~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
MachiNarci
[–]JosieSandiePurple Pill Woman 63 points64 points65 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
When a woman sleeps with a lot of men, she’s a “slut.” When a man does the same thing, suddenly he’s “gay”.
[–]Kimba93 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fantastic comment.
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
QTM who think like this: why would you sleep with a woman that is “fat & ugly”? How is it an achievement for a man to sleep with “fat & ugly” women? So a man who sleeps with lots of 2s can be a stud? Do you men not have any standards?
Makes more sense to have more respect for the woman who sleeps with lots of 10s than the man who sleeps with lots of 2s. It’s not that difficult to sleep with unattractive people. I think also people would have more respect for the men who only slept with those who were actually attractive, even if it means lower n-count. So the double standard doesn’t make sense. Quality over quantity.
[–]EminemLovesGrapesSpongebob 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You'd be surprised how high the standards of unattractive people are.
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But why even sleep with them still? Just because the uglies have standards? Why would you lower your own standards? Sounds like some men’s standards are in hell.
I think it makes more sense for men to see men who have slept only with good quality women as studs rather than high n-count men of which most of their count is probably 2s.
[–]DifferenceEconomyAD -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How that works especially when you consider women still having more sex then men. "As per the chart below, the percentage of young women who hadn't had sex in the previous year increased as well, though not nearly as much as it did for men." https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/ Also a tv show isn't great source of citing information, do you know?
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Makes more sense to have more respect for the woman who sleeps with lots of 10s
In what way? If you have already established that men don't have standards, what is there to respect in the woman simply saying yes? I get what you're saying from the male side, though I already don't particularly respect male sluts either, regardless of what the women they're sleeping with look like. But I can understand the very simple concept that he had to put in work to get any of those women.
Not all women can sleep with a 10 guy. If the woman is a 6, she def had to put in some work because 10 guy can get anything higher than her easily too. Look at those Too Hot To Handle people, I’m sure those men can get about any girl. I don’t think they would settle for a 6, even just as ONS.
People should do what they want, but I don’t believe the double standard is justifiable. Male sluts exist too.
[–]Snivelingincel 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It’s harder for any man to sleep with a lot of 2’s than it is for any woman to sleep with a lot of 10’s
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
No it’s not.
Men like Creed from THTH can sleep with any girl. Surely he wouldn’t give any girl under 9 the time of day and why should he? A 6 could never with this guy. Most women, like most men, are far from being a 10.
[–]Willow-girlReusable Hag 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why do men assume that sluts sleep with random guys? That would indeed be easy. But sluts are usually trying to cut the prettiest pony from the herd, and that's a bit more tricky. For one, you have a lot of competition. It's not as easy as it seems.
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Is it fair that women can’t do it without being shamed? No. Is it fair that 90% of men can’t do it at all? Also no. Life is not fair.
[–]kvakerokEvolved RP "Chadlite" 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Let's just establish that whoever expects life to be "fair" is severely lacking in the upstairs department.
[–]Ohms2North 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yes it's fair that women can't do it without being shamed. Being a slut means having a combination of low morals and a lack of self-control. To be a stud requires skill and dedication
[–]DiamondLilyD 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So? they're is ZERO pride in being an STD ridden slut.
[–]Impossible-Bank-1697 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What self control or moral got to do with been sexually attractive to someone and having sex with them? It’s very simple both wanted to have sex so it happened.
[–]Ohms2North 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You could have typed anything into the box and you decided to type this
[–]Impossible-Bank-1697 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah ?!!
[–]RegularDue9718 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's only shameful if you let it be shameful.
You can't call a stud a slut because he will be like "whatever" and move on. It doesn't matter to him that he's a slut
[–]Shazoa 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's only true of anything until the perception of others begins to impact you. If people start to shun you for your behaviour, for example, and that matters to you in one way or another.
Men can usually shrug off that label easily because barely anyone thinks badly of it to begin with. There is no stigma to shirk. But if a man does get a 'reputation' and lives somewhere small enough for people to take notice, it can materially affect their life.
[–]AnykindoflandIt's your looks, really 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not being fair for anyone makes it fair again.
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link
To be slut is easy but you get shamed and ridiculed for it. To be a stud is hard but you praised and glorified for it. Men or redpill men are mad at women cause they don't have to work hard for sex cause that's an issue most men face. But you aren't looking at the entire context as like I said, most women get mocked and ridiculed for being hoes, doesn't matter how many guys are in your DMS, if you gonna be mocked for getting with all. This is why these kinds of women are picky, tons of options, can only choose one.
[–]RegularDue9718 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I was told actually only incels on Reddit cared about N count. So women aren't shamed because incels probably have no male or female friends to talknto
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
That's just a lie and I don't know how to convince you otherwise. It's just a basic social norm for women to mocked and ridiculed for being with lots of men. Both men and women shame slutty behaviour. In social circles and social spaces, this rule applies.
[–]RegularDue9718 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Why do people insult eacher other? To cause pain. What if women liked to be called "sluts"? What would happen? I think people would find other ways to insult them
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The word slut is usually used in a degrading nature. Societal shame and devaluation is a feature of being called a slut. You can understand why most women want avoid societal shame and devaluation. No friends, no respect, constant slander, etc.
Tons of women have tried to create a positive connotation and context to the word but it's goes in and out of positive and negative connotations, showing most women can't fully enjoy or embrace the word. For example, if your friends call you a slut in playful way, it's endearing but if a stranger called you that, the negative context of slut is implied.
[–]Treacle-Flimsy 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Tons of women
Tons of sluts. Fixed it for ya
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nope, its quite easy to see most women and most of feminism supports women being promiscuous. That doesn't translate supporting ≠ being a slut.
Despite feminism and women friendship circles doing this, what I said above happens. Go back and forth between changing contexts.
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If you're not a slut, and have no desire to be a slut, then you wouldn't care about slut shaming.
But you seem to not understand why people get praise for doing something difficult, so...
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean you can support a lifestyle without wanting to be apart of that lifestyle.
I didn't make any comment on men being praised for doing something difficult other stating that fact men get praised for doing something difficult.
[–]Sad_Entertainer63121 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
No friends, no respect, constant slander, etc.
Loads of dick though
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Not worth it for many women, a lot of those woman aren't talked on social media. Since redpill is being pushed into the mainstream rn.
[–]justforlulz12345Jester Pill 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you go gay you can fuck as many femboys as you want or get fucked by chad as much as you want. True freedom
[–]howdoiw0rkthisthingsugar-pilled 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m now enlightened tyvm
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
This is just cope lmao . If u the wanna be a man wh0re, do it in peace. But don’t try to shame women who are just like you.
[–]TigerRude4 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women are just not like him, that's the entire point.
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
?
[–]BridgeBurner22 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
But don’t try to shame women who are just like you.
When a woman and a man are both sleeping around, the only thing that is the same for both of them is the way we label their activities. It's called sleeping around for both genders. But what a man and a woman are doing to be able to sleep around have nothing in common with each other and couldn't be further apart. There isn't any "just like you" when you compare a promiscuous man to a promiscuous woman. Every step of the process of sleeping around is completely different for both genders.
A person who was born poor and worked real hard to become rich isn't "just like" a trust fund baby who was born into the same richness. Yes they are both rich, but that's where the comparisons end. Only one of them will be respected for being rich (the one who overcame disadvantages and worked hard for it) and the other will get envy or indifference for being rich (because they were given their succes, they did nothing to earn it they just rolled into this world out of a wealthy vagina). Same goes for sleeping around. Sex is given to women and earned by men. There is no just like you.
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
You typed a paragraph only to explain that absolutely nothing. If you’re a man who sleeps around you’re a man who sleeps around. If you’re a woman who sleeps around, you’re a woman who sleeps around. It doesn’t matter how much you wanna cope about your insecurities and how it’s allegedly more easier for women to seep around.
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If you are a heterosexual man who sleeps around, you are sleeping with women. If you are a heterosexual woman you are sleeping with men. People who complain about the "double standard" when it comes to promiscuity, are saying that sleeping with men is the same thing as sleeping with women. It clearly isn't. You refusing to address any of the points I made and responding with sad attempts at insult says enough...
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It clearly is. There is no difference. You’re having sex. That’s what it is.
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Having sex with women, is clearly a different activity from having sex with men. You are only using half the words to make it sound like it is one and the same thing. We aren't talking about sex in general. We are talking about why there is a difference in judgement on men having sex with women and women having sex with men.
[–]spicyelgato 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nooooo but it's not okay for females to do it (I'm a man child)
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Literally
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Y’all literally have worse nitpics..you literally have to better then the women entirely for a relationship to go smoothly
[–]DicamVeritatemRed Pill Man 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It is a double standard rooted in biology, not in socialization.
[–]BridgeBurner22 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's not a double standard. You need the same activity being judged differently, in order for it to be a double standard. And sleeping around with the opposite gender is a different activity based on what your own gender is. A heterosexual man who is sleeping around, isn't doing the same thing as a heterosexual woman who is sleeping around. Since they are doing different things (sleeping with women for the man, sleeping with men for the woman) you cannot call the difference in judgement a double standard.
[–]LupeDyCazari 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not really. These days with how degenerate the western world is, almost any guy can get laid. How these kids fail at something so basic, baffles me to no end. I guess that is what happens when boys are raised without a father in the family LMAOOO.
Shit, even my pastor of a dad is more of a man than what these dudes have in their lives, growing up.
[–]KommandaKoopa 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“If a guy sleeps with loads of women, he’s a player, he’s a stud, he’s admired. But if a woman sleeps with loads and loads of men, she’s called Rack’s mum.”
[–]OnePotatoeChip 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dunno, man. Even as a dude, this logic doesn't track. Putting effort into X thing doesn't suddenly make X thing praiseworthy or noble. We first need to establish if X is a good or bad thing. If it's bad, then that just means you're putting effort into something that's bad. Like, we're not even talking about the behavior, but the ease at which someone can engage in the behavior. It's weird.
[–]ffandyy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Are we pretending there aren’t lots of average guys out there with high n counts?
[–]xzpw30s/M/USA/HENRY/blackpill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
We aren’t talking about gay bros.
[–]ffandyy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know
[–]spicyelgato 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
Okay? Something being easy doesn't mean you should be shamed for doing it. That's stupid. Also that premise is bullshit. You're nuts stuck in an echo chamber of bitter misogynistic incels who can't get laid due to being pieces of shit.
[–]propagandudumb bitcharooni pizza 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
A slut got triggered
[–]spicyelgato 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lmfaooo I've literally only been with one person. You don't have to be a "slut" to see the misogyny and hypocrisy of this pathetic sub.
[–]Jaktenba 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's not hypocrisy because it's not the same. As another commenter wonderfully put it, you wouldn't treat a trust fund kid the same as someone who started lower class (or even middle class) and was able to rise to upper class. They are both rich, but the journey wasn't the same.
Also, if this is all about your soggy knees (over something you have complete control over, by the way), then would penis shaming be misandry? Or we can keep it more on point and ask if calling men "dogs" or "players" instead of "studs" is misandry. Do you even believe in misandry as a concept?
[–]propagandudumb bitcharooni pizza 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seething lol
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why are you here then?
[–]Pastakingfifth 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I agree that shaming people is bad but it is a valid explanation.
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
It is also a false explanation. That’s not the reason for the way things are. These are the dumb speculations of idiots that are new to this planet and have no interest in even glancing at all the history that built this precedent.
[–]Pastakingfifth 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I mean the historical reason is only men with power and status could sleep with many women so it was correlated that if you could then you must be a powerful man. Women had value through strategic alliances with powerful families so if your daughter was caught sleeping around it would ruin your family's reputation.
The biological context is similar where females push evolution forward by selecting the males with the most desirable traits to mate with.
Do you think I'm right or do you have another explanation, I'm curious to hear.
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Do you think I’m right or do you have another explanation, I’m curious to hear.
Sure.
I mean the historical reason is only men with power and status could sleep with many women so it was correlated that if you could then you must be a powerful man. Women had value through strategic alliances with powerful families so if your daughter was caught sleeping around it would ruin your family’s reputation.
The historical context you explained is correct, but that really only accounts for the environment of the wealthy, peasants had no such ability to forge strong ‘alliances’.
It’s a harder connection, there’s no biological traits that would enforce monogamy.
The biological context gets misrepresented by those who want to force concepts to fit modern day structure and thinking.
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, you're right but I think that's why it's a great explanation since in the general public being manwhore makes you a very dubious character, not exactly an admired stud. Only in some niche circles is it praised. In general, being a righteous man and providing for one woman and your children made you a more positive force in society and that made you respected by your peers(only today is that starting to become a simp thing and only in some circles like here really.) Even for the higher class as far as I understand, they could hardly admit it publically as it would destabilize society overall and it was more like an open secret type thing.
It’s a harder connection, there’s no biological traits that would enforce monogamy. The biological context gets misrepresented by those who want to force concepts to fit modern day structure and thinking.
I think the biological and evolutionary psych concept is like basic might makes right. If you have a lot of females you must be the best male because the other males literally aren't powerful enough to kill you and take your females otherwise they would.
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yep. Appealing to be higher class than you are has always been a thing, so poors taking their lead from the rich is no surprise.
I think the biological and evolutionary psych concept is like basic might makes right. If you have a lot of females you must be the best male because the other males literally aren’t powerful enough to kill you and take your females otherwise they would.
I think there’s too little and conflicting information to lean one way or the other. Laymen tend to contextualise evo-psyche through the lense of their current culture, I think that’s what you are doing. But while it is true that our ancestors had to “induce potential mates to choose them,” for example, such a description is too abstract to provide any clear indication of the nature of human psychological adaptations.
The adaptive problems faced by early humans were not independent of their environment and lifestyle, and we have little evidence of the conditions under which early human evolution occurred.
We just don’t know enough.
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think there’s too little and conflicting information to lean one way or the other. Laymen tend to contextualise evo-psyche through the lense of their current culture, I think that’s what you are doing.
Very true, fair enough. I'm always trying to learn more as it's both very helpful and fascinating but who tf knows lol.
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I just don’t think it’s worth a discussion without a time machine.
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think anthropology is the closest thing we can get to that. I wanna study Frans de Waal, apparently he did good work studying the relationship between how chimps and humans show remarkably similar behavior and how it can teach us about the functioning of our lymbic brain.
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I hope you understand that good looking men who are woman hating misogynists, who see women as sexual objects to conquered for pleasure and nothing else still have copious amounts of sex
This retort women always have that being a piece of shit is why you can’t get laid is plaid out and factually inaccurate
[–]DicamVeritatemRed Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The memes write themselves here.
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Sure, but then maybe we should stop pretending passing from hand to hand is something to be proud of.
Also, maybe women would be shamed less if they themselves stopped using their privilege to humiliate men for being virgins. You didn't earn your sexual success, you did 0 of the work, so like stop giving men shit for having to actually learn how to play the game instead of being given cheat codes.
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
humiliate men for being virgins.
Who does that?
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Lots of people, but to women that's the go to insult
[–]DiamondLilyD 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No, women use incel as the go to insult.
There's a huge difference between incel and virgin.
[–]Jaktenba 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol!
First, the term "incel" only came around recently.
Second, there's only a huge difference if you choose to add all kinds of nonsense. While an incel doesn't have to be a virgin, and a virgin can be one by choice (or even asexual, which would pretty much preclude them from being an incel), they often overlap. The most basic definition of "incel" is simply: someone that is INvoluntarily CELibate. So if you were married, and your partner was in a coma, you would be an incel if you wanted sex at any point during that time.
Third, you're just lying if you wish to claim "virgin" wasn't the go to insult before "incel" was coined.
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nope, annoy a woman and her go to insults to hurt a man will be either his penis size or his lack of success with women, aka getting sex, which usually translates into calling them a virgin.
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No it doesn't.
A man who is desperate for sex and who doesn't regret it is the subject of ridicule.
You interpreting this as virgin shaming is just wrong.
Women don't like promiscuous men.
Nope, women don't like guys who are desperate, true. But they absolutely will make fun of, or at least think lowly of, grown men who are virgins. And if said man does something that pisses her off? You can bet she will use that as an insult.
No, you just don't want to admit women are cruel and do this often.
Sure, but that doesn't mean they like virgins either. The type of women who do are VERY specific, and it's almost always related to kink.
Women find men past the age of 20 who are virgins to be much less sexually attractive. Their are copious amounts of stories on the internet by virgins who can confirm this fact. Their are also copious amounts of videos on the internet asking women this question which confirm it
A lot of women are turned off by an adult male virgin and assume something must be wrong with him that he couldn’t achieve sex or don’t want to waste their time with someone who is sexually inexperienced
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
To not be a slut, you just have to be a good liar 😘
[–]BridgeBurner22 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
It ain't that easy. A slut can lie about her past, but she can't stop herself from being what she is and will slip up in the present or in the future. Sluts are gonna slut. Sooner or later the facade comes down, hopefully before rings are involved.
[–]Dafiro93 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Sure, if the guy also gets around but she's definitely going to get away with it to simps/losers who don't fuck around.
Hopefully those simps have more experienced friends then.
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Why would a guy have to get around, to hear about a woman's past. Even if your argument is that male slots know the signs of a female slut, that doesn't preclude chaste men from learning the signs in less direct neans.
[–]Dafiro93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Because you're not going to hear about a women's past while playing videogames in your bedroom. Now if you hang in the same circles as these women, it becomes obvious what's going on.
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because there are only two options, slut or homebody.
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I literally block some out in my head like they never happened. I like being innocent so I’m pretty good at coming off like that.
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ah yes, a relationship built on lies is surely the best and most stable.
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, I just don’t talk about it
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Good strategy for past indiscretions, but won't work on what your slutty side does in the present or the future. Your best bet is dating an inexperienced man who still believes in romance. They are easily deceived. Any man worth his salt will have a working slut radar.
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nah, I don’t have a slutty side. I do want romance. Right now trying again with my ex HVM.
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nah, I don’t have a slutty side.
and
Blocking out past experiences in order to be able to appear more innocent, is pretty pointless if you don't have a slutty side. You are contradicting yourself.
I’m not slutty as in I’m not partying and having one night stands. But I have an n count and regret some of the guys I fell for.
[–]WestCombSplit 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Depends on how you were a slut. If you were partying everyday for years, then it's hard to hide that. But if you're the type that hunts Men and is quick to sex then yh you could hide that
Good point. Yes, I’ve always been wanting to get married. Lots of relationships, never one night stand.
[–]Urbanwitch666 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It's unfair because sex is enjoyable and nobody deserves to be punished for enjoying it. And, no studs without sluts.
[–]WestCombSplit 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
And, no studs without sluts.
What is a guy was the second guy she'd ever been with and he was that to 100 Women? Boom, you have stud and no sluts
[–]Urbanwitch666 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That's not a real scenario though is it.
I didn't realise we could just pull fantasy out of our butt holes to support statements, I'll do that more often 😂
[–]WestCombSplit 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Fine
Your statement is predicated on the idea that every Woman a stud fucks is a slut. How would you know the amount of guys those women have fucked? Unless you're suggesting most women are sluts and therefore most of the Women he'd end up sleeping with are sluts?
If anything your original statement was based on "pull fantasy out of our _____ to support statements"
[–]Urbanwitch666 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wait, what is your definition of stud? I don't think of a stud as being a moderate n count but high.
Women who are low n count/reserved don't put out. That's how they keep it low. They wait for serious dating or relationships. A stud wouldn't be very successful there - he'd have to do serial monogamy.
So yeah imo a stud sleeps mainly with sluts.
It's not fantasy darling I've lived experience of being a slut 😂 I'm not ashamed. My past is messy.
Let's put some numbers to this. I'd say the beginning of being a stud imo is 50 Women by 30. A low n count woman imo is less than 10. So what I'm saying is that she ain't waiting 6 months and plenty of dates to fuck all 9 of those guys. Guys that fucks a lot of women don't just fuck on the first date or leave. They're also the guy that'll wait a bit fuck and then leave or change personality
darling
Just out of curiosity do you find it offensive if a guy calls you sweetheart or darling?
[–]Urbanwitch666 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I get what you're saying but realistically they fuck a lot of sluts to get there. Otherwise it's still time consuming. I guess we're getting pretty hypothetical here, more studies needed lmao.
I have nothing agaisnt people being studs or sluts as long as they're having a good time. Unfortunately it often seems to come from a bad place but that isn't my business. Sex is great, enjoy it if you can.
I was saying darling in a flamboyant gay voice, to give it context. I don't mind pet names if it's meant playfully. I am not being ultra serious.
[–]the_butter_lord 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This talking point provides a convincing reason for praising men who are "studs" but doesn't provide a convincing reason for shaming women who are "sluts".
I certainly don't admire sluts the same way I admire studs, but I don't have anything against sluts either.
[–]Cult_of_ChadSex Master 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Some of my best ruts have been with fat, ugly studs. 🤷
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
This man is unattractive and poor, yet still has 21 kids:
https://www.wvlt.tv/2021/03/16/kpd-asking-for-help-to-find-suspect-in-rape-burglary-investigation/
[–]BigZaddyZ3 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
No he isn’t. Even your own link says he’s 6’0 tall, at a healthy weight (220), and he has good facial features and facial harmony. He’s a typical Tyrone.
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
He doesn't have good facial features, he would have been rated very bad on OKCupid and you know it.
[–]BigZaddyZ3 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
He does tho. A very compact mid-face is scientifically proven to be attractive to women. He has no abnormal facial features and his face is harmonious. He has a very masculine look. While also having clear skin and a decent head shape. He doesn’t seem to have any facial recession or poor development skull wise. I don’t see any legitimate facial flaws tbh. If you do then feel free to enlighten me. Obviously he’s no model, but he’s an objectively attractive guy. His 21 kids serve as proof of that. So what you’re arguing doesn’t even make sense at the surface level.
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
How many matches do you think he would get on dating apps?
Is this unemployed man who has 10 kids with 10 different women a Chad? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meet-the-man-who-has-10-children-248565
[–]BigZaddyZ3 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Lol yeah, that dude is a Chad as well. He literally looks like MGK or some other Chad singers lmao. He has lean angular features and good forward growth. No facial deformities. (A good eye area as well).
Just out of curiosity, what exactly are you defining as a Chad? Both of the guys you posted are clearly in the upper echelons of attractiveness. How do you think they are even managing to pull this type of shit off?
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Lol yeah, that dude is a Chad as well.
Ridiculous. Here are other pics of him, he is not attractive and only gets women who are not attractive either.
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5432566.ece/ALTERNATES/n310p/PAY-Keith-Macdonald.jpg
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5432596.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/PAY-Keith-Macdonald.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/08/12/29720BC200000578-0-image-a-38_1433761992056.jpg
He would probably get close to zero matches on Tinder.
How do you think they are even managing to pull this type of shit off?
By being very outgoing, drinking a lot of alcohol, talking to a lot of women and having very low standards.
[–]BigZaddyZ3 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Okay, I can admit the guy doesn’t look nearly as good in those other pics…. Still tho, he does have a few “Chad features” and that’s really all you need at a decent height. You don’t literally have to be a male model to fuck women bruh. That’s just incl copium. Both of these guys are *attractive enough to pull a lot of women. So don’t start with the bluepill copium “outgoing” bullshit. Neither guys is actually ugly.
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You don’t literally have to be a male model to fuck women bruh.
Indeed, being of average looks is enough to fuck tons of women. That was my point.
So don’t start with the bluepill copium “outgoing” bullshit.
Considering that he actually has 40 kids now, he's definitely very outgoing. There can't be any doubt to that. I bet if he had a job he already wouldn't have enough time to meet so many women.
[–]BigZaddyZ3 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, in general you do need at least some Chad features, decent height/dick size, neurotypical personality, and to be in decent shape. (Which would put both of those guys in the upper echelon of attractiveness still.) That was my point. Those guys aren’t unattractive to begin with. Which blows your theory apart. Being a stud is way too difficult for most guys to pull off. (Which is why it’s respected. That was OP’s point.)
So, while I agree you don’t have to be a literal model to be a stud, I disagree that the average guy can do it. If what you were saying was true, this forum wouldn’t even exist. There’d be no “Redpill/Bluepill/Blackpill” etc. Every guy would be out slaying just as much pussy as the two guys you posted. Yet both men made the news due to how rare their lives are. That kind of says it all doesn’t it?
[–]jobbo321 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not unattractive at all
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I actually meant not attractive. He definitely isn't a guy who could work as a model, don't pretend otherwise.
[–]jobbo321 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agree, I guess he's dead average for his age and race.
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
An accused rapist is your example of how easy it is for law-abiding men to get sex?
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
His likely hyper aggressive masculinity compensates for his average looks but even then he isn’t ugly. He has a rather masculine face.
His testosterone levels are probably a few standard deviations above the average male. Especially if he’s raping women.
He’s probably not trying to fuck so many women but he certainly has the status of being a dominant male in his environment which leads to him fucking many women. Women are attracted to hypermasculine criminal bad boys.
He put in the effort of risking his life to be more dominant than most men in his environment. Violent crime is not a very intelligent strategy but it is indicative of dominance. Most men are not going to go this route to achieve dominance so they won’t get the results.
He is a rare individual relative to his environment, engaging in behavior that separates him from his peers and likely brings him social status. Not a very sustainable strategy but it makes sense why a guy like this fucks.
If you showed a short, weak, highly inhibited, ugly, Reddit poster with 21 kids you’d have a better point.
The guy in your link is stereotypically hyper masculine
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
So first it's about looks, then money can do it too, then social status can do it too, and now a low-inhib personality can do it too. Now wait until you find out that there are short, physically weak guys with friendly personalities who are in poly relationships and regularly fucking different women in swinger clubs.
So why not just say it? Personality matters. Or, basically, not being a social shut-in matters.
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I never said none of those things matter. I’m of the opinion all of those things matter and if you are in the top percentile of any one of those things you will likely have greater than average success with women
It’s well documented that low inhib dominant men have more sex than most people. This isn’t a revelation. Gang members on average have more sex than most people for this reason.
There simply isn’t as many short weak dudes who are average in every conceivable area who are fucking tons of women.
All the traits you mentioned are traits relevant for sexual success. Guys who fuck large numbers of women are usually way above average in one or many of the areas that important for sexual success.
If you could just be an average guy and get tons of pussy there would be no epidemic of rising male virginity in the west. You wouldn’t have copious amounts of stories of men lamenting how difficult it is to get casual sex.
You’re also acting like I’m some alien. I’m a guy, I know very many men, most guys are not capable of fucking even 10 new women a year.
[–]Kimba93 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Guys who fuck large numbers of women are usually way above average in one or many of the areas that important for sexual success.
You mean, for example way above average in low-inhibness? People who are low-inhib enough to be very outgoing, ask many women out, don't feel crushed after rejections, etc.? Yes, that's what I mean. Personality matters the most. Either for dominant men who have many FWB or soft men who are in poly/swinger relationships.
there would be no epidemic of rising male virginity in the west.
There isn't. 90% of men lose their virginity before 20, and 95% before 25: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf
You wouldn’t have copious amounts of stories of men lamenting how difficult it is to get casual sex.
If you're not low-inhib.
And by the way, there is a big difference between "it's difficult for all non-Chads to get any sex at all" and "it's difficult to get casual sex if you have absolutely no above-average qualities in any regard."
I’m a guy, I know very many men, most guys are not capable of fucking even 10 new women a year.
Surely it's because their personality is not low-inhib enough. Not very outgoing, not very confident, easily crushed after rejections.
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, I’m not sure what you’re arguing.
Most people aren’t hyper social and low inhib. Most guys are too scared to go up to a girl they don’t know and shoot their shot. I agree that people who exhibit high degrees of extroversion and confidence fuck more than the average amount of women. Most guys are not like that.
The average lifetime partner count for an American male is somewhere around 7. Most guys are not capable of fucking tons of women without putting in a concerted effort to improve themselves in some significant area important to women.
Most women are capable of fucking tons of guys with zero effort.
Any dude that is fucking tons of women is either a natural and this is a small percentage of the population or they have put in a lot of effort to separate themselves from the average man.
Average dudes are not capable of achieving very high partner counts like average women are, hence why we generally laud men who can get laid a lot. Men who can get laid a lot are usually exhibiting above average qualities in a few areas and that leads to men respecting them more.
I never said non chads don’t get sex at all, but the dudes doing crazy numbers in regards to sexual partners are usually chads or at least significantly above average in a few areas whether that be social skills, social dominance, extroversion, financially, social status, etc.
Gigacope. Most women aren’t hyper social and low inhib. Most women are too scared to meet a man they don’t know and have sex with him. I agree that women who exhibit high degrees of extroversion and confidence fuck more than the average amount of men. Most women are not like that.
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
It’s not a matter of if they are like that or not. It’s that it requires significantly less effort for women to fuck a bunch of guys than men.
There have been social experiments on this. A woman will go around blatantly asking men if they want to have sex and will receive a yes over 50% of the time, while when the man did it it he received a no basically 100% of the time
A woman doesn’t need to be hyper social and low inhib to fuck tons of guys, all she has to do is go up to guys and ask.
You have to be hyper social and low inhib as woman to go to strangers and ask for sex. Most women are nervous when a man asks them out for a date, so they won't be confident enough to just ask strangers for sex.
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It doesn’t change the fact it takes them no effort whatsoever to do so. I’ve met plenty of very attractive very social women. They could easily ask guys for sex, it’s not that they’re too scared to do so, they simply don’t want to.
Women are not highly regarded for sleeping around because it’s literally that easy for them. Not every woman is the type to be nervous around men. Most women are rejecting men asking them out on dates, not getting nervous.
[+]kellydayscruff -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (59 children) | Copy Link
False. On both counts.
Tinder can get any tall, attractive guy laid on an almost daily basis. No charm or nice shoes necessary. And a woman who is morbidly obese is not getting male attention, she may legitimately struggle to find 10 sexual partners during her lifetime. Sexual discretion benefits everyone, however sexual indiscretion hurts women far more.
[–]gugabe 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
she may legitimately struggle to find 10 sexual partners during her lifetime
You've clearly never been onto the dating app of an unattractive female friend. It's insane how low the floor is.
[–]kellydayscruff -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Nope Im not talking about being unattractive. Im talking about being obese to the point of near handicap.
[–]gugabe 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
There's likely a tipping point of morbidity where it's no longer the case, but I know some big girls who still get plenty of likes.
Lizzo-big is still getting DMs on Tinder.
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Lizzo is chubby and a bit disproportionate. She is still able to move and dance no problem. Im talking about actual obesity.
[–]gugabe 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're talking about morbid/disability-level obesity, which is more of a ? I'm sure there is eventually a tipping point but I think it's probably further out than you'd think it is.
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lets find out right now. How many morbidly obese women have you fucked?
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lizzy "chubby"? Damn the incels might be right. Lizzo is pretty damn obese.
[–]Dafiro93 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, and my dad is the King of the United States. Lizzo is like a few workouts from heart failure.
Ive seen lizzo perform a dance routine while playing an instrument and sing. Im 90% sure she is in better shape than you.
Lizzo is wider than she is tall, she is definitely obese.
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lizzo is almost 6 feet tall. She is most certainly not wider than her height
She looks very rollable.
[–]Shadowcat1606 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Do you have any idea how many guys are out there who would climb just about everything that has a pulse?
Do morbidly obese women have limited options? Sure. Are these options as limited as those of a morbidly obese guy? Not even close.
[+]kellydayscruff -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Being willing to fuck anything doesnt mean that the feelings are reciprocated. A slut can fuck a lot of guys but that doesnt mean she is gonna fuck everyone who approaches her for sex.
[–]Shadowcat1606 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. But she could. Doesn't work the other way round.
[–]Pastakingfifth 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
And a woman who is morbidly obese is not getting male attention, she may legitimately struggle to find 10 sexual partners during her lifetime.
That's legit not even close to being true, SSbbw is literally a genre of porn. Men will fuck females of every variety. 500 lbs, midgets, handicapped, psychopathic, autistic, disfigured, 80 years old, etc.
Of course, it's not the end all be all and the quality probably won't be top notch but there is not a single female on this planet that could not get dick the same day wanted it. Maybe she doesn't know how to and has weird mental blocks around it sure but if a 500 lbs woman goes on tinder or Fb dating and asks guys to come fuck her she can get laid in 2 hours guaranteed.
[–]angryearth😺multipass -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link
Then why don’t incels pick up an 80 year old grand ma and quit complaining?
[–]Pastakingfifth 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
I mean I'm not saying a 20-year-old incel would jump at the chance to fuck an 80-year-old (maybe some lol) but probably a 60-year-old divorced guy type thing. What I'm saying is any woman can open up her dating app and get matches whereas a lot of guys literally get 0.
I don't think most women understand how skewed it is. Have you seen this video with an 18-year-old being given the Tinder account of a man as a test and literally getting slightly depressed from it?
how many morbidly obese women have you slept with?
What color is your Lamborghini
[–]angryearth😺multipass -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Then do an experiment of an 80 year old woman on a dating app and see how many matches she gets.
[–]warramite 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
A similar one was already done with an obese 69 year old woman she got hundreds of matches and tons of Chads and normies messaging her
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Oh a you tube video.
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Yes.. Thats how OLD Experiments are shown to others.. Through videos.
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
That video is a fucking mess.
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Its reality. Men are cheap and easy, we have very low standards
I'm gonna hope this one is fake and the guy switched out pictures because otherwise oof. but like in a realistic version of this I'm quite sure she would easily get dozens of matches with 45-70-year-old guys.
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Its real cause you can see some guys calling her granny
[–]Pastakingfifth 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Dude, you're totally right I hadn't read the chats in detail lmao. I don't think human sexuality is really understood well cuz it seems a lot of young good looking guys that seem like they had options were totally dtf. And I've totally looked at mature porn myself so who knows, the wall is too simplistic a concept.
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Many milf hunters out there.. some of these guys are clearly Chads and even THEY are simping for a 69 year old obese woman
Insane to think what that means for the market
That would actually be a hilarious video, people would freak the fuck out if an 80-year-old woman got more matches than an average 18-year-old dude. I bet she would tbh lmao. The average young guy has like less than 20 matches so it's not exactly a hard competition.
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Name 10 books
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Too high.
Name 9 books
[–]rootsnyder 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Any tall attractive guy laid? Absolute bullshit. More like apex supermodel looks for that to even be in the range of possibility, and even then it takes more coercion then incels think it does in their chad-fishing experiments, because they never actually take those women to the finish line.
[–]kellydayscruff 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
you guys have to stop defaulting to throwing around buzzwords like incel when you disagree with a comment or perspective. It doesnt accomplish anything.
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
And you have to learn how to read. His jab at incels wasn't really directed at the comment he responded to.
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
dude we are on reddit, everyone knows how to read. These responses are so uninspired and boring. Find a way to be more interesting.
You may be able to recognize the words, but you clearly can't understand them. Or else you wouldn't have wrote the first comment I replied to.
wouldnt have *written
[–]rootsnyder 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol if I were using it as an insult I could understand you. Im not I'm using it as a description towards the groups that self label themselves as incels and do Chad Fishing experiments 😂.
[–]austin1011231 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Morbidly obese women could fuck 10 guys a week on tinder, not a lifetime.
[–]kellydayscruff -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
doubt it
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, and how many obese women there are compared to the number of men who have no luck in those apps? These two scenarios are in no way comparable
[–]kellydayscruff -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes they are.
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope, the comparison is ridiculous
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I’m sorry but you’re fucking tripping if you think a tall good looking guy is gonna get laid daily off Tinder
He might have some success but unless you’re legit 1% or have a boat (1% wealth) you’re not fucking everyday
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
How would you know? Are you handsome and tall and a tinder user?
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Well 2/3 because I’m not 6’+. I do fairly well on Tinder but Its mainly just luck for me
I do know guys that check all 3 and it’s not nearly as easy to get women and matches as you’d expect esp if you’re not on a college campus
So since being good looking is subjective, you can probably safely assume that you arent getting laid on tinder because you or your friends arent as handsome as would be required to get laid on a daily basis on tinder. Doesnt mean that there are people who arent.
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
You clearly just didn’t read a word of what I said.
I would bet a large amount of money you know <2 men who could get laid everyday off Tinder. I would also bet a large amount of money that there’s plenty of fat chicks on Reddit who show their dating stats and could get railed daily
You yourself said the success you have had on tinder has been luck correct?
You said your friends are more attractive than you which I will take with a grain of salt because people of similar attractiveness usually hang out together but for sake of argument we will go along with what you believe about them.
The fact is that tinder is used for sex and people are looking for sex from the most attractive ppl available. Any large city should be able to accommodate several women weekly for a guy who is attractive enough. Whether it happens on a daily vs weekly basis is a matter of semantics. If it definitely is not then provide the stats to back it up.
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It doesn't matter that it's 'hard' to be a stud because women are more selective.
You're still a disgusting slut.
[+]angryearth😺multipass -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cope.
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Attention!
You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]januaryphilosopherWoman/student/UK/radfem/makes first move/healthy BMI/bi/taken 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Trying really hard to be a solution doesn't make it a good thing. In any other context, trying hard to do something bad makes it worse.
[–]chingness 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There are ugly man sluts too… I refer you to Jeremy Kyle Uk show it’s mental 😂😂
[–]thetruthishere_Resident MILF Whore 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Blame it on your fellow man, they are so thirsty they will stick their D in anything. Men make it easy just to be 'there'.
Go be a gay guy and you can easily be a stud and experience the male thirst.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]JosieSandiePurple Pill Woman 63 points64 points65 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 6 points7 points8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]EminemLovesGrapesSpongebob 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DifferenceEconomyAD -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KoipiscesNo Pill 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Willow-girlReusable Hag 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]kvakerokEvolved RP "Chadlite" 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ohms2North 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Impossible-Bank-1697 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ohms2North 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Impossible-Bank-1697 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RegularDue9718 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shazoa 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnykindoflandIt's your looks, really 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 15 points16 points17 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]RegularDue9718 2 points3 points4 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 16 points17 points18 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]RegularDue9718 -2 points-1 points0 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 4 points5 points6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Treacle-Flimsy 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Entertainer63121 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AcidSpittingIlamaa -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]justforlulz12345Jester Pill 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]howdoiw0rkthisthingsugar-pilled 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 8 points9 points10 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]TigerRude4 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 7 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]spicyelgato 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Otherwise_Zebra120 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DicamVeritatemRed Pill Man 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LupeDyCazari 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KommandaKoopa 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OnePotatoeChip 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ffandyy 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]xzpw30s/M/USA/HENRY/blackpill 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ffandyy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]spicyelgato 7 points8 points9 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]propagandudumb bitcharooni pizza 13 points14 points15 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]spicyelgato 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]propagandudumb bitcharooni pizza 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 6 points7 points8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DicamVeritatemRed Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 3 points4 points5 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 2 points3 points4 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dafiro93 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dafiro93 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WestCombSplit 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lulilooI believe in god and rp 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Urbanwitch666 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]WestCombSplit 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Urbanwitch666 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]WestCombSplit 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Urbanwitch666 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]WestCombSplit 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Urbanwitch666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_butter_lord 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cult_of_ChadSex Master 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigZaddyZ3 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigZaddyZ3 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigZaddyZ3 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigZaddyZ3 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigZaddyZ3 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jobbo321 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jobbo321 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 -1 points0 points1 point (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kimba93 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snivelingincel 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]kellydayscruff -8 points-7 points-6 points (59 children) | Copy Link
[–]gugabe 13 points14 points15 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff -4 points-3 points-2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]gugabe 5 points6 points7 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]gugabe 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dafiro93 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BridgeBurner22 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowcat1606 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]kellydayscruff -8 points-7 points-6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowcat1606 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 7 points8 points9 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]angryearth😺multipass -2 points-1 points0 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 9 points10 points11 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]angryearth😺multipass -2 points-1 points0 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]warramite 2 points3 points4 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]warramite 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pastakingfifth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]angryearth😺multipass 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KamuiObito 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rootsnyder 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 4 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rootsnyder 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]austin1011231 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ducks_Are_WatchingNo Pill, I'm on rehab 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]THHBHStT 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kellydayscruff 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]angryearth😺multipass -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]januaryphilosopherWoman/student/UK/radfem/makes first move/healthy BMI/bi/taken 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chingness 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thetruthishere_Resident MILF Whore 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link