TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

The fact that this case is so open-shut and people still support Kesha shows we have a long way to go

p_u_n_k

February 23, 2016
653 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.people.com/article/kesha-trial-not-released-dr-luke-recording-contract
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The fact that this case is so open-shut and people still support Kesha shows we have a long way to go
Author

p_u_n_k

Upvotes 653
Comments 213
Date February 23, 2016 4:41 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/477f1f/the_fact_that_this_case_is_so_openshut_and_people/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-fact-that-this-case-is-so-open-shut-and-people.955506
https://theredarchive.com/post/955506
Top posts by p_u_n_k

Woman accuses her husband of molesting her daughter

438 upvotes
February 24, 2016
/r/PussyPassDenied

Where are the feminists crying rape?

6 upvotes
January 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

the risk of being a father

1 upvotes
February 24, 2016
/r/MensRights

Daily Mail posts this video as a joke but imagine the reaction of the genders were flipped

1 upvotes
May 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 179 points180 points181 points 10 years ago (70 children) | Copy Link

But these are two separate cases. One is about a contract and another should be a criminal case of rape. as far as the contract litigation goes, the judge is right. Anyone of average intelligence would ask what her problem is. The record company and Dr. Luke told her she can go ahead and record music and tour, whatever. And she is crying? She signed a legal contract, now she wants out of it? Has anyone asked if she falsely accused the guy of this harassment in order to get out of a record contract that she thinks is less beneficial to her now that she is famous?

[–]MasZakrY 115 points116 points117 points 10 years ago (65 children) | Copy Link

Kesha swore under oath in 2011 deposition that Dr. Luke did NOT sexually abuse her. She wants out of the contract and will and has done anything to do so. "Dr. Luke" has been dragged through the mud and has publicly stated many not-so-nice things about him.

Even mentioned was notes of "emotional damage". Him fat shaming her isn't even on the docket and has nothing to do with this case.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

exactly. I don't say this to be controversial but because it is true. And It is true because we can see it happening. Women, specifically feminists claim to be these strong, blah blah blah, but whenever it benefits them, they drag out the weak "he hurt me" stuff. I don't get how people can be so hypocritical and live with themselves.

[–]bobbage 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

And this is the core of the matter, it really doesn't matter whether he raped her or not. That's a private criminal matter between her and him (which she is notably not pressing).

If it did happen, that's for her to press criminal charges against him.

But Sony didn't rape her, so even if it did happen that is not a good argument for her to break her contract. As the judge said, it would make a mockery of contract law in this country.

Why should Sony be negatively impacted by something that happened (or didn't happen) in her private life? It's bullshit.

[–]elebrin 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If it did happen, that's for her to press criminal charges against him.

If I remember correctly, then criminal charges are always brought by the state rather than an individual. If a DA thought they had enough evidence to get a conviction, there'd be a trial.

[–]vowell1055 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is true, and I hate when people talk about someone "pressing charges" (way too much television), but it should also be pointed out that, if a victim refuses to cooperate with an investigation, it's very difficult (though not impossible) to get a conviction. Ends up kind of being the same thing.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

A crime actually has to be reported before a DA can bring charges. It's not enough for there to simply be evidence of something, somewhere. But you're right, the correct phrasing is that she should have reported the crime if it really happened. That's what people usually mean.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

well, when it comes to rape, I don't know that she has the power to determine if charges are filed does she? If there is sufficient evidence the police are obligated to arrest the guy despite what she says, right? So that would tell me there is no evidence, therefore couldn't be used to break a contract. What happened was, she was young and a nobody. She signed a shitty contract and now that she is a "star" she wants out of it.

[–]bobbage 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's irrelevant if she was raped or not, Sony didn't rape her. She had a contract with Sony that she is trying to get out of and even if she was raped in her private life that's her own problem, not Sony's.

Imagine you are raped in your own home... that sucks, but you can't then go to your landlord and say "I was raped, I don't have to pay my tent anymore". The two are completely different issues and completely different areas of law. Typical feminist logic.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I understand how it works. But it does matter as in it goes to show her character that she would misuse an importantly horrible tragedy some women suffer to shame him into letting her out of a contract she signed. I can hear her now "let me out of this deal or I will say you assaulted me." now she claims she was coerced into saying he didn't drug and assault her ion the depositions. After watching them, there is no way she is lying. She would be the best actress ever. However, her mom does look like she wants to say yes, but has to say no. for whatever reason.

[–]ICritMyPants 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists find a way.

Usually by taking the best possible stance for themselves in that particular situation, e.g. being weak or strong depending on what benefits them most.

[–]Fwob 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't be surprised to see a defamation suit.

[–]Boehemyth 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unless it is part of a counter suit for the negotiating table, I would. Defamation cases are extremely hard to win because the things you have to prove, such as malicious intent, even by a preponderance of evidence burden, are empirically difficult to demonstrate if it can't be absolutely clear they were outright lies.

[–]Fwob 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She said in court it never happened, and is now saying it did. Seems like good evidence of some lying going on somewhere.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I was trying to prove that I did not rape someone and they were defaming me, a video of them saying under oath that I never raped them would as good as it gets.

[–]EnderVViggen 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Just for my personal info, would you mind pointing me in the right direction of this 2011 deposition of Kesah RE: Dr. Luke not sexually abusing her?

[–]pluvoaz 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't find a link to the actual deposition, but here are a few stories that mention it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a TMZ story and some of the relevant video:

http://www.tmz.com/2016/02/23/kesha-dr-luke-sexual-assault-rape-drugs-deposition-video/

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Kesha swore under oath in 2011 deposition that Dr. Luke did NOT sexually abuse her

That was five years ago. It may well have been true then. That doesn't mean it's true now. Just saying. Nobody knows what went on here except Kesha and Dr. Luke. He could very well be guilty.

[–]Armana1 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not quite. The alleged sexual assaults took place in 2005 and 2008:

According to the accusations, the alleged abuse occurred in 2005 and 2008.

[–]Endless_Summer 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She said she was abused for 10 years. She's either lying now or she lied under oath.

[–]massive_shadow 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is fair but Kesha has said this was something that had been going on for ten years, meaning she would have been raped or abused five years ago but she said she never was five years ago. Clearly something isn't adding up.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My question is the accusation for the current case for acts after 2011, or the same time frame in question?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (40 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Rethgil 33 points34 points35 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Please explain to me how someone sexually abuses someone else WITHOUT making sexual advances towards them in the process? Pedantic use of languge aside, it seems she pretty much has cleared him of charges she then tried to sue him for.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]jewsonparade 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's not advancing in a sexual way? A, sexual advance, if you will?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]jewsonparade 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, you keep arguing this with everyone. And yet you dont seem to understand that youre wrong.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]jewsonparade 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I'll just go down vote both of you.

[–]Mach_Two 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So...... by definition, a sexual advance.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]nuesuh 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

What is the difference?

If he has never been intimate with her, or made sexual advances towards her... How could he have sexually abused her?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (23 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Fwob 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Rape itself is a sexual advance.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Fwob 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

How can you be so dense? Is rape an advance? That is, does it forward a goal? Is it sexual in nature?

The answer to all these questions is yes, except the first one, which is answer is "Only god knows."

[–]SigmundFloyd76 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't you think that they mean "sexual advance" in a non-rapey way? Like did he hit on her in a manner that she perceived was sexual in nature? Or proposition her?

Also, wouldn't you think that the team of high priced lawyers would already have considered this to the nth degree? You and I, sitting home on our laptops, aren't privy to the inner workings of the case or the larger strategy.

I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, I tend to think it's all a ploy for publicity and contractual considerations, but lets be reasonable with the extrapolations.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Fwob 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Nice argument.

"You're wrong, and I'm not sure how but I'm very sure you're wrong. So instead of explaining how you're wrong I'll just act condescending with no actual argument to support myself." Great job!

Literally, any sexual action brought upon another person could be considered a sexual advance. If you disagree with this statement, please explain which part, and why instead of just throwing your hands in the air and giving up the second someone doesn't agree with you.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

meaninglessly abstract semantics.

"Guys the definition of the terms used doesn't really matter"

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's more that rape requires action that would constitute a sexual advance.

[–]whitey_sorkin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When asked if he ever have her a roofie, she said no.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And that he had not roofied her*

Also if they didn't have sexual interaction and he didn't try anything sexual with her, nor tried to roofie her, that functionally is saying he did not rape her.

[–]rozzer 64 points65 points66 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It was a female judge too, many people miss that detail

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I missed it.

[–]Xanthan81 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The judge didn't.

[–]ld2gj 70 points71 points72 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I felt bad for her, then I found out that Sony offered her the chance to have another "boss" and she refused...She now has dug her own grave.

[–]YFNN 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Edited by Power Delete Suite

[–]TracyMorganFreeman -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's interesting. Do you have a source on that?

[–]kenba2099 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's in the article in the link.

[–]ld2gj 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn, I cannot find it anymore! but i know that I read it somewhere. :/ Sorry.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mjociv 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A life sentence to an established pop star. When she was an 18 year old nobody the contract was amazing.

[–]ld2gj 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no sympathy for Sony; but she is not going to get any from me either.

Also she only has two Studio Albums; Animal (2010) and Warrior (2012). Her other ones were Compilation Albums (I Am the Dance Commander + I Command You to Dance: The Remix Album (2011) and Single Albums (Cannibal (2010) and Deconstructed (2013)).

So she only has done three years of albums with Sony.

[–]Daemonicus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Single Albums (Cannibal (2010) and Deconstructed (2013))

They're called EPs (Extended Play)

[–]TheXanderp 55 points56 points57 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Using rape allegations to get out of a contract? This Luke guy would be a fool not to prosecute Kesha, all the celebrity support for kesha is practically a public announcement that he's a rapist. She needs to be prosecuted.

[–]Rethgil 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whoever does so woupd be dead in the music business and probably the larger creative industry. So your idea is great in theory and I agree. But the reality highlights how scum like her get away with things like this usually.

[–]squeak6666yw 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think one of the biggest pop producers in the industry will be fine ruining her.

[–]HotSauciness 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This really isn't an open-shut case, it's just he-said, she-said. The earlier deposition, in an unrelated matter, isn't as big of a deal as people are making it. She was asked if she had an intimate sexual relationship with Dr. Luke, and she said no. It's possible she wasn't raped, it's also possible she didn't want to bring the rape up at that time for that question.

The other issues, such as Sony allowing her to work with other producers, and the fact that there is no evidence, are enough that she shouldn't be allowed to break the contract without some evidence. But as far as the rape goes, it's not a definite false accusation, just a he-said/she-said where it's important to emphasize "innocent until proven guilty"

[–]gurnysimpson 59 points60 points61 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Ah the "break-down in tears" defence, incredibly effective. Dr. Luke may have won the court case but when it's all said and done he'll have lost Ke$ha's war.

[–]icpierre 65 points66 points67 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Which is so sad because in reality all a woman needs to do is cry and claim rape and anything they set their heart on is theirs. Want out of this contract, cry and claim rape. Want to punish that guy for dumping you, cry and claim rape. Want to get a story written about you, cry and claim rape. Want to stop your company from firing you, cry and claim rape.

[–]ChaosOpen 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That is basically what Israel is like now. The police pretty much assume the man was guilty and until proven innocent and it has allowed women to hold any man at gunpoint.

[–]franklindeer 30 points31 points32 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

And Spain and everywhere else. One of the specific complaints made in that doc about Israel was the cab driver who is regularly accused of sexual assault by women who either don't want to pay the fare or want to break the rules. When they're told "no" they cry rape, which is hideous.

In Canada the exact same scenario played out with a cab driver. 3 young women wanted to smoke in the cab, driver said no, they called the police and claimed he sexually assaulted them. Fortunately for him he had cabin video of the entire ride and was exonerated. The police also brought charges against the three women, unlike in the Israeli cases.

Point being that Israel is not an extreme example but typical of a broader problem that has always existed and is only getting worse particularly in the western world. False rape allegations have been a concern since the classical period and are mentioned in ancient texts including the old testament. Clearly this is not a new phenomena.

[–]ChaosOpen 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The fact that women are so quick to lie and abuse the system to get their way does bring to light the reason why Mohammad might have said that a woman's testimony is worth half of a man's.

[–]fruitPuncher 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I think you're looking at this wrong, though I think I understand how you got there.

Men don't have an option that is treated the equivalent to a false rape claim. Women have a falsified rape as a claim they can't pretty feasibly make (not necessarily get away with) and when it happens its treated with all the seriousness of every other rape claim. But it's still an last ditch option that a women who is less morally inclined can use to get what she wants.

Men don't have an equivalent exploit within the legal system, and if we did, I'm certain there would be plenty of scumbags who'd claim that to get their way if they could. But there aren't any claims that a man can make that are equivalent to a women claiming false rape.

[–]franklindeer 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Men don't have an equivalent exploit within the legal system, and if we did, I'm certain there would be plenty of scumbags who'd claim that to get their way if they could.

Which is about the most extreme we should get about this. It's not that men are somehow better, it's that society has not provided equal tools of abuse to both sexes. The fact that women will use false rape accusations and men won't is a result of the fact that men can't, not that they wouldn't if they could. We need to make it more difficult, or at least discourage this from happening in the future, not ignore "women's testimony" like ChaosOpen suggests.

[–]HAESisAMyth 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Chaos isn't saying to ignore women's testimonies, he's saying their testimonies are worth less.

Agreeing with Islam is a risky route/slippery slope, but u/ChaosOpen thinks in this situation it's good

[–]Judenwilli 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He's not saying their testimonies are worth less, he states that he understands how Mohammed can think this way.

I can understand how some people can vote the AfD but since I don't agree with 90% of their views, I won't vote for them.

You misunderstood him, simply.

[–]fruitPuncher 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure. My main point is that logic doesn't support the assumption that jumps from false rape cases to understanding why someone could believe women's testimony is generally less reliable then a man's.

False Rape is just a specific example of perjury, which is a crime that will always exist and will always be committed by anybody regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, height, belly-button type. Using false rape cases as evidence to support that belief because we don't have a gauge for how much men would abuse a similar system.

The overall morality of women cannot be judged based on the decisions made by the few who are morally corrupt enough to abuse the justice system to intentionally make a false rape allegation.

And while there is a fight to be had around false rape claims the real problem isn't just in the fact that women claim false rape, but because (at least in American culture and society) we do not abide by the maxim "innocent until proven guilty" in today's day and age, but we judge our criminals "guilty as proven by the media", regardless of what is proven by the justice system

And I want to make it clear that when I replied to u/ChaosOpen, I was mostly trying to create a dialogue against a notion that seemed like it could easily sway toward an extreme, rather than attacking him for expressing something not entirely politically correct, that I don't agree with. Because while this is r/MensRights, I try to be pretty careful about making sure that the community that is fighting for men's rights doesn't start to fight against women's rights. And I think u/franklindeer was trying to help me calmly debate ideas we personally disagree with.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's. fucked up is the amount of people trying to claim "why would she lie" for this case.

She literally has millions in debt and contract requirements tied up to her being able to cut herself from this. It's a massive monetart incentive to lie.

Yet "there's no way she would drag herself through the mud for this". The fuck. She has complete support and is getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in free donations as well as millions in a debt contract.

People kill for less and lie about rape for extremely less.

[–]Mrmojoman0 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

or just cry "abuse" and get out of being caught trying to hire a hitman on camera, while specifically saying he had never abused her, and never put a hand on her.

[–]Samuel-pena 71 points72 points73 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I've been thinking that same way. Just the fact that Kesha is using her power as a celebrity to sway public opinion about Dr. Luke should be a crime. Even if he is guilty it is innocent until proven guilty.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Now, now, as we saw in the Ghomeshi case the court of public opinion is always right.

/s

[+]SuperSaiyanNoob -14 points-13 points-12 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Didn't he end up guilty though?...

[–]planned_serendipity1 24 points25 points26 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nope, the trial is still ongoing but all three complaintents stories have fallen apart. All three testified that they had nothing to do with Ghomeshi after the alleged assaults and all three have been proven to be liars. All three have been proven, by text messages etc., that they continued to date and have sex with Ghomeshi.

[–]SSapplejack 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven't been keeping up with this. I need to check it out.

[–]Rethgil 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What does that also say about the female celebrities who have personally funded her case wholst publicly this all reflects cultural misogyny? Or Lady Gaga publicly claiming the same? Seems most cutrent female celebrities are all equally deluded man haters.

[–]kenba2099 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look at how reviled Raven Symone are when it comes to speaking out against things SJW'S like.

[–]djangoboogie 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A by-product of the cult of feminism. What's worse is that the hordes of SJWs on reddit and other places are using the support from other female celebrities as proof that Kesha is telling the truth. I just hope one day some of these idiots get accused of a major crime and get fucking blasted by the same public opinion courts that they so vehemently support.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I wouldn't care for it. Every time one of them gets burnt, they claim that feminism has taken a wrong turn and that they only ever supported the good feminism that was all about truth and justice and equality. It never fails. The best ones are feminist mothers writing opinion pieces after their sons get falsely accused of rape and denied due process.

[–]nuesuh 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Libel/demation is a crime.

[+]doyoulikemenow -27 points-26 points-25 points 10 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

The crime in question would be slander? Ok. So you need to prove she's guilty of that, which will require you to prove she wasn't raped.

[–]Jerzeem 28 points29 points30 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A few problems with what you said. First, slander is a tort, not a crime. Second, in defamation cases, the defendant (that is, the person who said the thing) is responsible for proving that what they said is true if they want to use the statement's truth as their defense.

The plaintiff in a defamation case is responsible for proving that the defendant said/wrote the statement and that other people heard/saw the statement (and that the statement was damaging, if it's not defamation per se.)

[–]Mattstric 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Finding someone guilty of slander gets even more difficult when the person slandered is a celebrity, as is the case with Dr. Luke. He not only has to prove that her remarks were damaging, but he also has to prove she intended to damage him by making the false claims.

[–]Krissam 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The crime in question would be slander? Ok. So you need to prove she's guilty of that, which will require you to prove she wasn't raped.

Well, as she swore under oath that he DIDN'T sexually abuse her either slander or perjury the latter of which is punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

[–]Sabz5150 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

which will require you to prove she wasn't raped.

Negatives are not proven. They shift the burden of proof in a way near impossible to counter. That is like saying you need to prove dragons do not exist.

[+]ichors -13 points-12 points-11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

don't know why you got downvoted there. you're correct. here's an upvote

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What did Dr. Luke study in grad school?

[–]SuperDadMan 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sick jamz

[–]p_u_n_k[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

shitlord theory

[–]tramareddit111 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe he did or he didn't, but this business contract is completely unrelated

[–]Armana1 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it's related because she wants to use the rape claims to get out of it.

[–]hotchok 27 points28 points29 points 10 years ago* (38 children) | Copy Link

Okay, full disclosure, I'm a woman who was sexually assaulted by a former boss and this story hits pretty close to home for me.

I'm always curious why so many men's rights activists are so quick to jump to "LYING" when a woman claims she was assaulted. Like I said, as someone who has experienced sexual assault and was terrified to speak up, the immediate "she's lying" stuff really hits a tender spot.

I agree that this man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But the truth is, rape cases don't exist in a vacuum of perfect fairness. Sexual assault and rape is basically impossible to prove. I didn't report when I was sexually assaulted for a variety of reasons, and I don't regret that choice. I wasn't up for that kind of scrutiny and I was perfectly aware there wasn't any evidence to convict my boss anyway.

In fact, for a long time, I pretended my relationship with my former boss was totally hunky dory and professional, because I didn't want him to ruin my career or have the incident with him follow me for the rest of my life.

So I can totally see why Kesha might have lied five years ago. When you have a power disparity like the one here (biggest music producer in the world vs. the 20 year-old pop star he created) it is not outside the realm of believability that she might have perjured herself because she was scared of him and what his money and power could do to her.

I don't think we'll ever be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Luke did or did not do what Kesha claims he did. But to me, it seems like much more of a stretch that Kesha orchestrated an elaborate lie to get out of her contract for unknown reasons (including faking a stint in rehab, an extensive legal battle, intensive public scrutiny, and presumably paying for acting lessons to fake that courtroom breakdown, while risking torpedoing her career forever) than that she lied under oath five years ago because she was scared of a man who held considerable power over her.

If Kesha was really conniving enough to fake all this to get out of her contract, I believe she would have picked something easier to prove.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm always curious why so many men's rights activists are so quick to jump to "LYING" when a woman claims she was assaulted.

I'm more quick to jump to "innocent until proven guilty". Until she shows some evidence, I don't believe her. And Kesha has shown none.

[–]Atheist101 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

rape cases don't exist in a vacuum of perfect fairness. Sexual assault and rape is basically impossible to prove

That has almost no bearing on a contract case......this is CIVIL law, not CRIMINAL

[–]hotchok -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I know. I'm just pointing out that maybe it's kind of shitty for some people here to immediately call her a lying ho, the legal semantics of the situation notwithstanding.

[–]vonthe 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know about the ho part, but she was either lying then, or she's lying now. So the 'lying' accusation is certainly accurate.

[–]Ramicus 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least personally, she may be lying, she might not be lying. Whether or not you believe her, this case was separate from the accusations of rape. She wanted the court to say she doesn't have to work with Dr. Luke, and when the court said, "You already have it in writing that you don't have to work with this guy," everybody cried foul. That's my issue, personally, that she's creating a brouhaha over something that's truly a non-issue.

[–]Armana1 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So I can totally see why Kesha might have lied five years ago. When you have a power disparity like the one here (biggest music producer in the world vs. the 20 year-old pop star he created) it is not outside the realm of believability that she might have perjured herself because she was scared of him and what his money and power could do to her.

If she was lying under oath then, why can't she be lying now? Especially when there's no evidence apart from her testimony:

[Judge] Kornreich also spoke of seeking more information on Kesha’s abuse claims, saying the pop star didn’t provide evidence, such as hospital records, to support the assault allegations.

I don't think we'll ever be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Luke did or did not do what Kesha claims he did. But to me, it seems like much more of a stretch that Kesha orchestrated an elaborate lie to get out of her contract for unknown reasons (including faking a stint in rehab, an extensive legal battle, intensive public scrutiny, and presumably paying for acting lessons to fake that courtroom breakdown, while risking torpedoing her career forever) than that she lied under oath five years ago because she was scared of a man who held considerable power over her.

Kesha did not provide any evidence apart from her own testimony that she was drugged and sexually assaulted. If the judge allowed her to get out of the contract without paying severance fees on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations, wouldn't that open the door to allow every female signatory of legally binding contracts to use unfounded accusations to get out?

The thing is, Kesha could get out of the contract if she were willing to pay the severance fees. She's just doesn't want to pay up.

If Kesha was really conniving enough to fake all this to get out of her contract, I believe she would have picked something easier to prove.

Or maybe there isn't anything "easier" to prove. If she wanted to pursue justice against the man who raped her, why not file criminal charges instead? Could it be because those operate on a higher standard of proof?

[+]hotchok -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Or maybe there isn't anything "easier" to prove. If she wanted to pursue justice against the man who raped her, why not file criminal charges instead? Could it be because those operate on a higher standard of proof?

Probably. More often than not there isn't enough evidence in a sexual assault case to lead to a conviction, so victims don't bother. In my own experience my rapist used a condom so DNA evidence was never going to be there. And I didn't speak about it for a long time due to the fact that he was my boss.

[–]Armana1 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

If there isn't evidence then how could we be certain it occurred? How can we differentiate between false claims and true ones? You're seeing it entirely through the lens of being a rape victim; what if the false accused were the victim?

A falsely accused person would have their name and reputation dragged through mud, fired from their job, shunned by family, friends and possibly driven to suicide over baseless allegations.

EDIT: DNA evidence isn't the only admissible evidence in court. Not to mention the lack of condom doesn't mean there can't be other supporting evidence. You need to have something. Kesha provided nothing so far. Not surprising the judge denied her injunction.

[–]hotchok -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If there isn't evidence then how could we be certain it occurred? How can we differentiate between false claims and true ones? You're seeing it entirely through the lens of being a rape victim; what if the false accused were the victim?

I'm not certain it occurred. I'm also not certain it didn't. Everyone responding to my comments thinks I'm certain it did happen. I never said that.

A falsely accused person would have their name and reputation dragged through mud, fired from their job, shunned by family, friends and possibly driven to suicide over baseless allegations.

I do think rape and other sexual crimes should be handled anonymously, away from the public eye. Actually, I think all criminal cases should be handled anonymously, but especially sexual crimes considering the stigma they carry. It's incredibly Draconian the way we publicly prop people who haven't been convicted of anything and shame them.

EDIT: DNA evidence isn't the only admissible evidence in court. Not to mention the lack of condom doesn't mean there can't be other supporting evidence. You need to have something. Kesha provided nothing so far. Not surprising the judge denied her injunction.

I'm not surprised Kesha doesn't have any evidence. I don't have any either. I'm not a lawyer so I'm not making a comment on the fairness of the case's outcome. I'm just saying this doesn't mean it didn't happen and that abuse without clear-cut evidence doesn't happen to other people. You think abusers leave a trail?

[–]Armana1 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I do think rape and other sexual crimes should be handled anonymously, away from the public eye. Actually, I think all criminal cases should be handled anonymously, but especially sexual crimes considering the stigma they carry. It's incredibly Draconian the way we publicly prop people who haven't been convicted of anything and shame them.

I'm glad we agree on this. I think it's quite evident Kesha and her attorney are trying to trial Dr Luke by media.

However, the fact remains Kesha gave zero evidence that Luke raped her. She didn't even bother getting it investigated. Even alleged rape victims of Bill Cosby were willing to attempt to file decades-old charges against him, even though they allegedly occurred long after the expiration of statute of limitations. Why hasn't Kesha? Especially since her sexual assault allegations are still actionable? Could you plausibly argue that she's still afraid of Luke, even after all these emotional outpouring of support, with numerous celebrities rallying to her side, and Swift donating 250k to her?

She's using the alleged rape, with zero evidence for it to get out of a contract signed when she was a nobody, long before she became a top artist and is in a much better position today to renegotiate a contract on much more favourable terms. She has every financial incentive to break her contract.

She had rejected a offer to work for another producer under a different Sony label not owned by Dr Luke. The judge had specifically cited this rejection as reason to deny her injunction.

You've not addressed the argument that if the judge were to grant her out of the contract it despite the lack of evidence why wouldn't this allow every single female signatory to a legally binding contract to cry rape without proof to invalidate their contracts? The judge did the only reasonable and just thing anyone would do. I can't see a reason to disagree with it. She can still try again post trial.

I'm not surprised Kesha doesn't have any evidence. I don't have any either. I'm not a lawyer so I'm not making a comment on the fairness of the case's outcome. I'm just saying this doesn't mean it didn't happen and that abuse without clear-cut evidence doesn't happen to other people. You think abusers leave a trail?

Rapists are similar to other criminals. They are human, make mistakes, sometimes stupidly big ones. I'm not expecting Kesha herself to have evidence. It's the police's job to ask questions and tell the victims to turn over any records which could count as evidence of the alleged rapes. Kesha isn't even willing to start the investigative process which could lead to a finding that Luke raped her, if it was true. Why not?

[–]Brodusgus 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

She doesn't have to work with Dr Luke. She only has to deal with Sony. She can record 6 albums and be done and those albums could be garbage as long as she fulfills the contract. If she made an album with white noise it's still an album. Wherever she has support, people will help her get out of the contract.

[–]rtechie1 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

She can't just make albums of white noise, they have to be real songs and critically she has to tour and promote them.

I suspect that's what she's really pissed off about, Sony requiring her to tour constantly.

[–]Brodusgus 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If no one buys tickets to the show, Sony is flying her around for her benefit. She can fullfill her contract and ask fans to boycott the sale. It won't reflect on her talent to fans

[–]PlaidShirtz 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're absolutely delusional if you thinks a contract doesn't have things in it to prevent exactly what you're saying

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PlaidShirtz 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll let you in on some secrets not everyone is reported in the news . And multi billion dollar companies have some of the most expensive lawyers in the world along with airtight contracts!

[–]hotchok -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's still under Dr. Luke's label and he's still contracted to record six songs with her. It's basically Sony's word, and considering up until recently they had tried to force her to work with her alleged rapist, I don't think I'd feel safe with their word either.

[–]Brodusgus 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does the contract state she has to be in his presence? Biggie Smalls died. He still made records. So did a lot of other dead artist. If Sony wants to split hairs then so can she.

[–]mjociv 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Kesha's own lawyers describe the sexual assault case Kesha makes as “vague and unsubstantiated, with pivotal details such as dates fudged.”

That's why I'm pretty comfortable saying she is lying to get out of a contract she willingly signed.

I don't doubt that Dr. Luke is a total asshole. If she can prove he verbally abused her than the eating disorder and rehab are certainly evidence that his words caused real harm. This all happened long after the alleged sexual abuse and there seems to be actual evidence that he was verbally abusive.

Somewhat unrelated but: you and a few other people here seem to be highly critical of this sub for not believing Kesha. To me this seems reminiscent of the Rolling Stone/UVA story when similarly sanctimonious comments popped up under every article about it. How did you feel when Jackie was shown to be lying about everything? Did you condemn her at all?

[–]hotchok -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Somewhat unrelated but: you and a few other people here seem to be highly critical of this sub for not believing Kesha. To me this seems reminiscent of the Rolling Stone/UVA story when similarly sanctimonious comments popped up under every article about it. How did you feel when Jackie was shown to be lying about everything? Did you condemn her at all?

I think it's entirely possible she could be lying. Based on my own experiences it doesn't seem likely to me, but I'm not saying I definitively know the truth like some people here who say she's lying and that's that.

I didn't follow the UVA case, but false rape accusations are obviously heinous. I understand skepticism, but the point I'm trying to make here that everyone seems to be missing is that some of the language around here is part of the reason why I never went after my attacker. People who automatically side with the accused contribute to the messiness of rape cases just as much as people who automatically side with the accuser.

I really think rape cases (civil and criminal) should be anonymous unless a guilty verdict is reached. We should be protecting both the accused and the accuser from gossip and slander.

So in conclusion, I really don't know who's telling the truth here and I never will. But I was in a similar position as Kesha with my boss and I lied about what happened to me because I was scared. No one here knows what it's like to have a man in a position of power over you rape you, so you really can't take her testimony as concrete proof. You don't know who's lying either.

[–]simplers2 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you see your own bias here ? And I mean that respectfully.

But I was in a similar position as Kesha with my boss and I lied about what happened to me because I was scared.

You think she is a victim like you. You know the personal details of your own situation and you are not lying. So you sympathize with her because you could identify with her situation which looks similar.

But if Kesha is lying, she was not in a similar situation like you. So the premise become faulty.

[–]hotchok 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You think she is a victim like you. You know the personal details of your own situation and you are not lying. So you sympathize with her because you could identify with her situation which looks similar.

I don't know if she's a victim. Read through my posts -- I said I don't know and probably never will. But the OP called this an "open and shut case" and all I said was "actually, no, it's not."

[–]mjociv -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In summary:

Kesha's own lawyers describe her case as "unsubstantiated" but you still think "it doesn't seem likely" that she is lying(no objective reason given), your posts history reads like a writer from feministing.com playing the part of a political moderate, and you claim to not know anything about the Rolling Stone/UVA case despite clearly following and having strong opinions on gender politics.

Either you can see why you look like a troll who is false flagging or how dare I accuseexpose you!

[–]hotchok 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Either you can see why you look like a troll who is false flagging or how dare I accuseexpose you!

k

I've been following the Kesha case closely because it's personal -- something similar happened to me.

[–]mjociv -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You made accusations against a former employer in a blatantly transparent move to create leverage(you had none otherwise) in getting out of a contract you willingly signed? Because that is what Kesha is doing here.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So you can totally see her lying 5 years ago but you can't see her lying now? Did she find Jesus?

If you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he raped her, then he remains innocent. What you are basically saying is: "Women don't lie about rape and her word, even without evidence, is good enough for me." Will you extend that courtesy to any woman who claims they were raped years before?

Where rape is concerned, even innocence is not a defense, it seems.

[+]hotchok -8 points-7 points-6 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I never said he definitively did it. I'm calling out the redditors here who jump to, "she's lying!" by pointing out that abuse victims often have an incentive to lie about abuse when their abuser is in a position of power over them.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well here's the thing, the middle ground is innocent.

[–]hotchok 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

huh?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We have a presumption of innocence so unless you think he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, then he remains innocent. The middle ground does not fall on the guilty side.

[–]MyAfricanChild 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Niether belief nor disbelief are justified here. The 'only' justified position is suspension of believe. Simply the evidence does not fit the conclusion, even weakly, for belief or disbelief (irrespective of statistical assumptions). You can say you 'believe in' Kesha's testimony, but that does not concern a proposition but a commitment or trust. Many people state that in believing in Kesha they further believe that Kesha was raped, they are unjustified, since what they are saying is that 'this is how I take the world to be', when their belief is not the one which best fits their evidence. Irrespective of the outcome this fiasco their belief is unjustified. So for people to constantly point out 'what if she is lying' is simply to object to people believing that 'Kesha was raped is true', which is an unjustified belief.

[–]vonthe 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The core problem that Kesha has now is that she has told two different stories to two different courts. And that is going to sink her - there's nothing like lying in court (and she did: either she was lying then or she's lying now) to cause a judge to dismiss your testimony as essentially worthless.

Kesha's problem is that she is getting bad legal advice - why in the name of god would a lawyer allow her to say what she's saying when there's a sworn deposition out there contradicting her words? Possibly her legal team was banking on the deposition remaining sealed.

[–]simplers2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is one of those conflicting situations. She seems to genuinely love her fans and her pic where she is crying really looked heart breaking too.

More than MRAs defending that Luke guy, I think it is the idea that you can accuse a guy of rape and ruin his career is what scares most of the people commenting here.

I believe she would have picked something easier to prove.

If you think about it, you are asking why a woman would falsely accuse a guy/lie about rape. It is exactly this mindset that might result in people making more false claims. In any system, if there is a loophole, people are going to take advantage of it. It is not question of gender.

I am also curious, what would have been more easier to prove ?

[–]hotchok 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it is the idea that you can accuse a guy of rape and ruin his career is what scares most of the people commenting here.

That's fair, and I do think there should be gag orders on cases of sexual violence. I think that would be beneficial to the accuser and the accused.

I'd also put money on Dr. Luke continuing to make music long after this debacle is over.

But what I find more disturbing is that Kesha came to Sony and said "this guy raped me, I don't want to have anything to do with him" and Sony said, "our company invested millions in your career and this guy's label so tough cookies." If you look into the case Sony only recently gave her the option to work with another producer. The fact that Sony put money above an artist's safety is the more concerning aspect of this. Had they dealt with her claims earlier on rather than fight them this probably wouldn't be such a public spectacle and Luke's career wouldn't have missed a beat.

[+]muchachomalo -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think she was fake crying. She probably didn't fake her stint in rehab plenty of people who weren't raped have been to rehab. A lot of people cry when court cases don't go there way. So many mens rights activists jump to lying because we have first hand experience with it. If you look around the subreddit you will find articles about such cases of false accusations. Further more rape cases are not impossible to prove. They are impossible to prove if you wait years to report them. Her motive isn't mysterious she wants out of her sick album contract. The contract probably does suck but she could buy it out. Shit she should raise the money from all these other pop stars to have them buy her out of it.

[–]hotchok -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess from my perspective, no crappy contract would be worth what she's going through right now unless there's some truth to what she's saying. I could have fought my rapist in court. I didn't because the road ahead didn't seem worth it. Rape accusations can be just as taxing on the accuser as they can be on the accused.

Until this lawsuit is resolved her career is effectively over for several years, if not forever. It makes so much more sense to me that if it were simply about money or her contract she'd just suck it up and keep pumping out the albums. By taking the route she's taking she effectively won't have a source of income for five or more years, not to mention mounting legal fees and intense public scrutiny.

Furthermore, the amount of support she's getting from people in the industry, and people who have personally worked with Dr. Luke, tells me something fishy is going on with him. Even when people know stuff is going on they don't want to speak out because they're afraid of biting the hand that feeds them.

[–]scupy42 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I want to know why the hell she had to sweat under oath that he didn't rape her. Where did that come about?

[–]IAmMadeOfNope 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another case where i believe sony was being sued.

[+]Rethgil -9 points-8 points-7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Google it.

[–]qdobe 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Though I do not know the details of the case, and the Rape case still has yet to be settled, it seems to me that Kesha just REALLY wants to leave Sony, and that is the major goal here. People pointed to her sobbing as proof that rape occurred, well, she could be upset that she didn't get released from the contract either, because those are real emotions as well. She seems more upset about not being able to leave sony than anything else, even the actual rape...

[–]cottonthread 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a thing called the backfire effect where a person with strong beliefs will actually have them reinforced when confronted by evidence that those beliefs are false. It's possible that this is what we're seeing here.

[–]Electroverted 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

An engineered pop star wants to break the chains of the company that made her. This would be like One Direction trying to go solo.

Gets mommy involved, who writes a nasty note to her producer. Ineffective.

Uses the rape card with no evidence or criminal trial. Ineffective.

Claims PTSD, is told she has flexibility with her production choices = Ineffective.

Uses the crying, sensitive, victimized woman card. We'll see where this goes, but I'd say hey career went from dying to decayed.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Electroverted 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she wrote all of her own songs and songs for Miley Cyrus/Britney Spears

fair enough

[–]jimmybrite 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wrote songs, like the lyrics? Who gives a shit when Dr.Luke was the producer/engineer. That's where the real talent lies and not with sophomoric lyrics about partying, doing drugs and having sex.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This would be like One Direction trying to go solo

Uhhhh

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]yummyluckycharms 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not really - they probably have inside information and are trying to get kesha to reveal it.

Moreover, if kesha is claiming that she was raped, by asking her if she had an intimate relation with Dr luke would throw that claim into question

[–]Rethgil 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not if the lawyers knew she was a mentally unbalanced person prone to theowing around fake accusations of all kinds to get her way. And given her history in mental institutions and rehab centres and her equally crazed and domineering mother, im sure they werent that surprised.

[–]youhatetruth 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But but...a VAGINA OWNER indicated the guilt of a MALE, SHITLORDE`! /s

[–]cottonthread 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen this phrasing a few times now. Where did this 'vagina' thing come from? Why not just say woman?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Since we don't know for sure whether or not Luke raped her, I do have some sympathy for her. If it's true, it would suck to be in her situation.

BUT since Kesha said under oath that he never assaulted her, there's not much anyone can do about it. Contracts exist for a reason. If you can get out of a contract by saying you were raped even though you originally lied about it, everyone would get out of their contracts because then they'd be meaningless.

[–]Dnile1000BC 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female privilege in action.

[–]ThePigmanAgain -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Let this be a lesson to male producers -- never work with women. Really, take your talents and use them to turn men into big pop stars. You'll be doing both yourselves and the male sex a big favor.

[–]kingofcustard -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone downvoted this... I assume because they thought it was misogynistic or something. But he's right. Female privilege is a thing. If women are allowed to simply get out of contracts by accusing men of rape and crying some crocodile tears to sell the story, smart men are going to stop wanting to work with them because it could be them next. And that is going to hurt women in the industry.

And for all that feminists say they're for equality, I don't see one calling bullshit and telling Kesha she needs to woman up, stop damseling, and fulfill her damn contract, like any man would have to do. I don't see one complaining about how this case makes all women look suspect. And none of the "patriarchy hurts men too" people are calling Kesha's get-out-of-contract-free card patriarchy - they're all too busy whining "poor Kesha" or sending Dr. Luke abusive tweets or imperiously screaming on Tumblr or Facebook about how bad women have it because sometimes when you falsely accuse someone of rape it doesn't quite stick.

[–]Rethgil -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So glad to see someone finally speak out about this. As you say its utterly clear cut yet have seen so many sensible people on social media post retarded 'you go girl' type petitions backing this horrible messed up woman and slurring a man a court has decided is not guilty of any charges. Someone MUST counter sue her for libel and wrongful prosecution.

[–]p_u_n_k[S] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I tweeted about it yesterday and lost 2 friends because of it. People are so blind when it comes to this case

[+]Ovendice -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

$1000 says she got fucked up one night and had sex with him and then did again a few more times. Now she doesn't want to be with him anymore... but it's like having an affair with someone you work with anywhere, when you break up, well, they're not going away! They're going to be right there again tomorrow morning.

The fact that most women today IMMEDIATELY resort to making a false accusation of rape or sexual assault to solve every problem is very telling about how empty and black their souls are. To just frivolously destroy someone else's entire life just to solve a technical matter.

It also gives you insight into WHY women are so horrible at business (only 2% of CEOs are women, only 6% of CFOs are women, 5% of COOs, etc.) .. women don't negotiate, they DEMAND. And if you don't give into those demands, they instantly start making false accusations of the very worst kind to destroy someone or some other form of blackmail and fraud. When all they would have had to done back when they were little girls is learn how to barter, the art of I'll do this for you if you do this for me, instead of always trying to be a 'princess' who gives commands.

[–]LilyBentley 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The fact that most women today IMMEDIATELY resort to making a false accusation of rape or sexual assault to solve every problem is very telling about how empty and black their souls are.

Source please. I'm down for hating on my own gender sometime but that's pretty farfetched.

[–]Ovendice -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol Source? Every false rape accusation you read about on this sub and everywhere else for that matter that are daily. There is your never ending stream of source that shows how empty and black their souls are. Were you under the impression that women make false accusations of rape out of love and empathy? Whatever drugs you're on.. I'd love some too.

[–]Superaverunt 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Somebody made this point further up in the thread and it's a fair point. It's not like ALL women have empty black/souls or that all of them would. I really even don't think it's fair to say of MOST women.

The problem is that way things work socially, women have an unverifiable ace up their sleeve to manipulate certain situations - the false rape card. As it stands, men don't have a similar card to play. There are plenty of men who are just as morally bankrupt as women and would play the same card if they could.

[–]LilyBentley -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL I'm a rape accuser.

Where did you get that I think rape accusations are out of love?

Edit: Why am I being downvoted for what should be obvious sarcasm?

[–]hotchok 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, you're hateful.

[–]OilyB -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

-women don't negotiate, they demand

Kudos! They're often sore losers. Acceptance is hard emotional work, which men are far better at.

My $0.02

[–]Ovendice 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes and women simply cannot deal with rejection either.

They're often sore losers.

Which is at the core of what women who call themselves 'Feminists' are really on about; they have to deal with not being hired somewhere or someone is better than them at something or gets a promotion over them because the other person was smarter, harder working.. competition in general. So then they scream 'discrimination' instead of simply shrugging their shoulders the way men do and simply work harder and get better so they get the job next time; succeed in life, etc. It's why women today have no character and never grow as people.

[–]ReidErickson -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Plus people who even care about this usually don't really understand it. When I heard about this, the girl who told me said her manager raped her and Sony won't let her find a new manager. But I dont see an issue for supporting Kesha. If she was actually raped and abused, and Sony was aware of this, I could understand not wanting to be in contract with them anymore.

[–]LilyBentley 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Except they actually offered her another manager, so... looks weird unless she is going to claim the company itself raped her.

[–]ReidErickson 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know I agree. I know even though she can't break the contract, she doesn't have to work him. But If Sony was aware of the abuse as Kesha claims, I could see why she wouldn't even want to stay with them as her label. I'm not saying I feel the ruling was wrong. I'm saying there's nothing wrong with thinking it was wrong.

[–]YFNN 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Edited by Power Delete Suite

[–]Atheist101 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she cares more about the money rather than getting away from her "attacker"...

[–]LilyBentley 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but that doesn't make sense. If Kesha makes them money, they would advertise right? Sony isn't just in it to make her dreams come true.

[+]doyoulikemenow -38 points-37 points-36 points 10 years ago (51 children) | Copy Link

It's open-shut in the sense that there's insufficient evidence to convict him for rape, yes, probably. And he absolutely shouldn't be convicted unless there's more evidence.

However, that doesn't prove that she wasn't raped. In fact, it's more likely than not that she was. So as long as you're not harming him in any way, why not support her? Do we only support people who can prove that they were the victim of a crime?

Sorry, but if you were unable to film yourself being raped or have witnesses present, you don't get any support

That seems pretty cruel.

[–]SilencingNarrative 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In fact, it's more likely than not that she was.

How do you figure?

[–]ChaosOpen 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact that when the crime in question took place she stayed on another 8 years and recorded 2 albums only to say "I was raped" then dropping criminal charges to only pursue a release from the contract has more than a few people thinking that the rape never took place, and that she is only claiming it to incite an emotional response from the judge to get him to side with her and allow her to illegally abandon a contract she has no right to otherwise leave.

Why don't people think there is "no harm in supporting her?" Because its makes a mockery of real rape victims.

As far as the case goes, for some reason Kesha doesn't want the rape investigated, so she has worded the complaint in such a way so that the rape is not under question. "I was raped 8 years ago, so does or does that not that allow me to leave the contract." She words the question in such a way so that the rape does not get questioned, yet to anyone following the case, the case appears to be about the rape, not the contract. So, if the judge says: "it does not" then it sounds like he said that he doesn't believe she was raped. This puts him in a rather tight situation: to go with the law or be accused of being a "rape apologist."

[–]Spoonwood 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

In fact, it's more likely than not that she was.

Under oath on the stand she said that she didn't have an intimate relationship with Gottwald:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2802370/kesha-swore-oath-2011-deposition-dr-luke-did-not-sexually-abuse-undercutting-rape-allegations-latest-lawsuit.html

More specifically, p. 149 of the following:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1342034/exhibit-b.pdf

[–]zaisoke 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

If there is not enough evidence to support her claim of rape, I absolutely will not support her, or her allegations, because that does harm him. It harms any one who has ever been falsely accused, or convicted for a false accusation. It harms those who havent gotten justice for their rape to support a baseless claim.

If the evidence is to come forth, and it turns out she was raped, then she deserves all the support in the world, but supporting what evidently looks like a false accusation is appalling and I refuse to do so.

[–]bertreapot 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This isn't even a rape claim. It is a contract dispute. In addition to wanting out of her contract, Kesha is claiming the Dr. Luke raped her, and that the court is forcing her to continue working with her rapist. That is the publicity spin she is using. However, she never went to the police, she never pressed charges.

If Kesha had gone to criminal court and alleged that she had been sexually assaulted, then we could have a discussion about whether Luke is innocent or not, and whether the courts treat rape victims fairly, or railroad the falsely accused. None of this is truly the issue however, Kesha's contract is.

[–]zaisoke -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

the rape trial is actualy ongoing, this was an injunction, and is still entirely relevant to the rape case

[–]bertreapot 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She is suing him for damages, AFAIK. That is not a criminal rape trial.

[–]zaisoke -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I stand corrected, regardless though, the rape is still entirely relevant to the case, and the defamation and damages on both parties is entirely relevant

if she cannot prove the rape, she will not break her contract, and she will lose the defamation lawsuits from gottwald.

there is clearly no winner here, doesnt matter who wins the case

[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there is clearly no winner here, doesnt matter who wins the case

Ke$ha's clearly the winner here. She's already received a quarter million dollars from Taylor Swift.

It's a PR goldmine for Ke$ha (the $ seems more appropriate now than ever before).

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No winner? Definitely a more likely loser though as there usually is when unfounded vague and unproven rape allegations are thrown around.

[–]bertreapot -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The contract issue is already over and done with. Kesha lost. She may win in civil court and get damages from Luke, she may not. Either way it won't affect her contract.

[+]FalconGK81 -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

If my Magic card collection is stolen from my house, there will likely not be enough evidence to prove who stole it. That doesn't mean that my accusation that it was stolen is false. /u/doyoulikemenow has a fair point. Yes, it would mean that we shouldn't demonize the accused thief, but it doesn't mean that I'm not a victim.

[–]casusbelli1 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If your Magic cards are stolen, it is possible to confirm that you no longer possess them. This doesn't prove you were the victim of a crime (perhaps you accidentally threw them out), but at the least we can determine that your cards--Moxes, dual lands and all--are gone.

In Kesha's case, we can't even determine whether she was a victim or had consensual sex. She may be a victim, but we can just as easily decide to believe that Dr. Luke is a victim of her false accusations. We don't have enough information to make a determination either way, and because of that, I'm neutral on this until more information comes to light.

[–]zaisoke 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for that clarification, you worded it far better than I did

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FalconGK81 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not saying we should disagree with the legal ruling, I'm saying that just because there isn't enough proof for a court of law, that does not mean the event didn't happen.

I'll try another analogy. I'm walking down the street late at night. I see my friend Steve. He walks up and assaults me. I go to the police. They are unable to find any evidence that he assaulted me. There were no other witnesses, there were no surveillance cameras, and Steve won't answer any questions about his whereabouts. There is no proof to show that Steve assaulted me, just my word. So obviously he shouldn't be tried or found guilty. That doesn't change the reality that he did in fact assault me.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but in relation to this case, that point is irrelevant. If you want to consider it as a philosophical point, then fine. Nobody else is obligated to.

[–]FalconGK81 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's fine. I was simply supporting the proposition that just because a thing cannot be proven in a court of law, it does not follow that the thing is false.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. But, people are criticizing you because whole correct, your statement adds nothing to the discussion. People aren't saying it is impossible that it happened, they're just saying there is no proof, and accusations without proof are becoming problematic in today's society.

[–]zaisoke 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it is likely that you have previously purchased many magic cards, likely with several witnesses. Provided you no longer have a magic collection, its pretty safe to assume that the only evidence needed here is that you have records and no actual collection

this is comparing apples to oranges

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FalconGK81 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Precisely what I'm saying. There isn't proof it was stolen, but it doesn't change the fact that it was.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FalconGK81 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

You're saying the physical universe warps around what can be proven? If I can't prove it was stolen, they therefore weren't stolen? That's so astoundingly absurd, I don't even know what to say.

[–]bufedad 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If you can't prove it was stolen, then we have no reason to believe that they were stolen from you.

If we only have your word that they were stolen, that is not enough.

[–]FalconGK81 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't give a crap what you believe. I'm talking about objective reality. I'm saying that the logical claim:

If there is no proof for X, then X is false

Is a false claim.

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There is no such thing as objective reality.

Secondly, you believe X happened. I don't care what you believe. I care what you can prove.

Your belief that something happened means nothing.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FalconGK81 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That's not absurd, that's life.

You're saying that "it's life" that if I can't prove something was stolen, it wasn't stolen? That's INSANE. It's true that no one should be prosecuted for it, because the evidence doesn't exist to substantiate the claim, but we're talking about a logical statement that is undeniable. If something is stolen, even if I can't prove it was stolen, that doesn't change the fact that it was stolen.

There is a better analogy. Say I'm walking home late at night. I see my friend Steve. Steve walks up to me and assaults me. Then he runs away. I go to the police and tell them I was assaulted. They are unable to find any witnesses or any surveillance footage, and Steve refuses to answer questions (because he's smart). The police tell me there is nothing they can do for me, because they can't prove Steve assaulted me. My word alone is not sufficient to prove that Steve assaulted me (even though I know he did).

Being unable to prove that Steve assaulted me doesn't change the fact that I was assaulted! The universe doesn't magically warp itself and undo the assault. I was still assaulted. That's the point that I'm arguing here, and to suggest otherwise is so far from reality, that I frankly don't even know why I'm having this argument.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]doyoulikemenow -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say anything about supporting her allegations, and nor did the title. We're talking about supporting her as a person, and more specifically in her attempt to annul her contract with her alleged rapist. The most harm that can be done is the monetary loss that he might incur – and frankly, that's not my chief concern.

It doesn't "look like a false accusation". The facts of the case a perfectly consistent with it being either true or false. Statistically, it's more likely that it's true than that it's false. In any case, I think the vitriol for her that you find on /r/mensrights is pretty strange – isn't she innocent until proven guilty?

[–]ichors 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i haven't seen any vitriol directed at her, only at the people supporting her allegation.

I think anyone who wants to support Kesha, whilst also not supporting her allegation, is going to have a tricky time as her argument for the nullification of her contract is that she was raped.

[–]zaisoke 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

in my view, by supporting her in this issue, you sort of default into supporting her claims. I could give a shit less about dr. luke, or sony's monetary gain, but i do care about the law and the seriousness of he allegations she has made.

Youre coppin out a bit here tho too, her innocence isnt even whats being questioned in this trial, its Gottwalds, which is why i dont think she deserves any support in this case until her allegations can be proven true. You dont believe everything you read on the internet do you? why would you believe everything you hear too?

[–]doyoulikemenow 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I never said I believed her. However, in a case where proof is impossible, support can still be justified. If we didn't support people who couldn't prove their accusations, the majority of victims of crime wouldn't get any support.

[–]zaisoke 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

im not speaking in terms of all crime, not all crime has circumstances, and punishments, equal to rape. it can be easily discerned if someone was abused, or if they have been stolen from, but rape, outside of a narrow window, is a very touchy subject. it is often not easy to determine the truth, and has led to a lot of suffering both through actual rapes, and false accusations.

i will not support her, i will wait for the evidence to support the winner of the case

[–]mjociv 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Statistically, it's more likely that it's true than that it's false.

Source please? The study on the validity of sexual assault claims used as leverage in getting out of an unrelated legal contract would be a fun read. Even just a paraphrasing of the methodology used would help, I can't think of how to objectively study this.

[–]Spoonwood -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Innocent until proven guilty consists of a legal standard. She isn't on trial for a false rape accusation, and I don't believe Dr. Luke has an interest in prosecuting such a case.

How do you say that you did not have an intimate relationship with a person and NOT mean that they you did not have sex with them, when the phrase 'intimate relationship' is a euphemism for a strictly sexual relationship?

While the term intimate relationship commonly implies the inclusion of a sexual relationship, the term is also used as a euphemism for a relationship that is strictly sexual [emphasis added].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimate_relationship

[–]Rethgil -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Giving someone support and shouting about someone being a rapist before anything is proven are two things that even a dead mouse could tell the difference between.

[–]PotatoDonki 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I'm not gonna support someone in ruining someone else's life on "likely". Statistics and probabilities in other rape cases shouldn't inform our decision here at all. Just because people don't usually lie about it, doesn't mean she isn't. So I'm not convinced.

[–]ShutupPussy -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, but if you were unable to film yourself being raped or have witnesses present, you don't get any support 

That seems pretty cruel.

Sounds like he doesn't get how a rape works.

[–]Proteus_Marius -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hopefully, this fellow is waiting under legal advice for the current shameful abuse of the courts to end before he seeks significant any damages.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter