~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
gwolf100
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]853211 107 points108 points109 points 14 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
Is there some sort of top-secret, patriarchal power that I haven't accessed yet?
You have to get to level 30 for that skill.
[–]hardwarequestions 60 points61 points62 points 14 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link
actually, at the last grand patriarchy regional convention we took a vote and upped that to level 35.
[–]typhonblue 36 points37 points38 points 14 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Have you done anything about the fact that most men only ever achieve level five before they die? How about the bug wherein any female character can de-level a man whenever she wants?
[–]hardwarequestions 29 points30 points31 points 14 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Have you done anything about the fact that most men only ever achieve level five before they die?
we're bringing in a consulting firm next quarter to take a look at that issue. the hope is to really think outside the box, actualize our maximum potential, and synergy.
How about the bug wherein any female character can de-level a man whenever she wants?
it was on the minutes, intended for discussion, but we ran out of time and tabled the matter until the next meeting.
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 14 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
nods
Synergy.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men are sometimes their own worst enemies.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Not necessarily saying I disagree, but not sure I understand... What is the connection?
[–]PandaSandwich 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can't find it either, however he is being downvoted for being a spammer
[–]Wordshark 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This jagoff is a regular spammer here. Report, downvote, move on.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SchrodingersRapist 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
...and in breaking news a majority of deaths linked to breathing oxygen.
Come on, seriously? Give us a link to a real study or just go back to whatever bridge you crawled out from under.
[–]typhonblue 6 points7 points8 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
tabled the matter until the next meeting.
What a surprise you're not addressing it in light of the rumour that the development team perpetuates this female deleveling racial spec in order to syphon newbie skill points to the development team itself.
[–]hardwarequestions 10 points11 points12 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
don't you worry about BLANK, let me worry about BLANK.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Blank? BLANK!? You're not looking at the bigger picture!
[–]iongantas 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't forget to leverage your liquidity.
[–]Dranosh 9 points10 points11 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Man, I've heard some things about women are hacking and actually out leveling men by about 5 levels on average, I also heard it's government backed... this shit is scary.
[–]Yillpv 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
and women have a game genie that lets them jump ahead to whatever level they want(often achieved by false-rape accusations)
[–]Lohengren 10 points11 points12 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Do you still have to spec into the Alpha Male talent tree?
[–]hardwarequestions 7 points8 points9 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
formally, no. you can "donate" your way in...
[–]Jakome 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What is this World of Warcraft? I finally get to lvl 28 and they go and up the cap! You bastards
[–]853211 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Damn, they never invite me to those things.
[–]hardwarequestions 6 points7 points8 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
you need to have less female facebook friends. anything more than 20% is an instant disqualification from attendance.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsPheErBj8
[–]hardwarequestions 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W48f7diVZn4
[–]rusty_chipmunk 30 points31 points32 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No man should be afraid to walk around at night theres no way one could possibly be murdered, robbed, kidnapped, or raped (especially raped because only men rape women no way a women ever could). /s
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
of course, everybody knows that men share resources hive-mind like, so if one man "robs" (really, it's more like emergency borrowing) another, all you have to do is send a petition to the grand high patriarch and you'll get your shit back within twelve hours. Tops.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hey now, sometimes it takes more than 12 hours, but at that point there is usually interest. I believe the last time I checked the High Patriarch of Finance had set the interest rate to 38.4% for every day past 48 hours, so we're really making a profit in some cases.
[–]Colcut 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
shhhhhhh.
I'll have the info packet sent to you.
[–]PacoBedejo 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Apparently these women haven't quite figured this out yet:
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/yp4eea4ba6.jpg
[–]altmehere 12 points13 points14 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
With the way some women seem to think about men being anywhere near them, asking them out for coffee, or otherwise existing, I'm not sure suggesting this (rather than pepper spray) is a good idea.
Add that with male disposability and more lenient sentences for women, and I'd rather not see the use of lethal force encouraged.
[–]17-40 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I walk one of these when I'm out. People cross the street to avoid me.
Wow, I never even considered that female-specific holsters would exist, but I imagine most chest holsters would be uncomfortable for most women.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm sorry, but that pic is really hot.
[–]hardwarequestions 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
holy crap, i haven't seen a abovetopsecret link in...i don't know...a decade. nostalgia...
[–]xXBlUnTsM0KA420Xx 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If anyone gets the drop on you you wont have time to pull any weapon out from anywhere, if anything carrying a weapon will just give a higher feeling of security which leads to doing more silly things, like walking down that dark alleyway.
[–]jlennon4422 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No, pepper spray/mace is your best bet. Most women (or anybody, for that matter) isn't prepared to take a life, and if you're packing heat you better be prepared to use it or you risk being disarmed. Also, killing the attacker should be avoided if non-lethal methods are available. Mace is also much cheaper, more reliable, and requires zero training
[–]PacoBedejo 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Those chemicals don't work well at all. Before I knew my legal rights as a citizen to assist law enforcement, I got to watch an off-duty officer chase down & attempt to subdue a shoplifter. The officer had mace with him & tried to take the large shoplifter down. Each of them got about a half-dose of mace, as the shoplifter raised his hand, splashing it back at the officer. In the end, the shoplifter's mom/girlfriend/hoe/whatever drove up & he hopped in to get away.
I'm pretty sure that if he was a determined attacker instead of a fleeing shoplifter, the chemical spray wouldn't have done dick.
Personally, I'm prepared to shoot someone if they need shot in order to stop their threat to life or property. Each day I holster my pistol, I pray that's where it will stay until I take it off that night. If I ever need it, though, it's there & will be used. People make bad choices & if they put me in a situation where I need to stop their actions, that's on them.
[–]mordicaii 10 points11 points12 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Ssshhh Don't let our secret out! /s
This is ridiculous, though. The notion that men prowl the streets looking for women to rape is absurd. It does certainly happen, but we are talking about a relatively small portion of the population. The fault is not completely on guys, though.
Common sense dictates that one should not venture down a dark alley at night. If you do so and you are raped/mugged/killed/exsanguinated/etc, that's your fault. You chose to venture down that path, knowing full-well that something bad may happen. People need to be careful in the more dangerous parts of the city, particularly at night - bad shit happens. If it happens to you, and you walked into it, you are still at fault. Just like going down that alley, don't put yourself in harm's way.
I don't advocate victim blaming, I think it is a stupid practice, but at some point, you have to realize that the victim may very well be at fault, at least partially. For example, you go into the more minority-filled areas of your city and start calling people '<insert derogatory slur here>', you are likely going to get hurt, or (at the very least) severely chastised. While it is, in part, the residents' fault for not controlling themselves, it is also your fault for waking the lion - had you not done that, you likely would not have reaped the consequences. The same can be said about going out at night. People in general, not just women, need to be careful. People are going to mug, rape, and kill other people. It is the responsibility of the person taking the risk to understand the risk and to adjust their behaviour accordingly. You can't expect someone dead-set on mugging some poor sap to not mug them. You cannot control their behaviour, you can only control your own.
This may seem to be somewhat in the same vein as "If you didn't want to get raped, you should have worn a longer skirt". In some respects it is, the concept that not just the perpetrator is at fault, for example. However, the short skirt bit is just stupid. It is a small factor in a much larger issue, and issue that could probably have been avoided with a little situational awareness.
We don't need to teach boys to not rape, and we don't need to teach girls not to go out at night. We need to teach both how to avoid dangerous situations and how to properly comport oneself when in a dangerous situation.
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
"relatively small portion"?
More like an INCREDIBLY small portion. Probably less than 0.0001%
That would mean 1 in every 10,000 men prowl the streets looking for women to rape.
[–]typhonblue 23 points24 points25 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And likely they became so via graduating from our state sponsored rape farms (aka. juvenile detention centres.)
Source: 95% of sexually abused youth in correctional facilities reported being abused by female staff. From Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities, 2008-09
[–]cscx 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Rape Farm" would be a good band name.
Sorry if this doesn't necessarily add anything substantial to the conversation, but I worked in a Chinese restaurant while I was in high school that was owned by an older Chinese woman. She wrote her own phrases for fortune cookies, and would often hand cookies with the fortune "Avoid dark alleys" to the high school girls who would come in. I have to admit I thought it was pretty hilarious to see this girls crack open the fortune cookie and read that.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
CC and your local firearms dealer.
[–]RadioFreeReddit 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, you have unlock all of your chakras though.
[–]gingerkid1234 36 points37 points38 points 14 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link
Why exactly was this in /r/atheism?
[–]vote4petro 9 points10 points11 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because r/atheism seems to be the platform for any type of political advocacy, so long as one of its tenets opposes a religious (read as: Christian) view. Apparently, it's also The Place To Be for gay rights as well as abortion policies.
[–]a_weed_wizard 49 points50 points51 points 14 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
There is a lot of feminist appropriation in the so-called atheist community. Yes, too many people who claim to not believe in fairy tales like a god or gods instead choose to believe in fairy tales like the patriarchy or rape culture.
[–]TheWanderingJew 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Part of why I really don't give a shit that atheism is growing in the US, despite being an atheist myself. I'm a skeptic first and foremost, the atheism is just a byproduct of it. And I've seen time and time again all manner of magical thinking take the place of religion in cultures and subcultures that lose it. The amount of people on /r/atheism who belive in ghosts or aliens is a bit depressing.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What degree of alien are we talking about here?
If UFO flew over kansas and abducted cow then no.
If possible primitive life within the galaxy or quite possibly similarly or more advanced civilizations farther than we can actively observe at the time being, then I think that's plausible if not necessarily probable.
[–]CandidWalrus 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Everyone needs an imaginary friend, just not "their" imaginary friend, apparently
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 14 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
I think rational atheist leaders resist Femist encroachment. Dawkins sure did a good job of calling out Watson, and put her into place during ElevatorRapeGate.
[–]Seacrest_Hulk 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Hitchens (R.I.P.) certainly resisted.
[–]down_vote_that 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's saying that it's the man who should have to stick to the traditional roles and go to work, while the woman has the choice.
I thought this subreddit was against all that crap...
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I never really understood the deal with ElevatorGate. Sorry to differ from the hivemind, it kind of seemed like Watson was just saying that it's not really socially acceptable to hit on someone after they had finished saying that they were sick and tired of being hit on all the time at conferences. I don't think she was trying to make some sort of law against it or anything, and she wasn't saying that she was traumatized by a guy hitting on her, she just seemed to be telling guys that that behavior is kind of obnoxious.
I guess I'm really unsure where the whole "controversy" came from, or why people got so up-in-arms about it. If someone could please explain that for me I'd really appreciate it, because as I see it right now, it seems like tons of people made a massive shitstorm over a single throwaway comment.
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
She made it sound like being talked to in an elevator was practically being sexually accosted. She did make it sound like she was traumatized.
She later went on to say "socially awkward nerds" are literally the biggest problem the reason community has to face and they should be dealt with. If she threw a neckbeard virgin shame in there, she would be at home in srs.
[–]a_weed_wizard 7 points8 points9 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The aftermath of the whole thing made it crystal clear that what she was really against was men she is not attracted to approaching her, and she manipulatively tried to compare it to attempted rape to not look like an obvious bag of shit.
If she threw a neckbeard virgin shame in there, she would be at home in srs.
She's gone on record as really loving srs.
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can I get a link to that? I know that she constantly feeds the trolls, but I've never heard her say that.
Haha, figures. Do you think she could be an Archangel or other major user?
I'm a guy, and I get hit on frequently when I go out. I got hit on 3 times last night. Were I single, I'd be all for it, but as it stands I'm happy with the person I'm with. Should I whine and bitch about it like she did?
The controversy came from the fact she shunned normal human interaction, and tried to paint the guy as being some rape crazed creep, when she herself mentions that all he said was that he wanted to have coffee and talk to her, as if that was some kind uncommon occurrence in the course of human history. Coffee? Must have sexual intentions. He could have been gay. Could have been bi. Could have been asexual. Could have had a gf/wife/whatever. Nah, surely he just wanted to spank Rebecca Watson.
And for NotC, she did basically say he was an aspie virgin neckbeard type.
To be fair, he did explicitly ask for her to join him in his room for coffee. I think that that's generally considered pretty creepy if you don't know someone very well.
[–]TheWanderingJew 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I was totally meh on the elevator thing. The fact that she posts on srs, and thinks it's high quality, was the big mark against her for me. I try not to hold what sites people post on against them. But that's pretty much the one where it's hard to respect anyone after finding out they approve of it.
She thinks "freethoughtblogs" is high quality lol.
Wait, she does? Can I get some links? I'd be interested to see if her reddit account is verified as hers, as well as seeing if she really thinks srs is serious.
Perhaps I am different in this, but I approve of SRS...
because it allows me to glance at its front page and say "Oh good, I'm still not batshit crazy."
Not said once at this conference. this is a lie.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
put her into place
This wording says so much about you.
You would have a point if I said "put her in her place", meaning keeping down an uppity, but I just said "in place". It means he aligned her to reality and told her how it is.
[–]loose-dendrite 9 points10 points11 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Perhaps they're atheist because they hate Christianity, not because they care about actually knowing the truth. Christianity certainly has misogyny and loads of sexism so feminists will often become non-Christian. Usually atheist because they aren't going to pick up another religion when they see there're no need for one.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is pretty much how it is. They became atheists via the rejection of religion because of its tenets, not the embrace of objectivity, reason, or science.
[–]dregle 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A lot of people are atheistic because of both being against religious norms and the dismissal of making as many unfounded assumptions as possible. I don't know that being a feminist makes you inherently prone to either ideal.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Such a viewpoint would be somewhat ironic as Reddit itself is a good example of a misogynistic Anti-theist community.
[–]FOADSASCUM 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is a lot of feminist appropriation in the so-called atheist community.
Which I find utterly hilarious given how much of a hardon that subreddit has for being critical of your ideas and beliefs.
[–]buylocal745 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
GINGERKID! My /r/Christianity/ /r/DebateReligion friend! You're here too?
[–]gingerkid1234 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So it seems.
[–]radeky 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It was posted with the title: Even in a religious country like India, rape is still prevalent. This is a campaign started by our youth.
Equating this with religion.
[–]TjPshine -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It could potentially be because some of the redditors in /r/atheism think that some religions teach men to oppress women?
I have no opinion on that, and I have no idea if that is why it was in /r/atheism
Possibly just because /r/athiesm is a circlejerk and not a real discussion platform.
[–]Hach8 6 points7 points8 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The thing I don't like about this most of all (and it took me a little while to realize it today) is that these types of statements - "Teach our boys to not rape" - makes the default state of being for men that of a rapist.
As if the absence of someone teaching boys that rape is wrong means they will almost certainly grow up to be rapists. Treating men as if they are default rapists is not good for our culture.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Legolihkan 14 points15 points16 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If i had a nickel for every time my sons raped my daughters... I'd be broke.
[–]Phuzzums 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why does it have to be about teaching the girls to suspect and live their life in fear of being raped at any second and teach the boys that they are dirty little monsters if they even have a sexual thought about a girl?
The damage of that kind of teaching is two-fold:
It makes girls paranoid, always looking over their shoulder, never trusting their peers. That's some stressful shit, it makes them angry at society and potentially makes them see all men as nothing but monsters.
It gives boys insanely mixed messages about their sexuality to the point where they might think that just the fact that they find girls attractive makes them a bad person. The compounded by the lack of an outlet to express their feelings and emotions, they either give up trying to stop themselves and accept themselves as bad and go on to sate their desires in inappropriate ways by invading girls personal space or they just completely break down into depression and self-loathing which may lead to suicide.
A better way is to teach boys more about personal boundaries and that it isn't appropriate to invade others' personal space. It is perfectly fine for boys to find girls sexually attractive and arousing, it's normal and natural. It doesn't hurt the girl, the harm comes when the boy inappropriately invades her personal space.
At the same time the trend of teaching girls that all men are potential rapists needs to change as well. People who invade a girls personal space are potential rapists. Teach them that they have a right to their personal space, that if anyone decides to force their way in to tell them to get away. I think some girls would also benefit a lot from the same teaching of personal boundaries as well. I see a lot of girls who think that because society doesn't see them as rapists that they are allowed to freely invade others' personal space. They don't have that right, it is just as inappropriate for a girl to do it as a boy.
[–]garthunk 45 points46 points47 points 14 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
before you all get your boxers in a twist, you should actually check out the incident that led to this response: http://zeenews.india.com/news/assam/guwahati-girl-molestation-it-was-like-gang-rape-says-reporter_787411.html
this isn't a case of some stupid naive girl going to a bad part of town. this is a case of a 17/20 yr old girl (some sources claim 17, others 20) going out to have some fun with friends, then being molested in a public, well-trafficked street, without anyone doing shit to stop it until the police showed up nearly 30 minutes after it started.
no one is trying to blame men or paint us as rape-machines. they are merely trying to draw attention to the fact that rape is treated as the victim's fault in their country.
and one other thing, go ahead and cruise on over to the r/atheism post and read through some of their responses. people are more than ready to jump on the "blame the victim" bandwagon by talking as if this happened in some slum. it didn't. this happened in a well-trafficked, highly visible area of town.
Yet another example of how scary the bystander effect is.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
WWYD it's not just Asia, folks.
this is a case of a 17/20 yr old girl (some sources claim 17, others 20) going out to have some fun with friends, then being molested in a public, well-trafficked street, without anyone doing shit to stop it until the police showed up nearly 30 minutes after it started.
What?! Didn't they see the sign??
[–]garthunk 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
the bystander effect is well documented in psychological and sociological texts, studies, etc.
however, as has been theorized, the bystander effect is a symptom of the social norms of a society, not the cause. to turn this to a discussion about the bystander effect is merely deflecting from the real problem, which is the way that women are treated in their society, especially in regards to rape.
instead of merely attempting to find and prosecute as many of the perpetrators as possible, the city government wants to set a curfew for women (not men) so that they can avoid being raped. hence, the graphic and campaign in reaction to that sentiment.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If you'd watched the video, you'd see that this isn't about the bystander effect. It's about how people react differently to female perpetrated abuse.
I haven't been able to find out anything about a curfew being imposed.
[–]garthunk 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i've seen the video in more psychology and sociology classes than i care to remember. but it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
i'll try to provide you a link to a source for the curfew thing if you actually give a shit, but i highly doubt that you do.
[–]Yillpv 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
exactly! it would be just as dumb if it were the other way around: like if you say (hypothetically) "men fight at bars when they get drunk, so no drunk men are allowed at bars." BS, you need to fix the mentality that allows these crimes to be perpetrated, not simply get rid of potential victims.
[–]garthunk 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are the first person that has replied to any of my posts on this topic (in this thread and others) that actually seems to understand the point. Kudos my friend.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Of course it did. Your brain is telling you that females aren't dangerous.
Unless she had a weapon.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Ok i'm sorry I didn't know the full story behind this, but even with the additional information the statement of:
Don't teach your daughters not to step out in the night, teach your sons better
heavily implies that your sons aka men are rapists or will sexually molest a woman because that's who they are.
Here is a thought, why could no one step in and defend this young woman if it was happening in front of people? Hows about "Don't allow injustice to happen in front of you and do nothing, teach your children to do the right thing."
Sure blame should be put on the abuser, but for all the people who saw and did nothing where is their shame? They witnessed it and did nothing, but it's far easier to say "Men are rapists" than to admit "I saw it happening and was to scared and/or selfish to do anything about it."
Edit: I believe the quote is from Edmund Burke which states "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" now, obvious misogyny-bait aside, that quote pretty much sums up what I was saying. The reason something like that can happen is not because a son was not "taught better" it is because the abuser was allowed to do it. Had any of those people had the courage to step in and help that girl away rather than standing and staring she could have been saved.
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
i fully agree that a campaign to encourage bystanders to take action when seeing injustice occur would be a great idea, as opposed to laying blame on anyone other than the perpetrators of this incident.
however, i also believe that turning this around into a "it's your fault you got raped because you went somewhere you shouldn't have" is ignoring the real underlying problem, which is the way rape is perceived in their society.
also, a few (obviously not enough) people did try to step in. one man in particular was also beaten and forced away from the girl when he tried to help.
i think your point regarding the bystander effect definitely has merit, but i also think that when it's ~30 men, all attacking and molesting one girl, that fairly well shows that it's not just a matter of people not doing anything to stop it. it shows that the social norms and mores of that society are ignoring the real problem, and this campaign is then a response to their predilection to blame the victim.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Sorry but it wasn't 30 men. The journalist who caught it on film stated 11 men, some of them have already been taken into custody and the others are being actively searched for. It was not a riot with a swelling throng of men assaulting her, it was 11 men. Meaning if a small fraction of the onlookers had stepped in they could have separated her from the pack.
Also, my point was never that this was a woman taking a risk by being out at night, my point was that the caption expressed in the OP image is, for lack of a better phrase, fucking stupid. It expresses the mentality I described of:
it's far easier to say "Men are rapists" than to admit "I saw it happening and was to scared and/or selfish to do anything about it."
If they want to stop things like that from happening, the way to do it would be to encourage people to take action to help. Not to encourage people to assume that men are rapists or would actively partake in something like that simply because they are men.
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
wrong. 11 men were identified on camera. more were in the mob that were not identified on camera.
Not to encourage people to assume that men are rapists or would actively partake in something like that simply because they are men.
again, no one has ever said that men are rapists simply because they are men. the text implies that some men are rapists because they have not been taught better by their parents, and consequently, the social norms and mores of their society need to change.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You just proved my point for me
the text implies that some men are rapists because they have not been taught better by their parents
So they are rapists because they are men and weren't told not to do it? Not because they are sick fucking individuals, but because they are men and would just naturally do that?
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i don't know how many times i need to say this for it to sink in.
those men are most likely NOT sick fucking individuals, but are men that have been raised in a society that does not value women as highly as they do men, and do not look at rape in the same way a a westernized society does, thereby allowing things like this to happen.
i really don't understand how you are so blind as to miss this point. instead of recognizing this, it's sickening really. you're trying to defend something that needs to defense, because it isn't being attacked, except in your own twisted perception that is looking for hidden meanings in a very short, straight-forward sentence. this is not a conspiracy against men ffs.
[–]esskaay 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
that rape is treated as the victim's fault in their country.
Where did you get this piece of wisdom?
[–]sorry4partying 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can't speak for India but in Sri Lanka rape is 100% treated as the victim's fault.
When a woman is raped, she is not considered the victim, she is seen as the perpetrator. She is usually either killed by her families for bringing shame to the family, or (more often) will kill herself before her families have the chance to. A man who rapes a woman would be condemned by his family but he would be punished very lightly in comparison.
I'd imagine it is the same in India as well as most Muslim countries.
[–]garthunk -3 points-2 points-1 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
so telling women to not go out after a certain time doesn't imply that getting raped is their own fault? seriously? if you don't see that, then you're naive at best, ignorant at worst.
[–]Klaue 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Actually, I think you might be the ignorant here. Does encurage people to get self-defense lessons imply that it's their fault when they're attacked? Do side-airbags imply it's the victims fault if they die when another car crashes into theirs? Or, to get a more similar example, is it victim-blaming if you tell someone to better not drive trough the ghetto? Telling someone "well it's your fault you were raped because you went out at night" is victim-blaming. Telling them that it might be more secure not to go outside at night is not, it's a piece of advice.
Same goes, btw, for the ol' slutty clothes one. Telling someone (s)he should better not wear slutty clothes because of rape is an advice (if good or not is not the focus here). Telling someone (s)he was raped because of the slutty clothes is victim-blaming.
That may be the situation in your country. But in Sri Lanka rape is 100% treated as the victim's fault.
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
you accidentally words, but that's ok, i got the gist of what you're driving at.
Does encurage people to get self-defense lessons imply that it's their fault when they're attacked? Do side-airbags imply it's the victims fault if they die when another car crashes into theirs?
no, none of those things implies that it is the victim's fault when something bad happens. however, the city government of Guwahati has attempted to put a curfew into place, thereby requiring BY LAW that women do not go out after a certain time of night for fear of being raped. there's a huge difference here. no one is saying it MIGHT be a good idea, it's not advice-giving when it's a law, it's a commandment, which pushes it into another realm.
[–]Klaue 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
oh, if it's by law, you're right, missed that tidbit. Have my upvote then. Maybe you should add that to your above post, it's quite important to get you right, as "telling woman" is a bit different from "forcing women"
[–]InfallibleBiship -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I know the idea is to not blame the victim, but I don't get how this is helpful at all.
it may not be helpful in itself, but at the very least, it draws attention to the fact that making women stay indoors after a certain hour for fear of being raped is not a valid solution.
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 14 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Teach both... imo
[–]lalit008 8 points9 points10 points 14 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
Thereby implying that all men need to be taught not to be criminals.
[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 14 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Yes...
From a young age we should teach all individuals that they should not be criminals. This involves teaching children:
Not to steal
Not to kill
Not to rape
Etc.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Not to steal sure. But children are not naturally predisposed to rape and pillaging so I disagree that those are "lessons" children need to learn.
[–]Stophon 19 points20 points21 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
the impression i got from the comment was to teach kids the difference from right and wrong. not a direct teaching of do not rape, but morals. something a lot of young people these days seem to be lacking.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Children grow up into people...
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I'm sure all those rapists never had The Talk with their parents about how having sex with someone against their will is bad.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
That's not what I meant.
Do you know that rape is bad? You must have been taught that at some point, yes?
Are you saying we shouldn't teach children rape is bad and let them figure it out for themselves? You don't think that won't increase the rate of rape, if not only slightly?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I know that rape is wrong, but no one ever had to sit me down and explain that it is not okay to impose your will on someone else, or to force them to do something against their will, or to violently force them into a twisted mockery of sex.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
And you just intrinsically knew that? Someone must have told you at some point, even if it was your parents saying: "don't hit."
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Do you equate a parent saying "Don't hit your brother" to someone telling you that rape is wrong?
[–]Yillpv 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
abstinence only education then?
I think children learn violent tendencies from adults. I imagine if the child has a wholesome upbringing than I highly doubt that child will grow up and think "I should start raping people."
My point being that the conversation is superfluous and the true lessons are taught at a much deeper level. If you child grows up to be a rapist, it's not because you didn't tell him raping was bad, it's because you raised a criminal through your own parental actions.
[–]Roddy0608 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It's kind of insulting when you're assumed to be a criminal by nature and have to be taught otherwise.
When did I say that?
[–]Roddy0608 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You could say to not teach to instead of to teach not to. Slight difference.
[–]Minkatte 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Shouldn't all members of functional first world societies be taught this, regardless of gender..?
[–]papasuckle55 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
what does this have to do with Atheism?
[–]Irrel_M 6 points7 points8 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Logic would apply the same to both genders.
But no, that's just silly!
[–]duglock 10 points11 points12 points 14 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Before even clicking I knew this would have something to do with the stars. r/atheism is so fucking predictable.
[–]topherotica 8 points9 points10 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
As a member of both /r/mensrights and /r/atheism I have to say that this is the 1 comment I knew I'd find here.
[–]loose-dendrite 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Does the predictability not bore you?
[–]topherotica 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's actually pretty frustrating. It's like, "why am I even on Reddit?"
Why would I pay attention to a message labeling me as a rapist when i'm not a criminal? It makes me instantly ignore any meaning behind this once I get accused of a crime I have never committed.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
So women aren't responsible for their own well being, but men are responsible for the actions of all male criminals? How much collective blame is going to be shifted onto men before everyone realizes this is ridiculous?
Statements like "teach men not to rape" are fucking stupid, because it implies that society doesn't already do that. Not only do we do that by telling everyone men how wrong it is to rape (because only men can rape after all, right?), but we also do it by THROWING RAPISTS IN JAIL. These people who say this stuff are so delusional and arrogant that they actually think that their shaming tactics are a greater deterrent for crime than prison time, which is moronic.
Criminals can't be reasoned with. Telling them not to rape won't do anything more than them knowing that rapists go to jail. Normal, rational people however can be reasoned with, which is why we tell them ways they can protect themselves. Women who can't take that advice obviously aren't rational people, yet somehow they expect all criminals to be.
You'd probably like this comic.
[–]Dranosh 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Is it me or was I the only male that was ever taught to save sex for marriage, which I'm doing, and that I should never be out at night like 2am walking alone?
Seriously, do parents not teach their kids this shit anymore? I'm debating on whether it's worth raising kids in this world, too many idiots are having sex, you know why I know they're idiots? Because they're the ones not using birth control.
Is it me or was I the only male that was ever taught to save sex for marriage, which I'm doing,
If you're happy with that decision more power to you. I like sex, I like having sex with men and I'm happy I tried everything I wanted to try before I got married. Sex with my husband is something special because it's with him and he's special, not because the act itself is.
and that I should never be out at night like 2am walking alone?
Yes, I was told this and will tell my children the same.
[–]thefieldsofdawn 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't have any problem with it, but I think that we need to teach both sexes about street smarts and respect to others. This isn't attacking all men, at least in my eyes, so please don't get your jimmies in a ruffle
[–]tjbdef 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
just about to post this. pissed me off when I saw it.
[–]chucky2000 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Same here, I came straight to this subreddit as soon as I read it expecting it to be at the top, glad to know lots of others are as disgusted as I am at this.
[–]hardwarequestions 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
i'm actually pleased by the number of non-/mr regulars who have commented in that thread before we even knew about it, expressing sentiments that are much our own.
People say they hate us, but I think they're listening.
Yet another bullshit violation of the is-ought distinction.
My fiancee and I were debating this yesterday, and I came to a realization. See, I get cat called all the time, usually from a moving car. Often, it's just screaming and hollering, but a month ago, I was stopped while riding by bike from a woman in her 40s in her car. The conversation went like this:
Her: "Excuse me, could you help me out?"
Me: "Uh, sure. What can I do for you?"
"Could you give me directions?"
"Probably. Where are you looking to go?"
"A parking lot somewhere around here, close, so you could come and fuck me."
I then said that I was engaged and went on my way biking. The woman then followed me for three more blocks, the final stop flashing me her tits and pressing them against the glass.
Were I the horny little 19 year old I once was, I would have jumped on that in a heart beat. Me as an adult didn't want to deal with crazy, however, so I sped up and zig-zagged into some side streets.
Now, the thought of "Well, I could get stabbed or have my kidney stolen" was there, but the likelihood of it happening was so miniscule in my head that it was a non-issue.
Flip the genders, however, and I guarantee most women would have thought about calling the cops, terrified. In part, sure, maybe strange men are more apt to be dangerous, but I don't think that's the primary reason: it's because, as a guy, you deal with the threat of being assaulted constantly, and no one is going to protect you.
This is the key difference to all this stranger danger nonsense. Men deal with the threat of being murdered, robbed, attacked in such a high number of situations compared to women, and we're expected to deal with it all on your own, and most do, so the implicit 'threat' of women catcalling seems so miniscule in comparison to what is usually par for the course that it doesn't even register as anything worse than annoying for most.
WTF was this doing in r/atheism?
[–]hardwarequestions -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
r/atheism is the new catch all, like r/reddit.com used to be. anything goes there.
Well, until we do actually teach every single boy "better" (which may not even be a realistic goal), we should teach girls to be careful.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Why should we specifically teach every boy to NOT rape? Shouldn't we teach every child as they grow up to not break the law? To not kill, steal, or rape in general? It's pretty sexist to expect us to only teach boys not to rape. That shouldn't even be on the agenda. And no, I'm not victim-blaming. I'm saying that we shouldn't focus so narrowly on males and we shouldn't focus so narrowly on rape. We should just teach people not to do bad things.
I know right?
I upvoted because rape is bad...
But let's be real here, I hate rape for the same reason I hate every other crime. People don't deserve that committed against them. However, just telling people to stop crime, rape or otherwise, will not alone stop crime. There are (rightly so) severe prison sentences for rape. The mention of a rape in real life causes my muscles to tense and for me to worry about all of my female loved ones. I think it's generally accepted that rape is bad.
I teach a women's self-defense course. Am I a rape supported for acknowledging that rape is an unfortunate reality of life and I should therefore be hated because I teach women how to teach potential rapists a lesson? Should I instead spend my time that I would spend teaching that class to go around reminding guys to not rape?
Anyone?
[–]Everseer 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Should I teach my son not to walk off tall buildings or stick his dick in the garbage disposal? No, because that shit is common sense and implying men need to be taught not to rape women is sexist.
[–]ttnorac 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So, I guess rape is the only thing that is dangrous about being alone at night.
Phew....I don't have to worry about robbery, murder, drunk drivers, etc. any more!
Near my college, there has been quite a string of thefts. The perpetrator? a woman and a couple of men. It goes both ways. EQUALITY applies to all sexes, all ages, all races, all religions, not just some.
The picture has also spread in this Facebook page.
[–]Nefilim777 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I hate the presumption that men will rape/maim/kill unless taught to do so...
[–]XxDailyDreamxX 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In my eyes, both genders should be taught better. They should know to defend themselves against threats, but they should also be taught morals.
[–]hardwarequestions -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago* (54 children) | Copy Link
here's the /atheism thread.
good starting points...
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5ev2zp
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5evc8b
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5evl1h
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5evowc
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5exk0z
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5ew4l0
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wnhk2/even_in_a_religious_country_like_india_rape_is/c5ew61h
oh hell, anything by /u/JasonMacker, /u/JayStrang, or /u/ManiacDan
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (51 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link
hey have an upvote. i can respect anyone who seeks out the discussion.
What I'm saying about rape might make you uncomfortable, but it's no less true just because you don't like it.
i have to caution you to not start out assuming i'm, or anyone else, uncomfortable with the assertions, i simply find them to be inaccurate.
JasonMacker, JayStrang, and I are all willing to discuss things, we're not the ones throwing insults out.
to be fair, JayStrang and JasonMacker both started hurling insults pretty quickly.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (47 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 7 points8 points9 points 14 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
how is calling us rape supporters part of a healthy discussion?
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
here's a guy victim-blaming directly You are partly responsible, in the same way I would be responsible for my house being broken into if I left the door unlocked on vacation. I'm not going to (and I'll bitch at anyone who does) tell you that it was your fault - that's a huge dick move, just like saying "Dude, you left your door unlocked, you deserved to have your shit taken" would be - but you didn't take all reasonable precautions. It is comforting to see that an increasing number of people are willing to admit that it shouldn't be linked to gender.
here's a guy victim-blaming directly
You are partly responsible, in the same way I would be responsible for my house being broken into if I left the door unlocked on vacation. I'm not going to (and I'll bitch at anyone who does) tell you that it was your fault - that's a huge dick move, just like saying "Dude, you left your door unlocked, you deserved to have your shit taken" would be - but you didn't take all reasonable precautions. It is comforting to see that an increasing number of people are willing to admit that it shouldn't be linked to gender.
I think saying "victim-blaming directly" is overly harsh and an example of overly generalization on your part. Recognizing that we all have a role to play -- that is partial responsibility -- is not "victim-blaming especially when the person says in the same comment, "I'm not going to tell you that it was your fault..."
Don't you recognize there are healthy precautions to take in the world and you should learn from your actions that may have increased your odds of being a target? Don't you also recognize it is not healthy to perceive yourself as a total victim and instead, become a survivor? To take steps towards self-empowerment and take back what people took from you is healthy. You saying the person who posted this comment is a "victim-blamer" is part of the huge problem of our culture that looks at these issues as black and white.
Seriously, this is coming from a retired therapist. You have to empower people to become survivors and that does mean recognizing you can play a role, however small. In no way is this "victim-blaming" this is choosing NOT TO BE A VICTIM of the past event and choosing to empower yourself with your actions that you do have control over.
This guy claims the word rape has been redefined so drastically that it's considered rape to deliver a baby improperly considering what rape means now days a unwanted advance can be considered rape. Rape is so watered down it doesn't mean shit today. they actually consider if the patent "felt" like she was touched to much during childbirth by the doctor it is considered rape.
This guy claims the word rape has been redefined so drastically that it's considered rape to deliver a baby improperly
considering what rape means now days a unwanted advance can be considered rape. Rape is so watered down it doesn't mean shit today. they actually consider if the patent "felt" like she was touched to much during childbirth by the doctor it is considered rape.
There is truth is this statement. For example in rape studies you will often see the term "Coercion" where it is operantly defined as "verbal pressure." Sorry, but this is redefining terms and watering down the meaning that many studies do to hyper inflate their numbers to get greater "social responses" (e.g., media outrage) and gain further support for the issue both socially and fiscally.
Studies used to report participants reactions to being classified as "raped" and stopped. Some studies had previously shown as high as a 75% rejection of participants agreeing with being classified as "raped." With many of the participants still actively having a sexual relationship with the now alleged "rapist." Sorry, but this is a very empirical evidence that the term "rape" has been watered down in academia.
co·er·cion [koh-ur-shuhn]
noun
the act of coercing; use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance.
force or the power to use force in gaining compliance, as by a government or police force.
Sorry, but "verbal pressure" is WEAK and makes any salesperson a "rapist" then.
TL;DR you don't like the watering down, then start demanding the field of Criminology do rape studies and not Psychology. Otherwise you are watering down the terminology of Rape to a state of emotion rather than a reasonable prosecutable crime.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
You're a therapist and you don't believe coercion can be used to rape someone? So if a police officer says he'll arrest you unless you suck his dick, that's not rape? What about blackmail? Not rape?
I did not say that at all. You honestly believe "verbal pressure" equals coercion?
In regards to the rest of your post it is obvious you have no clue about research regarding rape. Please actually pick up a study and read it. Till then...
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]thrway_1000 -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/birth-rape-why-is-this-happening-in-our-hospitals-2459486.html
[–]thrway_1000 -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
True, I'll agree. But, I don't think that it victim-blaming to say that it's possible that the term rape is loosing it's purpose when people like this apply it to things clearly not rape.
[–]Hach8 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Calling people who disagree with you a "rape supporter" isn't the best way to demonstrate that you're down for a rational discussion or reasonable debate.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
we're not the ones throwing insults
Followed by:
Confronting rape-supporters
It would seem that you are, in fact, the one throwing out insults.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (25 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link
Which post has been supporting rapes here? As far as I have seen, no one here (aside from trolls, which every subreddit has) supports rape. Rape is a terrible crime. The issue is that people assume it only happens to women, which is not true. It happens to males as well, and this is completely and totally ignored by the general population. Also, comments like "Teach your sons better" imply that guys need to be taught to not molest people... I feel like that's slightly condescending, don't you? Also, tell me:
not saying "this is victim blaming."
In this thread, where has anyone blamed the victim?
Edit: It appears, from your post above, that you were talking about people in another thread entirely. It originally appeared that you were talking about people in this sub, which is what I was responding to. Never mind, ignore this post and the other one.
Edit 2: I generally don't downvote people, so I appreciate the assumption that it must have been me that downvoted.
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
It could be true in India though.
From an Indian, no this is not true at all. Not even remotely so.
Given the research, which shows that 5+% of men will admit to forcible sexual intercourse as long as you don't call it "rape," no I don't.
5%? That is ridiculously high... got a citation on that one?
[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheWanderingJew 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
we're not the ones throwing insults out
I love tossing insults out, and do it all the time. What amazes me is how people like you do it without even realizing it. I mean serioulsy, how can you possibly not get what the tone, your phrasing, etc, in this post imply? I'm a rude, often pretty hateful, and irrational arguing person. But at least I KNOW I'm an argumentative asshole.
[–]ManiacDan 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm not going to argue about the definition of insult. I didn't intend to insult anyone and it wasn't even directed at anyone in this thread anyway
[–]HolyCounsel -4 points-3 points-2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
From JasonMacker:
When Smokey the Bear says "Only you can prevent forest fires", he's not calling me an arsonist.
Smokey the Bear never identified you as a man.
If black people were committing 90% of all crimes, you might have a point. But the fact is, over 90% of rapists are men.
Gold diggers are almost 100% female, and almost all false accusations of rape come from women. Ergo, any comments accusing all woman and telling them that they are responsible for fixing it is completely justified. Yes?
After 9/11, there was a huge backlash that labelled all Muslims as potential terrorists. The media fought back by showing that the huge proportion of Muslims are peaceful and law abiding. This sensibility is lost when the issue is men and rape.
From JayStrang:
I'm against the brain-damaged little trolls who identifiy as "Men's Rights Activists"
OK, we're done.
ManiacDan at least has the character to come here and discuss the issue.
[–]hardwarequestions -3 points-2 points-1 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i agree. ManiacDan has my respect.
[–]gwolf100[S] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Little update: Got a special mention on SRS for my comment underneath this post on /r/atheism
[–]Gareth321 -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The submission.
[–]gwolf100[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks! I dunno how to properly X-Post yet :(
[+][deleted] 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gwolf100[S] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I take it as a point of pride that they mentioned me :)
[–]AgentVanillaGorilla 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Are you guys kidding me? This is about a terrible part of India. In India and the Middle East, there are a lot more problems like this than in America or Europe. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this.
[–]gwolf100[S] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The issue though is that they run a pretty similar campaign here in N.A.
[–]AgentVanillaGorilla 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
True, and it does instill fear of men. But it really is a problem in some parts of the world. Women are thought of and treated like objects. In the US, I focus on men's rights. For the world as a whole, I focus on overall equality.
[–]gwolf100[S] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which is the way it should be, but instead we have feminists complaining that the models on TV are too thin, rather than y'know discussing the fact that actual "rape culture" exists in places like south africa where something like 3 out of 4 women will be raped (as in forced against her will to have sex kind of rape). But y'know body image and an imaginary wage gap are more important.
[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just watched a thing on Nat Geo about teen sex. There was a segment about "purity balls" in the south through Evangelical churches. It was the young girls pledging their purity (virginity) to their fathers and God. At first I thought, "Well innit that cute...BUT IT'S WRONG!!!" I thought fair is fair, equal is equal, why make only the girls promise to remain abstinent and let the boys go willy nilly? Teach purity/responsibility to BOTH genders. Our society teaches "Don't get raped" when it should teach "Don't rape".
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not interested in going out at all.
SRS is supportive of all rape survivors.
When it's a convenient PR tactic where they can't say "shitthatdidnthappen.txt" to men.
[–]persianpimp -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Was going to post this! :)
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What about cougars, gay rapists and large scary bigfoot-people?
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[+][deleted] (54 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]853211 107 points108 points109 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 60 points61 points62 points (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue 36 points37 points38 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 29 points30 points31 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]PandaSandwich 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wordshark 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]SchrodingersRapist 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iongantas 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dranosh 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yillpv 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lohengren 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jakome 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]853211 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rusty_chipmunk 30 points31 points32 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Colcut 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PacoBedejo 4 points5 points6 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]altmehere 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]17-40 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xXBlUnTsM0KA420Xx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jlennon4422 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PacoBedejo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mordicaii 10 points11 points12 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue 23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cscx 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RadioFreeReddit 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gingerkid1234 36 points37 points38 points (33 children) | Copy Link
[–]vote4petro 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]a_weed_wizard 49 points50 points51 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheWanderingJew 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CandidWalrus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Seacrest_Hulk 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]down_vote_that 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]a_weed_wizard 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheWanderingJew 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheWanderingJew 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cscx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]loose-dendrite 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dregle 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FOADSASCUM 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]buylocal745 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gingerkid1234 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]radeky 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TjPshine -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hach8 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Legolihkan 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Phuzzums 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk 45 points46 points47 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yillpv 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]esskaay 3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]sorry4partying 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Klaue 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]sorry4partying 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Klaue 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InfallibleBiship -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]garthunk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]lalit008 8 points9 points10 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stophon 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yillpv 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Roddy0608 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Roddy0608 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Minkatte 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]papasuckle55 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Irrel_M 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]duglock 10 points11 points12 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]topherotica 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]loose-dendrite 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]topherotica 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dranosh 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thefieldsofdawn 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tjbdef 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]chucky2000 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Roddy0608 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Everseer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]ttnorac 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yillpv 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nefilim777 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XxDailyDreamxX 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions -2 points-1 points0 points (54 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (51 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]hardwarequestions 1 point2 points3 points (48 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (47 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]hardwarequestions 7 points8 points9 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (16 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (8 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]thrway_1000 -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]thrway_1000 -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Hach8 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (25 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (23 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (21 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]TheWanderingJew 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ManiacDan 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HolyCounsel -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hardwarequestions -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gwolf100[S] 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gareth321 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gwolf100[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]gwolf100[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AgentVanillaGorilla 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]gwolf100[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AgentVanillaGorilla 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gwolf100[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]persianpimp -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link