TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

British woman, 26, with severe allergy who was kicked off American Airlines flight to New York because she demanded the entire plane had to be nut free describes herself as an 'intersectional feminist'

BrightView00

February 14, 2022
3363 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10506915/amp/British-woman-26-kicked-American-Airlines-flight-New-York-nut-allergy.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title British woman, 26, with severe allergy who was kicked off American Airlines flight to New York because she demanded the entire plane had to be nut free describes herself as an 'intersectional feminist'
Author

BrightView00

Upvotes 3363
Comments 400
Date February 14, 2022 3:39 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/ssdhe3/british_woman_26_with_severe_allergy_who_was/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/british-woman-26-with-severe-allergy-who-was.1102376
https://theredarchive.com/post/1102376
Red Pill terms in post
feminist

Comments

[–]BataleonNL 1715 points1716 points1717 points 4 years ago*422 (12 children) | Copy Link

Well, as soon as she left the plane, the plane actually was nut free!

Edit: thanks for the awards, they're greatly appreciated!

[–]ScatteredKing 141 points142 points143 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

*BA DUM TSS

[–]Uniqueusername360 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

DA BUM SST

[–]cabrasm 58 points59 points60 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it’s always in the comments. always.

leaves an angry upvote

[–]Significant_Help_167 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody seems to have noticed the beard woman next to the nut women. Lovely couple.

[–]Aronacus 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

looking at her boyfriend he's clearly nut free too.

[–]idrwierd 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hoo-HOOOO!

[–]ohgeebus_notagain 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I read the OP and that's the immediate thought I had, so I came here to the comment section to comment in this section, and found your comment that already stated what I wanted to state. Since you have already commented my comment, I will give you my upvote and admiration for your timing of the statement

[–]SuckMeHoff12 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this should be a pasta

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It needed to be said. The gods demanded it!

[–]MotionAction 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Salted or Unsalted nut?

[–]CentralAdmin 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Extra salty.

[–]OracleofFl 365 points366 points367 points 4 years ago* (96 children) | Copy Link

How can an airline assure that a flight is nut free? Maybe they can assure that they aren't serving nuts but how do to assure that every other passenger hasn't brought any onboard? Or a passenger on a previous flight hadn't dropped two peanuts between the seats where the woman is sitting? American airlines specifically doesn't offer any nut free assurances as it their right and they do so in writing. Who is she to demand that they change their policies?

https://www.aa.com/i18n/travel-info/experience/dining/special-meals-and-nut-allergies.jsp

[–]d_nijmegen 206 points207 points208 points 4 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

Who is she to demand they changed the policy's? A feminist, duh

[–]youwannaknowmyname 67 points68 points69 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

coff coff ehm, an intersectional feminist, please! (whatever that means, which is something I don't know)

[–]jw8815 89 points90 points91 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I believe that's code for cunt.

[–]bibkel 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Cunt=nutc. C can sometimes sound like “s” so…

[–]me0me0me 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NutC. Short for nutcase duh ;)

[–]Thanatos2996 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Intersectional is essentially a synonym for Marxist. It basically applies Marxism to things like sex, race, etc. instead of economic class; an intersectional feminist is a feminist who also brings race, sexual orientation, etc. into their accusations of opression.

Put another way, it means that she's a cult member with an insane, bigoted, authoritarian ideology.

[–]LouisdeRouvroy -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then it's not Marxism since Marxism is precisely about economic class.

It's like saying you're a tennis player but you play football because you apply the same energy playing football as playing tennis so you can be called a tennis player despite the fact you play football...

[–]Thanatos2996 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're right, they're not identical, that's why there's a different word. What I said was that it's Marxism applied with identities instead of classes. It's the same underlying framework, just with different variables. Intersectionality still frames everything in terms of power dynamics and opression, only with black and white or gay and straight or trans and cis in place of bourgeois and proletarian.

[–]euroski 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got an intellectual boner listening to this educated discussion.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]curiouscabbage69 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I bet you thought you would be greeted with a crescendo of applause by using the ol' Reddit far left cliche playbook. Backfired on you hun..

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]curiouscabbage69 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, that guy got it so wrong it really made me chuckle

[–]goldenballhair 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine being you

[–]Thanatos2996 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Was that your best stab at an insult? C'mon, you can be more creative than that. If you're going to insult me, at least give me something more witty than "Bible college nerd no have sex".

[–]My_Butt_Itches_24_7 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know a few people who graduated from Liberty. They really liked it there, good choice my friend.

[–]Thanatos2996 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that's not even my alma mater. I really don't know why he singled out the Liberty debate team in particular in his comment.

[–]CentralAdmin 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Your argument is wrong because some women have holes you can't fuck".

Amazing how quickly hypocrites resort to sexism and objectification of women when they want to discredit someone's argument.

[–]me0me0me 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like male feminists are a bunch of predators.

[–]GulchDale 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Intersectional feminist, or feminist who will deny the female liberation movement has only ever been for white women.

[–]CentralAdmin 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have an upvote. It is a knee jerk reaction to white women claiming they deserve more privilege because not being the CEO of a multi billion dollar corporation is the same level of oppression as poor black women (whom they have never met) being abused and oppressed somewhere else, like Africa or the Middle East.

They are profiting off the suffering of others.

[–]Iamlegend_future 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's that bullshit hierarchy of oppression where a black trans homosexual are at the top and a straight white male at the bottom.

[–]HappyHurtzlickn 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In basic terms, it means they bring gender, race, and class into literally every thought they have because they believe that no matter the circumstances, someone has been wronged in every situation in human history. Slavery? RACISM! Bought coffee at a local coffee shop with ethically sourced beans? RACISM! Woke up this morning? RACISM!

[–]el_polar_bear 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's been raised in a world where they actually enforce these kind of rules at schools. A kid with a nut allergy starts and peanut butter sandwiches get banned school wide. Now she expects that kind of extraordinary accommodation everywhere else in life for the rest of her life. It's extreme, but I suspect not a long way out of her experience from life so far.

[–]ejeeronit 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah my son isn't even allowed to take so much as a snickers bar into school because apparently one kid in one year has a peanut allergy.

[–]d_nijmegen 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she's so privileged, being treated as a regular non special person feels like offensive discrimination?

Doesn't sound like a feminist at all! 🤣

[–]kit_ease 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

*policies

[–]d_nijmegen -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bedrijfsbeleid*

[–]fragget_6969 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Airline peanuts are the best too

[–]Notagoodguy80 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I mean theyre literally just planters.

[–]straightVI 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think they're the best because you only get 7 nuts and each is a delicious salty savory treasure, unlike when you brain-dead-eat a whole pound at home and get thirsty and remorseful about your lack of self control. At least that's how I act around nuts. YMMV.

[–]cgduncan 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Currently chain-snacking pistachios, so I've closed the bag now. Thanks for the reminder.

[–]straightVI 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tomorrow You is grateful for the pistachios, ya sweetheart!!!

[–]nosoupforyou 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I made the mistake of buying a back on Friday. It was a mistake because I polished them off on Sunday. Quite tasty though.

[–]willowsonthespot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Planters needs to get their act together and make PB crisps again! Since they are now owned by Hormel who can spend their vast Spam fortune to make us some PB crisps again.

[–]The_Great_Sarcasmo 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

So much of this behaviour is just attention seeking. I used to work as a chef and I've seen someone go on and on about their "gluten intolerance" and then order a burger.

[–]918173882 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Altough nut allergy is serious, not even direct nuts but if there is a little residues of nuts (wich there almost always is in industrial products) it can cause severe allergic réactions, wich can be fatal even in the smallest amounts. Altough yes the airplane shouldnt have to accomodate people with allergies, it should be them who bring their own nut free stuff. Dont take allergies (ESPECIALLY nut allergies) trivially.

[–]The_Great_Sarcasmo 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think you might be misunderstanding. They're quite happy to not serve nuts to people who don't want them.

This woman wants them banned from the entire aircraft.

[–]918173882 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, i was just talking about othee cases as a lot of peoole her seem to downplay nut allergy

[–]Dad-man 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Haven't they found a cure? Isn't the cure nuts?

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's a really slow and relatively expensive therapy that doenst cure it completely and doenst always work

[–]SuspiciousFragrance 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the cure for this one was to send her home

[–]Idesmi 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've had a friend suffocate in front of me because of one little biscuit. That day he was hiding his allergy to avoid looking weak to the girl he liked.

He survived, but could have died if not cared for on the spot.

[–]Affectionate-Chemist -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Should could've of just stayed where she's at

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So what because of biological condition she has no control over she should just stay her whole life?

[–]Affectionate-Chemist -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

no but if shes gonna complain about what other people in their flight that they paid for have then she should stay home where she should have full control over not an airline

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well here she is being overdramatic as nut allergy is not airborne (except for stuff that really leave tons of dusts, like a really dry cookie eaten really closely), plus a lot of airlines have a no nut rule.

[–]Affectionate-Chemist -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From my experience airlines based in the US don't cause you shouldn't be able to tell someone what food they can bring on their flight that they paid for, I have heard of European airlines having no nut airlines though

[–]I_AM_CANADIAN_AMA -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If everyone just stop accommodating these allergies, in a couple generations we would not have it anymore - comedian

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. It's not hereditary but random. Also yeah genocides really bring good eh?

[–]SleepDeprivedUserUK 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously everybody needs to have their nuts confiscated.

Bags must be handled and nuts sniffed out, when found, they need to be removed.

[–]OracleofFl 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Having bags sniffed and nuts handled might be more fun!

[–]CentralAdmin 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Once they discover nuts, they have to bust them!

[–]biggerwanker 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And why isn't this something she confirmed before going to the airport?

[–]OracleofFl 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I would bet that she knew it but wanted to create a media frenzy (mission accomplished).

[–]biggerwanker 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess, she's done kind of influencer?

[–]Mythandros 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's a special little "snowflake", that's who. /s

[+]918173882 -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Though nut allergy is serious, not even direct nuts but if there is a little residues of nuts (wich there almost always is in industrial products) it can cause severe allergic réactions, wich can be fatal even in the smallest amounts. Altough yes the airplane shouldnt have to accomodate people with allergies, it should be them who bring their own nut free stuff. It's not something that should be took trivialy, nut allergy is one the most serious.

[–]throbbing_tromboner 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's some of the things this woman could have done rather than acting like an entitled fuckwit:

  • Let the airline know ahead of time so that they didn't try and serve her nuts - they will take this seriously since they don't want to turn the plane around or have someone die on their flight
  • Taken wet wipes on the plane and cleaned her own seat and tray table to ensure there was no nut residue
  • Worn latex gloves to make sure there was no chance of accidental transfer due to contamination of surfaces
  • Packed her own snacks, meals, and drinks and taken them on the plane in a sealed, sterile container
  • Packed an Epipen just in case she did have an allergic reaction

[–]camerontylek 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you'd have to look to the ADA for language on compliance with allergies. I'd assume that if allergies were defined as disabilities then AA would have to comply with her request? Then again, since obviously there are different severities to allergies, would AA be ADA compliant if they met the minimum by not offering her nuts during the flight?

It sounds like her allergy is indeed severe but she's angry because AA removed her from the flight because it was the easiest way for them to mitigate risk.

[–]_DirtyYoungMan_ 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being that it's an enclosed space that relies on recycled/filtered air they cannot guarantee that there are no nuts present on the plane. It's like a restaurant telling someone they can't guarantee there's no cross-contamination. It's easier to deny service than it is to fight a lawsuit.

[–]NuclearTheology 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AA has it in writing they cannot guarantee a nut-free airplane even with all the cleaning they do. The best they can do is simply not offer her the nuts in the first place

[–]Tarbel 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's a customer and can demand all she wants. The airline can also just decide not to serve her following those demands.

Obviously the airline can't ensure (without more costly procedures) that the flight is practically nut-free, but I would definitely hope they sweep through and clean well enough to get out the garbage left from previous passengers. Which would include two peanuts between the seats or a leftover turd between the seats.

[–]DrunkenMonkeyFist 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Airport shops sell huge bags of mixed nuts. Even if the airline doesn't serve nuts, it doesn't mean there won't be several pounds of nuts on every flight.

[–]BrightView00 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's actually some really good points

[–]v7z7v7 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

I believe Southwest has some level of assurance. They at least have committed to not serving nuts onboard their flights. Most reasonable people will just ask the other passenger to not eat nuts if they have an allergy and see that they are eating nuts. That being said, there is a very valid argument to not wanting to fly when the flight is serving nuts as flights are not required to stock epinephrine, let alone enough to keep even one passenger alive long enough to get treatment. While I’m sure the woman in the article is the nuttiest thing on the plane, there is a very valid argument as to why planes and passengers should not have nuts on flights or to be extremely careful.

[–]Mundane-Vegetable-31 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Most reasonable people don't bother other people about their meals.

[–]v7z7v7 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

They do if being careless about that food could result directly in death.

[–]Mundane-Vegetable-31 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't work like that.

[–]v7z7v7 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

You clearly don’t have severe allergies.

[–]Mundane-Vegetable-31 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

You would be severely wrong.

[–]v7z7v7 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Then you should know the seriousness of severe food allergies, especially on planes.

[–]Mundane-Vegetable-31 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I do and this does not and has never happened. Stick to your own food and you'll be fine. The rest of this is mythology.

[–]v7z7v7 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Well, I am starting to question the severity of your allergy if you can only have a reaction if you are the one directly eating it, but ok. I’ll just hope to not sit near you on a plane and bank on the decency of others. Cheers, mate

[–]918173882 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Altough nut allergy is serious, not even direct nuts but if there is a little residues of nuts (wich there almost always is in industrial products) it can cause severe allergic réactions, wich can be fatal even in the smallest amounts. Altough yes the airplane shouldnt have to accomodate people with allergies, it should be them who bring their own nut free stuff.

[–]kit_ease 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wich?

[–]918173882 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The peoples with nut allegy should bring their own nut free stuff

[–]kit_ease 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which*

[–]easyfeel 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if she’s the nut?

[–]newtonism 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also airborne nut allergies are a myth.

[–]MobileAudience -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps she is used to flying on other airlines that were accommodating to her? I don’t know about Southwest’s official policy, but I know that when I was growing up we would ask the gate agents if they could do a quick sweep of the plane for peanut debris and to not serve peanuts. They were always polite and agreed (with one exception, though that’s because they didn’t think that peanut allergies even existed). On the airplane at the start of the flight, they’d make an announcement that due to passengers with peanut allergies, they wouldn’t serve peanuts that flight and would serve pretzels instead. They also requested that passengers not eat their own peanuts during the flight. Now granted, none of this was policed. AFAIK, no one got in trouble for eating their own peanuts. It was a request to be nice and that’s pretty much it besides not serving peanuts.

Nowadays I mainly fly Delta and they don’t even seem to have peanuts as snacks anymore. But yeah, this lady doesn’t have much of a leg to demand they change policy. It kinda sucks, but if you’ve got a peanut allergy you yourself have to be careful and can’t rely on the world to accommodate you. In her case, I’d say it’s her responsibility to fly on an airline that’s more peanut allergy friendly, even if it costs more.

[–]Mundane-Vegetable-31 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nut allergies can absolutely be fatal, but it doesnt fucking work like this. At all.

[–]TheEternalGhost 471 points472 points473 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Kicked off a plane for having a nut allergy... What a complete and utter fucking lie. If she got kicked off it was for making a spectacle of herself after being told "no".

[–]Bone-Juice 143 points144 points145 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she got kicked off it was for making a spectacle of herself after being told "no".

Yea but it's hard to play the victim card if she had put it that way.

[–]ATXthedude 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, there's seems to be a large portion of this story she's leaving out for sure.

[–]usernameinvalid9000 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The last flight I was on had no peanuts because of someone's allergy if she'd asked in advance they probably would have done it, she likely just kicked off about it when she was boarding.

[–]TheEternalGhost 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems like they told her that they won't serve peanuts but can't stop other passengers from bringing their own, and die to her special snowflake intersectioality she had an entitled hissy fit.

[–]yakimawashington 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing is, no one except those on the plane knows for sure. This article is honestly shit. I have no idea why they wrote it. They literally just went to her social media pages, found her side of the story in her tweets, looked around for some more info about her that she's posted (e.g. she's a feminist and electrical engineer PhD researcher), and threw it all together to make an "article". They have no comment from personnel from plane, no witness accounts, not even a comment from the girl. They even asked for people who were on the plane to contact the author so they can actually write something about it incident. But they had to throw in that she's a feminist (info that was pretty irrelevant to the story and that they had found on her social media) in the headline because they knew people would scoff and eat that shit up with that "typical feminist..." mentality.

Unfortunately, that's the risk you take when you take to social media to broadcast your complaints. The mob and/or media doesn't always end up siding with you.

[–]N180ARX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, no one except those on the plane knows for sure. This article is honestly shit. I have no idea why they wrote it.

The Daily Mail is one of the shittiest news outlets in the UK, if you can even call it that.

Full of tripe and rubbish, horribly biased, clickbait titles which seems to cater for old people who bang on about how amazing the British empire once was.

They wrote it cos they needed something to write to cause outrage about how this poor PhD student who went business class was horribly discriminated against for being an intersectional feminist by those disgusting patriarchal yanks.

[–]jinnyjonny 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, that was the Optometrist that made a spectacle of himself.

[–]Sec_Hater 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Seems like a dumb stewardess was forcing nuts on her? odd.

[–]TheEternalGhost 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was probably offered a teabag and took it the wrong way.

[–]BoogerBrain69420 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well she is an interracial or transsexual feminist or whatever.

[–]Troby01 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She probably said something to the effect of " I will die if people eat nuts around me". So in order to save her life she was not allowed to board. The first step of inclusion to to exclude everyone not like you.

[–]Next_Seaworthiness24 134 points135 points136 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Some peple think they are the main character in this world 🌎

[–]GuitarLive1176 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/iamthemaincharacter

[–]CaptainPunisher 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No shit. Everybody knows I'm the star of this show!

[–]Bootybandit6989 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Checked the Twitter.Glad people are calling her entitlement out.With the occassionally soy sjws trying to cover lol

[–]HugChampion2019 111 points112 points113 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A cunt is what the rest of the plane would describe her as

[–]T-R3x-Da-Sh1t 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was going to say douche but this works as well

[–]gratefulphish420 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How could the plane be totally nut-free if she was on board?

[–]LividLager 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A salty nut at that.

[–]NPC1938356-C137 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I prefer it roasted, but salty nut is fine i guess

[–]just_taste_it 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bring a big bag of mixed nuts on every flight.

[–]FlamingTrollz 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Inter-something-something douchebag.

Got it. 👍🏼

I feel bad for anyone that has to be around her.

[–]my_downvote_account 43 points44 points45 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

As I had nfc what 'intersectional feminism' was, I looked it up:

By adding the idea of intersectionality to feminism, the movement becomes truly inclusive, and allows women of all races, economic standings, religions, identities and orientations for their voices to be heard.

Of course - more woke, pandering identity politics...

[–]ScottyINeedMorePower 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

allows women

So it's woke sexism.

[+]HBag -27 points-26 points-25 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Don't hate on feminism getting more inclusive, it leads to less pussy passes. It's just a step away from being gender-intersectional feminism where people of all all identities, orientations, and genders can be heard.

Though I think you'd have an easier time labelling this as "feminine woman feminism of girlhood" than the much overused and vague term "woke." Woke is the boogeyman at this point.

[–]my_downvote_account 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't hate on feminism getting more inclusive

There's absolutely zero proof it was ever NOT inclusive. There's lots of pictures from the 60's feminist movement that seem to show a fairly diverse crowd.

And that's really my problem with the whole thing - it's not clear to me that these people are solving actual problems vs. making shit up to justify the $200k in tuition they spent on their gender studies degrees.

[+]HBag -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Careful though. Academia is an appropriate place to explore these ideas, bullshit or no. It's when they bleed out into mainstream culture (see above) that it's a problem. In College/University, you can argue using facts and logic about why such and such value system might be flawed. Something like "intersectional feminism" can be soundly knocked around until it evolves into something better or dies entirely. I think the increase in these fringe weak theories is due to the increasing prevalence of lazy arguments in academic institutions. People have adopted buzzy nomenclature like "woke" as an umbrella dismissive. When the only argument against your theory is a culture that can't be specific, you're probably going to take it as an invitation to go ahead and spread it around.

[–]WolfShaman 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Don't hate on feminism getting more inclusive, it leads to less pussy passes. It's just a step away from being gender-intersectional feminism where people of all all identities, orientations, and genders can be heard.

I don't think I would ever hate on anything be more inclusive.

But how does it lead to fewer pussy passes?

And do you really think feminism will be a safe place for men to speak on anything other than approved feminist ideas? Maybe at some point, but probably not within the next 2 or 3 generations, if even that soon.

[–]HBag -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

More inclusive means less pussy passes by definition. Isn't that what pussy pass denied means? That you don't get special treatment for being a woman?

I was being facetious when I said give it a bit more time and it'll let more genders in. I guess it's hard to take as a joke because sometimes reality mirrors parody.

[–]WolfShaman 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But more inclusivity doesn't mean less special treatment for women. Maybe you're assuming that feminism is a movement for equality?

It didn't come across as being facetious. Just my opinion, but when you're trying to have a discussion, it's not a good idea to put a facetious idea in the same paragraph as a serious statement.

[–]HBag 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you're conflating inclusivity with...well exclusivity. The goal of inclusivity is to eventually include everybody. When everybody is included, everybody is treated the same because, if they weren't, a group is being excluded from that same treatment. So if a value system, let's say "The law" as an example, were inclusive, all humans under it would be treated equally. A man committing crime X would get the same as a woman committing crime X with no easing of judgement because the woman is a woman (i.e. no pussy pass). More inclusion works toward this end.

And yeah, I'm terrible at not trivializing my own arguments, but I pay for that right in karma ;P

[–]WolfShaman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not conflating anything. Inclusivity has nothing to do with being treated equally. This is evidenced by almost any group of people. Some are held in higher regard than others, and some get privileges that others don't.

And now you're trying to say the law isn't inclusive, because of conviction/sentencing disparity? I'm sorry, but the law is inclusive. If it was exclusive, things would be legal for one and illegal for the other.

I see what point you're trying to get to, but inclusivity is not going to get you there. The WAWE would have to be destroyed, and women would have to be treated equally (instead of better).

[–]HBag 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

the practice or policy of providing equal access to opportunities and resources for people who might otherwise be excluded or marginalized, such as those having physical or mental disabilities or belonging to other minority groups. 

Inclusivity has nothing to do with being treated equally.

Yeh mmkurr

[–]barn9 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'Wacko wench' seems more descriptive.

[–]Mythandros 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Intersectional feminist" is just another way of saying "bat shit crazy ass bitch."

[–]AtoFtw 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another shred of evidence supporting that going to college doesn't automatically mean you're very smart

[–]Flypflap91 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Its standard procedure to not sell items with nuts in them and inform even the pilots they shouldnt eat peanuts when theres an extremely allergic passanger on board

[–]kit_ease 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

passenger*

[–]JakeDC 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Intersectional feminist

That is just a fancy way of saying "dangerous moron"

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When you're so rich that you think hundreds of people should bend to your whims, but not quite rich enough to buy your own airplane and hire a pilot....

[–]princekaylon 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Insufferable cunt

[–]babybopp 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Poor boyfriend

[–]filthydank_2099 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Her boyfriend looks like he’d coddle and praise and support that behavior.

[–]singularity48 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's pegging him. I believe that relationship and its roles have to be reversed.

[–]hondoford 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No one owes you a flight to NYC you twat

[–]akihonj 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The entire plane needs to be nut free, so they kicked her off the flight. She got what she wanted.

[–]Kingzer15 73 points74 points75 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Never really considered the possibility of someone with a severe nut allergy then again if a nut can kill you through the air maybe it's just God's plan.

[–]my_downvote_account 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

With credit to Louis CK.

[–]raffes 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Louis CK very relevant to this topic of a woman complaining about unwanted nut.

[–]918173882 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it should be the person who has the allergy who brings something nut free for her. But nut allergy is really serious but airborne, avoiding deaths is always good.

[–]ScottyINeedMorePower 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Maybe we should be focusing on eliminating the genetic lines cursed with this this life/death sensitivity to a natural substance rather than eliminating this natural substance from the face of this earth in favor of catering to this genetic plague.

[–]LookInTheDog 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah let's eliminate weak gene lines, that's a policy that's always led to good results in the past!

[–]k0unitX 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You say that, but imagine if no gene line ever went extinct during the entire existence of the human race.

Humans, on average, would not be nearly as strong or smart as they are now.

[–]LookInTheDog 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem most certainly isn't the fact that gene lines go extinct. It may not even necessarily be a problem for humans to intentionally make a particular gene line go extinct. The real problem is that in the past, if a human had (or thought they had) the actual power to intentionally make a gene line go extinct, they tended to not use that power in reasonable ways.

Sure, gene lines have gone extinct through natural selection, and that has made humans "better" in some cases (though not necessarily all). That's not relevant though, when deciding if humans should try to do it intentionally.

[–]antariusz -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm more in favor of the bill gates wipe out 80% of ALL humanity plan. I wouldn't want to be accused of being discriminatory.

[–]918173882 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah eugenics is so cool, killing people on basis of their genetics only ever brought good right? /s. Though seriously, genocide is not a good idea, nut allergy is not hereditary either.

[–]ScottyINeedMorePower -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I never said killing people. There are cucks out there getting vasectomies to prevent future white oppressors from spawning, it would be nice if they were as woke about passing on deadly diseases.

[–]taco_truck_wednesday 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not an actual thing. Just an urban legend and things mom groups say.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mrbubbles8723 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re really not helping your cause when you sound this stupid...

[–]Foreign_Page_9552 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn didn’t expect to see this here, why don’t you save these comments for r/conservative and r/DonaldTrump

[+]RoundSilverButtons -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Trump subreddit is that-a-ways --->>>>>

[–]harsh4correction2 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The herd has been culling itself lmao

[–]Kingzer15 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wrong person dude. I got the vaccine twice, 13 months later:

Still not Sick Still not Dead Still getting Boosted

[–]Bone-Juice -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Using that logic, I've never had cancer so therefore it must not really exist.

[–]TragicSemiautomatic 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another quip from the peanut gallery

[–]bardownhalfclap 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course she does.

[–]AzLibDem 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As long as she was on the flight, it was never going to be nut free.

[–]itsokayimhandsome 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist/Eco feminist are the nuttiest people, they will cry about saving the planet and pollution and then take flights to travel for vacation. LOL

[–]DearestBurrito 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"It was also not part of the company's policy to make an announcement about food allergies while on board, she later alleged. "

What the fuck was she actually thinking it would happen "ladies and gentlemen your attention please, due to this one passenger that has a food allergy , we can't give nuts to ANYONE on the plane. This person is very important. Thanks for your understanding and feel free to snack on the complimentary paper bag for the puke".

[–]Loschcode 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/DontPutYourDickInThat

[–]Miserable-Lemon 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never forget, feminism has always been about controlling men

[–]supercheese69 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

One time I was getting a haircut and this 16 year old kid opened the door, poked his head in and asked if there were any peanuts in the shop. The barber said no. He clarified any open Snickers bar anything that has peanuts because if he's in a small room (it was a small barber shop.) With light air circulation he could go into shock. Felt bad for him.

[–]918173882 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Altough it's pretty weird, nut allergy isnt triggered by airborne sources normally, only by eating stuff

[–]supercheese69 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well he was pretty confident he would die so.....

[–]taco_truck_wednesday -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because his parents told him that. It's not a thing.

[–]RedditModsRCunts888 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

makes me want to cover myself in peanut oil

[–]Bone-Juice 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/StoriesThatEndedTooSoon

[–]FBlack 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a fucking idiot

[–]SkinDrone 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perfect example of "you have to change what you do to suit me".

[–]WhoRoger 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Is that a thing? A nut allergy so severe that you can get a reaction just from being near them? Now that has to suck.

[–]CaptainPunisher 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Within reason, peanuts do have dust from the shells, and that can get airborne. If someone is truly and severely allergic, that dust could be fatal of it were to be stirred up and blown around, especially within a confined space.

Now, the reasonable part of me says that the air circulation system has a decent particular filtration system to minimize the recirculation of dirty air, whether we're talking dust and allergens or various microbes and pathogens. Sick people fly all the time, but the whole plane doesn't suffer; maybe those in the immediate vicinity of patient zero. Still, very few things in this world are 100% effective.

At the end of the day, we are each responsible for our own health and should not expect the world at large to keep us safe. If she IS that sensitive, she should be masked up with her own portable air filtration system throughout the day.

[–]WhoRoger 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I believe shells could be dangerous, but nuts served on planes are just the nuts (typically roasted) without the shells anyway...

[–]CaptainPunisher 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Generally, yes. But I'm going on the assumption that there's likely still some sort of shell dust that can make it through the whole process. It would take a series of low probability chances that anything would ever happen, but not impossible. She seems to be one of those that didn't recognize the difference between possibility and probability.

[–]just_taste_it 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

STAY HOME!

[–]CaptainPunisher 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly!

[–]spooksdenimes 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I got curious about how airborne it was and the potential for an allergic reaction, and found two interesting medical articles that seem to conclude that, in most cases, being in the vicinity of peanuts and getting in contact through airborne particles will not cause any violent reactions.

https://healthtalk.unchealthcare.org/can-simply-smelling-peanuts-cause-an-allergic-reaction/ - mentions airplanes.

https://ki.se/en/research/no-danger-of-peanuts-in-the-air

[–]CaptainPunisher 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll take your word for it. I was just giving the most extreme case. I'm certainly not advocating for her response.

[–]iostream64 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no way the airline can guarantee zero nuts of any kind on a plane unless there are several other layers of things accounted for.

1 - they'd need to physically search every piece of on board luggage and even people's pockets not just x ray because peanuts/nuts won't show up in them.

2 - they'd need to ban their flight waiting area stores from having any nut products.

No one's ever going to guarantee that besides a fucking private jet because of how impossible it would be to do so without extreme expense.

I'm sorry your allergy is so severe that even the dust can set you off, but if you know you have such an extreme allergy you should know by now that most of the due diligence is on you. Especially if most people don't know.

Guessing she's one of the "withdrawing covid restrictions is eugenics of the disabled" types.

[–]Ninja_Arena 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyone is shocked she has an overcomplicate label to describe herself and that label is focused on her having more freedom by way of demonizing others based on their labels she likely also applies to them.

[–]time_over 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

say to me you never heard no before in your life without saying to me never heard no before in your life

[–]BayBel 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess when you look like you have a stick up your ass you have to act that way too. Entitled much?

[–]Atlas88- 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

It’s impossible to ensure an allergen-free environment, but is it unreasonable to ask small accommodations such as serving chips or pretzels instead of peanuts for a flight? I don’t think it’s that big of an ask…

My wife was a flight attendant for a different major airline and if my memory serves correct (she’s not nearby for me to ask for certain) they didn’t have to serve peanuts but couldn’t force passengers not to eat peanuts they had brought into the plane themselves. Flight crew could ask the plane to voluntarily not eat nuts but couldn’t enforce it. If that’s wrong, it’s not because she misinformed me but rather my memory is flawed.

-edit- She just texted me back. Policy on their airline was they cannot ensure an allergen free environment. They had the option of not serving nuts but couldn’t enforce passengers from bringing their own.

[–]SirDerpingtonV -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe don’t bring it up at the gate, when the plane has already been loaded?

[–]Atlas88- 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The timing makes no difference. Peanuts aren’t served until they are up in the air and airline policy won’t change regardless. It’s not like ordering a special vegetarian meal or anything that needs advance preparation.

I still don’t see why a reasonable accommodation couldn’t be made. Take gender out of it. On one hand is a human with a potentially life threatening allergy, which admittedly can’t be totally avoided but risk can be minimized. On the other hand… a cheap bag of salty peanuts?

[–]coda128371 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Other airlines do remove nuts from their snack list if a flier gives them advance notice. The problem here like you were saying is AA doesn’t even do that, if a customer has an allergy and isn’t aware nuts were going to be served they’d have to leave the plane like she did, which is a problem. Like by their contract AA has to serve this item. People are only criticizing her because the dailymail included a completely pointless phrase about her being an intersectional feminist, like that’s not even something she said about the event itself.

[–]carolinacasper 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She seems kinda nutty.

[–]Pennywise626 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She'd hate me. I always bring my own peanuts on flights

[–]that_was_me_ama 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AA actually apologized to her. Shame on them. Don’t encourage this behavior.

[–]NotSoRichieRich 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she's entitled and mentally ill. She's a two-fer!

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She has an allergy so I can’t eat my peanuts?! Screw her!

[–]University_Is_Hard -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its literally standard operating procedure in most airlines that if you have a severe allergy to nuts they withhold selling nuts. I have had it happen on my flights multiple times. Because of the air circulation

[–]Dawsberg68 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She looks exactly like what you would expect a zoomer Karen to look like

[–]catsdontsmile 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Saw an ex FWB on tinder, it had ended badly, saw her profile said "intersectional feminist in an open relationship" and immediately thought to myself "holy shit I dodged a bullet there"

[–]techieguyjames 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She would have been very difficult when once in the air anyway. Good on them for getting her off.

[–]RickValassi1 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That guy looks like a cheap version of Tony Horton.

[–]rikwebster 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Keep my nuts out of your mouth.

[–]HurtigOrvar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a "nut-having person," I object to a "vagina-having person" saying that I must leave or be castrated. Not okay.

[–]ArthurHaroldKaneJnr 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her fiancée should have continued the flight and cancelled his return trip.

[–]Dowy 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where the fuck is Ricky Gervais when you need him.

[–]farleys2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“Who’s been eating nuuuts!!”

[–]Tyrone_Thundercokk 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell you what. Take a fucking boat. Better yet. Stop traveling because we have enough dumbasses here. We full, bitch.

[–]Relaxedbear 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate this. I'm deathyl allergic to peanuts. I'll always do my due diligence to let the people next to me, not to not eat nuts, but just to make sure they wash their hands, as a simple touch can make me very very ill. This is a me problem, and literally everyone I've ever had to advise about my allergy has always been incredibly thoughtful and accommodating. To expect an entire plane to accommodate your allergy shows a lack of care for people trying to live their lives. If I'm sitting next to you, yes I'll ask you to be careful. In no way will I ask you to change your eating habits or inhibit your ability to eat what you want. What a dumb fuck.

[–]godca_grema 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

If you're that lame that a nut from 12 feet away can kill you, stay at home.

[–]918173882 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

It's not being lame though, you cant choose your genetics. Also nut allergy is not trigerred by airborne source but by food, and the problem is that almost every industrial products have some traces of nuts. Altough i agree it should be on the nut allergic to bring their own nut free food into the plane, the only responsability of the plane should be to have to medication nescesary to avoid death in case of an allergic reaction.

[–]Stwike_Him_Centuwion 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Brought to you by the Department of "I just said I can't choose my genetics, but that act of nature which means I can't do some things in life that most others can do is an injustice, and reality should adapt to me, I should not have to adapt to reality, to fix the injustice".

If God, nature, or the universe gave you a fatal nut allergy, and the world can't be purged of all traces of nuts, the responsibility is on you to avoid it to the maximum extent possible, don't go where nuts are, and be prepared with your own lifesaving meds if you get caught by fate.

What else should all airplanes (and all other places human beings elect to go) stay stocked up on, and their staff of non-medical personnel trained to responsibly and properly administer, so as to avoid getting sued to death as a thank you for trying to save the life of a person who had a medical emergency, be it predictable and avoidable or not? They idiot-proofed defibrillators and places have those around, so that's good. Should we keep insulin in stock everywhere, and train Amtrak conductors and teenage Baskin Robbins ice cream scoopers and "they must be around here somewhere, this place must have some employees!" elusive Costco staff etc to save people going into diabetic shock by injecting them with what they somehow are supposed to know the sick person needs? Lifesaving asthma inhalers? Anti-clotting IV meds for people who've had a stroke where every second counts?

If you're epileptic, you're not allowed to drive. It's not your fault you're epileptic, but do we convert all vehicles, roads, etc into bumper car parks that can keep people from dying in any speed or type of car accident, so people screwed over by nature can enjoy their right to drive? No, we sadly have to keep them from driving to protect them and others.

Where does the nonsense end?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]918173882 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If someone stab you, it's not your fault not to have developped super thick skin. When someone whose life is threatened is around dont be selfish: do what you need to keep him alive, it is only a temporary, minor inconvenience to save lives. For your example, here it's like if you shoved a screen of flashing colors into an epilectic's face.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+]918173882 -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Pushing nature as an argument is a fallacy. If you want to respect "the good old natures way where people dies" then go live in a cave with no clothes, medecine or technology. Airlines and most public places should have medication for every common danger.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Please entertain us further by listing even the top ten common dangers that airlines and most public places should all have the medication to handle.

Ok.

1: defribrilators 2: at least one pen of insulin 3: an epipen or other medication in case of grave allergy 4: TPA in case of a stroke

These are the most common and dangerous. Man, seriously, you know you're wasting your time? The longest walls of text, the fanciest sentences on thesaurus wont make for the lack of basic human empathy you have. Dude, that person could be your daughter, your sister, your mother, anyone, would you like her to die because people cant bother having a temporary minor inconvenience to save her life?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's rich coming from you

[–]just_taste_it 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

STAY HOME!

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

"How dare you live! You have a genetical disease that isnt your fault! I'm not giving up my snickers for 10 min for you not to die"

[–]just_taste_it 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I like you. I have a chronic illness, I need food when I need food. I carry a huge pack of mixed nuts, salamis and cheese on every flight I take. If I get stuck the tarmac for 4 hours I will eat like a king while you die of nut allergies. Sorry.

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I dont have allergies, but... man, what the fuck? You know the person with nut allergy could be anyone, your daughter, your brother, your mother, anyone, show some basic empathy, it's a fucking life. What chronic disorder? If it is life threatening ok (also in real life nut allergy is not airborne except for things that leaves a shit ton of dust like biscuits, so in any case the person in the person in the post is wrong to want to make sure nobody has it, altough other airlines have this as part of their policy) but otherwise it could save a life, plus nut allergy death is not pretty, the face swells and becomes red while the throat tightens, wich cause suffocation

[–]just_taste_it 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Stay home! I'm allergic to idiots and selfish people. I will eat what I want when I want. Next, people are going be allergic to all food. NO FOOD ON PLANE!

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Is wanting not to die being selfish and idiot? And people arent making their allergy up, it's a real medical condition.

[–]just_taste_it 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

That's cool, stay home. If you have a legitimate medical condition STAY HOME. You don't get on a plane and hope I won't eat a pound of nuts. I'm pretty sure you are gluten free. STAY HOME!

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

DONT LIVE! I WONT LATCH OFF MY SNICKERS!

[–]mark979kram 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Electrical engineer my ass, I bet she warms her bath water with the toaster.

[–]Skeletors_Sack 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The only way the plane could be nut free in her eyes is if there were no guys on the plane

[–]Terbario 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no nuts in this plane! me in the bathroom: 😔

[–]thefudmaster 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

One does not get kicked off of a flight for saying "no thank you" to peanuts. There is definitely more to this story.

[–]SampSimps 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No, she got kicked off a flight for telling the airline that nobody else on the flight can have nuts.

[–]JoePikesbro 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even the dudes?

[–]filthydank_2099 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody move! ✂️

[–]jaspersgroove -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah I’ve been on flights where they announce they won’t serve nuts inflight and request passengers not to open their own packages if they have them due to passengers with extreme allergies, it’s not all that unusual.

If I had to guess she got kicked off the flight for causing a giant scene over what is normally a fairly mundane request.

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Though it's not just nuts, with nut allergy even the smallest amounts of nuts can cause extremely dangerous allergic réactions, and the problem is that most industrial food have traces of peanuts. Altough i agree it's on the nut allergic person to bring her own nut free food.

[–]crumpetsucker89 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The allergy is her problem, not the airlines. She can decline the nuts and wear a mask if it is that big of a deal.

[–]metalmike556 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's a self entitled cunt that feels the world needs to accommodate her. Fuck that. I'm glad she got kicked off.

[–]djp55555 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

As someone with a nut allergy, this just embarrassing.

Edit: reading some of these comments. Fuckin really with this eugenics shit? We can't help developing this shit. Unfortunately, this poor excuse for a human featured feels the need to make everyone bend to her will. For the most part, allergy sufferers make sure that they are doing their own due diligence and any risks taken are calculated ones. It's hard enough being cursed with this shit to begin with and the reputation it has, let alone being lumped in with entitled cunts like this. Stay away from the eugenics and stick to the Louis C.K. jokes, please.

[–]terryducks 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Edit: reading some of these comments. ... eugenics ...

Being a cynic ... the usual trolls and edgelords stalk many halls of discussion, just to see the world burn.

[–]PessimisticProphet 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just wear an N95...

[–]ChrisInDetroit2020 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What do you get when you allow an entire generation to think everything in the world is all about themselves, including the idea that others have to guess correctly which set of pronouns to use when addressing them?

This.

[–]apple_cheese -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Cause no older person has ever been kicked off a flight.

[–]ChrisInDetroit2020 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another Redditor aiming for the lowest common denominator!

[–]WilhelmSuperhitler 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, she is talking about the plants! When I read feminist, I thought ... nevermind

[–]TimtheToolManAsshole 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Guys if she’s a “PhD researcher” in anything but a STEM field stay far far away

[–]WolfShaman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The "article" says she is an electrical engineer.

[–]TimtheToolManAsshole 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What’s the Phd going to be in? Wouldn’t hire her to build anything

[–]WolfShaman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know, I'm just repeating what the site says.

[–]AmputatorBot 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.

Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10506915/British-woman-26-kicked-American-Airlines-flight-New-York-nut-allergy.html


I'm a bot | Why & About | Summon: u/AmputatorBot | Summoned by this good human!

[–]Xenophore 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good bot

[–]WokeUp2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sophie was Caraway'd.

[–]Different_Summer_748 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you for flying American airnuts we do hope you enjoyed gaging on our nuts

[–]terryducks 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only you can enjoy our tasty nuts.

[–]BowtiepastaMasta 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does intersectional feminist mean?

[–]Carter0108 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven’t flown in a few years but I distinctively remember there being a no nut rule. Doesn’t seem PPD, more laws being broken.

[–]krawm 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

After Ms Draper told them her severe allergy was airborne and she could suffer an adverse reaction, she alleges the employees scoffed at the idea of banning nuts from the plane.

What utter bullshit, this fucking karen got what she deserved.

[–]Spaciernight 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Allergies are weird. I have a friend who was very allergic to certain seafoods. Even if someone else at the table ordered it, you could see the hives growing on her. Pretty weird, yet, she never demanded that we choose something else.

[–]ifrankenstein 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey New York, put your nuts away....Sophie is coming to town.

[–]dp1967 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We call them the C- word, in real life.

[–]carpenter_67 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

she may be an intersectional feminist not sure what that is but shes a complete attention seeking idiot for sure

[–]coda128371 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

It’s a fucking daily mail article, the intersectional feminist thing has fuck all to do with the actual story and they literally just put it in there to get people riled up.

And no it is a problem that an airline is contractually obligated to serve a food that is a common allergen with customers having no way of flying on these airlines safely if they have severe allergies to it. Like did you even read the article and what’s specifically going on and why she’s in the RIGHT for getting upset an airline puts contracts over the safety of its fliers? It’s not like they can just not serve them they literally have to by obligation.

[–]carpenter_67 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

i just did a basic google search and found six airlines that either do not serve nuts on board or if you let them know ahead of time they will serve alternate snacks on your flight or will create a buffer zone but they all stipulated that you needed to make them aware beforehand not just show up and and expect changes be made. 1.1 percent of the population suffers from some form of nut allergy ranging from mild to severe so your and this attention seeking nuts idea of dealing with the problem is to just ignore the fact that the percentage of people who actually like the nuts being serves exceeds those with issues by several orders of magnitude and demand changes be made to suit their needs immediately. yeah that makes sense lets make 99 people suffer so the one that didnt make arrangements for an issue they knew they had beforehand can be comfortable .

[–]coda128371 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Dude did you even read the article this entire conversation is about? AA is CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED to serve them REGARDLESS of flier notice of allergies.

Holy shit at least read what this entire thing is about. God the people on this sub have the IQ of a rock

[–]carpenter_67 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

dude are you missing the point she had other choices but she chose to do this for attention! and yes i did read the article and then did a little research before commenting did you? in fact british airways is one of the airlines that doesnt serve nuts at all allthough they do not gaurantee trace amounts are not in some of the foods they serve and how could they gaurantee that they advise if your issue is severe bring your own snacks .

[–]coda128371 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I’d say bringing attention to a potentially dangerous airline policy is a good thing. They’re fucking nuts dude it’s such a clown thing to do to defend a snack food over peoples health. That’s so fucking cringey

EDIT: You don’t seem to understand how food manufacturing works because no one can guarantee something isn’t free from trace allergens. That’s not the issue here.

[–]carpenter_67 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

whats cringey is expecting the world to to revolve around you.

[–]coda128371 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This has nothing to do with me. Literally what are you even talking about ?? Lmfao I don’t even have allergies to any sort of food but she’s right. It literally changes nothing if an airline chooses to serve a snack other than nuts if a fellow flier requests them to. Way to move goalposts though.

[–]carpenter_67 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

i wasnt referencing you personally i was staying with the original point which was her expectation of everyone bowing to her specific need but way to move the goalposts though.

[–]coda128371 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You have to be a child to think your argument is a good one. I’m not sure you even know what goalpost means.

[–]iamatwork24 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Actually it’s not that common. Nut allergies effect 1.1% of the global population.

[–]coda128371 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That’s still about 3 million people. Do you understand how percentages work ? And no it is listed as one of the 8 common allergens as in out of all allergies it’s one of the most common one to have. Also even studies call it a significant health concern because 3+ million people isn’t a small amount. Other airlines sure don’t seem to have a problem switching out the snacks on board when fliers give them notice.

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/common-food-allergies

[–]iamatwork24 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I very much understand how percentages work. The US has a population of 329.5 million. So 3 million may seem like a big number as a standalone value, but it seems you’re the one who doesn’t understand percentages, that’s only 1% of the US population. So it is a small amount of the population, that’s how percentages work. 99% unaffected, 1% affected, how is that not clear? So if you are part of that 3 million, sure sounds like you should take responsibility for your own safety and as you pointed out, fly one of those other airlines that make accommodations for food allergies.

[–]coda128371 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You’re literally putting nuts above peoples health. Like this is such an asinine conversation that people are literally defending nuts over doing the minimum that at least a dozen other major airlines do of just not serving nuts and instead serving other things. They’re nuts dude. Also in what stats class did you take that convinced you 3,000,000 people isn’t that big of a number.

[–]iamatwork24 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

When compared to 329.5 million, 3 million is a small number. How is that hard to understand? What stats class did you take that 1% is a big percentage? If no airlines made accommodations, I’d thinks it’s an issue. But as you’ve pointed out, a whole bunch of airlines do make accommodations. So I don’t really see the issue, plenty of choices for those affected.

[–]coda128371 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You seem to struggle with numbers, my guy. 3 is a small number. 3 million is not. Do you understand how big of a magnitude that “million” is and sometimes even multiple millions? I’m sure I can find you a childrens book that talks about it if you need help conceptualizing it. There’s also no way of knowing if any other airlines were even making the flight she needed.

[–]iamatwork24 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How can you be so condescending yet so wrong? Yes, 3 million is a huge number. But when 3 million is 1% of something, it is small. Like you’re being intentionally obtuse. When you compare 3 million to 329.5 million, 3 million is small. Or let’s break it down a bit so maybe you can understand better. If you had $329.50 in your pocket and something cost $3.30, would you call that a big expense? I don’t even care about the nut thing, I’m just blown away by your lack of understanding of percentages while at the same time being condescending about your misunderstanding

[–]w1r3dh4ck3r 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because of course she is.

[–]Re-toast 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course she does

[–]Derp800 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone remember that Louis CK bit called "Of course, but maybe?" Well, this is a definite maybe.

[–]Jamifan 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don’t touch the nuts then!

[–]5269636b417374 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Gervais did it already

[–]jesus_chen 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He needs to get on her next flight!

[–]_eXo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder when will the boyfriend be allowed to say his side of the story

[–]zinny08 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Charter a plane, bitch.

[–]catsdontsmile 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They did what she asked: got the nut out of the flight

[–]langstonspewz 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course she is

[–]Fisheatin 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should buy her own plane.

[–]Frenchie81 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can someone with a severe nut allergy explain the way in which you can get severe reactions outside of ingestion. Can you get a severe reaction from skin contact or breathing in airborne nut protein? Maybe touching a nut then rubbing your eyes? I'm just curious because if that's the case, I'd be pretty terrified myself to be in an enclosed space with the potential for 4 hours or more. Do you always carry an epi-pen?

[–]Fuming-Nitric-Acid 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgrace to my country

[–]technobrendo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She lives at the intersection of loco and crazy

[–]O_fiddle_stix 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Self admitted shitty person.

[–]dmckidd 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Keep her in the UK. We don’t want her type.

[–]emax4 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"M'am, this is an Intersectional Feminist-free flight, so you can't fly with us today."

[–]stiffgordons 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wear a mask. They work, right?

[–]peterrocks9 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Person with severe peanut allergy here: certain airlines (Delta, Jet Blue, British Airways) will avoid serving nuts / make statements to passengers to not eat nuts on the flight if you have an allergy registered prior to arrival. They also let you pre-board to clean surfaces from possible contaminants. Let’s not try to tie people with disabilities (allergies are disabilities under the ADA) to others’ political stances / worldviews. Now that all said, American is not one of the airlines that will cater to this requirement, so she should not have that expectation.

[–]918173882 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This. Many people on here downplay nut allergy.

[–]peterrocks9 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There’s also this generally expressed perspective of “if you have an allergy then just don’t live” that completely lacks compassion or basic decency. Not having a specific type of snack for a small period of time is a minor inconvenience to allow others to travel safely (and prevent emergency landings messing up everyone’s plans). To me, it sounds exactly the same as people refusing to wear a mask during the height of the pandemic and saying “i’m not immunocompromised so those who are can die and go to hell.”

[–]918173882 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]Christop_McC 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m as allergic to nuts as the next nut allergy guy but this is stupid af I literally put my finger in a peanut butter jar and give it to my dog it’s no big deal just ya know don’t eat it? Let other people do what they want

[–]Soft_Leather_Couch 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can’t wait for the typical response when this happens.

“ShE dId SoMeThInG wRoNg? ShE’s NoT a ReAl FeMiNiSt.”

I mean she’s only been a “not real feminist” for 2 decades, is a vital member of some large feminist organisations and led marches,speeches and helped make a policy that’s now law, but apparently all her toxic teaching and toxic vitriol that she introduced is washed away after repeating that quote.

[–]FreeMan4096 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

democrats would like to find some high ranking position for her.

[–]zapdude0 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You know damn well the boyfriend in that photo is the most whipped soyboy to walk the earth

[–]TZ879 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She definitely wears the strap-on in their relationship!

[–]MuertaDeLS -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Come to NY. Hold the beer.

[–]SnooPickles1731 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Yeah fuck her. I always take nuts with me when I fly, simply because it is too expensive to buy when I fly locally, and to have something to snack on between meals on international flights. No way am I giving up my nuts or having them confiscated cause of some entitled bitch.

[–]918173882 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Well here she is wrong but IF nut allergy could actually be airborn you shouldnt take it as it would kill her, even the slightest amount, and of a not so pleasant death (suffocation as the throat swells, blocking respiration)

[–]GulchDale 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a 'them' problem and not a 'me' problem.

[–]918173882 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Killing people is the problem of the person you kill?

[–]chakan2 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If you have a nut allergy, leave. Expecting the rest of the world to revolve around your nut allergy is going to get you killed.

[–]918173882 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Man. No. That's stupid, you gotta keep people alive even if touches to your slight comfort. Do you value your Snickers candy bar more than a human life?

[–]chakan2 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you value your Snickers candy bar more than a human life?

If it's someone dumb enough to walk up to me when I'm eating a snickers with a life threatening allergy to snickers...Yea, I value my snickers more than their life.

The real question...do we value ALL snickers more than one person's inconvenience? Yes...yes we collectively do.

[–]918173882 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well yeah, death is pretty inconvenient. Seriously, peanut allergy is no joke, it's not a reason to say "duuh, they can go die cuz muh wont stop etin sniker for 3 minut!!!11!!"

[–]chakan2 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah, death is pretty inconvenient.

Not really, that means more Snickers for me.

[–]Transpatials -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh no...

Anyway.

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Killing people is cool?

[–]Transpatials 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it? Kind of weird of you to say, but okay.

[–]3utterFingers 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I can't take articles on dailymail seriously. Especially the ones that hit all the click-baity trigger points like this.

[–]reddituseranyonymous -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You shouldn't. They're the worst paper in the world. Like Fox News for the barely literate

[–]3utterFingers -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a website that makes up stories and people lap it up, they can piss right off.

[–]reddituseranyonymous -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm they must be out of the newspaper business then because last time I was in England they had an actual newspaper.

[–]Sillygoat2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why doesn’t she just wear her mask. Surely if it’s going to save us from a virus it can save her from nut dust. Edit: /s obviously. We all know masks don’t save us from viri

[–]GeneralToaster -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Before your edit I thought you were dumb, but afterwards you removed all doubt.

[–]dangerzonebjj 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't what a pussy pass means. This sub reddit is a mess

[–]killer8424 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What do you want to be her mouth gets itchy when she eats nuts and that’s it.

[–]918173882 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Her face becomes red and swell her throat tightens and her respiratory system blocks suffocating her when she eats nuts and that's it*

Nut allergy is serious man, dont downplay it it's one of the most dangerous allergies.

[–]killer8424 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but people like this definitely are the type to claim bogus shit like “gluten sensitivity” when they don’t actually have anything like that

[+]chippedbeefontoast -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was on a nut free flight once. I figured it was common.

[–]PBR--Streetgang 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well she wanted the plane to be nut free, and once they kicked her off it was, lol.

[–]Buffbigw76 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao. Just look at that Beta she’s with, because I guarantee you he is no Alpha.

[–]TBbtk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WTF does intersectional feminist even mean?

[–]TheHeroYouKneed 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is not a 'pussy pass'. It's just a highly self-entitled woman complaining and expecting the world to pay her more attention than it does anyone else. She didn't try to have nuts banned from the flight because she has no X chromosome.

This is nothing but self-entitlement. That's not what this sub is about. This isn't supposed to be 'Durr wimmyn arr the stoopid' and treating it that way reduces the value while giving critics more ammunition to have this slash-r shut down as a 'hate sub'.

[–]TheHeroYouKneed 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Why isn't she carrying her EpiPen? This isn't her first flight because had it been, that information would have been included.

Airlines have long tested this and found that restriction only within three rows fore and aft of anyone with such a truly and life-threateningly severe allergy is sufficient for protection in the absolute worst of cases.

Of course, let us not forget this appears in the Daily Hate Mail whose core operational raison d'etre is outrage, hence the mention of the wholly unrelated 'intersectionalist feminist' description of this narcissist.

How is this a 'pussy pass'? Sure she's a narcissist, but she's not making her demands simply because she has tits.

[+]TinnieTa21 -18 points-17 points-16 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Okay, using the term "intersectional feminist' is absolutely cringe-worthy, but I do empathize with her regarding the peanut allergy. It seems pretty harsh to not consider the health of a passenger especially on a long flight like that.

Right?... But again, maybe the entire story of what actually happened isn't being told.

[–]SonOfUncleSam 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The airline absolutely can't control if someone brought their own nuts onto the plane. Accepting that liability would be a legal nightmare.

[–]ScottyINeedMorePower 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not to mention, nut-products like peanut oil, as someone mentioned above. How are they going to regulate that? Someone could rub nut oil on their pants and kill the next peanut allergy person that sits in the chair.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+]TinnieTa21 -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

True. It just sucks I guess. I would have asked the people nicely at the first least if it was okay for them not to open their nuts lol.

[–]ATXthedude 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What about any passengers that flew on that plane before she boarded, who might have had nuts themselves? Maybe someone might have dropped one in between a seat that the cleaning crew might have missed?

[–]ayoungad 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If being in the presence of a nut will kill you, then maybe you shouldn’t be flying…or in public. I get it, peanut allergies suck. But your allergies should get to decide my diet.

[–]JoePikesbro 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm allergic to peanuts and trust me, if someone 10 aisles away from me is eating peanuts it is not going to affect me in any way. She's just an entitled cunt who thinks the world should revolve around her.

[–]ScottyINeedMorePower 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Her poor boyfriend is likely only enabling her entitled behavior. This is the type of behavior weak man-children produce in their partners when they don't stand up to their bullshit out of fear that they will be abandoned for speaking up.

[–]k0unitX 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

out of fear that they will be abandoned for speaking up.

To be fair, they probably would.

[–]LegacyToaster 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea it's the man's fault! Women are never responsible for their shitty behavior amiright guys

[–]918173882 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Altough she was making it a little too luch, nut allergy isnt triggered by airborne sources, only by eating stuff

[–]ogrelin 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off commie

[–]Freefall84 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How do you propose the airline stops people having nuts on the flight? I assume you have a plan to prevent any possible contamination because the second the airline says the flight will be nut free, then they are legally obliged to ensure the flight is nut free.

[–]Adomval 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This trend of kids expecting the world to adapt to their necessities is the dumbest shit of this piece of shit decade so far. And we’ve had to deal with a global pandemic…

[+]CMUpewpewpew -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Once again...this sub is not able to discern what a denied pussy pass is.

[–]Notagoodguy80 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Serious question, is it possible for an allergy to get that sensitive and serious?

Also, not a shocker that she identifies as intersectional feminist lookin at the milquetoast beta hipster male feminist standing next to her. I bet he thanks her for cheating on him

edit; another serious question, with the constant correlation of wokesters and feminists constantly doubling down on their bullshit, and basically being the very toxic white wealthy Karens that they whine about, Has there been any SIGNIFICANT examples of feminists/leftists ACTUALLY admitting theyre wrong or apologizing for some infraction? Because the amount that these people think they are constantly walking around life being right all the time is statistically impossible

[–]Darkn355Fa115 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, at least she can claim that her boyfriend was also unable to fly, even if it was just if he wanted to fly with her, so equality was achieved that day…still she remains upset about it.

[–]Pierogchen 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope she's gonna spare the world from her children.

[–]1800dope 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shocking to no one...

[–]F33dR 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

directed by robert b weide

[–]undoobitably 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The nutty feminist

[–]V3N0M3 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would nut in the flight just to piss her off.

[–]Stev_582 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As someone with a life threatening peanut allergy, I can assure you we are not all like this.

That being said, mine may be less severe than hers. I can sit next to someone eating peanuts and not die.

[–]Adomval 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf is an intersectional feminist? Oh wait nvm I could not care less.

[–]OptiGuy4u 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't even see why this is an issue. I was recently on a flight from Atlanta to Amsterdam and overheard there was a passenger with a nut allergy and they removed all the peanuts from the plane before we took off.

Maybe delta takes it more seriously but I thought it was probably standard for airlines.

I don't care, I mean I like peanuts but if they could kill me I'd prefer to not have them around. I can eat a different snack if it puts someone at least risk. It's just a peanut.

[–]Throwawayacc7262 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No nut November should be her best month, for sure.

[–]takosuwuvsyou 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, I'd want a place to be free of an allergen that could kill me, if I'm going to be stuck in a metal cylinder with no hospitals I can be brought to.

[+]Rob__T -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Like, on the one hand, yes, pussu pass denied is nice. On the other, I can't say I like that the attendants were like "Oh First Class must get their nuts." Like, sorry, but no. I don't care what class you're on, you can be told "Sorry, someone has a nut allergy on board and we can't serve these this flight." There should absolutely be a policy in place where someone can report an allergy and the foods in question taken off the snack list.

[–]eat_like_snake 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My friend has a deadly nut allergy, and sitting next to him eating them is not going to cause him to go into anaphylactic shock.
This isn't how nut allergies work.

Additionally, if you somehow DO have an allergy that bad (and rare), the burden goes to you protecting yourself from those triggers, not the 99.999% who don't have this problem.

[–]Rob__T -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I hardly call "Hey you need to not eat this specific type of snack on this particular flight" a burden. There are people who have severe reactions to having been in the vicinity of the food they are allergic to, picking one data point really isn't reasonable nor correct. You can't tell people "Sorry you can't fly because we serve nuts on the plane." That's an absurd standard to set.

[–]GeneralToaster 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You have everything backwards. It's absurd to have an airline and an entire plane full of people conform to your needs. Take some personal responsibility.

[–]Rob__T -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...If we were talking "Can't make noise" or "Can't eat literally anything", yeah sure. "Hey, no nuts please" is far from unreasonable. It's really entitled to say "People who have certain needs that are the mildest of inconveniences for others should have to make ridiculous arrangements so as not to tell others they have to go without a nut based snack for a couple hourse"

[–]catsdontsmile 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you have an airborne nut allergy?

Non-ingestion contact, from touching nuts or inhaling airborne allergens (dust), is very unlikely to trigger a severe reaction.

Sep 25, 2020

https://www.wsh.nhs.uk/CMS-Documents/Patient-leaflets/PaediatricDepartment/6438-1-Nut-allergy.pdf

[–]sportingpineapple -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m sorry but what does her status as an “intersectional feminist” have to do with the story? She didn’t reference that as the reason the plane had to be nut free, did she?

[–]truthseeeker -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is isn't a PPD since being kicked off the plane had nothing to do with her gender. I'm not a huge fan of feminism and don't even know what intersectionality is, but this post is just a setup for hateful comments.

[–]GrandpaShark710 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure I know what, exactly an intersectional feminist is. Looks like a moonbat harpie to me.

[–]Xenophore -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/u/AmputatorBot

[–]spammmmmmmmy -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand the issue here. I've been on American flights where they wouldn't serve peanuts because there was one baby on board. I didn't understand the logic then and was an unhappy customer... but the world didn't end and more importantly, it is apparently fairly common practice. So why does this warrant a news story?

Oh. Daily Mail.

[–]ZippyTheChicken -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lady you ain't taking my nuts 🥜🔨🐔

[–]Chemical_Custard6365 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Id give her some nuts alright.

[–]WeranioRacker -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Huh?

[–]Thissssguy -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The plane was always going to have nuts because of Deez.

[–]MrSnrlub -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like every other day, just don't eat the nuts maybe?

[–]918173882 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Altough nut allergy is serious, the danger isnt directly in nuts but mainly if there is a little residues of nuts (wich there almost always is in industrial products) it can cause severe allergic réactions, wich can be fatal even in the smallest amounts. Altough yes the airplane shouldnt have to accomodate people with allergies, it should be them who bring their own nut free stuff, the only adaptation form the airplane should be to have the medicine nescesary to avoid death if there is an allergic reaction.

[–]coda128371 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you not understand what liability is? Because this is a huge one. There’s a reason probably most other airlines do not serve this type of snack if they’re made aware of an allergy. It’s so the fliers that are under their supervision in that moment don’t die because of their actions and so they don’t have to land or delay takeoff because a flier has to leave due to their contractual obligation to serve this food.

[–]GeneralToaster 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I fly often, what other airlines might those be?

[–]coda128371 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Southwest, Jet Blue, Delta, United, Air Canada, Swiss Airlines, British Airways, I could go on.

Was googling too hard?

[–]BergenCountyJC -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should have flown in November if she wanted the plane to be nut free

[–]pugmommy4life420 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Takes a nut to know one!

[–]mikehouse72 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mail her nuts you won't

[–]singularity48 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But, I ate a pineapple before the flight!

[–]deeznutz1970 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course she does.

[–]dzyrider -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn man, so like, what can she do about this? Lmao just not travel? Seems like a shitty thing to be severely allergic to.

[–]-DoW- -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Had a uni friend die unexpectedly from a nut allergy. It's no joke.

[–]-Mavs -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck is an "intersectional" feminist?

[–]bitemio -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some airlines accommodate nut allergies by serving pretzels instead of nuts. This sounds fake

[–]mr_featherbottom -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ugh

[–]RandomHuman2354 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does but free even mean?

[–]Xadithy -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I LOVE BRITS omg

[–]bivenator -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean peanut allergies are definitely a thing but this bitch seems to be doing it more for attention than anything else.

[–]Vast-Silver -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When i fly i want my nuts in a bag, not flying as a passenger.

[–]countricola -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On my next flight, i demand the plane to be "intersectional feminist" free. Better yet, feminist free.

[–]puttinthe-oo-incool -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

bitch should just take her broom. That way everyone can be happy.

[–]Yusi-D-Jordan -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She seems pretty nutty

[–]Cookiecan10 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She looks a bit like that girl from Doctor Who

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter