The red pill gets a lot of flack for its views on women as though it is an attack on women but I was thinking about this recently and, well, what does the red-pill actually do to women that isn't just a reaction to how women act? Isn't this the point? To not be blinded by what we are told by women and instead use female nature to know what is actually expected from us as men in order to have a high SMV and RMV. We've all heard of the "good guy", "bad guy" scenario. How do we think this even came to be such a debated topic? Women tell men one thing and leave out a lot of important details so every man's head kind of turns when there is little correlation between what she said and what she did. The red pill provides the answers so men don't have to be confused, it levels the playing field.

I wouldn't doubt that most red-pilled men begin as nobodies that are ignored by women. They stumble across the red pill and learn about female nature, what they are attracted to and self reflect to learn why women don't pay them much attention. So they work on themselves and eventually begin to attract female attention and by this time they only know how to interact with women in accordance to the red pill. They notice the mind-games, they pass the shit-tests, if they know that they look good they know they can get away with a little more etc... a lot of these men have learned to understand everything women don't want to communicate but like and so they react accordingly to whatever she says and does in order to be successful in dating. Where exactly is the "attack" taking place? Is it simply because of how cold this thought process is? I guess, at the very least, you could argue that this is manipulation but then anything women do to draw commitment out of men is just as manipulative.