CMV : Despite a women claiming to have "diverse taste" in men, it would always be positive for a man's sexlife to be taller, with a stronger jawline, a more symmetrical face and more dominant.

I see a lot of women here argue something to the effect that their tastes are varied and that there really is no "universal set of attractive features" on men. I think the confusing element to this is that women can look at the same man, and disagree.

Two women can look at a man that is objectively more attractive than them (e.g. he is pursued most by SMV8 women, and two SMV7 women are observing) and one of them can see that he's "not her type."

Women seem to take this to understand that "tastes are varied." But this isn't really true. All this woman is doing is projecting her pickiness\entitlement and or abundance, if you wanted to spin it, her lack of thirst. In the same way you can disparage a great painting as "not my type of art." Nothing about this person's opinion gives any credibility to the art being poor.

Now rather than getting bogged down arguing through her lens, we can look at this a much easier way.

If we were to take this man and make him taller, with a stronger jawline, more symmetrical face and more dominant, we should expect this man will always do better in terms of quantity and quality of sex partners.

Since this is obvious and true, we can reject the idea that women all have "unique preferences" and instead understand that perspective, subjectivity itself is a thing, but not that their preferences vary. If women did not have a particular set of preferences, then increasing these attributes wouldn't increase the mate pool for said man, but it does.

Just that subjectivity is an irrefutable part of the human experience. Why no product can ever completely own a market. But it would be ridiculous to claim that "preferences vary" when it comes to a luxury car when clearly there are universally desired traits. E.g. leather, powerful engine with a lot of torque, smooth ride etc.

Any luxury manufacturer that listened to someone claiming that their taste "can not be boiled down to a simple formula, I am more sophisticated than that" and makes a car without leather, a powerful engine with torque and a smooth ride would fail on the market.

But what color is "correct?" What color is "best?"

Color is the ultimate demonstration of this concept. If we exclude choices that are cheaper, easier to keep clean or more "brand appropriate" etc, you're left with just one thing, preference.

All women are doing in making these arguments is arguing that subjectivity exists, which isn't really an argument at all.