According to the new study based on the link it appears when gender rules are reversed in which the women take on more dominant i.e. a modern woman and the men are more passive supportive role, the man is perceived as weak, while the woman is seen as less likable as stated in the following:

Recent research published in Sex Roles explored the consequences for heterosexual couples who do not follow traditional gender norms where the male is the primary provider.  The study’s findings indicate that in role-reversed relationships, the woman is seen as more dominant and agentic, while the man is perceived as weaker. Additionally, women in role-reversed relationships are viewed as less likable, and men in such relationships receive less respect.

The study highlights the ongoing influence of conventional gender norms on relationships and the potential hurdles couples who depart from these norms encounter. The results imply that gender stereotypes in the environment can impact the perceptions of men and women about their partners, potentially leading to negative relationship outcomes.

Thus this does adds fuel into the debate that traditional roles may have validity as those espoused by the red pill such as Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, and Kevin Samuels.

Thus this leads to an interesting question, what is the point of having Modern Women in these Modern relationships, if the outcome is that of a man that has no respect, and a woman who is least liked?

In light of this is the traditional relationship the only path to follow, while the woman can still maintain being liked and the man have some semblance of respect?