TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

This article reads like some Chad rejected the writer after telling him she has gonorrhea from her blianta leadhbógach!

Maximum-Complaint-68

March 16, 2022
262 upvotes
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
https://archive.ph/50dGY
Archived from /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen is a community dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title This article reads like some Chad rejected the writer after telling him she has gonorrhea from her blianta leadhbógach!
Author

Maximum-Complaint-68

Upvotes 262
Comments 222
Date March 16, 2022 9:23 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/tfdkyg/this_article_reads_like_some_chad_rejected_the/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/this-article-reads-like-some-chad-rejected-the.1107313
https://theredarchive.com/post/1107313
Red Pill terms in post
Chadcock carousel
Top posts by Maximum-Complaint-68

Hilarious that a feminist is expecting a sub to be open to her idiocy. Has she never been on ANY feminist sub? I do not think there are any that allow a free discussion.

4012 upvotes
September 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

This describes a good handful of the abarlacha that get featured on this sub

757 upvotes
August 7, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Tell everyone here that you’re an straip without directly saying you’re an straip

657 upvotes
November 2, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

I 100% guarantee that feminists would swipe right on a child-raping, Nazi-sympathising Chad. Political views somehow seem to fall by the wayside when you whip out an bod capall 8-orlach!

546 upvotes
December 31, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

What’s the matter, honey? I thought charging $5 to show your brollaigh to the world and shoving things up your coinín made you an empowered woman?! LOL 😹😹😹😹

416 upvotes
December 10, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

We're out here dodging bullets. Who the fuck would want to be with a woman that thinks like this?!

386 upvotes
May 7, 2022
/r/AntiFeminists

Josef Stalin called. He wants his red flags back from this leibide págánach! Congratulations, you're everything a self-respecting man doesn't want: a single mother, more baggage than a Boeing 747, physically unfit, an alcoholic, into New Age legbeard shit and positively insane!

353 upvotes
December 23, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Imagine waiting to cheat on your husband after becoming an stiúsaí fealltach with a bad case of tingles. Jesus Christ.

302 upvotes
December 3, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Comments

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™[M] [score hidden] 4 years ago stickied comment (15 children) | Copy Link

It has come to my attention lately that men are somehow still (in 2016) uncomfortable, turned off and even disgusted by a woman's sexual history.

This has always been the case and it always will be. This double standard that you whine about is a direct result of the fact, that men and women seek each other for entirely different reasons.

This is why we have double standards galore. You're bitching about the ones that you perceive to be advantageous to men, but I'm sure you're perfectly fine with the ones that are advantageous to women.

Why is virginity so important anyway?

What IS marriage anyway?

What is marriage anyway? - let's talk about consent.

Cheers!

[–]nicethingyoucanthave27 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

men and women seek each other for entirely different reasons.

The gender-flipped version is some guy saying “It has come to my attention that women value financial security! You have no right!!!”

[–]loneliness-inc18 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You have no right!!!

It's always amazing how they lecture us about what preferences we do and don't have a right to have.....🤦‍♂️

[–]ronoda1220 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Virgin women will always be preferred for marriage and kids.

[–]loneliness-inc13 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Virgin women will always be preferred for marriage and kids.

Correct.

[–]Rick2643 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Very true , the male mind is naturally and unconsciously revolted by promiscuity.

[–]Jihocech_Honza12 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Virginity should never be lost; it should be exchanged for marriage."

Bryan Houghton

[–]Typo-MAGAshiv6 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Cheers!

Seinfeld!

[–]loneliness-inc4 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I've been using this ending for years. 🤷‍♂️

It's my happy ending 🙃😂

[–]Typo-MAGAshiv2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I've been using this ending for years.

I know. I'm just being a smartass and declaring that Seinfeld was a better sitcom. :P

It's my happy ending

Wow, and no one had to shell out the extra $50?

[–]loneliness-inc2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I know. I'm just being a smartass and declaring that Seinfeld was a better sitcom. :P

Can't argue with that. He's profesh.

Wow, and no one had to shell out the extra $50?

Is that what it goes for these days?

Alternatively, you can just say that posting here is just a fun circlejerk 😂🤣

(Now watch our detractors gobble up this fodder 🙃)

[–]Typo-MAGAshiv2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Is that what it goes for these days?

No idea. Never done it, and don't plan to.

(Now watch our detractors gobble up this fodder 🙃)

Pfft. It doesn't matter what we say; those morons always find some way to twist it into the caricature of what they think we are. Like that one dipshit you banned yesterday who thought that understanding that men and women are not equal is misogyny.

[–]loneliness-inc3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Well.... understanding is a form of logic and....

Logic is a tool of the patriarchy!!!

[–]Bob_and_Virginia3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Beverly Hills 90210!

[–]Typo-MAGAshiv3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Sucked! And wasn't a sitcom!

[–]sleepyweaselisawakePlowing his way through muck 205 points206 points207 points 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

"Let me tell you something a friend once said to me that really stuck: A woman's life is not practice for being your wife."

And, men's lives aren't a grind so you can you can leech off his hard work you're 30 and suddenly ready to settle down and be a housewife.

[–]Wherethetoasterlies 60 points61 points62 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

I've recently told this to someone who somehow managed to get married and fuck it up by cheating, over and over (late 30s with a hoard of kids in tow) there will always be a beautiful, younger woman with no kids and less baggage waiting to replace you in the spotlight.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 43 points44 points45 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

there will always be a beautiful, younger woman with no kids and less baggage waiting to replace you in the spotlight.

No that is not true, says FDS.

[–]cautionTomorrow555feel your eggs rot. smell the sulphur. 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fat Delusional Skanky is what FDS stands for.

[–]hornetsfalcons12Jr. Hamster Analyst 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’ve always noticed that the difference between men like in here, and women who post in FDS, is that this community simply want men to avoid bad women. FDS seems to HATE men. But it kind of goes back to the idea that men want women, women need men

[–]cautionTomorrow5559 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Too bad single women who are not trash are as rare as unicorns. Because dating is so easy for women and because men want them so much more any woman who is an even halfway decent person will get married before she is 25.

[–]AldabruzzoNo busted Pillsbury biscuit cans 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fat, Drunk, and Stupid

[–]Wherethetoasterlies 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahh yes FDS, thanks for reminding me of their existence lol

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 59 points60 points61 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No - but if that is the role she wants then your relationship will be that practice. And she will also need to meet the entry requirements. Two points many of these women simply will not accept

[–]sleepyweaselisawakePlowing his way through muck 53 points54 points55 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No - but if that is the role she wants then your relationship will be that practice.

She can want that role until her end of days, no guy owes her a relationship. And, most guys I know aren't interested in them.

[–]knucklz74 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman can at somepoint ever want to be a wife , yet if she never grew up seeing her mother , geandmother doing that then chances are not great they will have it in them. And the unfortunate thing about today's world is most women have not seen that or come across it so they unfortunately will never succeed in their endeavors

[–]cautionTomorrow555feel your eggs rot. smell the sulphur. 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

And, men's lives aren't a grind so you can you can leech off his hard work you're 30 and suddenly ready to settle down and be a housewife.

Exactly when I was in my 20s and struggling women were either not willing to date me or if they were willing treated me terribly. Now that I am in my 30s and making six figures from working hard struggling in my 20s they expect me to be the beta bailout and give them kids. No that isn't how this works actions have consequences why should I give you the rest of my life and money when you wouldn't give me even a handful of those good years while you still had your looks? Now I look at it from a completely transactional viewpoint and it makes women furious especially the refusing to have kids one that one caused one woman to almost have a temper tantrum in the restaurant. You don't get to be a housewife with no job if you didn't give me your 20s now the last of your eggs are going to rot and you are going to die alone with no descendants fuck you.

[–]Ok_Management4634 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You are a smart man. Women reap what they sow, they had about 10 years to lock you down, they missed the boat. Now they have nothing positive to offer.

[–]cautionTomorrow555feel your eggs rot. smell the sulphur. 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Based on the women I have gone on dates with all they offer is a warm hole attached to a woman with a terrible personality which doesn't entice me as much now that I am older and if it did I can get a hooker for cheaper than what the average woman would cost me. At least ugly hookers give a lower price knowing they are ugly but ugly women expect a rich prince charming still.

[–]BioStu 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That’s the thing that befuddles me. Unattractive women thinking they deserve the same outcome that attractive women get.

[–]cautionTomorrow5556 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

They really just don't understand it and women refuse to lower their standards even if they themselves bring nothing to the table or even sometimes negative value. I blame feminism for blowing the message of women are perfect no matter what up womens ass so much they think that is true because older women from before that became more common that were below average looking learned to at least develop a personality and lower their standards.

[–]lurkerhasarisenA Strategist Among Tacticians 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

🎶And then one day you'll find 🎶

🎶Ten years have got behind you 🎶

🎶 No-one told you when to run 🎶

🎶 You missed the starting gun 🎶

  • Pink Floyd ("Time") a.k.a., the Inspin Anthem

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This woman is now 29 and single. It will be interesting to see what happens in the next 5 years. She is blessed with good looks, so access to men is easy. Time will tell if what she wrote is true or BS in her own life.

[–]lurkerhasarisenA Strategist Among Tacticians 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was written in 2016. The future has already arrived.

[–]Yggdrasill4 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is always those magical years of 28-34 that they begin to realize that their actions may actually have consequences. At 29, now she is complaining about getting commitment and blaming men, so predictable🥱

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At 29, now she is complaining about getting commitment and blaming men, so predictable🥱

She is just at the age where she is beginning to see that she is aging out and losing out to younger women.

She: How come men are approaching younger women instead of me?

[–]biccat 179 points180 points181 points 4 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

I look forward to the next installments in this series:

Why His Criminal History Has Nothing To Do With Your Relationship

Why His Net Worth Has Nothing To Do With Your Relationship

Why His Height Has Nothing To Do With Your Relationship

[–]KundaliniMeru 71 points72 points73 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Misogyny!!!

[–]Loud-Bottle-7879used to be edgy 62 points63 points64 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Basically. Why don’t they date murderers, rapists, and pedos? I mean the past is the past. The audacity to think they can judge one’s character by their history of actions. How illogical.

[–]zansiball 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair they do date them. If the ringles is there its ok.

[–]BeholdTheHaircan't be arsed to customize his flair 48 points49 points50 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Oh you sweet summer child.

A lot of women do date those men. Or at least fuck them. Being a criminal, especially a violent criminal, makes them dangerous. As we all know from having been stupid teenagers, danger is often exciting, particularly to those too foolish to see the obvious problem with courting it.

I think it was Charles Manson, or perhaps Ted Bundy - or, hell, both, and probably more besides - who (in)famously received stacks of letters while he was on death row from amorous women who wanted to fuck him before he died. Many of the women explicitly wanted him to impregnate them.

There was also the experiment of sorts conducted by some redditor using the photographs of a male model on a Tinder profile stating he was a convicted pedophile hoping to "cure" himself by fucking a bunch of skanks (that was more or less the exact wording he used - I don't have the link handy and I'm not looking it up right now because I'm at work). When women matched this profile he'd ensure they'd actually read the bio and understood what the imaginary stud had done and what they were agreeing to. Not only were they okay with it, many of them seemed irritated he was bringing it up - they'd already moved past him admitting to raping children and just wanted to jump his bone.

[–]The_Choir_Invisible 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There was also the experiment of sorts...

I remember seeing that! Holy shit, I'd almost forgotten...or maybe blocked it out.

Not only were they okay with it, many of them seemed irritated he was bringing it up - they'd already moved past him admitting to raping children and just wanted to jump his bone.

Yep!

[–]WallyWithanEmail 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That must have been around 2016? At the time I questioned it's authenticity. Less so now...

[–]BioStu 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ted Bundy was fucking women while he was on trial. You can’t make this shit up

[–]WallyWithanEmail 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ted Bundy was the most charming of the psycho killers though

[–]ZarBanditDefinitely NOT a Talking Potato 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There was a whole subreddit dedicated to that black pill. Chad fishing. It was so insanely funny, disturbing and revealing that it absolutely had to be banned.

But man…what a ride!

[–]Anonymous_fiendWahmyns 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The worst part is that psychopathy and similar disorders are highly hereditary. Now combine that with the higher crime rate of children from single moms. These women WANT to raise serial killers & rapists.

[–]Saianna 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

there was an article about experiement some folks did, where they made fake male accounts, you know 11/10 chads that every woman literally salivates over. It didn't matter if you were rapist or pedophile (!!!) as long as you were the ultimate handsome beast of a man.

I remember having the link hidden but.. damn can't find it anywhere.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you search "Chadfishing" on Google or YouTube it'll usually come up, along with lots of responses.

[–]biccat 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did a search. Lots of articles where women are upset for being called out for being complete sluts.

[–]Bob_and_Virginiabeware of Shawskank Redemption 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That was The Chadfish Experiment.

[–]Saianna 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, when googling i definitely see the same screenshots. The one i had was set up as very neat article, though.

But yea, that's the thing :)

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But women sure can judge a man by his height all the time.

[–]jmpiresJr. Hamster Analyst 33 points34 points35 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You should know "his" height applies above 6 ft, otherwise is "its" height... /s

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well stated. Anything under 6' is an it.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For anyone reading: that's usually bullshit posturing on the woman's part when she says something like that. Most can't even tell the difference anyway if you're in the 5'9"-6'2" range.

[–]WallyWithanEmail 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats what i keep telling my teenage son. He's like 5'11.5", but really wants to hit 6ft. Like wtf ever dude

[–]chankletavoladora 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On point.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You will see her write those articles when hell freezes over.

[–]AldabruzzoNo busted Pillsbury biscuit cans 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your wish is my command.

[–]Rick264 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell this to any woman who uses the "my past has nothing to do with the relationship " and watch how fast you become a mysoginist, sexist and incel.

[–]Rick264 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell this to any woman who uses the "my past has nothing to do with the relationship " and watch how fast you become a mysoginist, sexist and incel.

[–]Rick264 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell this to any woman who uses the "my past has nothing to do with the relationship " and watch how fast you become a mysoginist, sexist and incel.

[–]Solinas86 119 points120 points121 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

On other news: your car accidents history has nothing to do with your driving insurance cost

[–]chankletavoladora 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One if the best analogies I’ve heard.

[–]lorum_ipsum_dolorJr. Hamster Analyst 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To add to this, it's also like saying "Why should living in a neighborhood with the highest auto theft in the nation affect my insurance cost?"

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

And the number ofpast divorces have nothing to do with future marriage success.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 68 points69 points70 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That’s pretty much the message being pushed. And they are shocked that guys aren’t going for it

It is the same “logic” that will allow women to say with a straight face that they will make a guy they “care for” or “see a future with” wait longer for sex and do less with them. It just demonstrates that their don’t know and/or care what men think and want

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That’s pretty much the message being pushed. And they are shocked that guys aren’t going for it that along with fat acceptance.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh gosh they definitely aren’t going for fat acceptance. Because that one is a double standard that even normie men can spot

[–]RawLikeSushi84 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Haha the queen part reminds me of the fds posts. This made me lol

[–]Jihocech_Honza 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am just a duke, a queen is too much for me.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha the queen part reminds me of the fds posts. This made me lol

Me, too.

[–]I-am-the-lulAll Ass No Stick 71 points72 points73 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Don't you just love how the article is attempting to guilt you into not rejecting a "free spirit" for a relationship?

[–]urbana1 43 points44 points45 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Telling us we have no right to judge…yes we do! Yet another woman trying to tell men what to do

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When will they work out that they can’t actually do this?

I know it is based on the flawed premise that men are “telling women what to do” when they are rejecting them for being overly promiscuous. But they are not. No one is telling them not to do it. We know better than that. We know what the backlash will be. It is just consequences for actions

It would be so much easier for women if there was a direct message as a popular narrative telling them not to do it. Then they could rail against it, go on marches etc.

But that isn’t the case

[–]urbana1 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are totally within their rights to be slutty and promiscuous and date chads and get pregnant and become sponges on the state but that gives us the right to say we don’t want any part of that and to feel uncomfortable with her terrible decisions from the past.

[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I hate the term but I fit their "free spirit" stuff pretty well and can say exactly why it's a relationship disaster. "Free spirits" are very used to doing things their way, to a fault. They do whatever they want to do, go where they want to go. "Free spirits" tend to be incredibly selfish.

Relationships are about compromise. They're straight up incompatible with someone who goes where the wind takes them. If you try to help them mature and behave like adults should they're going to see you as controlling. They're less concerned with consequences so they make a lot of poor choices to keep themselves amused/happy. These are not people you want to trust with responsibilities.

Most (probably including myself) are not going to do fantastic later in life because of the short sightedness that is required to prance through things without being worried about anything more than a month or two in the future. They're fun in the "now" but are incapable of handling an adult relationship with a stable person.

[–]I-am-the-lulAll Ass No Stick 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A lot of women are happy to self-identify themselves as "free spirits" which is their go to term when they don't want to be called a slut.

I think we should use the term "free spirit" when we talk about sluts as a way of getting around censorship, just as long as men understand that "free spirit" equals slut, it works just as well.

[–]user84893093748959Jr. Hamster Analyst 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

we should use the term "free spirit" when we talk about sluts

I can get on board with this.

[–]OverkillengineCasts Pearls to the Swine 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would be cruel to chain a free spirit down with a relationship, much less a marriage. 😏

[–]onlypinhead2000 64 points65 points66 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sleeping around with reckless abandon? Hard pass......

[–]Land_of_the_Losersthe-niceguy.com 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

♪♫ Cuz she's gonna party all night, gonna keep this party goin' cuz the party won't stop...♪♫

[–]onlypinhead2000 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That shit is expensive. I'll take a tasty cigar and an audiobook please.

[–]Overlordofwhatever 64 points65 points66 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I never get the logic. If you're free to sleep with whoever and however many men, we're free to judge you, especially if you're going to be our partners. How is that complicated? Like why does this need to be reiterated so many times. Her sleeping with 100 men is her choice. For him to judge she's unfit for relationship is his. And both choices matter.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 50 points51 points52 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Because they always regret it after the fact when they can’t do anything to change it. Other than try and change the narrative

[–]moorekomUrban Hoe Guerrilla 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They don't regret it. They just don't like the consequences for it.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They don't regret it. They just don't like the consequences for it.

Very true. If they could ride the CC for 50 years, they would.

[–]Smartcom51 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

One can strongly believe, that if their fertility-window (as some extreme example here) would only close upon reaching the age of say 100 years, they'd walk around f—ing everything male that moves up for easily 95 years straight – just to try to settle and start a family with a beta at the last chance when being old and before the last important Os are drying up with none whatsoever remorse.

It's female nature to try just having fun – they're run on and fueled by emotions.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“It” was a vague and nebulous term I admit. I of course meant they regret how they are now treated as a result

[–]lorum_ipsum_dolorJr. Hamster Analyst 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not complicated, they think it's just unfair.

[–]Overlordofwhatever 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it's always the same self righteous rhetoric in which they are the victims

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And both choices matter.

More importantly is that both have choices. I don't want a hoe as a wife. That is my choice, not hers. What she chooses at that point means nothing to me.

[–]DaddySkrags 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Past behaviors are indicator for future actions.

[–]One-Move 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, like chest tattoos, obese and children, we get also shamed for not accepting these past bad decisions.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™[M] 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Past behaviors are indicator for future actions.

True.

But even if she's truly reformed and will truly be the best wife ever....

Do you really want to pay full price for second hand goods???

Make no mistake - marriage is beyond full price.

[–]Land_of_the_Losersthe-niceguy.com 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

STDs are but a patriarchal myth, I see.

Don't mind that these same guys have slept with the entire cast of "90210" ... because that's different, right?

That's ludicrous. Nobody in their right mind wanted to fuck Andrea Zuckerman.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“These same guys” - oh so the top guys who wouldn’t commit anyway? Got it

[–]Land_of_the_Losersthe-niceguy.com 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ian Ziering. She's specifically talking about Ian Ziering.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

As others have said - this article is dripping with apex fallacy. Most men don’t have to worry about being called a slut for casually sleeping around. This is true. Why? Because most men don’t have that option available to them.

[–]Land_of_the_Losersthe-niceguy.com 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, there's the whole "only one sex can get pregnant" thing whereby, in the pre-birth-control era, it really wasn't necessarily in a woman's best interests to sleep with 7 different dudes per week. But, in modern times, that would now be chalked-up to the reckless irresponsibility of those 7 dudes I suppose.

[–]polishknightusaEndorsed Winged Hussar 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There's another reason: Commitment. A woman who has shown she can easily get men AND takes advantage of that (sluttiness) has demonstrated that she knows where the CC carousel is and has a season pass.

There are still TONS of men who would be happy to shack up with a former slut but he wouldn't mingle his finances with her. It would be FWB which isn't necessarily a bad thing. That's what "true love" is anyway, yes?

Up until recently, most men didn't even IMAGINE vetting women for safety beyond her body count but today, any basically educated man should know about divorce courts, child-support and so on and that a woman who has walked out on a hundred guys before could leave him holding the bag.

[–]FatherUnbannable 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a lot of men who would even share their finances with a slut. She wouldn't date a male feminist tho, lmao.

No, Chad should become a feminist, not these icky slug-men.

[–]Divine-Nemesis 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“Does not define her moral character”

Uh yes it does. These 304’s are ruining the image of women. No amount of shaming would ever make me look at my significant other with respect after talking about sucking off every dude at a party. If women bounce from man to man as she is talking, the word commitment means Jack shit when trust comes into play because that sex drive is strong and needs to be filled. Just gross……….. What a dumb article from a jaded whore.

[–]Disastrous-Ad1334 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well she does sound bitter probably because the White Knight she wanted to save her from spinsterhood, box wine and mistreating cats didn't wife her up because he found out she was a 304.

[–]ReclusivePariah 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

As a grown man, you should be able to understand that the number of people a woman has slept with 1) does not directly affect her moral character, and 2) really doesn't concern you. So, to all of the men out there who refuse to date, marry, befriend or associate themselves with a woman because of her number, grow up.

The stupidity in the closing paragraph is TOO DAMN HIGH!!

1) does not directly affect her moral character

Having a multitude (even just one) increases someones (regardless of gender) likelihood of cheating and initiating divorce. The likelihood of you cheating is an indictment of your character or lack thereof. Which leads to:

2) really doesn't concern you

Due to the above - yes it does

grow up

We have, unlike you we stopped drawing on our faces

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman telling a man how to be a man. As usual - reverse it and imagine the reaction

[–]One-Move 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

😂 right, she does not get, that a man refusing her for high N count actually has grown up and wants a wife not a P&D

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

a man refusing her for high N count actually has grown up and wants a wife not a P&D

Well said.

[–]Joaquino7997 33 points34 points35 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She may not have to tell every excruciating detail, but to flat out decline to disclose any information is just plain wrong. If she's not willing to discuss her sexual past with me for fear of being ridiculed, then what else is she hiding?

Abortions? Evictions? Bankruptcies?

A relationship with no trust isn't worth a damn. Best to walk away from those type of women.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To a woman like this the abortions would come under sexual past. So that would be hidden as well

[–]3HardWaySr. Hamster Analyst 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she's not willing to discuss her sexual past with me for fear of being ridiculed,

It means she has a sexual past that is an object of ridicule, by her own estimation.

Remember, what women say and reality are very different. Women like to preach about "Judgment free" and pay it all kinds of lip service. However, no one judges more harshly than women. And they do it constantly.

[–]lurkerhasarisenA Strategist Among Tacticians 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I have long maintained that when it comes to relationships, either party is free to ask any question about any subject that matters to him/her. The person being asked has no obligation to answer, but if he/she does answer, the answer must be the truth.

The person asking the question has the absolute right to make decisions regarding their future participation in the relationship based on that answer / non-answer.

A man may decide that he doesn't want to marry a woman whose number is above a certain amount (for me the number was zero except for a widow I dated), and that's fine. Some woman may decide that she doesn't want a man whose height is below a certain number, and that's also fine. The point is that we all have to live with the consequences of our choices (and attributes we didn't choose), and we don't get to tell people what should matter to them. We also know that the choice to reject too many people may result in getting nobody at all (we see that here every day when women make 40-point checklists that no one man can match).

Just as no woman owes sex to an incel, no man owes a relationship to an inspin, and the reason for the rejection is nobody's business... so a writer calling guys with standards "insecure little boys" does nothing but demonstrate her sense of entitlement to tell other people how to live their lives. If she wants a particular guy (such as the kind of guy who could sleep with the female cast of "90210"), she needs to either provide what those exceedingly-rare men want or look elsewhere.

Edit: during my years as a bachelor I declined relationships with women who were interested in me for various reasons, and had women I was interested in decline my offers for reasons of their own. That's life. In the end I met and married a woman who met my standards and whose standards I met. We've been together for well over 30 years, and neither of us has ever regretted that decision.

[–]Winter_Lie_4994 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn’t even consider this. Very true

[–]OverkillengineCasts Pearls to the Swine 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Maybe if she didn't expect men to pay fresh Wagyu Prime Rib prices for manager's special ground chuck that has had a hundred+ dicks stuck in it, she'd not be in her current predicament of having to write "the Lady Doth protest too Much" tier blogs.

And of course the usual apex fallacy of "Men Chad does it too!" in action.

There is a reason she's still single. She is trying to compete in the commitment market with non commitment tier goods, and on top of that, she's trying to get the VIP's to buy into her roach infested street vendor shack when they could afford far better.

Play stupid slut games, get stupid slut prizes.

Maybe if they had chosen better they'd not be looking down the barrel at a future of dying broke and alone in a puddle of their piss and shit in a nursing home because they have no one able or willing to care about them.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I once had a woman in a YouTube comments section insist that these type of articles (bolde and the like) were all fake. The rationale? That they used stock images rather than images of the author

You couldn’t make it up

[–]user84893093748959Jr. Hamster Analyst -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is always an argument that someone pushing bad behavior are engaging in a psy-op to get bad results for others that would be foolish to embrace such bad advice. Sort of how most of the wealthy advocate for the acceptance of homosexuality, divorce, abortion, and race mixing but would never do or allow such activities in their own personal lives.

[–]One-Move 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I find it always very amusing, the want us to commit and if we (or the desired men) don’t want to, they don’t know how to react, “i have always gotten what I wanted”. Much like a spoiled child, who never learned to behave to get what they want, just to throw a tantrum. And honestly that sounds just like that “it does not matter at all, that i have just eaten a box of cookies, i want another one!”

[–]TraksimussJr. Hamster Analyst 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I still remember that Amy Whoreton article 'How I learned to love my STDs" while complaining about lack of guys who would court and marry her.

[–]akihonj 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Simple response

Yes it does, it absolutely does, you've taken miles of dick and I have no interest in your broken clam shell

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

bUtT tHe pYsT iS tHe pYsT tEe hEe

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

This article is 6 years old?! Imagine how much more they will be doubling down now. I wonder what happened to the author over those 5 years

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She is 29 today. It will be interesting to see what she writes in 5-7 years from now.

[–]InevitableOwl1Swipes with a dictionary in hand 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does she mentioned her age and I missed it or did you find it elsewhere?

The most likely person I could find when trying to research her was an Aussie woman with 3m (yes million) YouTube subscribers and clear evidence of a relationship with a tall guy who doesn’t care how average she looks without makeup (from her Instagram).

Not the usual where there is no evidence of a partner in their Instagram just loads of shots of them and them partying

What perplexes me the most is that she went on this rant when she was 23. Shocking how burnt she must have got at such a young age to have to write that. It really does read as the wails of a 36 year old.

Seems to have worked out for her at the moment at least though. Although reading between the lines suggests a very high body count even at 23 which, as you suggest, may not bode well for 5-7 years time

[–]Bob_and_Virginiabeware of Shawskank Redemption 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what happened to the author over those 5 years

Probably had sex with 500 more men.

[–]Smallp0x_ 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bullshit her "sexual history has nothing to do with my relationship." I'm gonna need to see the hoefax.

[–]meeritaGlobe-trotting mansplainer 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

As a grown man, you should be able to understand that the number of people a woman has slept with 1) does not directly affect her moral character, and 2) really doesn't concern you. So, to all of the men out there who refuse to date, marry, befriend or associate themselves with a woman because of her number, grow up. Please, and thank you.

  1. Yes, it does.
  2. Yes, it does.

Another woman doesn't understand the basics: we care about your sexual history because that defines the outcome. Women are interested in men's future for selection and men on women's past.

Not for any stupid reason: the ability to pair bond is important, checking that your son is your son and not Tyrone's is important. Also, having a woman next to me who basically everyone knows how is she naked or having sex with is simply not attractive at all. I don't feel comfortable, as many men will do too.

Also, the Aphex fallacy is again on the table: women despise virgin males and love socially proofed men, me with sexual experience. A man who has options = a man whose genes are desired for reproductive options from other women, therefore that man seed is more valuable than a man who never was selected for sex.

[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You would think that women would want men who are disinterested in them to filter themselves out because of their high partner count, but not this woman. She merely does not like the consequences of her past behavior meeting up with her now that she wants to "get serious," so she gets mad at the type of man she wants to have for a commitment because he would rather choose someone else. Given trends with women and their requirements, such men have options, and would prefer a woman who does not have an extensive past.

[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If past sexual history didn't matter then we wouldn't be seeing the word "incel" used constantly. I see "incel" or "virgin" way more than slut/whore.

Make men spend their late teenage years upset that they're a virgin and it's hard to tell them that sexual history doesn't matter later in life. Men start being called virgins at a younger age than women start being called sluts/whores. They plant the sexual-history shit in our brain then complain when it grows.

[–]polishknightusaEndorsed Winged Hussar 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You made the point before me so thanks. Being an incel or a virgin is poison to male attractiveness to women even if he's otherwise a good catch. Women "virgin" shame men. In fact, I even used the fact that I had gone to a brothel to shock women in that at first they (act) offended but later are excited that I was able to get sex on my terms, when I wanted, without having to emotionally clown a woman into the sack.

That basically made me similar to chad material.

[–]NutsLikeMelons 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just because a man has never had a job, or a shower, and chose to spend his 20s playing video games does not give women the right to call him a “loser”. They should woman-up and marry him. His call of duty stats are none of your business.

Oh, hang on, is that not what women prefer? Does your opinion about your potential spouse matter? Or is it solely up to you what the deal breakers are in your life long commitments?

[–]polishknightusaEndorsed Winged Hussar 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You beat me to this point. It's nice to see other men thinking in a parallel.

Indeed, men are expected to work to be husband material even before meeting the woman. Heck, nearly all the work is on our shoulders: What they call "liberation" for her empowerment is instead for us men about building a nest. She buys a home to show her friends, we buy a home for a woman to move into. She has a fancy job to travel the world and bang hundreds of fun foreigners. We have a fancy job to build a nestegg. And we do that without "grrrl power" society helping us (but actually calling us oppressors for earning the additional 23 cents on a dollar.)

So yeah, if the ONLY thing she's bringing to "The Table" is... The Table, she had better make sure that table isn't all scratched up and stained.

[–]alexaxl 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

#CarFax CarFax.com

Let’s start this new “slang” for vehicle history. lol.

Pair bonding abilities destroyed.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Loud-Bottle-7879used to be edgy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Epic site. I’m still not sure why people don’t understand that “influencer” and “social media model” are new terms for high priced prostitutes.

[–]John_Savage69 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

#Slutfax

[–]alexaxl 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That will very soon get added to hate / banned space.

So it’s gotta be subtle and not easily removed / banner but be a metaphor.

Eg. body count is same word but implies diff in this context.

So CarFax ya/ her subtly implies a towards her history.

“Mileage”

[–]saberwarthogshow us where the Patriarchy touched you on this non-binary doll 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok, for the sake of the argument, let's say the past number doesn't count.

Then what would count would be the things that could came with that past behavior :

  • The very possible monkey branching, cheating & all around feeling that she wouldn't be exclusive and it's "just your turn"
  • The possibility of STDs (let's be honest, I really doubt she would have had protected sex every time)
  • The "Baggage" : crotch goblins, mental issues, unresolved issues with past lovers or even longing for them...
  • Now that "she's not the same anymore", "she knows her worth", "she want something serious", is the kinky funtime is over ?
    Does the guy that has to be serious & accept her past could get as much fun as those toxic exs ?

I'm thinking that if hypothetically a woman would have had a lot of "experience", but hadn't cheated / monkey branched, isn't a celibate mom, doesn't had mental issues & would treat the "serious guy" as a real lover and not an utilities, most guys won't mind the past, but I've yet to see something like this happen.

I'm open minded, but I'm not keeping my hopes too high here.

[–]One-Move 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How many times have we heard the stories of the “settled for guy” to discover, that the starfish sex he gets is not what she did for 15 years, but “that is not her style anymore”

[–]cautionTomorrow555feel your eggs rot. smell the sulphur. 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I won the lotto but spent all that money but women should still treat me the same even though I am no longer rich and can't spoil them anymore right? We would call any guy saying that delusional and stupid, but with women we are supposed to accept it.

[–]BookkeeperJazzlike44 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These types of woman will never understand this.

[–]WeRAllOnThisBlessedDJr. Hamster Analyst 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Women have been told for years that this is just the way the world works and to “get used to it.” But it's time to shift the conversation directly to the many slut-shaming men out there, some of whom do it without even realizing.

It’s not “slut shaming”. It’s called having standards. I get to choose who I allow in my life. A woman who sleeps around so easily simply cannot be trusted to maintain a stable relationship. If I spent my life opening up credit cards, racking up debt and not paying it back, my credit would be ruined and nobody would give me a loan. Same reasoning applies here.

They wanted the freedom to sleep with whoever they wanted with no societal judgment, and they got it. You’ll never see any mainstream media source shaming them into being decent women. Religion is dying a slow death, and it was one of the last things keeping this bullshit at bay. But men still have their standards.

Eventually these women will get it. They’ll be all over Instagram crying about how they’re 50 years old and can’t find a man that will commit, and hopefully the younger generations of women will see it and change their ways. Not holding my breath, but one can hope at least.

[–]John_Savage69 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Logic is patriarchy bro

[–]Ok_Management4634 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the funny thing is.. most women that are alone and post wall that can't get a man to commit do not try to tell other women they made a mistake.

Most women are incapable of admitting they made a major mistake.

So instead, they tell young women "focus on your career" "you don't need no man" etc

They want the next generation to make the same mistakes they did. Women love to ruin other women's lives. Think about how many married women have been led astray by "Friends" egging them on to have an affair because they are "missing out"

[–]throwaway63847362 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me add onto this. Its standards and preferences. Never lower either of those no matter how much you get called "asshole", "fatphobic", "racist", "school shooter" etc.

[–]otter6461a 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The standard is “we praise people for doing what’s hard.”

For most men, what’s hard is sleeping with a lot of women. Thus we often admire “players.”

For women, what’s hard is to have the restraint and self-control to not sleep with dozens/hundreds/thousands of men. So we praise low n-count women for their self-restraint.

Not really a double standard at all.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great insight. I was a wingman for a Chad for years. It was amazing how women would throw themselves at his feet. I have many stories I can print.

Ex. I have seen women walk up to him, and give him their name a phone number. I have seen this.

Ex. Stewardess at American Airlines asked him to spend a week with her in Hawaii.

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Gaelige—Béarla Translations:

  • blianta leadhbógach = "slutty years"

[–]chankletavoladora 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit is that what all those posts are written in? Shiiiiiiit.

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

That's right! And it's a damn beautiful language too!

[–]meeritaGlobe-trotting mansplainer 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't dare to pronounce it! :D

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s pronounced “ble-ant-a lag-bow-gak” if your curious (the ”ow” sound get pronounced like the “ow” in ”slow”.

[–]SnakeEyeskidthrew her a dildo then went to play Zelda 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lethal doses of salt in that article!

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like the dead sea.

[–]Mister_McDerp 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The interesting part for me is that for the longest time I agreed with the whole thing: If women are slutshamed, men should be too! Or, even better, no one gets slutshamed.

I've since changed my mind on that, and the reasoning is simple: If a man has fucked half the city, it is either because he worked very hard for it or because he has something special about him. No average or even above average man gets all the sex he wants.

If a woman has fucked half the city, she simply had to put out, without any effort whatsoever. She doesn't even need to be special, she barely needs to be average. All she needs to be is in a certain agerange, and that is a pretty big range, probably 18-35.

And subconsciously we as a society always knew that. That is why slutshaming even became a thing. We all knew that a women is the gatekeeper of sex, even if we never articulated it. Thats why we established this unwritten rule. Man has a lot of sex = "chad", women has a lot of sex = slut.

I don't agree with this 100% since there are exceptions and caveats, of course, but as a general rule it does makes sense. Of course this makes me a massive misogynist, but what else is new.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

My time as a wingman for a Chad

Chad is a lawyer and was working on USA/Russia oil business contracts in NYC. Every 2 weeks, he would fly up to NYC for a week and work with his Russian counterpart. He was doing this for 4-6 months, always the same flights. One day, a stewardess at American Airlines asked him if he would like to spend a week with her in Hawaii. He could fly on her companion fare, round trip, for $100 and split the cost of the one bedroom hotel room at $62 a night. As Chad is telling me about this, sarcastically I say,”And the problem is”. He says he knows he could get better looking women in Hawaii and bring them up to the room for sex. He didn’t want to bring them to the room while the stewardess was there. He had no doubt he could find women to have sex with, the issue was the stewardess.

Chad is out with a friend of mine. He is in his late 40’s but looks early 30’s. Two women, ages 22 and 26 have the hots for Chad. They are asking my friend about Chad to get the inside track on him. These women are topless dancers. How do we know? They said so. The end of the night, Chad gets both of their numbers.

Chad would go to singles events, not to find a GF, LTR or a possible wife, but to restock his harem. Women who go to singles everts, may be a bit older and are actively looking for a man in their life. These women are easy prey for a Chad. The best these women will be is an 8. Chad is a USDA Grade A 100% certified solid gold 10. These women think they hit the jack pot, when all he is interested in is a quick and easy lay. He would date/fuck them for a few times, but once they stared talking serious long term stuff i.e. marriage, kids, etc., he would block their phone calls and delete their numbers. Women never asked why such a good looking man in his late 30’s or early 40’s was never married or had kids. He was single, for a reason. He didn’t want to get married. Why choose one woman when he can have many? And that is exactly what he did.

Chad and I are to meet at a singles event. He is already there. I am waiting to get inside. We see each other through the doorway. There is a woman 30-32, 5’7”, wearing a woman’s business suit. If she is not the most attractive woman at the event, she is one of the more attractive women at the event. She is by herself in a corner of the room. I am planning on approaching her once inside. She starts walking, so I keep an eye on her. She walks right up to Chad. She gives him her name and phone number.

I set Chad up with a woman I know in my home owners association. Chad picks her up. She is so memorized by his looks, they don’t go out. They go to his place for sex. How do I know? Chad tells me.

Chad and I are at a C&W bar. Chad says,”Oh no. This is going to be painful. I didn’t want to run into her.” I look up to see the backside of a woman pass behind a wooden column that holds up the roof of the bar. A second later, the first thing I see emerging on the other side of the column are huge breasts, then the woman. She then turns and is walking towards us. She is 42, 5’8” 34FF, 28, 38, has a mane of blond hair piled 2-3 inches on her head, flowing over her shoulders down to her elbows. She is former Miss Sweden and has been in TV, Radio and movies. She has her own advertising company and has her own money. She is beautiful and in shape. She wants to marry Chad. Chad wants no part of it.

I worked at GE as a field service engineer. I would get a new car when my old one hit 60K miles. I am talking to Chad on his purchase of a new Ford Explorer. He mentions he bought it at a certain dealership. He said his salesperson was a woman about 25. She was below average in looks but had huge breasts. Her breasts made milk, even though she was not pregnant. She had a hormone imbalance and they made milk all the time. He would go to her apartment 2-3 times a week to drain her breasts, and she would drain his balls. I later realized the dealership he bought his Explorer was the same dealership that I was to get my new company car. I go to the dealership showroom floor and there she was. She is wearing a shirt 4-5 times bigger than her normal size. Her breasts were pineapple size almost down to her waist. She looked as he described her. Maybe a 5 for the face, so so on the body.

Chad and I are at a C&W bar. A girl asks me to dance with her girlfriend. After dancing with her, I ask the girl if she would like to dance with my friend (Chad). When she meets Chad, her eyes go wide open. Her head tilts to her right, she is grinning from ear to ear with her tongue hanging out the right side of her mouth with both of her hands balled up under her chin as she is staring up to him with goo goo eyes. She made a fool out of herself. We are talking about a 42 year old woman, not a 12 year old girl. I look at her, then at him, then straight ahead and think WTF is going on here. But this is how women responded around him. He was like catnip to women. They would lose their minds and act stupid. Chad gets her number, they go to his home a few days later. There is a hot tub outside. They climb in, but she says no to sex. This is on a Tuesday night, but she says call me Thursday. Thursday night they have sex in the hot tub. BTW She was the regional director of Balley’s President and First Lady Health Clubs. She visits various clubs, in various states, to make sure they are clean and maintained. Thus, this was going to be a ONS for her. She would never see him again. But a good man, he will have to prove himself worthy of her. WTF?

The Russian lawyer he was working with on oil contracts was a 27 year old woman. She was blonde and average in looks and body. He showed me a photo of her. He tell tells me she stayed with him the final month before the contracts were signed in NYC. He was 52 at the time, she 27. He only has one bed in his home. Where do you think she slept?

To summarize: Chad brings his dick, Beta brings his paycheck to prove he is worthy.

[–]daddysgotanew 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. And people think those men don’t exist

[–]polishknightusaEndorsed Winged Hussar 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's another way of putting it, and a story.

A Russian woman friend of ours, looks like Barbie, married a good looking guy but he can't earn a living. During their troubled married, he went off for a night with the boys to a strip club and she shoved $300 into skanky women's G strings and for lap dances.

She was not pleased. She and their daughters stayed with us for a week out of anger.

So here he was taking resources that she had considered belonged to her family and shoving them into skanky women's lingerie. I understand. I regularly tell my wife this when she complains about me "Do you want that other guy?" and she smiles, THINKS for a second, and laughs and says "no."

But she has to think.

Women have to make that effort to think like my 5 year old is learning at school how to sit down and listen to lessons.

A woman who goes up to Chads and sleeps with them is not providing her future beta bucks with value. My wife at least had the decency to show me appreciation and affection and love without me having to flash a lot of money around. Such women who sleep with chads don't even bring a table to the dinner.

[–]UhBallsDontTalkBack 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

You post your wingman story a lot (not that I'm complaining) this is like my fifth time reading it.

Edit: i should mention, there's a bit more information this time around and a rather enjoy the retelling...I'll...I'll shut up now.

[–]mustangfrankCopy-paste Commando 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I repost if the article by an OP merits posting. There are always new guys coming here and reading for the first time. This post is for them. Also, some people don't believe Chads exist. I have known 3, but only seen 2 in action.

[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thing with "slut shaming" men is that it really does not happen. Women could very well choose to start shaming men who sleep around a lot, but they do not want to do so. With the exception of women who would reject a man who slept around for moral reasons, most women do not see a man having a high partner count as undesirable. Rather, he is able to sleep with so many women because he is desirable.

The real problem is that women do not like it when they get penalized for "sleeping around like a man." This notion is mistaken, as they lack the awareness of the fact that a man being able to get numerous sexual partners has to be exceptional, while a woman can get the same number merely by her presence alone. These women want there not to be consequences for sleeping with many men before deciding to "settle down," but they cannot compel men to commit to them no matter how much they protest how "unfair" this is.

Consider this: have you ever encountered a case where a woman who chose to not have sex unless she was married complain about how "men get to sleep around with no consequences?" It is only slutty women who have this complaint, as they fail to account for the differing roles and preferences that men and women have. Many men do not want to commit to a slut, and sluts hate that fact. But nothing, and I mean nothing, is stopping a woman from holding men to the same standards of not wanting to commit to a man who has slept around. That is, nothing but herself.

[–]Wide-Illustrator2906 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She doesn't even need to be special, she barely needs to be average. All she needs to be is in a certain agerange, and that is a pretty big range, probably 18-35.

Honestly, she can be below average and over 35 and still sleep with half the city.

[–]DS_1900 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow this article was terrible.

Sometimes you make better progress in life by just shutting the fuck up...

[–]roaringstuff 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You can try justify being a slut all you want, but theres always consequences. Just ask lana rhodes crying about all the money she made whoring herself.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Who's Lana Rhodes?

[–]bouncedeck 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Porn girl who did some next level gross stuff.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh.

[–]Bob_and_Virginiabeware of Shawskank Redemption 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't act all innocent with us, bro. Hahaha! Just ribbing ya.

[–]LokisDawn 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But no one on this earth has the right to hold your decisions against you.

Pretty sure decisions are just about the only thing we can hold against people. We don't, generally, blame people for accidents. But if you make a decision, you can be judged.

I don't wanna Godwin this, but I gotta. Imagine if that was Eichmann, defending himself instead of with the categorical imperativ, with: "No one on this earth has the right to hold my decisions against me."

[–]logan4179 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Some guys seem to think they have the right to judge a woman's character based solely off of how many people she has slept with. Don't mind that these same guys have slept with the entire cast of "90210" ... because that's different, right?"

How about: "Some women seem to think they have the right to judge a man based solely off his height/money. Don't mind that these same women aren't particularly tall/wealthy...because that's different, right?"

All this dumbass has done is caught a preference that differs between the sexes and she assumes these contradictions only apply to men.

[–]bgovern 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But no one on this earth has the right to hold your decisions against you.

Actually, that is how basically everyone judges everyone else. Your past decisions are a good indicator of what your future decisions will be.

[–]polishknightusaEndorsed Winged Hussar 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed, how can we judge anyone at all if not from their past? ANYONE can say they'll do good things in the future. There's even an old joke on Popeye: "I'll happily pay you for a burger Thursday that you give me today."

[–]SlyPogona 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whenever I opened up about my sexual history has only brought problems, from the usual jealousy to the downright "you're disgusting" Women expect YOU to be a saint, while you're forbidden to judge them

[–]kapriece 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell me you hit the wall without telling me you hit the wall. Single women leading others down the same path. They want you to conquer the world,.make all this money, be loyal, and bring it all to them so they can sit on their ass. You get used up CC jockeys mad that because we don't pick them. To make matters worse they act like they have some sort of power in this area. "Grow up, Man up. Be a man"......I'm so tired of hearing this.

Last time I checked only toddlers put everything in their mouth and get mad when you stop them. My kids are grown.

[–]John_Savage69 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But no one on this earth has the right to hold your decisions against you.

What fucking drug is she on? Your own voluntary decisions are what define you and your character. You are the sum total of the decisions you make. If I am going to consider a LTR with someone, I sure as shit want to know the types of decisions she has made. Not only are they indicative of moral character but also evidence of propensity for risk-taking behavior, trustworthiness, and impulse control.

[–]noobie107Koalaty man 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Some guys seem to think they have the right to judge a woman's character based solely off of how many people she has slept with.

my body my choice. *click*

[–]One-Move 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My wallet my choice

[–]_wrong_ad_ 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“No one on this earth has a right to hold your decisions against you”

That’s 100%, ass backwards wrong. Your decisions are what define you. That is ultimately the only thing upon which people can judge you.

[–]reignoferror00 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Setting aside the numbers and assuming she has no STI's that can't be cured, it is the habit and mindset that won't change that is the issue. Think she'll continue having frequent and enthusiastic sex when it is just the "same you" year after year instead of a different and exciting Chad she just met? Aside from the sex (though that is a big one), she'll very likely also create drama for no good reason - just for her excitement. Always more concerned with chasing the next thrill instead of helping build and appreciating what she has at home.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™[M] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Setting aside the numbers and assuming she has no STI's that can't be cured,

Why would you set aside these important issues?

Are you afraid to have preferences and standards?

You are 100% allowed to reject a woman for any (or no) reason. Including her past.

it is the habit and mindset that won't change that is the issue.

Yes, this too is an issue. But her past is itself a major issue, even if she'll be the best wifey ever.

[–]reignoferror00 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Instead of setting aside rephrase it as in addition to then. Was on a work break (like I am now) and probably didn't take enough time to word things precisely enough.

I just said "setting aside" as sort of another way of saying "not to get into the blatantly obvious in your face things".

The biggest part of her past being a major issue is how it shaped how she is now and how she will likely be in the future. You may be blind to how she really is now (or she'll hide it somewhat by limiting speech and behaviour) but dollars to donuts it will become more and more apparent in the future.

Woman that think they'll suddenly be able to really change their behaviour and attitude for anything other than very short term (without a LOT of self reflection and hard work) are like someone thinking that you switch to Drive into Reverse when you're speeding along and everything will work out hunky-dory, or smokers that think they can quit cold turkey first try with no problem.

[–]MediocreSupermarket5 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s just a preference girlie. Tee hee.

[–]Jihocech_Honza 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I once read an article about hunting in Africa. There was this gentleman who travelled to Kenya every year for his vacation. He bought a permission to shoot an elephant. But he wanted only the one with tusks over 100 pound. If they didn ´t find such animal, he just enjoyed his time in Africa and returned the next year for another try.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How is your point relevant here?

[–]Jihocech_Honza 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not your duty to accept whatever elephant you meet.

[–]NeldotJr. Hamster Analyst con una barriera linguistica 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

As a grown man, you should be able to understand that the number of people a woman has slept with 1) does not directly affect her moral character, and

Wrong. It affects her moral character because it's a strong mark pointing out her poor choices of male partners and/or her unwillingness to commit in longterm relationships.

2) really doesn't concern you.

Wrong. It does concern me because of the above. It also concerns me because of the scientifically proven damage to the capacity of pair bonding that a woman suffers when she has too many relationships instead of focusing on a few, but important, ones.

So, to all of the men out there who refuse to date, marry, befriend or associate themselves with a woman because of her number, grow up. Please, and thank you.

I did. I grew up, and this is exactly why I can afford to be very demanding about what I want in a woman and discard them because of their high partners numbers.

[–]programwithhf 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexual history does matter because the more people a woman sleeps with. The more likely she will cheat on you.

[–]Balefirez 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah, another article telling men that they just have to accept something that a woman chooses to do. You don’t HAVE to sleep with all those guys. That was something you CHOSE to do. Actions have consequences. The fact that you don’t like that doesn’t make it go away. Also, gotta love the hypocrisy of judging men then turning around and telling them they can’t judge you. Stay classy.

[–]throwaway63847362 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love it when men say that women have to accept whst their standards and preferences are and watching heads explode as women try to change those men and it doesnt work cause those men stood their ground. The ol "im not his type but hes my type and im going to try and shame him into me being his type"

[–]Cristoff13Sr. Hamster Analyst 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Problems often seem to arise when a guy finds his sweet but sexually inhibited partner was promiscuous and uninhibited in her past - and she's done her best to hide this from him. Then it might seem justified holding her past against her.

Why is he getting the low libido version of her instead of the more exciting past version? But of course she rationalises this away. And other women will back her up, saying how dare he expects anything from her now based purely on her past.

[–]GaiinahatJr. Hamster Analyst 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There's a lot to unpack here, so let's get started...

Part 1

"It has come to my attention lately that men are somehow still (in 2016) uncomfortable, turned off and even disgusted by a woman's sexual history. I'm sure you know the kind of guy I am talking about. The one who becomes immediately uninterested in a woman simply because her “number” is too high."

It's not that men are not interested. It's that men are not interested in turning hoes into housewives. Sure, men will let her have a bit of fun, because at the end of the night they're just another notch in her belt. No feelings, no ability to pair-bond, just another ride on the CC. These are the type of women men aren't interested in marrying, because they can't connect with men on an emotional level.

"Some guys seem to think they have the right to judge a woman's character based solely off of how many people she has slept with. Don't mind that these same guys have slept with the entire cast of "90210" ... because that's different, right?"

Absolutely men have the right to judge a woman's character based on how many rides on the CC she's taken. It means the difference between her being suitable for a long-term relationship, or suitable only for a smash-and-dash for the reasons stated above. Also, men who have slept with many women are more desirable to women. Women are fiercely competitive with each other when it comes to out-doing each other in order to be the alpha's mate. Men know this. They're not stupid.

"We've all heard it: “Oh, dude. If she's slept with that many people, she must have daddy issues,” or the classic, “You really shouldn't trust a girl who's slept with that many guys. She'll for sure cheat on you.”"

Correct on both counts. Just because you choose to dismiss these words of warning among men, doesn't mean it isn't the truth. I noticed you didn't say any of that wasn't true, because you know from experience what gets said when men find out that you're damaged goods beyond repair.

"This kind of behavior by men conditions women into thinking their past sexual experiences are somehow wrong, and this can really take a toll on a woman's self-worth and self-esteem. So much so that a large number of women feel the need to lie about their past to a potential lover or partner."

If a woman doesn't want to feel ashamed for being a slut, perhaps she could save herself the blows to her self-esteem by not being a slut. Also, if a woman has such a high body count she feels ashamed about it, and willingly lies about it, that especially makes her unfit to be a in a long-term relationship. Any relationship, especially a marriage, needs to be built on a foundation of honesty and trust, not lies and deceit.

"Women have been told for years that this is just the way the world works and to “get used to it.” But it's time to shift the conversation directly to the many slut-shaming men out there, some of whom do it without even realizing."

As was true for thousands of years, it is still true today. Men are biologically wired to despise the impurity of a slut. Just like women are biologically despised by men who they deem are incapable of protecting and providing for them and their children. The gate swings both ways. Men can accept this truth. Women who refuse to accept reality often find themselves at the end of their lives broken and alone.

"Let me tell you something a friend once said to me that really stuck: A woman's life is not practice for being your wife. Just think about that one for a second. A woman does not (and rightfully should not) have to stop and think, “Hmmm, will my future partner approve of this, or will he think I'm a slut?” before every single sexual encounter. If men don't live in fear of being called a slut for sleeping around, then why should we? If we want to let our freak flag fly, who's to stop us? News flash: It's not you."

Men don't care if women want to live the life of a slut or not. Nobody has claimed women aren't free to do what they want and sleep around with as many men as they want. If women want to fly the freak flags, nobody is stopping them. Women are grown adults and can make their own decisions. However, bad decisions lead to consequences. If woman chooses to be a slut, she chooses to forsake the life of being a wife. Slut and wife are on completely opposite sides of the spectrum. There is no in between. Women cannot have their cake and eat it too.

"Women are not going to limit themselves simply because one day some insecure little boy might be uncomfortable about the realities of sex. Sorry, but it just doesn't work that way. What did you expect? For her to sit around knitting, waiting for you to come along to explore herself and her sexuality? All the while, you're out there "scoring" left and right? F\ck no."*

Once again, women are free to do whatever they want, and no amount of man-shaming you throw at them is going to make the truth go away. Your jealousy and envy of the opposite sex doesn't change the reality of how the biology of men and women are different. But hey, if you want to go out there and act like a man, don't expect a man to want you. Men don't want women that act like men. Men want women who act like women, you know, like those who sit around knitting and learning other useful wifely skills like that.

[–]GaiinahatJr. Hamster Analyst 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Part 2

"I'm sorry to crush all of your boyish dreams, but a woman's sex drive doesn't just miraculously appear the first time she lays eyes on you. Odds are she had a life (and sex life) before you, and if you hold onto this slut-shaming frame of mind, she'll sure as hell have one after you."

It's perfectly fine for a woman to have had a life and a sex life previously. These days, it's pretty much expected. However, when a woman has ridden so many men that it feels like having sex with a bucket of water, it doesn't matter if men slut shame her or keep their mouths shut. She is what she is, and it won't be long before she's off for the next ride. That's the thing about sluts. Even if men wanted them to settle down, sluts are so psychologically damaged, it's not even possible for them to settle down.

"As a woman, I know firsthand just how hard it can be to feel completely comfortable in your own skin. I also know just how much damage that four letter word can do … slut."

As the old saying goes, if the shoe fits... If you can't handle the consequences of being a slut, you shouldn't have become a slut. What sucks for you, is that there is no going back. You made your bed, and now you have no choice but to lie in it. You wanted to act like a man, now you have to suffer for it like a man. There are no take-backsies in this life. Maybe you'll get lucky and come to your senses in the next one.

"Everyone has made mistakes, and I'm sure we've all kissed a few frogs along the way. But no one on this earth has the right to hold your decisions against you. It is important for every woman to realize that no matter how ashamed someone tries to make you feel about your past. Without it, you wouldn't be the bad\ss bitch you are today."*

There's a difference between kissing a few frogs along the way and shagging every fricking thing in the pond. Also, men have every right to hold your decisions to sleep with anything walking around with three legs against you. Your decisions, when you come into a man's circle, affect that man directly, whether it be his reputation, his ability to work with certain people, or even go to church. Men know that everything of theirs that a slut touches, will turn to rot. Men aren't willing to suffer the consequences of a slut's bad decisions. Your crabs-in-a-bucket mentality is doing more harm to women than good. As I said before, men don't want women who act like men, or as you put it, badass bitches. Instead of turning your experiences into a chance to save other women from the same fate you've suffered, you decided to double down and tell them it's okay to be sluts, just so that you don't have to suffer in misery alone.

"And men, you need to step back and realize just how much harm can come from this kind of slut-shaming. Trying to control a woman's sexuality is another form of policing her freedom. It is up to each woman to decide who she does or does not want to sleep with, and when a man tries to judge her, it only speaks to that man's character (FYI, you look like a dick)."

Men don't care about the harm slut-shaming can cause women who are sluts. Men don't think that way. Men see things as they are, and react accordingly. If men see a slut, they're not going to point at her and talk about what a virtuous woman she is just to save her feelings. They're going to call her out and say she's a slut, and is not suitable for a long-term relationship, even if it makes them look like a dick. A spade is a spade and there's no amount of sugar you can put on top to make it not a spade. Also, nobody is policing her freedom. She is completely free to suck and ride and get slammed in every one her holes all she wants. Men don't care what she does, and have no interest in trying to control her anything. It's her choice. If she can't handle the consequences of her choices, then she should have been making better choices in the first place.

"As a grown man, you should be able to understand that the number of people a woman has slept with 1) does not directly affect her moral character, and 2) really doesn't concern you."

That depends on how she presents herself. If she's honest and outright doesn't try to hide the fact she's a slut, men neither care about her moral character, nor about how many people she's slept with. Men will respect her honesty, even if it makes her look bad. However, if she's deceitful, and lies, and tries to present herself as some kind pure and delicate flower, that automatically calls into question her moral character, and if she's trying to con men into having a relationship, damn straight how many bodies trailing behind her is of every concern to them.

"So, to all of the men out there who refuse to date, marry, befriend or associate themselves with a woman because of her number, grow up. Please, and thank you."

You don't get to make that decision, men do. Your man-shaming tactics can't change a man's biology, or his preferences. If men don't want to date, marry, befriend, or associate with a woman because she lacks the self control to keep her legs crossed, that's their choice. You don't get to sit there and tell men not to judge you just because you spread eagle at every Chad, Dick, and Tyrone, and then turn around and try to shame them because they wouldn't touch your rotten crotch with a ten-foot pole. That's not how the world works, and you're just going to have to get used to it.

You're welcome.

[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trying to control a woman's sexuality is another form of policing her freedom. It is up to each woman to decide who she does or does not want to sleep with, and when a man tries to judge her, it only speaks to that man's character (FYI, you look like a dick).

If a man is going to commit to a woman (especially with marriage), you are damn right he will be "controlling her sexuality" as well as "policing her freedom!" Yes, other men are not going to have a say in this, but from what I am seeing with the rest of the article, she is mad about men refusing to commit to a slut. A big part of commitment is indeed sacrificing any and all freedom to sleep around with anyone else. Otherwise, the commitment is meaningless.

Therefore, a woman is going to have to accept the terms of her sexuality being limited to one man if she is going to have any expectation that he commit to her. And if he chooses to have this policy apply retroactively, it is his right to do so. Too bad if you slept around with other men and do not like that he refuses to commit to you because of that. He has no obligation to start a commitment with a woman for whatever reason he chooses, including the number of men she slept with before.

[–]FatherUnbannable 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't get the "it's fine when men do it right?!" argument.

It's only fone if she thinks it's fine, as ultimately it's her choice who she accepts as a partner. So if she wants to filter men on their number that's a perfectly legitimate criteria. Him being a slut certainly says more about their future relationship than his height or how many diplomas he has.

Everyone can set criterias however they want, it's the fairest part of the dating market.

[–]MegaHashes 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Odds are she had a life (and sex life) before you, and if you hold onto this slut-shaming frame of mind, she'll sure as hell have one after you.

It’s kinda funny/ironic that she first acknowledges men immediately lose relationship interest in a woman that treats her body like an Uber, but then later writes as if men are the one experiencing the loss when she moves on from our collective — disinterest? Like, okay, hoes gonna hoe. I’m not mad that you won’t (or continue to) have sex with me and then will move onto other men once I understand that’s who you really are.

What we get mad about is this born again virgin bullshit where you act like every new relationship/partner doesn’t have a cumulative effect on you. Only, once we start digging into your mysterious past it’s like fucking India Jones and the Temple of Doom where we find a village of missing men have been inside your vagina.

To continue with the car analogy, I’d rather have a well maintained, one owner ride with some miles on it, than a ride that claims to have low miles, but has also had half the Raven’s Offense take it for a test drive. No thanks. Sorry, not sorry. Go ahead and move on, it’s probably the other half of the teams turn now.

This article is just more of peddling the idea that women should have consequence free choices in life. I’m worth more than what you are offering. I value my body more than being just another notch on your dildo. Pussy is not in short supply in the world. Women anyone else but America don’t have these ridiculous attitudes.

[–]Extracrispyrooster 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct because there won't be one.

[–]PapaDragonHH 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol nobody is stopping her from whoring around.

But the same way she can do whatever she wants, men can do so too, and they can decide to reject women who have slept with too many guys. Its pretty simple.

[–]Ok_Management4634 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yep, a CC rider that now wants to end her "wild phase", probably well over 30, and finding no takers.. Must be men's fault, it can't possibly be a consequence of her own decision.

And again, how come men can't have their own grocery list of things they want?

If women can have a list of 30 requirements, why can't men just say "I don't want a woman with the 1000 cock stare"?

[–]omegajelly200Locked, Stocked, and 2 Smoking Backhands 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The same ol same ol "B-b-b-b-but guys do it too!"

Actually no. That's apex fallacy thinking at its finest. They only see the Mega Uber Chads who spin plates and have a rotation of booty calls on speed dials, but assume that all guys are like that.

Nope, 90% of guys aren't like that at all.

[–]user84893093748959Jr. Hamster Analyst 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The entire logic of the article's theme is that men and women are the same.

TRUTH: Men and women are not the same; men and women are different.

The article is so telling in many aspects. I believe the article was written more for the ears of women to embolden them to sleep around more, lie about their sexual past, and attempt to shame others for "slut shaming".

Men: you are not "slut shaming". You are simply making reasonable and rational judgements and decisions about your life. Quietly take note, choose your path, and move on.

[–]AldabruzzoNo busted Pillsbury biscuit cans 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Once again:

If you, woman, are demanding commitment from me, then anything and everything about you is my business.

If you want my commitment, then "my business" is whatever the fuck I decide it is.

If you are demanding commitment from me, then I get to know whatever the fuck I want to know about you, and I have the right to find it out by any means necessary.

If you want a lifetime legal claim on my money, time, attention, and resources, then your past - and anything else I want to know about you - is very much my business.

You don't get to decide what affects me. I get to decide what affects me.

Just think about that one for a second. A woman does not (and rightfully should not) have to stop and think, “Hmmm, will my future partner approve of this, or will he think I'm a slut?” before every single sexual encounter. If men don't live in fear of being called a slut for sleeping around, then why should we? If we want to let our freak flag fly, who's to stop us? News flash: It's not you.

I get to apply whatever criteria I want to you. I get to draw whatever conclusions I want to about you.

Men can sleep around with fewer consequences because WE ARE DIFFERENT FROM WOMEN. Men and women are different. Women can't sleep around like men can because THEY ARE NOT MEN.

I also know just how much damage that four letter word can do … slut.

Sleep around all you want. And then live with the consequences.

But no one on this earth has the right to hold your decisions against you.

If you're demanding my commitment, money, time, attention, and resources, I can "hold against you" whatever the fuck I want. If you don't want me "holding anything against you", then don't demand my commitment, time, money, attention, and resources.

And men, you need to step back and realize just how much harm can come from this kind of slut-shaming.

Fuck right off. I, not you, will decide what I need to do. It's the sleeping around, not the "slut shaming", that is causing these women harm.

[–]One-Move 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the SLUT thing was of your choice, the SHORT was not of my doing

[–]V_MKilodick Converter 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The most interesting part of the article is where its a great steaming pile of word salad but nowhere does it ever incorrectly claim the guy is wrong. Just endlessly going on about how he's evil and whatever women do is the definition of correct and there's no right and wrong other than women are right.

You'd be really mad if you hired this character as a lawyer and the closing argument was "true, the other side is not wrong, but you suck, so there, I called you a poopy-pants which means I'm right because I said so!"

Its two pages that boil down to, yeah the guys are correct but they're bad people for noticing.

[–]oxyoxyboi 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course we don’t want to pork rotten meat

[–]p3ngwinStreet HoeTel Manager 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

why am i getting denied this page on Chrome and FF because "it's not secure" ? I can't even use the "let me in anyway" option anymore as it's not there o.O

​

This site can’t provide a secure connectionarchive.ph uses an unsupported protocol.

ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH

[–]Ok_Management4634 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

try the brave browser

[–]p3ngwinStreet HoeTel Manager 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather find out why Archive pages aren't working on two browsers.

[–]Seagram7Jr. Hamster Analyst 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's fucking glorious in a sick and twisted way. These roasties, most of them, were absolutely beautiful as teenagers and 20-somethings. I can tell from her face that 10 years ago she must of been hot and experienced tons of positive attention.

Always convinced someone better is out there along with hard parting with booze and drugs. Now she is older and her looks wane and they all begin to realize the errors of their ways.

When women are young, under 25 or so, they get attention from high value males who are attractive and give them tingles. However, these "alpha males" know that they have options and are not interested in committing. Regardless, these women then spend their twenties spreading their legs for these guys without getting commitment in return until they end up in their late 20s still unmarried because no man who is husband material is willing to marry a worn out 28 year old woman with all the baggage that comes with riding the cock carousel for years when he can instead marry a 22 year old with an n-count close to zero.

You may think that these women are "homely" but that's only because the cock carousel isn't open to them anymore.

I've witnessed this with my own eyes--women who are extremely attractive in their early twenties and are used to getting hit on by guys who are 9's and 10's. They just think that being desired by attractive guys is how their life is because it's all they have ever known. Then, as they approach their thirties, it often takes a while before these women realize that those top-tier men are no longer an option and they instead need to settle for a guy who is a 5 or 6. The ones who do realize it early enough will often delete all their social media and try to erase any evidence of them being a slut so that they can trick some poor naive guy into wifing them up before it's too late

[–]88Double 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want to enjoy the “hoe phase” please go ahead, enjoy. But that doesn’t mean that the guy you finally want to stay with long term has to accept it or want to “wife” you. Nobody wants a wife/girl who has been with loads of men

[–]Admirable_Bee_87142 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What this chick fails to understand is that there is a difference between women you fuck and women you wife up. Those are two different things. The free spirit woman is one who is good for a short time - fuck and release. Beyond that she is a bad bet to be a decent partner, wife, mother etc.

[–]Fine_Measurement79682 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do you guys feel as if they truly desire to brag about their numbers? As if they wanna act like guys. We have to earn it, for them literally falls off the sky! Is not the same!

[–]_Genghis_John_ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What's with all the Gaelic in this subreddit? Are there just a lot of Irish people here?

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The Gaelige in my titles makes my posts unique and stands out from others. There’s also the bonus of allowing me to get away with harsher insults that would attract unwanted attention from the sub’s detractors.

[–]Land_of_the_Losersthe-niceguy.com 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hiding your insults in other languages is only something that a 坏蛋 would do.

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I never said I was a good person!

[–]watgm234 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You really think someone who likes sleeping around with different people won’t get bored in a monogamous relationship? Cope with your life choices lol

[–]amongthemaniacs 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just think about that one for a second. A woman does not (and rightfully should not) have to stop and think, “Hmmm, will my future partner approve of this, or will he think I'm a slut?” before every single sexual encounter.

She's basically saying "Why do men have to judge me for my promiscuity? Why can't they just like me for who I am?" But you could easily rephrase that question for any undesirable trait you might have. "Why do men/women judge me for my weight/looks/personality/not having a job/not having money, etc.?" The answer is because people have standards.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]lurkerhasarisenA Strategist Among Tacticians 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't matter to you... and that is your prerogative. If you marry with that attitude I highly recommend that you put your assets into a trust and have a good divorce lawyer on speed-dial, though.

Divorce risk directly correlates with prior sexual experience.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’ve never asked or cared to ask about a women’s sexual history and don’t care to share any details about mine. It’s 100% not relevant.

Ah, you still believe in equality. I see.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve never asked or cared to ask about a women’s sexual history and don’t care to share any details about mine. It’s 100% not relevant.

If you're just fuck buddies, then yeah, it doesn't matter.

If you're committing (ostensibly for the rest of your lives), everything matters.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter