TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Homeless non-men will receive basic income in Denver, Colorado.

rbrockway

September 26, 2022
937 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://avoiceformen.com/featured/homeless-non-men-will-receive-basic-income-in-denver-colorado/
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Homeless non-men will receive basic income in Denver, Colorado.
Author

rbrockway

Upvotes 937
Comments 177
Date September 26, 2022 12:54 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xoihr8/homeless_nonmen_will_receive_basic_income_in/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/homeless-non-men-will-receive-basic-income-in.1133820
https://theredarchive.com/post/1133820
Top posts by rbrockway

Unprovoked 'one punch' attacks are now subject to harsh penalties in Australia unless the perpetrator is a woman in which case she gets off with a small fine as usual.

3441 upvotes
February 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women treat each other worse at work then men treat women or women treat men.

3035 upvotes
February 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman burned 13-year-old boy's genitals with hot tongs for refusing sex

2919 upvotes
November 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman committing sexual assault at “Women’s March” identified and arrested

2765 upvotes
February 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Boys left to fail at school because attempts to help them earn wrath of feminists, says ex-Ucas chief

2614 upvotes
January 28, 2019
/r/MensRights

School proposes punishing boys by taking away part of their recess on International Women's Day

2488 upvotes
May 17, 2019
/r/MensRights

United Nations research finally admits that 94% of children held in bondage around the world are boys.

2424 upvotes
November 23, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women-only STEM college programs under attack for male discrimination

2130 upvotes
August 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 417 points418 points419 points 3 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

This is against the anti-discrimination laws and will be settled in court should it make it that far.

[–]spelczech 99 points100 points101 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

That's what happened to the PPP funds that the Biden admin tried to make available to all but non-veteran men a couple years back. Though I think by the time it got through the courts there weren't any funds left. Anyone here got any more info on that?

[–]Far-Reputation7119 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So everybody was qualified for the PPP funds, but not men?

[–]brokedown 35 points36 points37 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

https://nypost.com/2021/05/13/biden-admin-sued-for-pushing-white-men-to-back-of-the-line/

https://will-law.org/federal-appeals-court-bars-biden-administration-from-using-race-to-prioritize-covid-restaurant-relief/

[+]Aenima420 -15 points-14 points-13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So the post, which is a conservative tabloid and a story from the website of the group that brought suit talking about itself. Super legit sources. /s

[–]brokedown 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

website of the group that brought suit

you mean the website of the group that won suit

[–]TheNerdWonder -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I mean yes but the PPP stuff had a lot of problems. Especially since it was just rife with fraud and in general did not go to those who needed it. More often than not, it went to people who didn't need it including associates and supporters of the former POTUS which happens when you have a corrupt businessman and incompetent administrators with zero ethics making decisions for 4 years

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/07/company-that-gave-six-figures-to-pro-trump-super-pac-got-ppp-loan-over-5-million/

[–]manicmonkeys 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

From your own link:

"There is no evidence that the small business loan program — authorized by Congress to weather the economic storm of the COVID-19 pandemic — prioritized Trump’s political donors."

​

If there's evidence of Trump supporters getting special exceptions/prioritization for a program like this, then by all means that should be scrutinized. But please don't make baseless claims.

[–]TheNerdWonder 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Wouldn't call this baseless if it happened more than once and again, to wealthy people who did not need it including Trump associates. However, that does not mean Trumpers were the only ones who got it or engaged in fraud. I did not say that. They were just part of the discrete corruption and fraud that took place with the PPP loans that the public paid no attention to but the FBI visibly was in other instances.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.propublica.org/article/trump-friends-and-family-cleared-for-millions-in-small-business-bailout/amp

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/three-charged-covid-19-relief-fraud-scheme

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/south-carolina-man-convicted-covid-19-relief-fraud-first-atlanta-ppp-trial

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2022/06/feds-charge-19-defendants-pandemic-fraud-over-24-million-0

[–]manicmonkeys 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I literally work in fraud and personally have worked many cases associated with that exact type of fraud. I'm speaking from a position of professional knowledge.

​

"However, that does not mean Trumpers were the only ones who got it. I did not say that"

​

I never said you said that. What point are you trying to make that you think I disagree on?

[–]_TheyCallMeMisterPig 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Everyone stuck there hand in the cookie jar. But was it really more often businesses that backed trump? Your article doesnt actually make that distinction.

[–]TheNerdWonder 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I left this out. It happened more than once.

Either way, why or how did these wealthy people with still operating businesses get funding reserved for small businesses? Pretty clear that's some sus crap.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.propublica.org/article/trump-friends-and-family-cleared-for-millions-in-small-business-bailout/amp

[–]Alarming_Draw 85 points86 points87 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

This makes me so mad and angry I could scream. Really.

If I EVER hear ONE more woman bitch about "how tough women have it/the patriachy" Ill go fucking mental.

[–]narfywoogles 91 points92 points93 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to the matriarchy! You’ll be gaslit that it’s a patriarchy.

[–]Alarming_Draw 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I like your comment as its something I feel strongly-that feminism is a double lie.

Not only does it lie about the world "being run according to patriarchy".

But it lies again in denying the reality, that the world is run according to the matriarchy.

[–]narfywoogles 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s just like the lie hidden in “The Father of Lies”.

The Mother of Lies.

[–]MaxTheCatigator 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Our society is clearly gynocentric.

I see no matriarchy though, no cabbal of women heading some sinister group with the aim to dominate society or the world.

[–]Alarming_Draw 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Read "From Hell" by Alan Moore.

Many if not most societies are heavily influenced by Pagan/female God worshipping religions, and use other religions as a front to hide behind. But the real power is with THOSE people.

It also heavily influences "culture".

Whether organized or semi or shambolic, it is female led and influenced and structured. The worship of the woman. The society structured around protecting them and their emotions. However many male lives fall along the wayside.

[–]MaxTheCatigator 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that matriarchy though? IMHO gynocentrism is different, think "women and children first".

To me, an -archy is one head (usually one individual) who rules. Usually they are selected from/by an inner circle. Like the Catholic church, where the cardinals elect the pope from among them. But of course the pope doesn't have that much power any more in the western world.

[–]TheAynRandFan 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a woman, I absolutely agree.

[–]Far-Reputation7119 39 points40 points41 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I use to believe all the shit feminists have to say, but I now know they are so wrong. Never said this, but the female sex is very very privileged in the Western nations.

[–]mixing_saws 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Also in most asian nations.

[–]modsarebrainstems -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I agree that Western women are the most privileged, coddled and catered-to cohort of the human population to ever exist and it has made far too many of them utterly intolerable but I have to draw the line that it's like that in most Asian nations. My experience is quite the opposite in terms of what I've observed and with what you can see in the news on any given day.

[–]copeharderhun 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

but I have to draw the line that it's like that in most Asian nations.

Nope it is very true for Asia too. I live in Japan and women are mad privileged over here. Special laws helping only them, depending on the country there is mandatory military service for males but not females (South Korea and Singapore being big examples), women getting free stuff simply for being women, many places having free entry for women (including places that don't even make sense) while any attempts to have male reduced prices are immediately slashed down as "sexist", men having much much harder expectations on them than women, an insane culture of men must do everything for women etc etc. Indeed in Japan the way a traditional marriage works is the man goes out and works while the woman stays at home and manages all finances. The man gets a TINY (usually like 1000 yen or like $8 per day) allowance while the wife spends freely. Yup the man works and gets a tiny amount of money from his work while the wife spends it all on extravagant lunches with friends etc. Indeed this is one of the big reasons why our marriage rate and childbirth rate are so damn low - men absolutely do NOT want to get married because it's such a raw deal for them (similar to Western countries but even worse).

The biggest example of the lie that "Asian countries are so misogynist" is India. The insane level of privilege women have in India is mind boggling. Women only free stuff like bus rides, women not capable of being found guilty of many crimes including rape (to the point that when a 16 year old girl raped her 12 year old brother HE was the one who was arrested), special monetary aid for just women, special education privileges, any accident and they still follow the women and children first mantra etc etc. Look on this sub and you can find many a post by Indian dudes about this

Indeed you say "based on what I read on the news". This in itself is a bad basis as it relies on the assumption that the news is fair in their reporting. This is the opposite of the truth however. Just like Western nations the news in Asian nations doesn't give a shit if men die en masse. But if a woman is raped then fuck they are standing on the rooftops shouting it out and massive widespread protests. This is not because women are oppressed but precisely because women are privileged.

Indeed India once again is an extremely egregious example of this. If you were watching the news you'd think that India is a horrific misogynist nation filled with gang rapists. The truth is India has almost 2 billion people. Horrific crimes go on there every single day. Yet the only time you hear about them are when women are affected. This is not proof of oppression but privilege. Indeed in 1920s America black people being killed would be ignored while a white woman being killed by blacks would be national headlines for days. If you read the news at that time you might come to the conclusion that only white people are murdered and thus white people are oppressed but that is clearly the opposite of the truth.

That is why relying on what is being reported by foreign news outlets to decide if a country is misogynist is a poor basis. Because it ignores the huge fact that any crimes against the oppressed groups WONT be reported. The very fact the crimes against women are being reported in foreign languages shows they are taken much MUCH more seriously than crimes against men. It's like that old story about the guy who decided to put armour on the bits of planes that weren't damaged on planes coming back - you need to understand the gaps in reporting too.

There is a reason there is a HUGE anti feminist sentiment in Asia and rising (71% of South Korean men under 24 call themselves anti feminist). This idea that Asia is some misogynistic hellhole is laughable. Anyone who has lived here can tell you women are just as privileged, coddled, and entitled as western women. Getting quite sick of people who have never spent a day in Asia not can read any Asian languages of making assumptions about Asian countries based on biased media reporting. For example the Gender Gap Index that is used to declare Japan is super sexist is RIDICULOUSY biased and unobjective, and actually proves Japan isn't sexist when you look at the data properly (I even made a full post about this here).

You've done well in seeing past the programming on Western feminism. But don't try to cling on to the "well what they're saying about women in Asia is still true. Surely not EVERYTHING is a lie?" that is so common. Remember they literally lied to and gaslit you for decades about women being oppressed in Western society through every media channel available. Why do you think they wouldn't do the same about women in Asia? Come live over here for a few years and you'll change your mind extremely quick.

[+]modsarebrainstems -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I spent 11 years in China and travelled extensively. Just because a few Asian countries treat women well doesn't come close to encompassing all of or even most of Asia. Have you never heard of Afghanistan? Saudi Arabia? Any clue what's going on in Iran right now? And those are just the worst places. You're hardly in any position to lecture me on the average social standing of women in Asian countries just because you live in Japan now (one of the most advanced countries on the planet)

[–]Angryasfk 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Afghanistan? Saudi Arabia? Iran? They outweigh Japan and South Korea?

You said you lived in China for 11 years. What’s the situation there?

[–]MBV-09-C 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ever since the truth about that insanely biased reporting on boko haram victims came to light I've been taking every "women are oppressed" news in that general area with a grain of salt.

Roughly 300 girls kidnapped made international news and protests crop up nigh instantly, but over 10,000 boys kidnapped, tortured, enslaved and killed as child soldiers over the course of several years got practically a hushed murmur of news.

I'm convinced that in any of those countries you hear about women being treated terribly, the general male public is probably enduring just as harsh of treatment with only radio silence speaking for them.

[–]RedditIsProMisandry 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Privileged everywhere

[–]Arguesovereverythin 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't lose your cool. It won't help anyone, especially not yourself.

Best option I've found is to put some distance between me and people that speak like that. People are gonna bitch. You don't have to listen.

[–]DavidByron2 35 points36 points37 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Right. Cos homeless people are always hiring lawyers :)

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points58 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Somebody'll sue them, doesn't matter who.

[+]luminarium -16 points-15 points-14 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You need standing to sue on a matter. Standing usually means you personally are being hurt/disadvantaged in some way.

[–]Onithyr 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you think it'll be difficult for someone with the means and desire to sue to find someone who does have standing who will allow the suit on their behalf?

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You need someone with deep pockets to do this. And who will get sued? The City, or the program?

[–]elebrin 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is the sort of a situation where a lawyer associated with a charity could step in and offer services to a group of homeless people.

The downside is that they will need to find homeless men who aren't on drugs and are trusting enough to talk to lawyers. Which isn't necessarily gonna happen.

[–]KochiraJin 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They'll find someone if they want too. Unfortunately there are a lot of homeless people.

[–]drakgremlin 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Someone like the ACLU or other advocates will actually back someone who has standing to file a complaint.

[–]Arizth 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Someone like the ACLU

Considering they've been ideologically captured for years now, I can't see the modern ACLU doing this, unfortunately.

[–]drakgremlin 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Neither can I :'(. Hopefully someone with a legal background and a hard on for justice will step in and fix things. Although males not being a protected class will be a problem.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. Someone who can’t afford even the lowest rent will have to pay for a lawyer and court fees. Can see that happening!

[–]Angryasfk 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Just like Johnny Depp’s legal case showed that men are not disadvantaged in any way, so long as they have deep pockets and are the lust object for millions of women!

You’d need a class action with some top lawyer acting pro bono. And then there’s the costs to start the proceedings that someone’s going to have to foot. But hey, no problem, right?

[–]PrinceHabib72 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I went to the Denver Basic Income Project's website, specifically the Participant Criteria section. There is nothing at all about men being excluded, and nothing at all about transgender people and women being preferred. I think this is fake news.

https://denverbasicincomeproject.org/participant-criteria

Edit: /u/UnfurtletDawn is correct. The project as a whole is not discriminatory. However, the city of Denver's $2 million contribution is explicitly for women and trans people. DBIP is actually in a bit of a tough spot, but I understand them not turning down the money. Those women and trans people are still homeless, after all, and it would hurt them to turn the money away. The city council, on the other hand, can go fuck themselves with a dry cactus.

[–]UnfurtletDawn 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://denverite.com/2022/09/12/city-council-approves-2-million-for-the-denver-basic-income-project/

City council approved 2 million for the Denver basic income project that will specifically go to the women, transgender etc.....

That's where the discrimination is from.

[–]PrinceHabib72 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Great find. Edited. Thank you!

[–]UnfurtletDawn 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a little bit tricky to find that. Np.

It was your comment that got me into looking into it a bit more.

[–]TFME1 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hopefully before the money is spent. Otherwise, there'll be a lot of shrugs about what to do about it.

[–]deeredman1991 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it? Yes it's discrimination, but men are not legally considered a protected class.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The law says no discrimination based on sex. It's that simple. All of these laws that protect certain groups, not classes, are illegal and will not stand up in court.

[–]hehimCA 122 points123 points124 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is wrong, plain and simple.

[–]Booth_Templeton 174 points175 points176 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is comical. Even homeless men are not treated fairly in the homeless community. Political homeless environment. Whoever thought that could be another avenue for the liberals to get their claws in.

[–]DavidByron2 43 points44 points45 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's always been like this. These 2% of homeless are already getting the best treatment within homeless services.

[–]modsarebrainstems 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But do you realize that nearly %5 of the homeless population is female?! If we don't do something about this that figure could go as high as %5.3 ! We have to act now before even one more woman has to share the same fate as every man who didn't win life's lottery!!!

[+]Drewbus -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. If it was up to conservatives, the homeless would just get a job amirite?

[–]63daddy 98 points99 points100 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

  1. As I’ve said before, it’s really telling that governments not only discriminate against men, but flaunt it as a selling point.

  2. It’s clear the government is also misusing covid funds.

They are misusing funding and violating non discrimination laws. They obviously think they are above the law and need to be put in their place. I hope they are sued.

[–]MNCPA 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Aye. Call your local social services office of the government. Ask for help. You will not receive help.

Now, wait a few days, call back the exact same office and say that you are trying to help out your "sister" who needs assistance. You will get help.

I've straight up received offers for free gas cards, free grocery store cards, free auto repair, free housing vouchers, etc. In the end, I had to say that actually I needed help. Wow...sorry, sir we can't help you or your kids. Good luck.

[–]mixing_saws 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Disgusting. Just lie then. Someome needs to sue these sexists!

[–]Angryasfk 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s called fraud. They’ll get you for that. And that’s if you’re even able to access it if it’s in the wrong name.

[–]EvidencePlz 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This sounds tragic and so immoral :-(

[–]XoXSmotpokerXoX 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s clear the government is also misusing covid funds.

Trump wanted no oversight on any covid money. At least now they are starting to prosecute some of the fraud.

[–]ExMuzzy 54 points55 points56 points 3 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Discrimination that people will probably justify by saying women are extremely vulnerable. It's crazy.

[–]Far-Reputation7119 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yup. They always brush discrimination off. The draft? Who cares. Circumcision? Who cares, women like it better and it’s easier for women to clean when he’s in the nursing home. Homeless men being discriminated against? Who cares. Boys failing in school? Who cares, so long as girls are getting the proper education. Men losing their children during a custody battle? Who cares, women make better parents and are less likely to sexually abuse the children. The list goes on. I’ve heard all this shit before.

[–]mixing_saws 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

At this point all we can do is watch it all burn to the ground. When all these entitled women finally control most of the important jobs, everything will crumble. Because these jobs are tough as fuck. Most men doing these jobs right now only live to work. Do these entitled womanchildren that always get everything handed to them really have what it takes to do these extremely high demanding office jobs?

I doubt it.

[–]EvidencePlz 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because these jobs are tough as fuck

Oh no. The tough ones...I'd confidently bet 99% of women will refuse to do them, and come up with creative ways to avoid, regardless of what salary you are willing to pay. Point me to a construction site where women are applying for jobs in droves to do construction work. Having lived and worked in eleven countries of the world, in my personal experience, they would rather choose to do sex work than touch any of these essential, fundamental, dangerous and manual labor jobs with a ten feet pole.

[–]ExMuzzy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Talking of who does the important jobs, I saw a comment on askmen about what would happen if women disappeared for 24 hours. Someone commented that the world would collapse gave their reasoning which was utterly delusional. I thought they were trolling but they were serious lmao.

Air travel: No stewards, and they are critical to flight safety and can't fly without them.

Teaching: Don't have figures, but can't be far off 50/50 .... and yeah, no dinnerladies, so no food for the kids either.

Hospitality: pretty sure that's female dominated.

Utilities: I guess the marjority of engineers might be men, but with no women in the office manning comms, keeping track of systems and customers and etc, and basically telling the engineers what they actually need to do, that's going down too.

Motorbike: yeah, there's still be instructors, but again without the women actually organising and running shit, they's have no idea where the keys to the hi-viz tabard cupboard are so no lessons today.

And, fingers crossed Putin doesn't start a war that day, because no women to keep the country going while the men go to fight with the weapons the women aren't building

[–]mixing_saws 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What are these guys smoking? Honestly the only sector that would have problems is the health sector because most nurses are female.

[–]MBV-09-C 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Saddest thing is, I'm pretty sure there was an attempt for one international women's day where women didn't show up to work on a National scale. It, of course, failed, since really only the most privileged women that also had jobs could afford to skip a day without consequences. Though in the areas where women actually did stay home, the effort went mostly unnoticed and some men described the work environment to be more pleasant.

[–]Pluckytoon 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men that fails school could always become bricklayers /s

[–]needalife94 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How is this not sexism ? They are discriminating against men. Just fuck the homeless men I guess. :/

[–]Far-Reputation7119 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It’s becoming the norm to discriminate against men and white people, because of things that happened in the past, it’s fucked up. I started to sympathize with white people, as a black man, because I can somewhat relate to them by being a man and being punished for men’s past bad actions. Whites are being crapped on, because of things some white people have done in the past. All men are getting the same treatment too, it’s insanity.

[–]mixing_saws 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The vicious cycle of hate and violence. It never ends. Will we ever reach true equality between the sexes and the races?

Judging by social media violence could break out at any moment. And for what? Vengeance? That only creates more hate and violence. Are we really destined to fight each other until the other group goes (nearly) extinct or get enslaved? That cant be the endgoal. I really hope its not the endgoal.

[–]Soda_BoBomb 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We came close, soooooo close in the West. There was a time when we were preaching to judge people on the content of their character and their actions rather than their race, gender, or sexuality.

Unfortunately, the profitable activism just had to keep pushing, unable to admit they had accomplished their goals and just had to wait for society to settle.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The golden times were shortlived and are definitly over. Enjoy the quickly fading afterglow before we enter the next dark age.

[–]EvidencePlz 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s becoming the norm to discriminate against men and white people

​

The Royal Air Force has for the first time admitted "mistakes were made" with its recruitment practices following a slew of allegations that the service prioritised ethnic minority and female candidates over white men to hit "impossible" diversity targets.

https://news.sky.com/story/raf-admits-mistakes-were-made-after-claims-it-prioritised-hiring-ethnic-minority-and-female-candidates-12705894

[–]Pluckytoon 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only way white men could get any kind of society support would be coming out as LGBTQ it seems 🤔

[–]vhisic2 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I like that phrase, we should use it more in situations like this. "non men" really highlits that men are specifically excluded and everyone else isnt

[–]JadedLitigant1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

This is easy. Identify as a woman.

Checkmate, bigots.

[–]miladiashe 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to be exactly woman, just non man like non binary

[–]TheNatureGrandpa -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

💯 exactly this. If you live in an area where you can simply identify, DO IT when it allows for equality for you and to make a point about how insane it all is to begin with... you know, while it lasts before they repeal your right to.

[–]EvidencePlz -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you identify yourself back to being a man afterwards? The last time I tried wearing high-heels (out of sheer curiosity) it felt absolutely horrible. And the under-garments were equally uncomfortable.

[–]mostlydisposeable -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't gotta wear high-heels and knickers to identify as non-binary

[–]MBV-09-C 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody said you have to wear feminine clothes to qualify, a lot of women where I live could easily be confused for men if not for the make-up they wear.

[–]DavidByron2 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like illegal discrimination.

I wonder at what age a child becomes a male and thus gets no support?

https://travelnoire.com/denver-to-offer-140-homeless-people-12000-in-cash-as-part-of-basic-income-project

There's around 6888 homeless in the city and they are giving the $12,000 to the most privileged of the homeless - "women, transgender and gender non-conforming individuals"

That's about the 140/6888 = about the elite 2% of the homeless getting a further boost because they aren't men or tainted with the smell of men.

Well at least they're doing something for some homeless people, but it's illegal sex discrimination.

[–]63daddy 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ironically, men are routinely denied DV shelter access on the argument they are a minority. Here men are the clear majority of those needing help and are being passed over in favor of a small minority.

Such hypocrisy.

[–]DavidByron2 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It's not really irony. It's hate. Hate movements specifically (and right wing morals in general) deny that people should be treated the same just because they are in similar circumstances ("fair"). Instead "people like me" should be treated better. So feminists say women must always be treated better regardless of the situation. This is justified by saying women are good decent people you can trust ("in group") whereas men are evil violent assholes who are a threat ("out group"). All kids of tradcons believe something like this not just feminists. Men are violent and dangerous and have to be controlled. Women are innocent angels who must be protected.

It's not hypocrisy for them because they never believed in equality to begin with.

They just pretend to at odd times.

[–]63daddy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Hateful indeed, but it’s still hypocritical to make an argument when it benefits women, then ignore the same principle to disadvantage men in another situation.

[–]mixing_saws 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well the nazis see jews as subhuman so they have no problems with putting them into concentration camps. China does it too right now with special group of their population. Seeing people not as equal beings is the first step in the downward hate spiral. Because this way you can easily justify treating them like waste.

[–]63daddy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It seems society never stops justifying discrimination, we just change whom and why.

[–]mixing_saws 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup. I wonder if we will ever be able to live in peace and true equality. This constant fighting is so useless and tiresome. We could archive great things if put that energy into useful things.

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well no. Because they don't believe that people should be treated the same just because they are similarly situated to begin with. Hypocrisy is preaching one thing and doing the other.

[–]Harz3625261 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty funny because gender nonsense and "non-conforming" is an active lifestyle choice. Not like being male or female.

So they're homeless because they just couldn't manage to shut the hell up and get a job and go live on their own terms then become "non-conforming".

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't be like that. Those kids get kicked out of their homes by their own parents. They are massively over represented in the homeless population. It's really horrible.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not a sex issue. Tons of gay male teens get kicked out and live on the streets. A lot become prostitutes. This isn't political. I can't believe you'd try to say the parents are in the right.

[–]thatusenameistaken 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder at what age a child becomes a male and thus gets no support?

in general, when puberty hits.

most shelters start denying access to male children around 12. sometimes younger, sometimes they wait until 13 or 14, but in general once you hit that pre-teen year any chance of being a protected class is out the window for males.

[–]Surv1ver 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Is it even a universal basic income if it isn’t universal distributed?

I’m all for universal basic income, but excluding parts of the population based on something like gender, ethnicity etc. is just admitted that there are 1. and 2. class citizens.

What Denver is doing is just BUI-washing an American version of appanage.

[–]Harz3625261 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Well UBI doesn't work at all, and there's a reason it's asymmetrically applies, because there's only so much money.

But, asl always, they'll be racist and sexist because dumb shit white guys will still be slobbering to vote for some retard about abortion or something equally stupid.

[–]ThePiachu 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you don't have enough money for everyone, pay less but cover more people.

[–]Surv1ver1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Technically our currency is FIAT money, meaning that they aren’t bound by the gold standard. So nothing really stops us from just printing more money. The issue with just printing more money is that it will cause a hyperinflation, and hyperinflation is really bad for the economy. Personally I believe in the economic school of economics which is called monetarism, which dictates that the inflation should be kept under 2% per year.

[–]tiger_woods_is_goat -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm all for universal basic income

Why?

[–]Surv1ver 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that would be a bit off topic from discussing gender equality, but okay. Hell, I’m down for a trip off the rails if you guys are?

[–]ANUS_CONE 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't mean this as a joke, but seriously in this day and age, how are they even allowed to ask what sex or gender the person is?

[–]IronJohnMRA 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Comments are turned off.

Really? I wonder why? Thankfully, ours are on.

[–]XavierMalory 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aint enough water in the state to put out the flames that would scorch said comment section.

[–]hottake_toothache 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I really wonder if there will be a bachelor tax in my lifetime.

[–]mixing_saws 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When it comes im officially a nonbinary person. And many other men probably too.

[–]aries0413 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Everyone get a free ride except straight men.

[–]jesusandpals727 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What? Where are all the gay men benefiting from anything straight men are?

[–]whtsnk 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This program has nothing to do with s*xual orientation.

[–]XavierMalory 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Another good article on that site:

https://avoiceformen.com/featured/mgtow-and-female-disapproval-2-2/

The author herself admits (in a roundabout way) why men are “leaving the game.”

Who on earth will fund all these programs (e.g. “UBI” for homeless women) when the vast majority of the taxpayer base has not only left, but won’t sire anymore children who would grow up to be taxpayers themselves?

[–]mixing_saws 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they take all money from bezos? Who knows the feminists are in bed with the commies. They will go for the elites too. That will take care of all that for a while. Until even that perverse sum of money will run out. Slave labour for men then? Who knows. We will go back to the dark ages then.

[–]XavierMalory 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It’ll go the same was as Rome. The US will just import people to make up the tax base, and those people will bring a different culture with them. Eventually their descendants will be the majority and rewrite the laws.

The muslims are already doing this to a degree in the US and France.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup. But if they are careful they import people equally from different cultures so they keep fighting each other. But then maybe civil war. Thats not solution either. I will be living in a country thats the most stable and let this shit blow over. Prepare for the worst in the next 20 years.

[–]wowelysiumthrowaway 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes ive dropped out of the game by becoming a neet in 2010, and i did not because of this political bs but now i dont ever see myself contributing to society

[–]JidderS2 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just identify as a women.

[–]cbr2021 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Get use to discriminatory laws like these if men don’t have the brains (or the balls) to protest things out on the streets.

This is what feminists are good at, and they get the results.

[–]pappo4ever 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Men are working all day for money to maintain our feminists wives, if your job catches you in protests you are fired.

[–]Lionheart27778 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You kinda hit the nail on the head.

If you tell ppl you are an mra .....they look at you like you just told them you are a serial killer.

[–]pappo4ever 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women usually take the day off at work to go to protests. Try to do that as a men and see what happens.

[–]mixing_saws 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boss:"What is the protest about?" Him:"A better chance for fathers to get custody of their kids." Boss:"So you are an MRA, our feminists HR warned us about people like you. You are fired."

[–]mixing_saws 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats why i tell them im an egalitarian and i support equal rights for all people regardless of their gender or race. This is why im not a feminist. I care about all peoples rights not just womens. This shuts them up and you are still in a good light without betraying your own values.

[–]Your_Agenda_Sucks 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Homeless men should simply assert that they identify as toaster-ovens and they'll get the assistance they need.

[–]randomguy7277 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s when they decide to “pick randomly” like the $12k thing. I wonder how many non men vs men were/will be “randomly picked”.

I’m referring to the non binary males which I’m sure will not be in the “randomly picked” group by any large or = number

[–]smfuel87 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Not homeless, but I legally changed the status of my gender for just these sort of things.

[–]upsidedownbackwards 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If my state supported it I would have gotten the "X" gender on my drivers license just in case I needed to get around corruption like this someday.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whats the x gender ?

[–]upsidedownbackwards 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anything not M or F. Nonbinary, genderfluid, agender, whatever. It's the "And all the rest!" letter.

[–]smfuel87 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn't your state support it? Was this a federal thing or up to the states?

[–]upsidedownbackwards 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's up to the states, and my state is on the conservative side of things. It looks like only 3 states do it. California, NY, NJ.

[–]smfuel87 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, must be nice to live in the U.S.

Give it time though. Shits not getting any less crazy anytime soon. One day you can be an attack helicopter too.

[–]randomguy7277 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How do I go about that bro

[–]smfuel87 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here in Cali, it's just a form you fill out at the DMV. Takes about 5 min not including the 3hr wait in line.

[–]63daddy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. If the system is going to take advantage of men, then men should take advantage of it by choosing to identify as a woman. Be gender fluid.

[–]PumaRob15 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Good thing your not automatically a man anymore if you have a penis…

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They get pretty mad when a trans woman joins a women's sports team.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because its unfair to the biological women

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. If it were up to me I’d have a “women’s team” for biological women and an “open team” that everyone can try out for.

I’m just laughing at the irony of them pushing their narrative coming back to bite them in the ass.

[–]BoTheJoV31 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow. Most of the homeless are men, so they won't be helping a good portion of the homeless

[–]IronJohnMRA 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right. That's exactly the point. Deliberately not helping men.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its a PR stunt they help the homeless even the most disadvantaged in the public view. And they safe tons of money by actually only helping the 2% of the homeless. Its a perfectly evil plan to gain a better image.

[–]pappo4ever 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think is time that instead of the label LGBTQURLM or 'women and minorities' groups start referring simply as NM (Non-men) it would be much easier.

[–]XavierMalory 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably dating myself here, but it’s time to form the group that Al Bundy and his buddies made (the show Married… With Children):

NO MA’AM

National Organization of Men Against Amazonian Masterhood

[–]Hoopaboi 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How do I respond to people who claim that this is the result of the patriarchy, and that if we got rid of the grand unifying theory of the patriarchy, this would go away too?

I'm usually at a loss when they make these arguments other than just asking for evidence.

From my experience they'll usually do a "lol it's because of the expectation of men as the provider and women as the housewife, the same system actually hurts both of us" it sounds like a "both sides" argument and idk how to respond.

[–]mixing_saws 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They lie. Simple.

[–]KingKookus 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I identify as whatever gets me free shit.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then identify as a parasite :P

[–]StingRayFins 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I really don't understand how women are supposedly so strong and empowered and independent but constantly get free handouts, shorter sentences for crime, more support for everything, slap on the wrist, and believed no matter what.

It's really backwards and there's no way anyone has a future with a broken system running this way. It's a meter of time before all hell breaks loose.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They arent. They lie and distort. And everyone believes them because they are women and men love to simp. Our thirst for pussy was the reason we build this modern civilization and it will be the reason for us to go back to the dark ages. Because the pussy owners prefer short term goals over long term goals.

[–]Baboon_Stew 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And just like that, male homelessness disappeared overnight.

[–]Far-Reputation7119 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female privilege.

[–]NeoNotNeo 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Non men.

Someone please start a sub.

[–]lu_ke_44 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whats stupid too is the fact that they called them 'non-men' and not just 'women'

[–]wowelysiumthrowaway 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  • For a moment I have read it as homeless men and I was overjoyed; than I have to read it again

[–]SadGruffman -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Why not just give a universal basic income to everyone?

[–]XavierMalory -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

It’s a bad idea in general.

The United States got a taste of this when Covid was in full swing and the government was paying people. There were a ton of small time jobs that were no longer being filled because those who had to fill them were now getting a paycheck for free.

EDIT: To those downvoting me, my comment does not amount to “screw the lower class”. It’s about paying people fair and adequate compensation for their work.

Giving money to someone (male or female) for doing nothing but existing is a stupid idea all around.

[–]Schadrach 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There were a ton of small time jobs that were no longer being filled because those who had to fill them were now getting a paycheck for free.

So there were a ton of small time jobs that were important enough that they needed doing, but not important enough to pay enough to get someone to show up for?

Sounds an awful lot like perpetually depressed wages catching up to some employers.

Part of me has always felt that we also need a maximum wage law - mandate that the highest compensated employee of a company (including the C suite) can receive no more in total compensation than a certain multiple of the lowest paid employee, a certain multiple of the median employee, or both.

So for example say you have employees at the federal minimum wage and that multiple was x40 (this number is just an asspull for example purposes), in that case the highest permissible compensation for any employee would be equivalent to $290/hr, or $603k/yr. If you wanted to pay your upper management more, then the bottom has to go up too.

[–]XavierMalory 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Minimum wage was left at the same level and not increased along with inflation for many years; therein lies the problem.

They’ll need to increase minimum wage so people aren’t on starvation.

Sounds like a much better decision to make with the extra money instead of doling it out for free as UBI.

[–]deetar 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Said alternately, those with the poorest-paying jobs found the COVID relief payments to be more than their wage.

This is not an indictment of universal income. It's an indictment of employers who don't pay a living wage.

[–]excess_inquisitivity 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There were a ton of small time jobs that were no longer being filled because those who had to fill them were now getting a paycheck for free.

Not only getting a paycheck, getting one that was essentially $50k per year; often well over double their wage.

[–]mechajutaro -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a larger problem here that transcends gender https://www.wnyc.org/story/strengthening-welfare-work-system/ https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-i-learned-poverty-war-13513.html * If flagship MRA organizations like AVFM and HBR were serious about making progress, they'd have shunned any and all associations with modern day side-show attractions Carl Benjamin, Stefan Molyneux, Count Dank-ula, and some other loser who goes by Regan, in favor of partnering up with folks like Peter Cove and America Works. Start agitating for specific goals like abolishing most forms of welfare in favor of putting current recipients(even pre-COVID, fewer American men were in the workforce than was the case than at the end of The Great Depression. The trite excuse of "Well, the factories have closed down!!!" doesn't hold up, on account of the fact that we have a more diverse economy today than at anytime in history)into legit work + providing vocational training to those who want it, and we've got a shot at not just making life better for men, but lifting several million Americans in general out of poverty and into the middle and upper classes

*Quote from that article: " The reasons should have been obvious all along. Work maximizes a person’s capacity to achieve economic self-reliance. Work socializes people and instills a sense of personal responsibility in them. Work connects behavior and consequences. And it permits people, especially men, to obtain the admiration and respect of their spouses and children by supporting them." Prominent MRAs like Paul Elam, Alison Tieman, Tom Golden, Karen Straughan, and to a lesser extent Brian Martinez may not comprehend this, on account of the fact that they've each earned a small fortune via donations and(in the case of Elam and Golden)charging gullible men out their noses for "counseling services" of dubious merit

The other 99% of the male population will never achieve 18 minutes of fame as YouTube stars the way these folks have though, and our choices really are as stark as A). Leave the X-Box and the comic books back in middle school, and acquire an abundance of skills which make us marketable to high-paying employers, or B). Go through life with an encyclopedic knowledge of fantasy fiction, Star Wars trivia, and not much else-kinda like this ICMI '19 keynote speaker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxf0yzzuWCw -and pretend that never getting much further in life than stocking shelves at Wal-Mart or Tesco="being above and beyond so-called Norm-ie society, even though we're poor and highly susceptible to all of the ills that MRAs claim to care about"

[+]Psychadous -19 points-18 points-17 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So initial points -

  1. The source is definitely biased being a men's rights group so keep that in mind. We never want to forget implicit bias.

  2. The video is from Fox News. You can definitely hear the attempt at fear mongering.

What is more likely is that this is intended to be a pilot study. There probably isn't enough money to include all of the male homeless, so they were lazy and just excluded them. The study will likely run for a year or so and track outcomes. Then it could get turned into an evergreen program.

They should have included all groups possible (men, women, and children as well as varied demographics) but there's probably a huge budget restriction stopping this. So rather than dilute their data with only a few from each group, they focused it on "non-men". If successful, they'll likely expand it with more funding and then make it permanent. This has kinda become the way of doing things with UBI experiments.

Be careful about labeling things like this as misandrist without considering methodology, budget, or experimental constraints.

Edit: formatting

[–]Fearless-File-3625 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is not a single shred of truth in what you have said, but even if that was true it is still equally misandrist.

[–]Halafax 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If successful, they'll likely expand it

Doubt.

with more funding

Double doubt. They specifically excluded the largest demographic to limit the cost

and then make it permanent.

ow, my sides.

[–]Nergaal 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

proof that men are disposable

[–]IronJohnMRA 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The organization running the project:

https://denverbasicincomeproject.org/home

​

Contact info:

Denver Basic Income Project
303.305.4066
[email protected]
1536 Wynkoop St., Suite 223, Denver, CO 80202

[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Y'all act shocked.

You ever paid attention to who makes yo the decision making corps in most social service agency offices?

[–]AtemAndrew 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And then, for no reason at all, the amount of LGBTQ representation in the homeless population skyrocketed.

[–]rabel111 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexist pigs running this disgusting program. They should be held accountable for the discrimination.

[–]alexmijowastaken 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf

[–]UnfurtletDawn 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://denverite.com/2022/09/12/city-council-approves-2-million-for-the-denver-basic-income-project/

From the project itself there is no requirement on gender on their website.

But city council approved 2 million for Denver basic income project.

Money will go to 140 women, transgender and gender non-comforming people.

So now it is gender based discrimination cause the money were donated by the city specifically for that one group.

The project itself is not obliged to help everyone.

[–]JohnnyJohnson11 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not okay with my tax dollars going towards this. I live in Denver. The homelessness problem is out of control. Most homeless people are men. So you're only going to fix, like what, 10% of the homelessness problem? MAYBE, by giving women money?

[–]CanniBal1320 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is just cruel man

[–]Blood2999 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just why?

[–]Spare_Development615 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Money is fungible.

If they allocate $2 million to women only that's $2 million they don't have to spend out of other budgets that can then be diverted to homeless men.

Whether that will actually happen is anybody's guess, all I'm saying is that money is fungible, it can be advertised for one purpose and used for another.

Women have alot more empathy in society than men, so if you're collecting money or trying to convince a city council then "help the homeless women" works better for actually getting funding.

Of course it'll mostly go towards men because that's who the majority of homeless people are.

[–]BainzXoXo 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My browser is acting fucky and won’t open it. Is it explained why?

[–]aigars2 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Less and less reasons to stay and pay taxes.

[–]Anih1list 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s to balance out the male privilege held by those men /s

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter