I am talking about post birth paternity tests. Yes I know you can just do it in secret (so long as you don't live in France). That is not the point of the post. Please do not respond with "hurr durr just do it in secret you autist". I am arguing that you shouldn't have to do it in secret, as the negative judgement for getting a paternity test is not justified. I tell my partners that I will get a paternity test if they get pregnant, and if they negatively respond and tell me they won't want me to do that, then I don't engage in sex with them, so this is not an issue that affects me, so please don't condescendingly respond as if I don't know how to navigate this issue IRL.

Here are some arguments for why paternity tests are reasonable. This is a debate on the reasonableness of paternity tests.

  1. Precautionary measures are not an accusation. Barcode scanners when you walk out of a shop are not an accusation of stealing. Airline security is not an accusation that you are a terrorist.
  2. Many people trust their partners 100% just to get cheated on. Trust doesn't mean jack shit.
  3. Up to 2-4% of fathers are raising kids that are not theirs. Most of these guys trusted their partner and so "you should trust your partner don't get a paternity test" doesn't mean shit. For little cost they could have prevented it.
  4. An analogous scenario where a paternity test would be reasonable: Let's say that you are hypothetically a women (the type of woman that has a vagina). Your best friend works at the hospital and turns out to be your nurse for the day. She helps you give birth and handles your baby as you leave the room, suddenly sick. You haven't had a chance to see the baby yet. When you come back, she gives the baby to you. The next day you go home with the baby. You get a text message from the hospital that 2% of the babies had been swapped by one of the nurses at the hospital in the last year, they just found out and they don't know who did it and are investigating. You go and get a paternity test on your baby. It confirms that it is your baby. Your friend is the only nurse that handled your baby. She is furious at you. She cuts you out of her life. I think that you getting the paternity test was reasonable and that she was wrong for cutting you out of her life.
  5. An analogous scenario 2: You are buying a house from your friend. They say they already got it inspected by the best inspector in the state, so you don't have to. You contact the inspector and ask them to send you the result of the inspection. They say that the house is OK. Then you buy the house. They found out and are furious. They say, "How dare you accuse me of trying to scam you" and cut you out of their life. I think this is comparable to getting a paternity test and I think both are reasonable precautions to take. Lets say that the cheating clause is extended to the period of time before you were married (idgaf if it's not admissible).
  6. Prenups: If your partner asks for a cheating clause in a prenup, I don't think that that is an accusation that you cheated on them or would cheat on them (let's say hypothetically it's legally admissible idgaf). I think it is reasonable, if anything just for peace of mind even if you trust them 100% and and "know" they won't cheat on you. This is comparable to paternity tests I think.
  7. Sometimes it takes a scenario involving a family member for you to empathise with an issue. Let's see if you can empathize with your hypothetical son. Lets say that your hypothetical son asks you for advice. His wife just gave birth and he wants to get a paternity test on their child. He says he knows she hasn't cheated on him, but just wants the peace of mind so he can be the best father he can be. What do you tell him? Do you scold him for not "trusting" his wife? If you do tell him off, and if he listens to you and doesn't get the paternity test, then what happens in 18 years when the baby is an adult and in this scenario they find out that your hypothetical son isn't the father? When your son gets divorced and loses his house, would you feel empathy for him for the fact he gave so much to raise a child that isn't his for someone that cheated on him because of you? A simple test could have prevented that, yet you naively told him against it. He now cuts you off and goes no-contact. Do you think that's fair of him to do? If he remarries and has another kid, would you support him getting a paternity test?
  8. If you think getting a paternity test deserves negatively judgement, then would you still negatively judge someone that got a paternity test on the newborn child only to find out that the child is not theirs? I can see NO reason to negatively judge someone for a paternity test that relieved them of fathering a kid that is not theirs. This can happen even if the husband 100% trusted his wife. Just like we shouldn't MMQB sports and judge detroit for going for the 4th down conversion based off of the result of the action, instead we should judge the decision to go for the action itself. We shouldn't judge someone's action of getting a paternity test based off the result, but rather on the action itself. It shouldn't be conditionally justified if the kid is not yours, and not justified if the kid is yours. That is MMQBing. It should be justified in both cases. Just like Dan Campbell shouldn't be judged for his decision to go for the 4th down conversion differently if it fails than to if it succeeds.
  9. If I went off for a very long work trip and came back, and my wife asked for a STD test and we both got one, I would not be offended at all, in fact I would want to do one for her so she could have the peace of mind.
  10. If a magically genie came down to my wife and told her he can tell her if I have EVER cheated on her, all she has to do is ask it, and she asked me what she should do, I would 100% tell her to ask it! Give her the peace of mind! I would not at all be offended.

Regarding empathy, I think that if even 1% of women in America turned out to be raising kids that weren't theirs, it would become a national issue immediately and would be pushed to the front of the election cycle with billions invested to ending such fraud. (I know it's not comparable or realistic because mothers know the kid is theirs). But since it affects men, nobody cares. The rate of fraud is up to 2-4%: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733152/

Rates vary between studies from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%, n = 17).

And yet some countries like France consider the position of a father raising a kid that's not his and spending upwards of 6 figures, to be not important, with the most important issue of paternity fraud deemed to be how it affects the mother.

Public health consequences of PD being exposed include family break up and violence

What are your thoughts, or am I just autistic?

Now, all this being said, I think mandatory paternity testing in places where abortion is encouraged would NOT be politically passable, as the mothers would just abort the kids after getting pregnant from cheating and when no PDs are reported, it would be scrapped.

My conclusion is that the social stigma of getting a paternity test should not exist.