that they wanted sex. By 15, it should be universal. Excessively innocent kids having shitty parents and shitty schools refusing to educate them about sex is a problem that should be resolved by law, instead of putting a bandage on the greater problem (the sway abstinence-nut Catholics hold on public education) at the expense of...well, anyone the 17 year olds are attracted to

[–]feluto 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All three of those teenagers are legal in almost every Western country

Make that almost every country

[–]NMEChachi 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True, in some of the other countries it's so much younger it goes even past reasonable lol

Italy's is 14, I think, which is like the bottom limit for what I'd ever consider ok

[–]Roshambo-RunnerUp 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

To all the people that say the teenage boys are 'happy/proud if they got to fuck the hot 32 year old female teacher (which may be true) .... Why do you think the teenage girl isn't happy when a 32 year old male teacher fuck them?

Girls mature faster and typically have much more social intelligence in their teens then boys do. They might like it even more than the boys! Stop thinking that teen girls are little princesses made of sugar and spice and everything nice. They are more promiscuous and aggressive today than the boy are ffs!

My point is that, the sentencing is too tough for the adult women AND men.... And let's stop thinking that women are always the victims in these types of sexual situations. They are not.

[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 62 points63 points64 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

She's fine as fuck.

God I hate these cases I know it's wrong but I can't help but think shit I'd have been one happy ass little dude.

[–]fartuckyfartbandit 30 points31 points32 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As an adult I see where it's wrong due to the power dynamic, but when I was that age there were teachers that I would have loved to fuck. If I was a little horny 16 year old boy, I would have fucked this teacher and I don't even think she's hot.

[–]teamshred[🍰] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude she's smoking what are you talking about she's not hot

[–]NMEChachi 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I completely disagree that that's wrong at all. It's perfectly fine for kids at that age (adults to most people) to be attracted to her and vice versa. America's AoC is artificially inflated by the prevalence of abstinence-only education increasing the risk that the kids involved literally do not understand what is happening. Any one of those three kids should have a perfectly valid right to say yes if they've had a laughably basic sex education up to that point

[–]Watertor 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most of the kids at that age have had sex, and some have had sex multiple times. AoC doesn't reflect this at all. I get that 15 is a rough age, some are ready some are not. But a 17 year old is... more often than not friggin ready. Like, in my school anyway, if you were 18 and a virgin, you were considered a very late bloomer. But maybe that's just my perspective.

[–]voNlKONov 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're not wrong. People want to virtue signal all over the place but those guys she had sex with will be fine.

[–]HandyMoorcock 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice.

[–]Jenny927 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100%. The only ones complaining are the ones who couldn't get any in high school.

[–]sojerboy08 25 points26 points27 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey its me ur student

[–]Realrowanatkinson 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She looks like a creep too

[–]smoke-billowing 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Niiiiccccce

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Nice

[–]boltronical 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

http://i.imgur.com/DhYanwI.png

[–]Itsbilloreilly 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niiice

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Oh man, "victims" were 16 or 17 at the time! Which is legal age for sex in literally all of europe and happens all the time. It's even legal for student-teacher relationships.

Branding sex with 16 and 17 year olds and adults as some kind of sexual assault/deviancy/pedophilia is a very United States only thing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe

EDIT: No my username is an Undertale reference, not a pedo reference.

Thanks for the PM. Not.

[–]LawBot2016 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The parent mentioned Legal Age. Many people, including non-native speakers, may be unfamiliar with this word. Here is the definition(In beta, be kind):


Legal age or codified age refers to age at which a person may legally engage in a certain activity. Most frequently, this is the age of majority, the threshold of adulthood as recognized in law. [View More]


See also: Legal Working Age | Age Of Majority | Age Of Consent | Legally Competent | Marriageable Age

Note: The parent (little_goat_boy or ismyroofright) can delete this post | FAQ

[–]hl-99 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she looks fucking horrible

[–]WhenDidIBecomeAGhost 68 points69 points70 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Ha. I attend the same high school that this chick got fucked at. And just a few weeks ago I heard the story first hand from her first victim (not the only victim) . I could tell he was kinda boastful about it, and of course he's not gonna give the full details, but this teacher really did make the first move on several kids. Wish I was one of them. The bitch was hot. #FREEALTICE Edit: looking at some of the comments and I can answer questions on the matter if anyone is interested, I know quite a bit about the case.

[–]yakob67 50 points51 points52 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of my buddy. He was a TA for a teacher who ended up getting sent to jail for sleeping with her TA's. Turns out she slept with every TA except my friend haha

[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd just feel ashamed.

Like that fat kid who the pedophiles drive away from.

[–]Illumadaeus 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL fuck your friend. figuratively of course :)

[–]spyson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why did one of the students turn her in?

[–]WhenDidIBecomeAGhost 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What ended up happening was two TAs started having sexual relationships with her and then a couple friends found out. One of the friends felt really guilty (this is a dense Mormon populated city, so ya that played a part) and went to the administration, oh this is also WACK. One administrator did nothing about it for a couple weeks, then that student went to the police. Cuffed her, took her to jail, she got out on bail, then she had sex with a TOTALLY DIFFERENT student. So, judges are not too understanding of her actions.

[–]FatherSigma 153 points154 points155 points 9 years ago (103 children) | Copy Link

Even I, do not hope she serves 30 years for that. Yes - It was wrong and she should serve time - but hell no, that her crime was worth 30 years. Not for anyone. Man or woman.

[–]connerisonreddit666 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lots of people get less time than that for murdering people so yea I agree 30 years is a bit much

[–]Astrrum 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Stopping by from r/all.

My impression has always been that a majority of reddit thinks the age of consent should be 16. I guess this sub is different, or do they only care about consent laws when the man is the older one?

[–]NMEChachi 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not at all. Hell I'd go with 15, as it is in Sweden and a few more reasonable and more secular countries. The problem in America is abstinence education which increases the risk that the kids literally have no idea what is happening. As far as I'm concerned abstinence ed and even sparse variants of sex ed should be banned. There's no reason any mentally healthy teenager with a respectable sex education shouldn't be able to confidently make that choice for themselves by 15 -- with really good education, I'd wager most by 14, but wouldn't set the age that low

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The main issue here is she was in a position of trust, which muddies the waters massively.

[–]AthenaOverAres 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like the one-liners that suit the narative of the sub where upvoted like crazy. Typical. Whereas the people who actually read the article and responded seem more moderate, but longer replys and challenging the narative infrequently get upvoted to the top.

Although, potentially contradicting my point, she was their teacher which is "position of power" so I can see where that may imply it is less okay. Not my opinion, but I can understand that logic.

[–]Megneous 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who fucking knows when it comes to Americans, mate. They're conservative as hell and apparently think no one under 18 can make decisions for themselves.

In my country, the federal age of consent is like 14, and each prefecture has the ability to make a higher age of consent if they really want to. But it's a nonissue because those laws are entirely ignored in terms of statutory "rape." We don't consider consensual sex a crime, but rather a rash decision that should probably result in you losing your job, but jail time is ridiculous. We spend our resources on people who actually think they were victimized, coerced, etc, as that's what the word "rape" here means.

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points50 points 9 years ago (86 children) | Copy Link

She raped three underage children, thirty years seems good to me.

[–]magnue 99 points100 points101 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

In the UK this would be legal. Calling a 16 year old a child is ridiculous.

[–]ismyroofright[S] 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

It's legal in most of the US, though not for teacher/student relationships. Referring to 16 year-olds as "children" in other contexts is also ridiculous but is used as the basis for crimes that sentence men to long jail terms with lifetime consequences. Touch, but don't look, is the law for those 16-17.

[–]insufferably_smug 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Calling a 16 year old a child is ridiculous.

It sure is, but is it really legal in the UK for a teacher to have sex with underage students? I find that hard to believe. Isn't there some law against abuse of position of trust?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Teacher fucking a student shouldn't be allowed. Especially underage.

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The teacher would never be allowed to teach again.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She would lose her job, not go to prison for 30 years, in fact this happened with a teacher when I was at school (female teacher male boy).

[–]eouaoe 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, although legally, they don't call them a child either. the correct term is "Minor" not "Children".

[–]Kayakingtheredriver 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would a 16 year old be treated as an adult in all other crimes, though? I ask this, because I remember having an argument about someone murdering someone else with a brit and me saying, at 16 you have the werewithal to know taking someone out into the woods, having them dig the grave with you as a fun project and then murdering them, at least in my mind, made you fully culpable. He said they were a child legally and morally. So, legally would that be a child in the UK?

[–][deleted] 190 points191 points192 points 9 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link

They were 16 and 17 hardly children. I went into the military at 17.

[–]DangerChipmunk 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I went into the military at 17.

Doesn't that require your parents permission?

[–]terminalthree 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes it does... pretty much she raped them. Also just because you can join the military at 17 with parents permission, as I also did, that is under the knowledge that the military will look out for their well being you reasonably considering the job hazards. She engaged in very inappropriate behavior with boys who are not legal adults. Reverse the genders and nobody would bat an eye over 30 years and they would probably be cheering saying they hope the guy gets raped in jail. Case fuckin' closed here.

[–]mismanaged 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Reverse the genders and it wouldn't be statutory rape. Age of consent for girls is 16 in Utah

[–]terminalthree 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That seems kind of fucked up..16? Mormons...

[–]mismanaged 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Age of consent is 16 in a lot of places. As for fucked up, that's entirely a cultural norm.

[–]ismyroofright[S] 132 points133 points134 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

They let you enlist at 17 because you are a child who doesn't know better.

[–]DonGingie 34 points35 points36 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

People can graduate high school at 17. Nothing wrong with wanting to join the military after you finish high school.

[–]digitalsparks points 9 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah its perfectly fine to serve your Country at 17, just dont service any pussy til your 18. <~ Makes perfect sense now, thanks.

[–]LouSputhole94 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This. If you can fight and die for your country you can get your dick wet. Was what she did wrong? Yes. Does she deserve 30 years? Fuck no.

[–]spyson 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also can't buy alcohol because you don't have the best self control, but here's your gun.

[–]AlexaWikipediaSmegma 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I graduated at 17 and had an apartment and a job. The older I get the less I believe that with age comes wisdom. We're all basically just big, stupid kids walking around.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

this.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On the same note, I graduated high school at 16 and went straight to college. If I can make the call to be thousands of dollars in debt to the federal government at that age, I sure as hell could have said yes/no to a teacher wanting sex.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The military was good for me it helped me grow up.

[–]terminalthree 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It also requires both or primary legal guardians permission though.

[–]PuffinGreen 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok and if you can throw your life away like that, you can fuck your teacher.

[–]demontrace 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Old enough to kill someone, but not old enough to have consensual sex with someone 18 or older. Now THAT'S priorities...

[–]PregnantMale 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Think about this. What if the sex's were reversed. People would be calling for life in prison, not just 30 years.

[–]Pipboy0003 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

That was your choice, theirs was taken.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

That's not the point I was a man at 17.

[–]kireol 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Your brain, and their's were not fully developed at 17.

[–]braised_diaper_shit 54 points55 points56 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

But they're fully developed at 18?

[–]auron_py 32 points33 points34 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, they fully develop at 00:00 hours of your 18th birthday. /s

[–]kireol 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

that would be 25 years old

[–]GingerSnapBiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So why is the age of consent 18 then? If we aren't fully developed till 25

[–]kireol 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't create the human body nor did I create the laws that govern us. I have no idea.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is the problem with young people today especially men. they are too overly protected. They are not allowed to mature normally. They are immature til they are 30.

[–]Cryhavok101 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Am 31, am still immature :P

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No you weren't, you thought you were but you weren't.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you weren't.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe not in this day and age but believe me in the past you were a man at 17.

[–]Pipboy0003 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually you were a man at twelve, in the old days.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No you weren't. Nobody is.

Unless you raise your siblings alone, work your ass every day and shit like that, you are not a man at the age of 17.

[–]Ba_dongo 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Children? Most people are having sex by that time, and it's usually legal in most of the western world. You people are so fucking angry. Is everything ok? She should lose her job, but if the students were willing, a jail sentence seems incredibly harsh I think.

[–]harris101 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If any of those 'children' murdered someone, they would be tried as adults undoubtedly.. If you are old enough to be tried as an adult, you're old enough to decide whether you want to fuck someone..

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

Statutory raped*

Edit: nevermind she's an actual rapist

[–]gingermagician2 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

still raped*

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Just not treated the same way as standard rape

[–]kireol 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

From the article: "three counts of forcible sex abuse"

You have a very liberal definition of Statutory Rape

[–]Kayakingtheredriver 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was guilty of statutory rape. She plead to 3 counts of forcible rape, because even though it is much worse, the total time she was facing for the 11 instances of statutory rape added up to more time than 3 forcible rape charges.

Basically they got her to plead to worse for less time by going crazy on the charges that actually applied to her. This type of government shenanigans should piss everyone off. It is dirty as what she actually did.

[–]Iamthesmartest 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would've been trying to bang her at 16.

[–]-Lo_Mein_Kampf- 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I was 16 this would not have been rape in my mind. This would have been GOLD

[–]Megneous 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol, Americans are weird. Statutory rape in my country, if consensual, is considered a rash decision and you'll likely lose your job, but it's not rape. We don't call it rape, because it's not rape. Rape is when you're coerced or forced to have sex. Can a teacher coerce a student to have sex? Absolutely. But unless evidence is presented that shows that, you cannot claim that's what happened.

[–]Patiiii 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Theres a difference between 10 year olds and 17. Its pretty fucked up how if the kid was one year older this wouldve been fine but for some reason we set a limit at 18.

[–]AdvocateForTulkas 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly I view statutory rape due to age when someone is a year under the limit as different than straight rape. I realize most people here disagree. Man or woman that's how I feel about it though.

[–]ismyroofright[S] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I detect pussy sympathy. If the laws need to be changed, let's change them. But a man would be facing exactly the same.

[–]Genezip 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Man or woman"

[–]ismyroofright[S] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"If the laws need to be changed, let's change them."

[–]greengrasser11 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The issue with cases like this is the problem of trust. You send your kids to school hoping that the school will keep them safe, but instead a person of authority in the school is having sex with your child.

I'm still not saying the 30 years thing is justified, but at least we can see why this isn't just about an age gap rather also one about child safety and trust in our public institutions.

[–]Minusguy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the case is pretty stupid. It wasn't actually rape no matter what you say and, well, a year would be more than enough. I would prefer her to get fined even.

[–]stomaticmonk 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would be willing to bet that the kids that she banged are still high giving each other.

[–]dabilee01 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What she looks like at the club. What she looks like in the morning.

Be careful out there, gents.

[–]spicybuttholenachos points 9 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I know I'm part of the problem and I hate myself but...... Teacher is fucking smoking !

[–]boondockspank 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

ITT: a bunch of people who think these dudes are scarred for life over this. If that is the case (it's not), then they are seriously weird dudes. She's fairly attractive and having sex with an attractive woman as a teenage male is not a "traumatic" experience. Fucking Christ. This woman does not deserve 30 years in prison for this.

[–]ismyroofright[S] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If men deserve it then so do women.

[–]boondockspank 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would not agree that a man deserves 30 years for having sex with a 17 year old girl. 17 year old humans are fully developed sexually. It's not right, but it's not 30 years in prison wrong.

[–]dark_knight097 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe you should be advocating that men shouldn't get sentencing like this either if its consensual instead of just saying "Well damn, we get shafted by the law so let's make it so everyone is shafted!"

[–]ismyroofright[S] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No one cares about men getting shafted so nothing will change until there are lots of women telling their sob stories all over the media.

[–]NoMoreEgress 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ikr she just needs to loose her job.

[–]realstekcor 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i'd still bang

[–]Ferguson97 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should serve some jail time, but 30 years is batshit crazy. Like... 3-5 years max.

[–]Thehulk666 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

30 years is ridiculous, this isn't pedo shit.

[–]Hope499 points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

"During the parole hearing, Altice admitted to inappropriate sexual conduct with the victims, who were 16 and 17 at the time."

Come on...

I am sorry, downvote me all you like, but a 17 year old dude...I hardly think he feels victimized.

Shit, i was 15 when i slept with a 35 year old, still a great day for me lol.

I dunno...guess I am weird.

[–]Pavlovs_Human 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the biggest issue is that while you had a good experience and weren't traumatized, we have to remember that every situation is different. If sexual misconduct is allowed to continue then a precedent is set and no one will care when a kid does get forced into sex with a female teacher.

[–]as_above_so_below 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she was giving me gobbies at 16 I'd have been a happy young man and would've kept my mouth shut. I know everyone is different but damn in that first photo she can get the dick.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Man, where were these teachers when i was in high school?

[–]dark_knight097 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right? Every time I read a story like this, that's all I can think of. (I'm 18btw, just graduated last year)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In jail

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting subhuman.

[–]aarghj 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Man, she went from mega hot to mega not in only 2 short years...

[–]Brandwein 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyone who has sex with minors has issues. You can't cite this issues as a DEFENSE, because they are the CAUSE. And they are YOU, not something that you have no fault for.

[–]Rhythmusk0rb 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My opinion on 'how wrong' this is doesnt matter. A man wouldve gotten life as the minimum

[–]freenarative 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is fucked up. I read "underage" and I thought they were, like, 10.

In the UK they would be of legal age. She'd still be in trouble with the law though for "abuse of a position of trust"

[–]Stephen1985 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well the legal age in some countries is much lower so shall we all start fucking 14 year olds? The law is the law.

[–]nuesuh 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

b-but she's a woman? And she's crying!

[–]rapscallionx 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd be willing to bet most pedophiles have extreme self esteem issues.

[–]van-nostrand-md 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever noticed how people always say "I take full responsibility for what I did" but then ask for leniency? Taking responsibility is bearing the consequences for your behavior. You can't just say you take responsibility....you have to actually take responsibility.

I hope she's denied parole and bears the full sentence. People are always so swayed by tears. Somehow I don't think she shed any tears after she got home from one of her encounters.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know it's wrong but I wish I had her as a teacher and it happened to me.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

She's attractive. Doesn't strike me as too severe hope she catches a break.

[–]RottonPotatoes 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/punchablelipbite

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad to see the law come down on a rapist, regardless of gender. What a shit excuse.

[–]Kungligapostverket 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that's too bad, say good bye to your life.

[–]SethVermin 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking good she was denied. Fuckin bitch.

[–]AndyFNG 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Up to 30 years? Holy shit. The kids were 16 and 17. Even the minimum of 2 years seems like a lot to me. This doesn't feel like justice.

[–]Angry_Concrete 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where the hell were these teachers when I was in high school?

[–]Stephen1985 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They were busy fucking the hot guys. Not wasting their time with you.

[–]2gudfou 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

16 is the most common age of consent in the US, she is a criminal for having sex in the wrong state. Although it being a student is not okay

[–]nib_igc 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

As a Utah tax payer, I'm super happy we will have to continue to pay to house this super dangerous criminal, since according to my state, an otherwise capable 17 year old can't legally decide to fuck... great stuff. Well, so long as ya'll can enjoy your little meninist circle jerk, I guess it's all worth it.... Every penny... super worth it.

[–]BannedFromImzy 35 points36 points37 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I hope they keep her in until 2045. So that her kids and her grandkids will only remember her behind bars. And that afterwards she has to register for life as a high category sex offender so that even interaction with her grandkids and great-grandkids have to be supervised.

[–]crimson117 43 points44 points45 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What makes you hope that so strongly? (I don't know much about the case beyond this article...)

[–]Uncle_Erik 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The article says she raped a victim while she was out on bail. She had been arrested and was charged with a number of felonies. She was released on bail.

Then she committed the same crime again.

Fuck her. Anyone who commits the same crime again while on bail deserves a very long sentence. I don't know if 30 years is too much, but she needs a good 10-15 in the can.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"raped a victim" "had consensual sex with someone slightly out of the arbitrary state-specific consent age"

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Funny how people defend rapists when it's about a hot female.

[–]TaylorHammond9 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you read the article or just the headline?

[–]feluto 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Those "Kids" were of legal age almost anywhere else on the planet, it was still fucked up but 30 years is a bit fucking excessive

[–]Bman1973 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This shit drives me crazy, if this were a male teacher, the judge wouldn't be asking him if he thought he understood the gravity of what he was doing, he would have gotten longer. It sounds like they want to be lenient with her!!!! This is Nuts...We need to organize on a big level and first and foremost, work to end the insane preferential treatment that women get in custody cases...and also this female rape of young boys thing that is happening more and more in schools...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Altice, 36, pleaded guilty to three counts of forcible sex abuse in April 2015

I think the word you're looking for here is "rape"

[–]The_Sad_Deku 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Raped, not "had sex with"

She is a rapist.

[–]feluto 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Statutory rapist

[–]Fat_n_Ugly_Luvr 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn she's hot

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not so bad. They were 16 and 17 at the time. 16 is the legal age of consent here in Canada, and it was 14 (with parental permission, I believe) up until a few years ago--this was based on physical maturity [please read up on it if you're interested, I am too tired to put any more effort into this comment than these brackets right now] so kind of sad to see her even go to jail in my books.

The courts really need to get a handle on this stuff so it's more about biological/psychological maturity of both parties, position of power, willingness, etc., than pandering to the angry townspeople. Edit: words for clarity.

[–]hereforthensfwstuff 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Isn't there links on how it affects personalities?

[–]theoleslippydrip points 9 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Dont read the comments on that site...

[–]zakir2 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Or this one for that matter...

[–]lookxdontxtouch 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His did I miss this story? That was my fucking high school after all!

...although quite a few years after I had graduated. Also, side note, my English teacher in tenth grade was married to bmx'er Fuzzy Hall and she was gorgeous! I wrote a poem about her for an assignment once, but I certainly never got laid for it...I thought it was worthy.

[–]PunctuationsOptional 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

W/makeup: 7

W/o makeup: 4

[–]ColorsMayInTimeFade 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

W/rice ?

[–]Blimey85 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

5/7

[–]rekabis 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But… but… but… but… she’s a woman… how can they possibly set the standards of her sentence to the same degree a man? Doesn’t she deserve leniency due to her sex? Isn’t that what third-wave feminism is all about? /s

[–]MrMeier 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I pled guilty and traded rape for forceful sex...

WTF America! Who came up with that?

[–]CountyMcCounterson points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

They were 17, that would be legal in most countries

[–]sylect 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niccccccccccccccccce

[–]MrMoustachio 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still not an excuse, but I believe her. She looks like a goblin. That no doubt causes self esteem issues.

[–]MannekenP 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was sentenced to at least two years and up to 30 years in prison

Is that the same as "30 years but you can be released after 2 years if certain conditions are met" ?

[–]LEGITIMATE_SOURCE 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Leave now if you're looking for a rational discussion. Then again, this sub is about holding women to the standards of dealing with men. Never touches on the deeper issues of flaws in perception of justice.

[–]rackflowseidon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I went to high school at davis and I know two of the kids she had sex with. Kaysville has a lot of Mormons and this was definitely shocking to everyone.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At some point schools have to stop hiring young women to teach high school boys, there is a new one of these stories every week.

[–]chillmonkey88 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Make-up is a hell of a thing. I might start using it just to see if life is easier.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I go to Davis and she was my teacher. Fucking crazy. Hot as he tho

[–]the_unseen_one 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's crazy seeing all the comments on that article defending this woman and saying she should have got parole. Meanwhile if a man did it, he would have been locked up for 50+ years. Equality!

[–]Arch-username 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should have got parole and so should a male teacher if the circumstances were the same. In my view, Anglo-Saxon societies criminalise and pathologise sex in a way that is itself sort of pathological. They (we) still see sexual relations in terms of centuries of repressive religious ideals that utterly fail to take in to account the realities of human nature and the varieties of human sexuality. If a sexual relationship or act brings you happiness and pleasure, there should be no legal reason to deny other than to ensure you don't force it on someone who doesn't find it pleasurable or for whom it would cause unhappiness. Life can be hard, and lonely and isolating enough without what restricting what those above the age of consent are able to consent to.

[–]za4h 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She did terrible things and deserves to be in prison, but if my teacher looked like the picture on the left, I'd let her do whatever she wanted to me.

[–]PacoRamirez1966 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These double standards crack me up. Feminism is a disease.

[–]NthngSrs 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lock her up. Perv.

[–]nmagod 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her current scheduled release date is 2045

YES

[–]sign_on_the_window 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Part of me is angry that a teacher took advantage of students and messed them up down the road.

But I gotta be honest.

Part of me is jealous as fuck that none of these teachers taught my high school. I only had one hot English teacher who is literally the reincarnation of Satan himself.

[–]Erudite_Delirium 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

To all the apologists of this pedophile, please read the full article. It talks about the victim impact statements for all 3 victims, and how her actions had really fucked them up, created problems for them and compounded pre-existing problems (that she arguably knowingly exploited). That would've been taken into account in the sentencing and is also being taken into account at the parole hearings. I really doubt she'll get anything close to the full 30, maybe more in the 6-10 range, imo the parole board would be waiting for her to express remorse not just for how much she regrets having affected her own life but screwing them up and being so predatory and abusing her position in the community (her having sex in a church parking lot probably wouldn't endear her to them much either). That massive sentence scope also gives opportunity to see how well the victims recover and that will probably also play a big role in the length of the time served.

[–]Arch-username 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Paedophilia means sexual interest in prepubescent children. None of the people in this case were pre-pubescent thus it's not paedophilia. You could make the argument that the teacher is an ephebophile but in order for this to be accurate you would have to know that she was generally only able to be sexually aroused with adolescents who possessed secondary (adult) sexual characteristics (pubic hair, breasts, wide hips, adult-sized genitals etc).

Just in case you were interested in the science of it as opposed to virtue-signalling sanctimony and self-righteousness - which is what this sub seems to be morphing into a platform for.

[–]rebbell19 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I might unsubscribe from this shit it's getting ridiculous.

[–]prometheus_winced 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you (as the student) look back on it and masturbate to it as your greatest sexual memory, I don't think it's a crime.

[–]ThugDaddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as someone over 18, id smash

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those poor 16 and 17 year old victims who had sexual relations with their hot teacher in the parkign lot during lunch break. Justice must be served. She needs to stay in prison for at least 30 years

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish my math teacher in 9th grade had sex with me :(

[–]casemodsaltI masturbate to big men pissing on me..... alot 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hope that rapist rots in jail

[–]COMPTONOAK 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NIIIIIICCCCEEEE

[–]ELITEJoeFlacco 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What's with her lip on the left photo ?

[–]ismyroofright[S] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's trying to look sexy for the camera?

[–]judgedeath2 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus Christ, Kaysville

What gives? Utah just a hotspot for this?

[–]Tmanbro 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niceeee

[–]ender89 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, if I looked like that, I'd have self esteem issues too.

[–]Ekrank 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niceeeeeeeeee

[–]__word_clouds__ 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Word cloud out of all the comments.

I hope you like it

[–]bob1689321 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally nothing to do with pussy pass.

[–]FundleBundle 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

God damn, 16 and 17 year old dudes? Why is she in jail?

[–]Stephen1985 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because she broke the law

[–]FundleBundle 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but why is that the law is my question.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had friends in her classes when this all came out.

I shit you not, she teaches English and they were reading the Scarlett Letter.

[–]odkfn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's weird, but I do think it's different - I'm not even sure why.

Is it sexist that I think in this scenario the boys would have been equally up for it and there will be no lasting emotional effects, but if it was reversed the girls would be victims and the teacher would be a predator?

[–]Zantitrach 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it sexist that I think in this scenario the boys would have been equally up for it and there will be no lasting emotional effects, but if it was reversed the girls would be victims and the teacher would be a predator?

Without a doubt

[–]odkfn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's just my own experience or personality, but when I was 17 if I had sex with a fit female teacher I'd be loving life!

[–]RaymondRasmusson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niceeee

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Faaaaarrrrrkkkk just had the best spackle to her photos. Fucken insta-jizz

[–]pabbseven 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyones dream!

[–]ingrown_hair 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can muster some sympathy and I'll let the parole board sort out her sentence. But I always wonder why these teachers don't just find someone age appropriate to have sex with. In cases where there is only one victim, you can understand the attachment, but when there's more tan one student (or more than one teacher) it's both immoral and stupid.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm going to be perfectly honest; 16 and 17 year olds are not children.

She should be fired, but I don't think this deserves jail time like this.

For the record, I would say the same if the genders were flipped.

[–]Kangaroobopper 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Altice admitted to inappropriate sexual conduct with the victims, who were 16 and 17 at the time

...nice

[–]fancyleggs 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would have banged my hot young teachers if I had any, as a guy with a large penis and high sex drive i don't see the problem

[–]mhmmrockets 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish I could go back and bang some of my highschool teachers

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She is way too hot to have self-esteem issues.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter