~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
shadowguyver
[–]Kulovicz1 485 points486 points487 points 2 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
I don't carenif it's for marketing purposes. Still better job than most today's companies do.
[–]throwawayincelacc 240 points241 points242 points 2 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Even if it is for marketing purposes, at least it shows public perception changed so that corporations need to at least recognize father's day. Remember 1-2 years ago when women were treating it as a second mother's day? And some corporations bandwagon that?
[–]TangledGoatsucker 40 points41 points42 points 2 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Target has been trying to draw an alternative lifestyles audience so this kind of garbage goes with it. Funny, you don't see two-dad families in Target, though.
[–]jakelove12 52 points53 points54 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Ironic that the only cover featuring actual human beings is the one you point out as being out of place for representing people who potentially shop at target.
Also gay ppl shop at target wtf do you think they do, survive without the need for groceries on photosynthesis?
[+]TangledGoatsucker -29 points-28 points-27 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Gay people shop everywhere. I've never seen two-dads at Target. This is pure pandering.
[–]vinnyvinnyvinnyvinny 25 points26 points27 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yea man, weird internet battle you’ve chosen to fight… but gay dudes and gay dads shop at target.
[–]crow_077 17 points18 points19 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So because you’ve never seen two gay dads at target they simply don’t exist? Maybe you assumed they were just friends. I’m a bi man and I personally love target. Not everyone makes it obvious btw you pass queer people all the time and don’t even realize it.
[–]jakelove12 28 points29 points30 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I have.
Do you make it a habit to investigate the sexuality and parental status of every person you come across in target specifically?
[+]testaccount9597 -13 points-12 points-11 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How far up your ass does your head need to before you can determine which is more common?
[+]TangledGoatsucker -14 points-13 points-12 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Apparently pretty damned far.
[–]GnomeChompy 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bottom right books looks like its meant for kids with gay dads at least!
[+]pbj_sammichez -8 points-7 points-6 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
You absolutely see them in more progressive areas where people arent trying to force others to live by the rules some stupid religion (spoiler: they're all stupid). If there arent gay couples in stores in your area then it's probably a religiously-opprrssive area that progressive people avoid. For good reason.
[+]TangledGoatsucker -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What areas are "forcing people to live by the rules of some stupid religion)?
I live in Denver. It's a solid blue. Gays everywhere. Twodads? Basically never. This is pandering.
What we have around here actually is forcefeeding of LGBT if anything.
[–]AdBeginning676 -4 points-3 points-2 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
This. I'm in Indiana (Bible belt state that's being bled purple by Illinois and California refugees) and we have LGBT propaganda EVERYWHERE. My 5 year old's preschool: every window has a sticker proclaiming you need to be an advocate and an ally. The only surviving bookstore after the shutdown nonsense: SIX stands of "pro acceptance literature". We have billboards and stupid gas station advertisements that play over OUTDOOR speakers promoting the lifestyle.
And to be fair, we see quite a few lesbian couples out in public and with kids. Almost never 2 men and a child, ignoring potential sexuality. It's usually a single mother with multiple children, a father alone with a small number or single child, or two men spending time together whether they are gay or not.
[–]TangledGoatsucker 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I miss the days when they advertised on merit or even threw in some boobies. Now it's all ideological.
[–]AdBeginning676 -4 points-3 points-2 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
At least it's all on one side. Makes it simple to completely ignore it.
Well, now that my kids are all being homeschooled and in intermural sports it's easy to ignore.
[–]TangledGoatsucker -4 points-3 points-2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It is just bizarre to see the societal-level force feeding of sexual fetishism.
[–]_BeefJerk 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because of this, when I saw the title of the post, I did not expect this kind of picture. A pleasant surprise.
[–]philhalo66 440 points441 points442 points 2 years ago (50 children) | Copy Link
i cant wait for the UN to post about how women face struggles and real men support womens rights on fathers day.
[–]throwaway3569387340 239 points240 points241 points 2 years ago* (29 children) | Copy Link
Fathers Day losing significance.
Women most affected.
[–]knucklz74 34 points35 points36 points 2 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
Their goal along with the lbgtq gjdd. What the he'll it is . Is to COMPLETELY DISMANTLE THE NUCLEAR FAMILY.
[–]TangledGoatsucker 22 points23 points24 points 2 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Marx and Engels said it was bourgeois and oppressive and has to go!
[–]Oncefa2 22 points23 points24 points 2 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link
Technically Engels thought neighbors / extended family / friends should be more neighborly and help out more (ie work together). It's where the phrase "it takes a village" comes from.
He argued that capitalism has broken down extended social structures to just the mother, father, and children. And that this wasn't healthy because humans naturally organize into larger groups than that.
He didn't necessarily argue against the nuclear family in the way you probably assume though. He instead argued that the nuclear family shouldn't be as isolated as it is today.
Which is something that I think many conservatives agree with. Strong communities foster strong families and vice versa.
I wouldn't expect a conservative to agree with everything Engles said but I think his issue with the nuclear family has been exaggerated and misinterpreted by leftists (and especially by radical feminists who try to claim him). It wasn't Engles who wanted to get rid of the family unit. It's misguided leftists who don't understand the theoretical underpinnings of socialism who believe that.
(*He also thought inheritance kept money at the top, but that was a legal issue, not an argument against the family per se).
[–]TangledGoatsucker 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If you know where in his writings he was digging deeper into the family issue, I'm curious to see. I was basing my remarks on the Communist Manifesto.
[–]LouisdeRouvroy 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Origin_of_the_Family,_Private_Property_and_the_State
Although it's based on the wrongful ideas of Morgan and that of a supposed original matrilineal family, which no anthropologists now believe in.
His intentions regarding family don't need that though (although it changes the historical perspective). He never said let's destroy the family just because.
[–]WikiSummarizerBot[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan (German: Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats) is an 1884 philosophical treatise by Friedrich Engels. It is partially based on notes by Karl Marx to Lewis H. Morgan's book Ancient Society (1877). The book is an early historical materialist work and is regarded as one of the first major works on family economics.
[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5
[+]knucklz74 -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Let me say, I'm NOT A CONSERVATIVE, that's siding with the criminals as well as the Democrats are criminals. I'm AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALIST ,AND part of THE MAJORITY OF 200 MILLION AMERICANS THAT ARE MUTED BECAUSE WE BELIEVE in AMERICAN VALUES. AND BOTH I REPEAT these parties are CRIMINALS. And just so you don't start getting your wet and giggly inside . SSOCIALISM IS GARBAGE 🗑. And it belongs right there in thefuckin trash. As a person Trump is garbage ,but I don't and many others don't vote for him because he's my friend or he's nice. BUT BECAUSE HE STANDS FOR AMERICANS. HIS style of leading is EXACTLY what this country needs UNFORTUNATELY he can't keep his damn mouth shut . So NO I would not vote for him again . But he told AMERICANS there a CHANCE to get our country back from China and the criminals in Washington.
[–]No-Establishment3815 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Lol, you’re a conservative. Nice spin though, you had me going.
[–]AdBeginning676 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I mean, the fact that conservatives feel the need to loudly proclaim they are literally anything other than conservatives or the party of economic collapse and pro-grooming is kinda frightening....
Really shows how heavily a small minority has concentrated power.
[–]knucklz74 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Well Levine claims conservative, hanitity claims conservative theres plenty of the criminals that claim this garbage. Thiefs is all that conservative means in American politics
[–]AdBeginning676 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's a gross misrepresentation, much like saying every progressive is a domestic terror supporting pedophile.
I mean, yes there are honestly Rhino conservatives that are milking the system and then there's an entire news media, the American former vice president, the current vice president, over 30 congressional representatives, multiple multi billion dollar corporations, and of course "activism" groups that all ARE pro domestic terror (so long as it's in the name of their politics) as well as openly praising borderline child pornagraphy and shielding child trafficking...
Wait why are conservatives the bad guys here again?
[–]knucklz74 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No I'm not a conservative . AT ALL.
[–]CursedCrypto 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Being a conservative citizen, and voting for a "conservative" party are not the same. Here in England we have a party literally called the Conservatives, they are branded as the "right wing party", but they are anything but conservative, and their actions are anything but right wing.
Never confuse party politics with personal views, is what I'm getting at. Your own views will be molded by your life choices, but will always fall within an area of the political compass. A political party's views however, will change depending on what they can get out of it at that particular time.
Never be ashamed of what you are, or try to deny what you are to please those that do not understand, that's their problem, not yours.
[–]knucklz74 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well my personal views dictate my politics and neither of these 2 sets of criminals represent mine or 200 hundred million other people clearly or else they'd vote.
[–]pbj_sammichez 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That's a pretty outrageous claim - can you support the notion that this is their purpose? I mean, the feminist establishment, or matriarchy, actually does exist. No question. But the intent of dismantling the nuclear family is going to be hard to prove.
From historical context, I feel like women 100 years ago wanted to feel like they had options in life besides getting married or working in low-paying jobs. That was a real issue 100 years ago. It looks like the matriarchy is working to dismantle the nuclear family because they are still working to solve a problem that was solved with legislation in the 1970's.
A better model of behavior hinges on the assumption that women feel a need to be able to select a mate from a large set of acceptable males. These women wrap that up in entitlement an believe they should have no difficulties (financially, socially, or in custody issues) should a mate become unacceptable. They dont want to dismantle the nuclear family - they want to make it effortless for women to jump in and out of nuclear families on a whim.
[+]knucklz74 -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The feminist movement WAS LITERALLY the only support for this lbtqghkkf shit. And they directly putting in a effort to destroy the nuclear family, with this pronoun shit.
But what you mention they also are doing . It's the exact reason why I married a woman from another country. As well as kidnapping is legal here as long as your the mother of the child. Veryyyyyy rarely are they prosecuted.
[–]SunosUnix 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The "nuclear family" is an abomination anyway. Multigenerational families are much better for... Everything.
[–]knucklz74 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Well the nuclear family the union of a man and a woman . Is the start of a multi generational family ,lol you have to start with 1 man and 1 woman to get to more family
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
This is a semantic misunderstanding.
When referring to the "nuclear family", many people are referring to a particular setup for society that was pushed heavily post WWII, where larger families and communities were split up uniformly into small units of mum, dad and 2 kids, in order to maximise economic consumption and better control the populace.
Most of those arguing to dismantle this setup are not arguing that mums and dads shouldn't be primarily responsible for their own kids. They're not arguing that everyone should be polyamorous or something.
They're pointing out that, prior to the "nuclear family" era, the natural and most common human arrangement was tribes and large family groups with a much higher degree of help and cooperation than we have now. And they're saying that many of the ills we're currently facing are because too many people no longer have access to that wider family / community.
[–]SunosUnix 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
This 💯
The nuclear family as it stands now is a faulty ideology.
[–]knucklz74 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OK got yah ,this is 👍
[–]Whitified -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nuclear family destroyed Patriarchy because women marrying into your family no longer have to obey your parents, only you. Husbands are then "taken care of" by Domestic Violence and Divorce laws.
BAM, now she controls the family.
Your correct , that why YOU DONT MARRY WOMEN WITH WESTERN VALUES. My wife is from Brazil. The toxic femininity is already in the young woman . My wife's older lol. She VERYYYYYY Traditional. Something that is looked down on from toxic women here
[–]whtsnk 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The nuclear family is long overdue to be dismantled.
You’re only upset about that goal because this time it’s the left-wingers who want to do it. In the late 19th century, it was the conservatives who wanted to dismantle the nuclear family, and as old-sounding as their vision sounds to modern ears, I agree with it.
[–]knucklz74 -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Your wrong I have NO LOVE FOR EITHER PARTY. It's a damn shame 70 mil voted for Trump. 80 mil voted for Biden , well if the census is correct 200 mil people were muted BECAUSE WE have absolute disdain for these criminals. And NOOOO IM NOT DOWN WITH SOCIALISM. It's trash. So the majority can't be heard unless we support one of the criminal parties in charge.
[–]whtsnk 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What you're saying has absolutely nothing to do with the nuclear family.
[–]Puzzleheaded_Back255 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This actually became the Official Narrative last year.
[–]Ok-Sort-6294 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh yeah, and father's day becoming the day of "single mothers"
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -13 points-12 points-11 points 2 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
What's a 'real man'
[–]philhalo66 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
no clue, you'd have to ask the UN
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -12 points-11 points-10 points 2 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
What do you think is a real man?
[–]philhalo66 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
what does that have to do with what i said?
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Nothing it's just a question
[–]philhalo66 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
well my vision of a "real man" as you put it is someone who takes responsibility for his actions and takes the initiative to protect his family and home from anyone who would hard either. Someone who isnt afraid to take charge and show people how to do something when needed
[–]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
My vision of a man is someone who father's a child
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Does your vision necessarily exclude every man who is childless, voluntarily or otherwise?
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -7 points-6 points-5 points 2 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
They're not men, they're children themselves
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Physical or metaphysical?
[–]Aman_10003 235 points236 points237 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
This seems like a good thing.
[–]ocket8888 105 points106 points107 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah it is. Not everything posted here is a complaint. Just most.
[–]MNCPA 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It's better than nothing. A low bar...but it's something.
[–]pigcake101 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wait why is this getting downvoted?
[–]deeedeesutts 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Some people suck.
[–]MNCPA 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have no idea. :(
[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 79 points80 points81 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Love that, thanks.
[–]googitygig 84 points85 points86 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I love this. One of my biggest pet peeves is the lack of representation father's get. We've very much always been treated as the secondary parent.
We still are treated that way I suppose but seeing things like this genuinely warms my cold dead heart. We're getting there lads. Slowly but surely.
[–]TheLonelySnail 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
‘Oh are we babysitting today?’
“Hell no lady. That’s my daughter, and I’m her Father. I’m not ‘babysitting’, I’m being a parent.”
[–]FloraIvyThorn 76 points77 points78 points 2 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
This is really sweet, I cant have children of my own, but I've always wanted to adopt when I grow up
[+]ocket8888 -14 points-13 points-12 points 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I cant have children of my own
why not?
[–]cuntdestroyer800028 points 2 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, for me, it's that I don't make sperm. It sucks. Been devastating for me and my wife.
Infertility is really common nowadays. I think due to the plastics and toxic chemicals in our diet and stress.
[–]akmvb21 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm sorry to hear that, my wife and I are going to begin trying in this coming March and I'm terrified about all the things that could be wrong
[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 35 points36 points37 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
LPT: When anyone says "I can't have children of my own" never ever ask why.
[–]akmvb21 44 points45 points46 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LPT: it's always ok to ask questions out of curiosity or genuine sincerity as long as you are ok with taking "that's too personal" or "I'd rather not get into that" as an answer.
[–]ocket8888 29 points30 points31 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What? He brought it up in a public forum, why would you do that if someone asking about it will destroy you on an emotional level?
[–]FloraIvyThorn 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm fine with the question :)
It's because I'm gay, so yeah lol.
[–]ocket8888 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
and I take it the idea of a surrogate doesn't appeal to you (or is too expensive)?
[–]FloraIvyThorn 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yup, both are correct
[–][deleted] 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]ocket8888 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
okay buddy
[–]PaulfussKrile 51 points52 points53 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Awesome! I’m buying these. For once, I’d like to see a book where the father isn’t either absent or incompetent.
[–]morris1022 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would recommend the children's book "My papi has a motorcycle"
[–]blaizken_420 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They care more than google at least
[–]rockstarcrossing 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
International Men's Day. C'mon, Google. Celebrate it
[–][deleted] 65 points66 points67 points 2 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Who’s ready to see all the single moms getting props and “Happy Father’s Day” sentiments? 😂
[–]Shadowdragon409 21 points22 points23 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I don't think theres anything wrong with that on a local scale, but it's definitely not ok for that message to be spread as popular opinion.
[–]YeeHawWyattDerp 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I mean, does one not constitute the other?
[–]Shadowdragon409 -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not really. Let's say that a child never knew their father for one reason or another, or has two mother's. There isn't anything wrong with them thanking their parents and giving them appreciation
[–]YeeHawWyattDerp 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No I meant isn’t a general population opinion just an amalgamation of “local” public opinions?
[–]Shadowdragon409 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but that's not what I meant. People can celebrate their mothers if they either don't have a father, or hate their father, but it's a different story to go on Twitter and wish mother's a happy father's day. You can still wish father's a happy father's day without having a good father.
[–]MartianNamedScotty 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Every year I make the same status on mother's day. Happy Mother's day to single fathers out there pulling both roles, you the real MVP.
While on father's day I make sure to say it to dads and leave the single moms out.
I see nothing wrong with either.
[–]peanutbutterjams 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because custody laws are biased in America and the kids already have a father.
[–]World_Renowned_Guy 32 points33 points34 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I went on a heroin bender a few years ago really badly. Almost threw my whole life away. My wife got me the “why every daughter needs a daddy” and have done a complete turn around since then. I have two daughters. Never going back. Best gift I ever got.
[–]AgincourtSalute 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wholesome! Thank you. And good job for getting your life back together.
[–]Zero20sk8ter 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s a great story man
[–]NoBrick444 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Champion. Your little girls need you.
[–]GodXTerminatorYT 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your wife is a queen bro👑
[–]brianthewizard1 34 points35 points36 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why is this so wholesome?!? I’m so happy these types of books are available! Warms my heart!
[–]BoredRedhead24 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Small amounts of progress are better than none, still a win.
[–]Clockw0rk 37 points38 points39 points 2 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
While I certainly applaud positive change like this, I do wonder what happened to mom?
Do children’s books feature functional men and women relationships anymore? I’m not familiar since I’m not a parent, but it seems like in the little recent children’s media I’ve been exposed to either has LGBT parents, single parents, or parents too busy to participate in the kid’s adventures.
I wonder if we’ve leaned into catering to the minorities so much that we’re no longer teaching what average is and that it’s perfectly okay to be average.
[–]fiercealmond 33 points34 points35 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Nope! You get either single parents or gay parents. If you manage to find media with a mom and dad, the dad's a buffoon. Just another step on the long march to demolish everything about our culture.
[–]Crossingfoxes 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Like in “I Love You, Mommy and Daddy ?
Or Mom, Dad, Our Books, and Me ?
[–]Crossingfoxes 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or My Mum and Dad Make Me Laugh ?
[–]Crossingfoxes 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or God Made Dad & Mom ?
Or My Mom and Dad (My Family) ?
[–]Blitz722 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Late comment, but even if this were true, what culture is that demolishing instead of just perpetuating? Mothers have been seen as the main parent for an extremely long time while dads are either deadbeats or breadwinners. This is not new and representing gay people or single dads is not what you should be mad at.
[–]jakelove12 19 points20 points21 points 2 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Mother’s Day was on the 8th, I’m sure you could have found a bunch of mother themed books and gifts in target then….
Why is it a conspiracy theory for you that fathers day themed books feature fathers?
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I don't think that was their point.
Fathers are most commonly part of a family unit that also includes a mother. We have four books here and none of them seem to show that very common arrangement.
BTW, this is not a complaint about these books or saying these books shouldn't exist. And I don't think it's a conspiracy.
[–]jakelove12 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
So it’s bad that Father’s Day themed books about fathers for Father’s Day are featuring…. fathers?
Would you rather the focus be on mothers?? I feel like a “lets include mom on Father’s Day!!” book wouldn’t be very popular with this sub…
It’s not parents day it’s Father’s Day. The only reason that one has both parents on it is because in families with gay male parents both of those parents are fathers.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Would you rather the focus be on mothers??
Of course not. Geez, not everything has to be antagonistic. Just to be clear, I'm not some tradcon who thinks the nuclear family is the be-all-and-end-all.
These books are great in and of themselves. Kids do, sometimes, spend time with just one parent, which is what we see depicted on these covers (except the gay couple one).
More often, dads are parenting alongside mums, as well as extended family members.
[–]jakelove12 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
What are you even talking about?
Yes most families feature a mom and a dad what on earth is your point and what does this have to do with it somehow being wrong for a book about fathers for Father’s Day featuring fathers?
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
So the only way we can communicate that a book is about fathers is to depict a situation where there is one child with one dad on the cover?
[–]jakelove12 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
You are struggling to make this somehow controversial or give it more meaning than it has.
A book about pineapples would generally be expected to feature a pineapple on the cover. I genuinely don’t understand what you’re even arguing.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
OK, so the answer to my question is yes.
[–]lordtyp0 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
My relationship to my kids doesn't involve anyone else. Each parent SHOULD spend time alone with each of their kids. Reading. Outdoors stuff. Tossing the football. Whatever. The first three books here are simply saying "dad is great!" Not condemning any configuration. Not insinuating anything.
It's things just like "it's fun when we go fishing!".
They do btw have other books. This post is likely a response to any books existing at all, showing that dad matters without mom's supervision.
Yeah, you're right. I don't know what I'm looking for here, just being unnecessarily critical.
u/lordtyp0 explained it well.
[–]lordtyp0 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because there are a lot of MAGAt's secretly afraid they love the peen.
[–]lordtyp0 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
None of these books imply the mother is not involved. The last one (anymore) is likely surrogacy or adoption.
First two imply "only dad can do this part! Yay!". Bottom left is "dad is great!".
Last is "I have two dads!"
The two dads does not talk about sexuality. It talks about the family unit and how it works. It is not sex related anymore than a book with a mother, father, kid is about sex.
Why does a woman have to front and center on fathers day?
[–]Clockw0rk 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think you’re misread me.
I’m not asking for a woman to be “front and center”, I’m wondering why there doesn’t seem to be a mother anywhere. And yes, I would be asking the same thing if the genders and holidays were flipped.
Where is dad in the Mother’s Day children’s books? Maybe it’s unhealthy to focus too much on one parent, or maybe we shouldn’t elevate one parent above the other so much as a holiday. Kind of flies in the face of equality and all that.
[–]lordtyp0 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because children's books tend to be single topic. If it's not germaine, it's not in there.
[+]24cce57a -17 points-16 points-15 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The far-left communist agenda is literally forcing the destruction of the nuclear family, and has been for decades. I'm sorry that you're just now learning this, but the reason our world is so messed up is a direct result of this.
[–]Roro-Squandering 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The nuclear family as we conceive it is a concoction of the 20th century and its so-called destruction is like complaining that you can't buy VHS tapes in store.
[–]Theapexfighter 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
All we hear is
[–]LordFedoraWeed 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Daddy and Dada 👏👏
Daddy and Dodo 👏👏
Daddy and Daaada 👏👏
[–]bubbybyrd 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wholesome post.
Comments are trying to make it seem like corperations are out to forget Father's Day lol. Or trying to shit on Mother's Day, grow up guys come onn
[–]Dirk_94 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wholesome :)
[–]Chocolate_Spaghet 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine having a dad.. haha.. ha..
[–]rahsoft 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
since I believe this is in the USA
perhaps people should buy the top two books in the photo and have it delivered to your local congressmen( and what ever you have at state level)
maybe with a sticker that says something like "get the hint yet?"
followed by "make this( and shared parenting) a reality, or we vote you out..."
[–]Sensitive-Ad6609 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Everyone, calm on the two dads stuff. You realize it is a picture of just four out of possibly an entire section, correct? I hope you all do... Yeah, I am gay. Yeah find that book cute, BUT thankfully I know that is not how oh so many think and all. To me, it also supports the idea of a child waiting to get out of foster care and into a home where the parents/guardians are not looking to get paid from the government or some such because they have the child under their care. Anyway, where I work in no time at all the hallmark vendor set up fathers day things in her area. I smiled and was quite happy to see the items out. No, I do not work at target. Anyway, we have the run of the mill gift sets and all out too. I am just happy that father's day is still celebrated. No matter the structure of the dynamics of the family. Truthfully especially with a man and wife, so calm down and be happy stores have and support (i know, money makers but..) father's day still. If you have a family, spend time with them. Make sure you let them know you love and appreciate them. Hopefully they will do the same for you. I know I love and appreciate my dad, so i am happy we have father's day things out. We both work at the same place, so if i get him anything after work i have to be sneaky. >_> uhm, anyway.. Hope all of this gets read. Have a good one, all.
[–]crazy_days2go 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This makes me soo happy to see the daddy and Dada book. Inclusion for everyone.
[–]Co1dyy1234 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Buying the two books at the top
[–]Great-Flan-5896 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh no it's the patriarchy run for your lives! Read in SpongeBob voice for good times.
[–]pacsatonifil 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All of them great. Love to see them
[–]QuinnTrumplet 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can’t wait for the vice article on this one
[–]Obvious_Cupcake7662 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Most people are sensitive over Father's Day for reasons, mostly with daddy issues.
My old man's not perfect but I'd kill for spending time with him
[–]BuzzOff2011 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not gonna lie to ya'll but I haven't heard shit about fathers day yet here in Canada
[–]tacolover2k4 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cool, 3 books about bears
[–][deleted] 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]haikusbot 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Love the bear and the
Gay one and especially
The gentle monster
- chekkibrekki12
I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully. Learn more about me.
Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete"
[–]QuinnTrumplet 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good bot
[–]hehimCA 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is great.
[–]ArroCoda 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Kings day let's goooo
[–]United_Reality4157 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank god for small mercies
[–]MartianNamedScotty 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
These are all wonderful
[–]frontalmoth 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's nice to see. ☺️
[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Welp! I will be the persom that shall broke the wall and say; '' Bears make terrifyingly terrible dads '' (not joking seriously after two or three documentaries about bears I am convinced that these canine-oids on steroids are psycopaths)
[–]Equal_Confidence_944 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What is Dada? (Legitimate question)
[–]MicroStarBunny 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
sometimes same sex parents get called by different names so that it's less confusing, dad and pop, mom and ma, stuff like that.
[–]wikipedia_answer_bot 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dada () or Dadaism was an art movement of the European avant-garde in the early 20th century, with early centres in Zürich, Switzerland, at the Cabaret Voltaire (c. 1916).
More details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dada
This comment was left automatically (by a bot). If I don't get this right, don't get mad at me, I'm still learning!
opt out | delete | report/suggest | GitHub
[–]Taylor862 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good to see that they have representation for all types of dads. It’s important not only for the dads themselves to see them represented properly but also for the children who have alternative family units to see themselves accepted and represented properly. Love to see it
[–]btmvideos37 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No one NEEDS a dad. They need loving parents. Two moms is fine.
[–][deleted] 2 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordFedoraWeed 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Love that just showing different family-setups is grooming now. What the hell? What about kids who have two dads? How is this shoveling sexuality down kids throats any more than showing a parent with a mom and a dad? Because, surprise surprise, heterosexuality is in fact a sexuality too.
Isn't this sub about men's rights? Aren't gay men allowed those same rights, or?
[–][deleted] 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordFedoraWeed 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How are they "grooming"? Do you even know what that word means? How the fuck are gay couples "grooming" children by.... *checks notes* adopting them and giving them a safe home environment? It's not like every adopted child ever has turned out gay - and when that some times happen, guess what? That's just basic statistics and probability, because people are gay regardless of who their parents are lol.
By this same logic, every single straight couple groom their children into heterosexuality - but I know tons of LGBT people with straight parents. How do you explain that?
[–]Lewbomb 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What the fuck is wrong with you?
[–]FloraIvyThorn 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
what's groomer-like about it?
[+]fiercealmond -10 points-9 points-8 points 2 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Why do people feel the need to shove the sexuality shit down children's throats? They will find out in time. Acceptance is here to stay, we don't need to be endlessly drowning our kids in sexual ideas and propaganda.
[–]Crossingfoxes 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The book includes other types of couples (lesbian, straight, etc.) - but you wouldn’t know that because this is probably the first time you’ve seen the book, right?
And it’s about parenthood - not propaganda 🙄
[–]Lewbomb 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who’s shoving anything down anyones throat? Why is showing that same sex couples who are dads exist propaganda?
[–]vhisic 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
its for kids with 2 fathers... its not about sex.
[–]jakelove12 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
It’s for families with two dads you moron.
[–]Mother-Key582 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Why are you getting downvoted? You’re just speaking the truth. Not sure why we need the obvious homophobia in this post. I thought we were WAY better than that … you know, some kids DO have 2 dads … I agree!
[+]fiercealmond -19 points-18 points-17 points 2 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
If it were for kids with 2 dads, it would be a fucking special order. Not front and center in the father's day display. It's not homophobia, I'm so sick of these bullshit phrases. People are getting fed up with the constant attempts to give sexual content to younger and younger age groups.
[–]Crossingfoxes 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s literally not front and center - but on the bottom right corner. It’s displayed with the other father-related books because they are fathers.
When its 2 dads, you’re suggesting it’s “shoving sexuality shit down children’s throats”. Would you have the same issue with the majority of books that depict heterosexual couples?
[–]The_Sinnermen 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You consider a children's book with two loving parents "sexual content" just because the parents both love men.
You are a homophobe.
[+]24cce57a -16 points-15 points-14 points 2 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. There's nothing normal about having "two dads" in a nuclear family. Having a father and a mother is the normal state of things, as originally created by God.
No one is being homophobic. We are just against the destruction of God's design behind the nuclear family. What is so wrong about that? I don't understand why people get so angry about it.
[–]ocket8888 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
stating why you're homophobic doesn't change that you are.
[–]neoman4426 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your imaginary friend doesn't mean shit. "Boo hoo, Santa will put us on the naughty list if we don't condemn people hard enough". Fuck off
[–]The_Sinnermen 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
That's homophobic. You wanna go the religious nut route ? Fine.
If God created men, then God created some men such that they love other men. God also created assholes that will abandon children. Luckily, God, in his almighty wisdom, made some of the men that he created gay as very generous people. God, all knowing and all powerful, must have therefore planned that those children would be adopted by the generous gay people that he created.
Are you saying that God is wrong?
[+]24cce57a -10 points-9 points-8 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Have you ever read 1 Corinthians 6:9-11? This is God's word, not mine.
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
[–]shadowguyver[S] 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The word homosexual did not exist when the Bible was written. There are scholars who believe it was condemning pedophiles and not loving same sex relationships. Paul made up the compound word people use as homosexual but with out precise context.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2015/08/clobbering-the-confusion-about-1-corinthians-69-10/
[–]ocket8888 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Okay, but I'm atheist. So I don't care what "God" (1st Corinthians is actually just a collection of letters written by Saint Paul, but whatever) has to say about it. So... leave me alone?
[–]Lewbomb 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You’re just religious, that explains it, thanks!
[–]Dirzain 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sounds like you're a reviler, so good luck getting into that heaven you're so interested in.
[–]vhisic 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Then they already know what having two dads is like, moron.
Then so do the other kids, why do they needs books too? IF anything the kids with 2 dads might need this even more. Heck seems like you could probably do with giving it a read so you can understand. Maybe you can get your dad to read it for you if you cant.
[–]jakelove12 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s a book for Father’s Day and some families have two fathers… wtf is wrong with you?
[–]ocket8888 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Could you not say the same for the other books and the families with a single dad? Or actually those just look like they're about "dads" so it would also apply to families with two dads.
Come to think of it, having books about dads at all is grooming, I suppose.
[–]elonmuskdick 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How is a same sex couple grooming?!
[–]shadowguyver[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Are you kidding or being serious?
[–]ocket8888 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
he's serious
[–]theonedilirum 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I grew up without a father. This was extremely difficult for me. I still struggle with it.
[–]ArroCoda 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fathers day is good I'm saying this for Haiku bot let's go fathers.
[–]_MatVenture_ 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well, one of those doesn't belong there...
[–]ChocolateFantastic 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is something that I’m glad is being addressed because kids who grow up with out a father or father figure end up facing a lot of bad things in the future
[–]thnxMrHofmann -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They're not usually taught to be assertive either. I didn't get there until 31 lol men are supposed to be less agreeable than women. But without a father figure, that can change.
[–]Noobinpro 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ya, just caught up in BS. Thank you for the reminder.
[+]TangledGoatsucker -7 points-6 points-5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Playing both sides of the fence. They aren't selling those two-dads books for profit, but for show.
[–]Choadis 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm broken, I had to triple check for loss
[+]Pleasant_Economics97 -21 points-20 points-19 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Still don't shop there. They still peddle sit like the fauci and kamala harris books
[–]Oxynewbdone 23 points24 points25 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Bro this ain't your echo chamber.
[–]Pleasant_Economics97 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You have a good reason for writing a children's book about the man who totally fucked up both covid amd hiv scares? Maybe you're not old enough to remember the bullshit they used to spread about hiv but it was wrong, crazy fear mongering, and it was also all fauci, and Kamala Harris is just a dumb cunt that doesn't deserve a second glance
[+]24cce57a -14 points-13 points-12 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not everyone is a Fauci worshipper or Camel Toe applauder, just FYI.
[–]beetlecakes 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha, get it, camel toe. Because she’s a woman. It’s a very clever and nuanced jab at the fact that she has labia.
Bad bot
[–]AreU4SCUBA -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What the fuck
[+]Noobinpro -21 points-20 points-19 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What the hell is daddy and dada?
Are we supposed to be all happy about another man trying to be are kid(s) father?
I'm about to get heated over this! Oh ya happy early father's day...
[–]AgincourtSalute 13 points14 points15 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The fact that the child is wearing a rainbow shirt makes me think that perhaps this is Dad and Step Dad, and that they are a couple.
[–]Noobinpro 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Good point! And thanks man. In to many situations custody just goes straight to the mother and alienation happens to the father. The new step dad is dad, it's a whole can of worms.
Just stating the obvious while getting ahead, thanks again.
The authors of that book are a married couple with kids.
The book also includes other types of parents (2 moms, mom and dad, etc.)
[–]lordtyp0 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I guess you hate adoption?
[–]Napo5000 13 points14 points15 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You do realize gay people exist right?
[–]0utbox-21 points 2 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Daddy and dada? What BS is that?
[–]Napo5000 21 points22 points23 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know gay people exist right?
[–]Crossingfoxes 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A book regarding a girl having 2 fathers. Is there an issue with those men being fathers?
[+]ch994y -11 points-10 points-9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
disgusting degeneracy
[+]knucklz74 -14 points-13 points-12 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That is absolutely heartbreaking that these books exist.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are you saying it's heartbreaking that anyone needs to be instructed on why kids benefit from a dad?
[–]knucklz74 -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nooo I'm saying in ABSOLUTE DEFENSEOF DADS. It should be no Brainer that Dads areVERYYYY IMPORTANT yet the courts HAVE MADE US NOTHING BUT A DOLLAR BILL . IT FUCKIN PISSES OFF
[+]Dry-Pianist1853 -7 points-6 points-5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Given how fucked the world is and the general feminist nature of corporations like target, I'm have a hard time accepting they actually would cosign books like these
[+]OldSamVimes -11 points-10 points-9 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Should we really be exposing children to gender stereotypes?
Isn't 'Dad' too gender specific for these modernly progressive times?
LOL
[–]GodXTerminatorYT 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean?
Erm… I had it in mid march
[–]NextStopMyAss 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's wonderful. I want to buy the top right book to read with my son. Sadly it likely doesn't have any trains, planes, bulldozers, or trucks in it, so he absolutely would not be interested 😂
[–]Golden_disrepctCo 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
That last confused me is the red guy the dad and the blue guy a step dad or the opposite
[–]Crossingfoxes 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It’s a drawing depicting the authors - Ryan Brockington and Isaac Webster - who are a married couple with kids.
[–]Golden_disrepctCo 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I know I was playing but thanks for info
[–]Crossingfoxes 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There’s several genuine comments on here asking like that so I wasn’t sure 💀😂
[–]tbmepm 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like u.
[–]tacticalslacker 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I got an email from Etsy last year apologizing for Father’s Day marketing emails. Fuck all those people so very much.
Go on? What emails
[–]musaraj 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Looks great, wtp?
[–]HypnotEyes_lonely 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Glad to see someone giving dads the credit that they deserve
[–]manicraccoon 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's super nice.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't understand. What's the issue?
[–]shadowguyver[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm happy they had these.
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Kulovicz1 485 points486 points487 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwawayincelacc 240 points241 points242 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]TangledGoatsucker 40 points41 points42 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 52 points53 points54 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]TangledGoatsucker -29 points-28 points-27 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]vinnyvinnyvinnyvinny 25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]crow_077 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 28 points29 points30 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]testaccount9597 -13 points-12 points-11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]TangledGoatsucker -14 points-13 points-12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GnomeChompy 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]pbj_sammichez -8 points-7 points-6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]TangledGoatsucker -6 points-5 points-4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdBeginning676 -4 points-3 points-2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TangledGoatsucker 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdBeginning676 -4 points-3 points-2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TangledGoatsucker -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]_BeefJerk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]philhalo66 440 points441 points442 points (50 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway3569387340 239 points240 points241 points (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 34 points35 points36 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]TangledGoatsucker 22 points23 points24 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2 22 points23 points24 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]TangledGoatsucker 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LouisdeRouvroy 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]WikiSummarizerBot[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]knucklz74 -6 points-5 points-4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]No-Establishment3815 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdBeginning676 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdBeginning676 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CursedCrypto 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pbj_sammichez 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]knucklz74 -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SunosUnix 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SunosUnix 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whitified -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whtsnk 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]whtsnk 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Puzzleheaded_Back255 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ok-Sort-6294 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -13 points-12 points-11 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]philhalo66 10 points11 points12 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -12 points-11 points-10 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]philhalo66 6 points7 points8 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -6 points-5 points-4 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]philhalo66 6 points7 points8 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -1 points0 points1 point (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]IFeelSorry4UrMothers -7 points-6 points-5 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aman_10003 235 points236 points237 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 105 points106 points107 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MNCPA 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]pigcake101 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]deeedeesutts 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MNCPA 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 79 points80 points81 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]googitygig 84 points85 points86 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheLonelySnail 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FloraIvyThorn 76 points77 points78 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]ocket8888 -14 points-13 points-12 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]cuntdestroyer800028 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]akmvb21 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 35 points36 points37 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]akmvb21 44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 29 points30 points31 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]FloraIvyThorn 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FloraIvyThorn 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PaulfussKrile 51 points52 points53 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]morris1022 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blaizken_420 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rockstarcrossing 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 65 points66 points67 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowdragon409 21 points22 points23 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]YeeHawWyattDerp 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowdragon409 -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]YeeHawWyattDerp 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowdragon409 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MartianNamedScotty 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]peanutbutterjams 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]World_Renowned_Guy 32 points33 points34 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]AgincourtSalute 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zero20sk8ter 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoBrick444 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GodXTerminatorYT 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]brianthewizard1 34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BoredRedhead24 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Clockw0rk 37 points38 points39 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]fiercealmond 33 points34 points35 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blitz722 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 19 points20 points21 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 6 points7 points8 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordtyp0 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordtyp0 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordtyp0 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Clockw0rk 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lordtyp0 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]24cce57a -17 points-16 points-15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Roro-Squandering 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Theapexfighter 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordFedoraWeed 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]bubbybyrd 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dirk_94 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chocolate_Spaghet 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rahsoft 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sensitive-Ad6609 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]crazy_days2go 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Co1dyy1234 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Great-Flan-5896 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pacsatonifil 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]QuinnTrumplet 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Obvious_Cupcake7662 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BuzzOff2011 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tacolover2k4 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]haikusbot 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]QuinnTrumplet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hehimCA 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ArroCoda 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]United_Reality4157 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MartianNamedScotty 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]frontalmoth 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Equal_Confidence_944 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MicroStarBunny 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wikipedia_answer_bot 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Taylor862 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]btmvideos37 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordFedoraWeed 15 points16 points17 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordFedoraWeed 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lewbomb 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FloraIvyThorn 9 points10 points11 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+]fiercealmond -10 points-9 points-8 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lewbomb 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]vhisic 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 10 points11 points12 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mother-Key582 14 points15 points16 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]fiercealmond -19 points-18 points-17 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Sinnermen 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]24cce57a -16 points-15 points-14 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]neoman4426 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Sinnermen 10 points11 points12 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]24cce57a -10 points-9 points-8 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]shadowguyver[S] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lewbomb 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dirzain 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]vhisic 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakelove12 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]elonmuskdick 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shadowguyver[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ocket8888 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theonedilirum 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ArroCoda 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_MatVenture_ 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChocolateFantastic 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thnxMrHofmann -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Noobinpro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TangledGoatsucker -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Choadis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Pleasant_Economics97 -21 points-20 points-19 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oxynewbdone 23 points24 points25 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pleasant_Economics97 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]24cce57a -14 points-13 points-12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]beetlecakes 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]QuinnTrumplet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AreU4SCUBA -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Noobinpro -21 points-20 points-19 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AgincourtSalute 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Noobinpro 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordtyp0 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Napo5000 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0utbox-21 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Napo5000 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]ch994y -11 points-10 points-9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]knucklz74 -14 points-13 points-12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]knucklz74 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Dry-Pianist1853 -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]OldSamVimes -11 points-10 points-9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GodXTerminatorYT 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NextStopMyAss 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Golden_disrepctCo 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Golden_disrepctCo 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Crossingfoxes 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tbmepm 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tacticalslacker 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]musaraj 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HypnotEyes_lonely 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]manicraccoon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shadowguyver[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link