~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]Canadian-Seductioner 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You're right, but you also fail to realize that just like sales, the product matters. If your product (you) is shit, nobody is going to be interested in it, no matter how good you are at sales or how many potential clients you approach. You may get some out of luck or because they get bamboozled by your sales tactics, but in general, you will fail at closing deals. However, if your product is super attractive, your closing ratio will be much much higher.
[–]CaptainDolin 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So basically, just like OLD, if you're not Chad, it's over.
Only social circle game remains. Which is the most natural and purest of the three though.
[–]Canadian-Seductioner 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not necessarily. OLD is defs more about image, but I'm just saying you gotta look your best to find success. That doesn't mean be a chad, it just means put some effort into your appearance lol. Same with social circle game.
[–]Technical_Hawk8547 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That’s totally valid. If you want to only explore that avenue then more power to you. Cold approach is more about broadening your options. Think for a second if the tables were turned. You had a girl approach you and hit on you. Now this girl was nice, respectful, and warm. Yet she just wasn’t your type. Would you lead this girl on or just tell her you aren’t interested? You also probably wouldn’t be rude or mean to them, if anything it made your day better as someone found you attractive enough to take time out of there day to talk to you.
It’s a round about way of saying that not every girl will like you off approaching them in public and not to take it personally. It just doesn’t hurt to try
[–]PainDevourer 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Also you learn a lot, gain confidence, and just have nice experiences with random girls, even if most of them don’t lead anywhere. Online dating though is even worse for all guys who are not a 8-10 and/or don’t have good writing skills. Social circle game obviously is the best, but the number of people entering your social circle will always be quite limited.
[–]KingKlob 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This exactly. In online dating I don't get any matches at all unless it's a random person on reddit who at least most of the time will talk but then ghosts. But in public at least I get that first impression, I get to use body language, I get to see and gauge her reactions, and I usually get at least a conversation. That all does wonders for my mental health, so that is what I am really looking for and if anything beyond a conversation happens such as a new friendship or more happens then that is badass. I have gotten laid from this and made 2 badass new friends who I never slept with and wouldn't because of the friendship, but it has never helped me get a date yet. Before I actually started going out to cold approach I was lacking confidence and I didn't have the best attitude, now that has changed for me personally.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago* (30 children) | Copy Link
It’s funny because many other people get very good results from cold approach, which shows that someone’s social skills, natural charisma and attractiveness have a tremendous influence on whether cold approaching works or not.
Just because it doesn’t work for you, doesn’t mean it doesn’t work for other people. Your reality about cold approach doesn’t really represent the reality of many others who do cold approach.
There are some who will share your reality and many others won won’t share it
The only reason you are writing this here is because you just wants to hear that your failure with women is not due to your incompetence, when in fact it is.
Much like your failure in sales also has to do with your incompetence because i know people who are in sales who get a sale for every 3 calls on average.
[–]FiftyNereids 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If you want to be truly "scientific about it", get twins to do a study.
The problem is you cannot "pinpoint" exactly whether or not it was social skills, natural charisma, the woman's type, luck, location, culture, a person's physical looks, or the "right" combination of all of those traits that helped with a person's success.
Look, if you can show me a guy who has a success rate above 50%, maybe I'll listen. But people like the idea that if you worked hard enough you'd be able to get any girl, which I think is a good idea. However, they also fail to realize that life is also unfair, and you can only deal with the cards you're dealt with.
The reality is, if someone was extremely ugly, had no status, he would probably do extremely poorly in cold approach. This is actually quite obvious to most people. The issue is people who are extremely successful cannot say they've worked harder than others especially if they were naturally endowed with good looks.
For all we know 70% of a first impression can just be based purely on looks. Give a reason for a woman to actually turn their head walking the streets, it probably will come down to either looks or some kind of status symbol the man is displaying. To even get someone to give you a chance is difficult if you are not good looking because people will not even care to get to know you before walking away.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you show me a guy who can get 50% success rate with women on any type of way he meets women; from social circle, to dating apps, to night clubs, etc maybe il listen.
Sorry, but you seem to think that the majority of people sleep with half the woman they approach in their life, that is not the case for 99% of people so i don’t know why you would expect that from cold approaching.
In dating apps, you need to swipe on hundreds or thousands of women and you are super unlikely to sleep with half of them, but according to you for cold approach to be successful you need 50% success rate?
I think you have very unrealistic expectations. Part of growing up is realising that most girls you try to seduce in your life aren’t gonna be interested in you regardless of how you approach them.
Also most guys who are not attractive just don’t do any effort to be more attractive, whereas most women who look attractive spend a hell of a lot of time trying to better themselves to be more attractive.
The make up, the heels, the fake eye lashes, the clothes, the gym, the diet, the skin care routine, the haircut, the plastic surgery, and so many other things contribute towards being more attractive… Guys like you who complain that they ar ricky and nobody likes them don’t even do 1% of the effort to improve their looks.
If they are fat they whine, instead of getting their ass to the gym and getting fit.
They dress like shit and have no self awareness of how awful their clothes make them look and how much better they would look if they changed style…
they have horrible haircuts because they don’t know what type of haircut actually looks good for their facial shape.
They have a terrible diet which contributes towards acne, fat, wrinkles, etc and then think it’s genes when most of it has to do with their bad diet who screws them up.
And lastly, if you think cold approach is all about looks, wait until you get in dating apps where looks are even far more important. And the question said that dating apps are more effective than cold approaching which isn’t true at all. Dating apps the standards are a hundred times higher than in real life.
So, your looks are something that you can control to a very large extent women have known this for centuries, so while it’s nice to tell yourself that life has screwed you over and you can’t do anything about it as if god hated you when you were born, the reality is you can. But your ego can’t handle that because then it would have to admit that you are incompetent and lazy.
Also nothing you wrote disproves my point. Yo it reality is just your reality, I know objectively ugly guys who get a lot of success with attractive women. The difference is they don’t go around whining about their situation and playing the victim card when interacting with women.
they also aren’t as dull, boring, they tend to be quite fun, charming, extroverted, and can generally own the room, whereas guys who whine like you tend to be super boring, super annoying, etc. And then they complain that women don’t like them because they are ugly because they would rather tell themselves it has to do with ugliness than with how fucking boring and dull they are
[–]m7h2 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i mean this doesnt disprove his point
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Any proofs for that claim of many other people who have good results? No need to show them but what are you basing yourself on when making that statement? YouTube videos?
[–]Mistermistery101 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I have really good results with cold approach. And I also do sales (I run a business)
The idea of comparing sales in business to approaching women is idiotic.
For starters, even sales in business is relative. For every 10 cold email I send, I get 2-3 respond backs and at least 1 sale.
So from my own experience, if I were to compare sales to women, you can say that I can sleep with about 1 out of 10 women that I approach. I don't know about you, but that's good numbers.
That's why it's stupid to compare women with sales in the way that the op is doing right now.
Secondly, as someone mentioned, there are so many factors to attraction. If you're getting shit results, you're doing something wrong. And 9 times out of 10 it's not your looks. It's something else. Whether how you behave, whether or not you're awkward, whether or not you lead, whether or not you're building a man to women connection. All of this plays a role in attraction.
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Also how is it stupid to compare to sales if you just did and the results seem to match
[–]Mistermistery101 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because it's anecdotal and coincideental to my own experience. I actually get better results with women then sales if we're talking pure numbers
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because he runs his own small business vs me working for a larger one doing calls all day.
He does sales but he also does marketing.
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Just courious, is your business coaching/seduction?
[–]Mistermistery101 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, I run a webdesign business as a marketing consultant.
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The average cold call success rate is much lower than 10%: https://www.crmnext.com/resource/learning-center/cold-calling-statistics
I don't doubt that. My whole point is that comparing cold calling to Approaching women are fundamentally different. You're not building sexual attraction with a potential client or lead.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Got various friends who are very good at it, and tend to get good results, they are fun, witty extroverted people, and can easily make the girls as well as the men laugh immediately…
They just have people’s skills and can easily get along with anyone they talk to.
On the other hand i have other friends who are very socially awkward with people, don’t really know what to say at first with new people they meet, and tend to be quite stiff and logical in conversations, obviously they don’t get much success with girls.
So these friends live very different realities, and it can’t be said that he first guys are more good looking than the others, they all look average and similar, nothing about them stands out much, they are also not ugly, they are just normal looking.
[–]Icy_History_4728 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Do you have any references for what you mean "results"? Like how many f closes do they get from amoung how many approaches? Or is it more anecdotal impression.
Interesting point about being fun and witty. I'm actually very good at it, but only when I'm with a wing. Problem is that all the wings I found are the logical and stiff type that you mentioned. So they cringe out very fast and we don't match.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
Enough to feel good about themselves and their results with women and getting laid often, and for others to be impressed about how often they date new women, as for specific numbers normal people don’t go around doing math.
Maybe that’s your problem that you treat this as a science or something that needs to be measured.
This prevents you from truly connecting with women, since you are outcome dependent, and goal oriented. And talking with women is the whole opposite of that, it’s about feelings, emotions, empathy, desire, connection.
Your results will be heavily influenced negatively by your need to compare yourself to others, your expectations, your need to calculate and be robotic in your experiences with women, and how you treat women as numbers, and medals to your efforts.
Or maybe he just doesn’t wanna waste his time spending hours finding and meeting random women in the street?
Men who value their time don’t chase women
Like i said, you just want to prove me wrong no matter what i say.
You are free to waste your time on dating apps as well.
Good luck.
[–]Icy_History_4728 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
While you have a point about the preferred nature of interactions with women, I don't think this has to do with trying to understand whats your baseline for "good results" and in relating to the op statement about it being effective or not.
Feeling good with themselves and bragging amoung bros is too vaguely and isnt good enough reference to decide if it's worth the time. If they approach 3 hours a day and get laid once in a while that's one thing for example, and closing one amoung 10 approaches is a another thing. When one wants to decide if it's worth the time invested, those statistics matter.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Ok, dude believe what you want to believe.
My whole point is that other people find success doing cold approach and others don’t, simple as that.
So to conclude that something cannot work for anybody just because it doesn’t work for you, is absurd.
It’s nothing but a lame attempt at protecting their own ego because they can’t accept the fact that they are not as competent and that other people in their same situation and with similar conditions, just know better in that area than them.
Or maybe he just defines success differently than you do? You seem to be caught up on getting laid or going on dates and want to ignore all semblance of process or the work it took to get there. Believe it or not, it matters.
Maybe he doesn’t consider getting a number or a date after 50 rejections and 5 hours walking around a success. I certainly don’t.
If you need to get form California to New York you can walk, skateboard, drive, take a train or fly. All these will eventually get you there “successfully” if you persevere enough. That doesn’t mean that all of these of the best way to go about it.
Sure he has his definition of success.
So i guess we agree to disagree which further proves my point, about people having different experiences doing something and finding different levels of success.
Some guys succeed at cold approaching and some others don’t and since everyone definition of success is different then everyone can be right in their own opinion.
Which means that cold approaching is a great way for some people, whereas online dating is great for other people.
So do what works for you.
Thank you for proving my point.
[–]Icy_History_4728 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think that to make that point you have to have some statistics (even roughly) to define success. Again, doing CA 3 hours a day with some success here and there isn't success or motivating enough (for me). It's all about the retourn on time investment that you get. And his point is that online dating has more ROI then CA. To debunk his experience accompanied with clear numbers, you will need more then something anecdotique. All of these doesn't mean your point isn't valid. It actually makes a lot of sense. Just making a point further about what you say. Hope that makes sense.
They have more success cold approaching than on online dating, since they don’t get enough matches and most of them lose interest in a few texts.
You find yourself what’s motivating for you, my job here isn’t to convince you to do cold approaching.
I don’t care what you do, i’m just saying that to discourage someone else from doing something because you suck at it is absurd.
You won’t see me discouraging people from doing online dating because i know people who have very high success on it, even if others completely fail at it.
So you do what works for you.
Also anything discussed in this sub is always anecdotical because someone stats doesn’t actually reflect whether you will have similar success or not.
[–]Kundalini-Electric -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The guy from The Natural Lifestyles does well with Women.
[–]UnclaimedFortune -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Guy who shares edited content that he makes money off of, showcases his “successes”.
Do you believe wrestling is real too?
[–]Kundalini-Electric -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol your very salty
[–]UnclaimedFortune 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What are very good results exactly?
And are you sure the people reporting those “very good” results are honest about the level of effort and time spent to achieve them?
Even the top salesmen have low success rates with cold calling or cold selling and the best results are often driven by persistence and volume rather than technique.
Ultimately, the men who do best with women, don’t chase women.
It doesn’t matter what i tell you, because you like most people on reddit just want to prove other people wrong, no matter what they say.
It also doesn’t matter the stats because someone’s stats doesn’t mean you will have similar stats, since there are many variables.
People are humans not machines, and as such everyone has their own unique set of social skills, charm, humor, wittiness, confidence, style, personality, social intelligence, emotional mood, that all influence whether someone has more success than someone else.
Stats would be useful if you and the person you are comparing yourself with, were exactly the same in every area, like twins who look exactly the same, talk the exact same way, have the exact same confidence, the exact same social skills, exact same experience talking with women, etc
But again all of this doesn’t matter because you are here to say i’m wrong before you even read the first word.
So do what you want
[–]5_7pickup 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I find it funny you think its ineffective when you havent even tried it. You talk about a subject you know nothing about.
Cold approach has exponentially improved my dating life. I started a year ago exactly. During the past year, Ive met thousands of women, slept with dozens, made out with hundreds, and currently have 3 active FWB who I met via cold approach. Refer to my field reports. Ive documented my journey since day 1.
OLD has always been trash for me. 8 years of OLD intermittently with zero results. Never met a girl from OLD.
However OLD can be effective if you do it right. Social circle game is just trash. By the time you meet one attractive single girl via social circle game, I would have met 20 single attractive girls via cold approach.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The thing about sales is that it's all about getting your prospect to MAKE THE DAMN DECISION. You can have the greatest thing to sell, but if they're still humming and hawing over pulling the trigger to purchase, you're still going to get nowhere.
In many cases it has nothing to do with your skill level, the quality of your product, or anything like that. It's all about getting them to have the courage to feel completely safe and comfortable making the decision, and feel really good about it.
It's the same in pickup. You might not be the best looking or most together man - but none of that actually really matters if you can convince them that sleeping with you is the best decision they've already made. You need to frame that and the reason why they're talking to you is not to screen you out, but to find more reasons to convince themselves that you're exactly what they are after.
[–]Bicepsrage 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If anyone is interested in statistics...
After many years of doing game. I finaly decided to do some stats.
So in May I did 44 approaches in DG...
From 44 approaches Ive got 4 dates 2 Instadates and 1 Pull.
Ive got 2 friends that also do game. And they have said that usualy you get 1pull from 100 approaches.
[–]Nullroute127 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I want to call this defeatest, but it doesn't even sound like you've attempted cold approach?
You seem to draw some conclusion based on your sales experience? You don't even mention what you're selling, how these leads are generated, how your peers perform relative to you, or any pertinent details as to how they're analogous.
You also claim it doesn't work unless you're a college student, or live in a large city... And offer no argument as to why that is.
It seems to me like you gave up on something you never started, or if you did achieved no early success so abandoned the idea.
Every person that was in a relationship, casual or serious met a stranger at some point. Cold approach isn't some witchcraft voodoo, it's merely introducing yourself to strangers in a 'cold' context.
[–]bethnalgreen08 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Sales is not the same thing as cold approach. There’s no monetary benefit, and most people understand sales people(not you) can be slime. Sales is a job that you need to perform your best. When you’re under pressure you may not get the result that you expected. With cold approach there’s no pressure, you sought after the girl at your own pace, at your own time, at your own location, and no supervisor is looking over you and pushing you to get that lady.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
There is pressure. Societal pressure.
Where do you think the term cold approach comes from? Sales, cold and warm leads.
It’s the same game just different goals
[–]CompetitionFair7686 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It’s not the same game, because flirting with women has to be done without outcome dependence. Sales you are forced or be outcome dependant.
Sales you want to get something from someone, when you flirt you are connecting with someone and having fun with that person, sharing laughs, without focusing on the end result.
It’s not the same at all, and the fact that you try to tackle both in the same way, is the reason you fail with women.
You cannot treat women as if they are clients or leads.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
You flirt for a relationship or sex. Not for a “fun time” lol.
[–]CompetitionFair7686 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
No that’s what you do, normal healthy people wanna have fun.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nope, you’re just ignorant
If you say so, at least i get laid. Peace
[–]Connect-Pear-3859 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I'm in sales and when I cold call I have a success rate of 4 out of 10 calls result in a sale.
Im married and have been approached by women when I've been with my wife! I've been at bars on my own and spoken to women (not trying to pick them up) and they've offered me their number but I do decline and point to my ring.
It's about your personality, how you project yourself and your self confidence.
[–]UnclaimedFortune 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I don’t buy that for a second..
The average success rate of cold calling is 1 to 3 percent.. if you were capable of doing 40 percent you would be going around the world being paid millions to train other salespeople
[–]Connect-Pear-3859 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
My commission for last year was $1,157,726 PLUS my base salary.
[–]UnclaimedFortune 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your story of the day is really cool!
It’s a good thing people don’t lie on the internet otherwise you would be a 55 year old man who is either married for 34 years one day or got divorced and spent $5 million on it, the other. You also have the magical ability to own your own business that you either work 3 days a week, or both you and the wife you’ve either divorced or are still married to work 60 hours a week.
Today you a salesman who cold calls and made over a million dollars in commission PLUS his base salary.
It’s weird how hard you try to flex on Reddit. No one cares or believes you.
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cold approach is literally selling yourself and seeking permission to enter their life.
[–]reddunt3 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's not ineffective. You just suck at it if you can't get dates
All the women I’ve dated successfully came from social circle. Even in HS I used social circle.
All the women that ended badly came from cold approach.
Make friends with a couple cute girls, they will have friends.
[–]burncushlikewood 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I disagree, it can be done, you just need game, that's what this sub is all about, but I definitely agree it's not easy, but I have closed from cold approaches. Calling random people on the phone is annoying, it's not an attractive alpha male approaching you and interacting with you, and creating a positive experience
[–]shusain2991 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Believe me online game is also waste. It just create the illusion. The most effective way is social circle game. Then Hot approach is next.
[–]Distinct_Face_5796 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What is hot approach?
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women who already like you
[–]Distinct_Face_5796 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Online only works if you are above average looking. Every attractive guy says "have you tried tinder?" Because for them it works.
[–]Kronuk 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s a skill that can be improved
[–]UncommonSense89 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In terms of your sales clients....have you tried sleeping with them...? 😜
[–]Sure-Wish3240 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cold approach works If you Don't broke both rules.
Much the same way cheesy pick lines work If you are handsome Man and result in harassement charges If you are not.
You correct that If a male is respected and loved among friends and peers his value increases for the females.
[–]melancholichamlet 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If you look like Tom Hiddleston or Henry Cavill, your cold approach would be very effective. Even higher if you’re funny and charming.
If you look like Peter Griffin, talk like Peter Griffin, and act like Peter Griffin, your odds doesn’t look so good.
Success is opportunity meets preparation. People often focus on improving their frequency of opportunities but not always on their preparation.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Tom isn’t going to be approaching random women on the street.
He dates in Hollywood. Through the social circle.
[–]melancholichamlet 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not saying he does, but it helps to look nice.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So what’s your point
[–]NuKidOnThBlokchyn 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You need to factor in the compounding increase in your ability to recognise social cues and smooth over your own "pitch" or "branding".
You shouldn't be thinking about it vs cold calling sales, you should be thinking about it as market research.
Approaching actual girls you're attracted to or socially connected with would be more like cold sales.
Then I'd consider it funneling and pumping buying temperature until "closing" being sex or LTR, whatever your goal.
If you're not making micro adjustments to your pitch, you're not selling, you're spamming. Ask your existing leads what stood out to them, when they decided to make the purchase, what they liked about your pitch. This applies to your job and your game IMO.
Also: as a big user of online game, let's be honest, it's a crutch. It's there to protect you from harsh face to face rejection, which when you're aneasthetised to it, can enable you to be much more congruent with your actual personality around women.
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
2 dates out of 100 is VERY GOOD, also, if ur doing online dating the odds will be MUCH LESS, compared to cold approach
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I simply don’t have patience or time to approach 100 women in my personal time
[–]Economy-Director9690 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
THen develop patience, you only need to talk to like 5 women a day. You can do more casual opens and not open moving sets in busy intersections. If ur not in school its very unlikely you will even have more than 10 female AQUAINTENCES who are single. Also have u considered night game.
[–]surfershane25 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
yeah but who has 20 days to get a date? that would take almost 3 weeks
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It doesnt happen over night, u seem VERY new to game, also have you tried night game, you can get instant makeouts only need to do a few approaches
[–]surfershane25 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bro I was being sarcastic… terrible read
Edit: I’m not OP dog
[–]Jasonhardon -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
You’re one of those guys that doesn’t like to put in the work of doing cold approaches and later says it doesn’t work. You even put in a self limiting belief in there just to justify your own laziness of approaching. Online dating is mostly for shy people, people who are usually not good at socializing face to face with new people.
I don’t waste time on things that are useless
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Well judging by your post you haven’t even tried it so no exp point for you buddy. Btw if you have any sort of game and macho aura about you you won’t get anywhere near 100
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I’ve tried
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Well then keep going, put a target of 30 women up. And no spam approaching, look out for ioi’s to increase chances of success.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
All I know is spam approach
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You’ve got a problem for every solution dontcha
He does, the only reason he is here is because he just wants to hear that his failure with women is not due to his incompetence, when in fact it is.
[–]nevertextgoodnight 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sucks for you dude
[–]atomant88 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yet another post from some keyboard warrior who cant be bothered to go and actually experience what hes talking about. youre wrong. but youll never know it till you try
[–]DiscombobulatedCan8 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
what I like to do is find a girl who is attractive and reading a book by herself. I’ve been able to approach her by asking about her book. But, I’ve never been able to say “hey thought you were hot and wanted to introduce myself” or anything along those lines because I just don’t think it’s me.. but maybe I’m wrong.. I don’t know
[–]Mezmore 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Give it a go sometime - woman love it
Excuse me, would it be horribly inappropriate if I introduced myself? I just think you look amazing and I'd love to meet you.
Just go in guns blazing, be a bit cocky, and own it. 60% of the time, it works everytime.
[–]petkoTHEVIKING 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There's benefits to cold approach to doing it regardless. First of all, you don't need to exclusively do cold approach. Even if you only get 2 dates, it's 2 dates on top of the attention you'd get on dating apps.
Second, cold approach allows you to flex your social skill muscles. Flirting, projecting confidence, and talking to strangers is a skill. Even if you don't get a date, being able to strike up a flirty conversation with someone is good to practice. You can apply these skills on your other dates.
[–]JakeDaAussie 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Keyword - sales, completely different to Meeting actual women/people. And your comparing to sending out either a call or email compared face to face contact
[–]Yo_Techno 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What in the fuck even is this logic?
I have a sales portion of my job and I convert 1 in every 3 or so sales. Does that mean 33.3% of my cold approaches should become dates? sex?
Become more attractive, develop your social skills and you'll get dates from cold approach.
[–]whiplash81 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Telemarketing and email spamming is not the same as seduction.
"Cold approach" is that you attract by interacting.
Nobody likes telemarketers or spam. Everyone likes mingling with people they enjoy.
[–]MA_CA_NV_CA 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BenNewcomb1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cold approach can work but it is harder, by far, than social circle game.
Cold approach works well if you are in a scenario where cold approach makes sense, for example, if you are new to a community or at like a comic book convention where you know everyone there has the same interests.
Even approaching women in bars is a lot easier if you build up a lot of social proof in the bar first then approach.
My preference is social circle game and if I am going to cold approach I do it by building a small social circle where I am, first.
[–]Socialinception 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your math is really silly. You're randomly assuming that sales and cold approaching would have the same rate of success.
Consider that the rate of success in sales is wildly different depending on the industry and type of lead.
Why don't you actually do 100 cold approaches, ask all the ones that don't reject you out, and see what the numbers are?
Rather than deciding that you know the truth without any evidence and then spreading that belief to others.
[–]fuzzifikation 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cold approach is training to talk to strangers. It's not about success. It's training to talk to strangers and to train language and social behavior, despite the inherent fear going with it.
A success is determined by a "good talk" for some 10 min.
[–]Dense-Face-487 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Looking for cues to approach makes cold approach much more effective and efficient. Not as efficient as dating apps or socials media but if you approach 100 women that wanted you to approach, you would achieve more desirable outcomes.
[–]No-Emotion-7053 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not correct, I think I could get 10 dates.
It’s all about where you’re looking and your approach. Warm? What is warm?
Because your marketing department says it is? Everyone is trying to keep their job
[–]puma085 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is not THE only effective way to meet women. There is no ultmate methode.
It depends on the person and age. For guys in my age range mid/late 30s social circle game can suck like in my case. In my circle there are just couples or even maried couples with children.
Not attractive enough for online game. I also cannot get at attached to women online. It just does not click.
You are right cold approach tidious method and it can suck. But for me it is the only way.
It really sucks to be single in the late 30s after a long term relationship.
But whatever I need to try it.
For younger guys your advice might be not bad. If you people are still in their teens or twenties they chance are hight that the social circle is still growing which means potential new partners might happen.
You younglings also might have a different approach to connecting with people online.
[–]Mezmore 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
This just sounds like you haven't actually tried it.
What's the difference between a cold approach and a sales call? Easy - you're demonstrating a HUGE amount of value very quickly when you show you have the balls to approach a woman. That level of value cannot be demonstrated with your job's sales pitch nearly as easily, because you are not selling behavior to your clients.
This is still a numbers game yes - but don't get it twisted, there is no other approach that is anywhere near as effective in getting a woman's attention, and showing her you have what she wants most.
[–]Vancopime 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not saying it doesn’t have its merits, but let’s everyone ask themselves this, what kind of man sits around or loiters around a campus to cat call chicks on a schedule or cold approach on a schedule? Like really honestly. Like do you really think that lowly of yourself?
[–]Regular-Set5076 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A man who does that still has higher status than a coward who only swipes chicks on a screen.
[–]WillyWonker97 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Buuuhhh
[–]Top_Client9752 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think it may help to qualify that comment in terms of objectives. Are you looking for one night stands with physically attractive women, or to build lasting relationships with women you actually value beyond their appearance? The odds of cold approaches of random strangers are not in favour of the latter outcome.
On the other hand, actively involving yourself in communities (IRL) that attract women who share your values and measure up to your idea of quality gives you much better chances of connecting with women you find attractive beyond their appearance. You still need approach skills, but you waste less time harassing women you don’t even end up liking.
Disagree. You work in sales. It is a business. People usually do not like receiving promotive emails. Dating is different thing. Also, even if you are not in college, you can meet many people by having some interesting hobbies and going to many different places and interacting with different social circles
People don’t want unwanted male attention either sadly
This is not true. People/women do want male attention. They just need the man they feel good around, thats all.
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I cant believe any person would upvote this, truly pathetic thread. This thread should be removed and OP should feel bad about himself pushing such dumb self limiting beliefs
I don’t have time to approach 100 women
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You dont have time to go out and have a social life, it takes a few seconds to approach. Do you have time to do online game, because its MUCH FASTER cold approaching, than swiping through hundreds of girls on tinder/bumble then texting a few girls for a couple days for a date, which if ur inexperienced would last like 5 min. COld approach will teach you the process, and will get yo interactions faster.
[–]distawest 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dont be preoccupied with statistics ... even one hit per week is enough
Leave away negative thoughts and concentrate on improving the product , ie yourself
[–]fuzzyD_9 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
has nothing to do with math and all to do with you. choosing the right people managing your state, gaming well... could be 0 could be 10 could be 30 if you're great an aligned and flowing. women aren't buying products they're buying you.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Canadian-Seductioner 38 points39 points40 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CaptainDolin 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Canadian-Seductioner 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Technical_Hawk8547 22 points23 points24 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PainDevourer 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KingKlob 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 41 points42 points43 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]FiftyNereids 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]m7h2 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mistermistery101 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mistermistery101 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mistermistery101 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mistermistery101 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 -1 points0 points1 point (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 -1 points0 points1 point (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_History_4728 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kundalini-Electric -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kundalini-Electric -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]5_7pickup 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bicepsrage 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nullroute127 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bethnalgreen08 9 points10 points11 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Connect-Pear-3859 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Connect-Pear-3859 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnclaimedFortune -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reddunt3 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]burncushlikewood 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shusain2991 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Distinct_Face_5796 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Distinct_Face_5796 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kronuk 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UncommonSense89 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sure-Wish3240 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]melancholichamlet 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]melancholichamlet 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NuKidOnThBlokchyn 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Economy-Director9690 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]surfershane25 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]surfershane25 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jasonhardon -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Repulsive-Fee393 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompetitionFair7686 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nevertextgoodnight 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]atomant88 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiscombobulatedCan8 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mezmore 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]petkoTHEVIKING 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JakeDaAussie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yo_Techno 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whiplash81 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MA_CA_NV_CA 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BenNewcomb1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Socialinception 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuzzifikation 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dense-Face-487 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]No-Emotion-7053 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]puma085 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mezmore 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vancopime 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Regular-Set5076 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WillyWonker97 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Top_Client9752 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Economy-Director9690 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]distawest 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuzzyD_9 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link