Women back in the days, couldn’t work. Many men would argue that they gave away a good thing. That they were foolish to give up a ‘fulfilled’ life of work for the family rather than corporations. I’d agrue this view is not only manipulative in its narrative, but its also indicative of the male lack of understanding of the similarities (and differences) of female sexuality.

Back in the days, a woman had no real choice when it came to supporting herself. She had to find a husband and she had to keep him happy, even at the expense of her own happiness. This was because if she didn’t why would he continue to provide for her when he could find someone who did. He had the privilege of being the bread winner and being able to afford to spend time looking for a wife. A woman couldn’t. This meant there was an imbalance in these relationships in favour of the males.

If a husband wanted sex from his wife, she better put out. Even though in most cases, the woman was married to a man she did not find attractive. No thought was even given to what women were sexually attracted to; their freedom to experience a connection with someone they were sexually attracted to with wasn’t there. They couldn’t afford to. Instead they were stuck with only being with a man they largely didn’t find attractive have children they may have never wanted.

Women, much like men desire to be with attractive partners. Although, these men may be harder for a woman to get due to few men in their eyes falling into that category. So largely, women would have to marry a man they don’t like. However, No woman wants to have sex with a man they don’t like just to survive. Men seem unable to to realise this. Perhaps because this was never their reality, or their higher sex drive means they are willing to have sex with just about anything. Women are different in this way. Women don’t want to have sex with just any man even if it for survival, they just do it because they have to. A mans dream is a woman’s nightmare.

When women in mass left the role of homemaker, she left having to be obedient to her husband out of survival. She gained the ability to exercise her sexuality. She left having to have children she didn’t ever want; By having a means to support herself regardless of her husbands happiness or even having a husband.

The leverage men once held over women to get what they wanted (or needed depending of the man and his views) was gone. Suddenly, men had to bring more to the table than simply being able to provide basic financial support. Men today are unhappy about this. They look back to the past not considering what it really was for the women then, with immense envy. It was a great deal for men. No one can deny that, but it wasn’t for women. All this narrative spinning men do trying to convince women that leaving their “partnership” was a mistake is either conscious or unconscious manipulation—intended to bring back the days of old. Where, men could have easy access to what they wanted (sex and children).

To these men I say, accept the truth. Those days are gone. A few men selfishly gave up the good life of their gender for pussy— they fucked over men. The thirst of the male gender was and is it’s undoing. Trying to convince women they made a mistake is a waste of time. They, even if they can’t vocalise the knowledge, know it was a bad deal for them.

“But what about modern tradcon women” Tradcon women today aren’t signing the same deal they got before. Because most women work, earning a sole, average income is no longer enough to support a family. Only rich men can. Tradcons are a clever way to seek out a rich man that they can marry, then use the threat of a divorce (and losing their stuff) to gain leverage. These women although they would prefer attractive men, women are willing to pretend to be interested in an unattractive man in order to not have to work for living. While at the same time being able to (once married) deny the rich guy what he wants. Basically beta bucks or whatever. Some women are willing, under these laws, to give up their sexuality (for a time) to secure easy resources.