~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
FreakyLatexMan
[–]O-shi 598 points599 points600 points 9 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link
Cosmopolitan is trash
[–]n_surf 310 points311 points312 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Every female-oriented web/zine I know has this double standard, honestly.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]badon_ 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is getting reposted in other subreddits. Check the "other discussions" tab at the top of this page.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]HPGMaphax 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
effing horrible
FTFY
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
effing horrible trash
[–]Griever114 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Confirmed: AWALT
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Every Female I know has this double standard.
[–]Griever114 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Every Female I know has uses this double standards.
[–]Zoenboen 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Slut shaming... I never hear men say this word, but women do.
[–]superhobo666 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
From my experience the only people who shame others for being slutty are women, I've never heard men care that much about a woman who likes lots of easy sex.
[–]LoicyT 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's because that isn't what a slut means to us.
It refers to women who fuck men we think are low class. Showing they have low standards.
Using it to refer to liking sex is a secondary definition. We usually use "nympho" or "freak" in an affectionate way to describe that.
[–]Griever114 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup
[–]KalebMW99 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You know a lot of the wrong women then. Yeah, Cosmo feeds a lot of women this double standard, as does a lot of media, but there are plenty of women out there reasonable enough to see past this bullshit.
[–]panther455 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Sure. I guess its hard to tell because you can hear someone say "all men are pigs" but most people who are reasonable dont go around saying things like "I think its okay to appreciate the attractiveness of both sexes" because there aren't many situations to say that.
Vocal minority maybe, but I really wish the majority would speak up when the minority starts tainting the majority.
A few bad apples. Of course its bad to generalize and lump everyone in one category... but you know... its hard... and its a personal thing because "hey wait a minute Im a guy!"
Do i just laugh at it? Brush it off? Or speak up and get bitched at? What do I even say? Is it even worth it? It still makes me feel bad...
Yknow? Consideration and all, it goes both ways.
[–]KalebMW99 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I gotchu. You seem reasonable, I rescind my previous downvote.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
indeed there are but most take the easy route and put the brain on cruise control and would never see the commonality.
[–]LedZeppelin1602 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Buzzfeed is the worst. They go on and on about sexism and objectification but have a weekly gallery of hot guys and run stories about dick size
[–]hashtagwindbag 31 points32 points33 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No kidding. It's "36 Summer Olympic bulges that deserve gold" followed by forty gold trophies.
Absolute garbage.
[–]jaheiner 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They'd throw a bitch fit and be writing about sexism in our world if there was an article in Maxim titled "42 Sets of Boobs at the Summer Olympics that deserve the gold!"
[–]billybobjoejr330 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
*all tabloid websites are trash.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
I just saw a TIL post saying Cosmopolitan had an article in 1998 saying a straight woman can't get HIV from missionary position with an HIV positive person and that it doesn't effect heterosexual couples.
Edit: 1988, not 1998
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Do you know who wrote it?
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In its January 1988 issue, Cosmopolitan ran a feature claiming that women had almost no reason to worry about contracting HIV long after the best available medical science indicated otherwise. The piece claimed that unprotected sex with an HIV-positive man did not put women at risk of infection and went on to state that "most heterosexuals are not at risk" and that it was impossible to transmit HIV in the missionary position.[35] This article angered many knowledgeable people, including AIDS and gay rights activists.[36][37] The protests organised in response to the article's publication were turned into a 30-minute documentary titled "Doctors, Liars and Women: AIDS Activists Say NO to Cosmo" by two members of ACTUP, a New York City based collective of HIV/AIDS activists.
This is all I could find- Wikipedia.)
The TIL post was also a link to this Wiki page, I couldn't find who wrote the article though.
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It is probably in the sources.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The TIL post or the Cosmo article?
Everything g.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
not only are they trash but they do the double standard thing on purpose to get clicks/attention
better to just ignore them and if you happen to be in a waiting/break room and find their magazine, see that it finds the trash can
[–]notacrackheadofficer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Better to write things in it with sharpie, and leave it where it will be read by those who need educating..
[–]Larry-Man 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Using cosmo here is like using the incels subreddit on niceguys.
Shooting fish in a barrel.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]repoman 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's because Fucking White Males have all the power and therefore cannot possibly be victims of objectification/rape/murder/etc. Only unempowered minority groups can be objectified/raped/murdered/etc.
This message brought to you by your friendly neighborhood liberal arts college. Enroll today and let us brainwash enlighten you!
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Racism and the patriarchy are institutionalized." This is my favorite excuse. Now you've set it up so it's not going anywhere simply so certain people can complain about it and use it for their benefit. Get a job and shut the hell up ffs.
Sarcastic statement that is true according to society.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (75 children) | Copy Link
[–]tharkyllinus 182 points183 points184 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Oh for the good old days.......Get off my grass you whipper snapper....oh excuse me where was I?
[–]MaturinsGirth 79 points80 points81 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Excuse me sir, you dropped your onion....which you carry on your belt, as it was the style at the time.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hah! Turlet!
No, I'm not superman haha I just own an RV.
[–]JakeDC 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gosh darn kids with their pet rocks and their soda fountains their hula hoops. Why, back in my day etc.
[–]jimbojonesFA 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
'Member?
[–]Triskerai 81 points82 points83 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Had to upvote this
Though it is pretty absurd to be attracted to most feminists
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I concur
[–]superhobo666 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can't tell if punk-rocker or batshit fucking stab-me-in-the-balls crazy
Until they turn around and you see the feminist permanent scowl or the feminist glasses.
[–]Phkn-Pharaoh 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
https://m.imgur.com/5Y9H0sj
[–]GuerrillaKing 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's like they meme'd themselves like they're self aware of their ridiculousness
[–]Phkn-Pharaoh 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sometimes they make it too easy lol
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Not at all. It's not just the physical aspect, it's pretty hard to be attracted to someone who calls you trash and disgusting and criticizes everything about you for your gender
[–]Triskerai 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
OK your username indicates you're a troll and your comments have no thought behind them so this is the last I'll respond to you.
Not a single one of us uses the hateful language many feminists use against all men against women. Nor do we argue that women as a gender are doing anything particularly wrong. We fight for inequalities in public perception and the justice system (quite frequently one and the same) to be rectified, and against attempts to be criminalized for being male. We point out hypocrisy, and though we do generalize feminists quite frequently it is much more fair to level general accusations at feminists who choose to be so than men who are born the way they are.
[–]mj2sexay 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't even bother. The poster hops from sub to sub with his main point being that white males are the scum of the earth. He's trash.
[–]supacrusha 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
ikr, back in the days when you wore a bikini specifically show off your body, and not because "Uhh, I dunno, you're just sexist for looking at me anyway."
Presumably a bikini let's you sweat better than a one piece.
[–]Drfilthymcnasty 31 points32 points33 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Right. Why does every thing have to be mutually exclusive nowendays. Why do men's rights and needs have to take a hit at the expense of women's or vice versa? I love strong women, I respect strong men. Let's grown together people and embrace the differences.
[–]DrDougExeter 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
it's called 'divide and conquer' and is a time honored tradition used to oppress the people and to keep them fighting one another instead of turning on the ones actually keeping them down.
If you can make people emotional their rationality goes quickly out the window.
[–]Taxtro1 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What days do you miss?!
What romantic past do you fawn over?
[–]viper12a1a 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Late 90's to around 2009-10.
Before identitarian social justice bullshit.
[–]Taxtro1 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You think that didn't exist in the 90ies?
[–]viper12a1a 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It faded back for a decade or so and it wasn't so oppressive.
[–]Sarin_G_Series 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It did, but it was viewed correctly by mainstream media and comedians then: childish, insulated, joke-fodder
[–]SunosUnix 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah. For me it was the late 90s to 2001.... Shit just started to go downhill after 9/11 and the war on privacy it started...
[–]Sarin_G_Series 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude, my great-grandpa, talked about hanging out on the street corner, as a teen, hoping to catch a glimpse of ankle as women stepped up onto the curb. Not relevant to your comment, but I felt like sharing.
[–]SushiGato 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Still happens, just IRL. When you stay online you see this stuff. Only ever see this stuff here anyways. It's just people who like to get angry at SJW bullshit.
[–]viper12a1a 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Read my other comment
[–]Spurnout 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sex is on the verge of being illegal.
[+]HillsmanMcHandtree -35 points-34 points-33 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Maybe it still is that way and your view is skewed because you subscribe to subs like this one?
[–]shawarma_law 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't worry about the rambling, using trolls as foils for productive discussion is the best.
[–]hashtagwindbag 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In fairness, this isn't a bad point. There are a lot of good, genuine, and open people out there, and they're not so difficult to find. It's easy to stick to one's little circle of the internet (regardless of your social or political leanings) and convince yourself that all X are like Y.
That such prudish guy-fearing behavior exists is ridiculous considering the blatant hypocrisy, but you're right - we shouldn't get so carried away sitting behind our keyboards that we fall into the trap of thinking danger lurks around every corner. That's the same kind of fear-based thinking that amuses or offends us when it comes from the other side.
You make good words. I like.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No, it's not. Women are allowed to oggle men nonstop and it's fine, but if a guy looks at breasts society deems it disgusting and objectifying
[–]HillsmanMcHandtree 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I stare at women all the time and have never one time had anyone react in the manner you're describing.
Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it never happens.
[–]HillsmanMcHandtree 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's true, but it hardly seems common enough to have a whole subreddit about it.
[–]Rogdozz 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Is that a real "maybe" and a genuine question or do you think it's definitely like that?
All three. It may be like that, it's a serious question, I think it is like that.
People tend to remember and focus on negative interactions more so than positive ones. The people at the edges ruin it for the majority of people who are in the middle, who are decent, reasonable, and fair people.
[+]DolphinsAreOk -21 points-20 points-19 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Which day was that exactly?
[–]ThatDamnedImp 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As recently as the early, 00s, this kind of sex-negativity would have been extremely uncommon on the left, outside of certain sectors of feminism.
[+]g_squidman -67 points-66 points-65 points 9 years ago* (25 children) | Copy Link
Huh? We live in the most sex-positive time since like ancient Greece
Edit: let me ask you this. What old days are you talking about? I'm not saying there aren't issues, but damn, why blame "current year" for it? It's the best it's ever been right now.
[–]ShankyTaco 129 points130 points131 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
As long as you aren't a straight male.
[–]what_american_dream 76 points77 points78 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Straight white male, you bigot.
[+][deleted] -44 points-43 points-42 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Only if you spend all your time on the internet. Stop trying to be a victim
[–]ShankyTaco 44 points45 points46 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Except this shit is coming in to the real world too.
[–]BeefsteakTomato 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Stats are proving you wrong. People are having less sex now than ever.
[–]BeefsteakTomato 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
More contraceptives for sure though since less pregnancies.
[+][deleted] -38 points-37 points-36 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Having less sex is not prudish
[–]ExpendableOne 61 points62 points63 points 9 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link
Dude, we have gender segregated gyms because women have lost their collective shits at the notion that men might even look in their direction. Men are labelled pigs, pervs or creeps for even looking at women, and can be accused of harassment or even sexual assault for even trying to approach women. Men who try to get women's attention on the street are labelled "cat-callers" and treated as the worse scum of the earth(it's totally fine when women do it though). Universities are championing "safe spaces" for women who feel threatened by basic male heterosexuality. Men who seek any type of solicitation from women are criminalized and slandered. Men who use sex toys are belittled and ridiculed. Men who are late virgins are berated, shamed and delegitimized, instead of encouraged or empowered. Men are labelled rapists when having consensual sex with women, because they had minor amounts of alcohol in their system or because they changed their minds after the fact. Men who express unrequited feelings for women are often slandered and vilified as being entitled, conniving or having "toxic masculinity", and often automatically assumed to be possessive, obsessed or dangerous despite all proof to the contrary because they are men. Men's fetishes are often viewed very negatively and treated with disgust. Men can't express any kind of appreciation for female sexual attributes without being labelled misogynists, objectifiers or oppressors of women. Terms like "the male gaze", are invented to further disenfranchise men and male heterosexuality. "Dick pics" are considered the most offensive, indecent, obscene and disgusting, if not criminal, thing a guy can send to a girl, but when women send nudes it's viewed as a gift, a pleasure or as a woman showing her devotion and vulnerability to a man(and if he disrespects that gift in any way, he's a horrible man).
There is nothing "sex-positive" about any of these things, and that's not even going into the fact that male sexuality is completely devalued compared to women's, or how we expect men to pay all these dues to even interact with women(taking the lead, being the instigator, paying in dating, one-sided relationships, etc), or all the practices that have come up over the centuries since Ancient Greece to desexualize men(like circumcision, which is still rampant in a lot of countries), or the complete lack of reproductive rights for men that are still considered the norm(with very few options pre and post sex being made available to men). We are sex-positive in a lot of ways(mostly for women) but society has also grown more hostile to male heterosexuality than it has probably ever been.
[–]Rogdozz 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Meanwhile attractive men can't look up in crowded places without seeing at least two women staring at them. I'm not saying men find it annoying, but if women stare at men they should be okay with men looking at them too
[–]Triskerai 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I'm an attractive guy and I get lots of stares, but I have like 10 subroutines I have to pull off just to check a pretty girl out lol
[–]Rogdozz 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What subroutines?
[–]Triskerai 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If you see one in whatever room you walk into/she walks into you can sometimes make eye contact and just smile, but that's if she notices you right away. If you're caught staring, instant no. If you see her out of the corner of your eye, slowly look her direction but past her. If you see her looking towards you or in your direction, slowly change your body language then you can go in for some more serious eye contact then checking her body out, in that order.
It sounds like a bunch of bull, I know, but it removes the feeling that a total stranger is just coming up out of nowhere, and that's pretty important, and also gives you a flirty vibe. You still gotta go up and talk to her though it's just good for getting some of the no's out of the way beforehand and gauging interest.
If you're not a attractive guy though I think your best bet is just ballsy walk up and say hi non threateningly, it's not that many guys are ugly they just don't get noticed as much so they have to go make things happen a bit more
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't have a routine, but I'm pretty young and wasn't nearly as attractive as I am now until a year ago so I could definitely see myself being like you in a few years
I have almost no experience with approaching girls, but I feel like most women who stare at me feel attracted to me but don't expect or want me to approach them. They are just way too old for me and they know it. The bad thing about it is that those 20 year olds who stare or smile at me are kinda raising my standards when it comes to girls, I'm just not interested in girls my age (14-15 y/o) anymore and I don't think I can approach adult women either, so I'm going to try my luck with a few 17-18 years olds in my school next week
[–]Triskerai 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Advice for (slightly) older women- the calmer and more mature you are the better.
I think the biggest difference between men and women is not that they're not both attracted to looks, it's that it lasts way less for women because everyone knows that stupid douchebag who is hot but pretty worthless.
And bro I know how you feel I had crippling acne that only cleared before my senior year in high school, but once it did I went a bit crazy. Still a geek at heart though
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol yeah I'm planning to go crazy this summer as well. I didn't look that great in the past 6 months (my face looks like shit when it's cold outside for some reason) and I really missed the attention I used to get from girls, but now I have a lot of girls staring at me again and I want to finally fuck a hot one lol. Next Wednesday all the 12th graders will be in our school for one last time and I'm planning to approach two of them. My classmates are going to lose their minds when I get the number of the unarguably hottest girl in our school lol
Btw, have you ever been rejected by a girl who stared at you? If yes, does it happen often? Because a few weeks ago I approached a girl who had been staring at me or smiling at me in a really confident way every time she saw me for two weeks or so. She just kinda ignored me and then told me to fuck off in a very calm way. I guess she is the reason why I'm not sure if getting stares or smiles from girls really means anything
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hi, this is kind of unrelated but do you get stared at by men and and middle aged women too? Because right now I do (by a lot of them) and I'm not sure if it's because of my good looks or if there's another reason why people stare at me, so yeah I'd like to know if other attractive guys experience the same
[–]Iamsuperimposed 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
gender segregated gyms
A lot of that is perpetuated by old people (men and women) scared that boys and girls will sex it up at school.
Adult gyms. Not school gyms. Though those will probably be segregated soon too.
[–]Gloriustodorius 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Nope not even close modern society is actually extremely prudish due to the prevalence of Abrahamic religions and morals.
Current day just so so happens be very sex positive in comparison to recent history.
Edit: spelling mistakes
[–]g_squidman 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Abraham is religion has been around since about, oh wait, right, ancient Greece. Like I said. We're starting to leave it behind.
[–]Gloriustodorius 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Being around and being dominant are two very different things. Plus even if it was dominant from the time of ancient Greece that would only mean it's been present for less one quarter of the history of civilisation.
[+][deleted] -13 points-12 points-11 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
deleted What is this?
[–]Triskerai 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Your definition of sex-positive seems to be focused on women. Yes, women have a very sex-positive society today, but men are being criminalized for even looking the wrong way at women.
[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]50PercentLies -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's more like women weren't allowed to ogle men, or it wasn't as accepted. Then everyone said "hey you know what it's no problem if you ogle men. you should, it's fun!" And for some reason some women found they just couldn't bring themselves to do it and now they are demanding that men can't ogle women.
It all makes sense, you see.
[–][deleted] 250 points251 points252 points 9 years ago (87 children) | Copy Link
The silliest thing is it's these "women's magazines" that have double-page spreads pointing out physical flaws in female celebrities with big red arrows and circles. Nobody does more to damage women's self-esteem than women's magazines. You ever see even the trashiest of men's mags bitching about someone having "cellulite" (a made up term by the beauty industry) or a muffin top?
[–]ChaosOpen 109 points110 points111 points 9 years ago (73 children) | Copy Link
To be honest, I don't think I've ever heard a man call a woman a slut, however, I have known of several women calling other women sluts. Feminist spend so much time talking about men body shaming women but in reality the most horrible people to women are other women. Ask any rational person who was the most mean during middle school, they will most likely say "other girls."
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 89 points90 points91 points 9 years ago (60 children) | Copy Link
Men don't slut shame. Men like sluts.. they give men sex for nothing. Women claim men slut shame them when they won't wife them up...
[–][deleted] 44 points45 points46 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I love sluts. Take good care of your sluts, the true ones are like unicorns.
[–]Sha_of_Depression 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I wish I could find a slut.
They aren't for keeping...
(not a long time but a good time)
I'd rather be married to a girl that loved sex than one that put up with it a couple times a month.
Todd Rundgren - Slut https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjkcmFlZUV4
[–]Mister_Squishy 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link
I too like sluts, but be real, I have definitely known a few guys who slut shame. "You don't want to bro, trust me, I heard she gets around".
[–]Macheako[🍰] 47 points48 points49 points 9 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link
How dafuq is that "shaming"? Where I come from its called "stating the facts" lol goddamn women are so fuckin fragile.
They can ACTUALLY be a whore....but they cant bear to be called what they are? Nu uh. I aint livin in "that world" lol If people want me to stop using my eyes they can pry em from me
[–]Mister_Squishy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
It's shaming because the implication is that you shouldn't want to pursue a romantic or sexual relationship with someone just because of the number of partners they've had in the past, the very same trait for which guys would celebrate and compliment each other. Maybe you wouldn't understand because no one thinks less of you or treats you differently because of sexual decisions you made in the past, but there's nothing wrong with having sex for pleasure and no one should be made to feel bad about that, and it's not a reason to "warn your bro" about someone. The way you use the word "whore" is extremely derogatory. Why is a girl a whore just because she sleeps with a lot of guys? Is a guy a whore for sleeping with a lot of girls? It's not the truth at all you're stating, it's pure sexist slander.
Maybe where you come from is a place that needs to change and think about how they value the women in their communities? Just stating the facts...
Edit: grammar and punctuation
[–]Macheako[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
It's shaming because......there are real world implications to our actions? It's shaming because.....oh no, waith, that's right, it's not shaming, it's shameful!!! That's right!
Maybe you wouldn't understand because no one thinks less of you or treats you differently because of sexual decisions you made in the past
Go fuck yourself you tiny little cunt. You don't know me, and you better not try and PRETEND like you fuckin do. Not a threat man, I'm just highlighting the simple fact that you're talking completely outta your fucking ass so I guess that kinda make you an ASS HOLE, no? Thanks.
and it's not a reason to "warn your bro" about someone
Yes it is. Again, refer back to the "Go fuck yourself" portion of my reponse. I'm not going to stop my behavior, not here at least. If sleeping around = higher chance of infection = higher chance of being a whore = higher chance of having 'whore babies' = higher chance the bitch can't commit = you're such a faggot you can't even talk about this shit.
Seriously man, the fuck is wrong with you? Guys out here are HURTING and you don't give a fuck. Well how about this. I don't give a fuck about you until you can find a fucking bread crumb in your heart to care bout "decent men in general".
NOBODY wants to fuck trash. And if I see "trash", I'm a let my boy know "ey yo, dat bitch is str8 trash". Don't like it? Then don't BE trash. Goddamn. This shit ain't complicated.
The way you use the word "whore" is extremely derogatory
good
Why is a girl a whore just because she sleeps with a lot of guys?
Here's what you said "Why is a girl a whore when she acts like a total whore????". Why are you doing this to me?
Is a guy a whore for sleeping with a lot of girls?
Yes......what aren't you getting about the LITERAL definition of WHORE? "Someone that sleeps around with multiple partners as opposed to trying to have a committed relationship, therefor spreading disease, famine, fatherless kiddies, single parent homes" Yea....it's not a great look, kid, dafuq you want from me?
It's not the truth at all you're stating, it's pure sexist slander.
Sure, why not. It's a free world. Believe whatever you want.
You haven't stated ONE fact yet. And after this statement, that running total is still: ZER0000000000000000000000 Facts Stated
don't forget complete and utter lack of anything REMOTELY based in reality. That shit can hold ya back too ;)
All in all kid, I'm gonna have to rate your comment as: Trolling to the next level
Congrats, you got me to waste my time answering a total troll comment. Ya got me kid. Ya got me.
[–]silentconstipation 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Forget to take your meds today?
[–]THA-HINRICH-MANEUVER 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I fuckin hate people like you
[+]Macheako[🍰] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yesss!!!! FEEED YOUR ANGER!!!!! GIVE IN TO DA DANK SIDE!!!!!!
[–]PacMoron 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Eww chill out
[+]Macheako[🍰] -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
bro, i'm cooler than a dog wearin sunglasses, put some ice in your own cup before you start drinkin ;)
[–]cellerywithhumus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
So there is nothing wrong with having sex with a lot of people as long as you don't get pregnant, don't get diseases and eventually fall in love with someone and settle down?
[–]Macheako[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Look, if we're being honest, this conversation is a bitch and a half to unpack everything. So I'll just give ya the short and sweet of how I personally understand it, and if you got any questions about it, just ask away and I'll do my best to try and answer it, but
It would seem to me that in the overall continuation of a society, composed of men and women, it is in the overall interests of all Men and Women, that is, it further strengthens the overall bond between the two sexes and helps promote the greatest degree of societal flourishing, when there is little to no promiscuous sex, or sex outside of a committed relationship between the two partners. It serves to very little benefit, if any, for the Men and Women of a society to partake in noncommittal relationships between each other, and ultimately works to erode the existing bonds when such behavior becomes the norm. For Men and Women to "work together" they absolutely must trust each other, and in order to trust one another, they have to be, in some sense, "committed" to one another, without this commitment, it is very unlikely that the two genders will every fully trust the hidden intentions of the other.
[–]jzerocoolj 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
without this commitment, it is very unlikely that the two genders will every fully trust the hidden intentions of the other.
No shit, you're going to be constantly worrying about your girl monkey branching you.
[–]cellerywithhumus -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Interesting point. However, this is a statement sounds like it's rooted in religion. I have heard similar arguments against gay sex. Look at today's societies that have the most sexually conservative behavior they are almost all Muslim. Sexual repression is damaging to society and those cultures that embrace sexuality are much better off. The "hidden intentions" is where you point to the problem but if sex wasn't viewed as this harmful dangerous event than people wouldn't feel the need to hide their intentions.
Being a slut is entirely relative and is viewed very differently depending on the culture. There are places where women are considered whites for not completely covering their body. Calling someone a slut is rude and immature. If a married couple is into some kinky shit and the husband likes watching his wife bang other dudes is she than a slut for doing it? This scenario has trust, commitment and honesty. Another scenario is a guy who bangs two girls at the same time. This will always be met with adoration. I have done it and all of my friends thought it was awesome. However, of a woman banged two dudes at the same time the reaction is very different.
Now it may be a turn off for you if a woman has had many partners but in no way does this mean she is a bad person who should be outcasted by society. That is silly. Having consensual sex as an adult is not harmful to society. In fact if you look to nature monogamy rarely evolves and in most cases evolves when the females are extremely territorial and distant from each other. This makes it difficult for the male to maintain two females leading to monogamy. Human monogamy is not the gold standard. Through out history it has been very normal for men to have multiple wives and concubines. This is a double standard for women and it's silly. I hate double standards and slut shaming. What do you think the whole fuckboy thing is, It's just slut shaming men. Quit giving people a hard time for having sex. If you want everyone to stay a virgin until marriage you can just give up on that dream.
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why is a girl a whore just because she sleeps with a lot of guys? Here's what you said "Why is a girl a whore when she acts like a total whore????". Why are you doing this to me
Here's what you said "Why is a girl a whore when she acts like a total whore????". Why are you doing this to me
Whoring is selling sex not having many sex partners.
I suppose we should have a term for the lateral though.
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I use whore and slut interchangeably and call chicks that sell pussy hookers or prostitutes, but whore is just as valid.
Hookers -N- Whores.
Oh yea, that totally works lol
Shaming you do to their face and it must be insulting.
If I s tell a friend "the lips in that glory hole are male" am I gay-shaming? Or just telling the facts to someone so they can make an informed choice?
Whores don't necessarily get around or behave slutty. They might well their body to 1 rich well groomed client for example.
That's a good point....I guess, wouldn't she just be a gold digger then though? I figure if she's only fuckin one dude I can at least show her SOME humility and just call her a gold diggin whore though. At least I'm taking the time to make the distinction for her lol
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]duhhhh 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right. The term slut isn't usually used. "Fuckboy", "manwhore", "player", "womanizer", etc, on the other hand...
[–]Nac82 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's pure bullshit. My brother is the biggest slut I know and he is constantly shamed for it.
[–]Macheako[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
SO WHATTTTTTT!!!!!!! lololol
Wtf is wrong man????? Like, it doesn't matter if Men do or don't get "shamed" for it, the ONLY fucking question is
Is this behavior desired from the Women in a society?
we're not talking about men right now, we don't HAVE to.
Our discussion is 100% pertaining to the topic of Female behavior. Why is how Men are or aren't seen in society relevant to THIS discussion about Women? Now, we can have a different discussion about "Why aren't men as slut-shamed as women?", fine, fair enough, but that conversation is not this conversation.
You know who does this kinda shit? Do you know? Cause I think you fuckin know. When you're trying to have a talk about this thing, but then, ALL they do is bring up that thing, even though the two are completely unrelated..........any ideas ringing?
Women & Pussies
Seeing as this IS /r/pussypassdenied....I think you know what I gotta do to your pussy pass bud. It's for your own good. I promise. But if you want to have another goddamn discussion that's fine. But please. With all due respect, don't get the two topics confused. These are different problems, with different answers. Men and Women are not the fucking same. And if you think they are, by all means, go fuck a dude, and tell me just how "the same" we fuckin aren't.
I ain't ya enemy man, but for some reason all you kids are so fucking frightened by the idea of masculinity and being a dude. It's FUN man! A SHIT load a fun lol. And yea, it can "hurt" people, but you know what? So can being a GIANT pussy too afraid to stand up for what you believe in. That shit gets people killed. You wanna pretend like being confident in being a man is a bad thing, fine, but all I ask is that you STOP pretending that being a fuckin scared little shit is then therefor a good thing. It's not. Men aren't supposed to be weak and scared, sorry, but call me when Hollywood starts making movies about how the hero is a giant sniveling little pussy too afraid to fight for what he loves.
There's a reason that sorta shit don't "connect" with people man.
[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Here's a sneak peek of /r/pussypassdenied using the top posts of all time!
#1: Too soon? | 808 comments #2: Guys who go to the gym are pussies | 2147 comments #3: Judge Judy Not Having It | 1558 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
Your point?
fuck..... lolol thank you for that. Man, that REALLY removes the punch from that fruit punch lol xD
Thanks, literally just turned 30 today lol
[–]Sha_of_Depression 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's more of an STD warning....
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's not slut shaming, that's protecting your bros from having their dicks fall off.
[–]Mr-Zero-Fucks 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LMAO That sounds like the cheesiest telenovela line ever
That isn't necessarily shaming her, just informing a potential dabbler that she isn't desirable.
[–]ChaosOpen -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Women will not sleep with a guy who has a new girl every other night if they are aware of it. No woman likes a pick-up artist.
However, in the relationship dance men and women have very different roles, men have to use every tool in their arsenal to try and impress a girl enough for her to consider him, and a girl is the final authority on "yay" or "nay." If a guy can't impress a girl, he is going home alone, and that is what happens 99% of the time. So, when a guy DOES manage to do something, it's something he has had to work for and accomplished. Meanwhile women are the gate keepers, her job at a bar is to sit there, enjoy her drink, and turn guys down over and over, she never has to approach a guy to try and impress him. A woman doesn't normally have to work for sex, so when she has sex it is less of an accomplishment, and when she has sex often, it is like the monopoly banker winning by giving himself a stack of 500 dollar bills.
[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
women won't sleep with a guy who has a new girl every other night
T.Virgin
....women do indeed sleep with guys who are with a new woman every night. Matter of fact, they'll line up and fight for their turn with him, even going so far as to willingly share him in hopes of locking him down. It's been shown in study after study that women are more attracted to men already with other women.
Hell, all you need to do is check out the genetic bottlenecks in history to understand the 80/20 rule is as old as our species. Women love being with the top men and will always be that way. Because they are wired to be that way. Because they are women, female, the weaker, child rearing half of a sexually dimorphic species.
[–]ChaosOpen 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I figure with as much hate as smoosh or whatever his name gets it would be a safe assumption. Seems like I stand corrected.
[–]KalebMW99 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This one's called "I fuck sluts"
Women don't like sluts because sluts make it harder for women to use sex as leverage or a bargaining chip if the guy she's trying to convince can just walk over to Tiffany's place with a pizza and booze/bone the night away.
I don't use the term slut to refer to women who give no strings sex. I like those.
Sluts are trashy. They have low values. They fuck douchebags, cheat, trade sex for drugs, fuck guys in front of their babies on dirty mattresses, etc.
Men don't slut shame.
That's just a fucking lie. I get that this is theredpill2.0, but seriously.
You are right to point out this embellishment. I think we do it less but we still do it.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can't have people undercutting the market and giving it away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcOKqXYusQw
[–]Triskerai 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, but young girls being mean to other girls is because of their internalized misogyny as a result of toxic masculinity!
/s
[–]NotAnAlcoholicJack 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Then you clearly don't get out enough. Guys call girls sluts all the damn time.
Not that it matters, girls call guys much worse shit, but let's not be ignorant.
How much is all?
[–]themolestedsliver 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, like i make it a point to only use slut against my male friends.
i never genuinely used slut against a women as an insult, but growing up with sisters and having friend's that were girls oh why is she wearing that top, little slutty
"Sluttish washing up" Bridget Jones Diary.
[–]bunker_man 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think there was some wide scale study somewhere that found out that slut shaming as people imagine it more or less doesn't actually exist (not counting from old people / uber conservative areas. The kind that is ostensibly common everywhere). What it really is is a disguised way for girls to call other girls trashy / low class / poor. It has very little to do with sex in and of itself.
I call women sluts on the internet. I am more polite IRL.
[–]woodsy7729 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
My ex had bulimia and it stemmed from other women's comments, not what men said to her.
[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which is why feminism is not and will never be the solution to women or societies problems. They are so concerned with who cannot be in the wrong that their attempts to address the elephant in the room only makes things worse. And when people point out their problems they point to moderate feminist to excuse the radical feminist actually deciding and pushing the agenda.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're equating all women as being femenist, when that is totally not the case.
I've seen every form of abuse from all genders and sexualities. Men were always the meanest to me in high school.
Some have had mostly negative experiences with women and some mostly negative experiences with men.
I try to see all perspectives. That being said, the "men and women don't understand each other" trope is so old. I used to get mad that I have to be straight (turns out I'm not) because men and women live in completely separate worlds. And you know what, since being gay, none of that shit matters to me anymore. This struggle between men and women is largely due to the fact that you have to date each other, while simultaneously having very little clue how the other thinks. It's complicated even further when combined with the fact that even among men and women there is a large variation in psychological traits.
Fact is, most people think so differently and individualistically that generalizations are becoming harder and harder to make. It's easy to generalize about women, but can men generalize themselves without disagreement? Of course not, unless this subreddit only contains a subset of the male population that all think alike.
Women aren't going to change for men and men aren't going to change for women. Best you can do is sift through the large population and look for someone who shares similar perspectives.
Straight people really take it for granted the large dating pool they have. Like they should just be able to go to a bar and get laid easily. Our society is just too individualistic and disconnected by technology for that to be a reality. It takes time finding someone worth your while.
You seem to have completely misread my comment and took it as an invitation for you to have a pity party. Judging by the problems you bring up I can only say that you live a charmed life and seem to be either unthankful or unaware of how good you actually have it.
[–]II_Keyez_II 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Kinda off topic but how do you know cellulite is a made up thing? I've heard it a lot but only recently
[–]Murgie 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No it's not. Come on, three seconds of research is all it takes to know for sure.
Isn't it just fat dimpling or something?
My problem isn't the phenomenon so much as his we talk about it like some discrete thing.
[–]Deep_Fried_Twinkies 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Where there does it say it's not a real thing? Sure it's a "made up term" but so is literally everything else.
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Where there does it say it's not a real thing?
It doesn't. It says that it is a real thing.
Feminists go around saying that men control women's bodies and clothes too much.
Women do it to other women.
For all this talk about feminism and equality, they sure seem to acquiesce to a lot of behaviors that emphasizes looks over content of character.
[–]Murgie 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If I didn't know any better, I might even begin to suspect that it's a profit-driven corporation rather than an ideologically oriented activist organization. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But hey, whatever feeds the victimhood circlejerk. We like those, right?
[–]bwohlgemuth 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And the layouts are consistently on how to be prettier/thinner/sexier/easier than all the other girls.
I don't get it.
And I especially don't get the lack of pockets in their clothes either.
[–]Gorkildeathgod 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Do men even have trashy magazines? Never heard of one unless by trashy you mean GQ or something?
In Britain at least there's stuff like Nuts mag which is basically pub conversation distilled into a magazine. No celebrity gossip "my husband had sex with our cat" kind of stuff though.
[–]Gorkildeathgod 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ya, seems like women's magazines are much more trashy than men's
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The "unrealistic female body image" comes from women. Men usually don't care if you have a little belly fat or if you're too small or too tall.
[–]Proteus_Marius 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes, Cosmo is a "effing horrible" little rag. It has been this way for decades now.
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Am I crazy, or do I see this picture at least once a month reposted?
[–]TheBadger40 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Only once a month?
[–]Pandamonius84 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
not sure if statement about frequency this article is posted or period joke
[–]CAMYtheCOCONUT 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't except consistency from a fucking clickbait tabloid
Can we all just start linking every cosmo page to these, or at least plaster it on most of them?
And again the shittiest posts get upvoted the most, and the mods do nothing.
Have you ever wondered why the best quality posts here often get just a few hundred upvotes, yet shitposts get 5000+?
This sub is obviously being brigaded, and the fucking mods let it happen. They are probably part of a conspiracy with the admins to turn this sub into shit, and when you look at the stuff they do ban, it easy to see why.
[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link
Cosmopolitan Magazine had a different Editor in 2014 than it had in 2016. It was in the 2012-2016 time that Cosmo had a noticeably strong political period.
The articles were also probably written by entirely different people.
[–]ShankyTaco 53 points54 points55 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
And published by the same site. Every story they publish has the name "Cosmopolitan" on it, so if they want to have any respect as a news outlet, they should believe in every story they publish.
[–]Murgie 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
if they want to have any respect as a news outlet, they should believe in every story they publish.
Far be it from me to argue in defence of Cosmopolitan of all things, but I'm pretty sure that's not how it works. Particularly in regards to opinion pieces.
I mean, Cosmopolitan will print whatever the fuck they believe will earn them the most money, that goes without saying. But there's no shortage of genuine news sources unrelated to them which will gladly publish multiple opinion pieces simultaneously which are in direct ideological opposition to one another. That's just how real news agencies work.
Frankly, if every single piece of media coming out of a given organization maintains tight ideological consistence with everything else they've ever published, then you're not looking at a news source to begin with. You're looking at a "propaganda" mill. A source driven by ideology over the simple reporting of accurate information.
[–]chykin 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
As much as I agree with you, there are countless Daily Mail articles on this sub which is just as bad
What we should do is list the authors and dates and see who was the editor who approved each story.
[+][deleted] -17 points-16 points-15 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
... .........dude.
Cosmo is a lifestyle magazine for women. They're not news. They're not expected or required to publish anything factual or fair. This is the same magazine that publishes eight-question quizzes that can tell you what unattainable movie star is your most perfect match.
[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points 9 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Why do you assume I'm okay with demonizing men's attractions? The reason I didn't care about Playboy was because Playboy is a fucking dinosaur. Had they done it to a magazine I like, I might have cared. You could do it to Cosmo too, and I wouldn't really give any kinda shit. But would you be doing it out of fairness? Or you wanna cheese the feminists back? What's the saying; "An eye for an eye makes the world blind"?
But, note how they took your precious Playboy nudies, but left you the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition, Hustler magazine, internet Porn, your imagination, or pursuing actual sex with a person among the alternatives.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh right on the attack, good old Liv - can't make an argument without getting nasty. Why can't you hold a conversation without trying to denigrate your interlocutor?
Where did I attack you? I'm looking at the post, and I didn't even call you out on anything.
My point was clearly the hypocrisy. You obviously are ok with their hypocrisy since you just defended it
I didn't defend Cosmopolitan Magazine. I pointed out, in fairness, which I seem to be the only person here interested in, fairness, that the two articles were published by two different writers, two years apart, during the tenure of two different editors-in-chief. And it probably has something to do with the fact that 3 in 4 women are not career feminists and want to see hot guys in tight speedos (the same 3 in 4 women that don't begrudge men for having healthy sex fantasies).
But it seems like you just want everyone to be miserable. And given how quick you are to want to start a fight, I think I'll just leave you to your "being miserable". Don't worry about posting a reply; I won't read it.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HPGMaphax 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But you can't objectify women if everyone is blind!
[–]Triskerai 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I, objectively, have regular sex on a weekly basis.
I enjoy Playboy and SI swimsuit immensely.
Many women have sex with their boyfriends or just randoms weekly or daily.
They enjoy Cosmo.
Playboy gets shamed into the ground and the others are soon to follow. Because logic <>liberalism.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
...Cosmopolitan never had porn in it. Women's lifestyle magazines has celebrity gossip, health and beauty tips, interviews, fashion, trending entertainment, and of course, The Cosmo Quiz.
You're comparing apples to melons here :/ Unless you think people fap to the Healthy Living section...?
[–]Triskerai 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Who doesn't get off on "16 new ways to starve yourself?" Lol
Playboy has had articles in it for a long time. And the lines between such softcore porn as you would find in those magazines and underwear/swimsuit modeling are very blurred.
I've seen Playboy, in its pre-feminism days, when models posed naked. It may have been tasteful, but not all porn is raunchy.
Cosmo, on the other hand, has featured a total of 5 nude centerfolds in its 52 years as a women's magazine (and certainly in its 131 years in operation as a publication). With genitalia not on display, these five men, including Burt Reynolds and Arnold Schwarzennegger, were featured between 1972 and 1990, in each their own individual issue.
Then let me echo George Washington;
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetuated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism.
[+][deleted] -11 points-10 points-9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why? they serve as an avenue for certain people to state their opinions and some of those people disagree with each other
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Consistency is hard when you have no core belief system and are just whoring for clicks
Finally! Someone sees what I'm getting at. Magazines are corporate money sinks. The editors don't actually care what's in them, as long as they sell copies. The feministy stuff was probably not selling or grabbing ad revenue like it did in 2014.
In order to be a hypocrite, you have to do a reversal on your beliefs. To do that, you have to believe in something.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Getting mad that I'm correct isn't really going to help.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I presume you are then blaming President Trump for everything President Obama did. Since it doesn't matter if an organization changes hands. You evidently want to treat fluid institutions and organizations as though they are individual people with indeterminate lifespans. Cosmo is not a person born in 1886 making decisions with a single mind. It's a magazine whose editors come and go, whose contributors come and go.
I was using it as an example of how an organization can change leadership and policy without being hypocritical.
Do you also think about him while some dude is using as a cum dumpster?
The saddest part of this insult is that you didn't even get it right. I'm presuming that you meant to ask if I thought about Trump even while I was being used as a cum dumpster.
The answer to that question is no; I'm usually a little too busy to think about Trump during bukkake sessions.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
How are you defining "cuntsplaining" here? I only ask because it's not actually a real word.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So which one was this? Condescending? Overconfident? Inaccurate? Or oversimplified?
And by the way, when you mimic feminists, you make yourself look twice as foolish as they were. "Mansplaining" was a stain on the English language, and your answer to it is to come up with an even stupider "word" to abuse. Quite sad. MRM has now become Meninism.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Okay, so the first one is subjective. You perceive condescension. That's fine; I won't tell you how to perceive, but I have no condescension - or at least, I had none until you started being pissy babies about me typing words at you.
As for inaccurate, you're going to have to back that shit up with a little evidence of your own.
[–]mac148 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
How many times are people going to repost this same image? I must have seen it at least 5 times in the past year on this sub.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Queen_Jezza 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Just because you appreciate it doesn't mean it doesn't contain nuclear launch codes...
[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I figured we could keep that going...
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mathwave 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
The fact that it "Ruins subs/reddit as a whole" doesn't mean anyone here really cares besides you
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mathwave 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Again, who cares?
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mathwave 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Haha okay mister ambassador. What are you going to do to better this site realistically? Anything at all? Edit besides complain of course.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same. It's one of the top posts so you would expect people to check those out before delving into the nitty gritty of the sub.
[–]CrackaDon_YT 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
To be fair, those bulges do deserve gold.
Reeeeeeepost x15
[–]OliverBludsport 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
While this kind of marketing certainly indicates that there is a demographic this double standard can appeal to it also fits into the, "playing both sides of Anger Marketing" model which we're all very familiar with now.
I'm not disputing the hypocrisy. That's clear but it is no small component of the problem that business's using this model are lucrative because they capture the attention of their audience and keep it by inciting that audience which in turn stays that much longer commenting/ sharing/ etc all the while promoting their content. Even sharing it here is a plug for Cosmopolitan. It's an abusive practice and I'm not really sure how we can reign in these larger social problems before we reign in a pervasive business model that profits by perpetuating them.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Who reads that shit anyway? Females with IQs below 70?
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I sometimes read the cosmopolitan Snapchat story because it's the most batshit insane shit and it can be a good laugh and rage boner
Yeah, I see some on my Snapchat as well and it does make for a good laugh every now and then.
Indeed, feminists
[–]301niko 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There's one orangutan specie that has an IQ of 70, amazing right?
[–]LoicyT 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Dale Evans McGillicutty
Haha!
[–]TheBadger40 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Relevant
[–]Reverie_Smasher 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
can one admire someone physically without objectifying them?
[–]by_myself 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes.
The argument for objectification is that if you admire someone for their physical appearance you're reducing your perception of them down to what you can see externally only: you don't care about their feelings, that they have thoughts, that sort of thing. You see them the same way you might see a flower, a book, a car, or a piece of jewellery.
It's my opinion that anyone who throws around accusations of objectification does not have empathy. It's no different than making the off-colour joke that men only have enough blood for either their brain or their penis.
[–]notabotisbotanot 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OBJECTION
[–]walterwhiteknight 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I wonder if it's different authors though.
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same editor? Same magazine.
[–]Ilikewaterandjuice 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude, how much time do you spend on the Cosmo web site?
[–]Karldatrombone 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Preach
[–]despairguardian 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can we stop reposting this one guys/ladies?
[–]chambertlo 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Isn't cosmopolitan the "publication" that printed that straight women had nothing to worry about during the great AIDS scare?
[–]78MechanicalFlower 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've never seen anything like this in a girly mag. But anyways, as a chick who loves dick pics, there is no way I'm cool with this. Surely this is made up.
[–]spacedogg 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I personally think we shouldn't make a stink about this.
It would serve the fems in their argument that we are snowflakes
[–]bananastanding 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It bothers me that there's more than 36 trophies in that tweet.
[–]emberfly 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How many times is this going to be posted here? Do we have to see this every week?
[–]TheLonelyPotato666 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How many times will this be posted before people stop upvoting it? We've seen it already
[+]Imnotmrabut -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]skinnyguy699 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Trash comment, bot should be deleted.
[+]Imnotmrabut -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Darling - do get up to speed with how Basic Human Behaviours lead to Biases and Double Standards.
Hypergamy is the foundation of Cosmo's Idiocy and Blind Bias.
[–]skinnyguy699 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
You're comment insinuated that all women perpetuate this stereotype rather than Cosmo specifically. I don't read Cosmo so I'll have to take your word on it.
[–]serenwipiti 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut -14 points-13 points-12 points 9 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link
No Darling - I Insinuated Nothing.
Please Keep your Innate and Internal Biases under control - Project Less and stop acting like an IMAX. P¬))
[–]skinnyguy699 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Please make reasoned arguments so your meaning is clear rather than vague condescending assertions.
[+]Imnotmrabut -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Darling - learn the art of asking QUESTIONS and Project (Far, Far) Less. P¬))
It tends to promote dialogue and exploration and not your biases. P¬))
[–]skinnyguy699 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Being condescending and calling a male internet stranger darling certainly doesn't promote dialogue. This is my last response.
[–]DataBound 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah. The broad-casting is real with that one
[–]Imnotmrabut -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Fine with me Darling - but if you are unable to cope with an Out Queer War Horse and some "Wimsey", you may need to gather some maturity, even a sense of humour and be a Far Less Homophobic Dick. P¬))
TTFN Darling! TTFN!
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Thanks for the Friday Lulz!
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Hey everyone, look at me! Look at how retarded I am, pretending I don't know how basic communication works! Give me attention! Give me attention!
[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If you need attention for your communication needs check out /r/NarcissismIsMyFlair P¬))
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I like the way you validated my point by pretending quoted text is too difficult a concept for you to comprehend.
[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
But Darling - if you were not quoting yourself, who were you quoting in abstraction like a Feminut? P¬))
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You.
Again, thank you for further validating my point by continuing your display of feigned ignorance.
It really does say a lot about a person when they demonstrate the belief that pretend stupidity is the most effective way to make their point.
[+][deleted] -11 points-10 points-9 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
So are you guys fighting for the 'right' to be as childishly whiny as the feminist side?
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
I think it's more a "why are you, your followers, and a surprisingly high number of people convinced that men, manhood, and masculinity are wrong and hold us (men) to a higher standard, and then turn right around and perform the behavior you criticized us for?"
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Ok. You think whining about it on Reddit might help?
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
No constantly whining about insignificant shit = cancerous.
These are the 'men' of our time.
Yes, you're all whiny pussies.
[–]tmone 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Lol. You're trying too,hard, man. You're being too obvious.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Obvious about what. I know you'll say something gay like I'm 'trolling' or something, but I'm dead serious. You kids are all legit pussies to pretty much everyone over like 35.
What kind of man spends his time whining on the internet about a perceived slight from some blog or something? Just because it's the accepted norm among your circle doesn't mean it's cool or legitimate in any way.
Edit: now point out that I'm whining about your whining and be done with thinking about it any further, you fucking idiot.
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
So, you basically think that 90% of what today's feminists do is cancerous. Got it.
[–]The_BenL 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What? I think you replied to the wrong person. I implied that 90% of what feminists today do is whine about insignificant shit. Not sure what the hell you're on about.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Yep, pretty much.
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Cool, me too.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I think a large portion of society would agree. Probably the majority.
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I sure hope so. I think you're probably right though
[–]tmone 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think a large portion of people in your life probably think you're a douchbag.
[–]CptMisery 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It might. Better chance than doing nothing
It's called hypocrisy. Keep up.
[+]alligatorterror -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well Cosmo is geared to girls/women... I can see why
What are you on about?
[+]melvocado -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh no. Evening out the playing field.
[–]Getoutabed -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How is Cosmo trash even worth this sub?
Because it's perpetuating a double standard. And double standards are offensive.
[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]N4T3R 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
.....no
[–]N4T3R 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh wait....let me respond in exactly how you were hoping someone would:
Me: "How is hypocrisy a meaningless word?" Muellacct: A bunch of philosophical bullshit in an attempt to sound smart
Instead, just no.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]O-shi 598 points599 points600 points (31 children) | Copy Link
[–]n_surf 310 points311 points312 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]badon_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]HPGMaphax 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Griever114 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Griever114 18 points19 points20 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zoenboen 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]superhobo666 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Griever114 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KalebMW99 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]panther455 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KalebMW99 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LedZeppelin1602 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hashtagwindbag 31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jaheiner 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]billybobjoejr330 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]notacrackheadofficer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Larry-Man 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]repoman 28 points29 points30 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (75 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]tharkyllinus 182 points183 points184 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]MaturinsGirth 79 points80 points81 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JakeDC 28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jimbojonesFA 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 81 points82 points83 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]superhobo666 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Phkn-Pharaoh 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GuerrillaKing 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Phkn-Pharaoh 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Triskerai 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Triskerai 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mj2sexay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]supacrusha 13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drfilthymcnasty 31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DrDougExeter 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Taxtro1 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]viper12a1a 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Taxtro1 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]viper12a1a 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sarin_G_Series 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SunosUnix 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sarin_G_Series 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SushiGato 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]viper12a1a 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spurnout 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]HillsmanMcHandtree -35 points-34 points-33 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]shawarma_law 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hashtagwindbag 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]HillsmanMcHandtree 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HillsmanMcHandtree 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HillsmanMcHandtree 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]DolphinsAreOk -21 points-20 points-19 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]ThatDamnedImp 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]g_squidman -67 points-66 points-65 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShankyTaco 129 points130 points131 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]what_american_dream 76 points77 points78 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -44 points-43 points-42 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShankyTaco 44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BeefsteakTomato 36 points37 points38 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]BeefsteakTomato 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -38 points-37 points-36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ExpendableOne 61 points62 points63 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 16 points17 points18 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rogdozz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iamsuperimposed 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]viper12a1a 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gloriustodorius 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]g_squidman 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Gloriustodorius 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -13 points-12 points-11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]50PercentLies -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 250 points251 points252 points (87 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen 109 points110 points111 points (73 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 89 points90 points91 points (60 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 44 points45 points46 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sha_of_Depression 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]notacrackheadofficer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mister_Squishy 18 points19 points20 points (49 children) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 47 points48 points49 points (40 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mister_Squishy 3 points4 points5 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]silentconstipation 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]THA-HINRICH-MANEUVER 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]Macheako[🍰] -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PacMoron 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]Macheako[🍰] -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cellerywithhumus 1 point2 points3 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]jzerocoolj 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cellerywithhumus -1 points0 points1 point (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]duhhhh 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nac82 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Macheako[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sha_of_Depression 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr-Zero-Fucks 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KalebMW99 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotAnAlcoholicJack 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]themolestedsliver 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bunker_man 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]woodsy7729 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]II_Keyez_II 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Deep_Fried_Twinkies 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bwohlgemuth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gorkildeathgod 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Gorkildeathgod 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Proteus_Marius 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheBadger40 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pandamonius84 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CAMYtheCOCONUT 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points (34 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShankyTaco 53 points54 points55 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chykin 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -17 points-16 points-15 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HPGMaphax 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Triskerai 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -11 points-10 points-9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (11 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (10 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]mac148 19 points20 points21 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (18 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Queen_Jezza 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (16 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[+][deleted] (15 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (11 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Mathwave 2 points3 points4 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Mathwave 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Mathwave 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CrackaDon_YT 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OliverBludsport 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]301niko 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoicyT 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheBadger40 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reverie_Smasher 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]by_myself 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]notabotisbotanot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]walterwhiteknight 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ilikewaterandjuice 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Karldatrombone 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]despairguardian 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chambertlo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]78MechanicalFlower 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]spacedogg 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bananastanding 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]emberfly 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLonelyPotato666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut -10 points-9 points-8 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]skinnyguy699 1 point2 points3 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut -10 points-9 points-8 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]skinnyguy699 -1 points0 points1 point (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]serenwipiti 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut -14 points-13 points-12 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]skinnyguy699 4 points5 points6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut -8 points-7 points-6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]skinnyguy699 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DataBound 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_MRAnarchist -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Murgie 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -11 points-10 points-9 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (20 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]The_BenL 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_BenL 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CptMisery 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chambertlo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]alligatorterror -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]chambertlo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]melvocado -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Getoutabed -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]N4T3R 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]N4T3R 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link