N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD

2025-05-31T16:30:17+00:00

Every red pill man here knows he'd be a "betabux" for a high n count woman if only he had the opportunity 🤣🤣🤣

Y'all are just mad women are capable of getting some, most men would prefer a low n count woman so she'd have nothing to compare his terrible skills in the bedroom too 🤣

Just cause you can't bring a woman to orgasm you don't want to risk that she's been with someone who can! 🤣 bunch of insecure and retro actively jealous babies 🤣

ViolentShallot · 2025-05-31T08:51:37+00:00

[permanently deleted]

salphon · 2025-05-30T15:43:36+00:00

Still haven’t seen a single research paper from anyone claiming that a high n-count is good or doesn’t matter. You’ve got nothing. Every single thread is the same. This isn’t a debate forum, it’s just shit.

I’m genuinely disappointed.

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/xqbfyi/not_only_is_past_promiscuity_a_good_predictor_of/

https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408

On a rating scale of −3 (extremely undesirable) to +3 (extremely desirable), men rated the quality “faithful” +2.88 and “sexually loyal” +2.85; these were the two most highly valued qualities in a long-term mate out of 67 qualities evaluated (Buss & Schmitt 1993). On the other end of the scale, men rated “unfaithful” −2.93 and “sleeps around a lot” −2.79; these were the two most undesirable qualities in a prospective long-term mate. Men apparently assess and evaluate levels of sexual activity by a woman prior to long-term commitment—behavior that would have been observable or known through social reputation in the small-group lifestyles of our ancestors. Past behavior is a good predictor of future behavior, and having a large number of sex partners prior to marriage is a statistical predictor of infidelity after marriage (Buss 2016).

Spicycloth · 2025-05-30T03:07:34+00:00

does medium n count exist?

id imagine its like,
3 or less is low n count,
8 and above is high n count,
and then 4-7 is just M O D E R A T E 🗿

ThatBitchA · 2025-05-29T19:18:42+00:00

So what number is considered high?

I believe the average is something like <7.

I'm 20+ based on a quick estimate.

I had a lot of sex so my version of high is probably 75+.

Depending on the person, I'm either impressed or turned off. Lol.

RegularTime7314 · 2025-05-28T21:52:23+00:00

How important is the time dimension?

A female friend confided in me that she attends sex parties/orgies Saturdays, and then goes on dates on Sundays. But that as soon as she finds someone to be exclusive with she would stop.

It got me thinking, how far in the past does it have to be to be considered 'in the past'?

Cultural-Ad-8486 · 2025-05-28T18:44:59+00:00

It's funny how many women here are in denial trying to articulate that they are not two-faced when they literally divide men into classes and dehumanize them.

And even more so trying to justify their unwillingness to have sex with "husband material". Like gods, if you are asexual or you are not interested in LTRs then say so and own your shit. Just respect yourself

The only funny thing is that they are trying to make it seem like since they don't enter into relationships with fuckboys, it means it's the standard and they are so important that everyone does it and fuckboys are so "pathetic".

Girls, I have to disappoint you, but it is unlikely that the day will ever come when fuckboys will not have a pussy to fuck and dozens of girls wanting a relationship

ThatBitchA · 2025-05-28T17:11:50+00:00

It's weird the obsession with getting the same experience as another man a woman slept with.

Some folks here make sex sound like some step by step process that is the exact same with everyone.

If you don't want to wait for sex, don't.

But someone doesn't owe you sex immediately because they had sex immediately with someone else.

washington_breadstix · 2025-05-28T09:24:42+00:00

Disclaimer: I don't really have skin in the game here. I don't view promiscuity as an inherently good or bad thing.

However, a few weeks ago, there was a thread where women were asked why they don't want to date bi-sexual men. A bunch of the most popular responses were basically "It just turns me off to imagine my partner getting fucked by men".

Isn't this practically identical to the male aversion to sluts? Why aren't these women considered "insecure" for dismissing certain men as partners solely for something that happened in the past with other men?

Cultural-Ad-8486 · 2025-05-28T08:48:27+00:00

I suspect that the reason why guys here are afraid of settling down is simple. And it's the same reason why they don't believe women who say that they like their husbands even after the "hoe phase" in the past.

And it's all simple and because, unfortunately, women's words and actions are very different.

An example is when a woman makes a guy "husband material" wait for sex, while the fuckboys from her past did not have to do this.

And she can tell "husband material" as much as she wants that she truly loves him, it's all about the connection between them, she wants him sexually, etc. But words are nothing against actions and she does not show with her actions that she wants to fuck him.

That's the whole solution. Women just need to really fuck their husbands and show that they love them, instead of empty words. Then women with a high n-count would not have a bad reputation in the first place and there would be no shame for whores.

And before any women come along and say that men also need to show their wives that they love them and desire them sexually... I AGREE.

But as long as women justify their lack of attraction to their husbands with "Responsive Attraction", things won't go in the right direction.

Motor-Buy-6991 · 2025-05-28T07:17:17+00:00

Any guy in his mid 20s that cares about body count just needs to give it up. There’s nothing but disappointment for you. The only low body count women at this age are religious and married. And no I don’t care about what any of the old fucks in this sub have to say. In your prime dating years flip phones barely existed.

jay303x · 2025-05-27T04:31:09+00:00

Every other week, it's comments from women about how jealous they are that men have all the high-paying careers.

It all boils down to jealousy and insecurities.

ThatBitchA · 2025-05-26T16:15:02+00:00

Every other week, it's comments from men about how jealous they are that women are having sex while single.

It all boils down to jealousy and insecurities.

StupidWhiteBoi · 2025-05-25T19:29:27+00:00

BLUF: Promiscuous people are selfish, deceitful, dishonest, and are manipulative.

Apart from the obvious increased STI / STD risk, there are some other concerns a physician might have:

Increased cancer risk in individuals with 10 or more lifetime partners, with women in particular showing a 91% increase in cancer diagnosis - https://srh.bmj.com/content/46/2/100
Decreased cardiovascular health (counterintuitive I know, and the study wasn’t super conclusive but still worth noting) - https://nature.com/articles/s41598-024-83414-3
Increased risk of limiting long-standing illness, with women (again in particular) showing a 64% increase in risk - https://contemporaryobgyn.net/view/high-number-sexual-partners-increases-risk-chronic-disease

The main thing that a physician might do knowing someone has had 6 or more partners, regardless of their gender, is increase cancer screening and STI screening protocols.

People may present to medics with non-specific symptoms. Determining the cause involves differential diagnosis, part of which may involve sexual history.

If resources were infinite, we could run every possible test on every single patient every single time they visit the doctor. Since resources aren't infinite, lifestyle questionnaires help doctors assign probability to various conditions, allowing more efficient and effective allocation of resources.

If a man visits the doctor with fever, it's possible that he's caught rare tropical disease X, which can be diagnosed by slow, expensive test Y, but if the man doesn't have a recent travel history to regions where tropical disease X is endemic, then that test will probably be a waste of time and the doctor should instead focus on more likely causes.

"Body count doesn’t say anything" Sorry that's just not true. There's no evidence to back that statement up. Risk profile is just that, risk, not certainty.

Here is a true analogy that might help.

Most cases of lung cancer occur in non-smokers. Most smokers never develop lung cancer. Nonetheless, smoking is the single biggest risk factor for developing lung cancer.

It's not about ruling things out, it's about assigning likelihood, probability, etc. Most lung cancers happen in non-smokers but if something is up with your chest, your doctor will still ask if you smoke.

Jenks natural breaks. Risk for HPV and other STDs rises significantly above 6 partners. It's useful to be able to categorise people into 3 groups, low risk, medium risk, high risk. Six is somewhat arbitrary but if you're establishing categories, you have to draw a line somewhere

It’s funny to see this obvious answer break people’s brains. They are so emotionally committed to the idea of absolute sexual liberation, that someone saying, “having tons of sex with randos correlates with disease” prompts them to say things like, “yeah, well it’s a stupid question because it’s not a 100% correlation.”

Yes, an emotional or political commitment to sexual liberalism seems to encourage people to completely discount the existence of negative consequences.

Medical history isn't a confessional, but some things matter. They ask because bodies remember, risks stack, past choices shape future care. It isn't judgment, it's preparation. Health isn't just today, it's a record of everything before. Transparency saves lives.

Cultural-Ad-8486 · 2025-05-25T15:57:27+00:00

Why is it so hard for some slutty people here to understand that n-count is a direct reflection of a person's views on sex?

Like, it's quite obvious that if a man or woman has a high n-count, then they calmly perceive sex not as a special act with a partner, but as just a physical act. And yes, even if you deny it and say that "With a special person it will be special in its own way"... NO, it won't.

This is something that literally concerns all life actions that are tied to emotions. Let's say I've jumped with a parachute a dozen times before and my emotions about it have calmed down and I'm more cool about it despite the fact that I still feel the extremeness of what is happening. And if I, for example, go to a pair jump with someone I know, will I start to experience new emotions from this? Yes! Will these emotions be as intense as from my first solo jump? NEVER.

The mechanics here are the same and it’s hard for me to understand those who deny it.

nineworldseries · 2025-05-25T14:35:38+00:00

High n count man (95 at age 46). The least attractive thing to me is a virgin or inexperienced woman. Why in the world would I want a woman who has no clue what she's doing, is probably uptight and anxious about it, and had no experience to bring to the table? Other that that, I don't care. I find the obsession with low n count women to be exceedingly odd, counterintuitive, and indicative of no real sexual experience.

jay303x · 2025-05-25T13:02:47+00:00

High n women: fun times material

Low n women: wife material

Get it? Got it? Good.

Logos1789 · 2025-05-25T07:23:15+00:00

I don’t subscribe to this line of thought, but many of the people who assert that N count doesn’t matter do.

So I’m curious:

If men who care about N count are so wrong and are presumably unappealing to you…then why even bother to argue about N count?

Why not just ignore those men, allow others who come to agree with them to tag along, and you focus on the men who agree with you, instead?

ReasonConfident4541 · 2025-05-25T05:50:15+00:00

I would prefer someone with a string of ONS than someone who has a string of 2-3 month long relationships.

So if their count is 6 but that's because once a year they have a 2 month long relationship I think that tells you a lot more about what you're getting into, if their count is 50 but they've been able to maintain a 5 year long relationship and only had ONS's either side of it I think it would probably work better long term.

The success of a relationship is determined more by day to day behaviour inside of one, as opposed to what they do when they are single and have the freedom to do what they please. If you're reaching thirty and your potential SO has not been able to maintain any kind of long term relationship then maybe there is a reason for that, a high count can just mean they enjoy themselves on a night out when they have the freedom to fuck around.

The whole body count being an issue just comes across as fear of being cheated on or fear that you're inadequate compared to past lovers, which is very pathetic. Very early on I told my wife if she cheated then I'm walking away, we have 2 kids, we've been together for 13 years and to this day she is well aware that I could live my life without her if I needed to and I know the same goes for her because we're not co-dependant, we have a healthy relationship with boundaries and understanding. We both know that should we need to, we could take care of ourselves and our children, it would be difficult, it wouldn't be fun, but ultimately we'd both be okay.

Operating a relationship with fear of abandonment or jealousy is unhealthy and will lead to the eventual end of your relationship.

SherbertDense1415 · 2025-05-25T04:25:26+00:00

Women have types so if she fucked with guys radically different than you, then youre being settled for.

DoctorButtocks · 2025-05-24T19:41:30+00:00

Has anyone made an earnest inquiry into their partners n count? Like actually pressed them for a straight answer?

Super-Ad-8731 · 2025-05-24T18:51:37+00:00

women: "i prefer guys to approach me, although i wont do the same"

women: "i prefer guys to pay for the whole first date, although i wont do the same"

women: "i prefer guys to be leaders and to take the lead, although i wont do the same"

women: "i prefer guys to be confident and charismatic, even though i'm not one myself"

women: "i prefer guys to be extroverted and outgoing, even though i'm not one myself"

women: "i prefer guys to be rich, even though i'm not rich myself"

men: "i prefer low n/virgin women, even though i'm not a low n/virgin myself"

legbeards: "you cant do that! that's hypocritical!"

guys, have your low n/virgin preferences. dont let any flabby feminists try to convince you otherwise. in fact, i encourage you to have as many hypocritical standards as you can, women sure as hell do.

YuYuHakusho23 · 2025-05-24T18:45:21+00:00

I think high n count is a reflection of one’s character and show’s they actively engage in risky behavior CMV

Bitch_King-of_Angmar · 2025-05-24T18:07:10+00:00

im the first

upvote says = "im a proud slut"

comment says = "im normal stop looking at me"

downvote says = "i never had sex yet"

AutoModerator · 2025-05-24T16:00:35+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "Debate" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Title	N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD
Author	AutoModerator
Upvotes	4
Comments	463
Date	May 24, 2025 4:00 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1kuezdw/n_counts_weekly_discussion_thread/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/n-counts-weekly-discussion-thread.1553137 https://theredarchive.com/post/1553137

Comments