TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The dangers of echo chambers

lost_2_apathy

July 25, 2015
529 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The dangers of echo chambers
Author

lost_2_apathy

Upvotes 529
Comments 207
Date July 25, 2015 6:02 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3ekvmn/the_dangers_of_echo_chambers/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-dangers-of-echo-chambers.34984
https://theredarchive.com/post/34984
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by lost_2_apathy

It feels as if women get pregnant on purpose just for supplemental income. Gents, don't stick your dick in crazy.

44 upvotes
February 3, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

FR: Dancing In The Undertow: metal chicks are easy (LONG)

31 upvotes
December 14, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

T-shirt and jeans aren't going to cut it anymore...

10 upvotes
April 2, 2014
/r/askTRP

Student feminists express opposition to rape PSA, school has no intentions on retracting as of now.

8 upvotes
October 12, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

How to respond - She's fishing for more compliments

7 upvotes
August 1, 2014
/r/askTRP

Looking for good reading material for prospective house chefs.

7 upvotes
March 13, 2014
/r/askTRP

It's been a viable sexual strategy since...

3 upvotes
February 2, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]jdoe5 264 points264 points264 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I've been waiting for this post for a long time.

I love TRP, it literally changed my life as many people on here will testify. I have so much to thank for it.

But for all the shit people talk about feminism and white knights just being clueless people who don't look at facts and just keep perpetuating beliefs, there are a lot of idiots on here who do the same thing with TRP beliefs. Like come on, the reason you ended up here is because you started questioning the social status quo, don't just become stupid again because you found something that finally makes sense.

Like OP said, almost every theory or belief is bound to have some hole or shortcoming, and TRP is no exception. Greet everything with a healthy amount of skepticism.

[–]1iluminatiNYC53 points54 points55 points 11 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Glad I'm not the only one. A little bit of self-reflection of one's biases is always needed.

[–]CrackityDiggity1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ideological thought is the death of rational thought. Group-think is dangerous. You have to think for yourself, never accept any theory uncritically. Always be willing to abandon your beliefs if new evidence arises to contradict them. You can listen to others and consider their points of view, but at the end of the day you have to make up your own damn mind.

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points4 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Redpillc0re-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would you accept the ban it if he had said "it's against god's will to have sex with another man's wife?"

[–][deleted] 49 points49 points49 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Redpillc0re22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

unfortunately most of the subjects discussed here are considered taboo for academics and there is simply a paucity of research around them. thats why you will have to tolerate some broscience until the academia removes its tampon.

The intelligence example is a great one, it shows the way in which academia has bent itself to the feminist narrative. Intelligence is now only vaguely defined , to hide the obvious conclusions that women don't do great at analytical skills.

[–]Elesh4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This thread is giving me a lot more faith that TRP has some critical thinkers.

I got karma eviscerated for suggesting that women are not inferior in a thread about TRP posting tone. It was a reply to an endorsed contributor who was self-citing. TRP has observed methods that work in the real world, it's real strength is its empirical basis and respect for reality. But you can weave those observations to make theories that agree with any particular social agenda. That's one anecdote agreeing with the echo chamber theory.

Thanks for the book recommendation (The Blank Slate). Put it on my to read list.

[–]bambooooooodmad 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I thoroughly enjoy and deeply respect Steven Pinker. One thing he does that I find interesting for a professor of psycholinguistics is the way he often uses 'she' and 'her' in place of 'he' and 'him' when talking about the ambiguous unidentified person. I take it as acknowledgment of the flaw in our language regarding the default assignment of the masculine gender and also some amount of pandering to the feminine. I wonder why he doesn't employ the gender neutral 'they' etc. Regardless, he is absolutely brilliant and entertaining.

[–]kinklianekoff0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I take it as acknowledgment of the flaw in our language regarding the default assignment of the masculine gender and also some amount of pandering to the feminine.

I agree. I wouldn't mind it as much if we wasn't so entrenched in a culture of twisting everything towards the feminine. Somewhat related is the swedish usage of "hen" which is supposed to be a neutral compromise between the feminine "hun" and masculine "han", but just sounds ridiculous considering it is such a recent forced construction. Forcing language like that is bordering on thought policing.

[–]oldmanwho 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

if it is so best, post your insights. let's test that assertion.

just make sure that their your improvements. if you apply them well, you'll get something better than Blank to the sidebar.

[–]needmorefat23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Like come on, the reason you ended up here is because you started questioning the social status quo

Some people got here from questioning pre-existing liberal beliefs. Those people still have pretty much liberal-to-libertarian beliefs in that they support gay marriage and all that jazz, but now it's slightly tempered with some more conservative and more cynical ideas about human nature and gender.

Others got here because they were already conservatives, and reactionary ideas provide a more intellectually sound defense of what they already believed than what mainstream conservatism can. Those people didn't question their personal status quo at all.

You'll notice this trend everywhere. Hyper-liberal people from liberal areas are often unreasonable, but liberal people in conservative areas are often much wiser than their peers (and similarly conservatives from very liberal families and areas)

Unfortunately, among those who subconsciously notice this phenomenon it lead to ideological hipsterism where people have contrarian beliefs just to show off how smart they are, so you get a cycle of contrarians, meta-contrarians, meta-meta-contrarians... (Tumblrinas are contrarians, Redpillers are meta-contrarian, and so on.)

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, among those who subconsciously notice this phenomenon it lead to ideological hipsterism where people have contrarian beliefs just to show off how smart they are, so you get a cycle of contrarians, meta-contrarians, meta-meta-contrarians... (Tumblrinas are contrarians, Redpillers are meta-contrarian, and so on.)

That's a really inciteful viewpoint, it's just an endless cycle..

[–]needmorefat6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

The worst part is, it's really hard not to fall into the trap.

Because the nature of the trap is: "Hey, I'm aware of your ideology, and mine explains and transcends it."

Liberal academics completely understand mainstream conservatism, and have dissected it to pieces, shown all its flaws. Mainstream conservatives, meanwhile, don't even realize how thoroughly outwitted they are. They just repeat tired aphorisms as their traditional culture slowly dies.

Neo-Reactionary movements like theredpill have totally dissected aspects mainstream liberalism, and the liberals have zero awareness of reactionaries and are totally oblivious to how cliche they sound whenever they open their mouth. One by one, neoreactionaries gain ground.

And me, well... I feel like I've totally understood TRP, totally understood the dark enlightenment. moldbug, down to the core. I can see all its glaring flaws, its completely idiotic logical holes. But... really, haven't I just gone one level higher? And is there an even smaller group of elites which is even now laughing at me?

You can't really escape it. The truth is, everything that comes out of my mouth, your mouth, every single thinker on this forum, is mostly nonsense,speculation, towers upon towers of ideas and counter ideas which are really just idiocy and false premise when you get down to it. The only part which means anything is the hard data.

[–]Endorsed ContributorMarsupian3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why I think the core of trp is about getting a clear view of reality. A lot of posts are a variation of "here is what media showed us, this is what happens in real life."

The explenation why and the possible solution is not important. I also think often posts are written without judgement but people assume it's criticism. When people post about af/bb, hypergamy and other touchy subjects it's not necessarily a criticism of women. In my opinion it shouldn't be, we are not here to judge.

In my eyes this sub is about correcting a romanticised view of reality and exploring how to achieve your goals and give meaning to life in this brave new world.

You don't have to have a particular ideology to appreciate that and contribute.

I do think that because the focus is obviously on where reality differs from what society tells you it can come across more black and white as it is. I think everyone is inherently selfish (the root of hypergamy and awalt) I also believe in compassion, loving everyone and everything and cooperation. Selfishness is a true expression of animal nature and in my eyes something beautiful.

This is an example of how you can observe reality (hypergamy and awalt) but instead of it being judgemental like is usually assumed it's just an observation and appreciated for its beauty.

To conclude I think observing without judging is the solution to not becoming the next neo reactionary movement. If you are free from a presumption of how things should work and what reality should be you are free to observe the true nature of reality and through that find your own way in this world.

[–]kinklianekoff0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only part which means anything is the hard data.

Unfortunately, that severely hinders what we can arrive at and limits our potential.

A healthy skepticism coupled with rationality and logical conclusions with not too many steps removed from facts is what makes the most powerful write ups.

"Hey, I'm aware of your ideology, and mine explains and transcends it."

The take away point from this thread is to try to not one up the -isms and movements.

For example, I accept the value of the core family unit from the 50's which can be considered part of conservatism, but I also accept that day is past, it's just not feasible as a goal anymore.

The truth is, everything that comes out of my mouth, your mouth, every single thinker on this forum, is mostly nonsense,speculation, towers upon towers of ideas and counter ideas which are really just idiocy and false premise when you get down to it.

If everything was false premise and idiocy, you wouldn't be here. It's precisely the rational dissections of hard facts, the straight talk, that is the appeal of RP. It's almost addictive. It's also why we should remain critical of what we read here.

[–]Saiserit0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Whatever the fuck is going on is not predictable through any kind of rational model I know." But this...it's a special kind of magic. For me, it was like figuring out there is no God all over again.

[–]DrunkenOni 9 points9 points9 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

RP is an ideology and it suffers many of the same weakness any ideology suffers from like group think, fanatical adherents and shouting down any dissent as invaders. I love RP but you're absolutely 100% right and it always saddens me when I see it.

[–]cariboo_j13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah I was debating the merits of basically the cookie cutter model of "alpha male" that TRP puts forward and questioning whether constantly chasing pussy is essential for the happiness of every man. I'm leaning more towards MGTOW.

The OP of the thread quickly resorted to ad hominems. Accused me of being a concern troll, low testerone, a woman (lol), anything but directly engage my arguments. It was pretty disappointing.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think most people at TRP still have an end goal of meeting a "unicorn" whether they want to admit it or not; that's what they want and it's what they long for. You can tell because so many posts strictly talk about women this women that and all posters' strong adherence to the concept of the "nuclear family" which usually require a woman.. who you love.. I think that Red Pillers would have been Lords or traveling merchants in ancient times since a lot of what we discuss has to do with personal reputation, generating wealth, and generally being an established desirable (sexy) male.

TRP is like moderate-conservatism where MGTOW is like far-right or far-left. The impression I get from MGTOW is most of them simply aren't interested in playing the game that is "life". A lot choose to live minimally, not have children, no relations with women or very casual relations, and "ghost". A lot of these guys I feel would have been wandering sages or monks in ancient times.

Both schools of thought essentially teach men to live free; but through different means.

[–][deleted] 92 points92 points92 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AlphaJesus17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fuckin deep. Great observation.

[–]vys1 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's true, and quite disturbing as well.

[–]PMME_YOUR_TITS_WOMAN6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh god. I hear about Fight Club being used by people as an example to be made fun of, "the guy who watched Fight Club and it totally changed his worldview, man" type of thing.

But it's perfect here.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

Taking the pill was the best thing that ever happened to me, drastic improvements to say the least. As crazy as it sounds, it also helped me overcome negative views I had toward women; mainly because they all stemmed from that "nice guy-ness".. I expected women I found attractive to love me without putting in more than a dog shit of effort to my appearance, physique, social skills etc..

I notice a lot of posters who love to just say "AWALT" about everything, but truth is: "AWALT for a reason". All women will leave a loser guy who doesn't bring home the cheese. All women will stop fucking a guy they don't find sexy anymore. All women don't view beta men who flock to them like a lost puppy dog as "sexy".

"AWALT" is something that has a negative connotation here suggesting that women are shallow opportunists who have a heart made of coal.

Wouldn't you lose interest in your girlfriend if she let her body go and you had options yourself?

Wouldn't you dump your girlfriend if she was financially irresponsible and refused to go to work. Or if you were okay with supporting her; if she didn't do chores around the house, prepare meals, or some type of productivity toward your benefit as a couple?

If you were a woman would you find a man who acted femmy, whined about first world problems, and overall expected you to treat him like his mother did as sexy, confident, and your "rock"?

The women who can't keep their legs closed and lie about it to their boyfriends, the women who divorce rape their husbands, the women who report false rape claims etc etc.. ARE DAMAGED WOMEN Do you not agree? DAMAGED as in DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE women who aren't damaged don't act this way.

Most women I've met don't truly give a fuck about the "patriarchy" they might say they don't agree with it or something, but at the end of the day most of them still want a strong, sexy, confident, leader type guy as a boyfriend. Most women who aren't totally career driven want to be house wives too. Most women want to go shopping at target and other "evil corporations" despite any leftist brainwashing.

A lot of us came here because we had bad experiences in the past from being beta. We weren't confident, we lacked success, and we endured extreme failure with women. Know who else went through all of this? Nearly every professional athlete; except they have a different perspective on it. They are THANKFUL FOR THE FAILURE because it taught them HOW TO SUCCEED The failure ignited the fire in their belly; and all I can say is thank god for the red pill for lighting that fire in my belly.

Be thankful for all the women in your past that you endured who taught you what to expect if you don't demonstrate masculine leadership (as in not being a spineless bitch, and not tolerating shitty behavior in partners), being her "rock", lifting and always working toward a nice physique, and ambition with money and/or your passion(s) in life. If you're doing all of this and you're not happy with her, just dump her and find a new girlfriend who respects you. These are very rare traits for men to have these days and chances are, there will be a woman somewhere who wants you more than the last one did.

I've been down voted for having this outlook before on here; which I don't really care about.. But it just goes to show you how there are a lot of negative thinkers around here who still don't seem to get it.

[–]oldmanwho 6 points6 points6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

i consider AWALT a first rule. the first rule of fight club: to protect you from your own self delusions of not being on your own. do not talk about it. do not reveal your hand.

run around, thinking NAWALT, spouting NAWALT, you will find NAWALT. or do you? can you even tell?

women are gifted with masquerades, and quite skilled in sensing which script from which play your dick wants to hear. and you can't tell. so it doesn't matter what your first rule is, follow this rule, and don't talk about it.

[–]dyrone_biggums 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah, and you could say the same about guys too because we play on scripts too. I think what he's trying to say is that AWALT shouldnt be some huge brush you paint women with based on one set of circumstances. Some guys get cheated on and then assume AWALT on cheating because they acted like a beta or picked damaged goods. My parents are the perfect example of a red pill marriage and are incredibly happy. If you AWALT based on cheating/shit women then jump on the anti-marriage bandwagon then you're closing your own mindset due to feelz.

AWALT is women use emotion more than logic, women need to be sexually fulfilled, women need a proper man, women (and anyone really) will stray under the proper circumstances, etc...

[–]__ZEAL__-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Your example of acting like a beta is perfectly acceptable within AWALT, that she will leave your ass if you act like one too often. This is common knowledge here.

I'm not sure you have any idea what you're talking about.

[–]dyrone_biggums -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah, and I've said AWALT with cheating if you act like a bitch but not AWALT to randomly cheating. I think you've completely missed the point...

[–]__ZEAL__0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

You say not to use AWALT on a set of circumstances, yet do exactly that, just as I did in my previous comment. This is exactly how AWALT was formed in the first place. And you didn't actually make any distinction between those two things you listed, until this comment.

[–]dyrone_biggums0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

One is a vast generalization due to the guy misinterpreting why she cheated "AWALT women cheat". The other is a much more accurate generalization based on TRP "AWALT women will cheat on you if you act like a bitch". What I'm saying is people too often do the first example instead of analysing why and coming up with the second.

My first post was just building on the comment I replied to and should be interpreted in that context. If you don't understand this then you need to hit the books and learn basic comprehension. L8r

[–]DrunkenOni1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I like this. I putter around on PPD now and then and one of the things I find myself defending most often is from the people who take AWALT too literally. This is a nice elegant way to put it.

[–]henry-jest2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Most women want to go shopping at target and other "evil corporations" despite any leftist brainwashing.

I agree with 99% of your post, but not with second part of this sentence. There are very evil corporations in USA, and this is no brainwashing, but truth. Don't turn this into politics (left or right), because corporations own both parties. If you don't see it I dont know where are you living...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you that companies like Walmart and Target do evil exploitative things; but I worded the sentence explicitly in that sense to make a point that, regardless of what a lot of folks learn in college and how they align their morals, they're still going to tend to gravitate (that majority of the time) toward what suits their immediate wants and needs: In this case, products that are slightly cheaper because they're made in conditions that American standards don't allow.

I hope you can see what I'm saying. I don't align with right wing politics, and I'm certainly not a far left type; but I believe in being a humanist and treating workers with dignity. Oftentimes though if I'm in a rush or in a pinch with money; I will eat McDonalds, I will buy cheap furniture goods and clothing (usually just socks) from target or walmart. I feel like shit doing it, and don't particularly agree with myself morally but we're all hypocrites in some sense and I guess I should see it as something to work on with myself.

[–]thecoyote231 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I think what he was getting at is that women will talk about consumerism being bad and how they want to be green but then turn around and drop a bunch of money at the store without hesitation.

[–]Kingspot0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you. I realized I was looking at it from a negative perspective this whole time.

Fuck these bitches they are all like that

I was thinking like "half of em will cheat on you and fuck you over eventually no matter what you do" You flipping the coin and saying "wouldnt you do the same" was enlightening.

I am progressing further and further from the anger stage. I recently pointed out to myself all the things I learned from the girl that put me there. Your right. I now am thankful for the failure because she wasn't worth that much and now I know not to make those mistakes from now on.

[–]bluehorseinvincible 57 points58 points59 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah dude, RoK hasn't put out a good article in months.

As for Roosh

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle

[–]DuncanMonroe12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I lost all respect for him when he let Dr. Oz (of all people) punk him.

[–]king_of_red_alphas12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty clear that TRP is evolving from a system of analysis to a dogmatic ideology. Obviously, this happens to just about every movement / religion / ideology and TRP will be no different.

TRP has essentially said all it can say about "sexual strategy" and is now branching into peripheral unrelated issues and claiming they are all evidence of X.

Even though many of us came here to basically "get better with women and become better men", a huge part of TRP has thrown in their pet issues and hitched them to the cause.

As TRP gets more dogmatic you see more and more confirmation bias and less self reflection. People try to end legitimate conversations by screaming AWALT or accusing their opponent of being a BP heretic.

Its also probably fair to say that TRP attracts a lot of angry people (understandably) and those people will often scream the loudest and type the most while people actually applying TRP and working shit out in the real world / fucking girls won't be compelled to whine anonymously on the Internet as much.

All that said, it's up to you to find and use the practical information on TRP that will help you live a better life without getting bogged down in anger-hamstering that will likely just make you seethe bitterness.

[–]48LawsOfFlour 29 points29 points29 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I jump on some of the anti-TRP subs every now and then. It's good to get a look at other perspectives, especially the ones that are just "anti" to whatever you are.

Aside from "TRPER BAD" the subs that offer a different perspective than ours aren't very consistent in their messages. It's just a jumble of sarcasm, "witty" comments, and shitposts. TRP has its bad moments echo-chamber-wise but on the whole the community is actually very consistent, self-policing and thoughtful. The message doesn't change from month to month, or from minute to minute.

[–]clint_bronson18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

I used to do that, and while i find myself thinking there are alot of misguided people here (myself included), when was the last (or first) time you've ever heard "TRP has destroyed my life, help!" or "Being Blue Pill was the best thing that ever happened to me".

While those subs offer a counter ""argument"" they never offer a solution. TRP offers a solution (which provides results) whether you agree with it or not.

[–]TheAureate8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That right there; actionable advice. That's what makes a thought valuable.

[–]disposable_pants0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

when was the last (or first) time you've ever heard "TRP has destroyed my life, help!" or "Being Blue Pill was the best thing that ever happened to me".

There are subs like exredpill and punchingmorpheus, so there definitely are people who found TRP and became disillusioned with it. It's notable, though, that the combined subscribers on both of those subs is <4K compared to the >120K who subscribe here. If we throw in some reasonable assumptions:

  • Let's say 20K TRP subscribers only signed up because they wanted to downvote stuff, troll, or get their daily dose of outrage.
  • Let's say another 20K subscribers are so new to TRP that they couldn't yet be disillusioned.
  • Maybe there are other ex-TRP subreddits -- let's say this doubles the total amount of ex-TRP subscribers to a total of 8K.

This gets us (conservatively) to 80K "true" current TRP subscribers and 8K people who have left TRP -- 88K total current and former members. Maybe 9% of people who find TRP leave it and are dissatisfied.

[–]clint_bronson2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And from those 4k i'd wager that most don't even know what trp is or ever applied it to their lives but yet sign up just to trash it.

[–]DuncanMonroe4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I've noticed the way feminists especially argue is not arguing at all. They aren't putting out logic and reason, they're pumping out emotions, feelings, and reactions.

The way they post is so strange, it reads like an angsty teen. What they'll do, is quote small blocks of text (often out of context), give a little commentary, and then move on to another quote. I never see refutations of points and on the rare occasion that I see facts and figures, they're literally made up, sourced from Jezebel and nowhere else, etc. The comments and responses are usually sarcastic or angry. They dodge addressing the issue using more mental gymnastics and emotional tricks than I even knew existed. I came to realize that when they write something like this, they have a different goal than we do. We are trying to get to the truth, or at least prove that our point of view is supported by facts. We're at least trying to convince the reader. They are often not even writing for the reader, but instead for themselves, as a way of venting all their anger, feelings, emotion. And when they are writing "for" the reader, the goal is not to convince the reader that the opposing argument is incorrect because it is not supported by facts, but to simply make the reader angry at the opposing viewpoint.

It's like a different dimension where facts don't matter and are only to be manipulated and obfuscated, because if enough people decide that feelings are more important than facts, then they will be, because that's how society will operate. It's already happening, actually; in science and academia, there are questions that it's simply not permitted to ask, because the establishment fears that the results might be "non-pc" and go against the current political climate. I firmly believe that if scientists uncovered evidence that, say, black people or women were dumber than white people or men on a biological level, or that women, that the new knowledge would either be buried and ignored or tampered with, or at best they would do a little dance to explain why you shouldn't draw any conclusions and there are still so many factors we don't understand.

Unfortunately, it could never even get to that point, because the study wouldn't happen in the first place because "it's racist/sexist". I don't believe for a minute that black people are less intelligent on a biological level, mind you, but if they WERE, I think we have a duty to science and knowledge and reason to accept the things we learn and not pick and choose based on who might get their feelz hurt or who might be offended.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They dodge addressing the issue using more mental gymnastics and emotional tricks than I even knew existed. I came to realize that when they write something like this, they have a different goal than we do. We are trying to get to the truth, or at least prove that our point of view is supported by facts.

Yes. Unsurprisingly girls on reddit behave like girls in an argument - pushing an agenda due to feelz, absolutely no debate or recognition of facts (which are basically an inconvenience to be got around), changing the subject rapidly, expecting to be treated like equals while spouting irrelevencies.

How anyone could believe that girls argue like vicious psychopathic nazis in relationships with their loved ones but are really beautiful snowflakes who post logical and well reasoned arguments on reddit and in their psych class is beyond me.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The way they post is so strange, it reads like an angsty teen. What they'll do, is quote small blocks of text (often out of context), give a little commentary, and then move on to another quote.

It's the modern culture of looking for things to be offended about, puff up, rant and then, as soon as the feeling wears of, go and search for the next thing.

Then again it is not that modern, and having a look at this sub or at MRA subs, it's not even exclusive to femicunts, SJWs and whiteknights.

It's basically the same thing that elderly people do, when they lean out of their window on a pillow, observing their neighbours and commenting about them to their SO.

It's the result of living a life which is so boring that you need to care about other people's life in order to feel fullfilled, or to even feel something. They care more about telling other people how to live their lifes and what to think than they do about their own lifes and to reflect on their own opinions and their moral narcissism.

We often get accused to be empty inside, but to me it is pretty obvious that in fact these people are the ones who are. I couldn't give less fucks about what style of life they lead, since I am much too much occupied with getting my own shit together.

They on the other hand are so empty, that they need to search for things to be offended about, or to feel sad by proxy, like the newest sob-story from around the world, just to feel anything, since their lifes do not offer those things to them.

I pity them to be honest.

[–]chewy_dragee 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This post is awesome, but unfortunately you are not going to sway the ones already caught in that mindset.

You can even see them in the post replies already.

[–]__ZEAL__1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It comes with the territory of using a useful lens that gets results, where other ideas do not. It's going to have those that defend it, due to how well it works.

Just as with everything else, if it doesn't work, discard it. If it works, add it to your life.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I totally agree!

Wait a minute...

[–]Suravira 47 points48 points49 points 11 years ago (50 children) | Copy Link

RoK and Roosh are dead, tbh I never gave them much attention anyways, but he's really gotten out of hand.

[–]DreamBoatGuy2511 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Never really read much of either, out of curiosity why are they dead?

[–]PedroIsWatching42 points43 points44 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Roost has been taking TRP concepts and ideas that we give away for free here and has been pay-walling it with derivative ebooks and subscriptions. That and general asshaty behavior when his flaws are pointed out to him.

ROK is basically the manosphere Jezebel, full of useless rage clickbait and stupid "6 reasons why..." lists.

[–]ButtFuggit-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like someone didn't take his kratom this morning.

[–]GurneyHalleck8528 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

Legit. So has Heartiste, who is far worse than Roosh. Heartiste uses Red Pill relationship material as a recruiting tool for White Nationalism, and you can tell that the sort of people who leave comments on his blog are substantially keyboard jockying incels.

[–]2insickness19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Heartiste, a.k.a. Roissy in DC, has been pioneering Red Pill thought long before it was ever called Red Pill. 60% of the concepts I read on this subreddit he already said in some way. Don't believe me? His Sixteen Commandments of Poon was posted in 2008.

[–]csehszlovakze3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's much older. No ma'am (a MGTOW blog) has posted that back in 2001: http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2001/01/roissys-sixteen-commandments-of-poon.html

[–]GurneyHalleck853 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree that Roissy in DC was a pioneer of the manoshphere, but Roissy has morphed into Heartiste, and Heartiste is more fundamentally interested in using Manosphere ideas as a recruitment tool for White Nationalism, which by necessity must have an impact on the ideas hey conveys with regards to relationships and women.

[–]MrRexels19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Heartiste just follows red pill mentality to it's logical conclusion. Once you know how get laid, you will want to move onto more meaningful stuff. After all, why do you think feminism, social justice and all that post-modernist crap started existing in the first place?

[–]M3_Drifter6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Heartiste just follows red pill mentality to it's logical conclusion.

Agreed. He provides red pill in it's raw, undiluted form. I don't agree with his politics, but I'm adult enough to ignore the 10% of politicking fluff I don't care for.

I'm sure many a man has gotten his introduction to red pill concepts from The Chateau. At least, it was where I ended up after realising the PUAs only had a slice of the pizza, not the whole thing.

[–]theozoph48 points49 points50 points 11 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

If opposition to multiculturalism and massive immigration is White Nationalism, then count me in.

And why would white countries not be patriotic and nationalists, btw? Is anyone here complaining about Japan protecting itself from massive immigration, or China, or India?

Is preserving one's culture only bad when whites do it? Wtf is going on here?

The fact is, there's more than one Red Pill, and the easiest one to digest is sexual differences. But opening your eyes doesn't stop here.

[–]cariboo_j13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The problem with White Nationalism imo is that people are bonding over the color of their skin and not a set of ideas.

I'm mixed race and am opposed to all the PC multicultural shit. Especially the European supplicating to Islamic fundamentalists. If I can't be part of a community because I don't have enough European DNA, that's retarded.

[–]theozoph0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"White Nationalism" is a leftist slur on patriotic sentiment, nothing more. France (my country) has never been defined by the race of its people, but by its language, traditions and culture. The USA has been a nation of immigrants from the beginning. Most western nations have known various waves of human migrations and integration, with little upheaval.

The problem isn't the color of your skin, but your attachment (or lack of) to your culture, and your awareness of the danger massive immigration represents for it. Nobody cares when 10,000 immigrants arrive in a Nation of millions, but when it's 200,000-1,000,000/year, that is a problem. And it is as much (or even more of) a problem to native minorities as it is to the "white" majority, because they're the ones competing with you for jobs, housing and social services, and pushing wages down (the real reason immigration is so beloved of our elites).

Add to this the social friction from widely divergent social mores (from which the same elites and well-off majority are insulated), and you have a perfect recipe for social unrest and racial tensions. Which, from the mercantile upper-class point of view, is much more preferable to social revendications.

The "White Supremacist" narrative is a distraction concocted by people who desire nothing more than to see poor people and immigrants fight for the scraps falling from their table, and accusing each other of their ills, while ignoring the overlords feasting off their toil.

That will be your Red Pill for today.

[–]maladyman -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Race is just another signal for a possible aggregate of genes and culture (aiming for trust, honesty and a litany of "western" characteristics). Eventually you will see further signaling into the elite (aristocrats) vs the mass (serfs).

[–]mryddlin22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link

I call myself a culturalist, I'm proud of my cultural and I think it's better than the majority on the planet.

I'm not ashamed of our past, both the good and bad is what made us. Our ancestors put in a lot of hard work so other cultures can benefit from it.

I'm Canadian and I don't agree with multiculturalism as it has turned out, the PC mentality of the 90's wrapped it into catering to minorites instead of folding it into our own and making it better.

Somehow it become that these foreign cultures get to be critical of mine but I can't say anything critical about the negative aspects of theirs without being labeled a racist.

Western culture in general kicks ass and takes names, anyone that thinks their culture is better, while its on the bottom of the heap, is just butthurt and taking advantage of our culture.

White nationalism is just labeling it with a negative connection, you could just say culturalism.

We need to remind people that it is only our cultural that lets people do this, who the fuck else would let them dominate their political and social conventions.

None but the west, what makes us great is also a weakness. Our ability to work with a wide range of different personalities and get the fucking job done, leaves us open to the fuckery going on now.

My own perspective I see it tappering off, people are getting fed up and tried of all the whining.

[–]joleyline16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Western culture in general kicks ass and takes names, anyone that thinks their culture is better, while its on the bottom of the heap, is just butthurt and taking advantage of our culture.

The west is riding on pure momentum at this point. First/second-gen immigrants are doing the real work, and they're feeling increasingly alienated by 'western culture'.

FFS the entire point of TRP is how Western culture is entering degeneracy. There is nothing people like you can do to stop it. TRP teaches you how to look after yourself after having been betrayed by society, and yet you still romanticize that same society.

[–]mryddlin7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't disagree with that statement on immigrants and I was speaking to the historical narrative, ie the west does kick ass and is the most successful culture to date, you should be proud to be part of that.

I don't agree with the room and gloom narratives either, the data does not point to the end of our culture, we will come through this and it will make us stronger.

What do you think the cultural output of things like TRP are going to be 20 years from now? It's not going to be the pansy ass SJW clusterfuckery we live in now.

Even with all these handy caps we are still on top. China isn't going to go the distance anymore that the Japan owning the world shit if the 90's, or the oil crisis of the 70's, of the Soviets in the 50's and 60's etc etc.

Don't believe the hype on either side, TRP is about bettering Oneself and guess what happens when you aggregate many people doing the same thing, at the same time.

It changes shit, so don't pretend to be a seer and know the future. It's still wide fucking open and we have a damn good shot at winning.

You can give up, I haven't and won't.

Edit: I didn't clarify my position and why I have it. We have an adaptable culture, more so than any other on history.

It's represented by our technologies, both physical and mental. We are still bringing in more and more people to our way of thinking, and that is because its successful.

TRP and other frameworks are quite literally culture pills, medicine for the ills that have grown with in it. Push back or what ever you want to call it but its a direct reaction to the dangers in our society.

The output from this is going to change the dynamic, ideologies always run out of steam. They are moral ponzi schemes and can only pay out by recruiting new members.

The things we are most concerned about, the actions you label a betrayal is to me, just letting the children run the candy shop.

The process of taking it back has started awhile ago and will bare fruit in the future. It's not going to be what either of us expect but I don't think we are going to end up on the bottom of the heap.

It's technology at the heart of it all and how we live, produce and interact is all centered around that.

[–]joleyline5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

China isn't going to go the distance anymore

Looks like you need to take The Red Pill.

There's a lot of wishful thinking regarding China collapsing in the next few years, but if you dig a little deeper and actually start reading reputable geopolitical papers and looking at the actions of those with actual money at stake, the China=Japan narrative is super flimsy. The earliest time at which China might start having truly serious problems is ~2030, but everyone knows that China is going pass the US in nominal GDP around the end of this decade. Japan never even got close.

It changes shit, so don't pretend to be a seer and know the future. It's still wide fucking open and we have a damn good shot at winning. You can give up, I haven't and won't.

I didn't give up, I was never a member of the West. Blacks and hispanics are going to far outnumber the anglos/jews/mormons in a couple of years. The West has no chance.

[–]theozoph3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

That anti-culture you're talking about is progressivism, and its constant destruction of our values and traditions. Is there any other culture that so routinely spits on its own past, its traditions, its religion, its heroes, its classical authors, its own customs and morals as routinely as we've been doing since that cultural virus started destroying us?

Apart from Cultural Revolution's China (but where did its Marxist roots originate, really?), I fail to see a single culture that has committed self-destruction with as much gusto as we've been doing in the last century.

How far exactly are we going to push this before opening our eyes? Western culture is degenerating because it is no longer valued. And it is no longer valued because charlatans and shysters have convinced us their new religion of Progress would take us to the Promised Land, and out of the (largely invented) Darkness of our past.

They have failed spectacularly. Time to reevaluate both our past, and where we're headed, with clear eyes.

[–]joleyline2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Western culture is degenerating because it is no longer valued.

The bigger problem is that it's no longer understood.

(largely invented) Darkness of our past.

This kind of hubris is why I'm not sad to see Western culture die a slow and painful death. I didn't cry for the Native Americans, and I'm not going to cry for Western millennials.

[–]theozoph4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This kind of hubris is why I'm not sad to see Western culture die a slow and painful death.

Most of the crimes of Western culture are the crimes of Progressivism. Industrial exploitation? Progressives. Colonialism ? Progressives. Racism? Yeah, progressives again (not even kidding, scientific racism was invented by liberals).

The traditional world was patriarchal, martial, hierarchical, and religious. Not materialistic, mercantile, exploitative and transgressive. Whatever crimes you think Western civilization committed, I can assure you most of them you can lay at the feet of the liberal "heroes". It would be like blaming Chinese civilization for the crimes of Mao Tse-Tung.

[–]DuncanMonroe1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You say "martial and religious" almost as though they're good things.

[–]theozoph0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Compared to "mercantile" and "materialistic", they're not so bad.

"Martial" doesn't mean militaristic, it means the people making the decision have a direct experience of conflict and its horrors. That they have the backbone to make personal sacrifices for their goals, and think twice before engaging in warfare. Compare that to hawkish Hillary Rodham Clinton, and tell me we're better off now.

And "religious" really means guided by spiritual principles before materialistic ones. When utilitarianism is the standard used to judge everything, humans soon start looking like tools, means to an end. That is the pitfall into which all "progressivist" ideals have tumbled, and which gave us most of the horrors of the modern age.

In earlier times, weapons were banned for being inhumane (firethrowers for example, and even crossbows for a time), and warring European armies often left their wounded for the enemy to tend, knowing they would be well-cared for. It took progressive ideals to unleash genocide, death camps, bacteriological warfare, and the systematic targeting of civilian populations.

Those are the fruits of progressive "rationalism", too.

[–]DuncanMonroe4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll just say fuck tradition and especially fuck religion. Most consistent source of damage, evil, hatred, ignorance, and impediment to progress and learning that the world has ever known. Atheism is it's own red pill that people need to swallow, with religion standing in opposition, as feminism does to TRP, trying (out of sheer ignorance and genuine belief/delusion, not malice) to hold us back

[–]theozoph0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Most consistent source of damage, evil, hatred, ignorance, and impediment to progress and learning that the world has ever known.

Spoken like a true brainwashed good progressivist. Believe it or not, the part I've bolded is the only true reason tradition is so decried in the West.

"Progress" is our new God, and it must destroy the old world to impose its New Order on the world. It's also destroying the Living World itself, but who cares as long as we "progress" to ever-greater degeneracy and hubris, heh?

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]confuseacatlmtd -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Uh if it's between Hillary and those particular Republicans I'll take Hillary.

[–]DuncanMonroe8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

For sure. I'm still clinging to the naïve hope that Bernie can make something happen, though.

[–]J_Dizzle10000 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At this point in time, I had a thought the other day that scared me.

I love the good ol' U S of A so damn much that I'd probably be arrested an executed for flying my American flag long after the US is gone. Although this probably won't happen since they will have to pry my gun and flag from my cold dead hands.

That thought popped in my head while I was at the gym listening to The Way of Men again. As much as I continue to sacrifice for this country and lose my friends so dumb ass politicaians can pretend to give a shit, I believe that this land is too damn beautiful to give up on.

[–]WingTune012 points13 points14 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

/TRP is redpilling on gender, sexual strategy, and so on. There are other places that redpill you on history, race, liberal-brainwashing, etc.

Edit: For those downvoting me in this sub, quit acting like a whiny sjw/feminist, and do some actual research.

[–]GurneyHalleck858 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If you read Heartiste's blog it's obvious that he is using Red Pill material about relationships/sex/women as a base for other ideas which people might not give as much of a shit about --after all, they could always go to Stormfront, and Heartiste's posts about blacks/immigration etc are not so different from Stormfront material. Heartiste is not confident that his White Nationalist sympathesies can stand by themselves as a blog, so he has to piggy-back that material on Red Pill ideas. This is bs.

[–]theozoph1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's his own fucking blog, he can talk about whatever he wants. If you don't like some subjects, you can stop being a huge faggot and read something else.

And if White Nationalism irks you so much, you have the option of going to live in a more colored country, how about that? I hear South Africa is lovely this time of the year, and recently freed from that terrible white oppression you seem to dislike so much. Go, and enjoy the diversity, what's stopping you?

My prediction is that, unless you're a minority yourself (but given the nerdiness of your handle, I doubt it), you probably live in a segregated community, far from any "diversity" not making 6 figures, like all the liberal idiots on reddit.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points3 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FelixCopy 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We aren't "trying to do" anything. Your bullshit about caring about our image is more damaging to the community than any image the community will ever have.

[–]theozoph0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, noes, our precious reputation!!!

We're not trying to do anything, faggot. We're simply presenting hushed information. If you don't have the stomach to act on it, it's your fucking problem.

This isn't r./MensRights.

[–]GurneyHalleck85-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There's plenty of White Nationalist horse-shit I don't read. Heartiste knows it's horse-shit, which is why he has to piggy-back that shit on Red Pill topics. He gives false hope to the Dylan Roof types who comment on his blog that they can merely will themselves to getting pussy and bans people for talking about the importance of looks. That, to me, is evidence he's now primarily interested in using manosphere ideas as a recruiting tool for a different agenda.

[–]VirgoRooster1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

My problem with Heartiste isn't the the controversy surrounding his ideas so much as the fact that his arguments for them often make no sense. He posted pictures showcasing the average female face in a series of nations that he got from some study and said, "clearly the anglo-germanic white women are best looking!" Honestly, from that one study, the greek or iranian amalgam looked the best to me.

Still in the comments section, dumbasses were "confirming" they felt the same way, and that somehow this evidence proves that white people are objectively better.

Honestly, anything that isn't rooted in logic is garbage meant to confuse, and a lot of Heartiste's stuff if loaded with it. If you believe whites are smarter than, say, blacks based on IQ scores, then what do you do when the same study tells you Asians are smarter than whites? In his cases, he just throws it out and doesn't mention it.

[–]theozoph-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

He gives false hope to the Dylan Roof types who comment on his blog

"Dylan Roof types"... now I know I'm talking to a leftist. One day we'll have to start systematically referring to liberals as "Pol Pot types".

that they can merely will themselves to getting pussy and bans people for talking about the importance of looks.

Another defeatist depressive-type, I see. No wonder you're a liberal.

he's now primarily interested in using manosphere ideas as a recruiting tool for a different agenda.

Or perhaps, when you develop a backbone and start speaking truth, you stop caring who you offend.

[–]disposable_pants0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Is anyone here complaining about Japan protecting itself from massive immigration, or China, or India?

People call out Japan for being racist as hell all the time -- you don't have to look far to find the same things being said about China, India, and a host of other countries, too.

Is preserving one's culture only bad when whites do it?

There are annual celebrations of German and Irish culture nationwide in every U.S. city. It's fine to preserve white culture; what people object to is demonizing other cultures.

[–]theozoph0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

you don't have to look far to find the same things being said about China, India, and a host of other countries, too.

By themselves? No, only "western" culture is so masochistic.

what people object to is demonizing other cultures.

Which is exactly what is done daily to European/Western cultures.

[–]disposable_pants1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Who cares if they fail to self-critique? Who cares if they demonize outsiders? I don't want to play down to that level.

[–]theozoph-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Feel free to disappear in a cloud of self-flagellation, then, overwhelmed by more confident cultures.

Funny how no matter how often we teach the principles of confidence and frame here, people still can't make the leap to the greater problem of cultural self-abasement.

When your cultural identity is weak, your personal identity suffers too.

There is a reason the West suffers such a rash of betaness, feminization and faggotry : we've lost all confidence in ourselves, as a society.

The whole West is now a supplicating Beta, inviting the Immigrant Alpha Cock to fuck his women (and even his children) like a good cuckold, while congratulating himself for being so "Enlightened". It's fucking nauseating.

[–]Redpillc0re0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

sorry guys, you may disagree with them, but if you came here to shit on roosh and CH you re deluding yourselves. Despite their occasional faults they are fundamental part of the manosphere and they helped to awaken the minds of what is not called TRP. If you can't provide a more solid alternative or contribution to the manosphere yourselves , then you 're just being assholes.

[–]DuncanMonroe3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The accomplishments of yesterday don't forgive the sins of today. They've gone rouge and are hurting more than helping by making our ideology guilty by association.

[–]GurneyHalleck851 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, Roissy/Heartiste contributed mightily once to the manosphere. He doesn't do that anymore. He oscillates between outrage and silly PUA advice, but his heart is more in White Nationalism. That his heart is more on race topics necessarily impacts his Red Pill messaging, because if his readers are substantially Stormfront types, then he has to change the tune of what he has to say. It's not very "red pill" when you ban people for disagreeing with you (yes, it's his blog, but he has banned me for taking issue with his PUA stances, which I found cowardly.)

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP26 points27 points28 points 11 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Most of the criticism levelled at TRP has no logical basis or follows any causal links based in principle or fact. It starts from the idea of women being equals and then goes from there. This is poor debating because you base your arguments on an assumption... one in this case which can be challenged. Women are typically physically weaker, typically less intelligent and typically far less emotionally stable. - I fail to see how this is equal.

The second problem tends to come from those who criticise TRP being incapable of understanding nuance or the subtlety of similar yet mutually exclusive points. i.e. they can't reconcile the ideas that believing women are inferior, and also believing they deserve similar basic rights to men such as not being tortured, not being violently assaulted, not being robbed, not being defrauded etc etc (just list laws that apply for the protection of both men and women here.)

That's a fairly broad basis to dismiss a large proportion of the nonsense which disparages TRP. Due to this, there is a fairly large proportion of the basic material on TRP which you should question and evaluate more privately because we've already done that. (It is also why you're told to read the sidebar first before contributing.) If that was not the case, we would be constantly inundated with topics that questioned the basis of TRP (poorly) and it would flood/waste the space of the frontpage.

I've posted on how Debating and Discussion as a man will promote intellectual growth. There may be mere echo chamber guys here... but there's also some independent thinkers. It's down to you to decide who is who.

[–]lost_2_apathy 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well said. This is what I was getting at.

"4."Understanding the strengths of opposing viewpoints and appreciating them is essential," ...especially if you want to completely undermine the opponent's viewpoints"

[+]Skuncan_Diles-7 points-6 points-5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're contradicting your original post. Critical thinking means questioning all viewpoints, including your own.

[–]lost_2_apathy 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Questioning myself sounds exhaustively circular.

However, if you are talking about reassessing or a systematic evaluation of one's actions, I agree.

Like I quoted above. It's so important to have an open mind. You don't need to accept what is being said, but understand it so you can have a stronger foundation for what you believe in.

[–]strps1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Finding a consistent and rational underpinning to respond to questions that concern ones own self and society is different than questioning ones self. You must remember that this is reddit and the circle jerk is real. Reassessment is valuable, intellectual paralysis is not.

[–]Gnometard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you don't question yourself, you're going to have a bad time. Always be questioning. The world is ever changing and if your views are not challenged regularly, you're going to be far behind the rest of us in no time.

[–]todoesgracia 8 points8 points8 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

do to have a specific citation(s) for your claims on the superiority of male intelligence or emotional stability? I'm not disagreeing with you but I'd like to see what sort of evidence convinced you of this.

[–]Subtletorious8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

The argument is that at both extremes of the bell curve (+-3d) men out number women. Google.

Lazy writers then dumb this down to say "Men are smarter than women".

[–]xriczz4 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No, this has been debunked. Men ARE more intelligent than women.

Turd Flinging Monkey - Men are Smarter than Women, Deal with it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY

It's funny to see all the posters here who are so proud of having taken "THE" red pill about sexual differences, yet are also so proud of their Blue Pill ignorance on other biologically determined issues, such as race, and who fail to question the equalist paradigm as a whole.

Sexes are not equal, and nor are races or cultures. Deal with it.

[–]Subtletorious0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

That was a very interesting video.

I can only fault the poor wording of "Men are smarter than women". That sort of reductionism implies that the dumbest man is smarter than the smartest women. We need a better phrase so the average man doesn't think he is somehow smarter than 99% of women.

We must also remember we are talking about populations and not individuals. Because the differences are relatively small, it is not possible to reach a conclusion about an individual based upon their race, sex, etc. However, it is possible to see trends in populations when the variation of individuals accumulates.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you seriously need a citation to prove men are more emotionally stable?

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I do not have specific scientific papers to prove this. I am of the opinion that much of academia is subject to political correctness because while some of these great men are vastly intelligent, they tend to lack social intelligence and are therefore very beta in their dealings with women.

Much of TRP is based upon shared observances and anecdotal evidence. While that is worthless to a scientist... I am not a scientist. A philosopher will accept anecdotal evidence because it will satisfy the basics of inductive reasoning. I look to the fields of scientific advancement and see them dominated by men. I look at invention and see that it is still dominated by men. I look back at great philosophers over the years... men. I am also yet to find a woman who is more intelligent than me. Some could be considered equally intelligent but they're very rare.

So from the more typical standpoint, yes women are less intelligent than men.

To be honest I don't even have a thought process to justify why women are less emotionally stable than men... it's just one of those things I've kinda known my whole life. I think TRP is quite happy to accept that one without going to minute detail because all of us have seen it throughout our lives. Though if I had to make an argument, I think I could just say "time of the month" and then sit down while wise heads nodded all around me lol.

[–]todoesgracia1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

fair. i thought it was a good exercise to ask for proof of those statements given the topic of this post. I myself haven't noticed the difference between men and women in terms of intelligence within my graduate studies (and maybe you're just smarter than me - ha), but I understand your reasoning and accept it

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points0 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]todoesgracia 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

don't you think it's a bit hypocritical to judge women for being overly emotional and then simply tell men to trust their gut? what else is "gut" but an emotional source of knowledge (I don't ask this as a rhetorical question)? our superiority as men, if it exists, certainly involves us being able to step away from emotion and judge according to more factual information.

[–]__ZEAL__0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Trusting your gut, and being overly emotional, are two very different things. I'm not even sure how you're relating a gut instinct of say, slowing down because you have a feeling that a cop is near, to emotions running amok all the time. They are not anywhere close to being the same thing. So no, it is not hypocritical.

[–]Derbi50 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I also think there is a certain element that take amorality and turn it into reveling in traditionally immoral practices. Its like the difference between, "I was hungry so I took this candy from that baby and ate it" and, "Haha look at me, I took that babies candy, isn't that badass!"

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TRP tries to address these issues... but ultimately when you encourage men to become leaders... not everyone is going to become Marcus Aurelius. You're going to get some Ghengis Khans and Attillas appearing too. Like everything in life, it's not a 100% positive outcome. When we talk about defending freedom of speech, you end up defending the people with all the worst things to say. Even with the shit, it's better than the alternative.

There are attempts to mitigate potential damage from amorality and the faulty logic that just because sexual strategy (a biological reality) is amoral, then your decisions (a human construct applied to reality) can be amoral too. /u/illimitableman has an excellent post on The Red Pill, You & Morality which I think should probably be spread more often.

[–]__ZEAL__0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Understanding where morals actually come from is pretty key.

Moral and ethical values come from one simple question, posed by the lizard brain: "Is this productive to the human species surviving?". If it's not productive, it's usually on the immoral side. If it is productive, it's ethically sound. The thing is, often the ethical side will require you to sacrifice for the greater good. I'm not so interested in that nowadays, sacrifice now tends to only happen when it directly benefits myself in some way(where it used to happen for nothing in return often).

While I understand what you're saying that people are doing(as it's happening more often here), anyone who isn't retarded can tell the difference between the two.

[–]Temuzjin 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Most of the criticism levelled at TRP has no logical basis or follows any causal links based in principle or fact.

TRP is valuable and my life has improved since I've started reading this sub.

That being said, TRP methods can easily be used for selfish ends, e.g. intentionally seducing a married woman. Yet there doesn't seem to be a strong consensus about morality on TRP. (For example, "should you sleep with married women?" seems to generate heated discussions.) It seems like some TRPers embrace being a dick (sometimes justifying it with "being selfish ultimately makes everyone better off"), some TRPers choose not to be dicks and some TRPers sidestep the question entirely by questioning whether the concept of "morality" even applies or has inherent meaning.

This lack of consensus about morality has a few problems:

  • Logically speaking, either being selfish or not being selfish is the better advice for most people. So why don't we find out which of the two it is and then recommend that?

  • A statement like "there's a TRP consensus that all newbies should lift" is both encouraging and practically helpful. A statement "choose yourself whether you want to be selfish" isn't. Imagine if we told newbies "hey, some of us think you should lift, other people think you shouldn't. So do whatever."

  • Many new TRP members are confused and hurt people. Giving them powerful and potentially harmful tools and then saying "you choose how to use these tools" seems a bit irresponsible. Shouldn't TRP veterans with experience and a clear head tell newbies "it's ultimately your choice, but you're not thinking straight right now, so don't be immoral because you'll likely regret it" or "it's ultimately your choice, but you're not thinking straight right now and being completely amoral is the fastest way to swallow the red pill"?

[–]truchisoft2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A statement like "there's a TRP consensus that all newbies should lift" is both encouraging and practically helpful. A statement "choose yourself whether you want to be selfish" isn't. Imagine if we told newbies "hey, some of us think you should lift, other people think you shouldn't. So do whatever."

The difference is, being selfish or not makes no difference to your sexual strategy... well, in fact, being selfish will actually give you a bigger pool of women to fuck, but we understand it can bring you a world of trouble, similar to using steroids.

So you lift but is up to you to take enhacement drugs.
And you game but is up to do it to taken girls.

See the difference?

[–]DuncanMonroe0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't mess with married women, but a "relationship" is fair game. I have no respect for anyone else's relationships but my own, anyway. If she ends up fucking me or being persuaded, regardless of what I do, it's on her and maybe the relationship wasn't that strong anyway. After all, there are millions of men out there who would fuck "girl x with a boyfriend" if they had the opportunity.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A statement like "there's a TRP consensus that all newbies should lift" is both encouraging and practically helpful. A statement "choose yourself whether you want to be selfish" isn't. Imagine if we told newbies "hey, some of us think you should lift, other people think you shouldn't. So do whatever."

Ultimately, we are teaching men to be leaders. While they need to follow at first in order to learn... ultimately there must be a point where we release them to make their own choices. We help them raise their SMV, from there it's upto each individual what they do. They must become the leader of their own lives.

I wrote a piece on morality a long time ago which was very negatively received by the majority. Some veterans made comments on it and viewed it positively as a sensible analysis of a complex topic. I eventually deleted it because I wasn't 100% happy with it and was beginning to run my own sort of moral experiments. TRP can provide you with information, but ultimately you need to decide how you're going to use and apply it.

You finished your response with the suggestion that telling someone they're not thinking straight right now would be a good idea. I've been told I'm one of the deeper thinkers on here. I've also been told my attitude and understanding of it is excellent. Then I've also been told I'm deep in the anger phase. A couple of people have read my field reports and called me a psychopath. Which is it? The sub itself can't even make up its own mind as to whether I'm thinking straight or not. Therefore I wouldn't trust them. Listen to the veterans if you like, but ultimately TRP is just a bunch of men who've got together to discuss the realities of the situation without whiny feelings-first twats getting in the way. We compare experiences and swap advice, but we're all in control of ourselves and our own decisions. This is the way it should be if you're leading your own life.

[–]__ZEAL__0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TRP is only teachings of ways to become more than you are.

It is not morality. It should not be morality. And it never will be focused on morality.

It's simply a guide of "if you do this, this thing will happen". What people think about the moral complications of it is just noise and irrelevant. People's morals are their own, the only thing that matters is letting people know what consequences come with each action. It's up to those reading to decide if they are okay with those consequences or not.

We aren't here to police each other on morality. That's for SJW's and betas. Do what falls within your moral compass, but do not be disappointed if you find yourself lacking because of it.

Those with no moral compass who have figured out ways of avoiding the blowback from their choices, are the most successful people in the world.

[–]chewy_dragee 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That link on debating is sweet reading.

[–]DreamBoatGuy252 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A big part of the problem with any debate is that people argue past one another. Take your example of starting with the idea that women are equal. Equality is rarely defined well in these types of debates. Equal in rights? I think most can agree that they should have equal rights? Equal biologically? Obviously not.

As a scientist one of things I find the silliest about almost any of these debates, particular those related to sex and gender, is that they are very rarely being done by hard scientists. It's always some political writer or at most someone with a degree from the humanities department. I can tell you that "critical theory" is considered a joke by academics in behavioral science.

[–][deleted] 11 points11 points11 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]oldmanwho5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

don't take it so personally. try again.

the politics of vote are not personal. posts are not entitled to acceptance, nor rejection. nor is such automatically relevant. to grant them unquestioned relevance is an echo chamber itself, is it not?

if, then. now, which if was it again? maybe your HB8-3-Count thesis needs work. maybe your words need work. maybe it is really an echo chamber. don't know which one if you only have one class of if-data to frame on.

[–]AEther_Flux5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We all have to be careful that we don't snap our necks while sucking our own dicks.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You always need to take a break and try to pretend that the other side of the argument is true. Refusing to entertain an opposing idea just makes you closed-minded.

[–]jx23415 points16 points17 points 11 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link

TRP suffers from all the same drawbacks that any system which claims to be able to explain all human behavior - such as Marxism - does. More specifically, any system which is not falsifiable. In science, any example of a case which contradicts a theory refutes that theory. The theory then becomes rubbish and is discarded. Thats why I dislike the use of theory in this context, with its connotations of comprehensive truth. It doesnt help tgat a lot of people here, when they observe something which doesnt fit their model, play it down and suggest it is to an anomaly, or isn't in the right circumstances or something. Nor does it help that the one thing TRP prizes above all else is logic. (See u/NightwingTRP below. Incidentally, he claims that women are typically less intelligent than men. Assuming you use IQ (and that's by no means a perfect way of defining "intelligence", then the average woman is actually the same as the man, but with more very stupid and very clever men.)

What TRP is, is a series of statements and assumptions about men and about women, and their interaction, which, from observing the world, appear to be more accurate than those which have been posited elsewhere, especially those of mainstream liberal society. When it comes to human behaviour, of course it makes sense to draw on evolutionary psychology to a degree in order to explain why men and women choose the partners they do. But theories like that are just simplified models which even their originators admit are of limited relevance today. To say, "women prefer stronger males because at the time our brains evolved it was stronger males who mated with them" is a gross oversimplification. (The premise could be true but the reasoning false and vice versa). Scientists (and I'm one of them) actually don't understand many things. Take hormones for example. We have some idea of how they work, but we haven't fully understood them. The main reason is determining how multiple non static phemomena interact with each other. That's the key word, interaction. The ways in which hormones interact with each other, or different parts of the brain etc.

I recommend purpillpilldebate. Some interesting discussions there.

My main criticism of TRP, by the way is that it does not apply its cynicism about women to men as well. Most men possess as many of the negative traits they ascribe to women.

[–][deleted] 12 points12 points12 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Suravira 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men should beer men

Truer words have never been spoken, I raise my glass to salute you.

[–]Primemale2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My main criticism of TRP, by the way is that it does not apply its cynicism about women to men as well. Most men possess as many of the negative traits they ascribe to women.

I'm with you on this one, also the fact that we have our own set of inherent traits some of which could be viewed as potentially negative, certainly from the opposite sex. Although to be fair, TRP is fighting back against a system which favours female sexual imperative, because that is the priority it is not touched upon as much.

[–]truchisoft0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

how is that useful for your sexual strategy?

[–]lost_2_apathy 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Also, what you're mentioning is people try to come up with their own theories with a bad EvoPsych foundation. I'd say that's why the discipline has so much criticism. It's actually where Roosh and some people on this sub fail.

While there are some anecdotal observations within the PUA community and links to EP studies. People can't start creating theories without supportive empirical research.

If you're reading this and you use evolutionary reasoning without knowing the research, I recommend you find the related articles (not a link summarizing an article) and educate yourself. Just as important is knowing the misconceptions and critiques of the field.

[–]jx2341 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't agree more. The problem of collecting empirical data appears to be the biggest one.

[–]lost_2_apathy 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great points. Never gave that sub a look, but I might now.

[–]1thiasus0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In science, any example of a case which contradicts a theory refutes that theory. The theory then becomes rubbish and is discarded

Yeeaaah no. A counterexample to a theory creates a theoretical issue for that theory, and a lot of discussion starts trying to understand:

  • whether that counterexample is real (it could be a false result, or something that has been ill-interpreted)

  • whether it's true that the theory breaks because of that counterexample (for example, the theory might have to be understood in a new way)

  • finally, whether the theory can be salvaged by extending or modifying it

It practically never happens that an established theory gets outright binned because of a counterexample. Neither should that happen with TRP.

[–]DrunkenOni1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I like PPD too. It really helps me think critically about my own ideas and helps me solidify them. I don't just brush it off when a BP/PP says something, sometimes it really makes me go "huh" and better refine what I believe.

[–]studiov34-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I feel like this proves that a platitude like AWALT is fatally flawed.

[–]truchisoft1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

seems you didn't understand what AWALT stands for at all... you should read the sidebar

[–]studiov34-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Oh, I understand it. The definition couldn't be simpler.

Maybe you don't understand the definition of the word 'all.'

The theory in this case is that all women are like that.

The post I'm replying to says:

It doesnt help tgat a lot of people here, when they observe something which doesnt fit their model, play it down and suggest it is to an anomaly, or isn't in the right circumstances or something.

In science, any example of a case which contradicts a theory refutes that theory.

What TRP is, is a series of statements and assumptions about men and about women, and their interaction, which, from observing the world, appear to be more accurate than those which have been posited elsewhere, especially those of mainstream liberal society.

All women are like that isn't saying women tend to behave this way, it says every single women behaves that way. And therefore, all it takes is one woman who doesn't, and the theory becomes invalid.

Therefore, AWALT would be better off claiming slightly less than absolute certainty.

But of course, that disrupts the echo chamber, so here we are.

[–]disposable_pants4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you take "all guns are loaded" as a literal statement meaning "every single gun is always loaded"?

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know if you are being genuine, but here is my take on AWALT as it was explained to me via the Sidebar.

The exception to AWALT is a unicorn or a red-pilled woman or the fact that all women are P-AWALT - POTENTIALLY AWALT.

The point is for you to always be improving, because the odds are heavily in the favor of your precious snowflake acting like every other girl in the herd. That is a healthy approach if you look at it that way. Now, an autist will argue linguistic gymnastics and state that since Unicorns might exist that AWALT is actually 99.99998% true and need to be changed to A(almost)AWALT, but seriously, who the fuck cares?

The greatest bulletpoint or TRP is take what you need, leave what you don't.

[–]truchisoft2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You still don't get it, it is a generalization, of course there are exceptions, but almost all of the exceptions you know are exceptions only because the conditions were not met. The probability of any of us meeting a real exception is so rare that the term coined for that is unicorn. You still need a lot to read, you are not getting deep enough in the concepts and are getting confused by that.

The second advantage to AWALT is that it just silences people pedestalizing their girls, desperate men will try to hold onto any hint of hope, so if you want to really unplug you need to really believe AWALT at face value, at least until you mature.

Edit: If you ever read any discussion about AWALT you will see how confused you are, every voice of authority will tell you the same, treat AWALT like you would treat a gun you just found... assume it is loaded.

[–]studiov340 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It doesnt help tgat a lot of people here, when they observe something which doesnt fit their model, play it down and suggest it is to an anomaly, or isn't in the right circumstances or something.

...

You still don't get it, it is a generalization, of course there are exceptions, but almost all of the exceptions you know are exceptions only because the conditions were not met.

Again, from the post I replied to initially, you're literally doing exactly what he says NOT to do. Jesus Christ.

[–]truchisoft0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Have it your way man, as someone else said it:

Take what you need, leave what you don't.

[–]Myrpl0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

From what I get, your issue isn't this certain generalization but all generalizations (which ironically is a generalization in itself).

Here is the problem with a not all X claim: it replaces an argument about rational behavior with an argument about essence.

So, I say: Don't touch jellyfish because they will sting you. You say: not all jellyfish sting.

You are correct, but the issue is what decision I should make. Even if it isn't 100%, if the probability that this jellyfish will sting is high enough, I shouldn't touch it! I'm not gonna risk to suffer multiple stings for that sweet low percentage. If you're a masochist by all means, go ahead. But there's a thing called knowledge gathered from the experience of others, that gives good probabilities that say "don't go around touching jellyfish, idiot".

So it's perfectly rational as a human being concerned about his health to treat all jellyfishes as 100% possible to bite him and avoid them, rather than touching to see when they won't.

Same goes with how I treat everything in my life. If I were walking after midnight in a dark alley and see someone holding something that looks like a knife, I wouldn't bet on the chance that he went to the store 2 blocks away to buy something to cut his steak with, or toothpaste, or maybe it's just his cellphone. I'd rather run like hell.

If you still got doubts, visit changemyview.

[–]studiov340 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here is the problem with a not all X claim: it replaces an argument about rational behavior with an argument about essence.

So, I say: Don't touch jellyfish because they will sting you. You say: not all jellyfish sting.

You are correct, but the issue is what decision I should make. Even if it isn't 100%, if the probability that this jellyfish will sting is high enough, I shouldn't touch it! I'm not gonna risk to suffer multiple stings for that sweet low percentage.

I see it more as this:

Someone goes to the cnidarian discussion subreddit and says "I stepped on a jellyfish last weekend and didn't get stung."

Then someone else replies with "Sorry, either you did get stung and didn't realize it, or it wasn't a jellyfish, because there's a thing in the sidebar that says AJS (All Jellyfish Sting)"

I'm realizing the difference here with the absolutes is that one is a good way to live your life, while the other can be used as a cudgel to stifle discussion.

[–]Vovamas4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RoK was the site that alkost turned me away from manosphere. Last time I checked the comment section, there were fanatics saying shariah law would be good in America.

[–]Pathfinder2413 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

The red pill is most definitely an echo chamber. There are occasionally mod posts about how debate and criticism are banned.

Kinda undermines claims to legitimacy.

[–]studiov343 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's so true, we can't let anyone scrutinize it.

Isn't that the definition of dogma?

[–]disposable_pants1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's great how all the posts about TRP banning people for saying things they don't like are still up. Really proving their point.

[–]MagneticJohnson4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

yea cause we need to have debates about whether it's wrong to sleep with a married woman every other day. that would make this forum great. (in fact, this forum shouldn't be about what works, but about "what's nice".)

[–]Temuzjin -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If I only read TRP, then I'd think that the misandry bubble is the single greatest threat to civilization and peak oil, peak soil, declining EROEI and climate change don't exist.

Yes, out of control feminism is a problem, but it's not the only one.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is important to the people here at this point in time now. I would be reticent to belittle people visiting here because there are serious geo-political problems.

If you aren't interested in improving yourself, why would be serious about improving these world issues?

Oh yeah, I am sure that the people confronting these issues in a serious manner are positing on a subReddit. You are coming off as a condescending fedora, be better than that.

[–]Temuzjin 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

To be clear: I do think TRP is valuable. It's helped me a lot so far. I also agree that feminism is a big problem.

However, suppose I'd post a condescending comment that supports the TRP philosophy, for instance "newbies should shut up and read more" or "liberals/progressives are all dumb" or "women are children and feminists are hypocrites." Then nobody would call me out for being condescending. Even if someone would, then other posters might defend me with "don't thought police us" or "if you're offended then you're a pussy" or "ha, your ideas must be so weak that they can't stand up to discussion."

Apparently, if I post a condescending comment that challenges the TRP philosophy ("yes feminism is a problem but it's not the only problem"), then me being condescending suddenly does matter. What happened to "if you're offended then you're a pussy"?

This right here is the echo chamber in action.

[–]neptronix1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're creating a lot of excess carbon emissions and hot air yourself right now, buddy.

[–]RPmatrix-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

are you trying to be 'funny', becoz it's actually coming across to me as pathetic

Remember this?;

It's my opinion that women and men should be on the same level and work symbiotically according to their natural attributes.

I believe that oldschool thoughts on how genders should operate and modern ones are both incredibly biased in either direction and do not apply well in our current society.

I agree that;

The true way to operate is somewhere in the middle.

But what are YOU offering in the way of achieving that?

When i met my current wife, we met in the middle and do not play into this gender role game. Sexuality is lacking due to the base level biology stuff not happening, but the rest of our world is beautifully symbiotic and neither of us feel exploited or have to play into a game.

Hamster away bro, or are you happy being celibate?

You seen I had an LTR (~2yrs) with a 25yo woman with very severe PCOS and so I have a little knowledge on the subject and she was a fucking animal in bed, ALL the time!

Have you anything useful to say or is your solopsism taking over?

[–]neptronix0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You say my post is not useful, yet i'm failing to comprehend how yours is supposed to be useful. I can sense you thumping your chest while you stalk my post history in the distance though..

Are you interested in giving me some useful advice, or just shitting on someone who is new here? please clarify so i can decide whether to simply ignore you or listen to you.

[–]RPmatrix-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you interested in giving me some useful advice, or just shitting on someone who is new here?

Maybe you should have look at my posting history and decide for yourself? It's not hidden.

I am a 48yo guy with a lot of experience, which is why I'm here, to help, and you will might notice I don't stroke egos or simply spout RP rhetoric, I speak from experience --- which is why I asked you what purpose your comment served as it's self evident it's got nothing to do with the OP's post ergo the 'subject' of this thread.

You imply you've been coming here for 5mths (minimum) so you should be well aware those of us with the experience and knowledge aren't going to to "roll over and agree with you", in fact,more than likely the opposite will occur, and once you have "swallowed The Pill" that doesn't mean you've either digested OR internalized the information you've read here.

AFAIK, This sub began with as an attempt to help understand and then capitalize on the 'sexual strategy' of females rather than be mislead by the current 'feminist propaganda' that seems to have negatively impacted and affected many men in today's world, however it soon became obvious that one of the best ways to increase one's 'success with women' was to improve yourself!

This is the direction I wish to support, and so I wonder what 'value' you could possibly see in making such a post, as I explained.

Plus, IF you have been able to learn enough here to begin applying RP ideas to your relationship/marriage, then you'd be aware of how we don't pull our punches here and if you cant hack the heat, get out of the kitchen!

I can sense you thumping your chest while you stalk my post history in the distance though..

You can 'sense' it eh? "stalking' eh?

FFS dude, talk about 'emotive' crap!

You need to wake up to yourself and accept (or at least consider) you just might be 'believing your own bullshit' aka "hamstering", something you should know IF you've done what most of us have already done and read the sidebar material at TRP

In fact it seems to me you're quite angry (about something) and are attempting to 'project' it onto me. That won't work OR help anyone, esp yourself, and again, you should know by now that TRP is a 'bitter pill' to swallow as "the Truth hurts when you discover you've been living a Lie" ... for ALL of us with feelings, shit it's even hurt me, a clinically diagnosed sociopath with BPD! (in their opinion) but hey, I lost count of how many girls I'd fucked by the time I was 25 and it was over 100 --- and that's the Truth.

So back to your post, what were you trying to accomplish with such a comment?

I'd really like to now, however, as you know, you can choose to avoid dealing with the hard questions but don't be expecting any more assistance from me IF you do that.

TL:DR I wouldn't be here IF I wasn't interested in sharing my experience to HELP OTHER GUYS deal with the problems they have by sharing my knowledge acquired through hard won knowledge from RL experience and application of the same.

Shit, if I were you, I'd be stoked some dude here has had a gf with PCOS (and all the shit that can come with it, including things like her collapsing on me (more than once) and being hospitalized from complications of her disease) and HAS some RL experience in the matter

Why are you here?

Would your 'wife' get pissed off if you fucked other women? Would she go for the jugular if you said you wanted to see other women for sex? Could she 'handle' just being your 'friend' and continuing that 'fantastic, synchronistic and intimate friendship' you have or would she 'divorce rape you?

IF she HAS PCOS odds on she can't have children, so why did you get married? Seriously?

Who's "idea' was it? How could it benefit you?

Or were you (just like all of us were once) conned into believing a load of bullshit by 'others'? Was it your parents, her parents, is she rich and you're a gold digger? I could guess all day long BUT unlike you, I choose not to make assumptions, which is why I'm asking you Now.

What possible benefit is there in marrying a woman at all, let alone one who can't be a mother to your children, or were you trying to ensure You were the Only one with her by making her swear 'until death do us part' in an attempt to mitigate your 'abandonent' issues?

I have NO idea, which is why I asked BUT all you DID was get pissy about it!

How long were you at R/relationships and/or deadbedrooms seeking 'help' before someone (like me) sent you a pm to guide your sorry arse here in the HOPE you'd find some help dealing with your mindfuck?

If you're not prepared to, get Real, and be HONEST with us and open up about yourself and the situation you're in, GIGO applies very much here at TRP and you're your own cleaner and garbageman. No one else is going to do it for you.

TL:DR what was your reason for posting that remark that has NO relevance to the topic of this thread and 'helped' no one? (except maybe yourself as you think you've just made a 'clever' (smartarse IMO) comment that we're all going to agree with, so you can get some 'validation and upvotes' from TRP?

I do not know, which is why I asked, BUT if you can't be bothered to reply to this post, I fully understand what type of guy you aren't, but I don't know what type of guy you ARE!

your turn

Matrix

[–]disposable_pants0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I only read TRP

If I only read Sports Illustrated I think there's nothing in the world but football, baseball, basketball, and occasionally hockey/soccer/cricket/tennis. Almost nothing is meant to be read in a vacuum.

[–]unsafeword 3 points3 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Echo chambers serve a legitimate purpose when learning or refining one's understanding of the complex: Echo chambers eliminate distraction. You often have to learn the whole of something in order to properly evaluate and deflect criticism of its early points. A man trying to rediscover what it means to be a man, but doing so with the constant noise and jeering of dissenting blue pills? He's unlikely to succeed.

But the echo chamber is just a starting point.

A man who believes he's approached mastery, but who is uncomfortable entering venues where it's appropriate to debate and defend what he's learned? He's just wanking.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Intriguing theory. I am not going to up or down vote it, but will revisit it at a later time to reevaluate it.

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points5 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Derbi50 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Do you remember that debate a couple years back, I think it was the first one of the presidential election, where Romney rocked Obama?

What happened there is Obama lived/lives in a bubble where his frame is never challenged. Everyone is his bitch and subordinate to him. With the exception of MAYBE some foreign rulers (Saudi Royals, Israeli power brokers, etc.) he literally had no one who dared speak to him as an equal. As such he had no recent experience with holding frame against an aggressor.

Rush is in the same zone. He has people kissing his ass 24/7. He has people whose full time job it is to make sure no one even gets on the telephone who might shake his frame.

Therefore his frame and physique are so terrible from atrophy. That and women can smell anger/bitterness, which is him in a nut shell.

We have all seen it a hundred times. Dude doesn't get laid, gets mad/bitter. Women sense the mad/bitter, and don't want to fuck the emitter of said vibes.

Drugs Limbaugh I think is exhibit A. in the "money doesn't buy happiness" trial.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I am with you all the way, except the "Mitt rocked Obama first debate". The only thing Mitt ever rocked were a pair of expensive cuff-links.

Those are not debates, they are puppet shows where no one can call bullshit on either side and the moderator might as well be a random computer.

As far as Obama goes, I never trust anyone who has never been in a physical fight. He recently admitted that he has never been in a real fight. If no one wants to kick your ass, then you never stood up for anything to the best of your ability, win or lose.

[–]Derbi50 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is that scene in Fight Club where he says something like, "Most men have never been in a real fight. They will do anything to avoid it." which I thought was bullshit. Asking around though there is a pretty big segment of men who haven't ever been in a knock down drag out.

I try not to fight anymore because when I was bouncing as a kid one of the bouncers at a neighboring bar punched a guy outside his bar, dude fell down hit a sewer grate and died. Manslughter I think he got.

But when I was a kid I used to fight plenty.

With Obama I bet its the fact that he is such a good talker. Some kid starts to talk shit, little Obama probably talks the kid out of his lunch money. Still though you would think inevitably he would have to throw down at some point.

Maybe he is lying, I mean politicians lie.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Great points.

The older you get, the greater the penalties (civil, physical, financial) become.

But if you have never been in fight before 12, 14 or 17 - what happened in your life to never gain that experience? I avoided physical conflict 19/20 times due to de-escalation, humor, negotiations and avoidance whenever I could.

Who has grown up playing sports that didn't have a knock down drag out fight - even with friends?

I think winning and losing a fight are milestones in masculinity. I think they are important and I view any male friend or colleague who says they have never been in one in a different view - not necessarily contempt - but less than respect.

[–]Derbi50 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. Getting your ass beat can also be an excellent teachable moment.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points3 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Derbi50 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know the type. She has this idea in her head that she isn't going to be like those girls who are attracted to high value confident men but instead wants to be attracted to white knights.

This of course leaves her sexually frustrated and hating herself for the fact that she is not satisfied by her beta boyfriend.

[–]idontwanttostart4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Absolutely. TRP seems a bit of a circlejerk. Downvote away. But a lot of this shit isn't about becoming a better man/person.

I'm probably gay. But what the fuck ever.

[–]neptronix-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most of reddit is a circlejerk. Sorry, but it's true.

Human nature showing it's ugly face on a medium that was designed to be the ultimate attainment of freedom of speech, sadly.

[–]Killeurkilleur 4 points4 points4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah . I see a lot of good posts everyday on this sub but from time to time there's a guy that will come up with :"dont you know women are inferior to men and blah blah blah women are the most evil creatures on earth blah blah blah womens brain are less evolved than men..."the worst thing is those posts will get hundreds of upvote. This sub was about bettering yourself, understanding the female mind now its all :"womenz have ruined my life blah blah blah" i think we can do better than that

[–]neptronix1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. I also hold the view that men / women are not better or inferior to each other. They're just different. Biology designed us to work together, and so did culture.

Divisive ideologies such as femenism have really fucked up that symbiotic coexistance.

Creating an ideology that is an inverse of femenism is not a way to correct it. Tearing divisive and nonsensical ideologies apart limb by limb is.

[–]1jimjackjoe1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you give some specific examples of behavior you have seen here that is like what you describe, so I can get a better sense of exactly what you mean? Because I find debate is tolerated here, as long is it is a) not totally stupid and b) not off-topic. What is an example of a debate that should have been had but was blocked and/or hated? You might be saying something more nuanced than what I'm thinking about.

[–]Requi3m-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The mods are constantly making posts saying debate is not tolerated.

[–]truchisoft2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pointless debate is not tolerated, this post is an example of how debate is tolerated.

[–]ramot11 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I read somewhere that if I can't argue for an opposing point of view, it means that I don't understand it well. Understanding an opposing view seems essential to understanding my own view point.

I admit I don't always follow this idea, but I think everybody would be better for doing so. Would you agree?

[–]awayofthought1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great post, probably the best one this week. This is also becoming a serious problem on asktrp, where only one answer is given that doesn't really help anyone.

[–]stillnoturday1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The base of what TRP is, self improvement.

[–]chadchadington1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Some argue the first man to "wake up" was Warren Farrell, in so much as he had extensive experience speaking on behalf of feminism until he noticed patterns and changed his approach and became a pariah for doing so--also an author of his beliefs.

People like Roosh become idolized too much. Too many men weakened by the new insights brought to them by TRP look for a new god. Learn, apply and find your new path. I see too much ass-kissing everything these men say as opposed to discourse. Roosh used to be good. I've notice low-levels of racist commentary and misogyny. Plus he seems to be hell bent on creating a brand and profiting as the expense of TRP ideology. Rollo, on the other hand makes profit from his book sales but his price point is low enough as not to exclude people from acquiring his material. Also, he mentions he's not in it for profit and allows all comments (agreeable and dissent) on his website.

Honestly I never understood banning people or downvoting. I see this behavior the same as the FI's attempts at censorship of ideas they don't like. Like a child. "Don't like what I like? I'm not playing with you anymore!"

[–]BlueFreedom4201 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is always going to be an echo chamber/sycophant party in any place of thought and discussion. The real test is leading yourself.

Been reading these forums for about 6 months and I havent seen anything as bad as the shit you see on feminist/SJW forums.

[–]JeanValjean197o 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's hard to avoid echo chambers. People like to congregate around people who think the same and won't challenge their world view.

To be truly informed you must be willing to visit sites that you don't necessarily agree with and who may frame an argument in a way you aren't comfortable with. That means watching both Fox and CNN and MSNBC to gain a complete perspective and if possible foreign news like Al Jazeera or BBC for yet another (or reading them if you prefer).

That said, it's often impossible to engage in a rational and logical discussion. A recent discussion here on TRP between myself and DannyDemotta started with me citing the Consumer Price Index to show how inflation doesn't rise after a minimum wage increase and how "free labor economies" will stagnate and fail and him responding with "filthy liberal" and fuck this and fuck that.

Responding politely to his rant did no good. I should have simply remembered the prime rule of winning any debate.

Rule #1 of winning a debate. Once you have outlined your argument using facts and logic and your opponent has insulted you, attacked your character, or simply says "Nuh Uh" without citing a single reason why, I need only declare victory for his failure to respond cogently and move on.

In this last case I said some things I definitely meant and would be more than happy to back up in person, but which probably aren't very productive to the discussion.

Oh well.

[–]Ralt 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.

If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension GreaseMonkey to Firefox and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]Requi3m1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah the mods here in TRP love to threaten to ban people for disagreeing with them. No different then the feminazi subreddits.

[–]a_nus2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

There is indeed a lot of circlejerking that goes on in here, just like any other well established sub.

[–]waylandertheslayer0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a great mindset I try to have that is really important: "Not every change is an improvement, but every improvement is a change. You can't become more correct by arguing for something - at most, you make more other people agree. To improve your beliefs, you must change them."

There are probably plenty of places that TRP could be improved. I don't know where they are. But if/when someone finds one, I want to be able to recognise it and change my mind.

[–]Johnny10toes0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A book that a lot of us would do well to read is Prometheus Rising. in it he does a good job of pointing out how people use biases to form an opinion and reject any new information. Everyone has a reality and it would do you some good to try to understand the reality of someone else.

[–]oldmanwho-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

pretty biased about that sun, always rising in the east.

go on, tell me that it doesn't. because you are right, i will reject that reality.

there is only one reality. though everyone is in it, not everyone has it, and certainly not everyone places it first. those everyones that don't put reality first, only incept rising in their heads. their head-reality will not be shared: it can't be.

[–]thrown15200 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

TRP says a woman necessarily rejects a guy who treats her in a friendly manner, because he did treat her in a friendly manner. Nevertheless, TRP is not actually saying that all women hate themselves. TRP says that to a woman, being a friend is qualitatively different than being an intimate partner. TRP assesses feminism as the dominant ideology in western societies like the USA. Feminism has resulted in women having the final power of decision as to whether a relationship will come into being. Women prefer two types of men above all others: alpha and rich, because they are biologically built to prefer that. Since men judge women primarily on looks, the best-looking women are only interested in being with either alpha or rich. This all does not mean that women are the enemy. A lot of the talk on TRP is bravado that is building up a person's ego as they go to try to get their next lay or whatever.

Patriarchy definitely worked better than this shitty hypergamy system. Feminism is a joke that has made exactly zero people happy, men or women. Successful Red-Pillers who talk about having a multiple "plates" etc don't come off happy or content at all.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know if it is because it is summer, or if it is due to the huge influx of newcomers, but the last two months have been a down-vote party for any posts that question the validity of a thread.

This is something that might have to be posted every week for rest of summer, and possibly forever.

Skepticism is healthy. Hearsay is usually just that, hearsay. I can't count the number of, "My friend just got divorced and this happened..." threads that are just complete and utter bullshit.

Don't be a sheep, don't spread rumors and take your gossip and up-vote addiction to another thread, men are talking.

[–]ActuallyARaptor0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always called it the 'Gold Effect'

[–]RidleySmith0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I hear what you're saying.

For a long time I just refused to read anything remotely feminist and now I force myself to read an article I come across if it sounds like some blue pill bullshit. It usually is but after reading it I have the opportunity to challenge my views and see if they have a point, they almost never do, but it's a useful exercise.

[–]1nzgs0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think being a follower of a person rather than a way of life is never a good idea. The problem with RoK is that while there is a lot of good content on there, it's almost like a personality cult for Roosh, and the guy is kinda weird. He embarrassed himself on that tv show also.

[–]leodoestheopposite 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TL;DR: RoK and blogs in general are not places where the host welcomes ideas contrary to their own. If you disagree strart your own blog.

I have been in the blog business for over a decade, and I disagree with you.

Imagine you're in your parents' living room, talking about the upcoming Thanksgiving dinner, logistics, time, who's bringing the apple pie and who's bringing the pumpkin pie; size of the turkey, beverages . . . the works. All in a sudden the door opens wide and a self-professed vegan-health nuts comes is and starts telling you about the benefits of substituting your turkey with TofuTurkey, the dangers of salt and sugar, calories counts, and animal cruelty.

The proper answer would be: "Who invited you?"

RoK is a blog, he has a message and a philosophy that he is promoting, and welcomes a friendly conversation; but it's his living room, therefore his rules. As a guest if you are steering the conversation in a direction that is not welcome by the host, do not be surprised if you are considered "persona non grata".

The same for this sub that is steered by both the moderators and the majority of users. Once I was temporarily banned for 30 days and I accepted such decision gracefully even though I didn't fully agree (the issue was "quality of post").

You do have the right of Freedom os Speech, and you can express so by running your own blog and/or your own sub; reference the posts that you disagree with, and even make fun of them is you're into parody.

But "intruding" into someone else territory pushing your controversial agenda, uninvited, and expected to have the red carpet rolled in front of you when you were not explicitly invited to do so is not polite at best, and arrogant at worst.

Running a blog or a forum takes time, effort and often money; that's the reason behind the 1-9-90 rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture) , it's a lot easier to parachute with an easy comment that it is to lead a conversation.

So you got banned? It's OK. Do you have your own message to spread that you believe takes TRP message to higher levels? Great! Start your own blog and since you are at it, start your own sub too. I for one will be the first one to congratulate you in taking matters into your own hands, and I will follow and read your writings for a while, then decide whether it's for me or no. If asked for feedback I might even give it to you.

By posting in here by default you accept "feedbacK" by way of our comments, you must accept that, and you do whatever you want with it. At the same time if the mods decide that this comment of mine is not worthy and delete it and ban me temporarily, I will accept that too. And downvotes are also something that I am consciously exposing myself to. It's all part of the way this sub works.

[–]razorwan0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see a lot of people here who put down people who do put a moral value on sex. I was raised to be modest in all walks of life, including sex. If I'm to hold women to a standard to being chaste, then I won't be a hypocrite about it. If you want to pursue women and be a manwhore, that's your prerogative, but don't disqualify a guy as being RP if he doesn't pursue pussy like a commodity. I am waiting for marriage, and I'll do my best to make sure I don't wed a slut who's been on the CC.

[–]I_is_the_best0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say that TRP is like scientific method applied to social interactions, SMP and life in general. At its core it's about being a critical thinker.

Your post is like saying so all scientists think that gravity exists - fuck that shit - it's an echo chamber!!

[–]Elim1010 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Care to provide examples of that happening here? Mods banning people for disagreement, perhaps? Or is this just an abstract, borderline-concern trolling post?

[–]hebola4lyfe0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the infiltration in this sub is quite obvious by now ; this thread is a great example .

[–]1favours_of_the_moon0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RoK can be like a "Bonzai Kitten" parody site. I like it though. LOL

[–]Derbi50 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is as big a problem as it was (if not worse than) before the civil war.

Basically people today can go through months without being exposed to an unbiased (relatively) point of view.

You turn on your cable news in the morning, drive to work with your talk radio, and come home and watch your slanted news again, then browse your slanted websites.

There is no more Cronkite or Murrow to give it to you straight.

There used to be a law saying you couldn't lie and call it news. That was repealed in the 80s I think.

If the average American was a critical thinking even minded individual this sort of propaganda self brainwashing stuff wouldn't work, but most Americans have an 8th grade reading level and think dinosaurs and people cohabited the Earth simultaneously.

[–]neptronix0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen return of 'kings' acting more like little princesses and called them out on that behavior more than once. That earned me a ban.

RoK seems more like the male version of radical feminists. They act like it.. they bitch like it.. they blow shit out of proportion.. then they can't take the heat when you point it out. I don't respect them and i think they do a great job making the rest of us who aren't assholes look awful.

Fuck 'em.

[–]Redpillc0re0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have to say , this has become the most disappointing thread i ve read here in a long time. Almost 80% of the comments are about how swjs and feminists are not wrong and nawalt. Well good for you kids, here's to hoping that one day, maybe it might work for you, but don't hold ur breath, swjs are not your friend. I am marking the 120000 users as the limit when the main message of TRP has been watered down so much it's no different than the rest of reddit.

I get it that skepticism should be the default mindset, but people here are too easily swayed to be able to be skeptics.

[–]Angry_Landwhale -4 points-4 points-4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Most of what we do here is heuristics. Red pill is about developing a mindset of strength and embracing a master morality.

What you are talking about is subversive. So much of the lefty/Marxist derivative believers only care for rationalism or logic when it attacks whatever opposes the world view they hold.

Masculinity is spiritual. You're trying to tear it down with technical and semantic arguments. Why are you doing that? An echo chamber is necessary when everything and everyone outside of it does not care for reality.

[–]Skuncan_Diles6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

An echo chamber is necessary when everything and everyone outside of it does not care for reality.

Do you know how fucking crazy this sounds??

[–]Angry_Landwhale -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No and I don't care. Why do you base your opinions on what other people seem acceptable?

[–]_Rd_Walker_1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Considering you're arguing for an echo chamber, it seems reasonable to think that you want to base at least some of your opinions off of what others think.

[–]Angry_Landwhale-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You're not thinking clearly. Seek people with the same belief. That doesn't mean find random people and adopt their beliefs.

[–]Smitty6 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree. Open minded skepticism is the way to live.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter