Question for all.

The AF/BB debate usually boils down to the fact that a man is being settled for due to the money and security he offers. According to the same thought process, most women have to do nothing but look fit and be feminine to get a man, because most men will take anything out in front of them. While she’s young she uses this to her advantage, then when both parties are older, she tries to get a man that is now established and secure, where in his youth he was not.

Men would, ideally, date super hot women if they were flocking to them, and/or there were more super attractive women around. Men are told to “take the best looking woman you can find” and be as happy as possible.

Men don’t care as much about personality or views of a woman so long as she doesn’t challenge him or get too much attention from anyone else.

The standards for an acceptable woman are so low. Because there are definitely prettier women that exist, are most men settling too?

Why is this not seen as insulting like the beta situation? Would you really treat a super hot woman that loved you and an average woman that loved you exactly the same?

If not, should your current/future partner be insulted?