The unfortunate truth is that men will partner up with women they don't like at all if they have no other option because just being in proximity to a woman is seen as impressive. At first glance you might think this is a positive for women since we have access to a larger dating pool, but it's not tbh, because the second that person gets a better option you're cvcked. Most notorious victim I can think of is Mckenzie Bezos, poor lady went for a short ugly broke dude and the SECOND he had access to women he actually wanted, she got cheated on. Many such cases. I won't find myself in this situation ever idcidc.

Dudes here love to say that women who date attractive men deserve to get treated poorly bc "what did you expect from a man with lots of options." What I don't get is like under that logic aren't you admitting all men are the same and the only thing dictating their behavior is a lack of options? 😭 An ugly guy wants to cheat just as much as a hot one, he just doesn't have the opportunity. All men are equally as likely to treat you poorly, just pick the hottest one. I'm sorry but selectiveness from a more attractive person will always be more impressive than forced loyalty. So yes women should only date men who are attractive enough to exercise choice, because what happens when he does get the opportunity to cheat? This is the only way to avoid ending up with a man who secretly hates you.

"Commitment" or whatever from someone with literally no other options is worthless, it doesn't require any free will or morality, what is the point?