659,121 posts

I think I broke her...

by tsudonimh | August 06, 2014 | TheRedPill

1112 upvotes

Reddit View

So the wife and I were out to dinner last night with some interstate friends of hers from school. Both girls were spinsters, one by choice after swearing off marriage early, the other the typical cc - riding empowered girl.

After a few reds, the conversation swung around to how men are clearly intimidated by sexually experienced women. No points for guessing which of the three women at the table held that view. My snort of amusement attracted her ire like a laser.

She railed at me for a while, making no particular point beyond the fact that no guy she dates wants to marry her and that was proof that I was wrong.

I just flat out stated that a woman who had sex with a thousand guys a year was not marriage material, but a woman who had sex with one guy a thousand times a year would have men lining up to marry her.

Cue goldfish face.

The guys at the next table offered to buy me a beer.

The remainder of dinner was not really enjoyable, because of the rampant misogyny at the table, I was informed. I don't know, I enjoyed it. The tuna tartare was to die for.


Post Information
Title I think I broke her...
Author tsudonimh
Upvotes 1112
Comments 251
Date 06 August 2014 10:55 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/19017
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2ctyyl/i_think_i_broke_her/
Similar Posts

TRP terms found in post
Click to open them on Dictionary

Comments

[–][deleted] 209 points209 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]LostontheAverage15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

That made so much sense and was so to the point

[–]grayman1214 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'm a little less concerned than some around here with a woman who's had a lot sex. With that said, this comment hit the nail right on the head. Saved.

[–]awesomesalsa-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

There are studies which show you should be more concerned

[–]grayman120 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Would love to see them, send em my way.

[–]HonestyReigns-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Delightfully honest, even a little eye opening for me

[–]GeneralCal184 points185 points  (15 children) | Copy

She can't spot a pattern that she keeps getting dumped? I'm glad she's so sure of her strategy...

[–]chzblck135 points136 points  (9 children) | Copy

Exactly. When women say "All men are_______" they usually mean "all the men I seem to attract are _______"

If you have Facebook I'm sure you know that girl who complains about men all the time, but every few weeks it's a new profile pic and "the best guy ever" statuses.

[–]GraphicSeniorNudity74 points75 points  (5 children) | Copy

the ugliest girl I know is a single mom who complains about male privilege and unrealistic beauty standards.

[–]frasfralla21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is how i spot the feminist in any new setting i get to. Like my university class.

Pick the two ugliest girls with the ugliest clothes.

It never fails.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (3 children) | Copy

I...I really hope you never have a relevant username.

[–]MustangGuy9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm sure there's a sub for that.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Well, there go my nipples again.

[–]AEther_Flux1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Captain Murphy! Get back on your radio station!

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

"All the men I'm attracted to are _______"

Just wanted to make an adjustment there.

[–]GeneralCal7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I remember a couple... They've been blocked for so long I don't know what their deal is any more.

[–]malmn0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That describes my ex to a tee.

[–]theozoph41 points42 points  (2 children) | Copy

Man : I can't get a girl, what am I doing wrong?

Woman : I can't get a man, what is wrong with them?

[–]GeneralCal5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ah, yes, the plot of every horrible sitcom, romantic comedy, and HBO series starring a horse since 1983.

[–]Sturmgeist7812 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Best summary of how the male/female dynamic works.

[–][deleted] 485 points486 points  (157 children) | Copy

Haha. That sounds like an old Chinese proverb..."Woman who love a thousand men prevents suitable harvest, woman who love a man a thousand times is blessed under heaven" - Confucius (aka: tsudonimh)

[–]RedSunBlue68 points69 points  (36 children) | Copy

FYI, roosh just tweeted this comment:

https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/497182768242360320

[–]elchoma9062 points63 points  (26 children) | Copy

Not that it matters a whole lot but that mofo needs to start giving credit to people. I stopped reading him very long ago he always does shit like that. He always came off like a try hard to me to be honest.

[–]26ounce21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

r/redpill continues to grow in influence. Even heartiste references material from here.

[–]curveball2126 points27 points  (16 children) | Copy

We might be taking it a little too far if we insist on crediting people who are quoting someone else to begin with.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor40 points41 points  (6 children) | Copy

The problem is Roosh attributed this quote to Confucius and I think NA just made it up. Confucius said no such thing. Right?

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

You are correct.

[–]1Zanford4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Genius. "Watermarking" your quote via a false attribution to Confucius (or just changing the wording up) - then you know anyone who quotes it verbatim got it from you.

Roosh was too lazy to do a single Google search to see if it was really Confucius. If he were smart he would have done that, and-or waited to tweet so it was less obviously from here.

[–]curveball213 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well, if that is the case then for sure what Roosh did was absolutely wrong. You can't just steal people's ideas and then present them in a way that leads others to believe they are your own. It says nothing positive about your character if you do that. I don't know what the truth is. Everything I know about Confucius I learned from a book report in 3rd grade, fortune cookies and reruns of Kung Fu.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

Who the fuck cares? It is funny so he twat it. Obviously it is made up.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

I care cuz I was considering taking a look at Confucianism until I learned it was not really what the master said. I could have wasted minutes on Wikepedia.

[–]finitely_eclectic4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well, he IS a twat. So there's that.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well he didn't credit either of us...Soooo...

[–]Psycho_Delic4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah, the guy has always seemed like a RP version of an SJW. Which is as shameful as being an SJW to begin with.

[–]awesomesalsa1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep. Its not a coincidence Roosh rhymes with douche. I dont care much for Roissy either. Rollo, however, is smart and seems like a truly nice guy

[–]the_d3vils_advocate-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy

Wait so was that actually a confuscius (?) Quote?

[–]tsudonimh[S] 13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

I seriously doubt it.

[–]dandeezy26 points27 points  (1 child) | Copy

I seriously doubt it. -- Confucius

[–]Pulcifer0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

It's pretty difficult to cite your sources in 140 characters or less I would guess. That or it's the internet so we should all just assume everything is stolen.

[–]itwasninjas10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

A lot of people don't know that I was the original inventor of the word "plagiarism".

[–]1Ill_mumble_that2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

No hard to say I came from TRP at least. -redpill if theres enough room for it.

[–]omnipedia2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not really, he could post the full URL- Twitter shortens it well

[–]suRubix-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Didn't he give Confucius credit?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy

Who is Roosh and why should I care? (Honest question)

[–]Facha6697 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy

rooshv.com Is how i initially found everything around 2009 on these topics and eventually end up here

[–]1Ill_mumble_that15 points16 points  (4 children) | Copy

When you discovered this community is 100x better than most the shit roosh writes. He has some good articles, but RoK is a fucking joke and now he's stealing content from TRP without attributing it to TRP.

[–]nsummy7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy

TRP doesn't have content good enough to steal. This story is a prime example. While its a good lesson, it probably never even happened. How many times have you been in a heated discussion at a restaurant table and a group of guys yells over and says, let me buy you a beer! Never happened.

[–]dvrzero4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

I've had heated discussions about how many syllables the letter "W" has and gotten free beer. You just have to be quite funny.

[–]nsummy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

A stranger bought you a beer because of that? Either way, giant difference between a fun, stupid argument in the bar, and a heated discussion at the dinner table over wine about sleeping with men.

[–]dvrzero1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"I'll be damned if they're not the same thing" he said, after giving me the beer.

Etched in my mind, it is.

[–][deleted] 123 points124 points  (101 children) | Copy

The thing is that it's so easy for women to get laid. If they have a guilt-free reaction to casual sex then it's a complete turn off for men (relationship wise). It represents a lack of discipline that most likely is not going to disappear just because she is in a relationship. She's still hot for other men and they're the ones who hit on her. So her staying faithful means she has to constantly reject men she would normally fuck. If she doesn't have practice rejecting men she finds attractive then she won't be able to do it as easily as other women.

Women have greater sexual power and when they exercise it, men lose relationship interests. Just because contraceptives erase the biological consequences does not mean we don't view them in a similar light as the women who aren't sure who the father of their kids are. They're the same. Only difference is contraception.

Look at all the highest status men. They get so much pussy that almost all of them can't help but cheat. Decent looking women can get laid almost as easily as these men. The difference is that, even with infidelity, high status men are still way more desirable than other men. A slut on the other hand, has no positive value as a trade-off for her becoming a slut. So her being a slut can only a bad thing.

[–][deleted] 92 points93 points  (85 children) | Copy

As a woman, I 100% agree with this. If you slut it up, you devalue the coin you were blessed with. I like to think of it as inflation. If a woman's coin is sex, and she's throwing out a lot to tons of different people, then she has inflated her coin/ devalued it by a shitload. As opposed to taking that coin and banking it with one man(bank?) where it will only experience appreciation. (Higher coin with the bank will enjoy higher interest rates. Please fuck your spouse accordingly, terms and conditions may apply)

[–]IAmTheIlluminatiAMA32 points33 points  (54 children) | Copy

Do you find that your female friends realize it is easier for a woman to get laid? I have never got a woman to admit that.

[–]BoyMeetsHarem47 points48 points  (1 child) | Copy

Because in their mind, "getting laid" = "getting laid by someone I'm extremely attracted to who is likely out of my league"

[–]awesomesalsa8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well to be fair, most guys can get laid easily if they lower their standards enough

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]1Zanford10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Bragplainig.

They willl never admit in a way that shows sympathy for the work guys have to put in.

[–]ben0wn4g31 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I find a lot of girls admit it actually.

[–]Akordia1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Some do realise it, others do not.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

"if pussy was a stock, it would be plummeting, cause you're flooding the market with it!" - Dave Chappelle

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

1) be attractive

2) don't be unattractive

That's about it in my experience. Or if you are hideous, be smart and in shape. That slutcoin doesn't have a lot of standards.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

The inverse is of course true for men. A man that spends his coin (in the sense of time and validation) with many women has devalued it. This is why 'nice guys' get friendzoned and made into orbiters.

Making your time and resources scarce only increases their value.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy

If you go look in my submitted you'll find some definitive photographic proof in my step by step procedure to beat a hair follicle test for marijuana!

Edit: fucking mobile. Anyways, maybe as a woman is frowned on when you're disagreeing with your I enlightened views. Maybe it's okay if you've swallowed that great red pill. I don't really know how it works. I mean, i hadn't even seen the matrix until like a month ago.

[–]1mcdehuevo25 points26 points  (5 children) | Copy

I don't see a problem with "as a woman" if you're not trying to use it as a trump card or going off on some rant about your feelings being hurt by someone's failure to pay proper homage to the gods of political correctness. Doesn't appear you were doing either of those things, so cheers.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

Yeah, I was just kind of using it to state where my viewpoint was coming from (slightly unique in this sub I guess).

Thanks!

[–]itsmehobnob-4 points-3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Truth is truth regardless of view point.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Facts are, truth much less so.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I always thought we needed more nuance to the 'as a woman' semi-rule. Lots of times it is relevant as with M'Ladies post. In fact, wouldn't it be easier to have icons identifying the posters gender and perspective? The little Red Numbers is an awesome quality check and similarly, having RPW or RPM or BPidiot etc is useful information (and eliminates the usually annoying...'as a woman.' Bonus points if we can filter responses. Sometimes I just don't want to hear what the women feeeeel.

[–]ArrantPariah3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

Wow, a woman with an economist's perspective. You must have enjoyed that "Economics of Sex" video that came out a couple of months ago. http://sexualobjectification.blogspot.com/2014/07/feminists-versus-economics.html

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy

I haven't actually seen it before. Thanks for linking it! I'm at work right now, but I'll take a look later! Thanks! But yeah. I mean, if lots of guys are trying to bone me, then I should take advantage of the selection to choose the cream of the crop while I can right? Doing otherwise is just foolish for long term health and happiness. I don't have any fear of missing out on one night stands or that shit. It is more sexually and financially profitable for me to invest in the best "deal" I can get. Because the mindset of almost everyone in everything is getting the best deal they can for their wants and needs, based on their value of the product. (I work in car sales. It might show a bit.)

[–]ArrantPariah-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

You're definitely a smart one.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

Okay read over the article and the feminist disagreements. She must be mad because she has a high number. No one gets that vitriolic without taking personal offense. Also, they keep going back to the birth control thing where it doesn't matter because we're not getting knocked up as much. BITCH, HERPES DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE PILL OR CONDOMS. STDs can be passed in other ways, and it is foolish of any woman to think she can sleep with 50+ guys and come out unscathed. My friend who is upwards of 100+ guys? Yeah, HPV. She didn't get tested for over 4 years. Who knows when the fuck that came up and who she gave it to. So nasty.

edit: the real reason, I think, though, that feminists get really mad about this shit and cry that "why doesn't my personality count? our supply isn't all the same" is because after you've given so much away and oxytocin bonded with that many guys, and opened yourself up to that many diseases, and taken birth control for that long, and gotten to the age where you start wondering if its time to settle down because the biological clock is a-tickin', your value has decreased to something similar to other women in your predicament. It's happening to more and more women. I think you guys call it a wall. Women hit the wall because they didn't plan ahead. Also, all those walks of shame and guys they fucked, is that what you want your daughters to do? Are you proud of the train of dicks you've rode? If you can honestly look in the mirror and say that's what you want for your little girl, then I think she should be taken away from you. Because it's irresponsible and doesn't teach your children to respect themselves enough to share their intimacy with someone who cares. Because it's not just sex. Ever. You can have sex with whomever you want, but practice some discernment.

[–]theredpillager5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lol, you've got BP SJWs downvoting this fantastically accurate comment. Have my upvote to restore a little balance.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Right but as a guy who has had several FWB, at what point is it okay to enjoy casual sex for a chick?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't know, man. The risk is up to you. Just remember that condoms won't save you from genital herpes. When you fuck a woman you are vicariously fucking everyone she has fucked (in the terms of STD-openness). If a woman is casual sexing with you, she maybe casual sexing someone else. Or a few other people. You can't police her actions, but it's opening yourself up to a lot of potential issues.

That being said, if reward outweighs risk to you, and these aren't women you are trying to marry and make the mother of your own daughters and sons, then please continue. You can only control yourself and if these women want to be shit gatekeepers to sex, then you can enjoy the pilferage from their lax watch. Doesn't mean you have to commit or anything back.

I just don't think women should continue having casual sex beyond a certain point. and that "wall" is actually way sooner than women think it is. I can count all the dicks I've touched on one hand. You shouldn't have to count fingers and toes when counting out your sexual partners. That's just gross.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I certainly agree for the most part. I think there's certainly some nuances and/or exceptions but the gist of what you wrote is correct. May post a followup later when I'm not at work.

[–]alvydavos-29 points-28 points  (3 children) | Copy

As a person, I think you and everyone else in this subreddit may be fucking stupid. If a woman's coin is sex-- it's not. By saying this fucking nonsense, you're devaluing yourself and your gender. You're reducing your gender to its ability to have sex, despite men having that same ability and being spared the gross marginalization.

If OP weren't such a woman hating faggot, he'd realize that only idiots judge other people by how much sexual partners they've had. The number implies nothing. Nothing at all. If you could find more than one sexual partner, maybe you'd have the worldly experience to learn such things? I don't know.

Fuck all of you.

[–]MOldMuckyTerrahawk[M] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Okay see ya.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

You sound like someone who has a lot of slutcoin. I'm sorry.

Now, just to elaborate on why women get this rap and men don't, is because genetically/biologically speaking women keep men from having sex. They are the gatekeepers. They can allow these horny dudes to earn that sweet release.

But men are the gatekeepers of commitment. It's the male biological imperative to spread thy seed. Women release a fuckton of oxytocin after sex to emotionally and chemically bond them to their sex partner, making it difficult to let them go. This is of course because if the woman becomes pregnant then she is bonded to the would be protector of her offspring. This is biological fact that this occurs. Fucking a ton of dudes is going against the sexual biology of a woman.

This has a negative connotation for a number of reasons. The primary one being when woman fuck a lot of guys, the issue of inheritance and property rights if she does get pregnant is a huge, legal headache. This is why marriage was created in antiquity (Greco-Roman times). The secondary one, which I think resonates more, is that when a woman fucks a lot of guys, she isn't showing respect for herself. I say this because why is a woman going against her own nature and Chemical balances to change partners so casually? There are always underlying issues, from alcoholism to being lonely(maybe you can't find a partner because you keep fucking strangers?), from depression to daddy issues.

Yeah, we are sentient beings so we don't have to give in to the biological imperatives of our species. But that does not mean they for affect us. Humans are animals, too. We are not immune from the consequences of our geneology.

I'm also Catholic and regularly engage in premarital sex. This isn't coming from some repressed place. That being said, I can count my sexual partners on one hand and I prefer to keep it that way. The more people you sleep with, the higher your chances of STD are no matter what gender you are. That's a fact.

I have family members with AIDS and opening myself up to any kind of risk like this is so imprudent. You're kind of stupid for saying all that.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (9 children) | Copy

If they have a guilt-free reaction to casual sex then it's a complete turn off for men (relationship wise).

I'm going to preface this by disclaiming that I'm new here, but I've noticed that there are women who are very talented at putting on the "innocent" act until they're in the bedroom.

For instance, one of my first girlfriends back in my teens was a virgin. Then she had a "talk" with me to explain that she got herpes from a towel in the girl's locker room. Riiiight. Naturally I don't buy it, but her hamster, while young, was still spinning full speed.

I'm not going to lie though -- the whole innocent thing until behind closed doors -- it's pretty hot.

[–]platochronic1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy

Correct if I'm wrong, people can be born with the disease, so just because someone has it doesn't mean they've had sex or that they've ever been sexually active.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's medically possible, but if that's the case you don't hear a wheel turning about how it was from some gym towel.

edit: or should I say "Jim" towel.

[–]platochronic-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah, I understand that's a not a great excuse, but I'm just saying just because someone has an std doesn't mean that someone was sexually active. If she was smart, she could say she was born with it. I know people who were born with it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

My brother was born with it on his eyes!

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

half brother, different mom. And yeah, I know lol. My dad is the one that has it and gave it to the different mothers (7 kids, 4 moms). My dad has had a lot of women

[–]1sailorJery1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

it's only bad news if he's interested

[–]1Zanford2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Great analogy. A slut is like the downsides of a super-status male (rampant cheating, or always close to it) with none of the upsides (the high-status traits tha tmake him super-attractive...it's not like the average slut is a 10). Now factor in that men hate sexual infidelity worse than women...

[–]tsudonimh[S] 50 points51 points  (5 children) | Copy

I just shot coffee through my nose. Thanks for that!

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (3 children) | Copy

I knew that someone would post a comment about shooting some form of liquid out of their nose...it was only a matter of time...glad to have been of service in the involuntary expulsion of fluids from your orifices.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hey, I shot air out of my nose as well. Just a little excess fluid in my body I needed to get rid of, is all.

Yeah, I know that isn't original either

But that for the proverb haha. This is a good post.

[–]otivito8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

A lock opened by many keys is a bad lock. A key that opens many locks, is a master key.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think this should have bad changed to worthless and good changed to valuable.

[–]scarfox1-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

Were you trying to write pseudonym? lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

No. That is the username of the author of this article...but I'm sure that was his clever way of attempting make his account name resemble that term.

[–]dissinmouse-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

reminds me a lot of "A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.”

[–]optimates33 points34 points  (17 children) | Copy

I wish I could have seen the face. Nice comeback!

[–][deleted] 117 points118 points  (4 children) | Copy

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan29 points30 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–]VegasHostTre3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Now you made ME shoot liquid from my nose!

[–]tsudonimh[S] 63 points64 points  (6 children) | Copy

I have never in my life managed to come up with a witty line on cue. It was only her long winded ranting that allowed me the time to formulate that line.

I've posted here before that I'm gold - medal class in the shit - I - wished-I-thought - of Olympics.

[–]optimates20 points21 points  (1 child) | Copy

Hindsight is the first step. You should remember some comebacks and proverbs. They'll be useful as witty comebacks when the time comes.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]HahahahaWaitWhat21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

Staircase wit is the usual translation.

[–]Psycho_Delic2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Alright man, check this out.

Bring it up anyway. As a person, equally afflicted with hindsight. I've found people are more than eager to bring a subject up again. Then, you have a new nugget to inject in to the conversation.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Thank the TRP for knowing exactly what she was going to say so you could check the fuck out 3 words into her rant, and start formulating a response.

[–]2elysius7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy

Probably looked a lot like the face this woman does around 3:14 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM&t=2m55s (video starts a little earlier for context)

[–]Fulgidus0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

And now I'm laughing my ass off like a mad person in the middle of a coffee shop...

You made my day bro!

[–]Idle_Redditing30 points31 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm not intimidated, I'm just not going to commit.

I'm also not afraid of commitment in general, though I am rightfully afraid of commitment to one of these "strong, liberated, sexually experienced women."

[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August90 points91 points  (3 children) | Copy

Across borders, across oceans, I have witnessed carousel-riders spew out that exact same hamsterisation: "men are intimidated by experienced women". They all had that faintly quizzical face seeking validation from their captive audience for their poor life choices. That ancient lizard part of their brain damn well knows they fucked up.

I'm borrowing your "thousand" cock line - brilliant.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

If she's taken more yards of dick than an NFL quarterback has rushing yards... she might be a slut.

Imagine it in the tone of Jeff Foxworthy doing his 'you might be a redneck routine' for full lulz effect.

[–]UncleDisgusting32 points33 points  (0 children) | Copy

"She's seen more helmets than Hitler" - heard from a Scottish dude years ago

[–]McMurphyCrazy16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Jeff had a great bit that stuck with me since I was a kid.

"Guys, if a woman says to you "I think we should start seeing other people," trust me, she has already cut a pony from the herd, and if she ain't ridin' him yet, she has pulled the saddle out of the barn."

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

May also include the 1000 cock stare.

I'm picturing a self righteous indignant puss mixed with a sour faced "someone just dropped ass" look.

[–]Good2Go52801 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

clap clap clap clap clap clap clap

[–]Isaiah4verse141 points42 points  (6 children) | Copy

Who'd pay mortgage on a Porto-potty?

don't delete me reddit bot

[–]deadcow525 points26 points  (5 children) | Copy

don't delete me reddit bot

Shit like this is why that bot is an inherently dumb idea.

If you can say it with fewer words, why use more to say the same?

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]deadcow58 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

Yeah, you know, it wouldn't be too hard to write a bot that just deleted answers with the word "this", or one-word answers.

[–]Isaiah4verse13 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Agreed.

Don't delete me Reddit bot.

:-D

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think it also leaves you alone if you have delta points or endorsed status as I haven't had any of my posts gobbled by the bot.

[–]tallwheel31 points32 points  (0 children) | Copy

She knows the real reason men won't commit to her. She's just hamstering a way to shift the blame to men. What she really should have said is that men clearly are not attracted to sexually experienced women as long-term partners. She needs to accept reality.

[–]TomHicks19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

The guys at the next table offered to buy me a beer.

Honestly, this sounds like that /r/thathappened joke (and then he gave me $100 under the sink).

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Robdogx900112 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Sometimes its fun to get real when you have nothing to loose.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

You have nothing [that matters] to lose and maybe they learn something from it. Seems win-win to me

[–]whitey_male5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Also no one likes a cc rider who takes herself so seriously and acts like cc riding = working for the UN or doing some really important job.

Maybe if they had a bit of humility they might fare a bit better.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Sniff_NopeThasDoody7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ah nothing like the smell of raw tuna, surrounded by the smell of raw tuna

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

The guys at the next table offered to buy me a beer.

That sounds a lot like an "It was my privilege" ending.

[–]jadedspade43 points44 points  (0 children) | Copy

REKT

Seriously I would have bought you a beer too bro.

[–]blfstyk13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

That is right on. You can reverse it though.

This may be merely legend, but when Rembrandt, who was supposedly devoted to his wife, was asked, "Rembrandt, with your fame, you could have any woman you want, why don't you have many mistresses?", replied: "If you sleep with many women, you have none, if you sleep with only one, you have all the women in the world."

Ah, to find that one woman who is all the women in the world.

[–]blazingcopper4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Back then it wasn't hard to find

[–]AmazonExplorer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

ha, never knew much about Rembrandt aside from his paintings.

[–]slfnflctd1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

'That one woman' has likely been more myth than reality for the majority of men through most of human history (at least post-agriculture, anyhow). One partner, if not each, will always be more likely to betray the other than either fully realize in certain circumstances, for reasons that are in large part subconscious. I do think there's a spectrum, though, and some people have had better luck. Problem is, you just can't guarantee that kind of result (although you can bump your odds).

In any case, I have a theory that compromise and commitment both seem to come more naturally for some people with age (perhaps as they realize their time is short?). This is why I try to maintain more regular contact with people I consider to be of a higher caliber, male and female-- there will be fewer of us with long-standing ties as time goes on, and those ties will mean more. I guess what I'm saying is that your chances of finding a unicorn are absurdly low, but if you filter well you can have a fair shot at finding a woman who will grow into a stellar partner eventually.

[–]sir_wankalot_here7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I thought this post was a kinky sex post. I am disappointed. Oh well.

[–]El_Shakiel2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Man, it is stories like this that make me love r/TRP and make me come back every day. Thanks for the tale !

[–]ColdEiric7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

You should have told it to young girls. Young girls who aren't beyond the point of no return.

[–]GrilledCheezus712 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Tuna tartare is fucking delicious dude. Fine choices all around.

[–]HeinousFu_kery16 points17 points  (10 children) | Copy

Edit: OP meant misogyny.

One of my rules of women says: "If she says she's been dumped a lot (or left with no promised phone call), you're about to find out why..."

[–]postuk45 points46 points  (9 children) | Copy

No, he means misogyny. Read it again:

The remainder of dinner was not really enjoyable, because of the rampant misogyny at the table, I was informed.

They told him that they weren't enjoying themselves because of the [his?] "misogyny".

I don't know, I enjoyed it.

He enjoyed the "misogyny".

The tuna tartare was to die for.

The food wasn't so bad either!

Edit: down voted for making the OP even clearer?! Cunt!

[–]Rugnardl15 points16 points  (7 children) | Copy

Up voted for the final, obligatory "Cunt!"

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy

I upvote most comments with the word "cunt" in it.

[–]tsudonimh[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Damn it, the bot deleted my first response...

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I upvote anything with George Carlin's 7 words. /s

Cunt is pretty much the only word that's retained it's effectiveness as an insult/swear word. Lets try not to overuse it like we did with fuck, motherfucker and cocksucker.

[–]2Overkillengine1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thus the irony of people using anti-censorship to indulge. When you overuse something you end up diluting it.

[–]postuk4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lol. I returned to make a brief edit (added a '?') within seconds of posting, to see it has been down voted to zero. It angered me more than meaningless Internet points should.

[–]itwasninjas1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

yeah, but at least righteous anger is somewhat enjoyable

[–]HeinousFu_kery1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You are correct, sir. Edited.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hahahaha the fact those guys were willing to buy you a beer is indicative of one thing: a lot of guys feel the same way about women and their bullshit but are too afraid to speak up. Criticising women or saying anything negative has become such a taboo it's a joke. Even in their (a woman's) eyes laying over and taking their shit wins you no respect.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (15 children) | Copy

A lock that can be opened by any key is not a very good lock, but the key that can open any lock is a master key.

[–]lightfire40926 points27 points  (8 children) | Copy

I always chucked how the feminists are always like "Oh not the lock and key analogy again!" while they never manage to refute the point it makes.

[–]2elysius22 points23 points  (6 children) | Copy

I believe the default rebuttal is that women are not objects blah blah blah. Same thing with the rape issue: you can't put yourself in harm's way and expect nothing bad to happen*, just like you wouldn't leave your car or house door unlocked and expect nothing bad to happen. BUT OUR BODIES ARE NOT CARS etc.

They know they can't refute the argument so they hamster it away.

  • Note that this is entirely different from the "blaming the victim" fantasy they drummed up.

[–]FA_in_PJ23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy

I've moved to an analogy about missionaries who get themselves killed. It happens. Civil war, disease, superstition/misinformation among the natives, lots of reasons. People doing good in the world get murdered.

There are two approaches one could take to this problem: (1) Start a "don't kill whitey" campaign targeted at third world denizens or (2) Make sure that potential starry-eyed do-gooders are informed about the dangers they are walking into. Which approach is more likely to save lives?

I've yet to hear a feminist retort to this argument. Any retort, let alone a good one. B/c what can they say?

Of course, I have the advantage of a personal anecdote, which always scores points with the bleeding hearts. My childhood preacher's whole family was wiped out on a mission to Africa. They never even got off the airplane.

So yeah, curious to learn if it still works without the tear-jerker. And the tear-jerker element is total BS, I was too young to know those people; my parents passed the story on to me when I was older.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

Same thing with the rape issue: you can't put yourself in harm's way and expect nothing bad to happen*

Whenever women pull this victim blaming shit I say 'Ok... that's basically like saying some white dude with a megaphone going through harlem shouting 'here nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger' and acting surprised when he gets beat within an inch of his life and/or shot.

[–]ComteDeSaintGermain7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

...except that 'putting yourself in harm's way' can mean as little as 'being pretty and stepping outside after 9pm'....

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Our bodies are not cars

It's a physical vessel that has its kinks, requires maintenance, fuel, and allows my brain to travel.

I'm not sure if I just did an Oxford comma. Did I just do an Oxford comma?

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

You are not strengthening your argument by presenting it with different words (in an analogy).

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]brons1044 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

What man in his right mind wants to marry a woman who admits to having more men than a battleship? If you follow the logic on it, this woman wants a man to risk most of his possessions by committing himself solely her, a person who has shown that she can't commit herself to a single man. What a double-standard backed up by such a sense of self-entitlement.

[–]thisisnotatoaster3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women would look at a man who had thousands of women in the same fashion. "Someone who couldn't commit"

I grew up in a world where women weren't entitled to shit and they couldn't win no matter what they did, and now I am in one where it's almost the opposite sometimes. It's weird.

[–]MajorStyles1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Bravo, sir! I will buy you a beer if I ever meet you.

[–]usku1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nobody wants a shitty lock.

[–]1Zanford1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Haha I love the guys at hte next table. Hope you swapped info with them to make some new drinking/fishing/bowling/lifting buddies.

[–]Dr_Wally1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm late to this party, but I loved it.

[–]1rporion-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–]insane_crazy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The proverb comes to mind. "A key that opens a thousand locks is a master key, but a lock that opens to any key is not a lock" wonderful!

[–]FelixTheLeo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Well done! I don't think I could've handled that situation any better.

[–]HeadingRed0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Can't settle for just one cock- even for a little while and still wonders

"Why doesn't anyone want to marry me?"

Hmm so far you have shown you don't want to be loyal- why should I take a chance that this time it'll work.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Since when did repulsed turn into intimidated?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Your answer fits perfectly with her statement. Having multiple previous partners gives her more people to compare you to and would therefore be more intimidating than having a single previous partner.

[–]myepicdemise-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

I just flat out stated that a woman who had sex with a thousand guys a year was not marriage material, but a woman who had sex with one guy a thousand times a year would have men lining up to marry her.

Too bad she's too dumb to even understand this, which is simple math. For every guy she has sex with, it's 1 guy out of the line. This proportional relationship makes so much sense.

[–]thisisnotatoaster-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just because women are "empowered" to explore their sexuality now (actually in many places we still aren't, lest we want to be written off as the "whore" or be given the tramp stamp) doesn't mean it's a good idea to sleep with a thousand men and pull the misogyny card when someone calls us on our clearly stated lack of commitment. I'm all for folks turning the "walk of shame" into the "walk of pride" , but if I were like that which you just described, I would have to admit it doesn't mean I should expect men everywhere to adore me for my resolve while also expecting them to deem me the pillar of a serious relationship. But I guess I'm just logically consistent like that. ~shrug~

Tuna tar tar is delicious.

[–]Good2Go5280-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

I have a chick friend that's literally a model (looks likeMegan Fox). She fucks everything and it disgusts me.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter