And by the stats I'm talking about that male sexless number we see being used in discussions about young men.

The reason I bring this up is because I've been perusing review forums of escorts/massage parlors and have noticed that the overwhelming majority of "mongers" and "hobbyists" are well above 35, and mostly in their 40s. Many are married. I wouldn't be able to describe their sexual political views neatly using pillspeak but they are just your average gen x er who sees prostitutes, it's basically exactly as you'd picture.

Anyway, my being 21 seems to be unusual to many of the providers as well as the people on those forums, but the way I see it I've made a necessary choice in accordance with what the Holy internet has told me; same old dating for young men, 90/10 rule, stuff like that has basically molded my view of people to the point that I have absolutely no qualms anymore with paying for sex other than an aching desire that things were better. I know they don't fill the "loneliness" and affection thing but I'm convinced that it's not really something I or most men my age are capable of achieving.

I just find it odd that the men who are seeing these hookers think that young men are somehow way more capable of finding "free sex" when it's really way to hard especially for introverts/shy/AFC guys like me. It simply boils down to I want sex and getting it for free is WAY to daunting and not worth the effort, and I'm better off paying.