I see a lot of proposals on this sub for socially/government-enforced nuclear families forcing people to breed and even taking women's jobs away to make them sit at home and breed all day (despite 74% of healthcare workers being women)

First of all, child abuse is something that frequently occurs when people have unwanted children, or children they can't afford. As a childcare worker, I worked at a community college in an urban area where people who were low-income and teen moms would get high-quality childcare. These children often had messed up lives and their parents frequently regretted having them. A lot of these parents also seemed to have very low iqs (Not saying that to be rude, saying that as an objective statement)

Now, I've looked extensively at online childfree forums for the reasons people don't have kids. Instead of them being "girl bosses who care more about being a corporate slave" a HUGE amount of them are traumatized. There's a lot of childhood trauma and baggage on the childfree sub, as well as a lot of them have mental illness and can't handle loud noises. A lot of them are actually anti-capitalist and don't want to work. Ironically enough, it backfires with forced procreation because it makes people traumatize their own kids out of having any.

Now I think the most ironic part is the fact we often say "Force women to breed as young as possible in order to raise the birth rate!" yet then whenever there's someone out there like Casey Anthony or Pearl Fernandez, the comment sections are like "Why didn't they just not have kids!!!". Yet I see right wing people pushing for bans on contraception and sterilizations so the state can get into people's personal beeswax. And I even understand pro-life/abortion bans as someone who believes all life is sacred. But an egg....?