https://youtu.be/196jZsxVLCo?si=LTw0D0CL15nWJLxs

Long story short. The video in the link is about a man killing a woman with a sledgehammer in Welding area.

This post isn't necessarily about the situation itself. This post is more so about the reaction society usually has to situations like this. I saw a few comments saying the man would've never did this to another man, or saying this killing is a form of femicide/misogyny.

This made me realize that the average person is super slow when it comes to male strength limits. The average person view men as superhumans.

It's usually Feminists, blue pill white knights, and manosphere red-pillers with power fantasies that view men as superhumans. Because they all think men should use their super strength to protect women.

When in reality this is so stupid. Because the violent man in the video has a sledgehammer. This is not action movie or romantic novel. Most men can't fight attackers with weapons. Even the best UFC fighter in the world could get killed by a teenager with a knife. MF, Andrew Wilson couldn't even open a jar. Do you really think he can handle a sledgehammer? It's almost like people forget we live in a world where guns and knives exist, whenever it comes to these situations/topics.

So the claim:

“He wouldn’t do that to a man, it’s misogyny.”

…is just ignorance. A person willing to kill someone with a sledgehammer clearly…

isn’t socially calibrated

isn’t thinking rationally

isn’t measuring risk

and absolutely would harm a man under the wrong circumstances.

This is why it's irritating to constantly hear people saying shit like this "oH mEn cAn jUsT fIgHt bACk". Even if the man is a coward. He can still pick on other men too. Since men can be weaker/vulnerable too. And honestly, men are the better targets when it comes cowardly violence.

This is basically what Myron Gains does. He knows he can't fight women, because of the stigma of hitting women in society. He also knows he will get his ass kicked by a pro Boxer. So the next best thing for him is to pick on men who can't fight back. Since society doesn't care about men being vulnerable. So men like Myron get to have their cake and eat it too.

Men make up the majority of homicide victims. Feminists will say women are being killed because of their gender, while men aren't killed for their gender. Because of femicide. The problem here is that Feminists think all women deaths are related to femicide. For example, female gang members getting killed in Brazil or El Salvador still counts as femicide. Not giving a shit about the thousands of male gang members that are killed every year.

This has gotten so bad to the point that headlines about little boys getting killed don't get media attention anymore. For example, with the current situation in Nigeria with the terrorist group. The media only cares whenever that group are harming girls and women. They don't care when that group is constantly harming and kidnapping boys.

Back to men being more likely to get killed because of their gender. This is true in society. Even criminal organizations like The Mafia, Street Gangs, or one Percent Motorcycle Clubs have this code where they only go after other men, and not women or children. Making it seem it's a moral flex that they only kill men or something. And also most homicides are gang related. Whether it's gangs killing their opps or innocent bystanders. And surprise, surprise, the media only pay attention to the female bystanders that get killed.

And society subconsciously interprets this as:

“Men aren't killed for their gender, only women are.”

But in reality:

Men are disproportionately killed because they are men, both socially and strategically.

It's funny how both the Left or the right don't want to talk about how religion play a huge role in violence. Because people do a lot bad shit in the name of their sky Daddy. Heck even mental illnesses plays a role too (the left will ignore that though). But instead society would rather use men as a scapegoat instead. And paint men as these violent groups of monsters.

That's where the poor understanding of male physical strength comes into play here. Society wants to paint men as these beasts who could Hulk-out at any moment, and destroy everything. Or these superheroes who can fight against any threat.

This view of male strength is really harmful men. Because it perpetuate the idea of male disposability. People thinking men are these Superhumans who can handle anything. Therefore men must sacrifice their lives "for the greater good". This is why the most hardcore feminists will call men "pussies" for not protecting women in dangerous situations.

And before you say "mEn pRoTeCT wOmEn fRoM oThEr mEn, mEn aRe wOmEn nAtUrAl pReDaToRs".

Men aren't always a the threat women need protection from. Sometimes that threat is nature. There was a recent Earthquake in a country, (I forgot the country). Where women were complaining about men not sacrificing their lives to save them during times when people were stuck under buildings.

And ironically that threat can be a bear too.

https://youtu.be/vXQ__HFBorI?si=sS6ud1vlVEV65yhL

https://youtu.be/9sBpHhPY20M?si=xE6UE0mQwUHKOfJp

Side tangent here: I always see comments, where women are saying "tHiS iS wHy wE choOSe tHe bEaR". Or women even saying men and women should be separate. Even though I agree with that. But unfortunately the same women would start complaining about men not approaching them or interacting with them anymore. (https://youtu.be/T2_roCMSVng?si=lw5T5ARnDKxPyuuN)

TLDR: Society overestimates male strength, underestimates weapon dynamics, and uses the myth of male superhuman toughness to justify blaming men, shaming men, and discarding men.