This is true. The statistics don’t account for the cause, from the data I believe it’s likely that men get in trouble more often, so I wish they would have taken a little more data and proved that.
Maybe. But this data really doesn't show at all that men are penalised more heavily than women.
For one, it just shows that men are penalised more often. But if men are offending at 3x the rate of women then this would be expected. And that isn't unfathomable, especially given that men play significantly longer games.
But also, and quite importantly, this data actually shows that women are penalised for coaching violations twice as often as men are. And coaching violations are what Serena was called on.
At best this data is inconclusive. At worst it actually supports Serena.
If you read the article they say that even taking into account the fact that men play longer than women and that men are in greater number than women in tennis, men are still fined at a greater rate.
You are the one using the time played as reason for men being more offender than women, I just tell you that the article say this has been taken into account.
I mention it because it reduces the implication of the numbers. The fact that it doesn't completely negate the implication of the numbers doesn't affect my point at all.
The fact that Serena was indeed violating the rules is also irrelevant to this point. The complaint is that women get punished at a higher rate than men for the same infraction.
Serena was called on coaching, which her coach admitted doing, it was her first offense and she got a warning for that. She then throw a tantrum, broke her raquette (second offense) and called the referee a "liar" and a "thief" (third offense). Only the third offense had the consequence of docking her a point. She then said if was sexism, she is guilty of all these offense, the rules are the rules and it is really relevant because in the case her justification is bullshit.
But the claim is that women are punished in situations when men wouldn't be. For that claim it is in fact necessary that she was breaking the rules, so you parroting that she was breaking rules is inconsequential.
She was saying that men would not have been punished for those infractions.
That is what this article is about.
Not her claim that she didn't break the rules.
But her claim that she was being punished in a situation where a man would not be.
Well apparently the WTA do not consider coaching to be against the rules, whereas the ATP, who govern the major grand slams, do. So if you want an explanation of why coaching is the only rule women are penalised more on you can claim that they dont actually know the rules.
That's the important thing. The coach admitted the violation, and Williams put on a drama that went like "I'd rather lose than cheat, I haven't cheated", and then people cheered. Talking about alternative thruths.
I did read the article. I don't care if NY Times generally has a different opinion. That is not relevant. We are discussing this individual article.
The article gives total fines. It does not comment on what constitutes a penalty for men versus what constitutes a penalty for women.
My statement is anecdotal based on watching a lot of tennis. In my opinion male players are allowed to rant for a solid minute or two before being given a game penalty. In my opinion women are held to a different standard. Many professional tennis players, both male and female, have agreed with that. Do you disagree with that assessment?
Entirely untrue and quite the opposite. Men have outbursts way more frequently than women. Men are given more leniency during their outbursts. That is my opinion based on watching a lot of tennis. Do you disagree?
I put this data to a feminist friend recently, but she argued that “men commit more violations than women in tennis, so it’s not surprising they’re penalised more”. Going on to say loads of men behave like Serena did, but get away with it.
Such an annoying and subjective argument, any ideas of how to counter it?
The data does not prove it the other way. It proves that in total men have been fined more. Does it say if men have outbursts more? Does it say if when men have outbursts they are given the same leniency as women?
I watch a good amount of tennis. Anecdotally I will say that men have outbursts way more often than women. Also, IMO women are given a much shorter leash than men (e.g. a man can rant for a solid minute or two before being issued a game penalty while a women says only a few words before getting the same result).
I realize that. I have no problem with Serena being given a penalty in this situation (although a male tennis player has cursed at Ramos before (another clear violation) and not gotten penalized. Different situation and way less severe of an outburst so I am also okay with no penalty there). I am talking about tennis in general. In my opinion men tend to get away with more than women. Women are held to a different standard. Multiple tennis pros, both male and female, have said the same thing.
Do you think the disparity in sentencing is sexism?
No.
it would be a curious reversal of how men and women are treated by, say, the criminal justice system, where it is proven that men receive harsher sentences.
Serena Williams: It was an unfair double standard to take a game from me as a penalty during the match.
Morons: Her claim that she was fined more than men is totally bullshit!
There is no way she was complaining about the fine during the match because she wasn't fucking fined during the match, she was complaining about the penalty of losing a game for fuck's sake why can't we argue about whether her actual claim was valid rather than making up a bullshit argument that she never made.
Nope, because the complaint was specifically about being penalized a game, note about being fined. Why would she give a fuck about a few thousand in fines when she makes millions.
It's right in the quote that you posted. She had a game taken away from her as a penalty. She wasn't alleging that men or women get more fines or more penalties. She was only making one allegation; that men don't get games taken away from them for doing the same thing she did.
Maybe she's wrong maybe she's right, but why all the bullshit about her actual claim?
[–][deleted] 389 points390 points391 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdHomimeme 63 points64 points65 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 97 points98 points99 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dancing_Anatolia 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]--Edog-- 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]feared_rear_admiral1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
A week later when no one cares anymore? How nice.
[–]Fermit 63 points64 points65 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
The article was published 5 days ago, when there was still plenty of attention around the story.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Best_01 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -11 points-10 points-9 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mode1961 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]QuasisLogic1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
This is true. The statistics don’t account for the cause, from the data I believe it’s likely that men get in trouble more often, so I wish they would have taken a little more data and proved that.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thrway_1000 335 points336 points337 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShutupPussy 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (21 children) | Copy Link
Maybe. But this data really doesn't show at all that men are penalised more heavily than women.
For one, it just shows that men are penalised more often. But if men are offending at 3x the rate of women then this would be expected. And that isn't unfathomable, especially given that men play significantly longer games.
But also, and quite importantly, this data actually shows that women are penalised for coaching violations twice as often as men are. And coaching violations are what Serena was called on.
At best this data is inconclusive. At worst it actually supports Serena.
[+]shellbross1 points [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link
If you read the article they say that even taking into account the fact that men play longer than women and that men are in greater number than women in tennis, men are still fined at a greater rate.
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
A greater rate against time played, but there's nothing to suggest that they are fined at a greater rate per infraction.
[+]shellbross1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
You are the one using the time played as reason for men being more offender than women, I just tell you that the article say this has been taken into account.
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
I mention it because it reduces the implication of the numbers. The fact that it doesn't completely negate the implication of the numbers doesn't affect my point at all.
[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarkLorde117 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
In response to your ninja edit:
The fact that Serena was indeed violating the rules is also irrelevant to this point. The complaint is that women get punished at a higher rate than men for the same infraction.
[+]shellbross1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
Serena was called on coaching, which her coach admitted doing, it was her first offense and she got a warning for that. She then throw a tantrum, broke her raquette (second offense) and called the referee a "liar" and a "thief" (third offense). Only the third offense had the consequence of docking her a point. She then said if was sexism, she is guilty of all these offense, the rules are the rules and it is really relevant because in the case her justification is bullshit.
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
But the claim is that women are punished in situations when men wouldn't be. For that claim it is in fact necessary that she was breaking the rules, so you parroting that she was breaking rules is inconsequential.
She was saying that men would not have been punished for those infractions.
That is what this article is about.
Not her claim that she didn't break the rules.
But her claim that she was being punished in a situation where a man would not be.
[–]Mode1961 10 points11 points12 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
No, the data doesn't show that.
The data doesn't say anything about how often men break the rules compared to how often women break the rules.
Without that data it's impossible to say whether or not men are more likely to be punished for the same infraction.
[–]Canredd 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]_pulsar 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mode1961 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]Aivias1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Well apparently the WTA do not consider coaching to be against the rules, whereas the ATP, who govern the major grand slams, do. So if you want an explanation of why coaching is the only rule women are penalised more on you can claim that they dont actually know the rules.
[–]VegetableConfection 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Splatriarchy 313 points314 points315 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 83 points84 points85 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chasemyers 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Splatriarchy 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iDoomfistDVA 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]--Edog-- 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]iDoomfistDVA 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Splatriarchy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pardonmeimdrunk 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]eadala -16 points-15 points-14 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue 22 points23 points24 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]eadala -2 points-1 points0 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]chinawinsworlds 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]skepticalbob 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]chinawinsworlds 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]frisch85 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]skepticalbob 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]frisch85 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skepticalbob 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lost_garden_gnome 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WithBothNostrils 111 points112 points113 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]montereybay 38 points39 points40 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]VicisSubsisto 96 points97 points98 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoGardE 71 points72 points73 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]neightdog 21 points22 points23 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]well_duh_doy_son -26 points-25 points-24 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grakchawwaa 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]well_duh_doy_son -5 points-4 points-3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grakchawwaa 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]well_duh_doy_son -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Azure_Triedge 40 points41 points42 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]apnudd1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
That's the important thing. The coach admitted the violation, and Williams put on a drama that went like "I'd rather lose than cheat, I haven't cheated", and then people cheered. Talking about alternative thruths.
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Literally everyone does it though. It’s a known thing.
[–]nforne 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]--Edog-- 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nergaal 10 points11 points12 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pubies 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]modern_rabbit 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mully_and_sculder 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]antilopes 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ajbrooks192 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 114 points115 points116 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuckin_bubbles 47 points48 points49 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]SavingStupid 45 points46 points47 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nergaal 21 points22 points23 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuckin_bubbles 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Airforce987 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fickle_fuck 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]taws34 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]not---a---bot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
Because men generally are not fined for similar outbursts. It had nothing to do with who she was playing. Men are given longer leashes generally.
[–]nforne 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I did read the article. I don't care if NY Times generally has a different opinion. That is not relevant. We are discussing this individual article.
The article gives total fines. It does not comment on what constitutes a penalty for men versus what constitutes a penalty for women.
My statement is anecdotal based on watching a lot of tennis. In my opinion male players are allowed to rant for a solid minute or two before being given a game penalty. In my opinion women are held to a different standard. Many professional tennis players, both male and female, have agreed with that. Do you disagree with that assessment?
[–]Endless_Summer 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]more863-also 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]F33N1X 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Entirely untrue and quite the opposite. Men have outbursts way more frequently than women. Men are given more leniency during their outbursts. That is my opinion based on watching a lot of tennis. Do you disagree?
[–]more863-also 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Myopiniondusntmatter 50 points51 points52 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SaggingZebra 41 points42 points43 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]guy_guyerson 46 points47 points48 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skepticalbob 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BoabHonker 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bestprofilename 29 points30 points31 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bozo_the_Podiatrist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]F33N1X 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]barndoor101 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LedZeppelin1602 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]--Edog-- 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ColonelVirus 14 points15 points16 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]antilopes 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ColonelVirus 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fickle_fuck 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endless_Summer 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]perplexedm -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lupinfujiko 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Gohorne1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I put this data to a feminist friend recently, but she argued that “men commit more violations than women in tennis, so it’s not surprising they’re penalised more”. Going on to say loads of men behave like Serena did, but get away with it.
Such an annoying and subjective argument, any ideas of how to counter it?
[–]Redditor005050 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]F33N1X 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_am_jacks_reddit 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]modern_rabbit 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ak3rno 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]frecklearms1991 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BForBandana 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
This has been posted many times before.
The data does not prove it the other way. It proves that in total men have been fined more. Does it say if men have outbursts more? Does it say if when men have outbursts they are given the same leniency as women?
I watch a good amount of tennis. Anecdotally I will say that men have outbursts way more often than women. Also, IMO women are given a much shorter leash than men (e.g. a man can rant for a solid minute or two before being issued a game penalty while a women says only a few words before getting the same result).
[–]nforne 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]mully_and_sculder 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
I realize that. I have no problem with Serena being given a penalty in this situation (although a male tennis player has cursed at Ramos before (another clear violation) and not gotten penalized. Different situation and way less severe of an outburst so I am also okay with no penalty there). I am talking about tennis in general. In my opinion men tend to get away with more than women. Women are held to a different standard. Multiple tennis pros, both male and female, have said the same thing.
[–]nforne 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
The statistics in this article do not disprove my claim. They simply show men are fined more in total.
[–]nforne 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
No.
Agreed, that is curious.
[–]grandmasbroach 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]DrewFlan1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
A discrepancy in what? Criminal sentencing or tennis officiating?
[–]grandmasbroach 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CelestinePat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EntireFeature 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Morningsun92 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zero_Life_Left 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnimalChin- 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lazyBert 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TibortheChechen1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Are you sure that's not Mike Tyson? I have always had difficulty in telling them apart.
[–]Kruciff 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BeneficialBlock -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aerovado -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]chadwickofwv 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grandmasbroach -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]aerovado 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iolex -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]wickedogg1 points [recovered] (15 children) | Copy Link
Serena Williams: It was an unfair double standard to take a game from me as a penalty during the match.
Morons: Her claim that she was fined more than men is totally bullshit!
There is no way she was complaining about the fine during the match because she wasn't fucking fined during the match, she was complaining about the penalty of losing a game for fuck's sake why can't we argue about whether her actual claim was valid rather than making up a bullshit argument that she never made.
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Endless_Summer 13 points14 points15 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]wickedogg1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
What's a fine?
[–]Endless_Summer 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dancing_Anatolia 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]wickedogg1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
So we agree that wasn't what she complained about.
[–]Endless_Summer 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dancing_Anatolia 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_ThunderCunt 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]wickedogg1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Nope, because the complaint was specifically about being penalized a game, note about being fined. Why would she give a fuck about a few thousand in fines when she makes millions.
[–]Lord_ThunderCunt 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]wickedogg1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
It's right in the quote that you posted. She had a game taken away from her as a penalty. She wasn't alleging that men or women get more fines or more penalties. She was only making one allegation; that men don't get games taken away from them for doing the same thing she did.
Maybe she's wrong maybe she's right, but why all the bullshit about her actual claim?
[–]Lord_ThunderCunt 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link