I personally am against it.

I forgot where I got this paragraph from sorry but it was in an article by a gay man.

"Surrogacy carries serious risks to the women. It is those on lower incomes, and not the wealthy, who are allowing the rich to rent their wombs. Babies born of surrogacy are also at higher risk of poor health outcomes. Most importantly, unlike a kidney, or a liver section, babies are human beings with rights and needs. Is it really likely that a baby will be emotionally unaffected by being immediately and permanently removed from her mother at birth and handed over to others? Is that what normally happens to mammals when we are born? Has nature prepared us to expect the warmth, love and care of our mothers to be immediately withdrawn when we are at our most vulnerable and have just emerged into the world? We don’t even treat dogs like that: the Kennel Club insists that puppies should not be removed from their mothers for at least six weeks following birth. If the global consensus is to ban living organ sales, then why don’t we also ban commercial surrogacy, which is probably even more harmful?"

EDIT: Here are two other paragraphs from the same article that I had copy and pasted into a file. I still cannot find the article or file sorry. Both of these paragraphs have very good points hence why I'm adding them in.

  1. "Because it requires the renting of a female body, which includes the leftist critique of rent being an exploitation from the propertied class (the men that own the surrogate woman’s body and baby), combined with elements of commodification of women’s bodies, dehumanizing mothers to the basic function of baby holder, and also assumes elements of trafficking in human body parts via commercialization of the womb."

  2. "Is commercial surrogacy – buying babies – so different from paying someone for their kidney, though? The sale of human organs by living donors is illegal worldwide, except for in Iran: the same country that subsidises gender-reassignment as a conversion “therapy” for LGB people and that hangs people from cranes for homosexuality. There are solid grounds for prohibiting the sale of living organs. It is an unacceptable form of instrumentalisation that creates a harvesting class among those on lower incomes, who will be sacrificing their physical integrity and jeopardising their health and life under financial duress. It will be the wealthy buying liver lobes and kidneys, and the poor selling them. Not the other way round."