TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman."

Dj_Nussdog

July 10, 2015
783 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3154567/Shocking-moment-manager-New-York-restaurant-punches-female-worker-face-horrified-customers.html
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman."
Author

Dj_Nussdog

Upvotes 783
Comments 242
Date July 10, 2015 9:14 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3cs3l2/employee_escorted_off_premises_returns/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/employee-escorted-off-premises-returns-trespassing.975773
https://theredarchive.com/post/975773

Comments

[–]I_FUCK_UP_RECIPES 195 points196 points197 points 11 years ago (66 children) | Copy Link

The man later declined to press charges

Always press charges if you have the option to; the trouble is worth it to teach someone that they should not feel entitled to use violence against you.

[–]ARedthorn 96 points97 points98 points 11 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

If he'd pressed charges, he'd have a decent case for wrongful termination, too.

[–]TechnoSam_Belpois 33 points34 points35 points 11 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

The have a zero-tolerance policy, so it wouldn't fly, I don't think.

[–]gladudontknowme 95 points96 points97 points 11 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

Company policy doesn't trump federal laws about wrongful termination.

[–]Mikeavelli 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, it does. Companies can fire you for any reason so long as its not specifically prohibited. If the state doesn't have a 'you can't be fired for defending yourself in a fight' law then Panera can fire him.

Happens all the time with fast food or convinience store employees who stop a robbery, and end up getting fired because it's policy to never use violence for any reason. Here's one example.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, it does.

It depends on your definition. Nothing stops the actual physical firing, but legislation enables employees to sue for wrongful dismissal after the fact and get some possible compensation in many states.

[–]GotMyFrogHatOn 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well you're wrong.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Got another account working this one, now? Boy, you must really be butthurt.

[+]kiblick -9 points-8 points-7 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

You are incorrect. It's not a wrongful fire if the bylaws of the company state you can vee fired for such. Happens all the time. 7/11 employee kills robber and gets fired bc the contract of employment stated no employee can carry a weapon to work or use violence. It's not a wrongful fire if you violate the contract you are hired under. Employee breached employment contract.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

You are incorrect.

Yeah, no. The fact wrongful dismissal legislation even exists proves you wrong. Employers try and slip in all sorts of controlling and reaching practice into employment contracts, but they run afoul of the law all the time. If you want an example, look at the enforcement record of morality clauses in contracts or the temporal limits of non-disclosure agreements. If the employer truly had the power to put whatever the hell they wanted into a contract and it would be law, no one would ever win against them in court, but they do.

[+]kiblick -12 points-11 points-10 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Nda clauses and non compete clauses are completely different. I'll give you a very simple example. It's legal to wear a purple shirt in all of the USA, but if you work at Wal-Mart you must wear a blue one. P gets fired for wearing purple shirt. All tho legal it's not a wrongful fire. You're argument starts with a huge fallacy, you state that it's a wrongful fire in the beginning. If you are going to start with a conclusion, you must follow with the rule that states it, and then an analysis of it and the situation. It's called crac in law school although I preferred to write in the irac form. You can't say this is wrongful fire bc of nda regulations. There is no link between them. If a company has a policy that is not unreasonable like the nda you brought up for some reason the court will not find a wrongful fire. This person is not part of a protected class, not hitting someone in your building is not an unreasonable restriction on your employees rights. Source I'm a lawyer.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

I'll give you a very simple example. It's legal to wear a purple shirt in all of the USA, but if you work at Wal-Mart you must wear a blue one. P gets fired for wearing purple shirt. All tho legal it's not a wrongful fire

It's only simple because the requirement in the contract is within the basic standards for a legal firing. Not all requirements in employment contracts are and it's never been the company that determined what was acceptable and what wasn't. It's been the state.

You know that most states have a Fair Labour Standards Act or something similar and it's in that legislation that a uniform is set out as something the company can mandate for their employees, right?

[–]kiblick-5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You are incorrect. I'm done wasting my time. Have fun believing whatever you want. You are incorrect.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Repeating doesn't make it true, son. Go research labour legislation when you have some free time. You clearly need the education.

[–]kiblick-5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I have a doctorate in law you find dumbass. You can't even say anything that makes sense. Yes I'm familiar with work laws and such. The fact that you think violence while on the clock when it is not absolutely necessary is protected some how by some law you can't name only illustrates to me that you have a world view, albeit incorrect, that this guy can sue for wrongful fire. Find whatever law you are talking about. I know can't because it doesn't exist. Moreover, your Canadian, wtf do you know about usa law....more than a lawyer obviously right. Stfu and get your education moron.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I have a doctorate in law you find dumbass.

HAHAHAHAHA! Oh, jeesus, that's hilarious. In what world in your head did you think that this was something you could reasonably sell?

[–]chumia402 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What is a "find dumbass" is that a legal term? Or did he find you to be a dumbass? I should probably ask the PhD in law...

[–]kiblick0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

*fucking idiot. And it's not a phd, it's a jd; juris doctorate.

[–]chumia401 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You mad bro?

[–]kiblick-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You mock but have yet to provide one piece of evidence you are correct. Besides talking about laws that do not directly deal with, what evidence do you have. You are a fucking moron and I don't care what you think.

[–]chumia401 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

In my experience (which is only anecdotal) people with higher level of education like yourself are either really relaxed and cool or pedantic and petty. By what is see here I'm inclined to think you are one of those people that when someone calls you "Mr. Kiblick" you jump rudely to correct them and say "that's Dr. Kiblick".

Edit for clarity

[–]kiblick1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's Dr. Kiblick esq.....God!

[–]ARedthorn 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on the contract (if any). I've worked at places before that went out of their way to define the employment as "at will" and have me sign off on it- meaning that employment could be terminated by either party at any time for any (or no) reason.

Hypothetically, this lets them dodge wrongful termination for anything... anything at all... But it's still ultimately up to a judge, because he can rule that the contract was invalid as written, since termination on certain grounds are constitutionally illegal, others federally, and so on.

[–]TechnoSam_Belpois 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Interesting. That seems rather strange...

So if my company has a zero-tolerance policy for employee violence, I can fire someone for being violent on camera, and then the government can tell me that I'm not allow to fire that person?

Don't get me wrong. What happened to the guy is morally wrong. But is it legally wrong? Should it be?

[–]berrythrills 38 points39 points40 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Self Defense != violence. If the roles were reversed where the female was acting in self defense by punching the male do you think she would have been fired?

[–]Red_Tannins 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Self Defense /= violence.

But that's not how Zero Tolerance policies work.

[–]bertreapot 28 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

which is exactly why zero tolerance policies don't work. they completely ignore context. furthermore, if a female employee had maced a recently fired man attacking her, i bet you all of a sudden zero tolerance wouldn't come into play.

[–]HONEST_MEOWING_CAT 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got around it in high school in the 90's for fighting. Had a kid that was threatening to "kick my ass" for a few days. I told my dad to pick me up later after school to fight. He ripped me apart and said the only time I should hit someone is in self defense. Told me to tell the school admins about the situation.

Next day at school, I go in the office. I sit with the VP and tell him, "hey, this kid is planning on fighting me today at lunch. This is going to happen today. Now that you know about it, you need to stop it because I will fight back if he hits me"

So lunch comes around, the shit talking starts flying from him, and the crowd gathers around. Kid sucker punches me in the side of my neck of all places, and stood back laughing. So I dropped my backpack and pounded the shit out of him.

Later in the office, the same VP started to talk about zero tolerance policy for fighting. At this time my dad comes in to the office. I told my dad about the talk I had with him in the morning,

Dad sat there and quietly nodded his head, not saying anything. He broke the silence with,

"So let me get this straight. My son came in this morning, warning you about him being harmed, and you did nothing to stop it. Because of that, my son got hit, and he had to defend himself. It looks like you failed to prevent my son from getting hurt when you had more than ample time to stop it. So, do you want to send my son back to class, or do you want to be neck deep in a lawsuit for expelling my boy?"

I got to go back to class, while other kid got kicked out of school.

[–]TechnoSam_Belpois 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would sure hope so, considering how they have zero-tolerance.

But knowing how society treats women I wouldn't be surprised if she got a raise instead of being fired like the man was...

[–]gladudontknowme 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that is why there exist judges and the civil court system because corporate policy is not law.

[–]gggh0st 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This guy is incorrect on a few things. The right to legislate employment issues is reserved to the state, not the federal government.

New York is not an at will state (I think) but self defense outside of fear of dire bodily harm or death is not justified in most corporate rulebooks and anyone seeking employment would have agreed to that.

[–]redditcoruum 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The right to legislate employment issues is reserved to the state, not the federal government.

Strange... FLSA and NLRA are both federal laws enacted to address employment issues. Would you like to change your position?

[–]gggh0st 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In an at will state you can be fired at any time, with or without reason.

[–]redditcoruum 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And the laws I just presented, enacted by the federal government, can effect a reversal of an illegal termination. Which shows that your statement is false. A State law does not reign supreme, there is the pesky thing called the Supremacy Clause.

I can be fired, specifically because I am black, a woman, or christian, and an employer can point to 'at will' all they want; that does not change the fact that the termination was illegal.

[–]gggh0st -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A black woman? You're legally bulletproof.

[–]baskandpurr[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Policy" is equivalent to "shit we say we do" in legal terms. A website with a "Privacy Policy" offers no legal guarantees, its just the site claiming that they will protect your data. They can still sell your data after showing you a privacy policy. It has no consequences unless somebody sues them for damages. There is nobody checking that a company abides by its policies.

[–]mammothleafblower 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Self defense is the number 1, most basic & fundamental of ALL Human rights. Can you imagine the nightmare of living in a loony bin that required you to roll up into the fetal position & beg a violent attacker for mercy???? I would consider suing the company for violating my human rights.

[–]TechnoSam_Belpois 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with the sentiment. Strongly.

However they make you read their policy and sign it before they will hire you. So if you sign something that says if you engage in any violence for any reason you will be fired, then that's binding.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't defend yourself. I think zero tolerance policies are one of the stupidest ideas human kind has invented and they can even be dangerous in some situations.

All I'm saying is that given that they have that policy, I doubt he'd be able to convince a court that he was wrongfully terminated. Especially since he's a man.

[–]doobie_keebler -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Where is that right listed in the law?

[–]mammothleafblower 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's simple common sense. Do you wait for anyone's permission to defend yourself from a violent assailant or do you simply do it because you have the common sense not to let yourself be maimed or killed?

[–]doobie_keebler -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is common sense, but you said you would consider suing the company for "violating (your) human rights". Courts deal with laws.

[–]mammothleafblower -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here in the U.S. we can sue over anything & I'd consider suing in the hope that I could establish a precedent of common sense.

[–]matthew_lane 37 points38 points39 points 11 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Not only would I have pressed charges, I then would have sued the company for wrongful termination.

[–]Blake1288 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that'd be the right thing to do.

I'm sure the guy maybe felt bad after what happened and didn't want to push this farther. At least I hope that's how it happened. She kinda got what she deserved.

And to people who think that being taller or bigger is some huge advantage. It's really not. Smaller folks are quicker and can land more blows than the taller. I'm 6-foot-5 and my friend in the police academy always had my number in defensive tactics until the fight went to the ground and I could use my wrestling experience to gain advantage. My friend was like 5-foot-9. I outweighed him by 60-pounds.

Hell even as a varsity wrestler in high school I'd lose to the smaller people. The speed in which they can move is incredible and being a big, lumbering, fuck like I am I can't react fast enough.

I saw a lot of videos like this in the academy; however, most involving officer deaths. Size doesn't mean shit.

[–]PacoBedejo 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Hell even as a varsity wrestler in high school I'd lose to the smaller people. The speed in which they can move is incredible and being a big, lumbering, fuck like I am I can't react fast enough.

6'3" here and can confirm. Until the altercation hits the ground, height and weight are usually liabilities. Best you can do is use longer reach to grab & higher center-of-mass to topple them, then grapple & subdue them on the ground.

I punched a girl in the face in my subdivision's lifeguard-less swimming pool once. She had one of the long metal "save me" poles and was hitting a her soon-to-be-ex-boyfriend in the head with it. I got in close & popped her in the face to stop what could have been a deadly situation.

[–]Blake1288 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. People really don't understand how much damage another human can do. Size really doesn't mean anything. Shit, have you seen those psycho-raised little shit kids on those Doomsday shows? I pride myself as a decent shot but those little Navy Seal fucks can probably shoot better than me.

I saw a video once showing how someone can close in on a target with a knife from range in just seconds. Even a pool cleaner, if used correctly, can incapacitate someone.

The whole mindset of our society on use of force, like in this instance, is beyond fucked. People think that weapons can't kill easily. They think it's Hollywood. It's not. Everyone doesn't understand why police shoot to kill and not injure. One bullet probably won't take someone down either. In my opinion, the manager in this instance used appropriate force to end the conflict. Now, I probably would have tried to fend off a few more blows just to make it look good, but still. In those situations, when your adrenaline flows and you get that nearly unstoppable tunnel vision, you can't really control what happens -- despite what everyone thinks.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When I taught martial arts and self defense, one of the things I drummed into my students, repeatedly, was that the human body was fragile as hell, and while training improved your odds, it wasn't any kind of guarantee. Major blows to the head virtually always concuss, shock kills lots of people with otherwise survivable wounds, dislocated or broken limbs are pretty much debilitating, knives are fucking scary, etc.

[–]Blake1288 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. Hollywood, while I'm not pointing the finger at them, has really done modern society an injustice when it comes to how self defense and tactical combat actually work.

It's awesome to see Bruce Wayne dodge blows from goons and then knock them the fuck out in one punch. It's amazing to see bad guys get shot and go down with one bullet. But that doesn't really happen.

[–]iopq 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They are not liabilities. Wingspan is one of the most important attributes to a stand-up fighter.

[–]PacoBedejo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only when the fighters are of near-equal mass...and when there are strict rules about movement, weapons, and grappling.

Otherwise, my 6'9" wingspan on my 6'3", 300lb frame doesn't make me some sort of MMA god. Anyone 150lbs or lighter could easily knock me out if I failed to grab & subdue them.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Until the altercation hits the ground, height and weight are usually liabilities.

Not sure I necessarily agree. Reach is a huge advantage that can nullify a lot of speed. A small change in angle at your shoulder puts your hand in someone's face. I really struggled to close with taller guys in karate because they could fend me off more easily than I could close.

[–]PacoBedejo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, it's certainly not 100% liability, but the additional mass from being overall larger does have many drawbacks. This isn't just about a taller person...but a larger person.

For me, the few times I've needed to & wasn't in a swimming pool, I've closed distance, grabbed, put them on the ground, and used submissive holds to finish. I have zero desire to hurt someone, even in the heat of the moment. So, I just want to end the confrontation as quickly & safely as possible.

[–]iopq -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, no, you're completely wrong. If you look at UFC fighters, the top fighters are fairly tall for their weight classes, especially in the lighter divisions.

This is because shorter fighters are forced down into lower weight classes when they can't beat bigger opponents at the heavier weight classes.

For example, Dennis Siver is very strong and has a nasty turning back kick, but he was forced to go from 170lbs down to 155, and down to 145. He's 5'7", so now he's fighting against all the other 145 lbs fighters that are around that height.

I am 6'4" and I have a huge reach advantage in striking vs. shorter opponents, and even more of an advantage if I can knee in the clinch. But your post misses the most important thing: men of the same size are much faster and stronger than women. Any 135 lbs UFC fighter would tear Ronda Rousey a new one.

[–]Blake1288 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

There is a big difference between semi-pro and professional fighters from managers at Panera Bread.

[–]iopq -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying in PROFESSIONAL fights a woman can't beat a man of the same size, but in real life women are just as strong as men?

How do you figure? Because all the evidence in the world points to men being better fighters at every level.

[–]Blake1288 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I can say right now that any professional female MMA fighter would kick the shit out of me. I'm 6-foot-5, 240-pounds.

There are women that are stronger than me, like Nick Mangolds sister. Sure, they're rare, but it's not like they don't exist.

[–]iopq 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There is a big difference between semi-pro and professional fighters from employees at Panera Bread.

[–]Blake1288 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Err, OK? Not really sure what you're trying to get anymore...

[–]iopq 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You just said you can't use professional fighters in an argument, and you go and use professional fighters in an argument. Did you forget?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He should have, if not for himself but for the fact that its a step closer to equality for men.

[–]Blake1288 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup. What's great is DV situations where the woman or man doesn't want law enforcement to press charges after they were battered.

[–]Electroverted 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not pressing charges is such an inherent mentality for men. We all have a little white knight in us when it comes to punishing women, and it sucks.

[–]kiblick 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you but for different reasons. You press charges to make your defense of yourself more legitimate.

[–]babno 115 points116 points117 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

the woman was trying to quit her job

much earlier when the woman was thrown out of the restaurant

Defending the vaginas at any cost.

[–]jetlife_throwaway 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The article goes on to state that police found the man was acting in self defense.

[–]marsbat14 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Reportedly" acting in self defence. Because those big mean cops will do anything to protect other men.

[–]youdonotnome 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The title and context of the entire article is infuriating. The author doesn't even mention the first slap and grossly exaggerates the woman's innocence.

Trying to quit her job? That's how you try to quit? White kniting hack

[–]BioGenx2b 44 points45 points46 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Panera has a zero-tolerance policy. So if someone attacks an employee, they're supposed to do what? Curl up into a ball and wait for the police? Shit, their food was already too expensive anyway.

[–]Chameleon4242 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

I've worked at places where I was told to do exactly that. Given the option of keeping the job and taking a beating or defending myself from injury, the job would lose every time.

[–]TheJollySatan 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In australia our Occ health and saftey laws would destroy on a company that forced you to take beating the minute there is ANY liability. If you are injured due to following your companies process they are fucked as it is their responsibility to provide a safe working environment. If you took the beating you could take your employer to the cleaners if you could prove corp policy encouraged such in action.

[–]JohnGalt316 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

exactly

sue corporation for having an "unsafe work environment"

[–]BioGenx2b 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Seriously. Take a beating, go to the hospital, come to work the next day with pain and a swollen face, lose your job in a week anyway. Fuck that shit, hire a security guard if "no fighting" is an issue for you.

[–]jtaylor73003 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Actually under OSHA and disability laws, if you got hurt on the job by violence then they are required to pay for all you medical bills and not allowed to fire you for it. If you prove that they fired you for being injured on the job it is same as discrimination, and you file with the EEOC as normal and sue. FYI many workman comp lawyers are pro bono since usually the company ends up paying them.

[–]BioGenx2b 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, workman's comp, but there are limits (and you're dealing with insurance companies ultimately), and they can still try to fire you for being late or poor performance.

Alternate Title: Loopholes and Lawyers Who Love Them

Also, the risk is still way too fucking high. You have no idea what the assailant will throw at you, how they will attack you. It might be mild, it might be brutal. IMO only crazy people attack their co-workers, especially at work.

[–]jtaylor73003 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

late??? Under workman's comp the company has to pay for all doctor's visit, usually by having you clock in to go to them, and has to pay or provide travel. A lawyer explains this.

Poor Performance?? This one is tricky, but under Americans with Disabilities Act, a company must provide reasonable accodamation to any person disable to perform their job. A work place injury is a temporary to perament disability. The Company is pretty shady if they used poor performance as an excuse against a disable person, especially one injured on the job. Plus opening up to be a civil lawsuit and possible federal charges.

You are right that co-worker would be crazy to attack you at work, and you life is in danger. I just saying that it isn't crazy to take the beating, and you can't just be fired in a week.

[–]BioGenx2b 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Right, they have to pay for doctor's visits, but that doesn't mean they have to excuse you needing extra time to get to work because of whatever reason. When an employer wants to fire you, they'll find any reason that suits them, even if the reasons were ignored before.

Poor performance can still be used, but I agree it's shady as fuck. Still, it happens in the same ways listed above.

[–]jtaylor73003 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You understand paying for the visit includes the time to get there and then back to work?? I don't understand why you be late for work for any other reason.

If your medicine causes you to oversleep then you report that to your doctor, employer, and lawyer. Then you all work out a reasonable accodamation based on several factors.

A work place injury is a very complex state of affairs that companies have to be careful with, usually they prefer you to stay out till you can return to work with little to no limitations.

[–]sillymod 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Uh, take the beating, sue the company for hostile work environment.

[–]BioGenx2b 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'll take that advice on a case-by-case basis. If I feel like my spine could get damaged, I think I'll pass.

[–]sillymod -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or don't be so aggressive that you get into situations where your spine could be damaged?

[–]BioGenx2b 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't be so aggressive.

[–]mrasarescumbags -14 points-13 points-12 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

All yall nerds are pathetic. Someone half your size isn't going to put you in the hospital by slapping you.

[–]BioGenx2b 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

3/10 IGN
"I've had better."

[–]patriot_Hannibal 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're an idiot.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your comment was automatically removed because you linked to reddit without using the "no-participation" np. domain. Reddit links should be of the form "np.reddit.com" or "np.redd.it"

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]mrasarescumbags -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

do you understand what slapping is? and the concept of size?

[–]patriot_Hannibal 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you know what an "O Soto Gari" is? Also, how small do I have to be for me to be able to get away with violence?

[–]aealow 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ever been slapped by a pissed off black chick?

[–]zombiehunter696 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty small so not many people are "half my size". So can I get away with attacking some 6'6" MMA fighter or something?

[–]crazydave1979 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Taking a beating may be fine if someone small is attacking.. But some fights lead to death, so that's a pretty awful policy

[–]Vanriel 79 points80 points81 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Whilst i don't condone violence, it was clearly self defence in that circumstance. Yet the company has stated that due to that incident both employees have been fired. So he got fired for defending himself? Or am i missing something?

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 100 points101 points102 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You're not missing anything. PR move. The public believes a woman should be able to assault with no repercussions.

[–]ChronQuixote 31 points32 points33 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Hope the guy files a wrongful termination lawsuit.

[–]sillymod -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If his contract says zero violence, then I doubt he would win one (obviously not a lawyer, just a personal opinion).

A good manager should be non-confrontational about these issues, because there is safety of others involved and the manager is not trained to deal with them. Call the police, have the person trespassed, and let the cops deal with it.

[–]Ohbeejuan 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This would obviously be the right thing to do, but people act very differently when being physically attacked. I would like to think I would be non-violent in a situation like this, but there's no way to tell.

[–]Zakaru99 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait? You want this guy to call the cops and wait for them to arrive while this woman attacks him?

[–]sillymod -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not even remotely. I want him to call the cops before it gets to the point where the woman attacks him.

[–]AspireBlack8 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The public believes a woman should be able to assault with no repercussions.

It's evident in that she said, "I'll get you fired if you put your hands on me." Then proceeded to hit him.

[–]M4XSUN 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't exactly say the woman was able to assault the man with no repercussions, after all she was fired as well.

[–]TokeyWakenbaker 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

It's probably company policy to fire anyone who conducts himself in any way.... This said, he could have just hid out in the office and let this woman get violent with someone else to save his own ass, and he would have kept his job. Seems like he did what needed to be done in the absence of the police at that moment. Not to mention it appears that no one else is intervening, so as the manager, what should he have done?

[+]-Manananggal- -18 points-17 points-16 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Arrest her. Grab her little arms, pin her weak little body to the ground and call 911. Boom, nobody gets hurt, you don't go to jail and likely keep your job. Punching her in the face was idiotic, clearly not necessary for defense.

[–]kovu159 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And when she starts biting and kicking while you're holding her, just sit there taking it until the police arrive? Yeah, that'll put you in the hospital.

[–]osufan765 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

She gave up all rights to peaceful resolution when she started the fight.

[–]-Manananggal- 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I thought we were talking about what the manager could have done differently.

[–]MittenMagick 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but you got downvoted for calling what he did idiotic, and /u/osufan765 was merely defending against that point.

[–]-Manananggal- -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Was it not? He lost his job and put himself at risk of arrest or a white knight beating. Whether she deserved it or not, punching her was stupid.

[–]MittenMagick 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Stupid? That's hindsight. It was a totally justifiable thing to do and "zero-tolerance policies" are a problematic cop-out. It saves a company (or school, another common ZTP place) from having to actually figure out who was doing the attacking and who was defending, but it screws over those that have no problem defending themselves. It teaches people that taking crap from others is okay or that defending yourself is just as bad as attacking someone when neither idea is true.

As far as risking arrest, I'm sure he knew that if the cops got involved that the evidence would point to self-defense. Also, let's be honest, no white knight would've had the courage to stand up to that guy. He's huge. If anyone did, once again, self-defense.

I wish I had a job I could offer this guy.

[–]intensely_human 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How about this? Standing up is a totally justifiable thing to do - in fact I would say people have a right to be able to basically stand up. Let's say it's on your own property. Do you have a right to be able to (literally) stand up, on your own property? Yes.

If you're hiding behind a stump though, and there's some maniac with a rifle hunting for you and who wants to kill you, at that moment standing up is an idiotic move, regardless of how much it is in your rights to do.

[–]MittenMagick 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In your situation the immediate consequences are readily apparent. I don't know how much managers know the nuances of corporate policy off the top of their head in situations such as the one this guy was in, especially when they are directly involved.

A more comparable situation, using yours as an example, would be how smart is it for me to pop out with my own rifle and shoot my would-be murderer? Pretty smart, otherwise he would keep shooting at me, further increasing my risk of harm.

[–]intensely_human1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm using a simplified situation to highlight the differences between the concepts of "justified by the rules" and "smart".

The analog of the "maniac with a gun" in my case is the societal norm that says "if you hit a women you're fucked". Given that norm, even though the norm is illegitimate as far as rights are concerned, it's idiotic to hit a woman unless it actually saves your own life.

[+]-Manananggal- -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He probably did more damage to his hand than she was capable of doing to him.

[–]MittenMagick 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does that matter? She was assaulting him. He has the right to defend himself.

[–]CACKENBOOLS 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is true, but it takes more than one person and they only looked to intervene after this guy probably came to the exact same conclusion.

We treat dogs better than this.

[–]TheJollySatan 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you're putting yourself at less risk if you can quickly incapacitate them.

[–]uabeng 22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really like how all of these videos edit out critical evidence.

[–]Etchii 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So panera bread's policy is for their workers to politely accept violence upon them and any attempt to stop the attacker is met with termination?

the police even cleared the man as acting in self defense! wtf?

[–]darwinsaves 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait... So you're telling me that there are women who only want "equality" when it benefits them, and they want to keep all of the privileges as well? I'm shocked.

[–]Hecket8 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Dat sarcasm, this is exactly what feminism is. Only humanism or egalitarianism is for equality.

[–]prnfce 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh deary me the comments

No way could a man punching a much smaller, unarmed woman in the face be classed as self-defence. That was horrendous to watch- it came all too easily to that man.

Yep he must be a woman beater on the regular and the aggressor!!

[–]shinarit 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Police were called to the restaurant and following an investigation found that the manager was acting in self defence, according to NY Daily News.

He later declined to press charges against the woman.

Why? Okay, probably she wouldn't get anything, but it's still worth trying, isn't it?

[–]Y_dilligaf 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Man I'm so tired of seeing this shit. If the employee was a man he would have been layed the fuck out. I'll be happy when I love in a country where people don't think they can attack someone without getting into a fight. Fuck your controversial shitty attitude, glad she got pUT in her place.

[–]thomas_d 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only way for this guy to keep his job was to allow himself to be assaulted. That's insane.

[–]defedude 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the world truly wasn't sexist, the article wouldn't have said "female worker". Treating females as helpless victims is sexism towards women. She obviously wasn't a helpless victim here and yet her gender is all people see.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar to today's race baiting.

"Teens attack local man..."

"White cop kills black youth..."

[–]wafflepizza 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

damn, guess I'll have to stop eating at panera. but i'm not going to support a company that would fire an employee for defending themselves.

[–]binrobinro 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same here.

[–]redwormcharlie 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I saw this too, everyone defending her, all those people go running to her aid afterwards.

I don't get this mentality, it needs to stop, women are not precious flowers anymore, they got equality and deserve no special treatment.

If you hit a PERSON you better expect to get hit back.

[–]Keiichi81 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Panera Bread said both the manager and the female worker had been fired as a result of the incident

How could she have been fired as a result of the incident when she had already been fired prior to the incident?

[–]composer773 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

From what I could tell from the audio, she slapped the shit out of him moments before he unloaded, and then swung again and missed about a half second before he defended himself. Maybe to some people there is a "choice", and he could have backed away, but I'd like to see how they react after getting slapped that hard, and then have another swing coming right at their face a half second later. Anyone who thinks the guy could have handled it better has probably never felt the surge of adrenaline that happens when you get slapped or hit that hard. I understand his punch looked purposeful, but he was probably trying to knock her out as cleanly as possible, before it turned into an all out brawl (where he would have risked getting hurt, and she likely would have gotten hurt 10x as bad). I also think people should understand that in the heat of the moment, the way we react to adrenaline is instinctive, and most of us have only a small amount of control over whether we run, freeze, or fight.

Let's also think about the woman's reaction here, she slaps the guy so hard he's momentarily dazed, and does she stop? Apologize? Leave? No, she immediately tries to hit him again, because she already hurt him the first time, why not keep doing it? A real "victim", to be sure.

TLDR - Give the guy a break, he was assaulted, battered (slapped quite hard, probably to the point where his ear was ringing and he was seeing stars, and she barely missed the second time), and defended himself against a recently fired employee.

[–]Elvick 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a smaller man was in place of that woman, the size of the men wouldn't matter. Well, people might say "That little guy should have thought more about hitting such a bigger man!"

Who initiated the altercation is all that matters. Which is how it should be no matter the people involved. Short of escalation of violence, ie; pulling a knife or gun after being hit once and stabbing/shooting them.

If you start something, expect that the other person will finish it. Which is why you don't start something.

I don't know why we as a society can claim to care about the safety of women, when we don't expect them to know that hitting someone is a bad idea. We just tell other people [men] to not hit them back. Seems stupid to me.

[–]Bearded_Deity 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dont you know as a man there is no such thing as being a victim by a woman? If you are a man, and a woman twice your size/weight walks up and starts punching you in the face, you should let her. Its only proper. If a woman takes advantage of you while your drunk, its not rape, because men cant be raped. You need to learn, being a man basically means you are allowed to do nothing but take it, allow yourself to get beat up, or hurt, or abused. Society demands it!

sarcasm; for those who didn't get it

[–]harleypig 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just bite the pillow man!

[–]cajunrevenge 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He would have been fired if it was a man he hit too, although it might never go public. Companies like this have a policy that you cant defend yourself if being attacked. If attacked your supposed to curl into a ball, start sobbing, and piss/shit yourself.

[–]manicmonkeys 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe companies like panera....I used to work at Wendy's, as a manager, and I can confidently tell you that we had no such policies. If we were being robbed, sure, policy is to give them what they want, since it's covered by insurance and not worth risk of physical injury. But no Wendy's employee had an obligation to take a beating.

[–]ndguardian 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow...the wording all throughout that article is HEAVILY biased on the side of the employee. You can definitely tell how the writer of the article tried to convey the situation there.

[–]General_Fear 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am sick and tired of this BS. The attitude is that a man never hits a woman. That women are delicate flowers. Why then do we have female soldiers and female cops?

If men should protect women from harm then why put them in uniforms and sent them to the front lines?

[–]wanderer779 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you go to the comments people who call out the BS are getting upvoted which is nice

[–]VaginalBurp 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WHY WOULD HE NOT PRESS CHARGES!!!!???? He's fucking FIRED for defending himself. So he should just hang out and let her assault him however she sees fit until she's done?

In all seriousness.....it's stories like this. I don't think I would ever hire a woman. How can he be fired for not wanting his eyes clawed out, or get his balls kicked through the top of his head?

[–]gtfomylawnplease 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Suppose it was a man the same size as the woman, would it be ok to hit him back? Of course, but a smaller man would understand he's getting hit back if he throws a punch. He's not been conditioned to treat his gender as a handicap.

[–]youdonotnome 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The author of that article should be ashamed of himself. It doesn't even mention the first slap which is loud as shit and everyone reacts to it in the video. Seriously, it's the most slanted article I've ever read. Fuck Sam Matthew

[–]DergonSteps 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The male boss, who is clearly taller than the junior employee, was then captured swinging his fist

Holy shit. They put emphasis on the words male and taller.

[–]The_BeardedGentleman 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Crazy. Its almost like if you act aggressively towards other humans you'll get some kind of reaction out of them.

[–]bobbage 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (63 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure the manager really handled that in the best way possible, to be honest. Panera seem to agree given that they fired him over it.

The articles about it also report that he had previously physically thrown the woman down a flight of stairs, he seems far from innocent here.

She didn't seem to be posing much of a threat to him but he really belted her. From the guy taking the video:

You might wanna say she hit him first, but really he had FULL CONTROL over her the entire time, was throwing her around, I think she gets one slap in that was louder than it was painful, then he half punches her once, she spins, and then he REALLY FUCKING PUNCHES her. You can even hear me and my friend yell DON’T HIT HER just before it… I checked on her for a while after the cops left, she seemed ok, she kept saying he really got her in the ear mostly which I know stings like a bitch. She was bleeding a little, and had cuts on her hands but she seemed ok after the adrenaline wore off.

I'd say the same if it was a man he was punching and throwing down stairs. Especially if the man in question was half his size.

It may have not have been legally prosecutable but that doesn't mean it was the best reaction either.

And try not to link the Daily Mail, thanks.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I'd say the same if it was a man he was punching and throwing down stairs. Especially if the man in question was half his size

As a really tiny guy that has seen pretty regular physical altercations because of bullying ... baloney. If this was a 5'5" man being belligerent and causing havoc, the larger man would have been excused twenty ways from Sunday for taking care of business and forcibly ejecting him from the premises.

You don't have to go very far on Reddit to find proof of it, either. There was a video on here from a week ago (I'll see if I can find it), where a total nutter walked in, harassed staff at a tire shop, and then the dude punched the counter staff across the face. The much larger counter staff dude came around, jumped him, hit him a couple of times, and then pinned him until the cops came.

The guy was a hero, despite a visible 50lbs and 3-4 inches on the other guy.

[–]Webonics 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What if there were differences between men and women?

If only we had the ability to discern and understand those differences in some quantitative way.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if there were differences between men and women?

So what? Any difference you could mine for a woman's reduced size could also be mined for a smaller man, ergo size cannot be the base point for legal culpability for violence.

[–]bobbage -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's just me, but I absolutely don't celebrate disproportionate and unnecessary escalation of force in self defense and it is not a gender issue, most of these sorts of situations involve two men and I don't think it is any more right there.

Self defense is fine but actually celebrating people being physically attacked when it was questionably necessary I find really distasteful.

[–]TheJollySatan 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

ex military here, you put yourself at the least risk by quickly incapacitating belligerents. This is called pragmatism and it is crucial when applied to the context of your preserving your own life and or limb.

[+]bobbage -11 points-10 points-9 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, there is absolutely no difference between a war zone and women slapping you.

[–]M1s4n7hr0p3 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Physical violence is physical violence. You don't want none, don't start none.

[–]intensely_human -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

This is an idiotic simplification. There is an enormous difference between a slap and an IED explosion, even though they are both called violence.

Where do we draw the line? If a two-year-old slaps you are you within your rights to slam him headfirst into a pillar? Because you just never know how much damage he could cause?

[–]bobbage 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Violence is violence, if it is right to shoot a Muslim insurgent threatening you with a bomb it must surely be equally acceptable to shoot a two year old that slaps you, or indeed drop a few bombs on their house.

Toddlers only do this sort of shit because they know they can get away with it, if more of them started getting shot their behavior would improve.

[–]M1s4n7hr0p3 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It really isn't though. If you don't want to be physically dominated by a larger person don't assault one. That goes for Muslim extremists attacking western states and women slapping men. My 2 year old nephew loves getting fucked up by me. But he knows who's boss because I made it clear when he pushed those boundaries when he was younger. Now it's playful. Before it wasn't. When he bit me, I bit him back. When he hit me, I knocked his ass over. Attack me in my sleep? Good, your ass is getting pinned to the floor. I don't cater to crocodile tears. It goes for all ages. Don't want to get clocked, keep your hands to your fucking self.

[–]intensely_human 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Did you ever slam him headfirst into a pillar? Or break his fingers? Or burn him? Would you say there's a limit to a reasonable response, that's proportionate to the attack?

[–]M1s4n7hr0p3 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You show me one instance in this thread where someone has committed such an act or endorsed such an escalation and I'll grant you the privilege of a serious response. Otherwise, fuck off troll bait.

[–]intensely_human2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Okay sure. In the video, the man slams the woman face-first into a pillar. In the comment that I originally responded to, someone said "violence is violence", implying that if you attack someone, this justifies any response that comes after that. As in once you slap, you have opened the Pandora's box of violence and must accept whatever comes out. Just follow this thread upwards to find what I'm referring to.

[–]M1s4n7hr0p31 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You're just bathing in hyperbole at this point. He did no such thing. He hit her and she fell. He didn't "slam her head into a pillar." Why am I even arguing this with you since you're clearly reaching? And the "violence is violence" was me. If you engage with a larger enemy, yes, you open the door to seven different kinds of whoop-ass and you'd better be prepared to deal with it. At what point did that ever turn to mutilating people? It didn't, you're simply villifying your opponent like a good little leftist.

[–]intensely_human1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

He did no such thing.

Watch the video again. He very clearly swings her around and slams her face-first into the pillar. At 0:12 is the moment of impact between her face and the pillar.

Why am I even arguing this with you since you're clearly reaching?

That's a question for yourself, not for me.

And the "violence is violence" was me. If you engage with a larger enemy, yes, you open the door to seven different kinds of whoop-ass and you'd better be prepared to deal with it.

But is it unlimited kinds of whoop-ass? Would he have been justified in continuing to beat her after she was down? Is there a line? My answer is yes, there is a line.

At what point did that ever turn to mutilating people?

So I guess mutilating people is over the line, yes? Or no? My point is that there is such a thing as measured response, and there is such a thing as going too far on one's response, and that to put all violent responses into a single bucket and consider them all equally justified is an idiotic over-simplification.

Do you agree with me or not?

[–]M1s4n7hr0p31 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

First off, his response was measured. He didn't wade in and beat her down. He struck her then allowed himself to be separated as the rest of the staff forced her out the door. He easily could have taken it further but he didn't need to as his response stopped her aggression as it was intended to. Secondly, you're attaching a blanket implication to an admittedly broad statement but you essentially tried to goad the commentor above you with words like "IED" and "warzone" simply because he revealed his veteran status. There was absolutely nothing untoward or untrue about his statement. When a threat presents itself, you neutralize it, there is no debate. That's exactly what this man did. If you want to debate with me about escalation of force protocols, go enlist, do two tours in an active AO then come back and talk to me. Until then your "measured response" speech holds no water.

[–]intensely_human1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm not arguing about his response. I'm arguing about the phrase "violence is violence".

[–]TheJollySatan 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The degree of force you need to incapacitate the target varies and escalates depending on the threat they pose. The same logic of escalation universally applies to every human regardless of gender. The context you present of a woman slapping a man is simplistic and comes no where near representing the immense variety of violence. Try again.

[–]Vandechoz 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's just me, but I absolutely don't celebrate disproportionate and unnecessary escalation of force in self defense

I don't celebrate it, but unless someone is hospitalized or dead at the end of it, I definitely don't condemn it. The line between reasonable and unnecessary escalation is very gray and it's not something I expect a person to be fully rational about when they're being attacked.

[–]The_Nameless_Mist 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing changes the fact that until that first punch gets thrown, there's no violence. We have to ultimately accept that the provocateur opens that door and punish them for setting that stage.

[–]iopq 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no escalation of force when someone uses force against you. If someone physically assaults you, you need to do whatever is necessary to be safe.

[–]stasis 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Tells us not to link to the Daily Mail, and then proceeds to quote the Daily Mail. Ok.

[–]whoizz 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because it gives the site revenue -- not because of the content.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

There was nothing wrong with the content in that link. It matched local news sites. The news sites had awful popups and auto play on the vid.

As for your take on what happened, you can defend that animal all you want. I've seen dozens like her. She needed to be checked.

Was he to wait for an eye to be clawed out, get spit on, get stabbed? Because that's what they do.

[+]shinarit -17 points-16 points-15 points 11 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

As for your take on what happened, you can defend that animal all you want. I've seen dozens like her. She needed to be checked.

This sounds dangerously like some TRP bullshit. Please escort yourself from this sub and never come back. Though considering the votes, the sub is agreeing with you, so screw you all.

She is not an animal, she is a voilent person. Yes, your original post is perfect, because it tells about the MEDIA reaction, which is biased. But /u/bobbage is right: that second punch was not really needed.

I don't say he should be punished, because he is not required to KNOW the exact measures which with he should disarm this situation, he is not a policeman or similar.

But yeah, he could have handled it better. Like that guy from the UK, who tripped the violent woman. This guy had the opportunity, I don't expect him to know his options, because it needs a cold head or years of training. But to say this wasn't the best option is not false.

[+]dingoperson2 -9 points-8 points-7 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

This sounds dangerously like some TRP bullshit. Please escort yourself from this sub and never come back. Though considering the votes, the sub is agreeing with you, so screw you all.

No, you're the one who should leave here. Fuck you to hell, you're a worthless, toxic piece of shit.

Go to one of the radfem subreddits - your mentality seems better suited to those paranoid shit-chambers of man-hate.

[–]Xer0day 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You sound equally as hateful as the radfems you're complaining about.

[+]dingoperson2 -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm okay with that. Animals like him don't understand anything else than abuse and harassment, so it's something I literally have to take on myself to create a better environment for everyone.

I wish I didn't have to. I wish words and reason worked. They don't. It's like trying to give a schoolbook to a spider to teach it not to bite people. It only changes its behavior from perceptions of discomfort or reward. I can literally only get him to stop his behavior by making him uncomfortable.

Like when society uses police and prisons rather than kind arguments - sometimes the kind arguments don't work.

[–]shinarit -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Wow, now we play spot-the-misogynist? You wouldn't believe people like you exist, but they do. Thankfully most of the MRM is actually sane people.

[–]raps_caucasionally 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How was that misogyny?

[–]dingoperson2 -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

It's not surprising that your reaction is to accuse me of misogyny, it just illustrates precisely what I said.

Any actual human can see that I have neither here nor anywhere in a year of posts expressed hatred for women in general. I've rather expressed defense of women and opposition to systems and cultures that harm women. But as some kind of insect or machine you still reach for "misogyny" instinctively.

Spiders instinctively use their fangs, roaches use their mandibles, you reach for "MISOGYNY".

From your posting history your existence on Reddit is obsessively focused on pretending that computer game worlds are real. You write extensively on your life in these worlds and speculate about the culture in them. That doesn't point to a healthy, normal life.

When you're taking breaks from that, it's to show insectile behavior other places as well. A guy was pushed into a pool ruining $350 of electronics, and you utterly out of the blue called him a "douchebag" and said "there was nothing to see here", for which you got downvoted. . There's no justification for the posts you make in any sane mind.

Did you ever consider that maybe you're so far from actual humans that you will never actually be a part of the world, other than as some kind of insect or parasite on actual human beings? Maybe it's time to reevaluate your self-worth.

[–]minimim -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Get out and don't come back, we don't like you.

[–]mansplain 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why the exclusionary attitude there buddy?

[–]minimim -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They have their own forums, no need to come here too.

[–]dingoperson2 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Insects supporting insects, not surprising.

His original post which I reacted to is downvoted - that's good.

[–]minimim -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't make you any less shitty.

[–]dingoperson2 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It shows that the sub on the balance agrees with me that his post was shitty. Which justifies trying to keep shits like him out of here in the first place.

edit: like, his post is at -10 and my response is at -1. So that's OK.

I've explained my rationale. I'm OK that you call me a shit for that. Doing the right thing sometimes provokes people, which is just part of the cost.

Oh, and rather funnily -- rather than explain to me why I am wrong, you simply insult me. Which is kind of like my original stance - it was clear kind words wouldn't work with him, so I simply insulted him. You mirror me - nice one. The relevant difference is simply that you're wrong in your belief.

[–]shinarit1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Wow, and you really believe you are somehow intellectually superior in this "debate". Wow, just wow. People like you exist. This is a happy day.

[–]dingoperson2-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Superior to everyone? No. Superior to the insect you? Yes. See posts above.

Seriously, reading through your posts, I can't really imagine that a mentally functioning human could write things like that. It's like reading machine created language.

[–]shinarit0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I read them, and still find it hard to believe that you are real. I thought only feminists have this kind of batshit crazy, defensive, smarter-than-you retards. You are like a neckbeard fedora-dualwielding radfem on ritalin.

[–]dingoperson2-1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your instinctual reaction was to lash out and call me a misogynist.

Once you recognize that you react in this way, you should reevaluate the existence of the meaty bits in your head.

[–]shinarit1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What can I say, when I see the truth, I tend to write it down.

[–]dingoperson20 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes, yes, the truth. You see the truth. You see my "misogyny". Everyone else sees an insect amongst humans.

[–]shinarit1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Well, if you identify as insect, I won't tell you otherwise. But I think you will have better luck on tumblr, search for the #otherkin tag.

[+]bobbage -15 points-14 points-13 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Was he to wait for an eye to be clawed out, get spit on, get stabbed?

Did any of that happen, or are you just straw manning?

[–]garglemesh42 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

If someone attacks you, the best response is to do something to make sure they can't hurt you again. Incapacitate them if at all possible. Your attacker has already shown they are willing to physically harm you to get what they want. Do you really think giving them the opportunity to pull a weapon on you is a good idea? Aim to incapacitate (not harm, unless you have no choice) with your first blow. That's the only reasonable response to someone committing physical violence against you.

[+]bobbage -10 points-9 points-8 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There was a weapon now? Interesting, I missed that bit from the article.

[–]ARedthorn 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When you feel threatened- when someone has used violence- yes. There's always a weapon.

Because you always assume the worst.

Let's say you assume your attacker is capable of killing you, and you defend yourself in such a way as to make sure they can't (but without killing them)... You find out you were wrong, and someone has a bruise.

Let's say you assume they're not a threat when they do have a weapon or the willingness to go lethal. You don't defend yourself and your family finds out you were wrong when you or someone else gets dead.

Wrong = bruise and some paperwork vs wrong = death.

Which assumption are you more comfortable with?

[–]PM_ME_UR_PLANTS 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She had a bag.

[+]bobbage -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, could have had a micro nuke in it for all we know. A bag! A woman had a bag, clearly she was up to something.

[–]PM_ME_UR_PLANTS 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People have been known to carry weapons in them.

[–]U2_is_gay -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He probably should've just killed her on the spot. That shouldn't ended everything real quick.

[–]dingoperson2 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The term "straw manning" doesn't mean what you think it means.

E.g. if someone says "Don't drive too fast because a deer might run across the road" then he's not strawmanning the existence of a deer. He's pointing to something that could potentially happen justifying another course of action.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're an apologist in the wrong subreddit. You should go around in a football helmet and pads because of you let some get all over you like that, and do nothing, you're in trouble.

Jesus loves you. Happy new year.

[+]bobbage -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is /r/MensRights last time I checked, not /r/LetsPunchWomen.

[–]enjoycarrots 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm on both sides of this fence, really. As in, this is certainly not /r/LetsPunchWomen and it really sours my mood to see even a few comments that might make you think it is. I also don't think this reaction was the best choice, and I'd rather not have it celebrated as if he was a hero.

But, there is also a valid mensrights issue to discuss about cases like this. And you don't have to celebrate the violence for that issue to be important. If a man wouldn't be fired for reacting in this way in response to a man instead of a woman, then the man shouldn't be fired for reacting like this with a woman. Ditto any legal repercussions. Ditto media outrage.

If this was another man he was tussling with, even a much smaller, much weaker man, we might be seeing media headlines and comments cheering him on for putting the punk in his place. Or maybe more likely, we would have never heard about it at all.

[–]Demonspawn 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Until women have equal repercussions for their actions, equality is not possible.

So, for the egalitarians in MR, yes, they have to support women getting hit back when said woman assaults a man.

[–]Psychol324 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say the same if it was a man he was punching and throwing down stairs. Especially if the man in question was half his size.

Doesn't matter how big and strong someone is, you have to fight back because those little fuckers will annoy you as long as they can if you won't do anything, I know something about this.

[–]Webonics -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course he's far from innocent. He through a fucking haymaker at a girl who swatted at him.

He's a bitch. What the fuck could that girl do to him that would hurt him? He had clear physical control over her.

Hitting her like that is fucked up. This subreddit is essentially a platform that espouses beating up people that are weaker and smaller than you.

It's the most embarrassing thing I've ever seen, as a man.

[–]dingoperson2 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Try not to attack the Daily Mail unless you provide an alternative source that gives better coverage, thanks. Sometimes the Daily Mail is the only or main source to cover something.

[–]bobbage -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gawker was actually the original source for this story which I linked elsewhere in the thread and all the sources copied. They are usually about as bad but in this case they were the actual original source the video was sent to.

[–]thaloopdigga 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

well the police determined it was in self defense so no rights violated here. which is a good thing. I was about ready to flip my shit if they'd arrested the poor bastard

[+]Ransom_Stoddard 11 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

no rights violated here

Except her violating his rights, causing him to be fired. Pretty sure his rights were fucking trampled in many ways.

[–]thaloopdigga 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah thats true. but when she violated his right to not be assaulted, he exercised his right to defend himself and wasn't penalized by the law for it.

[–]Kloebeashi 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He was probably having a shitty day

[–]thrustinfreely 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh SNAP! Oh SSSSSSNAP!

[–]JJrodny 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Linked to it in /r/TwoXChromosomes - I'd like to see the discussion they generate

[–]tygertiger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While there currently aren't a lot, the majority of comments on the article itself support the manager and his right to defend himself. That's a good sign.

[–]TheCitizenAct 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. Don't feel bad. Chivalry is long dead.
  2. She's equal before the law. She decided to hit you. She made that choice; she knew the repercussions.
  3. Charge her.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amazing. Even the cops say it was self-defense, yet morons still see it as a shocking thing for him to do.

[–]TheMer0vingian 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, this article irks me. Nowhere in the title or the recollection of events does it ever mention that she attacked him first or that she was deliberately trying to incite him into using violence to get him fired. The entire time it just goes on about how appalling it is that a large male hit a female employee. What a joke excuse for journalism.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article is copy pasted on all the local news sites.

[–]inspiringpornstar 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course everyone agrees you shouldn't start a fistfight, especially with a woman, but you wouldn't just let a woman knock you out or seriously injure yourself if you can prevent it.

I'd like to start a fight with someone who believes this zero tolerance policy bs just to see what they would do (as an experiment with best intentions and not to break any laws), I guarantee instincts will kick in

[–]hotsizzlepancakes1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

he was fired

[–]Fastbreak99 -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not trying to stir the pot, but I don't see the self defense that clearly here. She was struggling and they grasped each other, but I don't see her make a real strike.

The FSU QB in a bar? That was obviously self defense, but here I don't think the cameras shows her being the initial aggressor. Is there a timestamp I should pay close attention to?

[–]planned_serendipity1 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't really see her slap because someone is in the way, but boy you sure hear it. She connected good. His response was legitimate self defense. His only mistake was not filing charges.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He diffused the situation. Otherwise, it was only escalating.

[–]fucks-like-a-tiger -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This case is exhibit A of why a man retaliating equivalently against a woman's violence is a bad idea. Unless it's Rhonda Rousey punching me, I think I'm just gonna suck it up.

[–]manicmonkeys 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's an example of how messed up people's views on violence are.

[–]iopq 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If Rhonda Rousey was punching you and you punched her back, the headlines would still say "man punches woman half his size"

[–]fucks-like-a-tiger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably, but at least I wouldn't be dead.

[–]tygertiger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Feel free to retain your prerogative to be a punching bag while others retain their right to self-defence.

[–]fucks-like-a-tiger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can take it from 99% of the bitches, including the big bull dykes. What I don't want is my life ruined by a trip through the "justice system", a la George Zimmerman.

[–]Solo413-4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

If u ever in thay situation... watch the hands , keep pushing them away.. stomp on her foot and push as hard as u can.... they will fall over usually sprain an ankle which makes them incapable of fighting.. there is no need to smack or hit.. just put ur foot on hers and push ..

Protect yourself

[+]Webonics -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Once again this shitty subreddit defends a grown ass man sailing a hay maker at some tiny girl who swatted at him.

Collectively you people are the biggest pussies on the planet.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why are you excusing this woman's actions? You don't lose your shit and start randomly attacking people, ever, it doesn't matter if you're a man or a woman.

If she was coming at him with a knife I'd bet people like you would be exactly the same, where do you fucking draw the line? Because I know which side I'm on, you don't attack other people, period, if you do, expect to get hit.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you've never been in this type of situation. I have been. Once on 7th grade and as an adult with a crazy ex.

I was much bigger than both and its scary.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you've never been in this type of situation. I have been. Once on 7th grade and as an adult with a crazy ex.

I was much bigger than both and its scary.

[–]LiteweightPhenomenal -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. Was just thinking how different the reaction would be if it was a small dude getting punched & why everyone is jumping on the self defense card like he had no other option but to fight her.

[+]qdobe -10 points-9 points-8 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Let's be clear here. He absolutely did not need to hit the woman. He should have just manhandled her out the door. But he cocked his fist way back and unloaded. This is a similar situation to the FSU QB. I disagree that she should not have been charged but at the same time I am not surprised he got fired.

Edit: Self-Defense vs. Retaliation

[+]Hecket 11 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't matter, if you been fired, been told not to trespass and escorted of the property but then come back inside the property and physically put your hands on me and assault me yeah i am gonna use full force to fight back. Fuck your social conditioning bullshit. Don't put your hands on someone if you don't want to run the risk of getting your ass handed to you. Woman/man/LGBT doesn't matter if they assault me i'm gonna defend myself with punches and kicks to get them off me. As a human you should be aware of this fact, even as a woman you know very well that some men will not take your beta shit and lay down taking your assault.

[–]VYR3 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Don't touch people and expect them to be okay with it. Hit me and I'll crush you.

[–]qdobe -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

What I am saying is......that is what the law says. If someone pushes you, that does not give you free reign to pummel them. If both people contribute to a fight, both people get arrested. That is not a gender issue.

Edit: Definition of assault and battery

http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-and-battery-overview.html

That man was definitely NOT fearing for his safety, he was pissed that she slapped him. So he whooped her, He AS WELL AS she deserves to get in trouble.

Now back to social terms ASIDE from the law, don't punch someone without being prepared to take a punch.

(a lot of people are talking about correcting social norms, but the law does not allow basically anything that happened in the video)

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can only agree with the end. None of us are surprised that he got fired.

[+]finebalance -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

We walked in, in the middle of her quitting her job mid shift. She was yelling at a different manager than the one who hit her and was throwing some bags of chips on the ground, threatening to turn up in this bitch, etc. Really nothing I haven’t seen before or wouldn’t expect from someone who has to work at a fucking Panera all day. Then out of nowhere white shirt manager approaches her and immediately gets physical with her, keep in mind she’s about 5’2 at most and he was bigger than me... He legit threw her down a flight of stairs and out the front door for really no reason, she runs around to the other entrance to retaliate and that’s where the video starts. You might wanna say she hit him first, but really he had FULL CONTROL over her the entire time, was throwing her around, I think she gets one slap in that was louder than it was painful, then he half punches her once, she spins, and then he REALLY FUCKING PUNCHES her.

Read the entire witness statement.

Look, there are plenty of cases where I've seen violent women be hypocritically defended, but if the witness checks out (which makes the police statement exceedingly problematic, or conversely the witness unreliable), this is clearly not one of them. She's 5 feet 2 for fucks sake%. He allegedly threw her down a flight of stairs. And punched her, straight out. Are you seriously defending this shit? And god, some of the comments: animal, seriously?

This sub has given me some great info and really helped me articulate some issues I've had with feminism for a while, but if the top comments to this story are about blindly defending this guy - exactly what we accuse feminism of doing - then what exactly is the difference between the two movements?

%The stature is important because it is quite possible for somebody of his size to manage a violent person of that women's size without hurting them. That he chooses not to do so, is problematic. And yes, to preempt an obvious critique: I would use the same argument if it were a man of that stature.

[–]yummyluckycharms 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Size and frame are irrelevant. IF someone is crazily violent, they can easily cause far more harm than people of greater size than themselves.

What we have in this situation is a woman who returns after getting fired and becomes intensely violent in a location where members of the public are. The manager could've restrained her and kicked her out again, but then what happens if comes back and starts attacking patrons outside? Do you stand and do nothing while grannies are kicked in the ribs outside the restaurants front door?

There is a reason why cops are trained to shoot in the chest instead of causing arm or leg wounds

[–]manicmonkeys 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he actually threw her down a flight of stairs, that changes things.

It would not justify her actions still, since she was trespassing in the first place by coming back to the restaurant (from what I can gather). It would definitely justify him being fired though, for initiating physical contact, unless there was any specific reason to believe she was presenting a physical threat to sometime there.... like if she reached into her purse after threatening to shoot or stab someone.

[–]Dj_Nussdog[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The video speaks louder than a witness account. Those witness accounts all talk about size and sex which of course is omg big man hit woman.

Look at the video. Have you not seen what little wild black women are capable of?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter