Circumcision does extreme damage to the penis and to sexual functioning. The foreskin has 20,000 specialized nerve endings of sexual tissue compared to the clitoris, which has 8,000.

Obviously, losing this tissue causes an immediate and drastic loss in sexual sensation.

It also destroys the natural lubrication abilities- uncircumcised men never need lubrication for the penis, FYI.

In addition, the penis glands become numbed when they load the protection and moisture foreskin provides.

A circumcised man has about 10% the sexual sensation of an uncircumcised man. Multiply what you feel by 10- that's what uncircumcised men feel.

Feminists support male circumcision , and are against any efforts to ban infant circumcision. NOW protested the measure proposed in San Francisco to make circumcision illegal to perform on a child under 18.

What happened to " my body , my choice?"

Feminists come up with all sorts of reasons why circumcision isn't a bad thing and why it shouldn't be the mans choice.

No, it's just like.... Circumcision should be a decision for adults, because it's permanent and babies can't choose.

The feminist argument against banning infant circumcision is literally this: " female circumcision is so much worse, that they should even be talking about circumcision.

This is like saying its ok to cut off a finger, because cutting off a hand is worse. Yep, feminist logic.

To me, this shows extreme and disgusting sexism towards the male gender.

Cutting ANY other body part would be considered mutilation. Cutting off the earlobe or fingertip would be mutilation, but NOT the foreskin, JUST because it's worse when it happens to girls.