TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

BBC runs article including the facts: "Williams...was one of 10 women punished for code violations at this year's US Open, while 26 men were fined". Headline reads: "Serena Williams' claims of sexism backed by WTA."

Ovv_Topik

September 10, 2018
2473 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/45468290
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title BBC runs article including the facts: "Williams...was one of 10 women punished for code violations at this year's US Open, while 26 men were fined". Headline reads: "Serena Williams' claims of sexism backed by WTA."
Author

Ovv_Topik

Upvotes 2473
Comments 247
Date September 10, 2018 12:53 PM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9emutm/bbc_runs_article_including_the_facts_williamswas/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/bbc-runs-article-including-the-facts-williamswas.894438
https://theredarchive.com/post/894438
Top posts by Ovv_Topik

BBC news just called out the Monetary Policy Committee for hiring 'On Merit', instead of "picking a Woman".

2088 upvotes
June 4, 2018
/r/MensRights

My 10yo Niece, dropping Red Pills in her Suffragette history homework.

602 upvotes
February 10, 2019
/r/MensRights

SO MUCH respect for Boogie! Here he deconstructs feminism identity politics without even trying to.

394 upvotes
June 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Circumcising newborn boys increases their risk of cot death due to the stress of the procedure - and could explain why it is more common in boys than girls, study finds

156 upvotes
July 28, 2018
/r/MensRights

Blatant repost, but too good not to share.

128 upvotes
July 11, 2018
/r/MensRights

More BS statistics from BBC News

80 upvotes
September 20, 2018
/r/MensRights

Because men don’t have relationships, careers, children, health or homes?

55 upvotes
June 7, 2018
/r/MensRights

Boys will be boys!

51 upvotes
January 15, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]RedditIsMyCity 692 points693 points694 points 7 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link

"Sexism" Both opponents are women. What are you on

[–]DanteJ600 276 points277 points278 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mmmm but that ref woulD neVeR penalise a M A N for that

[–]speakingofsegues 110 points111 points112 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Ramos missed a huge opportunity to throw his sexist wrath at Osaka. I wonder how she was able to somehow avoid his taste for blood...

[–]_Mellex_ 79 points80 points81 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

"Asian privilege"

[–]GreyStomp 49 points50 points51 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

15 points to Gryffindor

[–]HogwartsBot 31 points32 points33 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Thank you GreyStomp, for giving 15 points to Gryffindor!

Current score is displayed below

House name Points
Gryffindor 27444
Hufflepuff 25130
Ravenclaw 26012
Slytherin 25743

You can check if your favourite dorm is winning at http://www.dila.si/.


I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. You can read my rules here. If you want to contact my owner, you can message him here.

[–]HugsAllCats 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Good bot

[–]B0tRank -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you, HugsAllCats, for voting on HogwartsBot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

[–]Laengster 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bad bot

[+]GruntySqueakBeak1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

1702 points to Slytherin

[–]HogwartsBot 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sorry, GruntySqueakBeak, but you can not give 1702 points to Slytherin.

I'll give them 20 points instead.

Current score is displayed below

House name Points
Gryffindor 27457
Hufflepuff 25115
Ravenclaw 26012
Slytherin 25763

You can check if your favourite dorm is winning at http://www.dila.si/.


I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. You can read my rules here. If you want to contact my owner, you can message him here.

[–]HappyHound -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bad bot

[+]Coffee_Beer_Weed1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

70 points to Gryffindor!

[–]HogwartsBot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, Coffee_Beer_Weed, but you can not give 70 points to Gryffindor.

I'll give them 20 points instead.

Current score is displayed below

House name Points
Gryffindor 27497
Hufflepuff 25115
Ravenclaw 26027
Slytherin 25763

You can check if your favourite dorm is winning at http://www.dila.si/.


I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. You can read my rules here. If you want to contact my owner, you can message him here.

[–]500Rads 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/z5W8EBHNsLc

[–]HappyHound 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bad bot

[–]Hadashi_blacksky -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

150000000000000 points to Slytherin. :D

[–]Bathroomious 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Laughs in Cho Chang

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He should have disqualified them both and picked a random cis het white man from the audience to win in the name of the patriarch.

[–][deleted] 255 points256 points257 points 7 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link

That's something that people calling this sexism, or discrimination based on sex, can't seem to wrap their heads around.

Is it sexism? Let's find out:

  • A female player is given a warning for a coaching violation, which therefore negatively affects her game and her score. Quantitatively, her female opponent receives a proportionate advantage because of this. In terms of benefit or disadvantage to women, it's a net zero.

"Yes, but men wouldn't get penalized on the same call."

  • A male player is not given a warning for a coaching violation, which therefore positively affects his game and his score (after all, by breaking the rules he effectively got away with cheating). Quantitatively, his male opponent receives a proportionate disadvantage because of this. In terms of benefit or disadvantage to men, it's a net zero.

"So what? It's still a double standard between the sexes and is therefore sexism."

  • This particular example, premised on the assumption that men don't get called on coaching violations, is inconsistent between the sexes, but in neither case are women or men as a whole worse off. The net effect is zero. If women are called more frequently on coaching violations, this has no effect on male players or male games, and vice versa. Furthermore, this inconsistency would only represent a double standard if men and women competed against one another and men received an advantage when women didn't, or received a disadvantage when women didn't. Men and women do not play competitive singles tennis against one another.

"You're missing the point - a male player is much less likely to be called on this infraction than a female player. That is sexism."

  • Then I have a question for you. Accepting your scenario as true, a male player is then also less likely than a female player to be awarded a fair advantage after his opponent broke the rules. Is that also sexism?

[–]greyspot00 48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I love how your pure in-out logic completely breaks down the issue. Once you remove emotion from the problem, everything makes so much sense.

[–]ac714 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Reason will prevail!

-Pickle Party

[–]Stoogenuge 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think we should cut the limes a bit thinner.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That last line doe, that's what people just don't get.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So it all boils down to the players' reactions. If they lose their cool, it's a disadvantage. But if they maintain focus on the game anyway, it's an advantage. Thus, agency rests on the player alone.

[+][deleted] -22 points-21 points-20 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

While your logic is sound there’s a key point your missing.

The psychological ramifications, the negative press around women’s tennis, and the negative reputation for an individual player.

This on a whole shines a light on women’s tennis in a bad way. Which is a net negative effect that men’s tennis does not see.

Someone playing the game during a match will know this and be effected by it which is a disadvantage.

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points54 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, but much of that is Serena's own doing. She called something sexism when objectively there's no evidence to support that and sexism can't be inferred even from inconsistency in application of this rule between men and women (something I've not yet seen evidence to suggest happens).

Upvoted for polite and well-reasoned response.

[–]armaadi 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Serena is shining the bad light on tennis here. Ok, her coach tried coaching her. The problem is that she fell apart and whined to the line judge and accused him of stealing points. She acted like an entitled princess, and that's 100000% on her. Had she handled that penalty like a professional, maybe she could have battled back and proved to the world that women are capable of handling adversity with dignity and grace. But she didn't. The only reason this is an issue is because she acted like a brat. And because she's a woman, everyone in the world is crying how tennis is unfair and sexist. Let's not focus our attention on the woman that beat the bejeezus out of the best woman's tennis player in history.

Osaka deserves attention here. She was beating the snot out of Serena regardless of the penalties, and Serena robbed that spotlight with her bullshit.

[–]78stickup 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, ironically, by trying to shift the blame from Serena onto men, feminists disempower women and offer a horrible lesson to little girls. The lesson (which feminists have successfully repeated over and over again) goes something like this: "the path to achievement is to whine and cry until men give you want you want", not "suck it up and overcome adversity -- this will earn you respect and character."

They have an actual example of a "strong empowered woman" (her opponent) staring them right in the face -- someone who "takes their lumps" and overcomes adversity instead of acting like an entitled child -- but they ignore her. Why? Because the goal, in every single scenario, is to attack men. Not to "empower" women. What they don't seem to understand, or don't care to understand, is that respect is earned. If a woman is simply given something via eg affirmative action or some special program she will not be respected by men. She will be regarded with contempt.

Edit: and before people say, "but Serena has overcome a great deal of adversity and has great achievements," I agree, but at the end of the day if you're not willing to admit fault, if you treat other people like dirt, and if you don't take responsibility for your actions but instead try to shift the blame onto others it's all for naught. You're a loser.

[–]Obwalden 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Serena was the one yelling shit at the ref and had already broken two other rules beforehand.

If women's tennis is known as the "sport where chicks freak out at the refs" then it's her fault.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sorry but if professional athletes aren't acting professionally then to hell with muh psychological ramification of punishments.

She yelled at the ref and broke her racket. No.

[–]KDulius 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Horseshit.

I'm a talented amateur at my sport of choice - Good enough for my home nations team, not good enough for GB (yet)

My coach expects me to have my shit together more than this all the time, but especially in high-pressure situations, no matter what. Kit breaking, a bad line cutter call, people being in my face over something unrelated before I get on the line; doesn't matter. I'm expected to have a handle on my mental game to be able to deal with it.

If I'm expected to act like a god-damned sportsman and athlete, someone who is paid millions should be at the very least held to the same standard

[+]AndyGHK -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

• ⁠Then I have a question for you. Accepting your scenario as true, a male player is then also less likely than a female player to be awarded a fair advantage after his opponent broke the rules. Is that also sexism?

Is... is that not sexism?

If it’s the result of a decision that is differently applied across genders... which you seem to agree is the case... wouldn’t having a male player less frequently be awarded an advantage vs a female player be sexism on the part of the referee? Regardless of how fair or unfair the call is, if men are being called less for something than women, isn’t that a sexism issue?

Maybe I misunderstand, but it seems like “Male opponents aren’t called on this infraction as often as women” is just another way of saying “female opponents are called on this infraction more often than men”—is that not a trend along gender lines that should not exist? Are you implying women break the rules more often in general? Or that the rules are unevenly applied? I mean, I don’t know how much I agree or don’t agree with Serena, but this in a vacuum doesn’t make sense to me.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

which you seem to agree is the case...

I do not agree that's the case, it's what others are saying to defend Serena Williams' claims. I have not seen evidence of it, but my point is that it doesn't matter even if it is true that coaching violations are called differently between the sexes, because what rules are enforced more strictly against men, for example, has absolutely no bearing on women and their games.

[–]PanderjitSingh_k 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re right. The only person claiming females are called on this more than men is a woman who got called on it. Maybe she’s biased. Maybe she’s lying. We know she’s a cheat who can’t control her temper so why believe her on this?

[+]AndyGHK -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

my point is that it doesn't matter even if it is true that coaching violations are called differently between the sexes, because what rules are enforced more strictly against men, for example, has no bearing on women and their games.

But across games and time it’s significant, surely? Any rules enforced strictly for men and not for women would be enforced in a way biased by gender, right? And same for the reverse?

If the same ref calls for Serena and not for a male player, could that be sexism? Or if refs in general call for female players and not for male players, couldn’t that be sexism?

Like—if a judge is shown to rule against women and for men in court (for the same crime), the standard ruling isn’t being applied for one of those two groups of people. And if Referees are used for both male and female games... the application of their rules may very well be different between them. That’s my understanding of how it’s possibly sexist. Thank you for your reply!

[–]mcavvacm 29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Asians all look alike and they're basically white anyway. /Feminism

[–]Bathroomious 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You say that ironically but I've heard plenty of people starting to refer to anyone who isnt black as "white".

Asian people (including lighter skinned Indians) are white.

Middle Eastern people who are non Islamic are white.

These are just two of the more common examples but occasionally you'll hear someone say a black person who is socially and financially successful is "white".

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

as a white man, I find that to be cultural appropriation and racism.

/s of course.

[+]Stevegracy1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

If the races were reversed that would be a completely "reasonable" thing to say... :(

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IK

[–]secureded 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

European whites aren't exactly white either

Europeans are off-white

Japanese are off-white

Koreans are off-white

etc

[–]Me_ADC_Me_SMASH 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lmao I hadn't even noticed this layer

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really cant tell with Serena which gender she is. I am guessing her labia sort of resembles a nut saxk

[+]shaq604 -14 points-13 points-12 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

She's saying she was penalised more harshly than a man would have been, not to do with her opponent

[–]78stickup 33 points34 points35 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are almost never penalized more harshly than men. Just look at the criminal justice system. A study in the UK determined that if female criminals were treated as harshly as males, roughly half of all prisoners would be women.

The only area I can think of where women are treated more harshly by societies are in cases of adultery. Not in the current day west, but in the past and in religious fundamentalist communities. This probably arose due to the uniquely male fear of unwittingly raising another man's offspring (studies show that when this happens, the mental trauma for the man is similar to rape). But even in religious fundamentalist societies, and excepting cases of adultery, women are still treated much more leniently for every other "sin" or crime. "Witchcraft" is one other possible exception, but today in eg Saudi Arabia more men are executed for that "crime" than women.

So it would be quite surprising if what feminists are claiming about female tennis players is true and, lo and behold, it isn't. Men receive more violations.

An argument could be made that umps have it out for Serena in particular -- not because she's black or a woman -- but because she has a history of being extremely nasty toward umps. Eg she previously threatened to shove a ball down the "fucking throat" of a (female) umpire after a foot fault. But even this doesn't stand up to scrutiny: McEnroe was actually disqualified from the Australian Open for acting in a similar fashion. If anything, Serena was treated leniently by not being ejected for her temper tantrum.

Bottom line is that feminists cry "sexism" about literally everything, even when the reality is the exact opposite of what they claim. It's a really awful thing to do -- to single out a man just doing his job and accuse of him being an awful person. They're abusing female social power.

The US media has acted shamefully by backing Serena and tacitly supporting her poor sportsmanship. Would they be acting the same way if a male player had spent ten minutes berating an ump and accusing him of being a liar and a thief? I doubt it. Only one or two articles like this one in the New York Post have reported the situation honestly.

I'll end with the words of former tennis player Greg Rusedski, who reached an ATP ranking of number 4.

"The cries of “sexism” surrounding the Serena Williams story are a red herring. This is about personalities, not about gender.

"The vast majority of players know when to stop arguing with an umpire. But a couple of high-profile names have had trouble in this area: Williams on three different occasions at the US Open, and John McEnroe on a far more regular basis.

The precedents are clear. If you keep raging away, it ends badly."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2018/09/09/sexism-claim-ared-herring-serena-williams-should-apologiseafter/

[–]HeroBobGamer 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're not arguing that women are penalised more harshly, just stating that it's the argument Williams is making.

[–]shaq604 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell to her, I'm just explaining what she was complaining about

Lots of other male players have come out to support her and said men have said worse and only gotten warnings. There is sexism in tennis, I can't say if this is an example of it or not, but I don't think it's clear cut, there's conflicting information

[–]guyau 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why are people downvoting you? You merely cleared up what people are actually complaining about. This sub is going down hill, more knee jerk hive mind behaviour every time I visit.

[–]shaq604 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this sub has been a circle jerk for a while, this isn't really the place for discussion, just another echo chamber

[+]Adezar -14 points-13 points-12 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And the statistics backed up her claim. People just want to validate their sexism and don't want to hear about reality.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And the statistics backed up her claim.

No, they didn't. There have been numerous examples pointed out by commentators on mainstream news sites that this isn't the case at all.

People just want to validate their sexism and don't want to hear about reality.

Here's reality:

Serena losing the game was not due to sexism or bad officiating. It was because she refused to deal with this adversity like a professional athlete and resorted to accusing the ref of stealing her points (she called him a thief for god's sake!), broke her racket (earning her ANOTHER loss of points) and is now going on a tirade about how he was sexist (with media outlets and even the crowd in attendance eating it up) and keeping her down. Oh yeah, and whining about how she's a mother with a daughter as if that's going to magically return those points she lost. I'll bet you any money she's going to, at some point, add in accusations of "Racism".

The responsibility is on her, not some misogynistic bogeyman.

You want to be treated with respect then don't fucking disrespect the ref like that.

[–]shaq604 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are stats and quotes that back up her claim, and some that contradict her, just saying

https://youtu.be/NX8AJvTtt-4?t=540

[–][deleted] 415 points416 points417 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

She's just a sore loser and can't handle the fact osaka beat her. The umpire should have given her a soft warning first, but then for her to berate him like that and a accuse him of being a thief?

She's sexist her self

[–]ABDNZ_ 145 points146 points147 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Try imagining if it was a male player berating a female umpire like that, his career would have been finished.

[–][deleted] 104 points105 points106 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Holy shit, I never thought to do this.

"I am a FATHER, I would NEVER cheat"

Can you imagine a male player threatening a female ump's job? "you will NEVER umpire a court I'm on for as long as you live". It's astounding.

[+]TheGoalOfGoldFish -11 points-10 points-9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, they get a fine and everyone gets on with their day.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not in current year

[–]TheGoalOfGoldFish -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tennis_violations

[–]Rufert 45 points46 points47 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The berating the ref penalty was her third violation in that match. 1st one was for getting coaching during the match, 2nd was for destroying her racket after losing a set, and the 3rd was the one for yelling at the ref.

[–]The_Best_01 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She really is. What a bitch.

[–]Wiegraf_Belias 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

1st one was a soft warning. The second had a point taken, and the third she lost her shit.

Unless you're saying the first warning shouldn't have been anything and then the racket smash be an official warning. That's a matter of opinion of course.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Typical multi-millionaire abusing the help.

[+]infiniteslinky1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (18 children) | Copy Link

It will be racism next when this doesn’t work.

[–][deleted] 85 points86 points87 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It is working though, the wta has agreed with her

[–]UglierThanMoe 108 points109 points110 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Of course the Women's Tennis Association has agreed with her. Not much of a surprise there.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And then they lament about the lack of respect Women's Tennis is afforded by the public.

[–]neofiter 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I went out of my way to watch this match. I sure as shit won't be tuning in to anymore. "Respect". Ha. A bunch of spoiled boo-hooing and acting like a fucking baby. Never again.

[+]BagFullOfSharts -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Watching most sports is boring except for some mma matches. Watching women's sports is even worse.

[+]magamix1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

"EQUAL PAY RIGHTS! it is sexist to pay women less for tennis!!"

At the same time play best of three sets and batches that last an hour and a half to two, vs the best of 5 sets and matches that go 3-5 hours for men.

--- the same WTA

[–]quiznex 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I never understood that. In a lifetime they are playing 100s of less sets compared to their men counterpart.

[–]Magnussens_Casserole 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You'll understand when you realize it's about getting the same results, not earning them.

[–]volksssgemeinschaft 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You'll understand when you realize that Serena and Venus Williams, who are conventionally thought to be the greatest women's tennis players of their generation, got destroyed by two unranked males who smoked between sets.

[–]KDulius 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't this the guy who did a round of golf in the morning and had "lunch with a few drinks" before hand as well

I remember it being pretty embarrassing set of circumstances

[+]FirminhoWithAnH1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

What's it called when she's targeted for being a mother?

[–]captainp42 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mommy Dearest

[–]Code347 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Got to keep the squeaky wheel squeaking.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Isn't Osaka Asian and Jamaican?

[–]TheCanadianEmpire 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Haitian I think?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A mix of Asian and Haitian.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think she will let something like facts get in the way, she had a melt down, and is going to blame anyone and anything she can for it.

[+]Pebo11 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

WIlliams is simply a sore loser. She should be embarassed and ashamed of herself. I really wish we could get to a point that people stop going to the sexism or race card and for some people to just blindly go along with it without actually assessing the situation before jumping on board with ridiculous claims like this.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said.

[–][deleted] 107 points108 points109 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The real tragic thing is now all the controversy is drowning out Osaka's win. Nobody's going to remember anything about her victory, nothing except Serena acting like spoiled brat.

Osaka deserves better. Especially after getting booed at the ceremony by the ungrateful people in attendance.

[–][deleted] 64 points65 points66 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The crowd, commentators, and Williams all owe her a huge apology for tarnishing her victory.

For Christ sake, she was shamed into apologizing for winning. Is this not professional tennis? Next year, everyone gets a trophy and we don’t keep score. Then we hand out orange slices and Capri Suns

[–]speakingofsegues 145 points146 points147 points 7 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

People are using every excuse they can to justify her behaviour.

"She gets drug tested more than others." "She wasn't allowed to wear her catsuit." "She just had a child." "Men don't get called for the same stuff."

I still don't see evidence of sexism. I see a chair umpire notorious for handing out violations handing one out for something the rules clearly states is a violation, and then Serena once again berating officials when she's losing, and then the chair umpire handing out two more.

I mean, unless we're back to thinking that professional female athletes are delicate and fragile people who need special treatment in order to compete.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 87 points88 points89 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

"She gets drug tested more than others.

she gets drug tested more than male tennis players, and female tennis players...that's not sexism, that's called "scrutiny".

Or are we just supposed to pretend we don't see the 100lbs of muscle mass she's put on in the last 20 years.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Not 100lbs obviously, otherwise she would have weighed about 50lbs before that, but it is borderline impossible for a woman to look like that without roids.

[–]hotpotato70 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

She's only 150 pounds?

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's over 6' and thick as a tree trunk and it's not fat. She's at least 220 lbs. I bet her testosterone levels are higher than mine.

[–]KDulius 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That would make her heavier than me.

And I'm a guy.

Who does a quite a bit of lifting

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her test levels are probably higher than yours too.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

185 lbs

https://healthyceleb.com/serena-williams-height-weight-body...

[–]hotpotato70 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/Bt7HE89cgJk

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's what google says

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And Google lists some black rappers at 6ft when in pictures they are barely 5'8

[–]_Mellex_ 35 points36 points37 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That kinda happens when you dominate your sport for a decade lol

What the fuck does she think should happen?

[–]McFeely_Smackup 55 points56 points57 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

you know who doesn't get drug tested a lot? People who don't win.

[–]_Mellex_ 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Loophole

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean it's not really a loophole when you cheat and you still lose lol

[–]speakingofsegues 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HEY! BODY SHAMING!!

[–]78stickup 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

"She gets drug tested more than others."

If that's true (and I doubt it is), it may be because she once locked herself in her panic room and refused to get tested.

[–]HugsAllCats 29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

it may be because she once locked herself in her panic room and refused to get tested.

https://nypost.com/2011/11/02/serena-williams-locks-herself-in-panic-room-in-drug-test-mix-up/

6am is pretty early for someone to show up at my house. But if someone were at my front door at that hour, I just wouldn't answer it. I wouldn't just run inside my panic room...

[–]78stickup 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mix up

lol.

[–]painfulbliss 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it's an expectation that if you want to compete in the tournaments, you will subject yourself to random tests. Don't need to fly off the handle if that happens.

[–]bam_shackle 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The recent mother thing is insane, what the holy fuck has that got to do with anything? I mean I feel sorry she nearly died giving birth but that doesn’t mean she gets bonus points.

[–]speakingofsegues 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. And if she's expecting bonus points for that, maybe she's not ready to be back on the court yet.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And how many mothers are cheaters? Lol

She acts as if women have never cheated at ANYTHING.

[–]Bluelabel 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I mean, unless we're back to thinking that professional female athletes are delicate and fragile people who need special treatment in order to compete.

Should we talk about female tennis players receiving the same prize money for playing 3/5 of the same game the men play?

[–]variegated-anoesis 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah this is the biggest thing that is over looked. Females demanded to receive equal prize money as they deemed it unfair and sexist, so now they receive equal prize money for doing way less than the work of men.

If it was the other way around, there would be an absolute out cry 'that men have to work less for the same prize money and it's sexism in it's purest form.'

I'm sure that the men would be required to play a best of 5 sets or the women would have it changed so they only play a best of 3 sets.

I thought men and women were supposed to be treated equally and that there is gender equality in the workplace?

[–]secureded 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women should play the same length of matches as the men

[–]variegated-anoesis 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly. Otherwise receive less prize money.

Imagine a man working 3 days and gets paid in total $300, and then you have a woman who does the same job but also gets paid in total $300 but only for working 2 days. Clearly there is no gender pay equality.

[–]barndoor101 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And does maximum 2/3s the work the man does.

[–]hosspatrick 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What’s crazy to me is that more women aren’t speaking out FOR playing the same sport as men. I’ve always felt like if I were a woman athlete I would feel ashamed to think I was playing a handicapped version of the real thing, whether it’s tennis, basketball, softball, or whatever. (Softball is debatable as it’s nearly a different sport).

[–]Bluelabel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is my go to argument whenever payment equality is bought up... no one has ever put up an argument good enough to convince me otherwise.

[–]speakingofsegues 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Definitely not.

[–]RuleNo5 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it sexism that women play best of 3 and men play best of 5 but they both receive the same prize money.

[+]Lmnja1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (33 children) | Copy Link

Did the same amount of women and Men Play? Just asking

[–]FreakCERS 49 points50 points51 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

To do a proper analysis, you'd need to count infractions, their severity, how many times they caused warnings, and how often they resulted in penalties.

It could easily be that more men play (or women, for that matter), or that men in general break the rules more often, and thus should have seen more punishment.

EDIT: A quick count of the US Open player list gives me 417 men and 380 women, so all else being even you'd expect more code violations for men, though not by a factor of 2.6 of course.

Thanks to /u/CounterfeitMemes for pointing out my mistake of using the players index, which I guess is all time players. The list did seem oddly long to me, I should have stopped to check the names!

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It looks like you counted the player's index, and that's almost certainly not the list of players who participated in this 2018 US Open (for example, note that John McEnroe is on that list).

There were 64 men and women in each respective knockout tournament, not counting qualifying matches. I don't have a count of the men and women in the qualifiers, but through browsing it looks very even.

[–]kweer 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't have a count of the men and women in the qualifiers, but through browsing it looks very even.

Yes, but men are on the court up to 66% longer each match.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is that 66% time or like “plays”. Idk tennis terms but I’d use the rate penalties/plays rather than penalties/timeplayed

[–]Juventin1897 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For starters, men play best of 5 sets and the women play best of 3.

[–]FreakCERS 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks for pointing that out! Do you have a link to the list of the players in the qualifiers? I'll gladly redo the count there

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright, I was planning on doing it but it looked maddeningly time-consuming. Here's the link:

https://www.usopen.org/en_US/scores/schedule/schedule1.html

It'll be everyone under Q1 to Q4 in Women's and Men's Qualifying Singles. I'm not sure if anyone played multiple games on the same days, but since it's Round 1 -> Q1, Round 2 -> Q2, I don't think so.

[–]igetript 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

1st offense is warning. 2nd is a point penalty. 3rd is a game. It's not like they can just choose to go straight to a game penalty.

[–]FreakCERS 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm no expert on the rules here, but from the commentary I've read it would appear that it's more or less the initial warning that is controversial. Both because that rule is apparently almost never upheld, but also because it didn't need to result in an official warning.

From what (admittedly little) tennis I have watched, I've never seen a warning given for that - but I do not know the statistics on it, neither in general nor from this specific umpire.

[–]78stickup 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Both because that rule is apparently almost never upheld,

It is by this ump. He's given the same warnings to eg Novak.

But yeah, let's condemn an ump for actually doing his job.

[–]FreakCERS -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes because even a cursory read of my comments would make it incredibly clear that I'm condemning the umpire for doing his job... /s

[–]orcscorper 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I read that women play three games to men's five, so men play more games than women even if the numbers of players are equal.

[–]MillorTime 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Close. Men play a best of 5 sets and women play best of 3 sets.

[–]a_posh_trophy 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't be surprised if they complained that men get more money even though they play nearly 2x as many games.

[–]Wiegraf_Belias 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They don't get more money though. That's one of the big things for tennis. The prize is equal for both.

[–]Ovv_Topik[S] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If they are doing less, they are being paid more.

[–]_bpm 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm all for men's rights, but this is just ignorant.

Prize money is based on viewership. Look at the money in WNBA or Women's Soccer, it's tiny compared to the men's versions, because few people watch those.

Tennis is one of the only sports where there's similar viewership for both genders. So it'd be sexist to not have similar amounts of money.

And if you're gonna argue against the fact that biological differences means men play more, well then age is just a number too, and we should expect a 10 year old, a 20 year old and a 50 year old to all have the same stamina level.

[–]Wiegraf_Belias 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't disagree, I was just replying to OP. To be specific, the prize pool in men's and women's tennis is the same.

[–]keiths31 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The prize money is the same for men's and women's.

[–]Ovv_Topik[S] 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

So Women are paid more then, since they do less.

[–]MillorTime 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Since all professions are paid the same and hours worked is the only variable. Equal pay for most sports doesn't make sense because of vastly different interest, and by extension money coming in, but tennis is the outlier here.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's a weird way to look at it. It's professional level tennis, not data-entry.

[–]Ovv_Topik[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

We're supposedly striving for 'Equality'. This explodes that myth.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sporting prize money is based more on the money the event makes rather than a wage or commission system. You're kinda picking the wrong trench to die in.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And who brings in more money, the women playing for X minutes or the men paying for 2X minutes.

[+]redavid -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not an hourly wage. It's prize money and based on lots of other factors.

Men also tend to be paid far more at other joint ATP/WTA events where both men and women play best-of-3 sets. Equal prize money is a rarity still (it's often even starker at the separate ATP and WTA events, where women get less despite often drawing larger crowds, but that's on the WTA to get more money in their deals with organizers and sponsors)

[–]MillorTime 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tennis is one of the few sports this actually makes sense since viewership between men and women is the closet of any sport I'd imagine. I could even see the Serena final having higher numbers than the men's final.

[–]keiths31 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men play best of 5 matches. Women play best of 3. So technically men play more.

[–]Dad365 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt it. Off to google.

[–]IronJohnMRA 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.usopen.org/en_US/players/index.html

[–]boringcarpets 58 points59 points60 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fabio Fognini fined $24,000 for unsportmanslike conduct, so much for "it never happens to male players"

[–]BlueOrange22 49 points50 points51 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The narrative is the opposite of true- it would have been sexist NOT to have fined her. Men are fined for the same thing, so why should the standards be different?

[+]_Mellex_ -13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

BECAUSE BLACK LIVES MATTER

--MSNBC

[+]Adezar -12 points-11 points-10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You should read the article, it helps.

[–]BlueOrange22 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I did read it, understood it, and fundamentally disagree within the context of comprehension. I disagree with the premise of the article.

What do the stats say? Williams, a 23-time Grand Slam champion, was one of 10 women punished for code violations at this year's US Open, while 26 men were fined. Most of the fines issued were for racquet violations - 14 men and five women. Three men and three women were penalised for an audible obscenity, five men were fined for time delays, while four men and one woman were penalised for unsportsmanlike conduct. Williams was one of only two women punished for on-court coaching, alongside Slovakia's Dominika Cibulkova, while no men were penalised for this offence.

The outrage is completely cherry picked. They're ignoring the penalties that were given more to men. The data does not support Serena. Your using the "did you not read the article" tactic, it's very disingenuous. I understand what the article is saying, it's not that I'm "not getting it", I am, I'm just fundamentally disagreeing.

[–]Proteus_Marius 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's absurd to run to Williams' defense, since she was fined and placed on a two year probation in 2009 for exactly this sort of thing. Now in 2018, she's escalating her attack on others in the game.

[–]abacabbmk 44 points45 points46 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Do women need to officiate women's games now?

[–]cyberporygon 48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

New rule. The ref has to be of a more oppressed class than the players.

[–]abacabbmk 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

and blind and deaf

[–]Rufert 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They already are.

[–]abacabbmk 27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ok Serena

[–]78stickup 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was reading a woman's tennis forum (interestingly, they all agreed that Serena acted atrociously and this wasn't about "sexism") and one comment actually suggested that male umps would no longer want to officiate high profile female games and may even demand as much. I certainly wouldn't. Who wants to be accused of being a sexist asshole just for enforcing the rules fairly?

[–]majortom22 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would imagine that demographic of women -ones writing about Tennis- are different from your "run of the mill"

[–]greyspot00 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's actually a genius suggestions. Williams would be incapable of complaining about sexism now. Then it would just be player bias or she doesn't like me.

[–]mr-no-life 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She’s still got the race card in her deck.

[–]barndoor101 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would need to be a non-binary lesbian indigenous otherkin as umpire so they would always be at the top of the oppression pile.

[–]benjwgarner 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The ref has internalized misogyny!"

[–][deleted] 60 points61 points62 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"I have my personal opinion that maybe the chair umpire should not have pushed Serena to the limit, especially in a Grand Slam final," the Serb said.

Now making calls against a woman is bad? Part of any game and championship is dealing with the officiating you might disagree with. To say Williams dealt with the situation poorly is an understatement, she showed an absolute disregard for civility and sportsmanship.

[–]Meistermalkav 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Personally: He should have taunted her with a french accent if it helped to get his point across.

What is she going to do? Smack him one? Then it's game loss due to attacking the ref, and the next one shows up with a crowbar and goes I wish a motherfucker would.

Oh? She expects him to not do the job? She expects him to .... Very well then.

Full penalty for active and malicious cheating, because we only saw the coach coaching, he obviously did not get throuigh the coaches of shut your fucking mouth . Those were utterly disrearded. Same as the training to "Not argue with the umpire", "Not destroy the field or your equipment when you lose" and the training to "maybe act rationally".

I mean, shiet. What next? She gets the next case of roid rage and tells us that "This was not roid rage, when I beat up the umpire, it is sexist to drug test me, or to punish me for it!"

No, it is called playing by the rules.

You may have a personal feeling that you get watched a bit closer then others, but please:

You know from highschool what to do when it is KNOWN to you that YOU ARE UNDER OBSERVATION. Be on your best behavior. Play it safe. Becasuse if you disregard this basic rule, what can I do?

[–]johnny_riko 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From the article:

On all three counts, Ramos correctly penalised Williams by the letter of the law.

Why is this even a debate. She's a sore loser who will try to use any and every excuse. Embarrassment to herself and women's tennis.

[–]AFrogNamedGlenn 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Did her shirt really say "LOGO" above the Nike logo?

[+]GETMONEYGETPAlD1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s designed by Off-White for Nike. Virgil Abloh is the epitome of high fashion gone wrong. Look him up, all of his stuff is straight up stupid.

[–]AFrogNamedGlenn 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow...i guess I'm just not edgy enough to appreciate his artistry. Thanks for the info.

[–]Istalriblaka 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

spills tea

That's homophobic because I'm gay and this is inconveniencing me

[–]-Master-Builder- 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel bad for Osaka. She was probably excited to play against a world renowned icon of her sport, only to have this person throw a tantrum in an international event. As an American, I am very embarrassed for my country on the world stage.

[–]njullpointer 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh, quel surprise that the women's tennis association thinks there was sexism against a women in a women's tennis match where a woman faced off against a woman because the umpire... WAS A MAN. HISSSSSSS.

[–]p3ngwin 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you know what's sexist ?

women playing only 3 sets in grandslams, and men play 5 sets.

yet women demanded, and won, the right to equal prize money.

what happened to "equal pay for equal work" ?

oh wait, she's not complaining about THAT sexism, wonder why... ?

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/wimbledon-2017-sexist-women-three-sets-tennis-players-championship-men-five-williams-murray-a7825086.html

https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/35863208

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

See how she started crying when she started talking to the female official

[–]Meistermalkav 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"You got caught cheating and behaving atrociously!"

"But everybody else said it would be ok if I do it! In fact everybody else does it! You calling me out for cheating is sexist!"

"Nope, it's following the rules, sexism would be to perhaps suggest havuing this discussion when you are not on your period. "

[–]slopecarver 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We need robot referees.

[–]homer1969 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good idea, but then the people who invent, manufacture, program, and service the robots will be vilified by the femnazis.

[–]Youre-In-Trouble 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why we need more women in STEM. /s

[–]Bear2120 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Serena is a self entitled, egotistical superstar. As she should be. We build these people up to believe they’re gods. Then when we defy them, they lash out. You give a child everything it wants and never tell it no. Well, what’s going to happen when someone finally tells the child, NO?

[–]KDulius 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No-one should be self entitled or egotistical, even if they are a super-star.

I agree with the old roman tradition of the servant telling the returning conquering general that they are only human.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I suppose it makes sense that men get 60% more penalties- after all- they have to win approximately 60% more games to get the same prize money.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she’s just a sore loser. A sore loser who ruined an incredible achievement by a young athlete.

[–]Electroverted 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that whole "blindly defending a black woman" thing was so 2016. Get ready to feel the wrath of the tennis community.

[–]WithBothNostrils 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Entitled cunt.

Cant stand her, especially the way she was demanding an apology from the guy she'd just called a thief.

Ban her.

[–]hmspain 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn’t the coach agree he was trying to signal her from the stands? And then the argument becomes, “Everyone does it, and the men don’t get called out for it!”.

Let’s give her the benefit of the doubt “I don’t cheat!”, but once she knows the coach really was trying to signal her (and she missed it), shouldn’t she be pissed at the coach?

[–]crocsim 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Complains about mansplaining ref , while happy to be be mansplained by coach from stands.... apparently mansplaining is telling you what you don't want to hear now.

[–]KDulius 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hasn't this always been the case?

[–]Headsup1958 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We’ve all seen grown women throw temper tantrums, but dayum.

[–]romulusnr 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not a contradiction. WTA is backing the claims.

The stats do say that only women were penalized for coaching.

On the other hand, the stats say that for most other violations, men are penalized much more often than women.

[–]Ovv_Topik[S] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The implication of the headline could never be construed as anything other than: She's right.
The stats show she is not.

[–]azazelcrowley 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist press is pushing a narrative in support of Serena williams and calling the umpire sexist for holding her accountable within the rules for cheating.

Her opponent was also a woman.

Let's look at the situation without feminist bias and nonsense clouding our judgement and imagine for a moment a male tennis player had lost his shit and started berating and ranting at a female umpire and how that would be perceived, especially if his rant contained sexist statements akin to her; "I'm a mother, I would never cheat." and attacks on the gender of the umpire.

This umpire in particular is notorious for being a harsh penalizer and that doesn't appear to change whether the person is a man or woman.

What the feminist press appears to be doing is claiming that men holding women accountable for their actions or punishing them for poor behavior is sexism and vilifying a man for doing his job. This is not inconsistent with the overall theme of mainstream feminism.

Consider the effects of this kind of power play by feminist press with their pushing of a narrative and vilifying people in a way completely counter to factual reality, again, not inconsistent with the overall behavior of the movement. The result is to impact the game in such a way that feminists hold more influence over who is an who is not a good tennis player by terrorizing the institution into compliance through social violence, libel, and so on, and to take away from women at least in some part the opportunity to succeed on their own without feminist backing or approval.

Since Serena is a feminist icon, she is being defended for poor conduct and those attempting to hold her accountable are being vilified by the feminist press and pressure is being applied for standards that benefit her above others and subject her to less scrutiny, thereby transferring power to the feminist press to pick and choose people who gain unfair advantages in the sport, and they will utilize this in the same fashion they have always used this influence, to gatekeep and put their thumb on the scale until only gynocentric misandrists dominate the field. Once again, this isn't inconsistent with the overall behavior of the movement.

[–]3-10 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She cheated. She deserved to lose.

[–]neightdog 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

>gets caught cheating

>throws a tantrum

>breaks another rule by smashing her racket

>threatens, berates, slanders and mansplains ref

Omgaw the lady who made 2 million dollars in an afternoon is being sexisted right on national TV

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Simple, only women can be chair umpires in female matches. Better still, only lesbian disabled muslim black womyn can be chairs in any event.

[–]greyspot00 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are higher on the victim hierarchy so their opinion matters the most.

[–]3-10 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why are you discriminating against the blind?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can the disable be an umbrella term for any disability?

[–]3-10 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Did you assume someone’s disability?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am trying hard not to, but it's a chair umpire ...

[–]HoHoHkHkHjI -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

U can't be Muslim and a lesbian at the same time just saying.

[–]KDulius 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You technically can be.

You'll just be a dead lesbian if you ever act on it.

[–]HoHoHkHkHjI 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True.

[–]truth-4-sale 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stephen A. Smith debunked Serena's sexism claim today on his ESPN radio show.

Take it up with him now...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never attribute to sexism that which is best explained by poor playing.

[–]Melrose_Jac 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I found it interesting that the article failed to define what the WTA is (Women's Tennis Association), but clearly defined all other organizations. Almost like maybe the author didn't want to cast that statement as potentially biased or something....

[–]BoabHonker 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It says in the first paragraph that it's the governing body for women's tennis.

[–]thrway_1000 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Archive -- https://archive.is/WoBAi

[–]GreyTortoise 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As opposed to her sister, Venus Williams, who has stated before that women are more empowered and have more options now than ever. Let's be sure to understand there is a difference between a whining "gimme" feminist and an independent woman. Comments around this subreddit have had me worried about peoples' ability to discern and avoid prejudice.

[–]yaiosuyej 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well the wta just lost millions.

Hello lawsuits.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No steroid user should be calling anybody else a "cheat".

[–]Hateblade 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She needs to go research the extremely sexist religion she follows that doesn't allow it's followers to do any research on it...

[–]westondeboer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did a man play Serena?

[–]ktreektree 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is this even real life. Am I in some sort of dream. I want to wake up.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In any professional situation women feel the rules are for men and not for women.

(ethics, dress codes, sexual harassment)

[–]IntrovertAlien 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's her "whataboutism" that puts me off. I was a fan...

​

Great job, Naomi Osaka! Three Cheers for the Champion: Hip-Hip...!

[–]Oracle712 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She probably would've prefers only women as refs for her competitions. If that's the case I wonder what will be her excuse for throwing tantrums.

[–]Ballboy2015 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haven't seen this mentioned, but she did move into the net immediately after "not seeing" the advice to do so from her coach.

[–]L3tum 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexism

Her opponent was a woman as well.

Racism

Her opponent was (at least partially) black as well and I haven't seen that many female Asian tennis players as well, definitely a minority. And you know how racism and minorities work...

-I-just-pushed-a-turd-out-of-my-vagina-ism

Then don't play.

If they somehow say they should have a rematch or mark the game as whatever, causing Naomi to not have won... The wrath of the pink haired plus sized disgusting womyn knows no bounds.

[–]WeAreJustStardust 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand this? The WTA has backed Serena Williams, that is a headline, inside the article the BBC actually runs through it really well. There's another one headlined ITF Defends Umpire... Just clutching at straws here.

[–]pretzelzetzel 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow this is very men's rightsy. Great post.

[–]nairda89 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She dindu nuffin.

[–]nairda89 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've heard rumors that she is actually a he.

[–]RivuletofLife 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Notice that there aren't any comments allowed on that "article"....

[–]BenSwoloP0 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yOu JuSt hAyT wErMeRn!!!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

8000 points to Gryffindor

[–]cacamalaca 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More ammo for my Trump voting friends to fear leftist ideology in politics and media. Well done, Serena. Idiot.

[+]_Mellex_ -11 points-10 points-9 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not enough people are giving the crowd shit for booing. Fucking Americans. Your hyper-partisan bullshit is making ya'll assholes.

[–]wordfiend99 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol the kind of people who buy tickets to tennis are a very specific type of american

[–]RedditIsMyCity 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

300 people in a stadium do not represent the entirety of America but sure. Fucking Americans

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I felt sorry for Osaka, they made a girl cry.

[+]omegaphallic -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I don't like the idea of player being fined money by their employer, it's stealing from them as far as I am concerned. By making this a gendered issue they miss the point and true issue altogether.

[–]thuglanta 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Break the rules pay the price. They sign the agreement to face the punishment.

[–]omegaphallic -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The law, the actual rules say their rules are invalid and labour laws trump game runs.

[–]wordfiend99 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

n a match where naomi won 3.8 MILLION serena was fined...13k

[–]omegaphallic -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its it's not about the amount, it's the principle.

[–]KnoobLord 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The US Open isnt their employer. It is an organization that holds competitions that the players choose to compete in. They can make whatever rules they want, and the players can choose whether or not to compete based on those rules.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It still has to obey laws. Look maybe they found some kind of loop hole or rules are more lax were they played. Still I don't like it, penalize her point, but don't fine her, the US Open isn't a Democratic level of government and so should not have the authority to level fines.

[–]KnoobLord 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They fined her from her winnings, not her personal money. There are no laws keeping competition organizers from doing what they want with their money, nor should there be. It's their's to give how they see fit.

[–]greyspot00 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it's really screwed up to be fined in sports regardless. Just temp ban people to teach them a lesson.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Honestly I don't think fining them is even legal, there are hard rules on how and why an employer can deduct money from wages, unless it's a court order their needs to be permission from the employee and not blanket permission, which doesn't count at least here in Ontario. I don't think it's that different in the US.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She’s not an employee. Why would you even think that? She’s a competitor in a sporting event.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Fine subcontractor.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She’s not a subcontractor. She’s not an employee of any sort. Where are you getting this? It’s not a team sport like soccer or football. If your local pub has a dart tournament with a $25 prize, if you participate are you now an employee of the pub?

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't base my income on a $25 dart game, where as she depends on the money from sports as her occupation.

[–]--throwaway -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I thought it was all bullshit on her side. She probably would have lost regardless but from what I’ve read, she got violations for things that men usually do just get warnings for.

It was a crappy umpire, not any form of discrimination.

If she could have just been left to lose with warnings rather than code violations, then things would probably have been much better for both Serena and Naomi.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter