I saw a post a few days ago where this guy was arguing that men are literally less attractive than women *objectively*. The data he used to support this is that women rate men lower in attractiveness than men rate women and I see this circulated a lot here.

Here's some reality: women's physical attraction is tied in with lots of other variables. So if you line up nameless men, of course women are going to rate them lower on average. They want to see a personality, values, interests, behavior, etc. associated to that body and dick. That isn't to say that women don't value hot men, it's that their attraction (at least initially) is more diverse. And that doesn't mean that men are less beautiful.

It's honestly like you idiots have never actually talked to or dated women. I totally agree that women have an easier time getting dates/matches, but the reality is that they have a completely different lens with which they look at the world, so it's just not a 1 to 1 comparison.

One of the biggest problems with "equality/feminism" is that it has made us directly compare men and women as if we perceive the world the same way, and if things aren't 50/50 in every way, something needs to be changed. That's just not how the world works.

At the end of the day, it's also hard for women to find someone she really loves and wants to be with. In general, women have less sexual partners than men. Honestly I don't think I've ever dated a woman who had more sexual partners than me. And that's not because she couldn't, it's because she wasn't interested. She wanted to go for the few she really liked. While # of partners is important for male security, it isn't for women because they are playing a completely different game.

Trust me, women find men hot. Our species would not work if that wasn't the case.