so recently i was told that my understanding and experience of men comes from the fact that i "only dated chads". this is of course ludicrous as "chad" is some jock or frat boy i wouldnt have crossed the street to pee on if he was on fire

i wanted to share a random video of the type of hardcore show i went to in philly in the 80s, to illustrate what boys looked like then. this was a band i saw several times, they were local.

now, this is what the punk scene looked like. nothing fancy, just guys thrashing to an aggressive band, they rarely even looked postcard-from-england-in-1977 punk. the thing i wanted to draw peoples attention to is...NONE OF THEM ARE FAT EFFEMINATE BUTTERBAL NERDS WHO LOOK LIKE THEY NEVER WENT OUTSIDE. i could share 100 videos of 100 hardcore shows form the 80s and youd see the same thing

are the boys thrashing in this video "chad"? none of them were jocks. none of them lifted. yet through the magic of "somehow" all of them were simply "not fat" and "not a fag". that was it. not "chad", no status, they rarely had cars, just skateboards. this represented like ALL of them. these were not "the popular kids" in school, or the dorks, they were just dudes. if in fact the entire philadelphia hardcore scene was composed entirely of "chads" then the whole concept becomes ridiculous

ok so the point. are millenial guys just big fat vealpen beta fag weeaboo nerds who were raised by single moms and is "chad" simply the only guy around now who isnt a butterball dork? is soft nerdy effeminate obesity being accounted for in the "incel" phenomenon

what do you think?

edit: if not fat is it this new weird generational social anxiety everyone seems to report?