Why was Mister Feibleman 'expelled despite audio proving she begged for sex'¿

It is known that conviction rates for domestic violence and sexual assault are on the rise. Since violent crime in general is on the decline (as predicted from falling testosterone levels), I propose those conviction rates stem from a legal system stacked against men.

The knee-jerk reaction against this is suggesting some sort of proof. Usually audio/video recording or signed contracts. In my opinion following the advice to "get consent" is a terrible idea of giving the man a false sense of security in his mind while damaging the actual prospects he has in reality.

Legality of consent proof from videos & forms:

>A person who has freely chosen to have sexual activity with another person once does not give general consent to sexual intercourse with that person

>Consent may also be withdrawn at any stage during a sexual encounter. Recently I dealt with a case where the victim consented to sexual intercourse with her partner but asked him to stop when it became painful. He didn't stop. The accused was convicted

>[Pre-recorded consent evidence] is unlikely to be determinative when considering the issue of consent.

>What about a woman giving consent and then withdrawing it? Well that is still a lack of consent. A woman can give and can withdraw consent at any time, even once it's started

> Such video or oral evidence is not determinative of the question of consent, the actual encounter may have been different in nature or take place after the complainant had changed her mind.

But wait, there is more! In addition to being completely useless for defense, proof of consent is detrimental to proving proving innocence for the man:

> The recording may be used against the defendant to show how intoxicated the woman was, or that there was an element of control or coercion in the exchange. It may also be used by the prosecution to show that the defendant had doubts as to consent or knew he was taking advantage and deliberately trying to protect himself from an anticipated allegation. What's more, if there is any hint that the woman did not know about the recording, and that the defendant may obtain sexual pleasure from the video, the defendant could find himself facing more charges (such as voyeurism).

Source: Two Lawyers.

'But those are UK lawsers, it is different here in the United States!'

To that we examine the case of GirlsDoPorn. The creators had both collected written consent in the form of signed contracts and video recordings of the girls reading the agreement. Still got sued -and lost- for ironically supposed breach of contract.

. .

The vast majority of cases is less dramatic and noncriminal of course. The same principle applies for these legal cases. No matter what the woman signs about splitting assets, or how expertly prenuptial agreement is drafted by your lawyer. The family court-judge will throw it citing 'duress, unconscionable, representation, unforseen circumstances' or retroactively invented new caveats.