TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Just less than a month apart.

DredFX

December 12, 2016
5738 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/by9xssryq43y.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Just less than a month apart.
Author

DredFX

Upvotes 5738
Comments 311
Date December 12, 2016 12:31 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5hwcvj/just_less_than_a_month_apart/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/just-less-than-a-month-apart.935971
https://theredarchive.com/post/935971
Top posts by DredFX

It's only creepy when men do it.

3629 upvotes
July 17, 2017
/r/MensRights

Jezebel writers are impartial and do not project their misandry into their articles.

100 upvotes
January 13, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 346 points347 points348 points 9 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link

Feminists: toxic masculinity is something men force on other men that makes them hide their emotions and ultimately causes them real.... Oh you want to talk about men's issues? Lol male tears!

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mochacola 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

No.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mochacola 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

No, MRM shouldn't believe feminists is trying to help men too.

No, the idea of 'toxic masculinity' was not invented to help men.

Truth: feminist movement hijacked dv narrative to hoard relief funds to their movement, by rejecting the idea that men can be victims.

But instead of admitting their Duluth Model was false, they spin it as toxic masculinity made it difficult for male victims to open up and seek help.

Truth: feminist movement continue to use male violence as a potential threat to children to rig family court system.

But instead of looking the consequences of fatherless kids and admitting they created a system that makes it easy for moms to lie to extort money from dad's, they spun it to dad's not having custody due to toxic masculinity which made men unable to express their love to their kids, creating a weaker parent/child bond.

I can go on and on. But 'toxic masculinity' is just a way to blame everything back to men. Saying, if men stop acting like men, all their problems will go away. Nevermind all legislative changes made against men.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mochacola 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

My God. I do not want women oppressed. Where did I say I want women oppressed?

Telling the truth about domestic violence is oppressing women? 50/50 custody where kids get to have both parents is oppressing women?

I understand a lot of people like you have very good intentions but just too naively innocent. I'm talking about exposing truth. How is exposing truth oppressing anyone?

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You just fell for the black and white fallacy.

Oh, you're against this? You must want women to suffer!

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mochacola 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You are still very ill-informed. I didn't made shit up to demonize any group. I stated facts. Why don't you keep an open mind, listen to what Erin Pizzey has to say, start from there, follow the white ribbit and see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Adanu0 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He has a very informed view of the world, and coming from a place of certainty, can state his claims with confidence. Any serious look at the cultural narrative of the Western world will tell you all of this.

Either you refuse to do your own research, or you are a feminazi concern troll.

[+]theoldentimes -72 points-71 points-70 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

You're full of shit m8.

The key detail here is the source - both these extracts come from the UK's daily mail - a traditionally fascist paper that is virulently anti-feminist. If they think there's a few hits to get out of 'talking about your feelings' they'll go down that route, but the insincerity of doing so is revealed as soon as an opportunity to do the opposite is presented.

Only just seen what sub this is, fucking cancer

[–]Warriv9 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

oh i just saw this was about men's rights, fucking cancer, men don't deserve rights. You are a shame for society. i am sorry for you and the people in your vicinity.

[+]Eoinbreal -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Too much cum shots

[–]Warriv9 -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

i don't think she deserves ridicule like that. i think some women are just very irresponsible with power. it IS true that "the patriarchy" has hurt women for a LONG time. But now that that time is ending, some women who have the right to wield power over men do it quite irresponsibility. the same is true for any oppressed group. as soon as they are able to free themselves from oppression, a certain amount of them seek revenge on anyone who was or even would have been part of the oppressing group.

many of the Jewish nazi hunters were quite ruthless. am i defending nazis? no. many blm activists are quite ruthless. am i defending slavery? no. but im against oppression no matter what. i don't condone revenge. i see abuse/oppression as a sickness both to the oppressed and the oppressors. many women see men and mens rights activists as "cancer" because they think there's some level of vengeance due. i disagree with that. and i disagree with this woman, but i also disagree with you.

[–]Eoinbreal -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

i dont care

[–]Warriv9 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

i know you don't. you care about causing pain to men. you want to hurt HALF THE WORLD. you are insane, and that's why im sorry for you and the people that have to deal with you. its ok though, you are too weak to hurt too many people and most of your anger will manifest itself in you. you are your worst victim. im sorry for you.

[–]Eoinbreal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

wow you sound like a whole bag of fun

[–]Warriv9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

you sound like Hitler.

[–]Eoinbreal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

More fun than you, hitlers accent is funny

[–]THEJAZZMUSIC 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're wrong about this sub, but you're right about the Daily Mail. They would absolutely run any piece of shit article, contradict themselves ten times in ten seconds, just to get eyeballs on their fucking rag.

Honestly, posts like this are just outrage porn. But you'll find it in every sub. People like to feel that righteous indignation of gloating over an overt injustice or hypocrisy. It's just a cheap way of scoring karma and getting people riled up.

This is not an important men's rights issue, it's just a rag being a rag. But then YouTube comments by console gamers aren't important to PC gaming, Trump's opinion on SNL isn't important to world politics, etc.. But clamp down a sub enough to do away with the white noise, and you'll just drive users away.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, posts like this are just outrage porn. But you'll find it in every sub.

Pretty much. Goes with the territory of sites that function like reddit do. Low quality, little effort [for the viewer] posts are going to happen and no amount of whining is going to stop them anywhere.

And you can still spark up a legitimate discussion on these types of posts if you feel like it.

[–]flaccid_randy 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bet you're fun at parties

[–]LeighGriffaldo 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice one bro 👍

[–]Warriv9 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i don't think you're a bad person. i think you're angry about the way life has played out and i think that is warranted. i don't think that adding to the destructive aspects of life is healthy for you or anyone else. i hope that you are kinder to people of all types and even non people. life is good even if it can be destructive at times.

[–]iHeartCandicePatton 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you retarded

[–]Papa_Milo -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are cancer.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're a foot long cancer sub with extra mayo.

[–]RationalistFaith1 -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[+][deleted] -12 points-11 points-10 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Please kill yourself.

[–]-27-153 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Do you think before typing? Look at the topic you're posting under.....

[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm on your side, dummy. And it's "you're."

[–]NOT_A_SENTIENT_DILDO 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're telling someone to kill themselves. You ain't on my side, bitch!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You guys are so easily triggered.

[–]Voidrith 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Once you tell someone to kill themselves, you're certainly not on our side.

[–]uDurDMS8M0rZ6Im59I2R -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Humans: Red is my favorite color

Humans: Blue is my favorite color

???

[–]runean 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is a bad analogy

[+]uDurDMS8M0rZ6Im59I2R -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Anyone can call themselves feminist, it's not hard to point out contradictions in such a vast and ill-defined group.

[–]runean 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but the statement is also true. I could use your argument to pick apart a group of two people...

Third wave feminism has become largely toxic and accusatory.

[–]ExpendableOne 416 points417 points418 points 9 years ago (249 children) | Copy Link

"From Tammy Hughes", and here I though it was the patriarchy telling men not to cry. I am shocked! I wonder if there has ever been a time where one woman saw a man cry and thought to herself "I respect him that much more now as a person and as a man, and him crying makes him that much more desirable to me".

[–]sunascorpion 77 points78 points79 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Not "desirable" in the sense that I then want to sleep with him, but I'll give you examples from my personal experience for the sake of the conversation.

I had been married to my husband for a few months and made some stupid comment about his weight (I can't remember what it was). I wasn't intending to be mean, but it came off that way and reminded him of how he'd get made fun of and excluded from groups growing up because he's fat. He started crying, and I was shocked. I had never seen him cry before.

My first reaction was, "Holy shit, I'm an asshole, I just made this strong and usually happy man cry because I said something fucking stupid." Then, as stupid as it sounds, I realized that he wasn't always strong and happy. He wasn't this all-powerful rock that could handle anything and everything life threw at him. He's a fucking human being, and he has emotions like everyone else, I'd just never seen the unhappy ones before.

Three years later, we're still married, we're still very much in love, and he knows that he can talk to me about anything because I will listen. Our relationship is based on communication and honesty. When he's refusing to talk to me about what's bothering him, I get unhappy because I can't be there for him. When he opens up, when he's honest and even when he's vulnerable and cries (which doesn't happen often but it does happen), I don't think any less of him. I'm happy he feels safe enough with me to be that honest, and I'm happy when I can help him feel better about what's bothering him.

This may just be my opinion, but if you're with a woman who's making you feel bad because you have emotions, you are a thousand times better off without that woman in your life. I know it sucks--i have been insulted, made fun of and smacked around for showing my emotions to the wrong people, and it fucking sucks. But that doesn't mean you should never open up to anyone ever again.

You just need someone you can trust, be it your parent, sibling, spouse, best friend, therapist, even writing down how you feel and then shredding it can be helpful. But there are people who care about you, there are plenty of people who care about men and want them to succeed and be happy. Don't let the few assholes make you guys think otherwise.

[–]Strange_Bedfellow 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're a great woman, and your husband is lucky.

But what do you do when all you know as a man is to hold your emotions in? Especially when you are introverted, and don't have a large number of friends? Even less that you see on a regular basis?

It's been over 5 years since I've had a girlfriend, or for that matter, just a friend I could open up to. I can't afford to talk to a therapist, so what do I do from here?

As a coping mechanism, I have accepted that I will be alone until the day I die. Though, as much as I like my solitude, now and again I need social interaction. But I always get cancelled on when I reach out. I also don't get much in the way of invites any other time.

So, what do I do? My schedule is restrictive, I have no confidence, and few friends. How do I change any of this?

[–]mrmensplights 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I completely agree with you but there's also a huge contextual difference between men in public and men in private. In public, men are expected to be more stoic, to take more risks, and to tackle problems without hesitation. These behaviours and the expectation of them are just part of the dice roll evolution instilled in men. Because these are biologically 'male' behaviours they are seen as attractive by most women when it comes to casually dating as well.

Private is totally different. Your husband isn't just any man to you. He's your husband. It's precisely because you know him so much better that he can open up without it being off putting. You only know the surface details of strangers and if they break from the script and act in an aberrant way it means uncertainty, and uncertainty could be a threat. However, when your husband breaks from the norm you don't see that as dangerous to you.. you just see his pain.

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

if you're with a woman who's making you feel bad because you have emotions, you are a thousand times better off without that woman in your life.

This is a systematic problem, not just a few isolated women who act as a hated minority. These are expectations that are culturally adopted by women, which other women collectively emulate, encourage and legitimize. There are certainly women who grow to empathize with their significant other, especially as they mature over the years, but those women will still generally have a much different outlook towards men outside of that pre-established relationship and how women view/judge men will still be a cultural reality. You cannot just "get rid of these women", because these are just about every women you have in your life, and will likely meet or interact with in the future. The fact that you even described this story as some kind of revelation to you, kind of shows that you had pre-existing ideals before getting into the relationship.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 61 points62 points63 points 9 years ago (208 children) | Copy Link

Woman here. Have definitely thought that about men before.

[–]majortom22 171 points172 points173 points 9 years ago (168 children) | Copy Link

@ Nearl

I am not accusing you of lying. I believe you, I do. But that's such an anomaly that I don't believe it in a sense.

We're not dumb. We act like that and vaginas turn into the mohave desert. And if our respect was on the stock market it plummets.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (130 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]captshady 198 points199 points200 points 9 years ago* (82 children) | Copy Link

The wife nagged at me for never crying, or showing sadness. My dad got cancer, and I cried when he told me, for like an hour. I heard her on the phone the next day with her friend, complaining about how she had to spend "soooo much time, dealing with his crying, and being sad."

Edit: My father is alive and well. He had prostate cancer. He had it removed, went through treatment and is fine.

[–]TheObelisk 43 points44 points45 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I would NEVER say anything like that about someone who i loved, and the fact that YOU could shows me that our loves are not on the same level. It's an insult to me that you'd ever speak that way about me in my weakest moment to your friend. I can't be married to a person as heartless and unempathetic as you." Would have been my response.

[–]mwobuddy 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I heard her on the phone the next day with her friend, complaining about how she had to spend "soooo much time, dealing with his crying, and being sad."

Narcissistic cunt. Get away now.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]captshady 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ex-spouse

[–]candyman420 61 points62 points63 points 9 years ago (72 children) | Copy Link

You can never confide in a woman who isn't your mother. Ever.

[–]zxain 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shit, I can't even confide in my mother.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im 34. It fits me life experience perfectly.

You're the one who sounds like a kid who refuses to accept the world as it is.

[–]candyman420 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

high school kids huh. Try giving it some critical thought, try to imagine what you are in your partner's eyes. an unwavering rock or someone that can be easily overcome by emotion just like them? you will go down a notch if you do it, guaranteed.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]LucifersHammerr 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I noticed above you wrote "yeah only from men" about the tendency of enforcing gender roles. This is backwards:

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor.

"Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up and talk about their feelings, and they are criticized for being emotionally walled-off; but if they get too real, they are met with revulsion. She recalled the first time she realized that she had been complicit in the shaming: "Holy Shit!" she said. "I am the patriarchy!"

http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/

Female disgust at male weakness is rooted in biology.

The reason women cannot readily admit to contradictions that end up hurting others, such as telling men to be more vulnerable and then recoiling in disgust when they do, is they cannot face the public shame of being thought of as a bad person, one who hurts others. And without the ability to face their shame, they do not learn how to override these instinctual drives.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-women-repulsed-by-male-vulnerability-as-discovered-by-Bren%C3%A9-Brown

Whatever you may think of your own relationship and how well it's going, you are NOT giving men good advice on this thread.

Edit: I'm being downvoted by feminists for quoting a feminist who took a scientific approach to the issue lol.

[–]candyman420 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your relationship "cemented" after you broke down because now she has taken on a motherly role, on some level.

Trust me, crying is not attractive to her, but she still cares for you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

You can have emotions and be a rock at he same time. You can be sad and be there for the people around you.

[–]candyman420 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

A vulnerable person who breaks down is not perceived the same way as someone who does not.

[–][deleted] 55 points56 points57 points 9 years ago* (43 children) | Copy Link

That's a little to much red pill for me.

Men in healthy relationships can and should be able to cry too their significant other.

EDIT:their are plenty of men out there who don't want to cry, and plenty of women who think men crying is the ultimate turn off, both are fine and healthy, communication is key.

[–]sketchbookuser 44 points45 points46 points 9 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

Sure blame it on the red pill. I'm sure you've never heard the phrase "real men don't cry" before in your life.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hitleresque 32 points33 points34 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Well who else would you hear it from? You won't hear it from a woman, because assuming it's true and they do lose respect for you they're not going to be forthright with that information. They'll just talk to their friends about it behind your back.

[–]mrmensplights 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait.. isn't this very post about a female journalist making fun of men for crying?

[–]throwawaycomment31 25 points26 points27 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

fuck you

fuck me?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe you. In my experience, this sort of shit comes overwhelmingly from women.

No man has said anything remotely like that to me since I was a child.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman won't say it she will just avoid you afterwards

[–]candyman420 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not without the significant other (woman) losing some respect for you. Even if it's never communicated as such.

[–]Banned_By_Default 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a little bit too black and white for reality. Cancer is a more than valid reason to cry and should be respected no matter the human.

Also, men crying is still hard for most to handle. Some do it very well and some of those people are women.

You can have prejudices. It's a survival instinct, but remember to look at the individuals.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If its not communicated, and there is no evidence of this 'loss of respect', then it didn't happen.

[–]candyman420 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Because you know how to read minds?

[–]Hitleresque 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Men in healthy relationships can and should be able to cry too their significant other.

I disagree. Evolutionary speaking men are the backbone of the species, and women are evolved to seek out the strongest, most masculine ones. A woman will lose respect for a man who cries the same way a man will lose respect for a woman who's loud, obnoxious, and aggressive. You know, less feminine. Crying is not masculine because it does nothing to solve the problem at hand. This isn't a rule so much as a generalization, but I can guarantee there's a correlation between relationship failure and men crying.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hitleresque 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh man, evo psych is hilarious. masculinity and femininity aren't evolutionary concepts.

They certainly are when you can make qualitative observations about traits that tend to exist more on average in males or females.

Sexual selection is not a consistent force, selective pressures have changed over time and will continue to do so.

Of course, although much of our current psychological traits were influenced by hundreds of thousands of years. Human society did not exist as we know it for the vast majority of human existence, we are not adapted to our current environment yet.

Our current cultural beliefs are not here by design, they are the accumulation of a numerous different selective pressures that often don't even provide any benefits towards survival.

They provide benefits towards reproduction though, which is as important if not more so than survival.

Sexual conflict and sexual antagonism are important concepts you should read into. Evolution is far, far more complex than your simple explanation of sexual selection and survival of the fittest.

I know of them, and of course it is. That doesn't change the fact that a lot of human behaviours are well explained by evolutionary concepts. At the end of the day I can't make you see something you don't want to, but in case you feel like looking into it, there's a big body of work in this field by David Buss that's worth a read.

[–]Bascome 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Why? Have you examined that thought at all? Why is it true and is it always true?

If not why not?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Why?

If crying is an important emotional release for you, and your significant other is an important source of emotional support, then not communicating this need, and respecting it, is a sign of immaturity or a weak relationship.

Why is it true and is it always true?

There will also be exceptions, but if crying is an important emotional release for you, and your significant other is your emotional support, obviously your significant other needs to be OK with that for your relationship to be healthy.

[–]Bascome -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes obviously that is a need IF ... but that is a hell of a big IF you are skipping over.

In fact there are two big IFs in your point.

I can tell you in my life neither one applies. It would be very strange to be told "Men in healthy relationships can and should be able to cry too their significant other." By saying that to me you are saying I am not in a healthy relationship and you imply that I am not a healthy man.

Do you understand that codicil to your argument, did you consider it?

[–]Is_Always_Honest 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry about your crap relationships. That's just dead wrong and unhealthy attitude overall.

[–]dedr4ever 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And your daddy didn't trust her.

[–]candyman420 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm your daddy, and you can trust me.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You can, but she usually won't care in anything other than a self-serving manner and it won't remain confidential; she'll talk to people about it seeking some kind of thrill. There are not just those who don't want to hear it. There are those who do want to hear it and then get a thrill out of talking about it with others in some strange form for exhibitionism.

[–]candyman420 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

well put

[–]MizterUltimaman 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perfectly normal to feel such love for your father, it was unreasonable for her

[–]majortom22 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be the end of my marriage right there.

[–]arc_flash_hazard 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the main reason many people don't open up about it. Unless the other person has been depressed, they wouldn't understand. My best friend was recently going through a serious depression and he told me he finally understands how I felt. It felt good to hear that they could relate to me.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I've had people say that to me about my depression and I feel like it comes from a place if ignorance. Those who have never understood the chasm of depression can't really understand how helpless you feel and how you can't just turn it off or think more positively to make it go away. I've found that it's better not to "throw your pearls to swine" in that case and try and find someone more sympathetic to discuss those things with.

[–]buttermetestes 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Depression is fucking exhausting though. Never more so than for the person experiencing it themselves. I've ruined some relationships with mine, and I've had to let people go due to theirs. I understand when somebody can't handle another's mental illness. I have a sibling that I haven't spoken to in years due to the way her bipolar disorder affects her. I feel terrible for her, and I'd love to help her, but I can't spend my life trying to do that. I understand when somebody tells me they can't be the one that's going to support and listen to me. Fortunately I have people in my life that are willing.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very, very true.

[–]flyingwolf -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Therapists are highly paid and highly trained to handle these things for a reason.

Expecting your friend or SO to handle it is not cool.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not to handle all of it and fix my problems, no. But to have a conversation about what's going on when they ask what's wrong? Absolutely.

[–]chedder 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Were you paying her for her emotional labour?

[–]ajburt1998 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't mean she was dismissing your feelings she just couldn't handle hearing your problems all the time. People wanna talk about other stuff than your depression sometimes

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]draculabaa 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

That seriously sucks. I hope that her behavior hasn't stopped you from opening up to others.

[–]Jealousy123 53 points54 points55 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Why would he keep opening up to others if that happens when he does?

That was a very stark lesson that he should NOT open up to others and should instead bottle his feelings up deep inside until he can pour them into an empty whisky bottle.

[–]Goatsac 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That was a very stark lesson that he should NOT open up to others and should instead bottle his feelings up deep inside until he can pour them into an empty whisky bottle.

"Male privilege"

Anyway, you like Savatage?

[–]ketrigan 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Great Album. IMO.

[–]TacoOrgy 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not the takeaway. Find actual or professional help for your depression. You can't expect your friends to become an emotional dumping ground for you all the time while you recover; its unfair to both parties.

[–]avicek 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is not helpful lol

[+]WhistlingDead -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Because it happened once. Do you make rules about social relationships based on one occurence?

"Oh, that dude didn't say hello back, I guess I'll never wish anyone a good day ever again"

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Alarid 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it only happened because he opened up to a close friend and expected comfort and understanding! What a fucking pussy.

A real man would risk destroying every relationship he has.

[–]nicholasferber 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Happens to a lot of men.

[–]Prometheus444 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not the best response...

[–]ajburt1998 -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It may not be sympathetic but it's certainly productive

[–]Prometheus444 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also a great way to push someone who is already depressed further into depression. If you don't have anything helpful to offer in a conversation like this your demeaning words may be better off unsaid.

[+]Prof_Acorn -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People wanna talk about other stuff than your depression sometimes

Like dem booties and tweks 👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good shit go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌shit right👌👌th 👌 ere👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌Good shit quality conversation 👌👌 👌👌

[–]mwobuddy -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FUK YISSSSSS

[–]Makonar 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In high school I had a GF - we talked a lot, and when I opened up about my depression, she broke up with me because I was "pissing her off"....

[+]WhistlingDead -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I broke up with a male friend who was opening up to me about his broken heart (from your words, it could even be you). I would have done the same thing if it had come from a woman. Sometimes you can't help people without damaging your own mental health - it can truly be "exhausting".

[–]smokeymctokerson 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? You can't even take the time to listen to somebody talk about what's bothering them because it may bring your mood down? That's some self-centered shit right there

[–]WhistlingDead -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

God forbid that I may have my own issues to deal with! No, I must just shut up and listen and nod.

[–]Liulfr 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah that's how a fucking relationship works. You listen to them, they listen to you.

[–]WhistlingDead 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. He didn't listen to me.

[–]neilalexanderr 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I get that it's difficult to sponge up other people's problems sometimes, and you certainly can't hope to fix them all, but what you don't understand is that people suffering from depression or from traumatic events often can't digest and process what's happening to them in a rational way. That's why it's so cathartic to get an outsider to rationally dissect things into smaller and more manageable chunks and to give a more positive view they simply can't generate by themselves.

It's not about you owning the problem, and it's not about you holding personal responsibility. You just need to be able to listen every once in a while. Good friends would be willing to.

[–]WhistlingDead 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I know, I am going through depression right now, and I was too when I broke up with this friend. That's why I don't take up people on their offer when they say "you can talk to me". Most people in a normal mood can only take so much from people with mental issues.

[–]Saturnix 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

can only take so much from people with mental issues.

Yeah, 1h cry from your SO after his father died. Definitely sounds like too much and definitely sounds like a mental health issue. What a pain in the ass to deal with, right?

Seriously, no wonder you're depressed. Is your standard for a human relationship, romantic or otherwise, that of a person who can't be arsed to console the other one for less than 1h after his father dies? Because a concrete brick is probably the closest thing to a human you're ever gonna have a relationship with, if that's it. Unless you'll find another person who's equally untroubled and uninterested about you.

[–]WhistlingDead 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're talking about /u/captshady's wife. I have no idea why you think I'm related to that case. But in case you want the details, I listened to a friend about breaking up with his GF of 5 years for a month until I couldn't take it and cut contact with him.

[–]broke-onomics 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you're mixing replies up fam

[–]Fuzzpot 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah yes, one of those "listen to me," "sorry I can't listen to you" kind of friends.

[–]WhistlingDead 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you read my post? I don't ask my friends to listen to me. There's only one person I ask that from. He's a therapist and I pay him €140 an hour.

[–]Fuzzpot 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes, one of those "listen to me," "sorry I can't listen to you" kind of friends.

[–]OnTheSlope 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As long as you're fine with being a shallow, fair-weather friend. Relationships can't exist without sacrifice.

[–]WhistlingDead 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's only so much sacrifice you can take until it turns to abuse. I spent hours on the phone with him, paid for the overseas calls from my own pocket, directed him to professionals who could actually help him.

I didn't say anything when he asked me to spy on his girlfriend. I spent a month receiving phone calls with suicide threats at 3am when I had to be at work at 7. But when he wasn't showing signs of improving, yeah, I cut him out of my life. Do you have any idea of the stress, to listen to someone thousands of miles away threatening to kill himself and there's nothing you can do? At this point yeah, I decided if he was going to go through with it, I'd rather not know about it.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, did not expect so many responses.

That being said, I fully recognize that I'm a minority. Being a very emotional person myself and having dealt with a lot of trauma in my past, I know how valuable it is to relieve yourself emotionally. Being the "more masculine" kind of woman, I made a lot of male friends, and because misery loves company, many of us were dealing with similar trauma. I always felt so much more connected to them when we cried together over whatever shit life was throwing at us that week.

For those of you who would chalk that up to teenage hormonal drama, a couple of years ago, my husband's dog passed away. She had been with him for about ten years and he loved her dearly. He was devastated at the news and cried a lot. I definitely felt much closer to him afterward and it, strangely enough, was a huge bonding experience for us.

As for the comment about only finding it attractive when "Hollywood hunks" cry, I actually feel the opposite. Most of the time I dislike on-screen male emotion because it feels forced. Unless it's a scene of extreme desperation or loss, I don't feel much of anything as an emotional response.

As far as these things go on a macro level, definitely don't expect women's panties to drop at the sight of a tear on a man. But it's a two-way street, you know? If you want a deep, emotional connection to a woman, it takes both of you being vulnerable for that to happen. And some--maybe most--women won't necessarily like it, because there is definitely this idea of the "man's man" who is super tough and never cries and takes bullets like a champ (which is a stupid image imo) and that's what women desire. Granted there is just as much of a stigma (in my opinion) of a confident woman seeming bitchy or an emotional one seeming hysterical.

There are shit expectations of both genders and shit treatment of both by the other that needs to end. Being vulnerable is hard--period. No one likes it and it's so easy to be rejected and never want to open up again. But unless you keep trying and wait to find the person who respects you for it, you're going to be in the same place you've always been.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe them. I think they believe it, but its so far outside of my experience with women that I assume she's lying to herself as much as she is to us.

None of us is who we'd like to think we are. And I've seen far, far too many women prod a man to open up to them, only to stab said men in the back over it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

maybe in america but in canada where macho manliness is... well its a lot less popular... you can find herds of people just like that :)

in america you gotta be the change you want to see in the world man :,)

[–]buttermetestes 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I have found just the opposite from personal experience. Emotionally connecting with women has been an awesome source of relationships, platonic or otherwise. Some women might be put off by it, but I don't think that kind of woman is somebody I want to be around.

[–]haplogreenleaf 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think there's a window. Too much emotion right on the outset and you may simply not be perceived as tough enough. Take too long and you're emotionally unavailable and distant. Opening up, to women, is a bonding thing. For guys its a trust thing.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's definitely a trust thing with women too, or at least it is for me. I've been burned a lot emotionally too and it can take a lot to trust someone enough to be vulnerable again. Though I absolutely agree with everything you've said.

[–]haplogreenleaf 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My wife and I were both coming out of bad relationships prior to meeting each other. There were elements of abuse for both of us, mentally and emotionally speaking. It took time for us to sort things out; a lot of the times we would get upset but it was because of past stuff and not what the other person had done per se. We made a short-hand of it and just said it was a baggage thing. Baggage stuff takes time, but the number of times we invoked it has dropped dramatically over the years as we work together and trust each other more. I think one of us has said it in the past year once, but that's about it. Time and work solves all kinds of issues.

[–]buttermetestes -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right. I definitely come on stronger here than most and some people aren't down with it at all. I also do it with a lot of dark humor and some distance from the real "feelings" aspect to begin with. Rarely to I ugly cry into strangers arms, but shit happens. By shit I mean gin. Gin happens. In the end, I've made great friends through it and have been told that it makes those around me a lot more comfortable opening up about themselves I think that's a good thing

[–]Blutarg 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Just what men want from women, platonic relationships!

[–]buttermetestes -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you missed the otherwise? I should have made it more blatant. I stuff hot muff every god damned weekend after I ugly, drunk cry in some random woman's arms.

But in all honesty, emotional vulnerability can definitely get you fucked, if that's all you're looking for. It has also led to stronger, more trusting relationships, including ones that involved sex you little horndog ;) Actually sex immediately after that kind of shit has consistently been good. It's emotionally charged and tears make great lube.

[–]perpetualtomato 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Another woman here. Definitely have thought the same about open men. Emotional intimacy is a huge part of romantic connections for me.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why on earth are you being downvoted? Just because a study of a group of people says one thing doesn't mean it's universal, it just shows the majority.

[–]AndresGleamingChest 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Dude have you actually even been in a relationship?

The vast majority of women want for you to open up to them, and it is required that you share your feelings for any long term relationship to function.

Obviously if you go on 2 dates with a girl and then breakdown in tears she's going to haul ass out of there, you come across as emotionally unstable.

But any woman you know well, and who knows you well should have no problem with it.

If this has been a problem for you, it may be that you're attracting the wrong kind of women. Don't pretend to be something you're not. If you are tacking on masculinity and bravado, the women you attract most likely will be into this kind of attitude, and may possibly be turned off by big displays of emotion.

I'm a fairly sensitive guy and make no effort to hide it. I may poke fun at myself for these things that some people feel are "feminine traits". But whenever I feel there is a benefit in sharing these feelings I do it.

I've cried in front of a pretty significant number of my girlfriends, and none of them have had any problems with it.

But at the same time you have to pay attention to their feelings as well. If your girlfriend's mother just died, don't come to her and make her listen to you stress out about something that happened at school or work.

Caring and emotional venting is a two way street. You can't expect someone to deal with all your shit, if you have showed no interest in dealing with theirs.

Maybe the problem here is you are viewing women as "vaginas" that "turn into the Mohave desert" when you display your feelings. They are human beings with their own problems and you can't just bombard them with your own without any consideration.

What do you expect them to do? Give you a sloppy blowjob because you cried at them?

Treat people with respect and any good person will treat you with respect.

[–]wwwhistler 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

i have cried in front of my wife and daughter exactly twice in the last 40 years.....i was teased unmercifully each time and vowed that it would never happen again. i, (and you) as a man am not ALLOWED to have those emotions....so no matter what women might tell you ....don't do it.

[–]buttermetestes 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm really sorry that happened to you. It's incredibly shitty of them to do that and I hope you have other people in your life that are more supportive of you. Nobody deserves to be made fun of for shedding tears or denied their feelings of sadness.

In my experience, most women aren't like that. There are people out there that aren't assholes.

[–]wwwhistler 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and in MY experience most women are exactly like that. they only claim they aren't because they know it's a shitty attitude

[–]LucifersHammerr 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor.

"Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up and talk about their feelings, and they are criticized for being emotionally walled-off; but if they get too real, they are met with revulsion. She recalled the first time she realized that she had been complicit in the shaming: "Holy Shit!" she said. "I am the patriarchy!"

http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/

The reason women cannot readily admit to contradictions that end up hurting others, such as telling men to be more vulnerable and then recoiling in disgust when they do, is they cannot face the public shame of being thought of as a bad person, one who hurts others. And without the ability to face their shame, they do not learn how to override these instinctual drives.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-women-repulsed-by-male-vulnerability-as-discovered-by-Bren%C3%A9-Brown

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The white knights of reddit don't care. They like to say that others are ignorant of women, but they say shit that really makes me wonder if they have ever even met one.

[–]majortom22 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's exactly it. Get emotional, sure. But don't get too emotional now. You really gotta toe the line on it, and, for me, I can't be emotionally intimate with someone where I'm mentally hedging my bets. It's an all or nothing affair, which is why I'm extremely rarely truly honest about what I feel.

[–]AndresGleamingChest 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well you should be communicating with them better.

Explain to them that it is not okay to berate any person for opening up, especially to close family members. Explain to them that both men and women have strong emotions and it is okay for both of them to display these. If you don't teach your daughter these things, no one else will and she will continue to think this is perfectly acceptable, you have to show her that a person can still be strong and cry, that masculinity and emotions are not mutually exclusive.

And your last statement is complete and utter bullshit. As a human being you are "allowed" any emotions that come your way, no one can tell you otherwise.

So no, I will never purposefully withhold my feelings from my loved ones. It is extraordinarily unhealthy for both your own mental health and your close relationships.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AndresGleamingChest 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think that's the truth at all.

Human beings, regardless of gender, have an immense capability for empathy.

Making massive generalizations like everyone in this thread is doing is plain ridiculous.

And it has less to do with how long you've known someone, and more to do with how well you know them and how well you trust them. It shouldn't be hard to tell if you can trust someone with your emotions.

[–]majortom22 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Andre, I like you because you've got the right idea of how it should be. And in rare instances, when you find the right people, this is how it really is. I've had it before -once.

But as far as the broader patterns of human behavior go -which is what we're discussing- this just isn't how it actually is

[–]majortom22 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like how you come out swinging Andre.

Yes I have been, including a 5 year relationship where I was engaged.

You're not making nuanced distinctions here which is where your analysis falls short. Yes, you should absolutely be emotionally intimate, but there are parameters for how this needs to be done if it's to be successful.

Your attempts to prop yourself up with these faux-righteous insights that aren't based in reality -that I "view women as vaginas" (I don't) for instance are baseless. You're hearing what you want to hear. That is short hand for something that cuts through all the minutiae and bull shit; does it work or not work on a deeply primal, human level? I say the same thing to men -does it make you hard, or does it make you go limp?

I've had a lot of good relationships and am friends with a lot of women. This is just the reality of humanity though. Crying, by and large, turns women off.

[–]OnTheSlope 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not calling her a liar either, but most men and women lack the self-awareness to make a claim like that. When egos are on the line, anything goes.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean maybe let's not be concerned about sex all the God Damn time. Maybe. Just maybe. Being vulnerable can be attractive to a woman because it another emotion to relate to. Who cares if she's not turned on by you being sad. You don't need to be 100% sex appeal 100% of the time.

[–]majortom22 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not about sex. The sexually related part is a stand in that indicates what something means to the core of the female or male psyche. It isn't a sex thing. It's that Sex is the "one ring to rule them all".

[–]rawbface -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think you're projecting way too much of your personal experience here. A crying man is not universally a turn-off for women. For many women, it's the opposite, and for sensible people, it's more complicated than just "man+crying=bad".

[–]Zokalex 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

A crying man is not universally a turn-off for women.

A crying man is not, a man that is way too much of a pussy and cries for everything is.

[–]rawbface 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well that's irrelevant and pointless. "Too much" of anything is too much, by definition.

[+]Zokalex -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You call it irrelevant and pointless yet feminists claim they like men like that. Men don't talk about their feelings, we deal with the problem and resolve it.

[–]rawbface 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do we? I didn't know you spoke for all men everywhere. I never voted for you.

[–]Zokalex -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm just saying what I see is a trend

[–]WhistlingDead 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you saying feminists claim they want men who are "pussies and cry for everything"?

[–]Zokalex -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They pretty much do

[–]jb_trp 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I'm a man who often wears his emotions on his sleeve. I have a bunch of close male friends that I meet with, and can be open, and often vulnerable in front of. Never once have I had one of them look down on me or tell me not to cry.

However, I've had women that I've dated who I've been vulnerable in front of and have allowed them to see me weep. I've had ex girlfriends make fun of me for it after the breakup too (even though in a years time they've only seen me like that once or twice).

Largely, I don't care what messages society sends to me. My opinions have been formed by my interactions with those who I've been closest to: I've learned that it's important to not cry in front of women, because I feel they'll lose respect/romantic interest/sexual attraction if I do.

[–]mrgoodnoodles 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you've just gone through a lot more shit in your years than I have, but you seem to be saying that you've experienced tremendous emotions and wept because of them quite a few times, in front of friends and in front of girlfriends.

I think this might be a direction away from the norm, and reading your last sentence I do agree with you, but I wonder why you have let yourself show those emotions in the first place before you could trust them? I've learned that you get way less judgment from same sex friends than you would from opposite sexes. YOur male friends know what their thresholds are, and in turn will be judge you much less harshly than a female friend under the same circumstances.

If my best friend cried, I wouldn't think less of him, because there isn't anything there that constitutes him being able to protect me, or lose romantic interest or sexual attraction, because it wasn't ever there in the first place. We are mostly on the same plain of masculinity, we know the things we can take emotionally (I don't actually have a best friend like this now, but I have had friends in the past where this was true).

When a woman experiences emotions from you that differ wildly from the norm of what she has seen, her reaction could be understanding or not understanding at all. And I feel that comes down to emotional intelligence when it crosses the bounds of gender. A woman who has that emotional intelligence, and intelligence in general, can see through the "men can't cry ever or they are pussies" fallacy and should understand and embrace this kind of behavior when your legitimately trying times have caught up to you emotionally.

For the women who aren't intelligent enough to understand your situation, well, it's a different story.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad you said this. Like I explained before, I am definitely an emotionally aware woman and spent a lot of my younger years analyzing those emotions. Maybe that's why it doesn't bother me and rather means a lot to me instead. I love helping people and, honestly, thrive when people share their problems with me, so I'm sure that has a lot to do with it.

I feel like we fail to remember how self-centered a lot of society is today anymore. It may not just be with men where this is an issue. I've found often that people just don't care about others' problems if it doesn't pertain to them. Maybe it's a lot of that, too.

[–]jb_trp 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

you seem to be saying that you've experienced tremendous emotions and wept because of them quite a few times, in front of friends and in front of girlfriends.

I wouldn't say quite a few times. In my adult life I've wept into from of my male friends a number of times over the course of a few years. In front of romantic parters, only twice, really. But both times have lead to the same outcome. If I've dated someone for the better part of a year, is it really such a bad thing to let them see you cry once in a span of 9 months? It seems it is, at least if you want them to stick around in the future (or at least not make fun of you for it post breakup).

[–]mrgoodnoodles 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yea, as I said, they shouldn't treat you like that for something that everyone is quite capable of and does. It just seems weird to me that this could potentially be a point of contention for a relationship. If a girl openly weeps in front of me, it's usually for something really fucking trivial. If I were to weep, there would be a good reason. I would want them to see it like it is, and think, wow something really bad must have happened and I should comfort him, rather than back away from the relationship.

[–]jb_trp 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

While I agree with you, I think sex/romantic relationships are not logical, but are driven by desires largely outside of our control. I've had women tell me, "I wish my husband was open with me like that!" But I don't know if they really saw their husband like that if they would be more attracted to them. I imagine either not much, or actually less attracted. Women are attracted to men who are strong, good leaders, confident, successful, etc. and not really emotional.

[–]mrgoodnoodles 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yes you are agreeing with me, in essence. I think that you shouldn't show those emotions in front of your woman. Women are attracted to just that, strong men, successful, confident. A loss of any one of these things is to be expected at some point temporarily. Every woman is different, but in a very primal sense they might not understand that they are not attracted to that kind of thing, even though they say they want their men to show some emotion once in awhile. However, if your mother dies and girlfriend or wife tells you to man up, she's a twat.

[–]ExpendableOne 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

I can't really disprove you one way or another but, even if I was to take you at your word and you were being completely honest with yourself, you would still be in a very clear minority. My statement was hyperbolic, so it wasn't really meant to be taken personally. I would like to think there are more women out there who don't judge men this harshly on this basis but I have never met a single woman(of any age/income/ethnicity) who has felt this way, except for the occasional case of "super hot rugged celebrity type is crying on camera, and it's making him even hotter because he's a super hot rugged celebrity type". Those women were typically far less forgiving towards your average man crying or being just being vulnerable in any way though.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ExpendableOne 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

As someone with several sisters and who has met numerous women over the years,

Are you basing this on how they acted towards you or how they acted towards other men(i.e. possible romantic/sexual suitors)? Because there's a big difference. Close relatives or friends who see you cry will generally feel very much empathetic and sympathetic, but that is also because it is a completely different relationship in a completely different dynamic.

who've told us to man up after the family dog died

Only crying under extreme circumstances, or major loss, are considered to be acceptable though? What about men who just cry because they are sad, hurt or depressed? What about men who cry because they empathize with others in a very personal way?

[–]buttermetestes 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There are going to be women on both sides of this issue, just like everything else. Some want to uphold masculinity and tradition. Some want us to live in a more accepting world. There are probably some that really do just dislike men, but they're a tiny portion and they have a microscope on them because they can be so ridiculous and the stupid things they say are easily used as political ammunition.

I consider myself a feminist. I have a ton of friends who would say the same of themselves. They would think that the article shitting on guys for crying is harmful for all.

[–]ExpendableOne 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I consider myself a feminist. I have a ton of friends who would say the same of themselves. They would think that the article shitting on guys for crying is harmful for all.

I have known a lot of women who have called themselves feminists and who might have even agreed with this on principle, but who held men to completely different standards in their personal lives(basically "it's okay if men cry but I would never date/fuck a man who cries"). Those women also typically viewed this general social/cultural disdain for crying men as a "people hate men who cry because women cry and society really hates women" problem because that is the only way they could really justify the issue within their narrative, often completely oblivious or indifferent to how they treated men in their personal lives. A lot of these feminists were also often quickly to scream "white male tears!" at men, whenever seeing them essentially breaking down over pain, mistreatment or trauma they might have experienced in their lives(plenty of which directly resulting from feminist activism/inequality).

[–]OnTheSlope 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some want to uphold masculinity and tradition. Some want us to live in a more accepting world.

This is where the disparity comes from. Women can have particular ideals that we should live in a more accepting world and on the surface they purport to have feelings in alignment with that ideal. They say they value men that show their emotions. The say it they are attracted to a man that cries. But you get to choose our ideals, you don't get to choose your feelings and often a man that cries and shows his vulnerability makes his partner feel insecure and although her ideals state that she should feel empathetic and love that man more and feel more attracted to him, she doesn't. She will feel the way she feels.

[–]buttermetestes -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

At least it's dissonance now. I think feminism is responsible for most of the discourse on masculinity in the west and its negative side effects on men. Before, "man up" would have been the only thing heard by men.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ExpendableOne 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not only that but, realistically, the vast majority of men wouldn't really care about another man telling him to "man up". Even if other men judged them negatively for it, they would take it with a grain of salt, because it doesn't really affect them in any real capacity(unless maybe in a professional setting). Constantly being judged by women for crying, however, actually does have a direct and tangible impact on men. It affects their romantic/sexual opportunities. It affects their capability to marry/reproduce. It affects their self-esteem and self-worth as they are directly judged by the opposite sex. It affects their social value, given that men are often judged by inherent worth to women(you can see this in virgin/nerd shaming too). When a large quantity of men tell you to man up, it's easy to tell them to fuck off. When a large quantity, or rather an overwhelming majority, of women tell you to men up, you either men up or further alienate yourself from those you love/desire.

[–]buttermetestes 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not trying to say that women don't tell men to man up. I do think it's less prevalent now than in the past (edit: in general, not only applied to women). Personally, the "man up" line has come from men a lot more frequently. Maybe it's just that I hang out with men most of the time, but it wasn't my mother or sisters or significant others telling me that. It was my father, my coaches, and male freinds/acquaintances telling me to keep from showing emotion.

[–]bufedad 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think feminism is responsible for most of the discourse on masculinity in the west and its negative side effects on men.

ok, you lost all your credibility here. Feminism which named it's evil after men (patriarchy), and it's hero after women (feminism) does not, has never, and will never have the interests of men at heart.

[–]buttermetestes -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why paint with such huge brush strokes. There are many university classes that you would label as feminist, meaning they're in the women and gender studies departments, that do exactly this. There are feminist seminars for men addressing the damage that denying they emotions causes.

[–]bufedad 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean to tell me, that people with no psychological education or training are presuming to teach men how to deal with psychological issues from an ideological bent of feminism?

And you think that's a good thing?

I'm not painting feminism as anything. I'm just pointing out what it is.

[–]ametalshard 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is exceedingly rare across the globe. Don't ever let that reality be forgotten. Most of the time, women shame or leave men if they show emotion. It might not be right away, but it is often caused by that show of emotion. This has to do with biology, as does most of gendered behavior, but the fact remains this is the reality for the majority of human male-female relationships.

Thankfully, with the advent of gender equality, it's more okay both for women to be more masculine (in this case, this masculinity manifests as acceptance of emotional male expression), and for men to be more feminine (allow themselves to be emotional, and also to show that emotion outwardly).

The sexual revolution did a LOT right; it caused quite a bit of turmoil, too, but it definitely resulted in a lot of positivity and progressiveness. This is an example of early feminism (and, by extension, any gendered movement's push for actual equality) benefiting both genders.

[–]buttermetestes 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Throw down some stats bro

[–]Larry-Man 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Am also woman. Depends on what he's crying about. I get told I'm stupid for crying for certain things and so it follows just any old tears will do. When one of my boyfriends cried about his grandma who passed I respected him more. When he cried during sad parts in movies I loved him more. When a man cries because he doesn't get his way it's not any more respectable when a woman does the same. Because I once dated a man who cried because he couldn't get what he wanted. Yeah, that didn't last. I don't expect men appreciate women who do it either.

[–]OnTheSlope 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I get told I'm stupid for crying for certain things

People need to lighten up on this shit, if you want to judge someone do so by their actions, not their emotions. No one chooses their emotions, they choose how they deal with those emotions, there's nothing wrong with crying.

[–]mbarkhau[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Context makes all the difference. Crying out of despair for example at a funeral is ok for a man. Crying with any hope/expectation of getting help tends to get reactions like "don't be a baby/man up".

[–]dungone 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Fake-tears about baby seals being clubbed to death at the North Pole might win respect from some women. Shedding a few tears while walking through molten lava to save a baby might also be appreciated. But it's exceedingly rare for women to react to anything resembling self-pity or weakness with anything short of scornful derision.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That attitude is part of the problem. I would not react that way. Is my reaction that of a minority? Probably. But don't make black and white statements about women if you don't want them to make them about you.

Edit for clarity.

[–]dungone 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

With all due respect, my statement was not black and white. More to the point, you cannot expect men to acclimate themselves to our society by opening up about their troubles in hopes that they catch the rare woman who happens to be feeling charitable that day.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

in hopes they catch the rare woman who happens to be feeling charitable that day.

That's kind of what I'm talking about. It's not charity, it's respect, open-mindedness, and sympathy or empathy. There is a reason pop culture is a thing--because it's popular. The popular opinion is that men need to be infallibly strong. The popular opinion is that women need to be domesticated, stay in the kitchen, and pop out babies. They're both terrible ideals and leave little room for individuality and growth. That's why I mentioned in my other comment that, in general, being vulnerable sucks. If women do it, we're being hysterical or clingy. If men do it, they're being effeminate and weak. It sucks. Both genders have really negative views about each other in various aspects and we all just need to learn to be more open and understanding about everyone.

[–]dungone 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not really sure where you are coming from on this. But let's agree on one thing: men don't owe it to you to approach you any different from any other women. Your unique views and perspectives don't make a difference in a society where the vast majority of women take a very dim view of men who are in the need of any sort of help.

The popular opinion

Men don't behave a certain way because "popular culture" tells them to. It's because they've tried to show their emotions and the pushback they got was caustic and unsympathetic. They had been castigated and they learned their lesson.

If women do it, we're being hysterical or clingy

This false equivalence just goes to show that you really don't understand the situation.

You don't really have sympathy or respect for men if you actually expect men to behave in a way that leads every other woman they might encounter (beside yourself) to abandon them. If you just looked at the situation - looked at men's behavior, looked at the rates of male vs female homelessness, male bs female suicide, etc., and stopped trying to blame this kind of think in men acting in accordance with popular culture, that would be respectful.

So to start, I would like it if you could realize that you are just one person and that men can't be expected to alter their behavior just on account of you.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, so many things going on here.

First of all, I'm not saying I expect anything or deserve anything different. I was only trying to point out the fact that not all women view men who share their emotions with distain. My whole point was that I saw young men who were in dire need of help and did what I could to help them.

Isn't that exactly what I said though? Society expects men to act a certain way--women desire men who act that way--if men act otherwise, they're looked down on. All of this because that's the picture society has painted of what a man should be i.e. the popular opinion.

It's not false equivalency. There is just as much of a stigma against women for being emotional and being told we just need to "get over" something as there is for men to "grow a pair." Is it more acceptable for women to show their emotions? Yes. But we, often, are defined by them. If a woman is more stoic, she's a bitch, not just a women who's less emotional than the average.

I'm not in the least trying to blame pop culture alone for this issue. I'm merely saying that it's a huge part of the problem. Why do you think I'm in this sub to begin with? Because I recognize that there are battles men fight that get swept under the rug in favor of women (among other things.) I find that disgusting. I was also only trying to point out that not all women feel disgusted by male emotion and was backing it up with personal experience. I was not at all expecting any behavior to change, rather just was making a point. Maybe ask first next time before assuming my intentions.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, a lot of things going on. I don't mean to be mean but you're missing the point and really haven't thought much through from a man's perspective.

[–]tempinator 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be honest, while I believe you, you're in the minority.

It's not an overt thing, like I don't think girls will (usually) explicitly get turned off by a guy that cries. But I've found a majority of girls want someone who's stable and grounded, someone who has their shit together and is confident. That's the sort of personality type that they like and are attracted to.

Crying undermines all of those things.

I've cried in front of a couple girls before and while it didn't torpedo my relationships with them, I could tell it made them uncomfortable and sort of...disappointed, maybe? Like I wasn't what they thought I was.

I'm not a big crier, honestly I wish I cried more, it's such a cathartic experience, but every time I have opened up in that way to a girl it's been universally negative.

[–]SarahC 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But did your vagina moisten?

Your thoughts are honest and true - and your deeper physical responses will carry on regardless. Would knowing some guy cries a bit effect your deep physical response?

Possibly, even probably.... you wont be aware of it, but sex with this guy will likely be less fulfilling than it would otherwise be.

[–]neart_roimh_laige 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's just a stupid thing to assume. No, crying doesn't get me wet. That's kind of weird. Doesn't it strengthen the bond between me and my husband which, in turn, strengthens our love and relationship in other ways? Hell yes it does. Just because I don't want to jump his bones while he's upset (like seriously, who would want to actually do that?) doesn't mean his being vulnerable with me doesn't bring about a net positive gain in our relationship as a whole.

[–]SarahC 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't mean crying should turn you on, I meant hours days later...

Although I didn't spot you were married - there's a lot more going on there, I agree with you.

I was thinking more the relationship driven by hormones that young people have sometimes - physical attraction, being funny, but not many other connections.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I think you're allowing the media to poison your views on this one. A lot of women I know are more than willing to be there for men in this situation.

[–]ExpendableOne 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I think you would be surprised exactly how many of those women would react towards emotional men, and then write it off as a "preference", when it really comes down to it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

What do you mean when you say 'write it off as "preference"'?

[–]buttermetestes 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think he means that they would say that they're just not into emotional men

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ah I see. I still disagree with him. The feminist media sure has corrupted a lot of women, but far from all of them. I wouldn't even say they've reached the majority, but that's just my personal experience.

[–]chadwickofwv 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This isn't a manifestation of feminism. It is inherent in female biology. To a woman a weak man has no value. This is nothing new.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Showing your emotions is not weak, though. Being sad on occasion and showing it is actually a sign of strength. Feeling your full spectrum of emotions is not just physically and mentally healthy. It also keeps you in touch with one of your most important survival mechanisms. Not knowing how to express and process your sadness and allowing it to become a personality or emotional disorder is the real sign of weakness. I mean, do you not see how often women swoon for the sensitive, artsy-type (musicians, painters, etc.)?

[–]chadwickofwv 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It does not matter whether or not it actually is weakness. All that matters is how it is interpreted by the woman subconsciously. Any sign of possible weakness is interpreted as weakness, it doesn't matter if it really is.

I do see how often women swoon for the "sensitive" artsy-type. The ones they swoon for are not sensitive, they are usually assholes to their core. The ones who are sensitive do not get that type of attention.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like I told that other dude, my personal experiences have differed drastically. That's really the only argument I can make. Even moderately intelligent women can recognize that sensitivity can be a valuable survival tool.

[–]OhJohnnyIApologize 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is inherent in female biology.

Translation: I know nothing at all about biology.

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's like with short men. When women are asked if short men should be treated the same way tall men should be treated, their answer is virtually always "ofcourse!", but then when you ask them "so would you ever date a short man?", they always answer in some variation of "ewww. no. never.". They don't see how these two sentiments conflict, how these predispositions affect men or how these personal negative predispositions stem from pre-existing social biases(which they are reinforcing/perpetuating).

It's the same thing with men showing emotion. When men show emotion and weakness, they are very quickly reprimanded and further emasculated, and they learn this lesson very early on(men who don't, simply make things harder, and more painful/traumatic, for themselves until the day they catch on). Feminism will then laugh at these problems or inequalities and then just legitimize the way women treat those men(because feminism isn't about equality but, rather, about prioritizing women and maintaining this victim/oppression narrative).

[–]OnTheSlope 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

do you know this by word or by action?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Both. Female partners of friends and female partners of my own.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When these are behaviours which are emulated by the greater majority of the population, it's more than just a problem of individuals. Speaking in absolutes is simply a method to address the situation as it is. It's a hyperbole, and I think everyone here except you understands that, but it's a meaningful hyperbole for the purpose of this conversation.

[+]IlII4 -13 points-12 points-11 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I think you(and a lot of people in this sub, given that this is the top comment here) are misunderstanding what is meant by the term 'patriarchy'. 'Patriarchy' is not synonymous with 'men'. It's not a person or group of people, it's a system in society that is upheld and reinforced by people of all genders.

[–]ExpendableOne 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you don't understand what patriarchy means, or maybe you are just misunderstanding how others are understanding it? Patriarchy theory, regardless of how it is upheld or reinforced, still assumes men in a position of power and authority, which is not only false(women have power and authority) but also contradictory(if women uphold and reinforce patriarchy, then they have power and there is no patriarchy) and harmful(calling it "patriarchy" only serves to further delegitimize and vilify men, and further victimize women at the hands of men).

[+]IlII4 -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you don't understand what patriarchy means, or maybe you are just misunderstanding how others are understanding it?

I posited that you misunderstand it because in your comment you asserted that because the article was written by a women, it couldn't possibly be patriarchal. That demonstrates a clear misunderstanding of what the term means.

Patriarchy theory, regardless of how it is upheld or reinforced, still assumes men in a position of power and authority, which is not only false(women have power and authority)

Here is a good, albeit slightly outdated, comment giving some statistics of the power balance in both politics and business in the US. It's clear that the majority of power in western society is held by men.

The fact that "women have power and authority" in a society does not mean that said society is not patriarchal. A patriarchal society is not simply one in which men hold literally 100% of the power.

but also contradictory(if women uphold and reinforce patriarchy, then they have power and there is no patriarchy)

As I said, women(as a class) do have power, but not as much power as men(as a class). (n.b., here I'm talking about men and women in the collective, I'm not referring to individuals)

harmful(calling it "patriarchy" only serves to further delegitimize and vilify men, and further victimize women at the hands of men).

Feminists do not use it to delegitimise or vilify men, only to describe the system in society which, on the whole, gives men the majority of the power.

[–]jrackow 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists do not use it to delegitimise or vilify men, only to describe the system in society which, on the whole, gives men the majority of the power

....

[–]Santaball 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Reading your stats, quick question. Although women generally "make" less money than men, they are and have been for decades the primary spenders of the economy. Spending like 70% of the money but earning around 30%. I also believe that women are a larger voting block than men. On top of that media is much more gynocentric than masculine. At what point is it a matriarchy?

Edit: on my phone, can get stats to back this up if you want.

[–]IlII4 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

With regard to the fact that women make up a larger portion of the electorate than men, this would go back round to my point that everyone in society upholds patriarchal values to some extent, regardless of gender(yes, even feminists). A day before the US election, I heard a woman on the radio saying that while she wasn't voting for Trump because she felt he didn't espouse Christian values that she held, she wasn't voting for Clinton either because she didn't believe a woman should hold the office. This is a fairly extreme example, but a huge number of women hold similar views, but lesser in magnitude. Almost everyone is more likely to perceive a man as a leader than a woman because we have all grown up in a society in which most of the leaders we see have been men and where the qualities that we value in a leader(such as confidence, strength, stoicism, etc.) line up with male gender roles. Feminists believe we should critically examine these gender roles in society and how they reinforce patriarchy.

I'm not so familiar with the spending statistics or the arguments surrounding it - I've not personally read any of the studies that determined these stats so I'm afraid I can't give a good answer on it. I would implore you to ask a question on it over at /r/AskFeminists. I'd certainly be interested in seeing some discussion on the topic!

It's important to remember that while these patriarchal gender roles result in men obtaining the majority of the power in society, it does not mean that they don't have negative implications for many men. While the idea that men are unemotional and shouldn't cry means that the male ideal lines up with the ideal for a leader, it results in a lot of men feeling that they cannot properly express their feelings, which of course has a lot of negative effects(which I'm sure you are familiar with).

[–]Santaball 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'll comment more thoroughly when I get home but I'll start with this. Men and women express themselves differently. Forcing men to act like women or "express themselves" in the same way as men is damaging and counter productive.

For the other point, so if the majority of the people have an idea that certain genders are better suited for certain tasks, why is it so important to change that, despite having no evidence that the outcome would be positive?

[–]IlII4 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Forcing men to act like women or "express themselves" in the same way as men is damaging and counter productive.

I never said I would like to "force men to act like women", I would like for the restrictive male gender roles to be broken down. Using the image in the OP, the idea in society that men should cry is very harmful to lots of men. I, and the vast majority of feminists, would agree that the hypocrisy in the image in the OP is terrible and that the Daily Mail is a rag.

For the other point, so if the majority of the people have an idea that certain genders are better suited for certain tasks, why is it so important to change that, despite having no evidence that the outcome would be positive?

If society puts men and women into such restrictive boxes, it will result in many people not being able to be themselves. Looking back a couple hundred years in our own society, if a woman wanted to eschew raising children and have a job instead, there were some very restrictive barriers to this. Over the past two hundred years, feminism has been very successful in breaking down many of these barriers, resulting in a more fair and equal society. Of course, there is still a ways to go.

The same is true for men, which is literally what the image in the OP is complaining about. Many men feel restricted by these gender roles.

[–]Santaball 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, here we go, wall of text! Thank you for reading it.

With regard to the fact that women make up a larger portion of the electorate than men, this would go back round to my point that everyone in society upholds patriarchal values to some extent, regardless of gender(yes, even feminists). A day before the US election, I heard a woman on the radio saying that while she wasn't voting for Trump because she felt he didn't espouse Christian values that she held, she wasn't voting for Clinton either because she didn't believe a woman should hold the office.

So basically this comes down to, yes women have the majority of the political power via voting, but since they don't vote or think the way I vote, then they are part of the patriarchy. Definition below, let me know if you see the contradiction.

Patriarchy is the term used to describe the society in which we live today, characterized by current and historic unequal power relations between women and men whereby women are systematically disadvantaged and oppressed http://londonfeministnetwork.org.uk/home/patriarchy

Sorry but for the spending stat I could only find this article that is fairly recent. I mean, honestly if you've ever been to a mall or shopping center the womens sections are generally much larger than the mens but lets not go with personal experience.

http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/u-s--women-control-the-purse-strings.html

If society puts men and women into such restrictive boxes, it will result in many people not being able to be themselves. Looking back a couple hundred years in our own society, if a woman wanted to eschew raising children and have a job instead, there were some very restrictive barriers to this. Over the past two hundred years, feminism has been very successful in breaking down many of these barriers, resulting in a more fair and equal society. Of course, there is still a ways to go.

I disagree with this. The reason men, in my opinion, are having more problems expressing their feelings because there are no more male spaces. Before feminism, men had clubs, golf courses and things where they could go and be men without the watchful eye of women. But now there are really no mens spaces. Maybe a strip club but that isn't really a male space. Also, there have always been women with jobs and careers before feminism. Yes, women did have to work harder (possibly) but it could be done. Most teachers were women, as were nurses, seamstresses, etc etc. I think the only difference between now and a couple of hundred years ago is that women now do not have the choice to stay home. Women now must work.

[–]OnTheSlope 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

women's power comes through passivity and cooperation, it doesn't look the same as male power and doesn't show when you measure masculine power.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]buttermetestes 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

that teacher is fucking savage

[–]978897897978 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Savage in the sense that she's basically a monkey in clothes. Not in the "clever" way you're implying.

God damn. This is why Trump won. Because you all really are no better than apes, are you? This is our white knight in shining armor. This is a bona fide white knight, get ya tickets right here. OF COURSE he's depressed. FUCKING A. OF COURSE. It's like a movie at this point, you can call it beforehand. He's depressed and spends his time batting for women. You can't make this shit up.

You...just...don't...get..it...

[–]buttermetestes 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No I'm not in any way trying to say what she did was right. I just meant that it was actually savage. Like it was fucked. I don't think it's good to promote that kind of direct animosity at all. It engenders more hatred on both sides

[+]buttermetestes -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry bro I just get off on triggering "nice guys". Not my fault if you can't get laid. I get how that's frustrating but just look at yourself. I wouldn't fuck you, and I fuck guys occasionally. I'mma ride yo bitch like my steed tho ya cuck. PM me if you want some sloppy seconds.

[–]Blazer9001 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/B4DNbjIVDhA

[–]Revoran -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"From Tammy Hughes", and here I though it was the patriarchy telling men not to cry.

Some feminists demonize men as the oppressors, but in actual feminist patriarchy theory it's perfectly possible for women to hold sexist patriarchal views.

It's not a literal patriarchy they are talking about as in a group of men. It's this nebulous concept of sexist views which women can also hold.

Of course patriarchy theory falls down in other ways, but yeah.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FatheroftheAbyss 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But remember, women are the real victims of war /s.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women lose their fathers, brothers and sons!

But you know, men totally don't have any of those things too.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And men don't come back from war with physical and psychological injuries. War they had nothing to do with instigating. And they weren't pressured into it by women handing them flowers and calling them sissies if they didn't fight.

Women are perfect, you see, and men are deplorable. And that's equality, if you lack any and all logic and reason. And anyone who doesn't agree is a misogynist.

(The /s is too big to fit through the internet, obviously)

A new dark age is upon us, sadly.

[–]Daemonicus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

PTSD has been stolen by feminists. It purposely devalues actual PTSD, and inflates pseudo-PTSD, like what Lady Gaga is currently complaining about.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]HoundDogs 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A feminist with a theory is like a 19th century priest who performs exorcisms.

It only works on the truly initiated believers and you get the feeling that if it DID work, the problem was probably bullshit to begin with.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]TenFortyMonday 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, absolutely. First point of reference when I learnt about this subject is look at the suicide rates in blue collar jobs (manual labour construction type). A huge issue in my country is "tradies" (colloquial term for above) committing suicide since they simply don't have the support system around them to cope (which is understandable).

[–]djc_tech 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think I read somewhere this time of year is when a lot of suicides happen for males because they're spending the holidays alone while their ex-wife and kids are together.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]HoundDogs 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Nice guy" routine.

[–]zZE94 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I once hooked up with a girl and drunk at night in bed, we both hugged each other and just cried for an hour, just like that. We both while barely knowing each other, let out our emotions and trapped feelings because of our own respective pasts. The music helped. We've been in touch ever since.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]zZE94 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, we did but months after that incident.

[–]zZE94 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you were implying that we cried because of a failed semester, then no. I don't believe a degree can decide my future and I was least bothered about it.

We both cried because we had bottled up feelings regarding our past romantic relationships which were not good for either of us and because of our terrible relationships with our families and parents.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Men will be more openly emotional the moment society gives them a genuine reason to. There's always so much talk about "toxic masculinity" and "being more sensitive" which we all know just means "why can't men act like women", but the men that do never gain wealth or romantic attention or any other marker of success as a result of such behavior. In fact often time it proves detrimental.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you mean to say men and women are... different? And not equal in some respects ????

[–]Bascome 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This campaign encourages men to act like women and deal with emotions like women.

Might that not lead to more male suicide when it doesn't work?

Let men be men.

[–]iainmf 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women have higher rates of depression and anxiety and reportedly attempt suicide more often (it's hard to know for sure, but that's the feminist line).

So I don't see why acting like women would be good for men.

[–]978897897978 90 points91 points92 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Just shut up and kill yourself you dumb man.

We're sick of hearing about your shit. Shut up and kill yourself. We don't care. Now give us shit and do things for us and be out quiet slave.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

sounds like a plan

[–]Prometheus444 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sounds like a woman.

[–]LeighGriffaldo 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kinky 😉

[–]abrin7 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Never more so than for the majority of women want for you to open up again.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"I like a man who is sensitive" until they realise how turned off they get by sensitive men.

[–]tempinator 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sort of understandable. Confidence, having your shit together, stability, (for some women) a dominating or commanding presence sexually, these are all things many women find attractive.

Crying directly undermines literally all of them. Not very surprising it turns them off.

[–]mwobuddy 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Single mothers have really fucked up a generation or two of men, because they actually listen to what their mothers tell them what women want. "nice, giving, generous, helpful, etc", then they do that and receive negative results.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VM1UA0pCMQ

Skip to the part where he says that if you punish someone for doing something nice, they are not going to do it again, and if you punish them for lots of nice things they do, the relationship falls apart. We have a social relationship, a general one which extends to groups of people.

Men vs women, there's a relationship whereby guys have continued to think that being nice and doing the right things gets rewards, then they see PUA-type stuff actually get the rewards, then they turn bitter. They claim they can't get laid or get a girlfriend, while "assholes" do, and then they are shamed for "thinking they can act nice to get laid/a girlfriend", by those very same men and women who are getting laid, and GETTING LAID FOR SELFISH REASONS, E,.G. BECAUSE THEY WANT TO GET IT, or getting a girlfriend/boyfriend for selfish reasons, .e.g. they want to get it.

The "nice guy" complainer is the antithesis of everything a woman wants because its a guy who is complaining that he's not thriving in the world, (getting laid or a girlfriend), and therefore not only is he worse because he can't succeed, he's even worse than that because he complains about it.

if you're a loser, stay quiet if you have testicles, because you're only going to make women hate you more.

[–]Potomato 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am generally a nice person, and if i'm in a relationship, i make her my number 1 priority. Maybe i'm a little needy, but i never even kissed a girl or got laid till i was 21. Since then i have had 3 relationships. My most recent one, i fell in love with her, first girl i ever loved and told her i loved. I did everything i could for her, spent all my money and always made time if she needed anything. All i wanted in return is to have quality time with her. over time she answered her phone less and texted less, then after trying to see her for a month she texts me and says that she is engaged to her ex-boyfriend who she has been talking to the whole time we where together. I loved her and she told me that she loved me, she lied. Her fiance is a bum asshole who left her 3 times to go fuck other bitches. no future, no money. but here i am sleeping alone at night.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I assume you broke the rules of "healthy' relationships, which is not to get angry or upset with her for being less and less available, and not to express how you want different. Continuing to reward bad behavior leads to its increase.

[–]Potomato 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I expressed what i thought where issues in the relationship a few times, and she would always have some reason and it seemed she knew i was totally in love with her so she walked all over me.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ametalshard 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Public crying? What public crying are you talking about?

The entertainment television shows which specifically market every second of their productions to maximize profit? You're tired of that?

You're the one who chose to turn on the tv and watch it on a certain channel at a certain time. No one's forcing you to do that. Not a single step of that is forced.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ametalshard 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You've yet to show how it's a problem for anyone besides people who want to see it. Almost everything gets posted on social media.

In your opinion, what is and what isn't "attention whoring"? Just stuff you don't like?

Not to mention, it's certainly not everywhere I look. My social media is not the same as yours. Maybe it's similar, and an argument can be made for homogeneity in social media, but that's not what we're talking about. You make a choice to follow people who post certain content.

[–]The1KrisRoB 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Almost everything gets posted on social media.

Not true.

Social media is 90% curated views of someone's life. People generally only post the good stuff, and the majority of bad stuff they post is for attention.

That is why they warn people suffering from depression to stay away from social media. From the outside all you see is what people want you to see, their perfect lives that you're not living. It's real life reality TV. Everything is amazing, and if it's not that because we want your sympathy and attention.

[–]ametalshard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay? Maybe not literally all of human knowledge, but certainly more than videos of people crying; I would know, as I have a huge social circle and never see such content, even when most of my circle is very liberal.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Prometheus444 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm failing to understand where you are coming from as well. I am not seeing this "Everywhere you look now, there's some moron crying over something and posting the video to social media."

[–]ametalshard 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your opinion is directly at odds with men's rights. This isn't a vacuum; while your opinion is valid, it's problematic in that it represents a serious issue men have had to deal with for hundreds of years around the world.

Your opinion is like that of a Catholic posting in a SNAP sub:

I'm tired of all these adults publicly complaining that they were raped as children by Catholic priests. Why can't they just be themselves? They don't need to complain in public about it!

Yeah, we've made some progress on it. But we aren't even half way there. Not even close...

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ametalshard 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have little else to say here. Honestly, I've only seen ONE video of a guy crying in front of a camera in any men's right's context. Maybe you've seen a LOT more, in which case, I can only request that you put us in touch with your wider circle of friends somehow, because I'd be very interested in meeting them.

Other than that, sorry you aren't interested in the opinions of your friends. But it's cool you apparently still care enough to keep them, despite being so tired of them. Must suck a little.

[–]Nowin 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can we just start letting people feel how they want?

What if their feelings infringe upon my feelings!? /s

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I misread this is as, "We don't need to encourage people to cry, or shit, or hide their feelings" and immediately thought about how pleasant it would be to have someone to encourage me to take bathroom breaks throughout the day.

[–]LowestFormofFlattery 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather kill myself than talk about feelings.

[–]mayorjimmy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Crying, what are you a fag?

Guys don't cry because of this.

[–]captshady 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5e1HG5Xkgk

[–]50PercentLies 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists only want men to cry in their heads. When they actually see it they have the same reaction men have when they see tons of women crying over stupid shit, but somehow only one of those scenarios involves sexism.

[–]RZephyr07 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Should cross post this to r/newscontradictions

[–]soundsaboutWRIGHT 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair it's two completely different issues. Sometimes when people cry on reality TV it's stupid and they should be ridiculed for it. The other article talks about people who are actually suicidal which is a serious thing.

[–]soda_party_euw 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You should post this to r/CringeAnarchy too

[–]webleytempest 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://therationalmale.com/2013/11/13/empathy/

[+]mochacola -67 points-66 points-65 points 9 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

Ad is trying to get rid of 'toxic masculinity'. Article is illustrating privileged men crying 'male tears'. What's your point? I don't see it.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

I'll probably get banned from a load of subs for posting here, but you are being sarcastic right? It's hard to tell these days.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

some mods will ban you from their sub reddit if they see you post in subreddits that they deem 'wrong-think'.

[–]EADGod 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes, the "we've deemed everybody in this sub bigots, and are intolerant of their dissenting opinions." trick.

The newest trick in the book.

[–]Generic-username427 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's forward thinking by them, can you imagine actually having to tolerate someone else's opinion?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm now posting here just to see what subs ban me. :-)

That happens a lot. Also people that have no argument that will look at your post history and say "well you posted in (wherever) so your opinion doesn't count." Ahhhh Reddit

[–]Anaxagoras23 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist talking points on the Men's Rights Movement claim that it's a hate movement.

From their point of view men have it great and women need more stuff to achieve equality, still, so anything that benefits men at a potential disadvantage to women is oppression. They also view the idea that men should be able to defend themselves against women who are actively assaulting them as promoting violence against women.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

As others have said; some subreddits ban people for using other communities. It's a very totalitarian way to run a subreddit and does nothing to actually help people understand each other.

For example I am anti-Trump but sometimes post in the Donald subreddit, but because of that I am banned from EnoughTrumpSpam. I also got banned from a load of subs for posting in KotakuInAction.

To make this political; from my experience it's the subreddits run by the American left supporters that I get banned from. They're censorship happy, which is sad to see as a European liberal.

[–]MayorMcCheesepls 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's odd to me that liberals seem to either be very politically correct, or super loose with extremely offensive humor.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say they were two different groups. The ones I meet who are PC tend to get upset if I say that I'm 1/8th "nigger" as a joke (since I am 1/8th black), but are fine using "white male" as an insult against me, and can't see the cognitive dissonance there, especially when I am actually disadvantaged because of my racial background.

Liberalism sadly is cannibalising it's own members at the moment.

[–]978897897978 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're both.

It depends on the target. They're all about identity politics.

That's how liberalism settled on the Duluth model, which Bernie Sanders championed in the "Violence Against Women Act."

In the Duluth Model, violence against a man by a woman is declared violence against a woman by a man, because of institutionalized patriarchy. This is a real bill, this is a real system, this is a real set of laws.

Liberals are both politically correct and extremely offensive because only some people are people to liberals. There are no bad strategies, only bad targets.

This is what liberals do with real laws, in the real world. What they do in theory matters not.

[–]ametalshard 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I got banned from the_Donald just for posting poll responses from Trump voters and nothing else.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Oh yeah, they ban people a lot too. I've managed to, on a previous account, openly disagree with them on huge issues and somehow get away with it. EnoughTrumpSpam on the other hand outright banned me for associating with the_donald. I don't consider it justifiable. Neither group is looking to reason with the other.

It's similar to how many subs now just lock threads that get any commentators being racist. They lock threads with 1000+ comments because a few bottom feeders broke the rules. It's like some 2004-era PHPBB forum on Reddit these days.

[–]EADGod 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've managed to, on a previous account, openly disagree with them on huge issues and somehow get away with it.

I've noticed that if you do it politely they usually have someone in that community step up and give you well thought out counterpoints.

Of course you'll get the occasional douche-nozzle but it's the internet soooo.

Surprisingly enough, I've been much more welcome in r/The_Donald than I have in any left leaning or Hillary subs.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. They're pretty convinced they're correct so they can handle some dissenting is my take on the matter. The US (online) left seems to feel it has a lot more to prove, and pretty much does themselves a huge disservice by censoring since it's fundamentally illiberal to be doing that. I personally thought Sanders was the best of the lot so by the end of it I was mostly watching with disbelief.

[–]ametalshard -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Locking threads is a simple way to deal with problems that have no easy solution. KiA has become overrun with racist Trump supporters, for example. What can you do about that?

This sub (/r/MensRights) has a lot of alt-righters. For some reason, Milo gets upvoted here whenever he's posted, even though he is outspoken both against Men's Rights, and gay rights. I wish more of those threads were locked, because all of that content is expressly anti-MRA.

Why do we love anti-MRA content in an MRA sub? This makes no sense. There is no opposing viewpoint that could be helpful here. It's literally self-hate.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because you shouldn't be "solving" this problem. If people are racist then let the downvotes and moderation team deal with it on a case by case basis. It's too easy to control the message if you can just get a thread closed down by being racist. It's exactly the sort of chilling effect that KiA is meant to be against.

Reddit was perfectly fine before locking was a moderator power. Now it's just encouraging this place to become even more locked down, owned by a small group of elites, and ran like a old PHPBB style board with powermad little idealogical teenagers running it. It's unpleasant and drives away legitimate conversation.

If a topic doesn't belong in a sub then delete it outright. Locking leaves it there for everyone to see and pollutes the sub. I am not suggesting letting the sub have off topic topics, but the comments should be open discussion. We should welcome dissenting views in any sub's comments, and anyone being hostile should be banned for hostility. Disagreements and alternative viewpoints are not hostility of course.

I also see you're a mod of some subs, I do hope you see my point on this. I've moderated very large forums in the past and know from first hand experience how much effort it is, but know from it that abusing mod powers to save time or push a viewpoint is just damaging to everyone.

[–]ametalshard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a topic doesn't belong in a sub then delete it outright.

Yeah... you think the mods are ideological teenagers? Wait till you delete alt-right content. You've never even fucking seen a teenager.

We should welcome dissenting views in any sub's comments

Sorry; I wasn't referring to comments. I'm referring to complete sub takeovers where the highest-voted posts are completely against the entire point of the sub, and the moderators are left helpless to deal with it. Like KiA going full-Trump, and /r/MensRights going anti-Men's Rights with their support of the alt-right homophobes and male-shamers (political horseshoe in full effect).

KiA didn't really have a choice. They could have decided to ban homophobia and racism, but then they would have had to ban thousands of accounts. It's not their job; they shouldn't be forced to sit there banning every alt-righter who had nowhere to go after CoonTown was deleted but then was emboldened with Trump's rise.

[–]contractor808 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By the way, you'll only be notified of being banned if you have already posted in the sub that bans you.

[–]AloysiusC 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some subreddits automatically ban anyone who posted here or in other places they deem as hateful. Check out r/feminism. You might already be banned there.

[–]mochacola 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah. I was showing how a femnut would still have no awareness of contradictions or hypocrisy in their bullshit belief even if you place them together.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought so. Still, the downvotes are definitely fitting for something that so well demonstrates Poe's Law. ;)

[–]rawbface 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not a single sub worth visiting will ban you. You're safe.

[–]EADGod 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ad is trying to Bring attention to the things that cause male suicide. Contradictory article is mocking "grown men blubbing like babies".

FTFY

Do you get it now?

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]EADGod 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The point here is, that if a woman on the show cries, it's just another woman crying on TV.

If it's a grown man, he's blubbing like a baby.

Which directly contradicts the message in the first article.

Regardless of what they're crying over.

[–]SpaceCowboy734 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Go back to r shitredditsays you troll.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter